2008:" (as in intentional homicide), in order to underline the agent's unwillingness to kill; as Puttmann points out: <<Triplicem intentionem in eo qui malum facinus sibi proposuit, distingui debere puto. One in eo consistet, ut VOLUERIT TOTUM, quo facinus perpetratum fuit, effectum (direct malice). Allera, ut facinus intra Certos sibi proposuerit fines, PRAEVIDERITQUE, majorem inde quam sibi proposuit effectum, facile sequi posse, neque tamen non etiam in hunc consenserit (indirect malice). Tertia ut voluerit quidem malum facinus, sed NON PRAEVIDERIT majorem inde quam voluil effectum oriri possess, qui tamen praeter Opinion inde oritur: -->
1529:. It takes a certain amount of time for law reports, law journal articles and legal treatises to be published. This case is four days old. Is there a law report in The Times? I have not seen one. The most frequent law journals were traditionally usually weekly publications, and some of them are less frequent now. In any event, magistrates courts have traditionally been inferior courts whose decisions do not set precedents or trigger the doctrine of stare decisis. I am not aware of that having changed recently (though I have not been following developments closely for a while). If the decision does not set a precedent, the
1374:
237:
168:
150:
178:
790:
1591:
119:
1836:, a U.S. Supreme Court Justice in the 1800s. The article uses the phrase in an uncited paragraph: "he authored dissents in Kendall v. United States ex rel. Stokes (1838) and Holmes v. Jennison (1840). These two dissents sought to diminish federal authority by supporting Jacksonian political aspirations and opposing restrictions to state sovereignty. Kendall dealt with
1730:
1653:
1406:
1262:
888:
643:
613:
959:
they were slave traders and they may well have accepted these jury payment coupons in exchange for a slave but then were unable to turn it into some other form of money. If this is the wrong place to ask, I would love pointers to any other resource that might be helpful, either within
Knowledge (XXG) or on the wider web. Thanks in advance.
2031:
think they'll have better luck talking to the original author about it. Any chance you could give that a try? I'll do it myself if necessary, but I really don't think I'll be as effective. "Original research" isn't an easy concept to understand since we don't really use that phrase in the way most non-wikipedians expect it means. --
1380:
Hi everyone, I made a map of U.S. states that restrict employee invention assignment agreements to work related to the employer's business or created using the employer's resources. It is current as of Sept. 2023, when New York became the 11th state to enact such a law. Have any other states passed
1146:
Surely there must be a rule to prevent articles like this. It's so sloppily written that it could endanger people, legally or physically. Luckily it's so bad that maybe no one would who pay any attention to it. It's like a medical article telling people the dosage of medicine to take, only without
809:
I am not sure that this is a real and widespread term even in the claimed regions. The previously removed external links seem to point to one person (with a company with "law broker" in the name), who uses the term to describe lawyer referral services. I don't think any validation of this as a term
2030:
Ack, sorry for missing the above thread. Yes, I'm concerned with sections like that but I think they can be fixed by simply removing them - normally, I would do this myself after making an accept like this, but I was hoping that someone with a law background could do that, rather than me, since I
958:
or similar). Is there anyone here with a background in
American law who can take a look and tell me what the practical outcome was? I really can't figure out if they were going to get money or not. I'm interested for two reasons: (1) D. W. Orr was on a county grand jury a couple of times, and (2)
979:
as a means of executing the judgment that they won.Whether the Orrs ever actually got paid the full amount, or whether they settled for some lesser amount, would have to be determined from some other source. I would also note that if you intend to summarize the court decision in the article, you
1963:
concerns before. The creator is a newbie who's been having a really frustrating time with page patrol, AfCers, and so on. They certainly appear to be knowledgeable, committed, and acting in good faith, so I think some mentorship from someone in this wikiproject could be really valuable here. I
1072:
Excellent. I mostly just do bios and try to set up some general who-what-when-where-why-how boundaries on their exploits, but all the legal shenanigans these guys got into are very valuable to actual
Scholars and I know this info will someday slot into an academic paper on, like, "financial
1235:
My search on Google Books and JSTOR isn't turning up any good
English-language sources. I did find a couple uses of the term in Spanish and Italian, but only passing mentions. I suspect that much of the current draft is original research; many of the sources don't even mention the term.
1537:
important, but the fact that someone used the wrong procedure to prosecute a large number of cases does not necessarily mean that the law has changed, or that it was ever in doubt. 19 newspaper articles come up in Google News on a search for
Northern+Trains+Greater+Anglia+Quashed.
1297:
Since then, Iāve represented myself (pro se) as both plaintiff and defendant in a few cases in municipal and county common pleas courts. Iāve a craft for writing motions, briefs and orders. On this project, youāll likely find most of my edits to be grammatical or to add citations.
728:
Thanks - the inactivity is less of a concern for me than the benefit of being able to say "I'd like to see stuff I can improve that's relevant to my interests". I'm reasonably confident about improving, say, articles on
English topics but not on ones related to other
974:
The
Georgia Supreme Court affirmed the Superior Court order, which directed the justices of the Bibb County Court to pay the Orrs out of the County Treasury. The Court also held that if the Bibb County Court justices refused to pay, the Orrs could make a motion to
684:. Both are marked inactive. Articles are put in the Australian and Canadian projects respectively by adding law=yes to the WikiProject Australia/Canada talk page template. In the past we had an "EW" parameter for England and Walesāit no longer works, so
1906:
I posted the issue here not with the purpose of someone butchering my input, but for an editors that have expertise in laws read the internets and write at least stubs for various meaning of the term, readily found online. These different meanings are
921:, which includes some litigation and summary of legal scholarship, namely in "Corporate Affairs." I would appreciate it if anyone could give it a quick glimpse to see if it meets quality standards and is generally correct since I am not a lawyer.
1868:
It does not matter whether you agree or disagree, it is a valid disambiguation page. I created it while searching google for the usage of the term. You cannot unilaterally judge its usage without community discussion. Yor edit was reverted.
1552:
Thanks. I've corrected the name in the header. I read most of the judgement, which I found interesting. It seems there will need to be additional proceedings to declare the remaining cases void, if that is what is to happen. All the best:
1629:
An editor is contesting the inclusion of something into an article and they claim that ABA Journal is some "obscure" thing. Is this too tangential/trivial, or is this a significant thing? I would appreciate your input at the discussion.
942:
Greetings! I'm not sure if this is an appropriate place to ask, but I have no legal background and I find appeals cases especially confounding bc they're about law and process not facts etc. Anyway, I would like to briefly summarize the
1301:
Please note that I have access to hundreds of academic databases and journals, so Iām able to cite work, including works that may be behind a paywall. On that note, if you need access, contact me, and Iāll see what I can do to help!
501:
I'm looking to create articles on some of the more significant decisions, which (to the best of my knowledge) do not yet exist. Would media coverage and scientific literature be sufficient to establish notability (along the lines of
694:
allows the creation of taskforces in a fairly simple way, and it seems like a reasonable use case for jurisdiction-specific articles. I'm keen on setting one up for
England and Wales where I think I can reasonably contribute.
1983:. I noted then that it appeared to have a lot of OR and was extremely unclear, and I still have those concerns. I agree that the author is operating in good faith, but I don't think this should have been approved at AfC.
1704:
761:
475:
1348:
1198:). It appears to be a notable concept in the common law systems of various contries, but the draft may need to be rebuilt from the ground up to be suitable for mainsapce. Is anyone able to assist?
583:
Yeah, and even that list is lacking many of the ācoreā cases regarding free speech, freedom of assembly etc. Might work my way through some of them, itās good practice for me anyway. Thank you!
1846:
does state that "judicial supervision" was a function of the Court, but this is a start class article and there's no indication that that translation is referring to a proper legal term of art.
1843:
1054:
Probably unimportant for your purposes, but I forgot to note that the Court also held that the statute of limitations didn't start to run until the inferior court refused to pay the Orrs.
1763:". I created a layman's disambig page for this, to provide a minimal guidance, but experts must write decent articles at least for the two major very different meanings of the term. --
1036:(1852). Google Scholar turns up nothing about this case, which is unsurprising. I would try Bibb County newspapers, as this likely would have been big political news in the local area.
1930:
620:
606:
1367:
39:
1005:
2. Plot twist! OK I'll see if I can find other mention of the decision. Hoo boy now I have to learn the secret code of case names! All grist for the mill, I suppose.
1438:
There is currently a discussion concerning whether or not it is appropriate to display the flag of Israel on this article. Experienced editors are invited to join
249:
1601:
has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the
732:
I'll wait for more feedback, but once there's consensus, I'll try and kick off an E&W one, and hopefully that can be a model for doing likewise for others. ā
2045:
I don't think this can be fixed. I truly think this is a TNT or stubify situation. I would do so, but I still don't understand exactly what preterintention is.
1959:
I've recently accepted this draft through AfC, and I'd really appreciate it if some experienced wp:law editors could have a look at it, as it's been tagged for
74:
561:
cases are probably notable, so it doesn't surprise me that most of the BverfG cases would be. I'm shocked that we don't have articles on most of the cases in
895:
881:
710:
If people are interested, I'd be fine with that and would participate in a US one. Otherwise, I think we'd just end up with a bunch of inactive task forces.
397:
392:
385:
380:
375:
368:
363:
358:
351:
346:
341:
334:
329:
324:
317:
312:
307:
1737:
1723:
2063:
Fair enough. I'll try and pick out the biggest chunks, and if no one steps in in a few days or so, take it to AfD to see if we have consensus for TNT. --
300:
295:
290:
283:
278:
273:
266:
261:
256:
2095:
2087:
1413:
1399:
1886:
the page, which anyone can unilaterally do. The BLAR guideline also says that reverting it is appropriate. As is opening an AfD, which I have now done.
854:
80:
681:
1703:
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
1347:
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
760:
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
474:
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
2099:
677:
454:
1194:? I came across an article on the topic during new page patrol that was so dense it was basically unreadable (currently in draftspace at
2138:
2133:
858:
2143:
2004:
The use of appropriate terminology is decidedly useful: in praeterintentional homicide the term "killing" is used and not that of "
20:
1964:
removed the extant maintenance tags as I think they were a bit overzealously applied, but there are still some issues in here. --
980:
should find a secondary source describing it. In my view and the views of many others here, summarizing a court decision is OR.
450:
69:
2096:
Talk:1948_Palestinian_expulsion_and_flight#RfC_ā_In_the_article_section_about_"Haifa",_should_the_following_paragraph_be_added?
1807:
1778:
1217:
standard used in some countries. I think it's probably notable, but I agree that that draft is extremely dense and unreadable.
130:
2001:
Major issues include citing books without page numbers, the structure of the article, and passages that scream OR, like this:
650:
636:
1603:
846:
801:
779:
60:
1781:
entry instead of being a disambiguation page because there are no title matches and I don't think the entries there meet
850:
2054:
2021:
1992:
1942:
1895:
1859:
1660:
1646:
1500:
1462:
1326:
1294:. Iāve been interested in and have participated in the US legal system since high school as a prosecutor in mock trial.
1269:
1255:
1226:
1110:
1063:
1045:
989:
719:
574:
562:
530:
191:
155:
24:
1700:
1694:
1033:
757:
751:
430:
1073:
instruments of the antebellum south" or "American slave traders and
Georgia state law" etc. Appreciate you. Warmly,
629:
1818:
1707:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
1351:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
1241:
1203:
1101:). If you come across any interesting legal characters that you would like help with, I'd be happy to collaborate.
951:
764:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
478:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
1558:
1473:
1439:
1432:
691:
471:
465:
409:
1373:
1344:
1338:
494:
136:
1273:
1140:
955:
588:
548:
511:
195:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
1782:
1683:
1517:
1195:
1152:
976:
1290:
Hello, Iām writing to introduce myself as a subject expert in law! I was referred to join
Project Law by
862:
50:
1623:
1447:
1237:
1199:
944:
90:
65:
2068:
2036:
1969:
1760:
1555:
1470:
1421:
1307:
1291:
1171:
903:
737:
700:
662:
1915:
1873:
1767:
1745:
1675:(The only reason I can see for that article being in WikiProject Law is that this diplomat studied
1635:
1612:
1597:
1579:
1094:
2104:
1543:
928:
584:
544:
507:
415:
1491:. I presume this will get (or already has) SIGCOV since it seems to be a pretty major decision.
503:
1911:
and hence require explanation. I didn't want to do it myself because I lack qualifications. --
1833:
1812:
1680:
1665:
1527:
Northern Trains Limited v Ballington, Wylie and Cooke and Greater Anglia v Baggaley and others
1514:
1457:
Northern Trains Limited v Ballington, Wylie and Cooke and Greater Anglia v Baggaley and others
1387:
1148:
1098:
870:
829:
624:
441:
I would like some help understanding something apparently invlolving the US Justice Department
46:
1883:
676:
Would it be useful to have jurisdiction-specific taskforces? We have some subprojects listedā
2050:
2017:
1988:
1938:
1891:
1855:
1777:
I disagree that an article is needed at this point. I think the page should redirect to the
1496:
1443:
1322:
1222:
1124:
1106:
1078:
1059:
1041:
1013:
985:
964:
715:
570:
526:
411:
236:
1583:
816:
540:
413:
2064:
2032:
1965:
1953:
1801:
1712:
1417:
1356:
1303:
1167:
899:
833:
769:
733:
696:
656:
483:
446:
1960:
1908:
1163:
1912:
1870:
1764:
1741:
1631:
1608:
2119:
2072:
2058:
2040:
2025:
1996:
1973:
1946:
1919:
1899:
1877:
1863:
1826:
1771:
1749:
1716:
1686:
1669:
1639:
1616:
1563:
1547:
1520:
1504:
1478:
1451:
1425:
1392:
1360:
1330:
1311:
1280:
1245:
1230:
1207:
1175:
1156:
1128:
1114:
1082:
1067:
1049:
1017:
993:
968:
932:
907:
874:
815:
While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be
773:
741:
723:
704:
666:
592:
578:
552:
534:
515:
487:
458:
2127:
1676:
1539:
1488:
923:
1823:
1119:
Oooh loooove those. If I find anyone notable and cool, I'll definitely flag you.Ā :)
1786:
1510:
1383:
866:
167:
149:
1008:
Seriously tho, thanks again for translating the legalese. I truly appreciate it.
2046:
2013:
1984:
1934:
1887:
1851:
1492:
1318:
1218:
1120:
1102:
1074:
1055:
1037:
1009:
999:
981:
960:
711:
566:
522:
177:
1708:
1352:
797:
783:
765:
621:
Talk:Constitution of the People's Republic of China#Requested move 4 July 2024
607:
Talk:Constitution of the People's Republic of China#Requested move 4 July 2024
479:
183:
173:
1797:
2098:
about whether specific prose attributed to Benny Morris should be added to
1929:: For those who would like to weigh in, there is currently a discussion at
1738:
Talk:Brazilian investigation into Elon Musk#Requested move 1 September 2024
1724:
Talk:Brazilian investigation into Elon Musk#Requested move 1 September 2024
1624:
Talk:Music_Millennium#Millennium_Enterprises,_Inc._v._Millennium_Music,_L.P
543:
would mean that almost all āstandard casesā are notable, is that an issue?
839:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing
1214:
1023:
918:
1729:
1652:
1414:
Talk:2024 Kolkata rape and murder incident#Requested move 16 August 2024
1405:
1400:
Talk:2024 Kolkata rape and murder incident#Requested move 16 August 2024
1261:
896:
Talk:Indictment and arrest of Julian Assange#Requested move 17 July 2024
887:
882:
Talk:Indictment and arrest of Julian Assange#Requested move 17 July 2024
642:
612:
2005:
1793:
1533:
importance might be exactly zero. Quashing 75,000 convictions may be
558:
1372:
521:
GNG. We don't have specific notability criteria for court cases.
416:
230:
196:
112:
15:
1093:
My pleasure. I've worked on a couple of legal bios recently (
1728:
1651:
1404:
1260:
886:
788:
641:
611:
604:
1759:
Knowledge (XXG) is in the need of articles about the term "
1661:
Talk:Albrecht von Bernstorff#Requested move 19 August 2024
1647:
Talk:Albrecht von Bernstorff#Requested move 19 August 2024
651:
Talk:Free Press (organization)#Requested move 14 July 2024
637:
Talk:Free Press (organization)#Requested move 14 July 2024
1844:
Supreme Court of the Lithuanian Soviet Socialist Republic
1740:
that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.
1663:
that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.
1416:
that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.
1272:
that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.
1270:
Talk:Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita#Requested move 15 July 2024
1256:
Talk:Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita#Requested move 15 July 2024
1213:
I've never heard of the concept, but it appears to be a
898:
that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.
653:
that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.
623:
that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.
1186:
Is anyone here familiar here with the legal concept of
857:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
685:
98:
1147:
any sources. Can it be saved or should it be deleted?
822:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
686:
I removed the documentation for it earlier in the year
493:
Which notability criteria apply to decisions by the
810:
that is used will ever be discovered in the future.
1832:"judicial supervision of executive acts" links to
1804:do not contain the phrase "judicial supervision".
1368:File:Invention assignment agreements by state.svg
2002:
938:1852 Georgia (U.S.) Supreme Court decision help
917:Hello WP Law. I recently finished the page for
563:Federal Constitutional Court#Landmark decisions
447:Talk:Simon_Ekpa#The_US_Justice_Department_thing
129:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
27:and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
1162:I'm getting a strong feeling that it might be
424:This page has archives. Sections older than
8:
672:Proposal: Jurisdiction-specific task forces?
2088:Talk:1948 Palestinian expulsion and flight
682:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Australian law
144:
1736:There is a requested move discussion at
1659:There is a requested move discussion at
1412:There is a requested move discussion at
1268:There is a requested move discussion at
894:There is a requested move discussion at
678:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Canadian law
649:There is a requested move discussion at
619:There is a requested move discussion at
828:notice, but please explain why in your
146:
2102:. Editors are invited to participate.
1829:use the phrase "judicial supervision".
1810:uses the term twice in the context of
434:when more than 4 sections are present.
2100:1948 Palestinian expulsion and flight
1029:Justices of the Inferior Court v. Orr
506:) or do they need something special?
7:
1980:
118:
116:
199:and the subjects encompassed by it.
135:It is of interest to the following
817:deleted for any of several reasons
804:because of the following concern:
14:
1026:citation for this case would be:
428:may be automatically archived by
189:This page is within the scope of
45:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
1589:
235:
176:
166:
148:
117:
40:Click here to start a new topic.
1808:Civil procedure in South Africa
1779:Glossary of French criminal law
947:Bibb Co. Inferior Court v. Orrs
205:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Law
2120:07:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
1693:Good article reassessment for
1487:This might be of interest to @
1337:Good article reassessment for
750:Good article reassessment for
464:Good article reassessment for
1:
2073:21:11, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
2059:21:03, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
2041:21:00, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
2026:20:32, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
1997:20:28, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
1974:20:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
1947:05:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
1920:00:28, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
1900:01:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
1878:00:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
1864:17:54, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
1772:17:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
1750:03:05, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
37:Put new text under old text.
1525:The name of the decision is
1717:20:52, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
1701:Brown v. Board of Education
1695:Brown v. Board of Education
1687:06:54, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
1679:, so I've now removed it.)
1670:05:01, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
1640:17:07, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
1617:02:47, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
1564:19:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
1548:21:07, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
1521:18:05, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
1505:20:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
1479:18:23, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
1452:23:34, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
1426:13:15, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
861:allows discussion to reach
842:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
825:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
758:Concurrent use registration
752:Concurrent use registration
2160:
2139:NA-importance law articles
2134:Project-Class law articles
1819:Standard Bank v Saunderson
1393:07:52, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
1361:01:09, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
1331:15:03, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1312:15:01, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1281:16:24, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
952:User:Jengod/Slavetraderbio
853:exist. In particular, the
88:
1909:clearly used in wikipedia
1433:Talk:Herrenvolk democracy
1381:similar laws since then?
1246:06:38, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
1231:20:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
1208:18:15, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
1176:13:27, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1157:07:14, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
1129:23:11, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
1115:22:33, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
1083:22:27, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
1068:22:17, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
1050:22:14, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
1018:22:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
994:21:53, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
969:21:38, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
933:00:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
908:16:13, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
875:19:53, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
847:proposed deletion process
774:18:20, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
742:12:12, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
724:20:47, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
705:09:04, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
692:Module:WikiProject banner
667:22:42, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
630:14:53, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
472:Jacobson v. United States
466:Jacobson v. United States
161:
143:
75:Be welcoming to newcomers
2144:WikiProject Law articles
2094:There's a discussion at
1345:Sources of Singapore law
1339:Sources of Singapore law
593:22:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
579:21:32, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
553:21:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
535:20:45, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
516:16:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
495:Bundesverfassungsgericht
488:19:08, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
459:13:34, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
208:Template:WikiProject Law
956:A. J. Orr and D. W. Orr
834:the article's talk page
2012:
1733:
1656:
1409:
1377:
1366:Request to fact check
1265:
1196:Draft:Praeterintention
1141:Potato cannon legality
891:
813:
793:
646:
616:
431:Lowercase sigmabot III
70:avoid personal attacks
1732:
1655:
1465:case be forthcoming?
1408:
1376:
1264:
977:attach their property
890:
859:articles for deletion
806:
802:proposed for deletion
792:
645:
615:
504:Knowledge (XXG):THREE
1838:judicial supervision
1761:Judicial supervision
1755:Judicial supervision
1461:Might an article on
1418:The Herald (Benison)
954:(to be published as
1840:of executive acts."
1598:William Howard Taft
1580:William Howard Taft
1095:Cora Agnes Benneson
541:Knowledge (XXG):GNG
1734:
1722:Requested move at
1657:
1645:Requested move at
1410:
1398:Requested move at
1378:
1266:
1254:Requested move at
892:
880:Requested move at
851:deletion processes
794:
658:98ššøš¶š“ššøšš
647:
635:Requested move at
617:
605:Requested move at
451:GrƄbergs GrƄa SƄng
445:Please comment at
131:content assessment
81:dispute resolution
42:
1834:Philip P. Barbour
1813:Jaftha v Schoeman
1705:reassessment page
1567:
1482:
1349:reassessment page
1164:original research
1139:Too much advice?
1099:Addie Viola Smith
913:Allbirds checking
780:Proposed deletion
762:reassessment page
476:reassessment page
449:if you can help.
438:
437:
403:
402:
227:
226:
223:
222:
219:
218:
111:
110:
61:Assume good faith
38:
2151:
1792:Our articles on
1668:
1593:
1592:
1562:
1477:
1391:
1317:Welcome aboard.
1278:
1238:Lord Bolingbroke
1200:Lord Bolingbroke
1192:praeterintention
1031:
1002:-- very helpful.
926:
844:
843:
827:
826:
791:
664:
659:
627:
433:
417:
253:
252:
239:
231:
213:
212:
209:
206:
203:
186:
181:
180:
170:
163:
162:
152:
145:
122:
121:
120:
113:
101:
16:
2159:
2158:
2154:
2153:
2152:
2150:
2149:
2148:
2124:
2123:
2092:
1981:discussed above
1979:That draft was
1957:
1954:Preterintention
1802:judicial review
1757:
1727:
1698:
1664:
1650:
1627:
1604:discussion page
1594:
1590:
1587:
1459:
1436:
1403:
1382:
1371:
1342:
1288:
1274:
1259:
1188:preterintention
1184:
1182:Preterintention
1144:
1027:
998:1. TY so much @
940:
922:
915:
885:
855:speedy deletion
841:
840:
824:
823:
789:
787:
755:
674:
657:
655:
640:
625:
610:
499:
469:
443:
429:
418:
412:
244:
210:
207:
204:
201:
200:
192:WikiProject Law
182:
175:
107:
106:
105:
104:
97:
93:
86:
56:
25:WikiProject Law
23:for discussing
12:
11:
5:
2157:
2155:
2147:
2146:
2141:
2136:
2126:
2125:
2091:
2085:
2084:
2083:
2082:
2081:
2080:
2079:
2078:
2077:
2076:
2075:
1956:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1924:
1923:
1922:
1904:
1903:
1902:
1849:
1848:
1847:
1841:
1839:
1830:
1805:
1756:
1753:
1726:
1720:
1697:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1649:
1643:
1626:
1622:Due weight at
1620:
1588:
1586:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1483:
1468:All the best:
1458:
1455:
1440:the discussion
1435:
1429:
1402:
1396:
1370:
1364:
1341:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1287:
1284:
1258:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1183:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1143:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1006:
1003:
939:
936:
914:
911:
884:
878:
865:for deletion.
845:will stop the
786:
777:
754:
748:
747:
746:
745:
744:
730:
729:jurisdictions.
673:
670:
639:
633:
609:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
498:
491:
468:
462:
442:
439:
436:
435:
423:
420:
419:
414:
410:
408:
405:
404:
401:
400:
395:
389:
388:
383:
378:
372:
371:
366:
361:
355:
354:
349:
344:
338:
337:
332:
327:
321:
320:
315:
310:
304:
303:
298:
293:
287:
286:
281:
276:
270:
269:
264:
259:
246:
245:
240:
234:
225:
224:
221:
220:
217:
216:
214:
188:
187:
171:
159:
158:
153:
141:
140:
134:
123:
109:
108:
103:
102:
94:
89:
87:
85:
84:
77:
72:
63:
57:
55:
54:
43:
34:
33:
30:
29:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2156:
2145:
2142:
2140:
2137:
2135:
2132:
2131:
2129:
2122:
2121:
2118:
2117:
2116:
2113:
2110:
2107:
2101:
2097:
2089:
2086:
2074:
2070:
2066:
2062:
2061:
2060:
2056:
2055:contributions
2052:
2048:
2044:
2043:
2042:
2038:
2034:
2029:
2028:
2027:
2023:
2022:contributions
2019:
2015:
2011:
2007:
2000:
1999:
1998:
1994:
1993:contributions
1990:
1986:
1982:
1978:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1971:
1967:
1962:
1955:
1952:
1948:
1944:
1943:contributions
1940:
1936:
1932:
1928:
1925:
1921:
1918:
1914:
1910:
1905:
1901:
1897:
1896:contributions
1893:
1889:
1885:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1876:
1872:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1861:
1860:contributions
1857:
1853:
1850:
1845:
1842:
1837:
1835:
1831:
1828:
1825:
1821:
1820:
1815:
1814:
1809:
1806:
1803:
1799:
1795:
1791:
1790:
1788:
1784:
1783:WP:DABRELATED
1780:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1770:
1766:
1762:
1754:
1752:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1739:
1731:
1725:
1721:
1719:
1718:
1714:
1710:
1706:
1702:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1685:
1682:
1678:
1677:legal science
1674:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1667:
1666:Safari Scribe
1662:
1654:
1648:
1644:
1642:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1625:
1621:
1619:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1607:. Thank you.
1606:
1605:
1600:
1599:
1585:
1581:
1578:
1565:
1561:
1560:
1557:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1519:
1516:
1512:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1502:
1501:contributions
1498:
1494:
1490:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1475:
1472:
1466:
1464:
1456:
1454:
1453:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1434:
1430:
1428:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1407:
1401:
1397:
1395:
1394:
1389:
1385:
1375:
1369:
1365:
1363:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1346:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1327:contributions
1324:
1320:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1299:
1295:
1293:
1285:
1283:
1282:
1279:
1277:
1276:Reading Beans
1271:
1263:
1257:
1253:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1228:
1227:contributions
1224:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1142:
1138:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1112:
1111:contributions
1108:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1065:
1064:contributions
1061:
1057:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1047:
1046:contributions
1043:
1039:
1035:
1030:
1025:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1004:
1001:
997:
996:
995:
991:
990:contributions
987:
983:
978:
973:
972:
971:
970:
966:
962:
957:
953:
949:
948:
937:
935:
934:
931:
930:
925:
924:Ornov Ganguly
920:
912:
910:
909:
905:
901:
897:
889:
883:
879:
877:
876:
872:
868:
864:
860:
856:
852:
848:
837:
835:
831:
820:
818:
812:
811:
805:
803:
799:
785:
781:
778:
776:
775:
771:
767:
763:
759:
753:
749:
743:
739:
735:
731:
727:
726:
725:
721:
720:contributions
717:
713:
709:
708:
707:
706:
702:
698:
693:
689:
687:
683:
679:
671:
669:
668:
665:
663:
660:
652:
644:
638:
634:
632:
631:
628:
622:
614:
608:
594:
590:
586:
585:FortunateSons
582:
581:
580:
576:
575:contributions
572:
568:
564:
560:
556:
555:
554:
550:
546:
545:FortunateSons
542:
538:
537:
536:
532:
531:contributions
528:
524:
520:
519:
518:
517:
513:
509:
508:FortunateSons
505:
496:
492:
490:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
467:
463:
461:
460:
456:
452:
448:
440:
432:
427:
422:
421:
407:
406:
399:
396:
394:
391:
390:
387:
384:
382:
379:
377:
374:
373:
370:
367:
365:
362:
360:
357:
356:
353:
350:
348:
345:
343:
340:
339:
336:
333:
331:
328:
326:
323:
322:
319:
316:
314:
311:
309:
306:
305:
302:
299:
297:
294:
292:
289:
288:
285:
282:
280:
277:
275:
272:
271:
268:
265:
263:
260:
258:
255:
254:
251:
248:
247:
243:
238:
233:
232:
229:
215:
198:
194:
193:
185:
179:
174:
172:
169:
165:
164:
160:
157:
154:
151:
147:
142:
138:
132:
128:
124:
115:
114:
100:
96:
95:
92:
82:
78:
76:
73:
71:
67:
64:
62:
59:
58:
52:
48:
47:Learn to edit
44:
41:
36:
35:
32:
31:
26:
22:
18:
17:
2114:
2111:
2108:
2105:
2103:
2093:
2003:
1958:
1926:
1817:
1811:
1787:MOS:DABENTRY
1758:
1735:
1699:
1681:SilverLocust
1658:
1628:
1602:
1596:
1595:
1554:
1534:
1530:
1526:
1469:
1467:
1460:
1437:
1411:
1379:
1343:
1300:
1296:
1292:WhatamIdoing
1289:
1275:
1267:
1191:
1187:
1185:
1149:WestRiding24
1145:
1028:
946:
945:decision in
941:
927:
916:
893:
849:, but other
838:
830:edit summary
821:
814:
808:
807:
796:The article
795:
756:
690:
675:
654:
648:
618:
557:Most modern
539:Ok, thanks.
500:
470:
444:
425:
241:
228:
211:law articles
190:
137:WikiProjects
127:project page
126:
19:This is the
1444:Ad Orientem
1386:(she/her ā¢
197:legal field
2128:Categories
2065:asilvering
2033:asilvering
1966:asilvering
1822:, neither
1559:Farmbrough
1474:Farmbrough
1304:Gobucks821
1168:Tom Morris
1034:12 Ga. 137
900:RodRabelo7
798:Law broker
784:Law broker
734:Tom Morris
697:Tom Morris
398:Archive 26
393:Archive 25
386:Archive 24
381:Archive 23
376:Archive 22
369:Archive 21
364:Archive 20
359:Archive 19
352:Archive 18
347:Archive 17
342:Archive 16
335:Archive 15
330:Archive 14
325:Archive 13
318:Archive 12
313:Archive 11
308:Archive 10
184:Law portal
1913:Altenmann
1871:Altenmann
1798:probation
1765:Altenmann
1742:Web-julio
1632:Graywalls
1609:Emiya1980
1509:Coverage
1022:The full
863:consensus
800:has been
301:Archive 9
296:Archive 8
291:Archive 7
284:Archive 6
279:Archive 5
274:Archive 4
267:Archive 3
262:Archive 2
257:Archive 1
83:if needed
66:Be polite
21:talk page
1540:James500
1535:socially
1489:James500
1215:mens rea
1024:Bluebook
919:Allbirds
242:Archives
91:Shortcut
51:get help
1927:Comment
1582:has an
1518:Snowman
1431:RfC at
1384:Qzekrom
867:Gnisacc
626:ASUKITE
426:90 days
2047:voorts
2014:voorts
2006:murder
1985:voorts
1935:voorts
1888:voorts
1884:BLARed
1852:voorts
1800:, and
1794:parole
1493:voorts
1319:voorts
1219:voorts
1121:jengod
1103:voorts
1075:jengod
1056:voorts
1038:voorts
1010:jengod
1000:Voorts
982:voorts
961:jengod
832:or on
712:voorts
567:voorts
559:SCOTUS
523:voorts
133:scale.
99:WT:LAW
2009:: -->
1961:WP:OR
1916:: -->
1874:: -->
1827:which
1768:: -->
1709:Z1720
1531:legal
1515:Giant
1353:Z1720
1286:Hello
1166:... ā
766:Z1720
480:Z1720
250:Index
125:This
79:Seek
2115:Path
2069:talk
2051:talk
2037:talk
2018:talk
1989:talk
1970:talk
1939:talk
1917:talk
1892:talk
1875:talk
1856:talk
1816:and
1769:talk
1746:talk
1713:talk
1636:talk
1613:talk
1556:Rich
1544:talk
1511:here
1497:talk
1471:Rich
1463:this
1448:talk
1422:talk
1388:talk
1357:talk
1323:talk
1308:talk
1242:talk
1223:talk
1204:talk
1172:talk
1153:talk
1125:talk
1107:talk
1097:and
1079:talk
1060:talk
1042:talk
1014:talk
986:talk
965:talk
950:for
929:TALK
904:talk
871:talk
770:talk
738:talk
716:talk
701:talk
680:and
589:talk
571:talk
549:talk
527:talk
512:talk
484:talk
455:talk
68:and
2112:hed
2109:nis
2106:Tar
2090:RfC
1931:AfD
1789:.
1785:or
1584:RfC
1442:. -
1190:or
782:of
202:Law
156:Law
2130::
2071:)
2057:)
2039:)
2024:)
1995:)
1972:)
1945:)
1933:.
1898:)
1882:I
1869:--
1862:)
1824:of
1796:,
1748:)
1715:)
1684:š¬
1638:)
1615:)
1546:)
1513:.
1503:)
1450:)
1424:)
1359:)
1329:)
1310:)
1244:)
1229:)
1206:)
1174:)
1155:)
1127:)
1113:)
1081:)
1066:)
1048:)
1032:,
1016:)
992:)
967:)
906:)
873:)
836:.
819:.
772:)
740:)
722:)
703:)
688:.
661:ā¢
591:)
577:)
565:.
551:)
533:)
514:)
486:)
457:)
49:;
2067:(
2053:/
2049:(
2035:(
2020:/
2016:(
2010:.
1991:/
1987:(
1968:(
1941:/
1937:(
1894:/
1890:(
1858:/
1854:(
1744:(
1711:(
1634:(
1611:(
1566:.
1542:(
1499:/
1495:(
1481:.
1446:(
1420:(
1390:)
1355:(
1325:/
1321:(
1306:(
1240:(
1225:/
1221:(
1202:(
1170:(
1151:(
1123:(
1109:/
1105:(
1077:(
1062:/
1058:(
1044:/
1040:(
1012:(
988:/
984:(
963:(
902:(
869:(
768:(
736:(
718:/
714:(
699:(
695:ā
587:(
573:/
569:(
547:(
529:/
525:(
510:(
497:?
482:(
453:(
139::
53:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
