Template talk:Infobox election/Archive 3

2078:| image2 = ] | party2 = Indonesian Democratic Party – Struggle | last_election2 = 153 seats, 33.74% | seats2 = 109 | seat_change2 = −41 | popular_vote2 = 21,026,629 | percentage2 = 18.53% | swing2 = -15.21% | image3 = ] | party3 = National Awakening Party | last_election3 = 51 seats, 12.61% | seats3 = 52 | seat_change3 = +1 | popular_vote3 = 11,989,564 | percentage3 = 10.57% | swing3 = -2.04% | title = Speaker | before_election = ] | before_party = Golkar | after_election = ] | after_party = Golkar }} 1493:{{Infobox Election | election_name = United Nations Security Council election, 2008 | country = United Nations | type = legislative | ongoing = no | previous_election = United Nations Security Council election, 2007 | previous_year = 2007 | next_election = United Nations Security Council election, 2009 | next_year = 2009 | seats_for_election = 5 (of 10) non-permanent seats on the ] | election_date = 17 October 2008 | map_image = UN Security Council 2009.svg | map_size = 300px | map_caption = Security Council after 2008 elections. | title = Members | before_election= {{ZAF}} <small: --> 5892:

Subsequently, you cannot necessarily determine a "win" from the results of an election. In the parliamentary system of the UK and Canada, a sitting Prime Minister does not lose his job after an election loss until he formally resigns. This is what opens the door to coalitions, etc. Saying "seats needed to win" is, in a sense, simply incorrect. A second-place party could form a coalition with another minor party and thus form a government. Would you say they "lost" the election, even though they ended up forming government? I'm much more in favour of having the "seats needed for a majority" as can now be seen on Canadian election pages.

3638:. As of now, five parties have ballot access, but only two have made their nominations. The Libertarian nominees, at the beginning of the second row (party 4), display correctly. But even though the US Taxpayers candidates are (correctly?) entered in the party 6 fields, they are displayed in the party 5 spot. This has been taken out of the article until it can be fixed, because it incorrectly suggests that the US Taxpayers nominees are actually the Green Party nominees. Suggestions on how to fix this display error? 5137: 1337: 1206: 815:

the 2000 article does, as well as the 2008 article. The 2004 article does not (when I posted the original comment). I can see the reasoning for putting the numbers in bold, as to show who won the popular vote and how it may differ from the winner in the Electoral College. However, since the popular vote has no effect on the outcome of the election, I would suggest the numbers not be in bold except when they have unusual usefulness as in the 2000 election.

1260: 31: 396:

Canadian election. But that would be true even had he lost the election. Until he informs the viceroy that he no longer wishes to lead the government, he's Prime Minister. Certainly if another party had won the election its leader would now be the Prime Minister Designate, but I honestly can't tell you whether Stephen Harper today is both the Prime Minister and the Prime Minister Desginate, or if he's just the Prime Minister. --

1283: 4947:" is certainly better than the "before election/after election" option or always displaying "-elect" by the winner's name regardless of incumbency, but I think the best choice would be to base the wording per the circumstances of each election instead of having a one-size-fits-all approach. This can be accomplished mainly in two ways: First, if the incumbent is re-elected, the wording should be "Re-elected <title: --> 2076:{{Infobox Election | election_name = Indonesian legislative election, 2004 | country = Indonesia | type = parliamentary | ongoing = no | previous_election = Indonesian legislative election, 1999 | previous_year = 1999 | next_election = Indonesian legislative election, 2009 | next_year = 2009 | seats_for_election = All 550 seats of the ] and<br/: --> 1832: 1301: 554: 1454: 724:

does, as well as the 2008 article. The 2004 article does not. I can see the reasoning for putting the numbers in bold, as to show who won the popular vote and how it may differ from the winner in the Electoral College. However, since the popular vote has no effect on the outcome of the election, I would suggest the numbers not be in bold except when they have unusual usefulness as in the

1436: 1418: 1382: 1319: 1400: 1355: 4851:, for instance: Stephen Harper was prime minister before the election, which his Conservative Party subsequently won. The prime minister's commission was never withdrawn; he did not thus become prime minister-designate, he just stayed prime minister. The only case in which "prime minister-designate" would be appropriate is if the incumbent prime minister's party 3379:. In that election, Horace Greeley and others founded the Liberal Republican Party and they nominated him as their candidate. Later the Democrats, wanting anybody-but-Grant, decided to nominate Greeley as well. So the infobox should list Grant as Republican and Greeley as both Liberal Republican and Democratic. As mentioned above, that does not work. 4958:" should be a third option for certain occasions, such as when an incumbent dies or resigns and then the person who succeeds them wins a subsequent term of their own. We cannot say "re-elected" then even though the person was an incumbent because they were never technically elected to the position in question in the first place (an example being the 4743:

words. This has been exacerbated in this case because the end result is still yet to be declared more than a week after the election (the leaders having to negotiate with individual members of parliament to form a majority). I have suggested, in the meantime, that the "Prime Minister-elect" section simply be blanked (as shown

4738:. The problem here seems to lie particularly in this case where there are two parties mentioned: the one on the left is the incumbent (who also appears roughly above the listing for "Incumbent Prime Minister") and the other on the right is the challenger (who appears above the listing for "Prime Minister-elect"). Although 1643:, as the election campaign is imminent, and the effect of this is POV. Can someone please explain why it's doing that - it doesn't do it in the sample infobox of Bush etc overleaf - or please just make the correction (and allow for two other party leaders, unless that's as simple as just adding more party3= etc fields. 5661:

seems to have disrupted the way the the seats_for_election parameter displays. As I recall, it used to be centered, but that is not the case now. What's more, it is small and left-justified, but a link for opinion polls appears below it centered and full-sized. I doubt that's the right place to put a

3983:

Hello. Just one voice to say or add to any others that this template is really too wide to sit beside the start of an article. At 1152 by 864 on a 19" monitor, it can squeeze the text to less than 10 words per line. Instead, how about making it the width of the article and placing the article's first

3843:

One of the most glaring omissions in this infobox is the lack of a prominent link to a list of MPs elected in the election. There are prominent links to the list of MPs elected at the previous and next elections, but not to those elected at the election which the infobox is summarising. I'm sure that

2077:

991:

I don't see how the number of states carried has any effect on the winner of the election. The popular vote does, as the popular vote winner in each state gets its electoral votes. In contrast, the number of states won really has no effect on the outcome of the election. You can win with as little as

814:

because it was getting no replies. Should popular vote winners' totals be in bold in the election infobox? There seems to be no real consistency among the 2000, 2004, and 2008 presidential election articles. No earlier election articles have the popular vote winners' total and percentage in bold, but

395:

I don't know. The Prime Minister continues to be the Prime Minister until he resigns - in all cases - which is why the viceroy first asks him if he can form a government, regardless of the election outcome. So, for example, Prime Minister Stephen Harper is still Prime Minister following yesterday's

4307:

I don't think it's really "misleading" if it's just in the hidden code, but ideally it could be more neutral wording (e.g., "person" to cover any elected office for an individual). I imagine that the template would still need to recognise the current options so that existing articles still function

4190:

Yes, up to five columns seems too wide nearly all the time, especially on a smaller screen. But why not have the nutshell summary, i.e. without the pics and stats, on display by default with a 'more' or 'show' link to include the pics and stats if and when the reader wants to see them (soon learning

3408:

This template is used for party leadership elections as well as standard presidential and parliamentary elections. In a party leadership election, all candidates are members of the same party, so the requirement to specify a party to allow images to display forces editors to choose between not using

3010:

While the width of this infobox is generally ok for view via a normal web browser, it is almost impossible to see the whole infobox via the iPhone/iTouch application. The optimal width of the info box should be 239px. I understand it will take a lot of work to change every thing, but it is important

2750:

more so than the words in the title and bold in the open paragraph? The user still knows the country this is related to by reading the words. If they want to learn about the flag they can go to flag of x. Why include the flag here and not the seal or coat of arms or a map. This is not a long list or

2564:

Is there any place in the Infobox to place a link to the link to MPs after the current election? You can use previous_mps & next_mps to provide a link to the MPs elected in the previous & next elections, but I haven't found anyway to link to the list of current MPs. Maybe this can be a link

5805:

Still not sure we're on the same page. The concern brought up at the Canadian election (and subsequently the Alberta election), is that the term "seats needed" isn't clear if it is the seats needed to win the election, or to win over 50% of the seats. Since there is no way to say how many seats are

5509:

Is there anyway we can change the previous holder's title like we can the "posttitle"? I mean where it says "President before election" (or "Incumbent President" in ongoing elections), can a template function be added to make that variable if need be? I was trying on the sandbox, but I couldn't get

5009:

If a custom posttitle is desired, the posttitle parameter can be used. But this discussion is to determine the many uses that don't use the posttitle parameter. An if statement can be introduced to determine if the before guy and after guy are the same, but as you stated, this would be incorrect if

4821:

It could, but I don't think it should. I think that the incumbent is important (certainly notable) information worth having. Aside from more obvious reasons, it may help to interpret the data in terms of "seats needed": the incumbent may well not need any seats, and seeing their name/party listed

1778:

As there were no objections to my suggestion, I have made the additions. The changes were tested in Sandbox prior to making the changes. I have also verified the election pages of a few countries to ensure that it looks fine. In the unlikely event anyone notices something going crazy, please revert

1736:

template, which I have now done for that article. The problem is not actually the infobox, but a result of it and the Iceland government template both pushing down into the next sections. This is a problem that could happen with any templates or images (but obviously comes into play more often with

1193:

as a guinea pig, and for the most part it works just fine. However, the template has the annoying "To be determined" thing pop at the bottom, which confuses the living daylights out of me. Can anyone inform me why, and how I can get around it? I've posted the template and my filling of the infobox.

766:

and point to this thread so editors are not only aware of it but also in need to comment here if they think or feel different and would like to reach a different consensus. Till then I consider the template example as consensus which should be applied to all affected articles w/o exceptions (unless

325:

I agree but wording is an issue. "New PM" is not great because if the incumbent party wins, he simply remains PM. Also, to be precise, a new PM would need to be appointed some time following the election. Possibly "Next PM" could work though it still hints a little at a change in leader. "Following

5974:

legislative session. That has nothing to do with elections, whether the Conservatives chose to dissolve or were forced to dissolve. You are also incorrect in saying the UK Conservatives lost the 2010 election. I'm not going through my entire explanation again, but simply not being able to attain a

5914:

Actually, this is worse in proportional systems, as no party can win a majority of seats -- by default, everyone loses. You lose leverage in a minority or coalition government, if a party controls a majority of the seats, it can do what it wishes (as is in Japan during the LDP's heyday when policy

5609:

Please make it possible to introduce the fields "Nominee" and "run_mate" for the type "Parliamentary". We will have a parliamentary election, the European Parliament election in 2014, with presidential nominees (candidates for Commission president) who won't be party leaders or parliamentary group

5387:

By all means have "Last election" appearing after "Seats won" and "Seat change", but I do not think that we should remove it entirely. One side effect is that there is no longer any indication of the seats won at the last election in the case of future/ongoing elections where there is no data for

4754:

In light of this, I propose that the template be amended so that the next leader section be omitted when the name is left blank. That is, instead of defaulting to "TBD", it is not shown at all (nor is the heading "-elect"). If you wanted to include this in a particular instance, you could simply

4742:

showed "Prime Minister-elect" as "To be determined", some people appear to have taken this at a glance to imply that the person named on the right (in this case, opposition leader Tony Abbott) is the "Prime Minister-elect" because his photo and stats appear on the same side of the infobox as those

2820:

Limiting the number of parties to 6 seems a bit arbitrary as we have no space for almost half the parties, even more problematic one of the Vice Prime Ministers (Andre Rouvoet) is the leader of a small coalition party that is in numbers at place 7 in the representation. The limitation to 6 parties

1586:

Once a candidate gains the 12% milestone, he or she will remain in the infobox until the election. This assumes the candidate is running around that figure and has not lost support entirely due to some scandal, gaffe, etc. If support drops below 6.6% (see ) then discussion should ensue on the talk

723:

Should popular vote winners' (in the United States) totals be in bold in this infobox? There seems to be no real consistency among the 2000, 2004, and 2008 presidential election articles. No earlier election articles have the popular vote winners' total and percentage in bold, but the 2000 article

346:

Canada generally refers to the leader of the newly elected governing party as the Prime Minister - Designate. The same is true of new party leaders chosen for govening parties. Until actually named Prime Minister by the monarch or viceroy, that new leader is the Prime Minister Designate. Online

186:

I agree that this is nonsensical; for many elections in proportional election systems, this distinction does not make sense, as often the first party forms a coalition with the second party. (Or even the third party forming a coalition with the second party, as in Austria after the 1999 election.)

4700:

I have now fixed the glitch! It seems that the glitch may have derived from the sandbox, somewhere in the listings of the 4th, 5th and 6th parties, as the glitch disappeared when these lines were removed from the template. I copied the whole template from the original to the sandbox and all now

4152:

That would be a band-aid solution at best. The simple fact is that the template contains a lot of textual data and it's organised into five table columns. With that layout, there will always be cases where the template gets very wide. In the long run it may be worth looking into moving to putting

2931:

No problem perse. But you will have to adapt the picture though. If you want to use puppets (like you do in spain) the image should automatically (based on a single parameter) recallibrate based on number of representaties (e.g. in the Netherlands the image should only depict 150 representative).

2716:

Actually, I think these flags do have a non-trivial identification value. Yes, they're not strictly necessary since the name of the country/state/city/etc. is part of the article title, in large bold text at the top of the page, but I don't think it is as irrelevant and distracting as other flag

1757:

In the context of Indian elections, most governments at both the centre and the states are run by coallitions rather than by a single party. It would be great if this Infobox permits us to add the "Alliance" in addition to the existing "Party" field. This new field can be non-mandatory so that it

4422:

This is for the activation for some of the parameters on the template. For example, "seats won" won't appear if you choose "presidential." I think the difference between "legislative" and "parliamentary" is that the "number 1" party is labeled as "majority party" in legislative while it's called

4386:

I think the issue raised here is providing neutral wording options. For example, for elections for senators, mayors, governors, congressmen, etc., why use the word "presential" (which literally refers to presidents); can we have neutral wording such as "person" or "individual" that could apply

900:

The 1888 presidential election article's infobox is interesting - the higher electoral vote total is in bold, and the higher popular vote total and percentage are in bold, but the higher state total is not in bold. We should try to make the infoboxes from each election more consistent with each

5891:

You cannot judge who "wins" an election in a single-member plurality system, especially not by defining a win as only achieving a majority. You do not need a majority to "win" an election under SMP, you simply need a plurality of the seats. It does not matter if it is a minority or a majority.

1103:

The fact that a candidate could lose the election with 39 states and DC does not mean that the candidate's number of states carried does not matter. A candidate could lose the election with 75% of the popular vote, but that does not mean that the popular vote does not matter. Just the same, a

4705:

had some inconsistencies between the comparisons (e.g., one example had a different flag year on only one side, two examples had the last/next leader info missing on one side) which made it appear as though the sandbox version had a glitch when in fact the glitch was in the testcases. I have

2100:

I removed the "current election" box as it should not be part of an infobox. It was also throwing hundreds of elections into the current category (e.g. NZ 2011), not to mention the problem with dating the box. If there's consensus we can reintorduce it, but it's a hack, albeit a clever one.

4565:

This could perhaps be tied in with the previous and next parties/leaders, although this may lead to complications in cases where the leader is changed between elections, e.g., if a leader dies, is impeached, etc., would the elected leader or the person who replaced them (or both) be named?

923:

I believe the best method would be to not have either the popular vote total/percentage or the number of states won in bold, unless the candidate who wins the election does not win the popular vote. Then the popular vote total and percentage should be in bold. It wouldn't cause too much

5820:

I don't think the Canadian or the UK Conservatives "won" their respective elections anyway; otherwise the Canadians would not have formed a minority government, and their UK counterparts would've not formed a coalition with the Lib Dems. It's like saying no party "won" the election.

1576:

The party candidate must exceed 12% of the nationwide popular vote in any one of the following polls: ABC News, Associated Press, CNN, Fox News, Gallup, Ipsos, Los Angeles Times, New York Times, CBS News, NBC News, MSNBC, Newsweek, Time Magazine, US News & World Report, or USA

3552:

United States presidential elections, there is only one candidate who "deserves" to be included in the infobox. But if only one candidate is included, you get extra whitespace between a number of the fields. Does anyone know why this occurs, or know of a fix for the problem? —

3127:

You're not entirely correct. Yes, we removed some parameters, but although the final template may be as large than the one you use with all the parameters, it is also thinner, and you don't have the problem described in the "Template too wide to sit beside text" section below.

4881:

I realize that the winner of the election does not become the leader immediately after the election. But the problem is the term "-elect", this term is not used when the incumbent leader gets voted back in. I don't know of any better wording than "after election", any ideas?

3757:

What, precisely, do you want "put backed"? Most of the changes that have been made are to make the code more manageable and the template more consistent and easy to follow. Individual changes can be discussed, but the whole lot isn't going to be reverted without good reason.

1074:(outdent) Ok. As for the electoral vote there is no question about it to leave it in bold as is. Right? Everything else is a matter of personal preference and since personal preferences shouldn't be a factor in an encyclopedia we could just leave the whole rest "un-bolded".-- 837:

I agree. Our election system doesn't recognize the popular vote to determine the winner and therefore it would give to much weight bolding them in the infobox. We have them (besides others) in bold in the more detailed tables further down the article and that should do

4487:

It's OK to leave it. If one has to use this template they look it up at the parameters list. Mostly the legislative/parliamentary types are only used in general/legislative election articles while special/by-elections and single winner elections use the presidential.

5247:

Looks good. I'm just curious how this will look with additional fields such as turnout filled out, as none of the examples in the sandbox show this. Could someone edit/create an example will every possible data field completed so that we can see how this appears?

4238:

In these cases (examples below), what I've seen is that the "presidential" option is selected. But why mislabel something? Why not add the option of "gubernatorial" and "senatorial" (among others) to the available choices? A gubernatorial or senatorial election is

4426:

In any case these three do not appear on the template so I don't think there's no harm done. If we'd making one for mayor, congressman, governor, etc. it is redundant, and if we'll change "presidential" you'd have to change hundreds of articles it's not worth it.

4526:

The placement of the flag between the years of the previous and subsequent elections seems to be confusing rather than arbitrary. It almost seems as if the flag represents the period between those years. Perhaps the years could be more clearly displayed thus:

4353:

For a single-winner election (e.g. election for senator, mayor, governor, congressman, president), use presidential. For congressional/parliamentary/legislative elections, use legislative when there is a majority party, and use parliamentary when there isn't.

1553: 5906:

If a party did not a majority, then it lost the election. UK Conservatives lost the election, hence they formed a coalition government with the Lib Dems. If any party forms a coalition, or forms a minority government, it lost the election. There are times

3382:

Although the word alliance is not really appropriate here, I tried to see if I could get that to work. Unfortunately, if there is no "alliance1" defined, then "alliance2" is ignored, and I cannot figure a way to define "alliance1" so that it renders as

2543:, with the image/colors not displayed. I realized the parameter "party1" is defined twice in the sample template, first for the main candidate, and then for the minor candidate. I removed part of that section, and now the template is working fine. -- 1684:

In many cases, this will be inappropriate. As I type this in late April 2009, the Indonesian legislative election can be considered "ongoing", as the counting is still taking place, but it certainly isn't "forthcoming", since the voting is finished.

2974:

looks ugly right now, and I can't easily fill out the remaining two slots, because three smaller parties got 3 MPs (HDSSB, IDS, SDSS), and yet another one got 2 MPs but was in coalition with one of the top four (HSLS) so it was even more important.

5465:) won't be until 2014, and since the outcome of this year's is still forthcoming, no one is talking about the inevitable 2014 race yet. Since red links encourage article creation, the reason this template doesn't generate them is probably to avoid 309:

Can someone more acquainted than I am with Mediawiki's arcane syntax change "PM-Elect" for British general elections? "New PM" would perhaps work. The concept of "Prime Minister-Elect" is nonsensical, as Prime Ministers are appointed, not elected.

5949:

With the way the dissolution was handled, it almost certain correct to say they lost that election, otherwise it wouldn't be dissolved in that manner (it could've been dissolved, but the Conservatives could've chosen when to dissolve parliament).

5073:

carries other issues about the legitimacy of being declared a "winner" in a parliamentary election, particularly in cases where there is a slim majority or even a minority of votes (with a majority of seats, in a coalition, etc.). I suggest that

6040:

seat which can be via plurality -- as laws can only be passed via a majority vote, and if you don't win majority of the seats, you'd lose the election, and you'd have to ask for help from someone else, or in Canada's case, hope and pray the MPs

3493:

No. I started watching this template well after the original write, so I figured there was a reason why they wanted a colour for the image. In my opinion I think that there should always be a colour, I think it represents the candidate well.

1525:

I've figured out the problem: it appears that "after_party" is a required field, which auto-fills to "To Be Determined" when not filled. Can this be changed? Alternately, can there be some mechanism for leaving it completely blank? Thanks!

4467:

I agree it's not a big issue as it's hidden in the background, but if it can be built in as an alternative option (e.g., so that "person" has the same effect as "presidential") so it continues to work on existing articles, it'd be nice.

3478:

That only partially answers the problem. Instead of unnecessarily repeating the party name and colour, it only unnecessarily repeats the colour. Would it be exceedingly complex to make it so that images show without including either one?

4191:

that the text will then be squashed but the template can then be collapsed back to the nutshell state again). Why would this be band-aid rather than a good solution? Other sidebox-style templates I've seen here use collapsing sections.

5456:

I suppose it may not generate an automatic red link because some elections may be too far in the future to garner the required threshold of significant coverage by reliable sources to even begin work on the article. For example, the

5366:

Yes this is ridiculous. It has last election and then the change, expecting you to do arithmetic based off the least important number in the infobox. It would be better to remove last election entirely than to have the current joke.

1552:, there was a big dispute over which party nominees should be listed in the infobox. I suggest implementing the below text above the notes section so that we have a set standard for something like this. The below is adapted from 4846:

I believe one of the more concerning problems with the template is the misrepresentation of an incumbent prime minister as "prime minister-elect" or "prime minister-designate" after an election that his or her party won. Regard

6095:"Seats contested" won't work, because there may be some where the writ was dropped, but no one contested it, and was won by acclamation. This isn't the case anymore, but the infobox needs to be usable for historical elections. 5681:

I've noticed it too, but it just started today. I am hoping it is just an update in the wiki software, and will be remedied soon. The information box on images saved at the commons don't appear on Knowledge (XXG) today either.

670:? It is already used in these articles, but the wording of the infobox parameters suggests that it is only for elections nationally. It is also NOT used in the state election articles for the 2004 presidential election (see 6035:

Eh sure, I can be settled on "Seats needed for a majority" but the only way to win any legislative election, single-seat or multi-seat constituencies, is by winning majority of the seats -- this is different from winning

5856:

True too, but whatever the king/queen/representative has to say has no bearing on the election that had just happened. Anyway, aside from the seats needed to win, perhaps other stuff needs to be added like voter turnout.

4291:

The case for a "gubernatorial" and a "senatorial" option are just thoughts that I have decided to post here. If for any reason there should not be added these options, please let me know why and how I'm wrong. Thank you!

3298:

I am unfamiliar with the politics of Germany, I didn't know one candidate could have several parties. If there was only two parties you could use the alliance parameter, but you want to show three for Wulff. Your options

2751:

anything else the MOSICON says is acceptable. It's nationalist pride and territory marking. Why don't we add flag to every article that has the word Ireland or France or whatever in the name for identification value?

3999:

This template uses the standard infobox meta template that all infoboxes uses. If its larger than normal, then its due to large candidate pictures or map image. Where did you see this larger than normal infobox?

2152:

Sorry to be awkward, but I'm still kind of waiting on an answer here. If anybody can help in any way, or can direct me to the talk page of somebody who may be able to help, it'd be very much appreciated. Thanks!

5841:

True, no party has "won" the election until the Queen (or her representative) says they can makeup the government. That is why I (and the others who convinced me) avoid the word "won", and prefer "majority".

462:

The proper term should be 'Prime Minister-Designate" not "Prime Minister-Elect." Next PM, etc. is not a proper term. Can someone fix this? I'm not sure how and it appears to be something beyond our powers.

3871: 3861: 1758:

does not impact those elections where the concept of Alliances does not exist. If there are no violent objections to this idea, I shall try to add this parameter into this template shortly in the future.

894:, in which articles the popular vote winner's totals are in bold), but it would seem inconsistent to me to only have the popular vote total and percentage in bold in such a small number of articles. 3028:

The size of the box is dependent on the size of the candidate pictures or map added to the box. If you don't like the way wikipedia looks on a phone you'll have to take it up with Knowledge (XXG).

2857: 1796: 2073:, the leader is not as significant as the party itself. It doesn't make sense to be using this field since the winning party doesn't necessarily make its leader the speaker/chair of the assembly. 4799:

I'm not sure why it is necessary while the election is ongoing for either the before or after to be shown. The entire last section could be left off until "ongoing" is set to "no", couldn't it? -

3946: 5563:

For what election is "{title} before election", an inappropriate phrase? Infoboxes are intended to provide constancy across the English Knowledge (XXG), I don't see how it could be a problem.

4235:. It seems misleading, considering the fact that this template is also used on elections not of those specific types, such as on United States Senate and U.S. gubernatorial election articles. 2069:

Hello. I'm wondering if someone can help me edit the infobox since I'm not familiar with infobox markup syntax. I want to make the party name bold in the absence of the party leader field. In

4608:

developed a glitch that inserted blank space at the top of some (but not all) articles that contain the infobox. If anyone has any solutions, please feel free to have at it. Thanks also to

4223:

This election template appears to be the standard template for use in a verity of elections. However, I am a bit perplexed at the limited choices to fill-in for the template's "Type" field:

3187:), and for some reason the elected MPs are missing. I suggest that, if we cannot find a consistent, legible and user-friendly way of including the "members" links, they ought to be omitted. 6063:

BTW, if we're settling into "seats needed for a majority" (which probably means differently in many places), I suggest using two columns instead of one, like normal infoboxes. For example:

671: 2896: 5435:

If the article for the next election (parameter "next_election") doesn't exist, why isn't a red link included? Why not use a link to encourage creation of a new article? According to

5392:

for an example. If there is consensus to omit "Last election", then it should be hidden when there is data for "Seats won"/"Seat change" but shown otherwise (not deleted altogether).

4901:"? This would be equally applicable whether the incumbent is (re-)elected or a challenger is elected. Bear in mind also that this can be customised in individual cases if necessary. 1167:{{#if:{{{{{#if:{{{nominee4|}}}|nominee|candidate}}4|}}}|{{!}} {{!}} {{{{{#if:{{{nominee4|}}}|nominee|candidate}}4}}} }} 1161:{{#if:{{{{{#if:{{{nominee4|}}}|nominee|candidate}}4|}}}|{{!}} {{!}} {{#ifeq:{{{ongoing|}}}|yes||'''}}{{{{{#if:{{{nominee4|}}}|nominee|candidate}}4}}}{{#ifeq:{{{ongoing|}}}|yes||'''}}}} 3606:

Thanks for your efforts. I've been meaning to take a look at the template code, but I don't relish the thought and I've been avoiding it. If you can fix it, you would make my day. —

5044:"Winning candidate," I suppose, could work for all uses. It's not a posttitle, just a simple declaration of the winner. Beyond that, I don't really have anything else at the moment.-- 3950: 2718: 5180:

above, I re-worked it to be more like previous/next chronology lists in other infoboxes, and also like the incumbent/next leaders at the bottom of this infobox. Other suggestions?

3717:

I can see the offending code, but it isn't working properly (the conditional always passes). I don't know why, but at any rate the bolding was never documented so I've removed it.

1170:(which looks pretty much like the rows for nominee5 and nominee6, and IMO this is the desired outcome). This shouldn't create any problems, but i'm announcing it just in case. -- 2947:

Thank you, I'll do the changes shortly. I don't mean to add automatically the image, someone will have to make the picture in Commons for each election; I will only add a second

663: 622:

Hi all. It slightly bothers me that all of the US election boxes use the current 50-star flag, and not the one that was in use at the time. I poked around a bit and found that

5150:

above), it looks a bit barren now. Should we perhaps it out by adding provision for links to other articles about elections/politics for the country/state/etc.? For example:

675: 667: 6060:, stating that "The Conservative Party, led by David Cameron, won the largest number of votes and seats", not "The Conservative Party, led by David Cameron, won the election." 5154:

I don't see the purpose of having the flag and years on separate rows. Now the flag doesn't have anything beside it, and there is a space between the before and after years.

4283: 897:

Also, states. If the popular vote total is not bold, then neither should the higher number of states carried be in bold, as that number does not determine the winner either.

3541: 4950: 4273: 3095:

In the Spanish Knowledge (XXG), I modified your infobox into a vertical design, instead of the horizontal one used still in the English Knowledge (XXG). How about if you

3410: 2169:{{!}} colspan=2 {{!}} {{!}}{{!}} {{#if:{{{image1|}}}|{{{image1}}}}} {{!}}{{!}}{{#if:{{{image2|}}}|{{{image2}}}}} {{!}}{{!}} {{#if:{{{image3|}}}|{{{image3}}}}} {{!}}- }} 1100:

A candidate's number of states carried affects the outcome of the election because carrying states gives the candidate electoral votes, which are what ultimately matter.

167:

Then perhaps there should be an option added instead weather to include government/opposition or not, because in most cases the second place party is the opposition. --

3876: 3984:

paragraph or two of the article above it and the rest of the article below it? And/or maybe make it (partially) collapsed so it doesn't squeeze the text by default.

1104:

candidate could lose the election while carrying more than 75% of the states, but that does not mean that the candidate's number of states carried does not matter.

2765:

The seals and coat of arms are more often non-free or copyrighted, and cannot be placed on any article other than the country/state/city and the article on itself.

507:

I've added a parameter "posttitle", which, if used, designates what the term is for the "victor". If not used, it is the same as it was before: {{{title}}}-elect.

4966:

re-election) because she took over in 2004 upon the resignation of the state's previous governor). So in conclusion, I support three possibilities for the field:

4278: 3184: 1230: 1220: 1190: 755: 4747:) to avoid any such implication. There seems to be no particular value including it if there is no real data to include there anyway, particularly if including 626:

has a "variant=" attribute which can set the correct flag, but that the election infobox template currently has no way to pass such an attribute to Flagicon.

5806:

needed to win, we went with the statement of how many seats are needed for a majority. Is the term "326 seats needed for a majority" not correct in the UK?

5322:

It would be simpler to find out the number of seats at a glance by showing the current results first. This is the case when most new results are presented.

886:

I see the usefulness of having the popular vote total and percentage in bold in the 2000 article (and, perhaps, the articles for the elections elections of

678:). I am thinking that it probably should not be used, but does anyone else have any knowledge on where exactly this infobox should and shouldn't be placed? 2613:

I feel this is misleading as the term implies that the leader is currently in office wheras at the time of the election that is not necessarily the case.

1927: 1688:

Perhaps it would be better to have separate flags within the Infobox for congoing or forthcoming, or perhaps the message on the tag needs to be changed.

3073:(1) Actually, the size of the photos could be fixed and the infobox could be reorganized to fit 239px. and its not the way wikipedia looks, but the way 4954: 4263: 3549: 3545: 3376: 2135: 2131: 1792: 1549: 1427: 1328: 958: 891: 887: 725: 2719:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums#RFC: Removing flag icons from templates in Category:Election and referendum year templates

5462: 4959: 4253: 4118:

In that case, please make the template or at least parts of it collapsed by default. If that's likely to be accepted, I'll have a try at it myself.

3875:

in that contest would lead the reader to expect a link to a list of constituencies, not a list of MPs. (In the UK context, the list of seats is at

2575: 1808: 1768: 143: 89: 81: 76: 64: 59: 6118: 6084: 5959: 5924: 5866: 5830: 5794: 5747: 4585:

OK, I have just made this change, after testing on the sandbox page seemed to work for all of the test cases. Hopefully everyone is OK with this.

4497: 4436: 4363: 213:

Erm, no -- right now, the majority is against using "government" and "opposition", because it doesn't make sense in most systems. Stop reverting. —

5975:

majority does NOT translate into an election loss under the single-member plurality system, which is the electoral system Canada and the UK uses.

5093:

parameter of the infobox — but IMHO, coding these into the infobox template for an array of situations would be overly involved and unnecessary.

3280: 3142:

And as I mentioned below, this box is the same width as other infoboxes on the English Knowledge (XXG), unless expanded by big portraits or maps.

1631:

these labels display above those of the leaders of teh two parties so far listed (the template, if not already with room for it, needs to display

1628: 5217:

Upon further examination, I have realized that without "previous election", the first column, with the row titles, gets squished, I now propose

4308:

correctly. I'm only a noob to templates, so I'm not sure how difficult it would be to factor in different options which have the same effect.

3653:

Filling in "TBA" for blank parties works for now. The conditional code needs some bulletproofing to detect this; I'll try to have a look later.

2721:, the tiny icons on the bottom-of-page navbox are redundant and useless if there is a larger sized identification flag in this infobox. But if 5173: 4735: 3865: 3670:

Thanks. I notice now that the nominee1 appears bolded, and I'm guessing this is somewhere in the template formatting? Is there a fix for that?

1710: 1079: 1053: 1039: 843: 774: 5461:

is two years away, but so major that it is already discussed by reliable sources. However, the next Connecticut gubernatorial election (after

957:

Timmeh, when the winner does not carry the highest number of states, do you think that the loser's highest number of states be in bold, as in

6053: 6049: 5724: 4070: 4054: 3965: 3921: 3856: 3635: 3175: 2971: 2590: 2197: 1856: 1846: 1788: 2443:

Is it possible to modify this template to allow for any number of candidates to be included, Possible array of multiples of three per row?

4258: 4192: 4119: 4058: 3985: 3246: 2207: 5587:

We have an option for seats and electoral votes, but should we also add the option of delegates for primaries and leadership contests? -

1709:

At present, this infobox (which can get quite long), doesn't treat edit links for article sections correctly. The problem can be seen at

6013: 5389: 5284: 4702: 3062: 1391: 1292: 608: 590: 5176:

that the flag was out of place being between the years, as if the flag represented the present election. Therefore, as I discussed at

4946:

Is there a way for the template to be amended so wording could be determined on a case-by-case basis? The above "Elected <title: -->

5696:

I still don't know why that happened, the cell started with an !, and should have been centred and bolded by that, but its fixed now.

4874: 4658: 3778: 3585:...and reverted. It might not be possible to fix this without resorting to using HTML rather than wikicode; I'll keep trying, though. 3523: 3258: 3239: 3217: 3188: 1155:

Speaking of "only winner in bold"... i think there was some copy-pasting that made person#4 become bold too. I'm thinking of changing:

4387:

equally (and unambiguously) to all of these options? And similarly for the other options (I'm still not clear on the distinction).

3242:, but find it very difficult to use, because the candidates are supported by several parties, which makes the template look like this 5316: 4856: 4734:

Currently, when the next leader is not completed, this defaults to "TBD". However, this has led to some confusion, as discussed at

3250: 2332: 1463: 1445: 1409: 1364: 1346: 1310: 1075: 1049: 1035: 839: 770: 470: 6012:

HTD: it doesn't matter if you are correct or not about the terminology used in the UK. The infobox needs to be universal. How does

532:

I think we should add additional parameters for the seats held prior to election and the seat change due to the election itsef. --

5315:

I find it a bit confusing that the seats won in the last election come before the seats won in the election being discussed, e.g.

1870: 5626: 2337: 102:

These terms shout not be used as it does not make clear if it referring to the state of the parties before or after the election

2130:

parameter? It could be useful in articles for elections with subarticles discussing the election in specific areas, for example

5760: 5458: 4848: 4706:

implemeneted the new version and checked several articles that contain the template and they all seem to be working fine now.

3254: 2586: 2420: 2413: 1876: 1244: 5107: 4769: 1635:). My concern is the "First Party, Second Party" gives a POV impression of the party's rankings and projected results. This 5663: 4057:, then, when I visited the template's own page here, realized that just about all instances would squeeze the text too much. 2516: 2463: 47: 17: 3442:

I'm sorry, but I have no idea what that means. Ideally, no colour and no party would display as they would be superfluous. -

3113:

A number of parameters have been removed, with the addition of those, and a full six candidates, it would be just as long.

198:

Well, until someone adds a way to customize the labels (since I don't know wikipedia code), I'm going to undo this edit. --

3692:

This wasn't something I changed. I don't see that this is intentional, however; I'll have a look and see if I can fix it.

2736: 2497: 1784: 244:

It'd be great if there was a field in this template for voter turnout - can someone with template skillz through it in? --

152: 108: 5759:

Actually you are wrong. A party can win without a majority of the seats. Are you perhaps proposing what is being used on

2895:

I would like to add a diagram with the final composition of the chamber, just like I did in the Spanish Knowledge (XXG),

1560:

Candidates must surpass the following requirements in order to be listed in the infobox prior to a presidential election:

5935:

That isn't how we see it in Canada, the Canadian Conservatives won the 2008 election, but with a minority of the seats.

3747: 2814: 2571: 1804: 1780: 1764: 1612: 1141: 1003: 935: 826: 739: 689: 410:

He remains PM until losing confidence of the House, there is no re-swearing ceremony or anything; he just continues on.

3851:), where the suggestion was made to include a link in the seats_for_election field, but that's inadequate in two ways: 1912: 3202:

It's because the MPs in the next election haven't been elected yet. Look at the previous elections, they're centered.

2685: 2653: 868:

The only number that makes a difference is the electoral college vote and that is the only one that should be bold.

704:

Could we have a parameter to indicate the speaker of the house being elected at the time of a legislative election?

3096: 2702:

They are not decorative, and something does happen when you click on them, (it should go to the country's article).

2519:

as my model. The template there doesn't seem to use the colour fields at all. Thanks for sorting it out, though.

1713:, where there are three edit links pushed to the bottom of the infobox instead of appearing at its left-hand side. 38: 2565:

below the flag? That way the link is placed in between the links to the previous MPs & next MPs. Any thoughts?

5592: 3961: 3917: 2106: 1695: 873: 811: 763: 4088:

The pictures are already small in those two articles. I don't think there is anything that can be made smaller.

2917:

can already be used to add an image to the infobox. But if you want two images in an infobox, I see no problem.

2688:

says using flags should have an Encyclopaedic purpose. These are purely decorative and don't help the reader .

2142:

parameter would be enough, but I'm afraid I'm not knowledgeable or confident enough to add it myself. Thanks. —

5970:

That's completely incorrect. When you refer to dissolution that means they lost confidence of the House in the

5662:

link to opinion polls, but it does help demonstrate what's wrong with the other parameter. For an example, see

5474: 5049: 4984: 4336: 4297: 4123: 4062: 3989: 3262: 1932: 292: 261: 5351:

I can implement this in a few weeks if there is consensus or at least no significant objection here. Thanks,

4196: 3079:

looks on the iPhone/iTouch. (2) Taking it up with Apple will do nothing as this has nothing to do with Apple.

2932:

This is probably fairly advanced programming. The alternative would be the much more boring "half pie chart".

5487:

Yeah, that's exactly it. I removed it because too often articles for future elections are created too early.

767:

there is a clear valid reason and different consensus reached on one (affected article's talk page to do so).

5911:

party can win an election. The government formation is not a part of the election process if no one wins it.

5785:

are for. How about "outright win" or something. So apparently majority is not universal as we thought. lol –

3743: 3245:. The template seems to have one party as the only possible alternative. (one candidate is the candidate of 3183:

as the flag is off-centre, the bullet point between 2005 and members implies separation/next element (as in

3058: 2567: 2399: 2380: 2252: 1800: 1760: 1175: 604: 586: 5614: 4331:

I'm with you on being new to templates. But thank you for at least sharing your thoughts on my question. --

758: 474: 466: 6109:

You're right. What's a good word? This can be optional so that it won't screw up other articles, though. –

5588: 5128: 4948:." Second, if the incumbent is defeated or the race was open, then use the old standard of "<title: --> 4861: 4655: 3221: 3192: 2836:

I agree, now we have to select six out of eleven parties. This is not a neutral point of view in any way.—

2070: 1902: 1730: 1596:

Any candidates who do not meet these criteria may be listed in a prominent wikilink to "Other candidates."

1531: 1484: 1109: 966: 906: 537: 4672: 5546:

that would remove "before election" from the title. Because right now, I can't find any way to do that.

5123: 4158: 4037: 3937: 3809: 3763: 3722: 3697: 3658: 3590: 3573: 3287: 3270: 2524: 2486: 2471: 2448: 484:

The proper term is not -designate when the PM's party wins and he continues on as PM, as I noted above.

272:

Maybe near the top, underneath the date? That seems to be the place for the non-party-specific facts. --

5436: 5199:

How about moving the election date between the previous and next, to create a secession timeline, like

4675:. I have tried to find the source but I'm at a loss. I will be indebted to anyone who can fix this! 1907: 142:

Also the government/opposition makes no sense when the two largest parties form the government such as

4755:

write "TBD" for the name of the next leader and the heading would be shown automatically. Thoughts?

3879:). The list of MPs should be a prominent link, not buried in a misleadingly-labelled part of a phrase. 2444: 6111: 6077: 5952: 5917: 5859: 5823: 5787: 5740: 5622: 5618: 4490: 4429: 4356: 3954: 3910: 2865: 2103: 1717: 1691: 869: 519: 496: 442: 422: 387: 338: 5466: 3099:? It's way much smaller, and it can be perfectly displayed in a small mobile device like my iPhone. 2617:

would be a safer word. This is a template with wide application but I think it should be changed. --

361:

In fact, I'd edit it myself if I could figure out how, so confident am I that it's a better term. --

6138: 6134: 6124: 6104: 6100: 6090: 6029: 6025: 5984: 5965: 5944: 5940: 5930: 5901: 5886: 5882: 5872: 5851: 5847: 5836: 5815: 5811: 5800: 5776: 5772: 5753: 5705: 5701: 5691: 5687: 5675: 5647: 5643: 5630: 5596: 5572: 5568: 5558: 5537: 5533: 5514: 5496: 5492: 5478: 5470: 5450: 5420: 5416: 5406: 5378: 5360: 5296: 5292: 5262: 5230: 5226: 5212: 5208: 5194: 5163: 5159: 5053: 5045: 5019: 5015: 5010:

the before guy wasn't elected to begin with. I just want to use a term that can apply to all uses.

4988: 4980: 4929: 4925: 4915: 4891: 4887: 4836: 4808: 4794: 4720: 4689: 4662: 4633: 4626: 4599: 4580: 4503: 4482: 4442: 4401: 4369: 4340: 4332: 4322: 4301: 4293: 4200: 4161: 4127: 4097: 4093: 4066: 4040: 4009: 4005: 3993: 3970: 3940: 3926: 3830: 3812: 3798: 3766: 3751: 3725: 3700: 3679: 3661: 3647: 3615: 3611: 3593: 3576: 3562: 3558: 3530: 3503: 3499: 3488: 3473: 3469: 3451: 3437: 3433: 3422: 3395: 3391: 3363: 3359: 3291: 3274: 3225: 3211: 3207: 3196: 3151: 3147: 3137: 3122: 3118: 3108: 3090: 3066: 3037: 3033: 3022: 2999: 2995: 2984: 2960: 2941: 2926: 2922: 2908: 2884: 2880: 2869: 2845: 2830: 2788: 2774: 2770: 2760: 2740: 2711: 2707: 2697: 2680: 2676: 2665: 2641: 2637: 2626: 2602: 2598: 2579: 2554: 2528: 2509: 2505: 2490: 2475: 2452: 2433: 2429: 2176: 2157: 2146: 2111: 2090: 1812: 1772: 1746: 1720: 1699: 1662: 1652: 1617: 1535: 1488: 1179: 1146: 1113: 1083: 1057: 1043: 1008: 970: 940: 910: 877: 861: 847: 831: 799: 778: 744: 713: 709: 694: 652: 648: 611: 593: 541: 522: 499: 478: 445: 425: 405: 390: 370: 356: 341: 319: 296: 288: 278: 265: 257: 250: 234: 219: 207: 193: 176: 162: 133: 118: 3568:

Fixed. It was an issue relating to whitespace around the conditionals for the additional columns.

1189:

I've been seeing if I can adapt this template to the elections for the UN Security Council, using

226: 199: 168: 147: 125: 103: 5356: 3049: 2671:

To represent what the election is for, but remember, if it is a non-free flag, you can't use it.

1648: 1171: 641:

would allow this, but I wanted to check here first as I'm not too familiar with template syntax.

600: 582: 214: 188: 4073:. With both text and template being squeezed, I'd say some redesign and/or collapsing is needed. 5555: 5511: 5447: 4868: 4648: 4643: 4609: 3826: 3794: 3675: 3643: 2937: 2826: 2730: 2622: 2384: 2262: 2257: 2123: 2086: 1527: 1480: 1105: 962: 902: 857: 795: 623: 533: 401: 366: 352: 230: 203: 172: 157: 129: 113: 1567:

The party candidate must be listed on the ballot in enough states to win 270 electoral votes.

1033:

Generally speaking, I just think we shouldn't put "losers" in bold. No electoral vote --: -->

5372: 4979:. Election-specific circumstances should decide which one to use on a case-by-case basis. -- 4154: 4033: 4022: 3933: 3805: 3759: 3718: 3693: 3654: 3586: 3569: 3283: 3266: 2784: 2756: 2693: 2661: 2520: 2482: 2481:

Solved the second issue. I still can't figure out why the party colours aren't displaying.

2467: 1607: 1136: 998: 930: 821: 734: 684: 315: 4822:

as the incumbent may aid the reader to understand why their "seats needed" figure is "0".

5980: 5897: 5671: 5550:

is similar, in that it removes the "Elected" from the post-title. I've played around with

4804: 3484: 3447: 3418: 2861: 2841: 2154: 2143: 1742: 1714: 1259: 508: 485: 431: 411: 376: 327: 4637: 3886:

So I have used the sandbox to demonstrate a way of doing it, by adding a new data field,

2122:

Does anyone know if there's any way that this template could support the inclusion of an

1627:

I can't see in the template code how this is caused but in the infobox as displaying on

6130: 6096: 6021: 5936: 5878: 5843: 5807: 5768: 5697: 5683: 5639: 5564: 5529: 5488: 5412: 5401: 5288: 5257: 5222: 5204: 5189: 5155: 5102: 5079:

is the most neutral of the terms proposed as it is correct in all cases. If the terms

5011: 4921: 4910: 4883: 4831: 4789: 4764: 4715: 4684: 4621: 4594: 4575: 4477: 4396: 4317: 4243:

a presidential election, so why force people to input an untruth to use this template?

4089: 4001: 3607: 3554: 3527: 3495: 3465: 3429: 3387: 3355: 3203: 3143: 3133: 3114: 3104: 3029: 2991: 2970:

How do I make a parliamentary election show two columns (2x2) rather than three (3x2)?

2956: 2918: 2904: 2876: 2766: 2703: 2672: 2633: 2594: 2544: 2501: 2417: 1659: 705: 644: 326:

PM" might be correct but something about it rings wrong for me. Any other suggestions?

6052:, it says "The Labour Party under Tony Blair won its third consecutive victory" while 5722:

Probably can go beneath the line where it says "All ____ seats of the <chamber: -->

5524:

for the title before election. If the title after the election is different, than use

3413:.) Would it be possible to make it so images can display without displaying a party? - 5915:

was discussed in LDP caucuses, then they sleep in parliamentary deliberations lol). –

5352: 4671:

Well, now being aware of such a wonderous place, I have called out for assistance at

4069:

The information inside the template also tends to be squeezed, e.g. I just looked at

3844:

this arose unintentionally, but it's a perverse situation and a nuisance for users.

3085: 3017: 2980: 2412:

Could someone please fix the colours for UKIP and The Greens in this infobox over at

2052: 2037: 1644: 5089:

or anything else are desired, they can be implemented in individual cases using the

3953:, but that notification is probably superfluous now. I will update the /doc page. -- 2466:

and tell me why the party colours and all the data after the map aren't displaying?

568:

by wrapping the name of each person (candidate/ nominee/ running mate, etc.), thus:

4028:

look; it's a hand-coded table which is styled to match. That said, it shouldn't be

3822: 3790: 3671: 3639: 2933: 2822: 2726: 2618: 2496:

What I do, when I am trying to do something that is on another article, is I go to

2173: 2082: 1287: 853: 791: 397: 362: 348: 274: 246: 5368: 3882:

If the current solution is used, there is no place for a list of constituencies.

2780: 2752: 2689: 2657: 2395: 2320: 2236: 1602: 1131: 993: 925: 816: 729: 679: 565: 430:"Next PM" may not be particularly formal nor florid but I think it is accurate. 311: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

375:

I like this term for new PMs but it's not accurate, is it, for continuing PMs?

225:

There's only 3 people discussing this. And what countries use "first party"? --

5976: 5893: 5667: 4800: 3480: 3443: 3414: 2837: 1738: 3522:

How I can add more results, when there are multiple ballots. I need it here:

2821:

means that we cannot show one of the government parties. Can it be extended?

2168:{{#if:{{{party1|}}}{{{color1|}}}{{{colour1|}}}| 6067:

Seats contested: 650 seats in the House of Commons Majority of seats: 326

5396: 5252: 5184: 5136: 5097: 4905: 4826: 4784: 4759: 4710: 4679: 4616: 4589: 4570: 4472: 4391: 4312: 3129: 3100: 2952: 2900: 1305: 6129:

I don't know, I couldn't think of one, it's too late here for me to think.

4777: 1508:| posttitle = New Members | after_election = {{flag|Uganda}} <small: --> 1048:

Presenting the states carried in bold is maybe not needed but ok with me.--

6071:

This can also be handy in U.S. Electoral College where you do need 270 to

1677:

This article or section contains information about a forthcoming election.

1556:, upon which consensus was reached to adopt in the 2008 election article. 3080: 3012: 2976: 2138:. I tried it out in the sandbox, and I think another line similar to the 256:

Sounds like a good idea, where do you think the section should be put? --

3409:

images or repeating the party name under each image. (See, for example,

6045:

on the election preceding the legislative session won't gang up on you.

4673:

Knowledge (XXG):Help desk#Help with blank lines appearing above infobox

3777:

Some recent changes appear to have introduced an error, the infobox at

1458: 1341: 4032:

large; as you say, this would seem to be an article-specific problem.

2462:

I'm terrible with templates; would anybody be able to take a look at

2056: 2041: 1922: 1440: 1422: 1386: 1323: 2990:

Use candidate numbers 1, 2, 4, & 5, rather than using number 3.

2875:

Either a party or a color needs to be specified for each candidate.

638:{{flagicon |{{{country|}}}| variant={{{flagvariant|}}}| size=50px}} 2439:

Can this template be modified to allow for more then six candidates

1404: 1359: 581:

but am wary of breaking the template. Can someone assist, please?

562: 347:

sources suggest the same term is used in Australia and Ireland. --

662:

Is this infobox appropriate for state election articles such as

4612:

for pointing this out and restoring the last working version.

1673:

Currently, setting "ongoing = yes" turns on a flag that reads:

762:(Further) reverts at articles affected by this should add "per 2779:

That isn't really and argument about why the flags are useful

1130:

I agree. Only leave the electoral vote of the winner in bold.

992:

11 states or lose while winning as many as 40 (including DC).

25: 5174:

Talk:Australian federal election, 2010#flag at top of infobox

1797:

Democratic Party (United States) presidential primaries, 2008

1680:

Content may change dramatically as the election approaches.

4153:

only two parties on each row, or an even broader rethink.

3216:

Right, but I am afraid that does not address the problem.

1587:

page to see if there is consensus to remove the candidate.

4604:

Just when I thought that I had my head around templates,

3630:

Could someone familiar with this template take a look at

1658:

Use the "ongoing = yes" parameter on the article page. --

672:

United States presidential election in Pennsylvania, 2004

3945:

Thanks, Chris, that was very quick. I had just notified

2817:

no less than 11 parties are defending parliament seats.

2539:

I was wondering why the template wasn't rendering right

1194:

I've commented out the annoying bits on the main page.

5658: 5218: 5200: 4744: 4739: 4605: 3903: 3899: 3631: 3243: 2540: 3257:, and the other is a non-partisan candidate backed by 1753:

Adding a separate "Alliance" parameter for each leader

924:

inconsistency, as that has only happened three times.

4632:

Ay, but if we're going to be giving credit, kudos to

3375:

This can occur in the United States as it did in the

2585:

A link can be placed in the seats_for_election, like

664:

United States presidential election in Missouri, 2008

5654:

Display of seats_for_election and opinion polls link

5638:

Why can't you just change the type to presidential?

676:

United States presidential election in Florida, 2004

668:

United States presidential election in Indiana, 2008

5442:Specifically, the code in the present template is: 3626:

Display problem when only some candidates are known

3322:anywhere in the template, then replace party1 with 3042:If you don't like the way Knowledge (XXG) looks on 3011:that wikipedia works/can be viewed on all mediums. 1867: 1241: 5444:{{#ifexist:{{{next_election|}}}|]|{{{next_year}}}} 5411:I agree, at least have them for future elections. 5117: 852:Only the Electoral Vote winner, shoul be in bold. 5554:, but it always leaves a "before election" tag.-- 5311:"Last election" seats should be AFTER "Seats won" 4855:the election. The same applies to the infobox at 3411:Conservative Party (UK) leadership election, 2005 700:Speaker of the House of Commons/other Legislature 5177: 4155:Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) 3877:List of United Kingdom Parliament constituencies 3234:Several parties backing a presidential candidate 2371: 2028: 1271: 1185:When and why does the "To be determined" pop up? 4949:-elect." For example, use "Re-elected Senator" 3804:Fixed. Any other problems, please let me know. 3178:, the layout of "‹ 2010 · members <Flag: --> 2717:icon usage out there. Also, per my comments at 2535:"Minor candidates" section breaks the template? 2126:to be used on certain articles in place of the 6120:ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens. 6086:ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens. 6056:refuses to say outright the Conservatives won 5961:ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens. 5926:ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens. 5868:ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens. 5832:ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens. 5796:ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens. 5749:ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens. 4499:ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens. 4438:ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens. 4365:ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens. 3536:Extra spacing when there is only one candidate 1198:United Nations Security Council election, 2008 1191:United Nations Security Council election, 2008 756:Talk:United States presidential election, 2008 6048:As further testament to this, on the lead of 4736:Talk:Australian federal election, 2010#-elect 8: 5287:looked odd before, and it didn't get moved. 4957:. Additionally, just "Elected <title: --> 3354:Any combination of the above with alliance. 2725:are removed, something is lost, I think. — 2186: 1823: 1197: 5714:For those bad in math: Seats needed to win 3742:I prefer that the old inbox be put backed. 2809:Why only 6 parties allowed in the template? 3947:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom 3304:Change party1 to CDU/CSU (like 2009), add 2185: 1822: 1196: 4751:there is causing confusion or ambiguity. 3789:appearing above the 2nd and 3rd entries. 2132:United States presidential election, 2008 1793:United States presidential election, 2008 1779:my changes and leave me a message on my ( 5763:, which displays the seats needed for a 4962:, in which incumbent Rell won election ( 4539: 632:{{flagicon |{{{country|}}}| size=50px}} 144:Northern Ireland Assembly election, 2007 5469:situations from resulting from them. -- 5146:If we are to retain the flag icon (see 4960:2006 Connecticut gubernatorial election 4541: 3281:Talk:German_presidential_election,_2010 1629:British Columbia general election, 2009 1544:United States party nominees in infobox 5731:All 650 seats in the House of Commons. 4534: 4018:Well, it really only approximates the 3890:(name chosen to match existing fields 3785:style="text-align: center; width: 20%" 3046:you'll have to take it up with Apple. 1711:Icelandic parliamentary election, 2009 1264:Security Council after 2008 elections. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 6054:United Kingdom general election, 2010 6050:United Kingdom general election, 2005 5725:United Kingdom general election, 2010 5390:Template:Infobox election/testcases#8 4071:United Kingdom general election, 1987 4055:United Kingdom general election, 1992 3951:WikiProject Elections and Referendums 3857:United Kingdom general election, 2010 3636:Michigan gubernatorial election, 2010 3176:United Kingdom general election, 2010 3174:Looking at the top of the infobox at 2972:Croatian parliamentary election, 2011 2591:United Kingdom general election, 2005 1824:Indonesian legislative election, 2004 1789:United Kingdom general election, 2005 1243:5 (of 10) non-permanent seats on the 7: 5610:leaders. Thanking you in advance. 3979:Template too wide to sit beside text 810:I'm re-posting my comment here from 5877:There is a line for voter turnout. 5605:Nominees in Parliamentary elections 4703:Template:Infobox election/testcases 4701:seems well. I also noted that the 3839:List of MPs elected in the election 3428:Sure, enter in the colour instead. 3336:anywhere in the template, then add 2856:Why is it that the infobox for the 2376:Member of Parliment before election 1885: 5330:Last election 83 seats 65 seats 3779:New Zealand general election, 2011 3524:German presidential election, 1949 3240:German presidential election, 2010 24: 5328:Leader's seat Lalor Warringah 5317:Australian federal election, 2010 4900:How about "Elected <title: --> 4857:Australian federal election, 2010 4246:Examples for the abovementioned: 3310:alliance2=Alliance '90/The Greens 5135: 3909:Please can we implement this? -- 3859:currently has that field set to 3848: 2891:Final composition of the chamber 2858:2000 Republican primary election 2748:non-trivial identification value 1830: 1452: 1434: 1416: 1398: 1380: 1353: 1335: 1317: 1299: 1281: 1258: 1204: 573:<span class="db-dmNhcmQ": --> 552: 29: 5781:No, that's what's "seats_needed 5761:Canadian federal election, 2011 5459:2012 U.S. presidential election 5388:"Seats won"/"Seat change": see 4849:Canadian federal election, 2008 4423:"first party" in parliamentary. 3540:In some elections, such as the 3238:I want to use this template at 2587:Canadian federal election, 2008 2414:Norwich North by-election, 2009 2182:Norwich North by-election, 2009 1877:Regional Representative Council 1871:People's Representative Council 1520:{{flag|Austria}} <small: --> 1245:United Nations Security Council 629:I think that changing the line 124:Seems pretty obvious to me... - 5664:41st Canadian federal election 5542:I was thinking something like 5497:02:01, 14 September 2010 (UTC) 5479:17:18, 13 September 2010 (UTC) 5451:16:20, 13 September 2010 (UTC) 5361:19:21, 10 September 2010 (UTC) 5341:Leader's seat Lalor Warringah 4034:Chris Cunningham (not at work) 3934:Chris Cunningham (not at work) 3847:This was discussed above (see 3806:Chris Cunningham (not at work) 3760:Chris Cunningham (not at work) 3719:Chris Cunningham (not at work) 3694:Chris Cunningham (not at work) 3655:Chris Cunningham (not at work) 3587:Chris Cunningham (not at work) 3570:Chris Cunningham (not at work) 3458:party1=Conservative Party (UK) 2517:Alberta general election, 2008 2464:Alberta general election, 1905 2434:23:14, 13 September 2009 (UTC) 1517:{{flag|Turkey}} <small: --> 1514:{{flag|Mexico}} <small: --> 194:09:36, 30 September 2008 (UTC) 177:20:18, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 163:15:51, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 134:21:54, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 18:Template talk:Infobox election 1: 5692:03:59, 28 February 2011 (UTC) 5676:03:49, 28 February 2011 (UTC) 5421:23:24, 23 November 2010 (UTC) 5407:23:02, 23 November 2010 (UTC) 5379:14:52, 19 November 2010 (UTC) 5195:08:15, 4 September 2010 (UTC) 5164:04:23, 4 September 2010 (UTC) 4876:17:02, 9 September 2010 (UTC) 4837:14:44, 9 September 2010 (UTC) 4809:12:00, 9 September 2010 (UTC) 4795:15:15, 1 September 2010 (UTC) 4771:14:51, 1 September 2010 (UTC) 4636:for pointing this out at the 4504:10:12, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 4483:10:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 4443:09:46, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 4402:09:18, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 4370:07:51, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 4341:05:09, 2 September 2010 (UTC) 4323:03:41, 2 September 2010 (UTC) 2831:16:50, 21 February 2010 (UTC) 2789:14:12, 14 February 2010 (UTC) 2775:04:01, 13 February 2010 (UTC) 2761:12:08, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 2741:01:08, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 2712:00:58, 11 February 2010 (UTC) 2698:10:06, 10 February 2010 (UTC) 2681:04:31, 10 February 2010 (UTC) 2642:04:36, 10 February 2010 (UTC) 2627:23:32, 19 December 2009 (UTC) 2580:17:56, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 2555:22:39, 28 November 2009 (UTC) 2515:I actually tried that, using 2158:19:53, 27 December 2009 (UTC) 1785:Indian general election, 2009 1536:01:50, 26 February 2009 (UTC) 1511:{{flag|Japan}} <small: --> 1489:22:34, 24 February 2009 (UTC) 1147:12:35, 18 February 2009 (UTC) 1114:07:29, 18 February 2009 (UTC) 1084:01:23, 17 February 2009 (UTC) 1058:01:14, 17 February 2009 (UTC) 1044:01:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC) 1009:00:17, 17 February 2009 (UTC) 971:23:24, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 941:23:14, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 911:23:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 878:01:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 862:23:23, 15 February 2009 (UTC) 848:15:35, 15 February 2009 (UTC) 832:14:40, 15 February 2009 (UTC) 714:18:29, 21 December 2008 (UTC) 695:01:56, 15 November 2008 (UTC) 612:15:15, 13 December 2008 (UTC) 523:18:16, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 500:18:16, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 479:08:48, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 6016:look? I named the parameter 5648:23:35, 7 February 2011 (UTC) 5631:22:31, 7 February 2011 (UTC) 5597:17:16, 14 January 2011 (UTC) 5573:10:08, 14 January 2011 (UTC) 5559:06:47, 14 January 2011 (UTC) 5538:00:32, 14 January 2011 (UTC) 5515:23:34, 13 January 2011 (UTC) 5297:13:30, 14 October 2010 (UTC) 5283:I'm not sure, in my opinion 5263:07:37, 14 October 2010 (UTC) 5231:04:08, 14 October 2010 (UTC) 5178:#Placement of the flag/years 5109:05:00, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 5054:14:45, 25 October 2010 (UTC) 5020:14:05, 25 October 2010 (UTC) 4989:07:01, 25 October 2010 (UTC) 4953:, but use "President-elect" 4930:03:00, 24 October 2010 (UTC) 4916:14:33, 23 October 2010 (UTC) 4892:06:50, 22 October 2010 (UTC) 4606:the version that I worked on 4551: 3152:05:10, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 3138:03:55, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 2815:Dutch general election, 2010 2666:11:03, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 2529:15:37, 29 October 2009 (UTC) 2510:06:44, 29 October 2009 (UTC) 2491:06:15, 29 October 2009 (UTC) 2476:06:00, 29 October 2009 (UTC) 2453:08:43, 3 November 2009 (UTC) 1669:Ongoing, but not forthcoming 1180:15:25, 9 December 2009 (UTC) 1076:The Magnificent Clean-keeper 1050:The Magnificent Clean-keeper 1036:The Magnificent Clean-keeper 840:The Magnificent Clean-keeper 806:Popular vote winner in bold? 771:The Magnificent Clean-keeper 745:00:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 719:Popular vote winner in bold? 653:23:39, 3 November 2008 (UTC) 594:19:55, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 574:<span class="db-Zm4": --> 542:03:19, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 446:02:30, 16 October 2008 (UTC) 426:02:28, 16 October 2008 (UTC) 406:22:26, 15 October 2008 (UTC) 391:20:44, 15 October 2008 (UTC) 371:17:55, 15 October 2008 (UTC) 357:17:50, 15 October 2008 (UTC) 342:14:10, 15 October 2008 (UTC) 5213:07:06, 7 October 2010 (UTC) 5133: 4721:12:47, 31 August 2010 (UTC) 4690:13:23, 30 August 2010 (UTC) 4663:02:51, 30 August 2010 (UTC) 4627:02:08, 30 August 2010 (UTC) 4600:14:24, 29 August 2010 (UTC) 4581:12:48, 29 August 2010 (UTC) 4556: 4522:Placement of the flag/years 2391:Elected Member of Parliment 2177:00:39, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 2172:This is pretty broken... — 1623:"First Party, Second Party" 754:Copy/paste discussion from 235:20:07, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 220:20:02, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 208:23:02, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 6161: 5431:Red link for next election 5120: 5081:"Re-elected <title: --> 4548: 4302:07:00, 9 August 2010 (UTC) 3344:, and replace party1 with 3179:Next ›" is, shall we say, 3000:14:08, 21 April 2010 (UTC) 2985:11:23, 21 April 2010 (UTC) 2961:11:53, 10 April 2010 (UTC) 2885:07:00, 28 March 2010 (UTC) 2870:03:31, 28 March 2010 (UTC) 2846:14:36, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 1726:The answer was to use the 1721:15:21, 26 April 2009 (UTC) 1700:01:23, 21 April 2009 (UTC) 1663:05:41, 18 April 2009 (UTC) 1653:12:38, 11 April 2009 (UTC) 1550:2008 presidential election 550: 6139:06:51, 6 April 2011 (UTC) 6125:06:44, 6 April 2011 (UTC) 6105:06:39, 6 April 2011 (UTC) 6091:06:31, 6 April 2011 (UTC) 6030:00:38, 6 April 2011 (UTC) 5985:17:29, 5 April 2011 (UTC) 5966:03:34, 5 April 2011 (UTC) 5945:03:31, 5 April 2011 (UTC) 5931:03:26, 5 April 2011 (UTC) 5902:20:25, 4 April 2011 (UTC) 5887:17:43, 4 April 2011 (UTC) 5873:06:48, 4 April 2011 (UTC) 5852:06:10, 4 April 2011 (UTC) 5837:05:40, 4 April 2011 (UTC) 5816:04:59, 4 April 2011 (UTC) 5801:04:06, 4 April 2011 (UTC) 5777:23:14, 3 April 2011 (UTC) 5754:18:57, 3 April 2011 (UTC) 5706:04:00, 5 March 2011 (UTC) 5439:, it ought to be linked. 5147: 4968:Re-elected <title: --> 4201:18:33, 24 July 2010 (UTC) 4162:15:54, 23 July 2010 (UTC) 4128:01:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC) 4098:00:18, 20 July 2010 (UTC) 4067:23:43, 19 July 2010 (UTC) 4041:08:05, 19 July 2010 (UTC) 4010:03:11, 19 July 2010 (UTC) 3994:00:30, 19 July 2010 (UTC) 3971:12:47, 13 July 2010 (UTC) 3941:12:41, 13 July 2010 (UTC) 3927:06:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC) 3869:... the plain reading of 3855:The link is obscure. The 3831:12:38, 13 July 2010 (UTC) 3813:12:33, 13 July 2010 (UTC) 3799:00:14, 11 July 2010 (UTC) 3563:03:20, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3531:15:15, 12 June 2010 (UTC) 3504:06:30, 19 June 2010 (UTC) 3489:02:53, 19 June 2010 (UTC) 3396:03:13, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 2942:23:35, 4 April 2010 (UTC) 2927:22:56, 4 April 2010 (UTC) 2909:14:01, 4 April 2010 (UTC) 2369: 2300: 2218: 2191: 2187:Norwich North by-election 2147:19:32, 22 June 2009 (UTC) 2112:02:08, 11 June 2009 (UTC) 2026: 1882: 1840: 1828: 1618:16:53, 5 April 2009 (UTC) 1269: 1256: 1250: 1214: 1202: 812:Template:Infobox Election 764:Template:Infobox Election 547:Adding hCard microformats 320:20:47, 24 July 2008 (UTC) 297:21:32, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 279:13:30, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 266:07:47, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 251:22:50, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 119:15:28, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 5437:Knowledge (XXG):Red link 5172:There was discontent at 3767:19:49, 6 July 2010 (UTC) 3752:15:32, 6 July 2010 (UTC) 3726:14:46, 6 July 2010 (UTC) 3701:13:50, 6 July 2010 (UTC) 3680:13:37, 6 July 2010 (UTC) 3662:13:19, 6 July 2010 (UTC) 3648:11:47, 6 July 2010 (UTC) 3616:08:14, 9 July 2010 (UTC) 3594:09:14, 8 July 2010 (UTC) 3577:08:46, 8 July 2010 (UTC) 3474:23:30, 8 June 2010 (UTC) 3452:19:34, 8 June 2010 (UTC) 3438:22:31, 5 June 2010 (UTC) 3423:20:15, 5 June 2010 (UTC) 3364:00:53, 4 June 2010 (UTC) 3292:23:29, 3 June 2010 (UTC) 3275:22:37, 3 June 2010 (UTC) 3226:00:01, 14 May 2010 (UTC) 3212:23:26, 13 May 2010 (UTC) 3197:21:51, 13 May 2010 (UTC) 3123:23:35, 11 May 2010 (UTC) 3109:15:06, 11 May 2010 (UTC) 2860:doesn't have pictures?-- 2603:23:30, 13 May 2010 (UTC) 2091:06:08, 9 June 2009 (UTC) 1813:16:53, 25 May 2009 (UTC) 1773:07:17, 22 May 2009 (UTC) 658:State election articles? 5076:"Elected <title: --> 4219:A misleading parameter? 3091:03:19, 3 May 2010 (UTC) 3067:17:40, 2 May 2010 (UTC) 3038:01:49, 2 May 2010 (UTC) 3023:00:39, 2 May 2010 (UTC) 2033:Speaker before election 1783:. Pages verified are - 1747:09:42, 2 May 2009 (UTC) 1502:{{BEL}} <small: --> 1276:Members before election 800:14:32, 1 May 2009 (UTC) 790:the Electoral winners. 779:04:03, 1 May 2009 (UTC) 5334:Seat change ▼11 ▲7 5129:Elections in Australia 4977:Elected <title: --> 4778:has been raised before 2852:Problem: 2000 election 1505:{{ITA}} <small: --> 1496:{{IDN}} <small: --> 603:(User:Pigsonthewing); 585:(User:Pigsonthewing); 5347:Last election 83 65 5124:Politics of Australia 4053:I saw the example in 3170:Previous mps/next mps 2500:to see how its done. 2081:Thanks for the help! 1875:all 128 seats of the 1869:All 550 seats of the 1819:Bold on winning party 1737:longish infoboxes). - 1499:{{PAN}}<small: --> 98:Government/Opposition 42:of past discussions. 2096:Maintenance template 2071:Indonesian elections 561:I would like to add 5723:." For example, in 5345:Seat change ▼11 ▲7 5332:Seats won 72 72 5071:"Winning candidate" 3781:has some code text 2188: 1825: 1199: 760:here to centralize. 5734:Needed to win: 326 4740:an earlier version 3744:Rizalninoynapoleon 2899:. Any objections? 2568:Aditya.krishnan.82 2498:that other article 1945:153 seats, 33.74% 1942:120 seats, 22.44% 1801:Aditya.krishnan.82 1761:Aditya.krishnan.82 1639:to be changed and 1521:(])</small: --> 1518:(])</small: --> 1515:(])</small: --> 1512:(])</small: --> 1509:(])</small: --> 1506:(])</small: --> 1503:(])</small: --> 1500:(])</small: --> 1497:(])</small: --> 1494:(])</small: --> 5634: 5617:comment added by 5405: 5325:E.g., currently: 5261: 5193: 5144: 5143: 5131: 5106: 4914: 4835: 4793: 4768: 4719: 4688: 4661: 4625: 4598: 4579: 4561: 4560: 4536:Previous election 4481: 4400: 4321: 4284:Pennsylvania 2010 4264:Pennsylvania 2010 3969: 3925: 3044:the iPhone/iTouch 2686:WP:ICONDECORATION 2410: 2409: 2406: 2405: 2365: 2364: 2263:Liberal Democrats 2214: 2213: 2067: 2066: 2063: 2062: 2022: 2021: 1948:51 seats, 12.61% 1863: 1862: 1477: 1476: 1473: 1472: 1467: 1449: 1431: 1413: 1395: 1368: 1350: 1332: 1314: 1296: 1252: 1237: 1236: 781: 624:Template:Flagicon 469:comment added by 95: 94: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 6152: 6121: 6114: 6087: 6080: 6019: 5962: 5955: 5927: 5920: 5869: 5862: 5833: 5826: 5797: 5790: 5750: 5743: 5633: 5611: 5553: 5549: 5545: 5527: 5523: 5445: 5393: 5343:Seats won 72 72 5249: 5181: 5140: 5139: 5121: 5118: 5114:Additional links 5108:-elect_TBD": --> 5094: 4902: 4875:-elect_TBD": --> 4873: 4871: 4866: 4823: 4781: 4776:I see that this 4770:-elect_TBD": --> 4756: 4707: 4676: 4654: 4651: 4613: 4586: 4567: 4532: 4531: 4500: 4493: 4469: 4439: 4432: 4388: 4366: 4359: 4309: 4274:Connecticut 2010 4270:U.S. Senatorial 4254:Connecticut 2010 4027: 4021: 3960: 3957: 3916: 3913: 3897: 3893: 3889: 3866:House of Commons 3849:Current MPs list 3773:Error introduced 3518:multiple ballots 3463: 3459: 3351: 3348:and party2 with 3347: 3343: 3339: 3335: 3329: 3326:and party2 with 3325: 3321: 3317: 3311: 3307: 3065: 3056: 3052: 2951:field. Regards. 2950: 2916: 2813:In the upcoming 2560:Current MPs list 2551: 2550: 2426: 2423: 2372: 2241:Chris Ostrowski 2220: 2219: 2193: 2192: 2189: 2029: 1884: 1883: 1842: 1841: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1826: 1735: 1729: 1615: 1610: 1605: 1461: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1443: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1425: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1407: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1389: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1362: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1344: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1326: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1308: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1290: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1272: 1262: 1251: 1216: 1215: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1200: 1144: 1139: 1134: 1006: 1001: 996: 938: 933: 928: 829: 824: 819: 768: 742: 737: 732: 692: 687: 682: 577: 556: 555: 516: 513: 493: 490: 481: 439: 436: 419: 416: 384: 381: 335: 332: 217: 191: 160: 155: 150: 116: 111: 106: 73: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 6160: 6159: 6155: 6154: 6153: 6151: 6150: 6149: 6119: 6112: 6085: 6078: 6068: 6017: 5960: 5953: 5925: 5918: 5867: 5860: 5831: 5824: 5795: 5788: 5748: 5741: 5720: 5656: 5612: 5607: 5589:Pictureprovince 5585: 5551: 5547: 5543: 5525: 5521: 5507: 5443: 5433: 5313: 5134: 5116: 5086:"<title: --> 5069:I suspect that 4869: 4862: 4860: 4732: 4649: 4524: 4498: 4491: 4437: 4430: 4364: 4357: 4221: 4025: 4019: 3981: 3955: 3911: 3895: 3891: 3887: 3841: 3775: 3740: 3738:The New Infobox 3628: 3538: 3520: 3461: 3457: 3456:I mean replace 3406: 3349: 3345: 3341: 3337: 3333: 3327: 3323: 3319: 3316:party_colour=no 3315: 3309: 3305: 3236: 3172: 3054: 3048: 3047: 3008: 2968: 2948: 2914: 2893: 2854: 2811: 2650: 2611: 2562: 2548: 2546: 2537: 2460: 2441: 2431: 2424: 2421: 2184: 2170: 2166: 2120: 2098: 2079: 2048:Elected Speaker 1831: 1829: 1821: 1755: 1733: 1727: 1707: 1692:Ordinary Person 1671: 1625: 1613: 1608: 1603: 1546: 1523: 1453: 1451: 1435: 1433: 1417: 1415: 1399: 1397: 1381: 1379: 1354: 1352: 1336: 1334: 1318: 1316: 1300: 1298: 1282: 1280: 1265: 1226:17 October 2008 1205: 1203: 1187: 1168: 1162: 1142: 1137: 1132: 1004: 999: 994: 936: 931: 926: 870:A new name 2008 827: 822: 817: 808: 740: 735: 730: 721: 702: 690: 685: 680: 660: 639: 633: 620: 572: 559: 558: 553: 549: 530: 528:More parameters 514: 509: 491: 486: 464: 437: 432: 417: 412: 382: 377: 333: 328: 307: 242: 215: 189: 158: 153: 148: 114: 109: 104: 100: 69: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 6158: 6156: 6148: 6147: 6146: 6145: 6144: 6143: 6142: 6141: 6066: 6065: 6064: 6061: 6046: 6018:majority_seats 6010: 6009: 6008: 6007: 6006: 6005: 6004: 6003: 6002: 6001: 6000: 5999: 5998: 5997: 5996: 5995: 5994: 5993: 5992: 5991: 5990: 5989: 5988: 5987: 5912: 5736: 5735: 5732: 5719: 5712: 5711: 5710: 5709: 5708: 5655: 5652: 5651: 5650: 5606: 5603: 5601: 5584: 5581: 5580: 5579: 5578: 5577: 5576: 5575: 5506: 5503: 5502: 5501: 5500: 5499: 5482: 5481: 5471:Sgt. R.K. Blue 5432: 5429: 5428: 5427: 5426: 5425: 5424: 5423: 5382: 5381: 5350: 5346: 5344: 5342: 5340: 5339: 5337: 5333: 5331: 5329: 5312: 5309: 5308: 5307: 5306: 5305: 5304: 5303: 5302: 5301: 5300: 5299: 5272: 5271: 5270: 5269: 5268: 5267: 5266: 5265: 5238: 5237: 5236: 5235: 5234: 5233: 5215: 5167: 5166: 5142: 5141: 5132: 5127: 5115: 5112: 5067: 5066: 5065: 5064: 5063: 5062: 5061: 5060: 5059: 5058: 5057: 5056: 5046:Sgt. R.K. Blue 5031: 5030: 5029: 5028: 5027: 5026: 5025: 5024: 5023: 5022: 4998: 4997: 4996: 4995: 4994: 4993: 4992: 4991: 4981:Sgt. R.K. Blue 4972:<title: --> 4937: 4936: 4935: 4934: 4933: 4932: 4895: 4894: 4844: 4843: 4842: 4841: 4840: 4839: 4814: 4813: 4812: 4811: 4731: 4729:<title: --> 4727: 4726: 4725: 4724: 4723: 4695: 4694: 4693: 4692: 4666: 4665: 4634:Magog the Ogre 4563: 4562: 4559: 4558: 4555: 4550: 4546: 4545: 4540: 4538: 4523: 4520: 4519: 4518: 4517: 4516: 4515: 4514: 4513: 4512: 4511: 4510: 4509: 4508: 4507: 4506: 4454: 4453: 4452: 4451: 4450: 4449: 4448: 4447: 4446: 4445: 4424: 4411: 4410: 4409: 4408: 4407: 4406: 4405: 4404: 4377: 4376: 4375: 4374: 4373: 4372: 4346: 4345: 4344: 4343: 4333:Sgt. R.K. Blue 4326: 4325: 4294:Sgt. R.K. Blue 4289: 4288: 4287: 4286: 4281: 4276: 4268: 4267: 4266: 4261: 4256: 4250:Gubernatorial 4220: 4217: 4216: 4215: 4214: 4213: 4212: 4211: 4210: 4209: 4208: 4207: 4206: 4205: 4204: 4203: 4193:212.84.106.112 4175: 4174: 4173: 4172: 4171: 4170: 4169: 4168: 4167: 4166: 4165: 4164: 4139: 4138: 4137: 4136: 4135: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4130: 4120:212.84.100.119 4107: 4106: 4105: 4104: 4103: 4102: 4101: 4100: 4079: 4078: 4077: 4076: 4075: 4074: 4059:212.84.100.119 4046: 4045: 4044: 4043: 4013: 4012: 3986:212.84.100.119 3980: 3977: 3976: 3975: 3974: 3973: 3884: 3883: 3880: 3840: 3837: 3836: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3816: 3815: 3787: 3786: 3774: 3771: 3770: 3769: 3739: 3736: 3735: 3734: 3733: 3732: 3731: 3730: 3729: 3728: 3708: 3707: 3706: 3705: 3704: 3703: 3685: 3684: 3683: 3682: 3665: 3664: 3627: 3624: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3618: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3580: 3579: 3537: 3534: 3519: 3516: 3515: 3514: 3513: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3507: 3506: 3462:colour1=0087DC 3405: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3386:Any ideas? — 3384: 3380: 3373: 3367: 3366: 3352: 3346:party1=], ], ] 3342:colour2=CC0000 3338:colour1=000000 3330: 3324:party1=], ], ] 3312: 3301: 3300: 3235: 3232: 3231: 3230: 3229: 3228: 3171: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3161: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3154: 3040: 3007: 3004: 3003: 3002: 2967: 2964: 2945: 2944: 2929: 2892: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2853: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2810: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2649: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2610: 2607: 2606: 2605: 2566: 2561: 2558: 2536: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2494: 2493: 2459: 2456: 2440: 2437: 2430: 2408: 2407: 2404: 2403: 2398: 2393: 2388: 2383: 2378: 2370: 2367: 2366: 2363: 2362: 2359: 2356: 2352: 2351: 2348: 2345: 2341: 2340: 2335: 2330: 2326: 2325: 2323: 2318: 2315: 2311: 2310: 2308: 2306: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2298: 2297: 2294: 2291: 2286: 2282: 2281: 2278: 2275: 2270: 2266: 2265: 2260: 2255: 2250: 2246: 2245: 2242: 2239: 2234: 2230: 2229: 2227: 2225: 2223: 2216: 2215: 2212: 2211: 2205: 2200: 2183: 2180: 2167: 2165: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2119: 2116: 2097: 2094: 2075: 2065: 2064: 2061: 2060: 2055: 2050: 2045: 2040: 2035: 2027: 2024: 2023: 2020: 2019: 2016: 2013: 2010: 2006: 2005: 2002: 1999: 1996: 1992: 1991: 1988: 1985: 1982: 1978: 1977: 1974: 1971: 1968: 1964: 1963: 1960: 1957: 1954: 1950: 1949: 1946: 1943: 1940: 1939:Last election 1936: 1935: 1930: 1925: 1920: 1916: 1915: 1910: 1905: 1900: 1897: 1896: 1893: 1890: 1887: 1880: 1879: 1874: 1868: 1865: 1864: 1861: 1860: 1854: 1849: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1820: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1799: 1759: 1754: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1706: 1703: 1670: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1624: 1621: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1562: 1561: 1545: 1542: 1540: 1492: 1475: 1474: 1471: 1470: 1468: 1450: 1432: 1414: 1396: 1377: 1372: 1370: 1369: 1351: 1333: 1315: 1297: 1278: 1270: 1267: 1266: 1263: 1257: 1254: 1253: 1248: 1247: 1242: 1239: 1238: 1235: 1234: 1228: 1223: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1186: 1183: 1166: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1150: 1149: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1101: 1087: 1086: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1046: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 980: 979: 978: 977: 976: 975: 974: 973: 948: 947: 946: 945: 944: 943: 916: 915: 914: 913: 898: 895: 881: 880: 866: 865: 864: 807: 804: 803: 802: 783: 782: 749: 720: 717: 701: 698: 659: 656: 637: 631: 619: 616: 615: 614: 579: 578: 576:</span: --> 575:</span: --> 551: 548: 545: 529: 526: 505: 504: 503: 502: 460: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 452: 451: 450: 449: 448: 306: 303: 302: 301: 300: 299: 289:Philip Stevens 282: 281: 269: 268: 258:Philip Stevens 241: 238: 223: 222: 184: 183: 182: 181: 180: 179: 137: 136: 99: 96: 93: 92: 87: 84: 79: 74: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 6157: 6140: 6136: 6132: 6128: 6127: 6126: 6122: 6116: 6115: 6108: 6107: 6106: 6102: 6098: 6094: 6093: 6092: 6088: 6082: 6081: 6074: 6070: 6069: 6062: 6059: 6055: 6051: 6047: 6044: 6039: 6034: 6033: 6032: 6031: 6027: 6023: 6015: 5986: 5982: 5978: 5973: 5969: 5968: 5967: 5963: 5957: 5956: 5948: 5947: 5946: 5942: 5938: 5934: 5933: 5932: 5928: 5922: 5921: 5913: 5910: 5905: 5904: 5903: 5899: 5895: 5890: 5889: 5888: 5884: 5880: 5876: 5875: 5874: 5870: 5864: 5863: 5855: 5854: 5853: 5849: 5845: 5840: 5839: 5838: 5834: 5828: 5827: 5819: 5818: 5817: 5813: 5809: 5804: 5803: 5802: 5798: 5792: 5791: 5784: 5780: 5779: 5778: 5774: 5770: 5766: 5762: 5758: 5757: 5756: 5755: 5751: 5745: 5744: 5733: 5730: 5729: 5728: 5726: 5717: 5713: 5707: 5703: 5699: 5695: 5694: 5693: 5689: 5685: 5680: 5679: 5678: 5677: 5673: 5669: 5665: 5660: 5653: 5649: 5645: 5641: 5637: 5636: 5635: 5632: 5628: 5624: 5620: 5616: 5604: 5602: 5599: 5598: 5594: 5590: 5582: 5574: 5570: 5566: 5562: 5561: 5560: 5557: 5541: 5540: 5539: 5535: 5531: 5519: 5518: 5517: 5516: 5513: 5510:it to work.-- 5504: 5498: 5494: 5490: 5486: 5485: 5484: 5483: 5480: 5476: 5472: 5468: 5464: 5460: 5455: 5454: 5453: 5452: 5449: 5440: 5438: 5430: 5422: 5418: 5414: 5410: 5409: 5408: 5403: 5399: 5398: 5391: 5386: 5385: 5384: 5383: 5380: 5376: 5375: 5370: 5365: 5364: 5363: 5362: 5358: 5354: 5348: 5335: 5326: 5323: 5320: 5318: 5310: 5298: 5294: 5290: 5286: 5282: 5281: 5280: 5279: 5278: 5277: 5276: 5275: 5274: 5273: 5264: 5259: 5255: 5254: 5246: 5245: 5244: 5243: 5242: 5241: 5240: 5239: 5232: 5228: 5224: 5220: 5216: 5214: 5210: 5206: 5202: 5198: 5197: 5196: 5191: 5187: 5186: 5179: 5175: 5171: 5170: 5169: 5168: 5165: 5161: 5157: 5153: 5152: 5151: 5149: 5138: 5130: 5126: 5125: 5119: 5113: 5111: 5110: 5104: 5100: 5099: 5092: 5088: 5083: 5078: 5072: 5055: 5051: 5047: 5043: 5042: 5041: 5040: 5039: 5038: 5037: 5036: 5035: 5034: 5033: 5032: 5021: 5017: 5013: 5008: 5007: 5006: 5005: 5004: 5003: 5002: 5001: 5000: 4999: 4990: 4986: 4982: 4978: 4974: 4969: 4965: 4961: 4956: 4952: 4945: 4944: 4943: 4942: 4941: 4940: 4939: 4938: 4931: 4927: 4923: 4919: 4918: 4917: 4912: 4908: 4907: 4899: 4898: 4897: 4896: 4893: 4889: 4885: 4880: 4879: 4878: 4877: 4872: 4867: 4865: 4858: 4854: 4850: 4838: 4833: 4829: 4828: 4820: 4819: 4818: 4817: 4816: 4815: 4810: 4806: 4802: 4798: 4797: 4796: 4791: 4787: 4786: 4779: 4775: 4774: 4773: 4772: 4766: 4762: 4761: 4752: 4750: 4746: 4741: 4737: 4728: 4722: 4717: 4713: 4712: 4704: 4699: 4698: 4697: 4696: 4691: 4686: 4682: 4681: 4674: 4670: 4669: 4668: 4667: 4664: 4660: 4657: 4653: 4652: 4647: 4646: 4639: 4635: 4631: 4630: 4629: 4628: 4623: 4619: 4618: 4611: 4607: 4602: 4601: 4596: 4592: 4591: 4583: 4582: 4577: 4573: 4572: 4557:To be called 4554: 4547: 4544: 4543:Next election 4537: 4533: 4530: 4529: 4528: 4521: 4505: 4501: 4495: 4494: 4486: 4485: 4484: 4479: 4475: 4474: 4466: 4465: 4464: 4463: 4462: 4461: 4460: 4459: 4458: 4457: 4456: 4455: 4444: 4440: 4434: 4433: 4425: 4421: 4420: 4419: 4418: 4417: 4416: 4415: 4414: 4413: 4412: 4403: 4398: 4394: 4393: 4385: 4384: 4383: 4382: 4381: 4380: 4379: 4378: 4371: 4367: 4361: 4360: 4352: 4351: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4347: 4342: 4338: 4334: 4330: 4329: 4328: 4327: 4324: 4319: 4315: 4314: 4306: 4305: 4304: 4303: 4299: 4295: 4285: 4282: 4280: 4277: 4275: 4272: 4271: 4269: 4265: 4262: 4260: 4257: 4255: 4252: 4251: 4249: 4248: 4247: 4244: 4242: 4236: 4234: 4230: 4229:parliamentary 4226: 4218: 4202: 4198: 4194: 4189: 4188: 4187: 4186: 4185: 4184: 4183: 4182: 4181: 4180: 4179: 4178: 4177: 4176: 4163: 4160: 4156: 4151: 4150: 4149: 4148: 4147: 4146: 4145: 4144: 4143: 4142: 4141: 4140: 4129: 4125: 4121: 4117: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4111: 4110: 4109: 4108: 4099: 4095: 4091: 4087: 4086: 4085: 4084: 4083: 4082: 4081: 4080: 4072: 4068: 4064: 4060: 4056: 4052: 4051: 4050: 4049: 4048: 4047: 4042: 4039: 4035: 4031: 4024: 4017: 4016: 4015: 4014: 4011: 4007: 4003: 3998: 3997: 3996: 3995: 3991: 3987: 3978: 3972: 3967: 3963: 3959: 3952: 3948: 3944: 3943: 3942: 3939: 3935: 3931: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3923: 3919: 3915: 3907: 3905: 3902:, and output 3901: 3881: 3878: 3874: 3873: 3868: 3867: 3863: 3858: 3854: 3853: 3852: 3850: 3845: 3838: 3832: 3828: 3824: 3820: 3819: 3818: 3817: 3814: 3811: 3807: 3803: 3802: 3801: 3800: 3796: 3792: 3784: 3783: 3782: 3780: 3772: 3768: 3765: 3761: 3756: 3755: 3754: 3753: 3749: 3745: 3737: 3727: 3724: 3720: 3716: 3715: 3714: 3713: 3712: 3711: 3710: 3709: 3702: 3699: 3695: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3687: 3686: 3681: 3677: 3673: 3669: 3668: 3667: 3666: 3663: 3660: 3656: 3652: 3651: 3650: 3649: 3645: 3641: 3637: 3633: 3625: 3617: 3613: 3609: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3595: 3592: 3588: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3578: 3575: 3571: 3567: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3560: 3556: 3551: 3547: 3543: 3535: 3533: 3532: 3529: 3525: 3517: 3505: 3501: 3497: 3492: 3491: 3490: 3486: 3482: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3471: 3467: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3449: 3445: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3435: 3431: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3424: 3420: 3416: 3412: 3403: 3397: 3393: 3389: 3385: 3381: 3378: 3377:1872 election 3374: 3371: 3370: 3369: 3368: 3365: 3361: 3357: 3353: 3334:party_name=no 3331: 3320:party_name=no 3313: 3306:alliance1=FDP 3303: 3302: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3293: 3289: 3285: 3282: 3277: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3264: 3260: 3256: 3252: 3248: 3244: 3241: 3233: 3227: 3223: 3219: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3209: 3205: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3198: 3194: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3177: 3169: 3153: 3149: 3145: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3135: 3131: 3126: 3125: 3124: 3120: 3116: 3112: 3111: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3098: 3094: 3093: 3092: 3089: 3088: 3084: 3083: 3078: 3077: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3068: 3064: 3060: 3055:Pigsonthewing 3051: 3045: 3041: 3039: 3035: 3031: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3021: 3020: 3016: 3015: 3005: 3001: 2997: 2993: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2986: 2982: 2978: 2973: 2965: 2963: 2962: 2958: 2954: 2943: 2939: 2935: 2930: 2928: 2924: 2920: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2890: 2886: 2882: 2878: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2859: 2851: 2847: 2843: 2839: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2828: 2824: 2818: 2816: 2808: 2790: 2786: 2782: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2772: 2768: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2758: 2754: 2749: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2738: 2735: 2732: 2728: 2724: 2720: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2709: 2705: 2701: 2700: 2699: 2695: 2691: 2687: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2663: 2659: 2656:needed here? 2655: 2647: 2643: 2639: 2635: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2624: 2620: 2616: 2608: 2604: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2559: 2557: 2556: 2553: 2552: 2542: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2457: 2455: 2454: 2450: 2446: 2438: 2436: 2435: 2432: 2428: 2427: 2418: 2415: 2402: 2401: 2397: 2392: 2389: 2387: 2386: 2382: 2377: 2374: 2373: 2368: 2360: 2357: 2354: 2353: 2349: 2346: 2344:Popular vote 2343: 2342: 2339: 2336: 2334: 2331: 2328: 2327: 2324: 2322: 2319: 2317:Glenn Tingle 2316: 2313: 2312: 2309: 2307: 2305: 2304: 2299: 2295: 2292: 2290: 2287: 2284: 2283: 2279: 2276: 2274: 2271: 2269:Popular vote 2268: 2267: 2264: 2261: 2259: 2256: 2254: 2251: 2248: 2247: 2243: 2240: 2238: 2235: 2232: 2231: 2228: 2226: 2224: 2222: 2221: 2217: 2209: 2206: 2204: 2201: 2199: 2195: 2194: 2190: 2181: 2179: 2178: 2175: 2163: 2159: 2156: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2145: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2117: 2115: 2113: 2109: 2108: 2105: 2095: 2093: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2074: 2072: 2059: 2058: 2054: 2053:Agung Laksono 2049: 2046: 2044: 2043: 2039: 2038:Akbar Tanjung 2034: 2031: 2030: 2025: 2017: 2014: 2011: 2008: 2007: 2003: 2000: 1997: 1994: 1993: 1989: 1986: 1983: 1981:Popular vote 1980: 1979: 1975: 1972: 1969: 1966: 1965: 1961: 1958: 1955: 1952: 1951: 1947: 1944: 1941: 1938: 1937: 1934: 1931: 1929: 1926: 1924: 1921: 1918: 1917: 1914: 1911: 1909: 1906: 1904: 1901: 1899: 1898: 1894: 1892:Second party 1891: 1888: 1886: 1881: 1878: 1872: 1866: 1858: 1855: 1853: 1850: 1848: 1844: 1843: 1839: 1827: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1732: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1719: 1716: 1712: 1704: 1702: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1686: 1682: 1681: 1678: 1674: 1668: 1664: 1661: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1622: 1620: 1619: 1616: 1611: 1606: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1555: 1554:this proposal 1551: 1543: 1541: 1538: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1491: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1469: 1465: 1460: 1447: 1442: 1429: 1428:LatAm&Car 1424: 1411: 1406: 1393: 1388: 1376: 1373: 1371: 1366: 1361: 1348: 1343: 1330: 1329:LatAm&Car 1325: 1312: 1307: 1294: 1289: 1277: 1274: 1273: 1268: 1261: 1255: 1249: 1246: 1240: 1232: 1229: 1227: 1224: 1222: 1218: 1217: 1213: 1201: 1195: 1192: 1184: 1182: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1172:Jokes Free4Me 1165: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1148: 1145: 1140: 1135: 1129: 1128: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1102: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1072: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1010: 1007: 1002: 997: 990: 989: 988: 987: 986: 985: 984: 983: 982: 981: 972: 968: 964: 960: 956: 955: 954: 953: 952: 951: 950: 949: 942: 939: 934: 929: 922: 921: 920: 919: 918: 917: 912: 908: 904: 899: 896: 893: 889: 885: 884: 883: 882: 879: 875: 871: 867: 863: 859: 855: 851: 850: 849: 845: 841: 836: 835: 834: 833: 830: 825: 820: 813: 805: 801: 797: 793: 789: 785: 784: 780: 776: 772: 765: 761: 759: 757: 752: 751: 750: 747: 746: 743: 738: 733: 727: 726:2000 election 718: 716: 715: 711: 707: 699: 697: 696: 693: 688: 683: 677: 673: 669: 665: 657: 655: 654: 650: 646: 642: 636: 630: 627: 625: 617: 613: 610: 606: 602: 598: 597: 596: 595: 592: 588: 584: 571: 570: 569: 567: 564: 546: 544: 543: 539: 535: 527: 525: 524: 521: 517: 512: 501: 498: 494: 489: 483: 482: 480: 476: 472: 468: 461: 447: 444: 440: 435: 429: 428: 427: 424: 420: 415: 409: 408: 407: 403: 399: 394: 393: 392: 389: 385: 380: 374: 373: 372: 368: 364: 360: 359: 358: 354: 350: 345: 344: 343: 340: 336: 331: 324: 323: 322: 321: 317: 313: 304: 298: 294: 290: 286: 285: 284: 283: 280: 277: 276: 271: 270: 267: 263: 259: 255: 254: 253: 252: 249: 248: 239: 237: 236: 232: 228: 221: 218: 216:Nightstallion 212: 211: 210: 209: 205: 201: 196: 195: 192: 190:Nightstallion 178: 174: 170: 166: 165: 164: 161: 156: 151: 145: 141: 140: 139: 138: 135: 131: 127: 123: 122: 121: 120: 117: 112: 107: 97: 91: 88: 85: 83: 80: 78: 75: 72: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 6110: 6076: 6072: 6058:the election 6057: 6042: 6037: 6011: 5971: 5951: 5916: 5908: 5858: 5822: 5786: 5782: 5764: 5739: 5737: 5721: 5718:the election 5715: 5657: 5613:— Preceding 5608: 5600: 5586: 5556:Tim Thomason 5512:Tim Thomason 5508: 5441: 5434: 5395: 5373: 5349: 5336: 5327: 5324: 5321: 5314: 5251: 5183: 5145: 5122: 5096: 5090: 5085: 5080: 5075: 5070: 5068: 4976: 4971: 4967: 4963: 4920:Could work. 4904: 4870:MIESIANIACAL 4863: 4852: 4845: 4825: 4783: 4758: 4753: 4748: 4733: 4709: 4678: 4644: 4641: 4615: 4610:SuperHamster 4603: 4588: 4584: 4569: 4564: 4552: 4542: 4535: 4525: 4489: 4471: 4428: 4390: 4355: 4311: 4290: 4279:Florida 2010 4259:Florida 2010 4245: 4240: 4237: 4232: 4228: 4225:presidential 4224: 4222: 4029: 3982: 3908: 3892:previous_mps 3885: 3870: 3860: 3846: 3842: 3788: 3776: 3741: 3629: 3539: 3521: 3407: 3278: 3237: 3218:86.41.61.203 3189:86.41.61.203 3180: 3173: 3086: 3081: 3076:this infobox 3075: 3074: 3063:Andy's edits 3050:Andy Mabbett 3043: 3018: 3013: 3009: 2969: 2946: 2894: 2855: 2819: 2812: 2747: 2733: 2722: 2651: 2614: 2612: 2563: 2545: 2538: 2495: 2461: 2442: 2419: 2411: 2400:Conservative 2394: 2390: 2379: 2375: 2288: 2272: 2253:Conservative 2203:July 23 2009 2202: 2171: 2139: 2127: 2121: 2102: 2099: 2080: 2068: 2051: 2047: 2036: 2032: 1967:Seat change 1895:Third party 1889:First party 1852:5 April 2004 1851: 1756: 1708: 1690: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1676: 1675: 1672: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1626: 1601: 1547: 1539: 1528:Lockesdonkey 1524: 1481:Lockesdonkey 1478: 1378: 1374: 1288:South Africa 1279: 1275: 1225: 1188: 1169: 1163: 1106:Penthamontar 963:Penthamontar 903:Penthamontar 809: 787: 753: 748: 722: 703: 661: 643: 640: 634: 628: 621: 618:Flag variant 609:Andy's edits 601:Andy Mabbett 591:Andy's edits 583:Andy Mabbett 580: 566:microformats 560: 534:Gordon Ecker 531: 510: 506: 487: 433: 413: 378: 329: 308: 273: 245: 243: 224: 197: 185: 101: 70: 43: 37: 5463:this year's 4233:legislative 3888:elected_mps 3350:party2=], ] 3328:party2=], ] 3284:Josh Gorand 3267:Josh Gorand 3097:take a look 3059:Andy's talk 2966:two columns 2652:Why is the 2521:Steve Smith 2483:Steve Smith 2468:Steve Smith 2445:Ukr-Trident 2416:please? -- 2396:Chloe Smith 2355:Percentage 2321:Rupert Read 2285:Percentage 2244:April Pond 2237:Chloe Smith 1995:Percentage 1990:11,989,564 1987:21,026,629 1984:24,480,757 1731:fixbunching 1548:Before the 1519:<br: --> 1516:<br: --> 1513:<br: --> 1510:<br: --> 1507:<br: --> 1504:<br: --> 1501:<br: --> 1498:<br: --> 1495:<br: --> 1375:New Members 605:Andy's talk 587:Andy's talk 471:70.79.59.51 465:—Preceding 36:This is an 5619:Julien-223 5583:Delegates? 5505:"Pretitle" 5467:WP:CRYSTAL 5338:Proposed: 4730:-elect TBD 3958:HairedGirl 3914:HairedGirl 3279:(also see 3181:a bit crap 3006:size issue 2862:Jerzeykydd 2381:Ian Gibson 2164:Color code 2155:Hysteria18 2144:Hysteria18 2107:Farmbrough 1953:Seats won 1715:Physchim62 1705:Edit links 1034:no bold.-- 557:Unresolved 305:"PM-Elect" 154:(Contribs) 110:(Contribs) 6131:117Avenue 6097:117Avenue 6022:117Avenue 5937:117Avenue 5879:117Avenue 5844:117Avenue 5808:117Avenue 5769:117Avenue 5698:117Avenue 5684:117Avenue 5659:This edit 5640:117Avenue 5565:117Avenue 5548:posttitle 5544:posttitle 5530:117Avenue 5526:posttitle 5489:117Avenue 5413:117Avenue 5289:117Avenue 5223:117Avenue 5205:117Avenue 5156:117Avenue 5091:posttitle 5012:117Avenue 4922:117Avenue 4884:117Avenue 4749:something 4638:Help desk 4090:117Avenue 4002:117Avenue 3872:650 seats 3862:650 seats 3632:this diff 3608:JPMcGrath 3555:JPMcGrath 3496:117Avenue 3466:117Avenue 3430:117Avenue 3388:JPMcGrath 3372:--------- 3356:117Avenue 3204:117Avenue 3144:117Avenue 3115:117Avenue 3030:117Avenue 2992:117Avenue 2949:map_image 2919:117Avenue 2915:map_image 2877:117Avenue 2767:117Avenue 2704:117Avenue 2673:117Avenue 2634:117Avenue 2609:Incumbent 2595:117Avenue 2502:117Avenue 2140:map_image 2128:map_image 1781:talk page 1306:Indonesia 706:Domminico 645:Antony-22 90:Archive 9 82:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 71:Archive 3 65:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 5972:previous 5765:majority 5627:contribs 5615:unsigned 5353:Facts707 5221:change. 4659:Contribs 3966:contribs 3922:contribs 3898:). Diff 3896:next_mps 3821:Thanks! 3185:navboxes 2897:see here 2737:contribs 2632:Agreed. 2615:Previous 2576:contribs 2314:Nominee 2233:Nominee 2124:ImageMap 2118:ImageMap 2015:-15.21% 1809:contribs 1769:contribs 1645:Skookum1 1479:Thanks! 599:Anyone? 467:unsigned 287:Done. -- 6043:elected 5448:Markles 5087:-elect" 4650:Hamster 4023:infobox 3864:to the 3823:XLerate 3791:XLerate 3672:cmadler 3640:cmadler 3087:toronto 3019:toronto 2934:Arnoutf 2823:Arnoutf 2727:Andrwsc 2619:Gibnews 2547:snowolf 2174:RockMFR 2083:Arsonal 2018:-2.04% 2012:-0.86% 2004:10.57% 2001:18.53% 1998:21.58% 1660:maclean 1459:Austria 1342:Belgium 901:other. 854:GoodDay 792:GoodDay 398:Llewdor 363:Llewdor 349:Llewdor 275:Padraic 247:Padraic 240:Turnout 227:Noname2 200:Noname2 169:Noname2 149:Barryob 126:Noname2 105:Barryob 39:archive 5369:Centrx 4975:, and 4973:-elect 4231:, and 3962:(talk) 3932:Done. 3918:(talk) 3548:, and 3404:Images 3383:blank. 3263:Greens 3053:(User: 2781:Gnevin 2753:Gnevin 2690:Gnevin 2658:Gnevin 2385:Labour 2358:11.6% 2350:3,350 2347:4,068 2329:Party 2296:14.0% 2293:18.2% 2280:4,803 2277:6,243 2273:13,591 2258:Labour 2249:Party 2057:Golkar 2042:Golkar 2009:Swing 1923:Golkar 1919:Party 1795:& 1718:(talk) 1641:pronto 1577:Today. 1441:Turkey 1423:Mexico 1392:Africa 1387:Uganda 1324:Panama 1293:Africa 511:Double 488:Double 434:Double 414:Double 379:Double 330:Double 312:Wereon 159:(Talk) 115:(Talk) 5977:-ACL- 5894:-ACL- 5716:after 5668:Rrius 5552:title 5522:title 5148:#Flag 4801:Rrius 4645:Super 4549:2007 3956:Brown 3912:Brown 3634:from 3528:Boris 3481:Rrius 3460:with 3444:Rrius 3415:Rrius 3082:nat.u 3014:nat.u 2838:Totie 2458:Help! 2422:Jamie 2361:9.7% 2338:Green 2289:39.5% 1928:PDI-P 1908:100px 1903:110px 1739:Rrius 1405:Japan 1360:Italy 838:it.-- 786:Bold 563:hCard 520:Talk) 497:Talk) 443:Talk) 423:Talk) 388:Talk) 339:Talk) 16:< 6135:talk 6101:talk 6026:talk 6014:this 5981:talk 5941:talk 5898:talk 5883:talk 5848:talk 5812:talk 5773:talk 5702:talk 5688:talk 5672:talk 5644:talk 5623:talk 5593:talk 5569:talk 5534:talk 5520:Use 5493:talk 5475:talk 5417:talk 5402:talk 5397:sroc 5374:talk 5357:talk 5293:talk 5258:talk 5253:sroc 5227:talk 5219:this 5209:talk 5201:this 5190:talk 5185:sroc 5160:talk 5103:talk 5098:sroc 5050:talk 5016:talk 4985:talk 4955:here 4951:here 4926:talk 4911:talk 4906:sroc 4888:talk 4859:. -- 4853:lost 4832:talk 4827:sroc 4805:talk 4790:talk 4785:sroc 4765:talk 4760:sroc 4745:here 4716:talk 4711:sroc 4685:talk 4680:sroc 4656:Talk 4622:talk 4617:sroc 4595:talk 4590:sroc 4576:talk 4571:sroc 4553:2010 4478:talk 4473:sroc 4397:talk 4392:sroc 4337:talk 4318:talk 4313:sroc 4298:talk 4197:talk 4159:talk 4124:talk 4094:talk 4063:talk 4038:talk 4030:that 4006:talk 3990:talk 3949:and 3938:talk 3904:here 3900:here 3894:and 3827:talk 3810:talk 3795:talk 3764:talk 3748:talk 3723:talk 3698:talk 3676:talk 3659:talk 3644:talk 3612:talk 3591:talk 3574:talk 3559:talk 3550:1820 3546:1792 3542:1789 3500:talk 3485:talk 3470:talk 3448:talk 3434:talk 3419:talk 3392:talk 3360:talk 3340:and 3332:Add 3318:and 3314:Add 3308:and 3299:are: 3288:talk 3271:talk 3261:and 3253:and 3222:talk 3208:talk 3193:talk 3148:talk 3134:talk 3130:Dove 3119:talk 3105:talk 3101:Dove 3034:talk 2996:talk 2981:talk 2977:Joy 2957:talk 2953:Dove 2938:talk 2923:talk 2905:talk 2901:Dove 2881:talk 2866:talk 2842:talk 2827:talk 2785:talk 2771:talk 2757:talk 2731:talk 2723:both 2708:talk 2694:talk 2677:talk 2662:talk 2654:flag 2648:Flag 2638:talk 2623:talk 2599:talk 2589:and 2572:talk 2541:here 2525:talk 2506:talk 2487:talk 2472:talk 2449:talk 2333:UKIP 2208:Next 2198:2005 2136:2004 2134:and 2104:Rich 2087:talk 1973:−41 1959:109 1956:128 1913:85px 1873:and 1857:2009 1847:1999 1805:talk 1765:talk 1743:talk 1696:talk 1649:talk 1633:four 1532:talk 1485:talk 1464:WEOG 1446:WEOG 1410:Asia 1365:WEOG 1347:WEOG 1311:Asia 1231:2009 1221:2007 1176:talk 1110:talk 1080:talk 1054:talk 1040:talk 967:talk 959:1976 907:talk 892:1888 890:and 888:1876 874:talk 858:talk 844:talk 796:talk 788:only 775:talk 710:talk 674:and 666:and 649:talk 538:talk 515:Blue 492:Blue 475:talk 438:Blue 418:Blue 402:talk 383:Blue 367:talk 353:talk 334:Blue 316:talk 293:talk 262:talk 231:talk 204:talk 173:talk 130:talk 6113:HTD 6079:HTD 6073:win 5954:HTD 5919:HTD 5861:HTD 5825:HTD 5789:HTD 5742:HTD 5666:. - 5084:or 4964:not 4640::) 4492:HTD 4431:HTD 4358:HTD 4241:not 3964:• ( 3920:• ( 3259:SPD 3255:FDP 3251:CSU 3247:CDU 3057:); 2425:JCA 1976:+1 1970:+8 1962:52 1933:PKB 1637:has 1609:meh 1604:Tim 1522:}} 1164:to 1138:meh 1133:Tim 1000:meh 995:Tim 932:meh 927:Tim 823:meh 818:Tim 736:meh 731:Tim 686:meh 681:Tim 635:to 6137:) 6123:) 6103:) 6089:) 6075:.– 6028:) 6020:. 5983:) 5964:) 5943:) 5929:) 5909:no 5900:) 5885:) 5871:) 5850:) 5835:) 5814:) 5799:) 5775:) 5767:? 5752:) 5727:: 5704:) 5690:) 5674:) 5646:) 5629:) 5625:• 5595:) 5571:) 5536:) 5528:. 5495:) 5477:) 5419:) 5377:• 5359:) 5319:. 5295:) 5285:it 5229:) 5211:) 5203:? 5162:) 5052:) 5018:) 4987:) 4970:, 4928:) 4890:) 4807:) 4780:. 4502:) 4441:) 4368:) 4339:) 4300:) 4292:-- 4227:, 4199:) 4157:- 4126:) 4096:) 4065:) 4036:- 4026:}} 4020:{{ 4008:) 3992:) 3936:- 3906:. 3829:) 3808:- 3797:) 3762:- 3750:) 3721:- 3696:- 3678:) 3657:- 3646:) 3614:) 3589:- 3572:- 3561:) 3544:, 3526:-- 3502:) 3487:) 3472:) 3464:. 3450:) 3436:) 3421:) 3394:) 3362:) 3294:) 3290:) 3273:) 3265:) 3249:, 3224:) 3210:) 3195:) 3150:) 3136:) 3121:) 3107:) 3061:; 3036:) 2998:) 2983:) 2975:-- 2959:) 2940:) 2925:) 2907:) 2883:) 2868:) 2844:) 2829:) 2787:) 2773:) 2759:) 2739:) 2710:) 2696:) 2679:) 2664:) 2640:) 2625:) 2601:) 2593:. 2578:) 2574:, 2549:D4 2527:) 2508:) 2489:) 2474:) 2451:) 2196:← 2153:– 2114:. 2110:, 2089:) 1845:← 1811:) 1807:, 1791:, 1787:, 1771:) 1767:, 1745:) 1734:}} 1728:{{ 1698:) 1651:) 1534:) 1487:) 1219:← 1178:) 1112:) 1082:) 1056:) 1042:) 969:) 961:? 909:) 876:) 860:) 846:) 798:) 777:) 769:-- 728:. 712:) 651:) 607:; 589:; 540:) 477:) 404:) 369:) 355:) 318:) 295:) 264:) 233:) 206:) 175:) 146:-- 132:) 86:→ 6133:( 6117:( 6099:( 6083:( 6038:a 6024:( 5979:( 5958:( 5950:– 5939:( 5923:( 5896:( 5881:( 5865:( 5857:– 5846:( 5829:( 5821:– 5810:( 5793:( 5783:x 5771:( 5746:( 5738:– 5700:( 5686:( 5670:( 5642:( 5621:( 5591:( 5567:( 5532:( 5491:( 5473:( 5446:— 5415:( 5404:) 5400:( 5394:— 5371:→ 5367:— 5355:( 5291:( 5260:) 5256:( 5250:— 5225:( 5207:( 5192:) 5188:( 5182:— 5158:( 5105:) 5101:( 5095:— 5082:" 5077:" 5048:( 5014:( 4983:( 4924:( 4913:) 4909:( 4903:— 4886:( 4864:Ħ 4834:) 4830:( 4824:— 4803:( 4792:) 4788:( 4782:— 4767:) 4763:( 4757:— 4718:) 4714:( 4708:— 4687:) 4683:( 4677:— 4642:~ 4624:) 4620:( 4614:— 4597:) 4593:( 4587:— 4578:) 4574:( 4568:— 4496:( 4488:– 4480:) 4476:( 4470:— 4435:( 4427:– 4399:) 4395:( 4389:— 4362:( 4354:– 4335:( 4320:) 4316:( 4310:— 4296:( 4195:( 4122:( 4092:( 4061:( 4004:( 3988:( 3968:) 3924:) 3825:( 3793:( 3746:( 3674:( 3642:( 3610:( 3557:( 3498:( 3483:( 3479:- 3468:( 3446:( 3432:( 3417:( 3390:( 3358:( 3286:( 3269:( 3220:( 3206:( 3191:( 3146:( 3132:( 3117:( 3103:( 3032:( 2994:( 2979:( 2955:( 2936:( 2921:( 2903:( 2879:( 2864:( 2840:( 2825:( 2783:( 2769:( 2755:( 2734:· 2729:( 2706:( 2692:( 2675:( 2660:( 2636:( 2621:( 2597:( 2570:( 2523:( 2504:( 2485:( 2470:( 2447:( 2210:→ 2085:( 1859:→ 1803:( 1763:( 1741:( 1694:( 1647:( 1614:! 1530:( 1483:( 1466:) 1462:( 1448:) 1444:( 1430:) 1426:( 1412:) 1408:( 1394:) 1390:( 1367:) 1363:( 1349:) 1345:( 1331:) 1327:( 1313:) 1309:( 1295:) 1291:( 1233:→ 1174:( 1143:! 1108:( 1078:( 1052:( 1038:( 1005:! 965:( 937:! 905:( 872:( 856:( 842:( 828:! 794:( 773:( 741:! 708:( 691:! 647:( 536:( 518:( 495:( 473:( 441:( 421:( 400:( 386:( 365:( 351:( 337:( 314:( 310:— 291:( 260:( 229:( 202:( 187:— 171:( 128:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index