4924:
right of representation can only, and only, be earned by qualifying for a "national team" through either a general position in a national ranking or a direct position in a qualifying event. This characterization of the selection process is just false. It's something you see people from the USA frequently do. They think that just because they have national trials in
America, that's how the whole world does it too. Well, wrong. America is not the world. America is a gigantic country where they generally have much more competitors wanting to compete at the Olympics than there are places available for that country. There's a myriad of small or less financially strong countries where they do not have that many sportspeople competing at a high level. I myself live in a small country called Belgium and I frequently see it happen that a competitor from my country competes at the Olympics, especially in the case of the Winter Olympics, through simply having met the international minimum competence standard and being the only Belgian active in that particular discipline. National trials just don't exist here. Thirdly, their claim on how the selection in team competitions work only tells part of the story. Sure, in some the national teams take part in a tournament that doubles as Olympic qualifying. The selection of the players who may compete for those national teams is a purely subjective one. There are no official criteria there. The players do not have to get a specific result in a club competition or something. Often the selection of the players is heavily influenced by commercial reasons. Fourthly, their claim that only the very best compete at the Olympics is also wrong. I have even seen
4977:
some sports. But most importantly for a considerable part of
Olympic history the very best professional sportspeople were not even allowed to compete. It used to be amateurs only. In some sports, they still do not use the top class player. Football, for instance, is an U23 competition and as a result many of the world’s best footballers simply cannot compete at an Olympic event at that given time they are among best. You just have a very clouded view of the subject. More to the subject, representation is a much broader concept than you think. This isn’t limited at all to being picked “for a national team”. There does not need to be a formal selection procedure for representation to exist. In some sports this just works individually and the governing body just de facto consideres– all competitors in their universally recognized –international championships as official representatives. The whole saga concerning the Russians in the FIA’s world championships is more than enough evidence. The resultant FIA’s RAF designation is not in any way different to IAAF’s ANA or the IOC’s OAR. For the rest, the
2996:
principles. The logic and the evidence says that motorsport articles already comply with both FLAG and SPORTFLAG, and that
Knowledge (XXG)'s presentation of motorsport topics is entirely consistent with the manner in which the sport is presented in pretty much every reliable source out there. If this RfC states that RS are to be ignored then Knowledge (XXG) itself has a fundamental problem because that isn't an MoS guide, that is hard policy. I have already been withdrawing from Knowledge (XXG) over the last few years as the number of unpleasant editors has grown. I am tired of having to deal with people who would rather browbeat and threaten others rather than present reasonable argument in good faith supported by proper evidence. I am tired of people who think that any criticism of their discussion tactics is a "personal attack" and that they can themselves get away with attacking others by bluelink spamming in absence of evidence. If this topic is the hill that my Knowledge (XXG) career dies on then I will be sad, but I can't say I didn't see it coming.
4569:
part of the sport's history and how it is operated now, and are certainly a huge part of the wider public presentation of the sport. If the drivers do not represent their countries, why are there strict rules as to how the nationality is recognised? If the drivers do not represent their country why do they hoist flags and play national anthems at the end of every race (in exactly the same manner as for the
Olympics and many others)? If the drivers do not represent their countries why do the official printed race results and the on-screen charts shown by the official broadcaster include national flagicons? Setting up a straw man horror situation of rampant flags for every sport is just not logical. Do these other hypothetical sports have codified nationality rules? Do they have explicit official recognition of nationalities by the governing body, both in official documents and in the presentation of that sport to the wider world? How are those sports for which you are content for flagicons to be used fundamentally different from international motorsport?
3210:. Secondly, people are not disagreeing with me either. Almost everyone has supported flags being used in motorsports articles. Just like I do. And that's where your claim that "People just don't like flags that much" falls through as well. It's actually just a handful who hate flags and go to no lengths to get rid of them. This whole guideline was imposed by a very small group without any community discussion let alone decision. They even boasted how controversial the application of the guideline would be. In reality, people actually like them very much and not just because they "look good" but because they are a handy instrument to make the parsing of information much easier. That's why all sports articles dealing with international competitions and their competitors have them. And that's why I raised this concern. The people who supported the RFC's question just misunderstood what they are supporting. They think they are supporting inclusion, or rather retaining, of the flags when they are in reality supporting deletion.
2541:. The usage is already compliant with both FLAG and SPORTFLAG and no exceptions are being made, so the premise of this RfC is flawed. International motorsport is governed by a long-standing set of rules (ratified by the governing body) that determine the competitor's national representation, those competitors must be recognised by their national motorsport association and have a licence issued by that association, and both national identities and flags are widely used by both official and unofficial reliable sources when representing the sport to the general public. The use of national identities and flags is about as official as you can get in international motorsport. I know some people have difficulties in understanding that you don't need to be part of an exclusive team to represent a nation, but that's how it is in this sport.
4390:? It does not say drivers represent their nations. It says national clubs can issue licenses to drivers who are nationals of that country (9.3.1). It also says they can issue licenses to drivers from another country represented by FIA (9.3.2) and also nationals of countries not represented by FIA (9.3.5). Which I think means literally anybody? But 9.4.2 says whatever country issued you a license, when they hand out awards your nationality is whatever your passport says. So they really don't care: they just want you to pick a country and stick with it for the season. They don't mind if you pick another one between seasons. Just like (9.12) they don't care what you say your name is; just pick one and stick with it.
2719:
sources stating that a
British driver won the last four championships. Representations can take many more forms than just competing with some formal “national team”. The whole saga surrounding the Russian drivers this season is clear cut proof that there is formal representation. As for the “darn guideline”, it has now transpired that its wording had recently been changed without any discussion. This entire RFC is flawed because of that. Is it incidents like that why each guideline has a “use common sense” warning on top. Mindlessly enforcing these things to the letter is plain stupid since even IP’s can change them to their whim. Guidelines are not laws and should not be treated as such.
2921:, but I am not going to go down their underhand and disingenuous route of saying one thing and trying to do another. The problem is that we are not asking for an exemption, and the current usage of flagicons in motorsport articles fully complies with SPORTFLAG already. International motorsports drivers are just as officially representatives of their nations as are soccer players, Olympic sportspeople, or any of the other team sports that they say they have no problem with. Their viewpoint is not supported by the rules of the sport, the practical organizaion of the competitors' registrations and licencing, nor the representation of the sport in the vast majority of reliable sources.
4720:
ways to be selected depending on the sport. National trials isn’t the only used to select them you know, even within the same sport. Some countries use that, for others, especially small ones who’ll never get close to filling the nation quota, getting a result anywhere wich fullfills the international standard is sufficient. In the FIA organized championships the driver adhering to a global standard required to earn a licence from their national governing body for the competition in question is enough to be considered a representative of that nation. Your view of what representation means is far to limited and does not match the real world events at all.
172:: Trying to shoe-horn all of the named box templates into one will result in a complete mess. How do you distinguish historical details from current? How do you differentiate records from different series/championships etc? And why do we need so much biographical detail? If you carry on down that route you may as well replace the whole page with one massive infobox. I can see where you thinking has come from, I just think it's misguided. Far better to have the flexibility of multiple boxes, and as they are all pretty much formatted to a standard they stack quite neatly (see
4949:
represent
Belgium in motorsports? I've cited the FIA rules and it's clear the local auto clubs do not make any such decisions. A Belgian driver could be licensed by a US auto club. If they have a Belgian passport, they "represent" Belgium in F1. It makes no difference how many drivers in a race are Belgian. They could all hold Belgian passports, with licenses from countries around the globe, racing for teams from any country. I cited the FIA rules. Read them. Nationality is of no consequence in any motorsports. FIA puts flags on your TV screen to tell you who to cheer for.
2175:
2971:
flags for motorsports is appropriate in case of formal representation. I do not agree however with the overly strict application of official representation. And that’s what this RFC actually intends to achieve. Limit the usage of the flags in motorsports to a very strict set of cases of an overly strict view of official representation. That’s why I don’t support this RFC’s question and I really think you should reconsider your stance to the RFC question. Bottom line, nothing needs to be newly applied because
724:
those users without the proper background, this is an ambiguous field. I know there's a
Championship, but the first time I saw this field, I thought for sure it was highest single race finish, not championship - and I'm certainly not any sort of lame-brain. Your response does not bring resolution to the problem, it just tells me why ya'll have never changed it. Can this perhaps be a wikilinked field to disambiguate the text? I'm not sure what it would be wikilinked to, but that might assist resolution.
5085:
that it doesn't use the precise phraseology that you demand is neither here nor there. Not only that, but the traditions and procedures of the sport clearly demonstrate that the drivers represent specific nationalities, as does the FIA's adherence to the rules of WADA and CAS, all of which have been cited previously. You can choose to maintain your ostrich pose for whatever reasin you choose, but continual denial of straightforward evidence (without ever providing an hard evidence that the drivers
4777:
They do not give a fuck which country you're from. They care if you're any good. Then you have to get out there and burn their money. You're not competing against other drivers from your country to be an elite driver from your country. Regardless of what your passport says, if you get enough points to race in F1, you race in F1. You have not been chosen as one of the best from your particular country, unlike sports where you do officially represent a country.
22:
4316:(FWIW only flags on nations can be used (or sometimes subnations, or supernations such as "Unified Team" after the USSR fell apart, or "Europe" in worldwide contests). So a personal or city neutral flag can't be used, according the rule. In that case if you're using flags you'd have no flag for Mazepan I think. It depends of whether you think he's using the Russian flag or just a flag that happens to look just like the Russian flag, I guess.
4301:
to 2008. The teams won every
Constructors' Championship from 1979 to 2008... Mercedes drivers won the championship for two years, before the team withdrew from all motorsport in the wake of the 1955 Le Mans disaster..." and so on. Does not sound like these "teams" are representing nations exactly? Sure the "Mercedes" team might be 100% Germans, racing cars made 100% in Germany, but so? No flags here should be used. Right?
71:
53:
1552:{{Infobox racing driver |name = SĂ©bastien Bourdais |image = Bourdais.jpg |caption = Bourdais during his ChampCar days |nationality = {{flagicon|FRA}} ] |birth_date = {{birth date and age|1979|2|28|df=y}} |birth_place = ], ] | record template1 = {{Infobox Champ Car driver|embed=yes |achievements = 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 ] Champion<br /: -->
2330:
2218:
2127:
3419:. Flags, shmags, that's secondary, and I don't much care. If editors are going to be demoralized over this and feel like quitting, we want to make that as few as possible. And a good editor who feels really really really strongly about the issue counts more than a bot-summoned mook like me. Because that good editor might quit, and I won't. There's something to be said for weighing
1414:, I'd be tempted to leave the Nationality parameter in the F1 infobox (at least) in case the nationality under which the driver raced in a particular series differs from their "general nationality" (whatever that means) displayed at the top of the infobox (in F1, a driver races under an identified nationality; the same may be true for other series).
1484:). A top 10 finish is the mark of a good finish in NASCAR. Also, different feeder series are important in particular genres. That's why there's separate infoboxes were made. There is very little information that is common between the motorsport genres. Maybe driver name, hometown/country, image/size/caption, pole positions, and number of wins.
2394:
2299:
2805:- the main problem is that they are NOT representing their countries - new users and IPs are falling into bad habits, encouraged by the breakaway F1 faction giving themselves dispensation to claim national teams. It's just decorative fancruft to riders, teams, circuit layouts, fastest laps from a group of regulars, often in the Far East. See
1321:. notice how in the first version, there are actually three infoboxes at the top of the page. since they are not joined together, and the widths are mismatched, we get a big whitespace gap around the boxes. however, in the second version, I have embedded the second two boxes inside the top box, and the problem is solved.
5106:
sport a non-governmental international body organises a major competition to which competitors are entered through accreditation by their respective international member organisation. In one you can see the valid reasoning that a competitor represents a nation, but in the other you deny that fact. Which is which?
2750:- The discussion below makes it clear why this would only add to confusion. It appears people would use this simply to demonstrate racers nationality at their own whim on when its appropriate, not when they are officially representing a country i.e. they are a nationally designated racer/racing team member. -
4120:(who has not). Both are drivers currently competing in the same national level series governed by an FIA-member body. If what you are arguing is that the SPORTFLAG guide should be more strongly noted then go for it, but use of national flags within the vast majority of motorsport articles already complies.
4882:
what representation mean and how the “right” is earned that just does not match reality. In motorsports the right is earned by earning a licence for the competition in question from the national governing body. And what policy are you even talking about? The only thing we’re discussing here is a guideline.
4697:, just because. It was spectacle, marketing. It's a tool to appeal to a fan demographic, not something that matters. Edwards and Rossi rode for the team of whatever constructor they signed to that season. If Ducati is owned by Audi, are their constructor wins credited to Team Italy or Team Germany? Why?
1440:. you make a good point about the label widths, and it's not entirely necessary that the label widths have to be the same. by embedding a borderless, distinct table, I can make the label widths different for each subsection. or, yet another option, would be to do what we did for the campaignboxes in
5543:
Right now we're just using an un-bulleted list for each of the key/value pairs, but they're not actually lined up as a table or anything, just two lists side-by-side. This doesn't look good when the rendering makes one column too small for the series name or list of years, as it will go over multiple
5122:
What do you mean I cite no evidence? I and others have cited plentiful of evidence. You just keep ignoring it. This is really getting out of hand now. You really need to change your attitude. You act like you have some authority which you patently do not have. You don’t own wikipedia so it’s no up to
4913:
And I stand by my stance that competitors in official international FIA championships do in an official capacity, not just "under a flag". The whole
Russians-in-FIA championships saga proves that beyond any doubt. Moreover, Dennis Bratland's multiple lectures are littered with mistakes. Firstly, they
4304:
If there's some occasional oddity about using a
Russian flag or not, that can be explained in the article. I guess there was a deal with "We're not having any Russians, they cheat, but if you agree to not display your flag it's OK" (seems odd, but whatever), no that doesn't mean anyone in the race is
4280:
representing their country. If the Pan-American Games added car racing, yeah you'd be part of the team same as the gymnasts etc. Otherwise... Well, the Pan-American games has a slot for Guyana (I assume), so if only one athlete comes from there, he's the "team" for that country and gets a flag. So...
3991:
In some series (particularly world championships) competitors are considered representatives of their national sporting authorities and thus the usage of national flags is entirely appropriate. See the recent situation regarding Mazepin not being allowed to race in F1 under the Russian flag. There is
3766:
for a moment - it is a data point, but not more than that - the X argument that the flags help/hinder the reader's comprehension, and/or and or mislead/inform/distract the reader, and/or make the page appearance nicer/uglier (minor point, but not nothing) seems stronger, and here's why...". Hopefully
3709:
I don’t think there is a case of local consensus (save for the creation of this part of MOS itself) so that’s neither here nor there. Moreover, the text at MOS:FLAG does not state that flags do but that they can create undue emphasis. That’s an important difference. If used appropriately, they don’t.
3012:
The question here is very clear. It is also very clear that a yes consensus here doesn't give him the power to do anything as he must first determine that drivers in any individual series do not represent a country, which would require a completely new discussion. Dennis Bratland knows this because I
2894:
representation involves. The discussion below clearly shows their belief that official representation does not exist in motorsports and the flags thus don't belong in their articles. Thus by stating your support for the RFC question you are actually stating that flags should be removed, and that does
1554:
1999 ] Champion |awards = 2003 ] Rookie of the Year |years = 2003–2007 |Total_Champ_Races = 73 etc }} | record template2 = {{Infobox F1 driver|embed=yes | Years = {{F1|2008}}–{{F1|2009}} | Team(s) = ] | Races = 27 etc }} | record
1475:
That merge is an interesting discussion - all of the people who understand how the motorsport driver infoboxes work were opposed and the merge comments weres from the people who knew nothing about motorsport. I wasn't aware of the discussion. I think it's a lousy idea to merge these driver infoboxes.
513:
As far as template usage is concerned, you will see that the former Champ Car driver template makes no specific reference to the series and could easily by called "former American single-seater series driver". It was obviously intended to be interchangeable between Champ Car and the IRL. How could it
5523:
Hi there! Just wondering if someone could add a label for a driver's "Current car"? I thought it was a bit odd there were labels for both car number and the engine (which is only part of the car), but not the car itself. I'm brand new to wikipedia editing so I have no idea how to do it myself (or if
5136:
Maybe I'm just thick, OK? Would you please give me the citation that directly supports the MOS:FLAG criterion that "the subject officially represents that country or nationality – such as military units or national sports teams"? I'm sorry I missed it. Is there a URL? Title, date, author, chapter? I
5105:
As I am here I will repeat my question from further up (that you have conspicuously ignored): in one sport, a non-governmental international body organises a major competition to which competitors are entered through accreditation by their respective international member organisation, and in another
4981:
lies quite patently with you because you are advocating a change. I don’t want to add anything anywhere. I don’t even understand why you claimed I do. The flags are already there and have always been. It rather seems like you want to get rid of them. And that despite Motorsports not being treated as
4776:
To actually compete at the highest level, you need to amass enough points, which means winning or at least placing or finishing in races. To do that, you need a team. And here is the real critical part: you need a constructor or privateer team to decide you are worth spending millions of dollars on.
4670:
or any motorsports. I'd like to see evidence that says "FIA drivers officially represent their country", the same way a FIFA World Cup team officially represents a country. If nationality is so deeply intrinsic to motorsport, why is it so hard to give a simple, clear citation that says that? Why are
4568:
You need to demonstrate that the problem you are claiming to be solving actually exists. I have made specific reference to specific clauses of specific regulations, that codify and recognise the representative nationalities of drivers in international motorsport. These nationalities are an intrinsic
4288:
Mnmh, I see "[[A1 Grand Prix[[ (A1GP) was a 'single make' open wheel auto racing series that ran from 2005 until 2009. It was unique in its field in that competitors solely represented their nation as opposed to themselves or a team, the usual format in most formula racing series." In that case they
4284:
If the All-European Race Championship is like "Every winner of a Grand Prix gets in" or "the ten racers that have the fastest speeds in time trial get in", or just "the ten racers we subjectively think are the best get invites" no, you're not representing a country. You're a random dude who got into
4080:
Not at all. I have specifically identified that I am talking about international motorsport governed by the FIA, and we are specifically discussing this infobox which isn't intended for use for the other sports you have cited. I don't know about the other bodies, but that might be something you want
3294:
Alright. On consideration, maybe project members (if they're doing significant real work and not mostly fussing about formats) should get special consideration. Projects do and are allowed to set their own standards for formatting and naming. The ships project names their articles different from all
3260:
So... alright, I'm not up on the politics of all this. I guess what I'd suggest is to advise the closer of the situation, where people are voting wrongly and opposite to what they think they are. Definitely something she should know. Put it as a top-level comment, bolded like a !vote, so she can see
2970:
I’m not saying you should be against your principle. I’m saying that that this RFC is inherently flawed. There is a misapplication of the wording. There should really not be any consequence of this RFC. It should be withdrawn or declared invalid because of its flawed premise. I too agree that use of
2718:
See, that’s the same problem that keeps recurring over and over again. On overly strict personal opinion of what formally representing means. Just because they don’t say “the UK won the last 4 championships” it doesn’t mean there is no formal representation in any way. You’ll still find countless of
2699:
or the Olympics or any other of a plethora of sports where individuals or teams represent their country in an obvious way. Not racing. In regards to the clarification request below, my direct opinion is that athletes should not have a flag unless they're formally representing their country, and that
2677:
They do not merely represent their teams as you claim. Drivers and teams compete in separately scored championships and drivers represent their countries in the drivers' championships. Likewise, drivers and teams winning races are celebrated separately. Most importantly, representation does not only
1834:
problems, since the information is aligned in a way that can be properly parsed by a screen reader. to see the issue, try to cut and paste the contents of the section, and you will see that you get all the years followed by all the titles, rather than year/title, year/title, ... of course, this is
804:
By "users" do you mean readers? If so, say so. So you don't think that your average motorsport fan will understand that "Best finish: 3rd in 2005" means exactly the same here as it does in the info panels of just about every English-language motorsport periodical in print? If they are not motorsport
723:
How many users are knowledgeable about this kind of thing? Not enough. Truly, this encyclopedia is best used as a tool for understaning the basics (and finding references for more detail), users should not be expected to have prior knowledge of a subject before entering any single article. Thus, for
5439:
the series "Formula Regional European" is too long to display on a single line, so it breaks after the second word. This means the word "European" lines up with the dates for the next series, "F3 Asian Championship", while the latter lines up with the dates for "MRF Challenge Formula 2000" which is
4881:
Why on earth do you concede that? The whole Mazipin (and other’s alike) sage is pure evidence that they are official representatives. And because they are official representatives he is not allowed to represent Russia because of the sanctions imposed. This person simply has an overly strict view of
4816:
You're completely right. The problem is that defenders of flags on racing articles shift at their convenience between "racing is different; don't hold it to the same standard as other sports" and "racing isn't different and all motorsports competitors are official representatives of their country".
4719:
You need to realize that official representation is far broader than just competing with an official national team. Many sportspeople represent their nationality individually. Moreover the olympic way is not the only way to determine representation. And even within the Olympics there are myriads of
4331:
Well be thankful that in the case of international motorsport it isn't up to us to decide whether or not someone is representing their country! These facts are all strictly and carefully codified by the FIA and its members, and these regulations are available for free at their website. This applies
4300:
teams? "This period featured teams managed by road-car manufacturers Alfa Romeo, Ferrari, Mercedes-Benz, and Maserati; all of which had competed before the war... Drivers from McLaren, Williams, Renault (formerly Benetton), and Ferrari, dubbed the "'Big Four', won every World Championship from 1984
2694:
Drivers "represent" themselves in the drivers' championship. The "representation" of the country is not in a meaningful way (nobody says "the UK won the last 4 F1 championships in a row"). I mean, yeah, sure, they play the anthem at the end of the podium ceremony, but it's purely ceremonial and not
2654:
Since racing drivers rarely, if ever, represent a nation in a meaningful sense (F1 drivers represent teams which are definitively not national , North American racing drivers (NASCAR, Indycar) represent something which is clearly not a national team, ...), I don't see what this RfC seeks to change.
1759:
that is definitely a viable option. The only drawback of that approach is (1) it does easily lend itself to splitting the individual records into article sections, and (2) it requires the editor to use the appropriate field labels for the particular sport. on the positive side, it doesn't require
846:
I do not believe the width should be changed, I think you all are quite right in that; it is already a "wide" box, relatively speaking. I do think that wikilinking the field "Best finish" to a descriptive article (there must be one with regards to "racing championship" or some such) would be useful
5337:
years ago. As such WP:MOTOR was never behaving differently at all. The strict official nature of representation was never required by this guideline. It was one rogue editor who added that a while ago without any form of discussion. Given that many consensuses had already been formed based on that
5005:
If you were a real expert you could easily educate us and banish our "limited knowledge", using the store of evidence a real expert would have at their fingertips. What you are is a guy clinging to an opinion that you're unwilling to change. An opinion you're incapable of defending with verifiable
4532:
The point of SPORTFLAG is explained in SPORTFLAG. You accuse people who have provided hard evidence and examples of "handwaving", yet you haven't demonstrated where the problem lies. Can you show some examples of this infobox being used not in compliance with SPORTFLAG, then at least we would know
4447:
for some advice on that particular field of knowledge. There are probably others, go take a look. However, for international motorsport then, yes, competing at international level means that the competitor complies with SPORTFLAG. For those drivers who have not competed at international level (see
4370:
Chapter 7 of the document you just linked to (although that's the 2007 one), and Article 9.4 in the current 2021 code. As far as the sport is concerned drivers represent their nations. As stated above, you do not need to be part of a team to represent a country if that is simply not how things are
2995:
For the last 15 years I have tried to believe that Knowledge (XXG) operates on logic, evidence and collegial discussion. I will not abandon that belief now. If this RfC results in "dramatic consequences" then I'm afraid that will, for me, be the final nail in the coffin for that set of fundamental
2735:
Even the now (reverted?) guideline still reads the same thing, that is, that putting flags gives undue prominence to one field in particular. Whether "officially" or "actually" (FWIW, the best word would be "meaningfully" - someone playing cricket or football for England does represent the country
1579:
yes, that is exactly what I am saying. the idea is to not make a single template for all motor sports, but to move all the common information to this template, and to allow for the templates to be glued together as DH85868993 has illustrated. if the article is split into distinct sections for each
881:
Since you asked, I hardly ever use WP as a reference source (that may change if the world runs out of paper any time soon), but when I do, my readings are confined to things in which I am interested and at least adequately knowledgeable. There is nothing precisely relevant to which the field title
5313:
It's not dishonest at all. Look at the page history, in November someone changed the wording without discussion or consensus. I believe that I can show that the use of flags in Formula One article does satisfy the guidelines, and will argue my case in full when that discussion opens. But you keep
5084:
We already have on many occasions, and each time you twist your position to demand yet more, different, and specific proofs. As already stated, Article 9.4 of the FIA International Sporting Code very clearly describes the official recognition of a competitor's representative nationality. The fact
4976:
I have already provided detailed descriptions of the falsehoods. I’m not going to repeat myself. There is another one in your last post. You keep insisting that is only the best who are selected for olympics. That’s just not true. Commercial reasons play a big part too. Wildcards are also used in
4923:
based on an inherently flawed comparison with other sports and competitions who simply use their own independent means of determining representation. Just because Olympics do it one way that doesn't make it the one and only universal way. Secondly, they keep clinging to the false thought that the
3165:
Anyway... I've had to swallow losing various wars that I felt strongly about. If feels bad, but at the end of the day you're going to lose some. There's nothing wrong with the process here. People just don't like flags that much and and want to use them as conservatively as reasonably possible in
2953:
But the thing is that I do support the application of SPORTFLAG to motorsport articles. This RfC was raised specifically to reinforce that SPORTFLAG and similar MoS guide principles should apply in international motorsport. They do, they are, and they have been for years. So why would I now argue
2823:
Save for the fact they ARE representing their countries. Representation does not only happen as part of a "national team". People can easily represent their nations individually as well. And I also do not appreciate your bad-faith characterization of a "breakaway F1 faction" There just is no such
1092:
I noticed that this template's outer border is bright red in IE6. It looks fine in other browsers. There was a redundant hex colour value (#FF0000) in the style declaration, but removing it and clearing my cache has made no difference. The correct #dfdfdf colour value is still there and should be
5002:
That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. What you say makes no impression on me because you cite no evidence. You pretend to have greater knowlege but everyone knows bluster and bluffing when they see it. How many thousands of self-styled "experts" have been
4948:
Smaller countries have smaller pools of qualified athletes. Irrelevant. If you're the only curler in Belgium, you're also the best curler in Belgium. If there are two curlers and the IOC gave Belgium only one slot, the Belgians have to pick one of them. To represent Belgium. Who picks drivers to
4549:
You haven't cited anything. Not one thing. I'm the one who did that work, and I demonstrated the FIA rules say do not say what you claim. You're claiming if FIA identifies which country a driver is from, that's good enough. That means anybody, in any sport, whose governing body asks what country
3682:
explicitly say that MOS takes precedence over a few editors at a certain place at a certain time, and that this isn't a headcount. No one has given a reason yet why the assumption behind the text at MOS:FLAG (that using a flag puts undue emphasis on something which isn't really that fundamental,
3460:
deals with this guideline differently in relation to articles on its competitions and competitors than other sports wikiprojects with similar articles is simply incorrect. The problem that is raised here just doesn't exist. In any case I cannot support the RFC question because of the initiator's
1829:
one thing that your example demonstrates is that we should really do something about the year/title alignment issues in the "Championship titles" section. the only reliable way to fix this is to split the section into years1/title1, years2/title2, ... or to use "nowwrap", but nowrap could cause
1460:
but the stacking is done by the template). in any event, perhaps the broader suggestion here is to reduce the redundancy between these boxes by putting the common information in this template and reducing the specific templates to "record/career" templates. how these are combined is a separate
751:
Anyone who adds templates such as this to relevant articles will be doing so with some knowledge of motorsport, or they would have no need of such a template. Without some knowledge, they are not in a position to know whether anything that they add is suitable (not just in the template) and they
517:
Past participations are clearly less relevant to the affected championship, so our motorsport templates below F1 level have traditionally not included such levels of detail. But, just to keep you happy, I have done what you could easily have done yourself - the template now has fields for a last
4407:
So you are arguing that despite having detailed rules governing which nationality they recognise, they don't then consider that driver to be representing that nation? Right, interesting. Wrong, but interesting. Other sports have similarly complex nationality rules. If they didn't care about the
5384:
Regardless of who is at fault (spoiler: you are at fault), the RfC is skunked. You edited the MOS after several editors replied to the survey and there was considerable discussion based on the original wording. There's no way anybody will be able to identify consensus when we don't know if the
4352:
somewhere? Where? Driver licenses are administered by national automobile clubs, but getting a license from a country's club doesn't make a driver an official representative of the country. Drivers have as little to do with others from the same national club as drivers from some other country.
4111:
You'll have to look up the North American series (do NASCAR and Indycar have similar regulations and cultural baggage?) but the vast majority of other motorsport worldwide is governed by the FIA. That being the case the normal application of FLAG and particularly SPORTFLAG is expected. See the
1710:
one or more single-series templates, the name/birth_date/death_date fields are not populated in the single-series templates, so the information is only displayed once (at least that's what is supposed to happen - on the odd occasion when I come across the same information displayed in multiple
642:
I could add some fields to this (quite easy, though I'm not sure where to place them) and make another pro-forma, but perhaps it might be better if you were to make a dedicated template, depending on exactly what data you want to include and how you want to display it. I'm not aiming for total
5298:
was the standard and motorsports meets that standard. You're pretending it was different wording all along. The truth is motorsports can't meet the "official" criterion and motorsports editors want a looser standard. That was my point! Instead of admitting I was right about that you call me a
4188:
I agree with HumanBodyPiloter5. Motorsport athletes do represent their national authorities, and even if they didn't nationality plays a pretty big role in motorsport anyway. I'm obviously talking from an F1 fan's perspective, but we hear no end of "this driver has achieved the 430th X from Y
849:
I really don't think the accesibility we provide users/readers in these articles is irrelevant. Information in Knowledge (XXG) is not just for us, only editors, or only fans, its for everybody. Why wouldn't we want to make it accessible and comprehensible to the average person no matter their
673:
There's an ambiguoug field on the template "Best finish". I know this template says it should be the championship finish; however, some users will think it is the best race finish (ie - checkered?). I don't know how to solve this, yet, but perhaps others know of a way to make this more clear?
4151:
So in one sport, a non-governmental international body organises a major competition to which competitors are entered through accreditation by their respective international member organisation, and in another sport a non-governmental international body organises a major competition to which
702:
There is nothing really ambiguous about that for anyone who is knowledgeable about motorsport, and all they need to do is look at the pro-forma. It is the same term that we have always used, partly because of the width constraints. I tend to check each new use of the template to look out for
456:
Actually, no, there is no other template for that series. That's why I'm using this one. If a field exists for this template, it should work whether the driver is deceased or not. If your template doesn't work with deceased drivers, then it shouldn't even be built to handle such information.
4865:
I think one of the problems we have here is confusion as to when "unofficial representation" becomes "official". I am personally of the belief that racing drivers racing under a flag (whether it is just hype or because the national anthem is played when they win or whatever reason) they are
5171:
Dennis Bratland, As far as I can see, you have provided three sources, two of which are irrelevant and the third which supports the opposing view, but you have attempt to make a convoluted arguement that doesn't hold under any level of scrutiny. Your arguement, therefore, has zero basis in
4048:
That may be because you have set up a straw-man argument. International-level sport does not exclusively consist of country vs. country competition. Different sports operate in different ways but they may all recognise the WADA and CAS. If the WADA say that Russian athletes are banned from
1172:
which distinguishes between "living" and "deceased" persons, in part, by shading the infobox differently for those states: gold and gray, respectively. Maybe some will not see this as an issue, but we could create greater consistency, unity, etc. across the wiki by addressing this issue.
1580:
sport, then they need not be glued together, but there is no reason to list the same information multiple times in each box. whatever works well for the particular article, but the option to glue them together is there. by the way, this module idea is not new, if you check the code for
1476:
They resulting merged infobox would be far too complicated to be useful. The problem is what accomplishments are important in some series are not important in others series. A top 3 (podium) finish is the mark of a high finish in some series (formula 1, motocross, off-road racing like
4842:
Can I ask again: Why am I the only one citing any sources? I keep being told "you need to understand", "this is how it is", "you need to realize" but nobody cites anything as a reason why I should do that. If you must have a certain level of expertise to comprehend the sources, then
3109:
Second of all, it's just flags. It's not worth shitcanning a 15 year career over. It's not mission-critical to what we're doing. I get that if you work and sweat in a particular area you want your articles to look (what you think of as) pretty. It's reasonable that the person who
5463:. :-) The same also applies to the {{{titles}}} and {{{title years}}} parameters. I suspect the trickiest bit will be migrating the existing articles to use the new parameters. But that doesn't have to be done immediately, and we could possibly/probably get a bot to assist.
4762:
requirement, certifying only that you have shown minimum ability to drive in an F1 event. It does not certify that you've won races. There's a huge contrast: for FIFA or the Olympics, what you do to get in is prove you're good; not only that, you have to prove you're the
4838:
motorsports, F1, FIA, MotoGP, Supersport and Superbike motorcycles, and then as evidence point only one category of that, like F1 or FIA. If MOS:FLAG does apply to all motorsports, proving that F1 drivers are the same as World Cup teams is relevant only to F1, not all
3546:
a user unilaterally changed that wording without any form of discussion regarding that. That changed wording just didn't reflect the actual spirit of this guideline. With the original wording I actually support the question but it will reiterate that it's moot because
776:
It is not about me, it is not about editors - it is about users. Not all users understand that that is a Championship field; I'm looking for solutions/suggestions on how to disambiguate this field and alleviate confusion among users - I'm not looking for a brick wall.
210:
That's four templates, which is absolutely the bare minimum that is practical for all the subjects and WikiProjects involved. This merger proposal and the addition of unwanted biographical fields appears to have been born from a lack of understanding of motorsport.
5440:
likewise too long. This approach with a pair of lists, where each entry can be of any length, can never line up properly. The template should instead accept {{{prev series N years}}} and {{{prev series N}}} parameters and insert them as additional infobox rows.
3656:. I'm not voting because this question is too complicated and politically/emotionally fraught for bot-summoned randos like me to vote. I don't care a whole huge lot either way, really. These guys do and they're the ones doing the work. Just will point out that
5123:
you to accept or not accept flags. We do not have justify anything to you. Knowledge (XXG) is a community project and works on community consensus. And the community already decide a long time ago that the usage of flags in motorsports articles is appropriate.
4136:
Whatever. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. An editor who wants to stick a flag on an article needs to cite evidence the driver is an official representative of that country. All your handwaving amounts to nothing.
5524:
I'm even allowed.) I tried playing around with the sandbox page earlier and realized I was only editing the documentation part of the page instead of the actual parameters themselves, so I think it's best if I leave it to someone else. Thanks for your help!
3604:
based on this your yes/support votes are now ambiguous. Do you mean that motorsport articles to use flags in line with the guideline, or the more constricted, only when "officially representing"? Please clarify your votes accordingly. (I will also add a
3139:
But I guess there was an impasse so somebody made an RfC. When that happens you're going to get people like me dropping who isn't up who's doing the work and anything else about the politics here. Got the break the impasse somehow, and this is the usual
5342:
only reverted that unacceptable change. It's sad that you were misled like this, but it's the simple reality. It would really serve you well now to withdraw this sorry mess that this RFC has become instead of trying to get everyone disagreeing with you
1009:
All we really need to do here is change the label of the field to "best season finish". There have been several cases lately where this has been changed to reflect the best race finish of a particular driver. I think that one word here will clarify.
3683:
especially in cases like this) is wrong. Ergo, there's no convincing argument why ignoring that guideline would make the affected pages better, except for putting some more flagcruft on them. And aesthetics are subjective, so that's not a good reason.
3304:... which we all use a lot, even if we don't know it. Nobody thinks "The flags are really good, and appropriate, help the reader and make the article better, but alas I must vote to delete per FLAGS". Good thing too because that'd be silly and robotic.
466:
But you should not need to have such detailed data in an infobox for a retired or dead driver. Only the F1 project insists on that level of minutiae. And if you think there are no templates for American single seater drivers, you should take a look at
3083:
So, a couple things: the RfC is clear enough (it's not written perfectly, but I think everyone is getting what the question is). Don't ask for it to be quashed just because you're losing. It's not browbeating if people are just not agreeing with your
4448:
the Plato vs. Sutton example I gave you up the page) then they wouldn't comply and flags shouldn't be used. It really is pretty straightforward. Far from making SPORTFLAG meaningless, the vast majority of motorsport articles actually already comply.
813:? Besides, we are limited by infobox width, unless you want to overturn the decision taken earlier this year (with which I agree) that all motorsport infoboxes should be 24em. We have no room for lengthy field titles (particularly unnecessary ones).
908:
or something similar that can discuss a bit all those series with championship races; it is a very popular, common term/element in motorsport that makes sense to have an article for (or at least a list); I know only enough about motorsport to watch
176:). Also, maintaining separate boxes allows each specialist Wikiproject to adjust their box details, without risking damage to something not linked to their field of knowlege. (As an F1/sportscar fan I haven't got a clue about NASCAR for example...)
843:
is a motorsports fan? Do you look up articles about politicians? Are you a politics fan? Do you look up articles about authors? Are you an author fan? Do you look up articles about sandwiches? Are you a sandwich fan? You look up articles to learn
3992:
a long standing convention here that keeps coming under attack by MOS purists under wholly ideological grounds. I don't like the fact that these nationalistic elements frequently make their way into sport but I don't try to deny their presence.
4767:. You don't have to be any good at all to get a license from your national auto club. You're really only proving that you can drive the car without killing somebody. It's not evidence that you are an elite driver, only evidence that you are a
4703:
is written to draw a bright line between official representatives, such as elected leaders, military forces, and a narrowly-defined set of sports competitions. Not all sports, where nationality is often publicized but is otherwise irrelevant.
421:
This template does not work well for deceased drivers as if you want to enter stats for the last series they drove in, it forces you to treat that series as a "current series" and then displays the current year, even though they are dead. See
5137:
want to re-read the words I apparently failed to notice that say they officially represent their nationality. Show me the citation, and identify for me where that text that says it is in the citation, and my opinion will change. Thank you. --
3539:
I knew there was something that didn't add up. I was a participant in the motorsports RFC years and I remember very well that there was no such strict clampdown on "official" representation as there was presented here. It turns out that just
151:; rally drivers don't do "laps" or "poles". Other circuit racing infoboxes could possibly be merged, but unless the proposed overall template is cut down to remove such "performance" info (and I think you'll have a hard job getting that past
2954:
that they don't? I am not going to debase this process by saying something I don't believe in just because the originator of this RfC plainly has another issue that they are trying to force through by misrepresenting the current consensus.
4800:
RfC? The RfC asks "Should mororsport articles only use flags where subject officially represents that country or nationality?" (Not direct quote). "do racing drivers (officially) represent a country or nationality" is a completely separate
2400:
Done, sort of. Since the left column has "Championships" and "Former teams" in it, there is plenty of room for "Car number" without a potentially confusing abbreviation that many readers will not understand. I changed "no." to "number". –
3191:
And genuinely sincere appreciation who for you guys who are building up this part of the Knowledge (XXG) while I'm off in my area. As a bot-summoned drop-in: thank you all. And I hope this doesn't affect anyone's enthusiasm for the work.
3771:(or all voters, depends on closer's inclination) should matter. If the project members are 9-2 in favor of X, that's a strong argument for X because it's kind of a matter of aesthetics which can't be proven "right" or "wrong" by logic.
3226:
Sure it's a battle. Examine your emotions, you know it's true. And that's OK. We're humans. We want to keep the battling lowkey here, we don't always succeed 100%, and that's life. And both sides feel strongly I guess, it's not just one
1788:
Here's the thing, we can't apply the template to all racing drivers. I was thinking of making a American motorsports driver template based off of that, excluding the fastest laps of course, but including former teams a driver has driven
566:. I really appreciate your work on this template and I care about this so much because I feel that a powerful yet generic infobox template can really improve the quality of WP:Motorsport articles and greatly increase infobox usage. -
4152:
competitors are entered through accreditation by their respective international member organisation. In one you can see the valid reasoning that a competitor represents a nation, but in the other you deny that fact. Which is which?
4671:
we always being asked to infer it instead of reading it in plain English in a reliable source? Normally when a Knowledge (XXG) editor can't produce a reliable source that says what they want it to, it's because they're violating
4918:
of proving their right lies with them, not us. And so far they brought no evidence whatsoever that racing drivers are not official representatives in any way in any situation. The only thing they have posted here is a personal
4612:
Why do they hoist flags? For the same purpose as why do they play March of the Toreadors (or whatever the proper name is), with barbaric connotations? Why do they spray fizzy drink (except in dry countries, perhaps). ANSWER:
602:
I'm not sure this template can be applied that well to all the pre-WDC racers. Grand Prix racing then consisted of the majority of races not being part of any championship, so how should that be conveyed using this template?
2523:, you can also include flags in the person's infobox in their bio, but only of countries they've formally represented, and guess all-or-none is common sense. I don't think that's a great idea, but the rule does say you can.
4736:
Can you show me any citation saying that an FIA license means you are an official representative of a country? Why can I find thousands of quality citations that verify "the sky is blue" or "water is wet" but none that say
5638:
I agree that this is an issue that needs looking into. However, this solution ends up generating a large amount of white space, where the event name ends up with, frankly, excessive padding. Is there a way around this?
328:
For the record, I'm not saying we should remove the info entirely, but where a person's birth/death dates are recorded in the lead sentence anyway (as they should be), having them in the infobox seems superfluous to me.
3299:
to defer to the FLAGS rule if you really don't want. And people here should say "I don't like the flags and I think they detract from the look or mislead the reader" rather than "must be removed per FLAGS". Cogitate on
2158:. In some cases a specific country's racing licence is necesssary to drive that certain series or the matter of age etc. Btw, sometimes the licence is also confused with nationality, which this field helps to avoid. --
5380:
representatives until you came along and moved the goal post. None of you are going to admit it. Look at Tvx1 pretending they meant something else entirely all along. I don't know how to deal with someone who is that
4065:
This is an attempt to argue that all motorsports, from speedboats to motocross trials to drag racing, are all based on nationality. Claiming to respect the MOS guidelines while in fact throwing them out the window.
3028:
As to "The initiator's actual intention seems to be the mass removal of flags from motorsports articles...", well, I was bot-summoned and I get that that was his intention, and it's fine. It's a legit intention to
4830:
Anyway, you can't deal with the second question until you get past the first. So the first step is this RfC. A bunch of people are making off-topic arguments, which I don't mind. But you're' right: they're mostly
253:
Just as an aside, why include biographical details in the infobox at all? I don't see its relevance to the driver's career (which is what the infobox is summing up), and it may cause issues with those who enforce
3671:
is a guideline (=suggestion) way down on a big page) and often do, on minor matters of formatting. And of course this is all to the good. We're not ExxonMobile or any other top-down rule-bound organization here.
2635:
doesn't have a Russian flag). The grey line (and presumably what inspired this discussion) is which drivers are/aren't representing their nations. This is a case-by-case issue and can not be sloved by a blanket
2890:. I would strongly suggest you reconsider your support !votes here. The initiator's actual intention seems to be the mass removal of flags from motorsports article through an overly strict application of what
1662:
sounds reasonable, although I think it's best if we don't repeat name/birth_date/death_date information. nationality is, of course, a different matter if that nationality is related to the particular series.
4189:
country)" and a driver's national flag is always highly visible. If the current practice is inconsistent with MOS – and I don't think it is – then it's the MOS that should be changed, no established practice.
1648:(which has already been done), but not to remove the "common fields", so they can still be used as standalone infoboxes if desired (including locating different infoboxes in separate sections of an article).
4639:. As I also said above which articles do/don't have national representation is a case by case basis as there are definetly some motorsports that don't have national represntation. It is up to the editors at
4428:
is meaningless. Right? Can you point out any case where you couldn't put a flag icon in an infobox? Hence the point of this RfC: if this guideline doesn't apply to motorsport, it doesn't apply to anything.
756:. I could change the field name in the code to make it clear for you, but if any field names don't match the displayed titles, I get other editors complaining and I'm not going over that old ground again.
5372:
Should the guidelines at MOS:FLAG be applied to motorsport topics and infoboxes, consistent with any other topic, generally only using flag icons "where the subject officially represents that country or
4780:
After you've done that, and you're entered in an international race, the marketing guys will put flags all over things to hype up the fans. But your nationality had nothing to do with how you got there.
4932:
who was only allowed to compete because he met the minimum competence standard and was the only British competitor in his discipline. You see, Dennis Bratland's claims are just littered with falsehoods.
4249:
Motorsports aren't the same as the olympics or the world cup as drivers aren't (generally) selected for a national team. But that doesn't mean they aren't national representives. As a specific example,
4349:
4955:? Read it. You want to add flag icons to articles, and that means you must provide a citation that directly supports the criterion that the subject is an official representative. You want to violate
5187:
This has become entirely moot now because the "official" status was never actually a requirement for this guideline to begin with. The wording was changed without any discussion a short while ago.
2062:
My only concern is that driver rankings are not static. Are you proposing that every ranking a driver holds in his career be added to the chart? Listing only his most recent ranking is a bit of
1865:
Yes, the "Championship titles" section needs a new format. Your proposal can work. How about a simple box, there you write whatever you want? So you would write "2006 W Championship< br / : -->
1136:(gold=alive, silver/gray=dead). Not good. I would suggest a change, but to what color, I'm not sure. The gold of those infoboxes might be okay, or maybe a shade of blue. Options can be viewed at
752:
would not have any particular interest in adding a template in such circumstances. You wouldn't find me doing anything other than basic typo/grammar fixing in a mathematics article, for example.
4742:
the Olympic committee of a given country makes the decision on which of their athletes will fill the quota the IOC has given them. The decision does not, technically, rest with your government.
2736:"meaningfully", a racing driver: not really), F1 is not a discipline where driver nationality is really important. No point wasting our time, since it appears we fundamentally disagree on that.
4685:
There's a quota of Olympic slots and a UK athlete has to compete to get one of them. Any number of UK drivers can enter an FIM event, with no concern for how many other UK drivers there are.
576:
Thanks for the appreciation, Drdisque. My effort to improve it really grew out of the recent merge proposal and a desire to avoid a complete merger, but it needed doing anyway, to be honest.
4817:
Valentino Rossi is an official representative of Italy. Mercedes-Benz is an official representative of Germany. Chrysler is an official representative of... uh...? the Netherlands, mostly?
2824:
thing. Every article within WP:MOTOR dealing with an officially sanctioned international championship is dealt with in the exact same manner. F1 does not get a special treatment in any way.
2096:, is that much different than only including the driver's current team, rather than every one in every championship, as we do now? I don't know if we do need this or not, but I don't think
4986:. I have not accused you of lying in an attempt to mislead. I have merely pointed that you made false, meaning incorrect, claims and clearly so you have a limited knowledge of the subject.
1895:
There's a discussion in progress at WP:MOTOR regarding possible changes to the "previous series" fields of this infobox. You are welcome to express any views you may have on the matter at
4026:
And so the convoluted reasoning leads us to believe that F1 the same as the World Cup and the Olympics? F1 is a competition between official representatives of their respective countries?
5329:
Yes, you are in reality just as much a victim as the rest here. The wording based on which you started this RFC was not the long-standing wording all the sports Wikiprojects, including
239:
I've added the standard biography fields (date & place of birth and death; spouse, parents, children). All are optional. Please feel free to change the running order, if preferred.
5653:
This seems to be an issue with the mobile sites rendering of the medals template, the spacing is about the same in the desktop site. I can look at creating a custom template for this.
1128:
Um, I was just looking at the template now that the red border in IE has been fixed, and what I see is that all these race car drivers are dead when utilizing the standard applied to
5477:
I replied below with a solution that I think will work, though it renders a bit weird on the mobile wikipedia. You can check the /testcases page to view the changes I made/proposed.
4281:
by the same logic if the All-European Race Championship has a assigned slot(s) for Germany and a slot(s) for Italy etc, I guess they're their country's entry and so they get a flag.
1433:
4647:
to justify these specific flags, though it does look like a violation to me. I am certainly not aware that you could compete as Northern Irish seperatly to English (both being UK)
4680:
2937:
Which is exactly why it would be better to withdraw your support. This RFC is inherently flawed and it concluding with a support consensus will result in dramatic consequences.
1348:. If all goes well, I envision the specialized boxes as being simple "record/career section" boxes that just get embedded into the main racing driver box. what do you think?
1168:
For clarification, it is great the red border was fixed. Now, though, the solid gray background is more prominent and it immediately made me think of the infobox style used at
497:
He is NOT a Champ Car driver. Also, why should retired or dead drivers have less detail than active ones? I see no reason why they shouldn't other than your personal opinion. -
2245:
5600:
we would be able to consistently and properly render the years/series on any device or setting. This would also not break any current pages, as it would be separate from the
3651:
Not voting GO/NOGO, instead, here's my "vote": Defer to headcount of project contributors (if there's a significant majority either way), and/or strength of argument; ignore
5460:
5385:
editors are supporting the wording from the beginning of the RfC or the new wording you came along and threw in from left field. It's a waste of everyone's time to continue.
4353:
They're independent. If the US Hockey Team wins a medal, the whole team gets a medal. If a British driver wins a Grand Prix, that means nothing to the other British drivers.
1896:
4251:
902:
Most editors seem not to use it as a particularly strong reference; I tend to only use it for non-technical (ie - pop culture) and a place to look for outside references.
130:
5089:
represent their particular nationality, which is interesting) starts to look like you have an axe to grind rather than a genuine intention to improve this encyclopedia.
436:
I don't see the need for such stats if they are retired, dead, or otherwise not competing. There are other templates for the series that warrant such levels of detail.
3378:
want such-and-and-such and it's common to give significant deference to project members majority wishes on minor formatting stuff like this". You can ask. You need to
3114:
should get to decide non-critical things like layout and prettifications. You work and sweat and here's some bot-summoned mook telling you can't. It sucks, I get that.
1313:
I added a few new parameters to this template to allow for "record/career infoboxes" to be embedded in this one. to give you an idea what I am talking about, compare
4898:
I was speaking in general. Natrually, there are series which are exceptions. There is a difference between racing under a flag, and doing so in an official capacity.
4663:
4011:
4667:
4644:
4097:
It says "This infobox is used for any drivers with significant current or recent participations outside Formula One, the WRC, or NASCAR". It's not only for FIA. --
1213:
use team colors for active players and gray for retired ones (living or dead). I think this is a non-issue and this sort of context only exists in Infobox Actor. -
3058:, right? It's no good having articles doing it differently and fighting over it. Well, I was bot-summoned, and after considering the matter I say ditch the flags.
2455:
in the middle of the discussion. Which version editors have in mind is unclear and so no clear consensus is possible. Withdrawing question as original poster per
5275:
I was restoring the wording that had actually been agreed upon, rather than the wording one editor imposed, undiscused. You say we haven't support are argument,
4424:
So we put flags on all international sports? Is there any international competition that doesn't administer competitors in geographical divisions? You're saying
2584:
meaningless. Competitors are often hyped with national identity to appeal to fans, but that's as true in boxing or tennis as motorsports. If we're going to have
1962:
if an infobox is not updated for some time, it can present the incorrect information that a driver is competing in the current season, when in fact they are not.
4982:
an exception in any way. In fact, it would actually become an exception to all other sports if motorsports’ flags would be removed. Lastly, I have not violated
1450:. in that case, the campaignboxes are visually distinct boxes, but they are attached to the bottom of the infobox (basically doing what is currently done with
305:
with the way BLP is enforced, I'm simply saying that biographical details not directly pertinent to a person's notability are often removed. In fact, there's a
1542:, such that instead of multiple infoboxes, the reader sees a single infobox with multiple sections. For example, in SĂ©bastien Bourdais' article you would have:
325:, two pages I've authored. Heard of either of them? They're both internationally successful at what they do, yet they both need day jobs to support themselves.
837:
is a bit more active than being a reader, which is passive; this whole matter of clicking on links, typing things in searches, implies usage not just reading.
1741:
4827:
Marketers use nationalism as a tool to appeal to consumers, or de-emphasize it when it's not helpful. Do these corporations and products have a nationality?
2182:
4049:
representing their country in international competition, then all sporting bodies that recognise WADA will have to enforce this. The FIA is one such body.
3484:, which should be the country they officially represent. I note that in the lengthy discussion below, the nominator has only ever used primary sources and
1812:
4332:
both to each individual series (defining series that are exclusively national and those that are international) and the national identity of each driver.
5684:
3166:
marginal cases rather than liberally. They may be dumb, but you can't make them change their minds, so don't worry about it too much. It's just business.
2519:
Yes, only when formally representing that country, in lists. The rule says it clearly like ten times over, and it's sensible IMO. According to the rule
4490:
And why shouldn’t Raonic and Clijsters get a flag? Both of them have actually represented their countries at the olympics and competitions such as the
1338:
as the base infobox. we can reduce redundant information by moving all of the common stuff (name, birth, nationality, death, ...) to the top by using
5013:. Show me verifiable evidence and I will happily accept motorsports along with those other topics. My opinion can easily be changed. Cite evidence. --
5009:
Flags on World Cup or Olympics articles don't bother me because they're supported by verifiable evidence that meets the standard at MOS:FLAG. It says
2700:
in the context of racing they are mostly not doing so, and that the guideline already says this, hence a "yes, follow the darn guideline as written".
2285:
1325:
1210:
126:
941:
4928:. The only reason he was there was for commercial reasons as they wanted to promote the sport in countries like his. And there are also cases like
87:
1228:
Okay. That's why I check before making changes, and why feedback to a question, not matter how inane the question might seems, is always useful.
1995:
I've removed the current year from the heading and added the word "career", for consistency with the F1, Le Mans, NASCAR and IndyCar infoboxes.
1436:
closed as merge. I was trying to figure out how to merge it, and realized that the easiest thing to do would be to change it to something like
5556:
274:? And BTW, I oppose inclusion of parents and children. I agree with inclusion of birth and death dates. I am undecided on inclusion of spouse.
3710:
One flag in a large infobox does not create undue emphasis. And this isn’t an issue. Flags are included for informative and technical reasons.
1555:
template3 = {{Infobox Le Mans driver|embed=yes | Image = | Years = ]–], ], ], ]–] | Team(s) = ], ], ] etc }} }}
5679:
5573:
We already have a pretty easy solution to this, and that's to make the year/years be a part of each element, instead of a pair of lists. See
2483:
1951:
I think it is unhelpful for this template to automatically prepend the current year to the current series heading, for a couple of reasons:
3692:
3506:
3207:
2709:
2668:
1294:
The Achievements parameter in the second example appears to not be used. I am not sure if the code is wrong or the parameter was removed.--
5459:'s infobox align correctly on my desktop computer), I agree that we need a better solution that works on all platforms/browsers. As I did
152:
4755:--- to which countries will get to be in the world cup, represented by that country's one and only team. The FIA does not work like that.
4387:
2020:
How about to add the FIA Driver Category to categorised drivers, for example: Jeroen Bleekemolen, FIA Driver Category: Platinum (2017).
5376:
I don't see any hope of dealing with you in good faith. Pyrope and Tvx1 threw themselves passionately into the opinion that drivers are
1697:(which includes at least 500 F1 drivers) - that seems like a lot of work to me for not much benefit. Where articles currently have both
1202:
403:
Does it really matter? This is navel gazing for Wiki Editors, and will have no effect on how Joe/Jane Public will use the encyclopedia.
78:
58:
2606:
1444:
1109:
1094:
3839:
2574:
1764:
1299:
392:
4740:
2430:
5455:
Whilst noting that how the contents of the infobox display depends upon the platform/browser being used (for example, the rows in
3456:
I think this RFC should be withdrawn. It's based on a flawed understanding of the subject by the initiator. The insinuation that
1594:
1052:
5570:, but that would break if the user only has it show on one line, and other things could be split if the window is small enough.
4866:
representing their nation. But I concede, grudingly as I don't agree with the policy, that they are not official representives.
4745:
The general process is the country's Olympic committee chooses who is the best at their sport. They identify athletes that win.
1133:
5155:
military and national sports teams are covered. This is a very good example of the disingenuous behaviour I have noted above.
33:
4029:
That wouldn't only apply to FIM, right? Every sport that honors the ban on Russia is now a national-team sport? So basically
4019:
3829:
2564:
1931:, a discussion which may also affect this template. Your comments on the matter are appreciated. The discussion can be found
1701:
1691:
1681:
1642:
1536:
1522:
1408:
1391:
1342:
1332:
193:
5294:
That's extremely dishonest. I quoted the MOS in the RfC question, and these editors repeatedly doubled down, insisting that
4847:. We need a secondary source, not a Knowledge (XXG) editor's opinions, to tell us what it means. Cite that secondary source.
4464:
More handwaving. You don't actually know, but you want everyone go just go along. Did you even look at any tennis articles?
5426:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
5151:
That citation has been provided. The MoS guide phrasing indicates 'including but not exclusively', it does not state that
4309:
Russia but if they obey their weird protocol it's OK. Doesn't mean anything, I guess. Doesn't sound like Mazepin has been
2279:
3551:
already applied the guideline with that wording. I, therefore, reiterate my suggestion that this RFC should be withdrawn.
1634:
Having given it some further thought, I think the best approach is to amend the individual series templates so that they
4748:
2895:
not match the rationales you have provided. On a side note it must admit that BristolTreeHouse and Sea Ane's wording of
2270:
2197:
1932:
1915:
1437:
1295:
1237:
1182:
1149:
1064:
1033:
973:
922:
863:
786:
733:
683:
350:
283:
5607:
This would also add more options for these previous series, such as showing their finishing positions in those series.
4822:
4204:
3997:
2155:
1206:
471:
4689:
can ride for Honda then Yamaha then Ducati, yet he always rides for "Team Italy" because he has an Italian passport?
3675:
5350:
5194:
5130:
4993:
4939:
4889:
4727:
4505:
3974:
3903:
3802:
3717:
3558:
3468:
3217:
2986:
2944:
2906:
2831:
2772:
2726:
2685:
4672:
4355:
Even if it was so, that would only apply to FIA, not to all racing drivers which is what this template is for. --
2336:
2224:
2133:
1831:
5407:
5304:
5230:
5142:
5018:
4964:
4855:
4786:
4709:
4626:
4559:
4523:
4481:
4434:
4397:
4360:
4231:
International motorsport is organised very much like the IOC or FIFA. So why would it not comply with SPORTFLAG?
4222:
4142:
4102:
4071:
4038:
3864:
3735:
2814:
2593:
2495:
2464:
1677:
If we remove the name/birth_date/death_date fields from the single-series templates, then that obliges us to add
189:
1201:
Musical artist uses color coding to differentiate between different types of performers, not alive/dead status.
4640:
3688:
3501:
2705:
2664:
2273:
1956:
3730:
You've spent the last four days heaping scorn on me because I said drivers aren't official representatives. --
3382:
the closer about the voters being maybe confused, but while you're there you can make this ask also I suppose.
39:
2784:. If the driver is formally representing their country a flag should be there. The rule is clear about that.
2695:
really the crux of the matter. An example where individuals represent a country in a meaningful way would be
904:
I realize now that there seems no particularly ideal article for such a link - I made an article request for
5529:
4610:(Firstly, I only have the use of one hand presently (slooooow) and didn't know about this, haven't read it.)
4217:
can't be applied to any sports. We need to decide if we're going to apply the guideline or get rid of it. --
4023:
1925:
1584:
1363:
I'm in two minds about the idea, and will give it further consideration. A couple of points to note though:
1281:
317:. Lots of motorsports participants are notable in their field, but don't get great mainstream coverage; see
244:
138:
2045:
4951:
If I've claimed any falsehoods, why don't you simply provide evidence of that? You have the nerve to cite
4033:
doesn't apply to sports at all? Every athlete gets a flag now. Help me out here because I don't follow. --
3993:
2610:
2263:
1397:, then the column widths for all the series will be the same (which may or may not be a good thing) - see
1276:. Could someone who understands the aims of that edit please restore the microformat mark-up? Thank you.
1169:
1129:
1113:
1098:
952:
890:
821:
764:
711:
651:
621:
584:
543:
526:
485:
444:
219:
4771:
driver, but mostly that you have proven your age, name, given them a photo and attended a driving school.
4751:
relies on continental and national clubs to select teams by competing in brackets to narrow them down --
2097:
2063:
905:
5525:
5212:
4818:
4662:
I'd like to see evidence that there is such a thing as a UK national team or Bulgarian national team in
4321:
3776:
3635:
3587:
3428:
3197:
2883:
2802:
2768:
2755:
2528:
2514:
1986:
388:
86:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
5389:
3679:
2875:
2456:
4022:
makes a ruling that some Russian drivers can race as long as they don't have any Russian flags around.
5468:
5445:
5403:
5300:
5226:
5138:
5014:
4960:
4851:
4782:
4705:
4622:
4555:
4519:
4477:
4430:
4393:
4356:
4218:
4138:
4098:
4067:
4034:
3877:
3860:
3731:
3579:
2810:
2589:
2491:
2460:
2053:
2000:
1971:
1904:
1794:
1716:
1653:
1570:
1491:
1423:
4844:
2678:
happen as part of a "national team". People can easily represent their nations individually as well.
643:
rationalisation of all the driver infobox templates, because that would just be counter-productive.
307:
specific policy against exact birth dates being included at all for those of "borderline notability"
5574:
5559:, that was taking up 2 lines instead of one, causing problems for the years being shifted up/down.
5508:
4618:
3684:
3599:
3583:
3489:
3374:
the closer to consider: "Please count heads of project members/contributors, you will see that the
2701:
2660:
2479:
2406:
2310:
2163:
2105:
1921:
This message is to notify you that there is an RfC ongoing on whether to add pronunciation info to
1477:
148:
4978:
4952:
4915:
4850:
Somebody. Please cite a source. If you can't, admit you're just arguing your personal opinions. --
4444:
4313:
Russia or won a competition in Russia and won the right to represent Russia in some competitions.
1830:
really wide boxes. another advantage of using years1/title1, years2/title2, ... is that is fixes
5654:
5624:
5610:
5478:
4926:
a swimmer compete at the Olympics without ever having set foot in an Olympic swimming pool before
2382:
2034:
1872:
1840:
1820:
1775:
1749:
1668:
1605:
1466:
1404:
Even if the consensus ends up towards embedding and we end up moving all the "common stuff" into
1353:
1277:
1218:
910:
314:
240:
134:
5330:
4920:
3859:, saying for motorsports in general, it doesn't matter what race or series, riders get flags. --
3792:
3548:
3457:
2972:
2560:(RfC initiator) I haven't heard any workable arguments to allow flags in general templates like
1324:
what I have in mind is that we consider (1) adding the ability to embed to all the infoboxes in
1137:
1770:, which is less flexible in terms of series ordering, but effectively achieves the same thing.
5544:
lines instead of just one, breaking the link between year and series. I propose utilizing the
3885:
3849:
3814:
3520:- I have just reverted an undiscussed change in the guideline which is quoted in the question.
2789:
1108:
It's OK now. I figured out that IE does not like CSS shortcuts if the colour is placed first.
947:
885:
816:
759:
706:
646:
616:
579:
538:
521:
480:
439:
310:
214:
5207:
on principle. I have done this on principle even when I agree with the change on the merits.
3337:
Whoever wins the RfC, write it down somewhere and point to the permalink for this discussion.
2631:
If a driver represents a nation the flag should be there, if not it shouldn't (you'll notice
1205:, probably the most widespread infobox uses blue for everyone. Other common sports templates
5662:
5658:
5648:
5632:
5628:
5618:
5614:
5533:
5512:
5486:
5482:
5472:
5449:
5411:
5354:
5324:
5308:
5289:
5234:
5216:
5208:
5198:
5182:
5166:
5161:
5146:
5117:
5112:
5100:
5095:
5022:
4997:
4968:
4943:
4925:
4908:
4893:
4876:
4859:
4811:
4790:
4731:
4713:
4657:
4630:
4580:
4575:
4563:
4544:
4539:
4527:
4509:
4485:
4459:
4454:
4438:
4419:
4414:
4401:
4382:
4377:
4364:
4343:
4338:
4325:
4317:
4264:
4242:
4237:
4226:
4208:
4163:
4158:
4146:
4131:
4126:
4106:
4092:
4087:
4075:
4060:
4055:
4042:
4007:
4001:
3978:
3952:
3907:
3891:
3868:
3820:
3806:
3780:
3772:
3739:
3721:
3696:
3639:
3631:
3625:
3571:
3562:
3530:
3512:
3481:
3472:
3432:
3424:
3221:
3201:
3193:
3023:
3007:
3002:
2990:
2965:
2960:
2948:
2932:
2927:
2910:
2867:
2862:
2855:
2835:
2818:
2793:
2776:
2759:
2751:
2730:
2713:
2689:
2672:
2646:
2614:
2597:
2552:
2547:
2532:
2524:
2510:
2499:
2468:
2410:
2386:
2314:
2291:
2202:
2191:
2167:
2109:
2084:
2076:
2057:
2038:
2004:
1990:
1982:
1975:
1941:
1908:
1876:
1844:
1824:
1798:
1779:
1753:
1720:
1672:
1657:
1609:
1574:
1497:
1470:
1427:
1357:
1303:
1284:
1250:
1244:
1222:
1195:
1189:
1162:
1156:
1117:
1102:
1077:
1071:
1046:
1040:
1019:
1015:
986:
980:
959:
935:
929:
897:
876:
870:
834:
828:
799:
793:
771:
746:
740:
718:
696:
690:
658:
637:
628:
607:
591:
570:
550:
501:
492:
461:
451:
430:
407:
397:
382:
363:
357:
335:
296:
290:
264:
247:
226:
180:
161:
141:
5204:
4983:
4956:
4693:
alternately showed you "official" results on your TV screen a US flag or a Texas flag for
4676:
4289:
racers were representing a country. But it was 2005-2009 and it was "unique". So teams...
3767:
the closer will come in neutral and read and cogitate on the arguments. And also headcount
1687:
to all the articles which currently have one of the single-series templates but don't have
1401:
for an example where the column widths in his F1 and Le Mans infoboxes are quite different.
306:
271:
255:
5577:
for an example of this with both modes. The first "Previous series" section is the normal
5497:
5464:
5441:
4929:
4743:
4686:
4200:
3812:
What exactly is the change you are suggesting? Could you give us an example? Best Wishes,
2049:
1996:
1967:
1900:
1790:
1712:
1649:
1566:
1486:
1419:
1374:
1328:, (2) merge multiple boxes into one box as I have done in the Andy Priaulx example, using
810:
806:
3663:
if the members mostly don't want to use it, since by tradition and practice projects are
3485:
3301:
3295:
other Knowledge (XXG) articles, and fine, whatever. So the motorsports project does not
2024:
847:
in clarifiying the field, and is probably the best way to disambiguate it at this point.
5644:
5555:
As a quick example, I was looking at the Doriane Pin page, and she has one series, the
5545:
5504:
5456:
5436:
5347:
5320:
5285:
5203:
What? No rule should ever be changed (significantly) without discussion. Roll back per
5191:
5178:
5127:
4990:
4936:
4904:
4886:
4872:
4807:
4724:
4653:
4502:
4260:
3971:
3961:
3948:
3900:
3799:
3714:
3621:
3555:
3526:
3465:
3214:
3019:
2983:
2941:
2903:
2828:
2723:
2682:
2655:
If this is to make more explicit the existing consensus regarding usage of flags, then
2642:
2632:
2581:
2520:
2402:
2306:
2159:
2101:
1454:
5604:. See a the conversation two topics above for other users running into this problem.
5003:
laughed off of Knowledge (XXG) when they try the same old pushy bragging and bluffing?
1835:
not a problem with just your example, but one that exists in most of these templates.
1514:
To clarify, with the exception of a few common fields, what's being proposed is not a
1262:
5673:
4694:
4515:
4473:
4469:
4443:
Tennis has some different rules I think, although I'm not an expert. Perhaps talk to
4425:
4117:
3936:
3918:
3856:
2378:
2257:
2030:
1936:
1868:
1836:
1816:
1815:
of my template. All fields are optional, so it adapts to most forms of motorsport. --
1771:
1745:
1664:
1601:
1462:
1349:
1214:
567:
498:
458:
427:
318:
341:
In light of all that explanation, the "spouse" field should not be included either.
199:
An F1-specific template to cover its unique details, for current and retired drivers
5396:
4635:
As I said above, there is consensus that using flags in some motorsports do follow
4465:
4213:
Yes. If any and all motorsport is the same as the Olympics and the World Cup, then
3925:
3591:
2887:
2798:
2785:
2696:
1398:
1381:
851:
332:
322:
261:
173:
158:
4772:
5156:
5107:
5090:
4570:
4534:
4449:
4409:
4372:
4333:
4293:
4232:
4153:
4121:
4113:
4082:
4050:
4015:
3609:
3595:
3575:
2997:
2955:
2922:
2871:
2848:
2542:
2186:
2093:
2067:
1380:
ped}} - for most drivers, the infoboxes are (deliberately) the same width - see
1269:
1231:
1176:
1143:
1058:
1027:
1011:
967:
916:
857:
780:
727:
677:
634:
604:
518:
series, for which you need to follow the pro-forma guides in the documentation.
404:
344:
277:
177:
70:
52:
5402:. If there are unresolved questions they'll have to be dealt with elsewhere. --
2271:
Template talk:Infobox writer § Template-protected edit request on 29 April 2019
833:
Yes, a user is the same as a "reader"; I prefer the term user because being an
4192:
2605:, I see no reason why motorsports should be an exception to the general rule.
2358:
83:
5225:
rather than admit they can't support their opinions with verifiable facts. --
4621:. Bloody silly (of course, I've known about it for years). Got to fly, now.--
3750:
I will be sorely disappointed if the closer says "Well, you guys must follow
2154:
Please add a field "Racing licence" under a "xx series" field - just like in
5640:
5539:
Edit request: Update/secondary {{{prev series}}}, {{{titles}}}, {{{awards}}}
5344:
5339:
5334:
5316:
5281:
5188:
5174:
5124:
4987:
4933:
4900:
4883:
4868:
4803:
4758:
To race in F1, first you need a license from a national auto club. That's a
4721:
4649:
4499:
4491:
4256:
3968:
3944:
3897:
3796:
3711:
3617:
3552:
3522:
3462:
3211:
3015:
2980:
2976:
2938:
2918:
2900:
2879:
2825:
2720:
2679:
2638:
423:
3855:
for nationality. Various editors have insisted on this, regardless of what
1760:
maintaining distinct templates. another example is what has been done for
4296:
uses the term "team" a lot but it is not clear that they are referring to
4700:
4636:
4551:
4214:
4030:
3763:
3755:
3751:
3668:
3658:
3652:
2585:
2475:
2448:
1600:
can be embedded in that template to add additional military information.
5338:
warning, that change to a site-wide guideline was utterly unacceptable.
4254:
says that flags are acceptable in Formula One articles for this reason.
2181:
please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see
913:
competently and discuss it with others but not actually write articles.
4495:
3762:. I would hope that that close would be more like "Well, putting aside
1481:
1024:
Even shorter would be "best series finish", maybe, in terms of width.
633:
There is no template. I've been using the Infobox Biography template.
4690:
4408:
drivers' representative nationalities why would they have the rules?
2588:
at all, it should apply to motorsport the same as any other topic. --
2488:"where the subject officially represents that country or nationality"
3615:
message at the IPs user page, as they cannot be reached with ping).
3261:
it. Mabye caps to get her attention. I have done this several times.
4305:
formally representing their country. It just means they don't like
2486:, consistent with any other topic, generally only using flag icons
188:
A general template for current and retired racing drivers, such as
2580:
that wouldn't apply equally well to any and all sports, rendering
1565:
Frietjes, please advise if I have mischaracterised your proposal.
1266:
1370:
is because "Autosport British Competition Driver of the Year" is
514:
not be, given that they were one and the same until a decade ago?
4834:
It's important to notice that they make arguments that apply to
5314:
arguing for something that is outside of the scope of this RfC.
3791:
Not sure what you are trying to achieve here. As far as I know
703:
formatting issues anyway, so I am likely to spot any mistakes.
3054:
I guess car racing is a complicated middle ground. But still,
2324:
2212:
2121:
1955:
it doesn't cater for seasons which span year boundaries, e.g.
155:, for example), then it's not quite compatible with rallying.
15:
4276:
Summoned by bot. It's not super clear to me when a person is
202:
A WRC template for the informational requirements of rallying
5431:{{{prev series years}}} and {{{prev series}}} cannot line up
3423:
on the scale as well as headcount and strength of argument.
1366:
The only reason the infoboxes were different widths in the
5370:
SSSB, I'm arguing the literal question asked in the RfC:
4554:
doesn't apply to sports. I don't need to do any more. --
3630:
Alright. I hear you. I will change my vote to "no vote".
1532:
instances of the existing single-series templates within
1093:
being picked up by IE. Can anyone look into this please?
205:
A complete NASCAR infobox (again, for its specific needs)
4550:
you're from, gets a flag. Which is tantamount to saying
3461:
overly strict interpretation of official representation.
3206:
Firstly, I'm not losing anything, because this is not a
1981:
Your suggestion makes more sense than current protocol.
535:
Striking part of my comment, which was a bit too harsh.
5222:
4959:
and accuse me of falsehoods? OK. Cite that. Show us. --
4006:
So a general ban on Russian competitors was issued for
3542:
2806:
2452:
1367:
1318:
1314:
1273:
270:
Curious, why would it "cause issues" with enforcers of
5503:
template with the longest name, so it wouldn't break.
3957:
In all honesty I think we should convert to the newer
2422:
RfC on making an exception to MOS:FLAG for motorsports
426:
for how I tried to deal with it as best as possible. -
129:. I suggest these be merged, into this one (note also
2767:, But only when formally representing their country.
380:
Shouldn't this be Template:Infobox Racing driver? --
309:. And not every article is someone of the stature of
2429:
The following discussion is an archived record of a
82:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
5623:I have put an idea in the /testcase for this page.
5601:
5597:
5593:
5586:
5585:rendering, while the one below is a test using the
5582:
5578:
5567:
5563:
5549:
4392:
It does not say drivers represent their nations. --
2809:(without edit summary, editor new December 2020).--
2439:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1711:infoboxes, I remove it from all but the top one).
613:How is it done currently, and with what template?
125:There are are a range of "...driver" infoboxes in
4081:to look into and raise at the appropriate place.
3417:Our main goal here should be maximum gruntlement
2209:Template-protected edit request on 29 April 2019
4010:, relating to the 2014 Olympics. This includes
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
4116:(who has competed at international level) and
2899:representing is much more suitable in general.
3825:For example, currently the documentation for
3754:". It's not a matter of policy-based points,
2442:A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
1518:of the existing single-series templates into
8:
4914:are the one advocating a change here so the
1387:If the series infoboxes are embedded within
3480:Go with the nation assigned to a driver by
1432:the main reason why this came up is due to
47:
4476:is meaningless. Everybody gets a flag. --
2269:I also have an identical edit request at
1891:Proposed change to previous series fields
1368:"old version" of the Andy Priaulx article
1326:Category:Racecar driver infobox templates
1211:Template:Infobox Gridiron football person
5333:, based themselves on when all applying
4821:is an official representative of China.
4681:You do need to cite that the sky is blue
2264:already been carried out for the sandbox
805:fans, why would they want to know about
5562:The solution I saw noted was to add an
2373:| label13 = Car {{abbr|No.|number}}
2254:on this template should be replaced by
1959:(the infobox displays "2015 Formula E")
153:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Formula One
49:
5557:Formula 4 South East Asia Championship
5548:template, as is already set up in the
5371:
3942:substitiued and without the wikilink.
3056:we have to decide one way or the other
1055:was the result of a prior suggestion.
131:discussion with WikiProject Motorsport
121:Suggested merger of "driver" infoboxes
96:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Motorsport
2246:Template:Tooltip has been deprecated.
2044:I have advertised this discussion at
839:Now, what's to say that your average
76:This template is within the scope of
21:
19:
7:
3665:fully allowed to override guidelines
1866:2010 X Championship < br / : -->
1203:Template:Infobox Football biography
38:It is of interest to the following
5493:Quickest solution would be to use
3370:This is something I think you can
14:
5685:NA-importance motorsport articles
5552:section of the current template.
4930:Michael "Eddie the Eagle" Edwards
4739:According to the Olympic Charter,
4350:FIA's International Sporting Code
3795:already applies that part of MOS.
2917:I appreciate what you are saying
2629:the guideline should be followed.
1232:
1177:
1144:
1059:
1028:
968:
917:
858:
781:
728:
678:
345:
278:
5566:element to the list or an extra
5422:The discussion above is closed.
5277:which is just hypocrisy, because
4645:WT:WikiProject Motorcycle racing
4518:? Does anyone not get a flag? --
3873:At the very least, it should be
2447:This RfC was rendered moot when
2392:
2328:
2297:
2216:
2173:
2125:
1053:List of motorsport championships
944:. It will get a quicker result.
185:What we can and should have is:
127::Category:Motor racing infoboxes
69:
51:
20:
1134:Template:Infobox musical artist
192:, which will eventually become
99:Template:WikiProject Motorsport
4020:Court of Arbitration for Sport
2411:02:54, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
2387:00:48, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
509:know that he was an IRL driver
194:Template:Infobox racing driver
1:
3787:Discussion (motorsport flags)
2975:is already properly applying
1942:17:17, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
987:23:45, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
960:23:34, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
936:23:26, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
898:23:17, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
877:23:00, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
829:22:12, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
800:21:26, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
772:18:32, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
754:There really is no issue here
747:16:30, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
90:and see a list of open tasks.
5680:NA-Class motorsport articles
5534:14:51, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
4749:FIFA World Cup qualification
4348:Citation needed. Is that in
3013:pointed it out to him below.
2203:05:32, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
2168:22:09, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
2110:18:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
2085:18:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
2058:08:55, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
2039:15:56, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
2005:11:39, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
1991:04:26, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
1976:11:02, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
1877:01:35, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
1845:17:34, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
1825:09:41, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
1799:18:58, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
1780:15:34, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
1754:15:26, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
1721:23:09, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
1673:16:47, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
1658:00:47, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
1610:15:30, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
1575:05:13, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
1553:2002 ] Champion<br /: -->
1498:04:39, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
1471:15:19, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
1438:Template:Infobox BTCC record
1428:03:44, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
1358:01:17, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
1124:Silver background means dead
942:WikiProject Motorsport/Tasks
533:17:44, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
5592:By adopting something like
4514:Fine. What is the point of
2517:) 17:37, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2351:to reactivate your request.
2339:has been answered. Set the
2239:to reactivate your request.
2227:has been answered. Set the
2156:Template:Infobox WRC driver
2148:to reactivate your request.
2136:has been answered. Set the
1285:19:03, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
1251:23:17, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
1223:23:11, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
1207:Template:Infobox MLB player
1196:22:22, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
719:10:18, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
697:00:52, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
659:14:56, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
638:13:58, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
629:17:15, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
608:16:58, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
592:21:48, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
571:21:09, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
551:21:48, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
502:17:09, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
493:16:56, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
462:16:39, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
452:09:53, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
431:05:28, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
408:13:21, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
398:22:08, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
364:18:22, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
227:12:10, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
181:13:17, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
5701:
5663:18:15, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
5649:17:42, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
5633:15:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
5619:19:31, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
5596:as an argument similar to
5513:09:26, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
5487:01:18, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
5473:01:29, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
5450:01:04, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
5133:1 02:32, 16 May 2021 (UTC
2357:Just a minor MOS fix, per
2315:19:30, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
2292:15:23, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
1590:it has module fields, and
1434:Infobox V8 Supercar driver
1078:03:52, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
1047:03:28, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
1020:12:22, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
336:17:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
297:16:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
265:16:04, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
162:16:04, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
3924:in infoboxes? Looking at
3488:to back their position. –
2505:Survey (motorsport flags)
2474:Should the guidelines at
2046:the Motosport WikiProject
2013:FIA Driver Categorisation
1445:infobox military conflict
507:Oh, for Christ's sake. I
248:11:10, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
235:Standard biography fields
147:Oppose, specifically for
142:10:45, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
64:
46:
5424:Please do not modify it.
5412:20:45, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
5355:20:32, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
5325:20:28, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
5309:19:56, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
5290:19:16, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
5235:18:12, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
5217:17:34, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
5199:14:07, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
5183:07:34, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
5167:02:43, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
5147:02:37, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
5118:01:56, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
5101:01:35, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
5023:01:08, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
4998:00:38, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
4969:21:13, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
4944:16:14, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
4909:13:02, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
4894:11:56, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
4877:09:58, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
4860:23:18, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
4812:22:40, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
4796:How is this relevant to
4791:22:10, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
4732:20:07, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
4714:18:49, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
4658:11:31, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
4641:Talk:2010 Isle of Man TT
4631:11:22, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
4581:02:30, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
4564:02:16, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
4545:01:09, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
4528:23:45, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
4510:23:37, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
4486:23:12, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
4460:22:57, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
4439:22:49, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
4420:22:38, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
4402:22:24, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
4383:22:06, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
4365:21:43, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
4344:21:09, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
4326:20:31, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
4265:08:03, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
4243:23:01, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
4227:22:53, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
4209:22:39, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
4164:22:41, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
4147:22:31, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
4132:21:58, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
4107:21:43, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
4093:21:18, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
4076:21:14, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
4061:21:03, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
4043:19:30, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
4002:19:10, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
3979:02:40, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
3953:08:00, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
3908:23:28, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
3892:20:07, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
3869:19:40, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
3840:Infobox motorcycle rider
3821:19:04, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
3807:18:28, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
3781:18:01, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
3740:20:04, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
3722:19:41, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
3697:18:48, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
3661:has little standing here
3640:17:32, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
3626:14:21, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
3563:14:07, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
3531:13:46, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
3513:06:50, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
3473:01:19, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
3433:17:29, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
3222:13:05, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
3202:11:20, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
3024:07:24, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
3008:03:37, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2991:03:15, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2966:02:55, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2949:02:38, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2933:01:27, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2911:01:19, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2863:23:53, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
2836:16:20, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
2819:14:28, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
2794:13:46, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
2777:06:42, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
2760:05:24, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
2731:16:39, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2714:15:17, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2690:00:01, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2673:23:45, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
2647:07:55, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
2615:02:28, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
2598:21:45, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
2575:Infobox motorcycle rider
2553:20:56, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
2533:20:31, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
2500:18:20, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
2469:20:58, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2436:Please do not modify it.
1957:2014-15 Formula E season
1909:03:36, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
1867:2011 Y Championship". --
1765:infobox motorcycle rider
1163:21:56, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
1118:17:08, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
1103:13:14, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
5296:official representative
5011:official representative
4823:Mini represents Germany
4112:different treatment of
3930:{{flagicon|CAN}} Canada
3769:of project contributors
2365:| label13 = Car no.
1916:Template:Infobox person
1744:? It's done already. --
1595:infobox military person
1304:14:24, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
1296:The Three Headed Knight
1088:Border shows red in IE6
940:Better to post that at
472:Former Champ Car driver
1811:Gaeaman787, check the
1170:Template:Infobox actor
1130:Template:Infobox actor
511:. I am not stupid, OK?
79:WikiProject Motorsport
4845:it's a primary source
3830:Infobox racing driver
2565:Infobox racing driver
2248:All transclusions of
1702:Infobox racing driver
1692:Infobox racing driver
1682:Infobox racing driver
1643:Infobox racing driver
1537:Infobox racing driver
1528:, but the ability to
1523:Infobox racing driver
1409:Infobox racing driver
1392:Infobox racing driver
1343:infobox racing driver
1333:infobox racing driver
1272:in this template was
598:Pre-F1 racing drivers
190:this work in progress
4533:what your issue is.
4371:done in that sport.
3932:which is effectivly
2807:this example, 15 May
2624:Follow the guideline
1461:matter. thank you.
1282:Talk to Andy Mabbett
1274:removed in this edit
245:Talk to Andy Mabbett
139:Talk to Andy Mabbett
5575:User:Kaictl/sandbox
5461:nearly 10 years ago
5279:you haven't either.
5221:Now these guys are
4619:this infobox please
2431:request for comment
2100:is a problem here.
1947:Current series year
1638:be embedded within
1309:addition of modules
906:Championship racing
149:Template:WRC driver
102:motorsport articles
5223:rewritng the rules
4825:. That's official.
4252:previous consensus
3914:I thought we used
2361:could you change:
2262:. This change has
1257:Broken microformat
315:Michael Schumacher
196:or its replacement
34:content assessment
5594:prev series table
5583:prev series years
5392:I'm removing the
4611:
3994:HumanBodyPiloter5
3676:WP:LOCALCONSENSUS
3482:secondary sources
2355:
2354:
2243:
2242:
2201:
2152:
2151:
1248:
1193:
1160:
1075:
1044:
984:
964:Thanks. Will do.
933:
874:
797:
744:
694:
553:
396:
361:
301:I'm not saying I
294:
118:
117:
114:
113:
110:
109:
5692:
5603:
5599:
5595:
5588:
5584:
5580:
5569:
5565:
5551:
5502:
5496:
5401:
5395:
5164:
5159:
5115:
5110:
5098:
5093:
4753:by winning games
4673:WP:Verifiability
4609:
4578:
4573:
4542:
4537:
4472:? You're saying
4457:
4452:
4417:
4412:
4380:
4375:
4341:
4336:
4240:
4235:
4161:
4156:
4129:
4124:
4090:
4085:
4058:
4053:
3966:
3960:
3941:
3935:
3931:
3923:
3917:
3896:No it shouldn’t.
3888:
3882:
3876:
3854:
3848:
3844:
3838:
3834:
3828:
3817:
3614:
3608:
3603:
3588:BristolTreeHouse
3545:
3509:
3504:
3005:
3000:
2963:
2958:
2930:
2925:
2884:BristolTreeHouse
2860:
2853:
2803:BristolTreeHouse
2769:BristolTreeHouse
2652:Unclear question
2579:
2573:
2569:
2563:
2550:
2545:
2438:
2396:
2395:
2374:
2366:
2346:
2342:
2332:
2331:
2325:
2301:
2300:
2288:
2282:
2276:
2261:
2253:
2252:
2234:
2230:
2220:
2219:
2213:
2189:
2177:
2176:
2143:
2139:
2129:
2128:
2122:
2081:
2073:
1939:
1930:
1924:
1832:wp:accessibility
1769:
1763:
1706:
1700:
1696:
1690:
1686:
1680:
1647:
1641:
1599:
1593:
1589:
1583:
1541:
1535:
1527:
1521:
1494:
1489:
1459:
1453:
1449:
1443:
1413:
1407:
1396:
1390:
1379:
1373:
1347:
1341:
1337:
1331:
1290:Unused parameter
1242:
1240:
1234:
1187:
1185:
1179:
1154:
1152:
1146:
1069:
1067:
1061:
1038:
1036:
1030:
978:
976:
970:
955:
950:
927:
925:
919:
893:
888:
868:
866:
860:
824:
819:
791:
789:
783:
767:
762:
738:
736:
730:
714:
709:
688:
686:
680:
654:
649:
624:
619:
587:
582:
546:
541:
534:
529:
524:
488:
483:
476:
470:
447:
442:
417:Deceased drivers
386:
355:
353:
347:
288:
286:
280:
222:
217:
104:
103:
100:
97:
94:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
25:
24:
23:
16:
5700:
5699:
5695:
5694:
5693:
5691:
5690:
5689:
5670:
5669:
5541:
5521:
5500:
5494:
5433:
5428:
5427:
5404:Dennis Bratland
5399:
5393:
5301:Dennis Bratland
5227:Dennis Bratland
5162:
5157:
5139:Dennis Bratland
5113:
5108:
5096:
5091:
5015:Dennis Bratland
4961:Dennis Bratland
4852:Dennis Bratland
4783:Dennis Bratland
4706:Dennis Bratland
4687:Valentino Rossi
4623:Rocknrollmancer
4576:
4571:
4556:Dennis Bratland
4540:
4535:
4520:Dennis Bratland
4478:Dennis Bratland
4455:
4450:
4431:Dennis Bratland
4415:
4410:
4394:Dennis Bratland
4378:
4373:
4357:Dennis Bratland
4339:
4334:
4238:
4233:
4219:Dennis Bratland
4196:
4159:
4154:
4139:Dennis Bratland
4127:
4122:
4099:Dennis Bratland
4088:
4083:
4068:Dennis Bratland
4056:
4051:
4035:Dennis Bratland
4018:. But then the
3964:
3958:
3939:
3933:
3929:
3921:
3915:
3886:
3883:. Best Wishes,
3880:
3874:
3861:Dennis Bratland
3852:
3846:
3842:
3836:
3832:
3826:
3815:
3789:
3732:Dennis Bratland
3612:
3606:
3580:Dennis Bratland
3569:
3541:
3507:
3502:
3376:project members
3003:
2998:
2961:
2956:
2928:
2923:
2856:
2849:
2811:Rocknrollmancer
2590:Dennis Bratland
2577:
2571:
2567:
2561:
2548:
2543:
2507:
2492:Dennis Bratland
2471:
2461:Dennis Bratland
2434:
2424:
2419:
2393:
2372:
2364:
2344:
2340:
2329:
2323:
2298:
2286:
2280:
2274:
2255:
2250:
2249:
2232:
2228:
2217:
2211:
2174:
2141:
2137:
2126:
2120:
2077:
2072:
2068:
2015:
1949:
1937:
1928:
1922:
1919:
1893:
1767:
1761:
1704:
1698:
1694:
1688:
1684:
1678:
1645:
1639:
1597:
1591:
1587:
1581:
1556:
1539:
1533:
1525:
1519:
1492:
1487:
1457:
1451:
1447:
1441:
1411:
1405:
1394:
1388:
1377:
1371:
1345:
1339:
1335:
1329:
1311:
1292:
1259:
1238:
1183:
1150:
1126:
1090:
1065:
1034:
974:
953:
948:
923:
891:
886:
882:may be linked.
864:
822:
817:
811:Sebastian Buemi
807:Ricardo Risatti
787:
765:
760:
734:
712:
707:
684:
671:
669:Ambiguous field
652:
647:
622:
617:
600:
585:
580:
544:
539:
527:
522:
486:
481:
474:
468:
445:
440:
419:
378:
351:
311:SĂ©bastien Loeb
284:
237:
220:
215:
123:
101:
98:
95:
92:
91:
12:
11:
5:
5698:
5696:
5688:
5687:
5682:
5672:
5671:
5668:
5667:
5666:
5665:
5598:medaltemplates
5587:medaltemplates
5550:medaltemplates
5540:
5537:
5520:
5517:
5516:
5515:
5491:
5490:
5489:
5457:Jamie Chadwick
5437:Jamie Chadwick
5432:
5429:
5421:
5420:
5419:
5418:
5417:
5416:
5415:
5362:
5360:
5359:
5358:
5357:
5327:
5315:
5280:
5274:
5273:
5272:
5271:
5270:
5269:
5268:
5267:
5266:
5265:
5264:
5263:
5262:
5261:
5260:
5259:
5258:
5257:
5256:
5255:
5254:
5253:
5252:
5251:
5250:
5249:
5248:
5247:
5246:
5245:
5244:
5243:
5242:
5241:
5240:
5239:
5238:
5237:
5185:
5173:
5169:
5120:
5103:
5053:
5052:
5051:
5050:
5049:
5048:
5047:
5046:
5045:
5044:
5043:
5042:
5041:
5040:
5039:
5038:
5037:
5036:
5035:
5034:
5033:
5032:
5031:
5030:
5029:
5028:
5027:
5026:
4899:
4867:
4802:
4648:
4608:
4607:
4606:
4605:
4604:
4603:
4602:
4601:
4600:
4599:
4598:
4597:
4596:
4595:
4594:
4593:
4592:
4591:
4590:
4589:
4588:
4587:
4586:
4585:
4584:
4583:
4274:
4273:
4272:
4271:
4270:
4269:
4268:
4267:
4255:
4246:
4245:
4194:
4190:
4183:
4182:
4181:
4180:
4179:
4178:
4177:
4176:
4175:
4174:
4173:
4172:
4171:
4170:
4169:
4168:
4167:
4166:
3989:
3988:
3987:
3986:
3985:
3984:
3983:
3982:
3981:
3943:
3911:
3910:
3788:
3785:
3784:
3783:
3748:
3747:
3746:
3745:
3744:
3743:
3742:
3725:
3724:
3702:
3701:
3700:
3699:
3685:RandomCanadian
3647:
3646:
3645:
3644:
3643:
3642:
3616:
3600:LaundryPizza03
3584:RandomCanadian
3566:
3565:
3543:six months ago
3534:
3533:
3521:
3515:
3475:
3450:
3449:
3448:
3447:
3446:
3445:
3444:
3443:
3442:
3441:
3440:
3439:
3438:
3437:
3436:
3435:
3398:
3397:
3396:
3395:
3394:
3393:
3392:
3391:
3390:
3389:
3388:
3387:
3386:
3385:
3384:
3383:
3353:
3352:
3351:
3350:
3349:
3348:
3347:
3346:
3345:
3344:
3343:
3342:
3341:
3340:
3339:
3338:
3320:
3319:
3318:
3317:
3316:
3315:
3314:
3313:
3312:
3311:
3310:
3309:
3308:
3307:
3306:
3305:
3277:
3276:
3275:
3274:
3273:
3272:
3271:
3270:
3269:
3268:
3267:
3266:
3265:
3264:
3263:
3262:
3243:
3242:
3241:
3240:
3239:
3238:
3237:
3236:
3235:
3234:
3233:
3232:
3231:
3230:
3229:
3228:
3178:
3177:
3176:
3175:
3174:
3173:
3172:
3171:
3170:
3169:
3168:
3167:
3152:
3151:
3150:
3149:
3148:
3147:
3146:
3145:
3144:
3143:
3142:
3141:
3126:
3125:
3124:
3123:
3122:
3121:
3120:
3119:
3118:
3117:
3116:
3115:
3096:
3095:
3094:
3093:
3092:
3091:
3090:
3089:
3088:
3087:
3086:
3085:
3070:
3069:
3068:
3067:
3066:
3065:
3064:
3063:
3062:
3061:
3060:
3059:
3041:
3040:
3039:
3038:
3037:
3036:
3035:
3034:
3033:
3032:
3031:
3030:
3014:
3010:
2914:
2913:
2865:
2842:
2841:
2840:
2839:
2838:
2779:
2762:
2745:
2744:
2743:
2742:
2741:
2740:
2739:
2738:
2737:
2702:RandomCanadian
2661:RandomCanadian
2649:
2637:
2633:Nikita Mazepin
2617:
2600:
2582:MOS:SPORTFLAGS
2555:
2536:
2521:MOS:SPORTFLAGS
2506:
2503:
2478:be applied to
2472:
2446:
2445:
2444:
2425:
2423:
2420:
2418:
2415:
2414:
2413:
2353:
2352:
2333:
2322:
2319:
2318:
2317:
2241:
2240:
2221:
2210:
2207:
2206:
2205:
2150:
2149:
2130:
2119:
2116:
2115:
2114:
2113:
2112:
2088:
2087:
2070:
2060:
2014:
2011:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2007:
1964:
1963:
1960:
1948:
1945:
1926:Infobox person
1918:
1912:
1897:the discussion
1892:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1882:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1847:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1801:
1783:
1782:
1738:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1585:infobox person
1551:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1402:
1385:
1384:as an example.
1310:
1307:
1291:
1288:
1258:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1199:
1198:
1125:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1089:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
996:
995:
994:
993:
992:
991:
990:
989:
903:
854:inclinations?
848:
845:
838:
670:
667:
666:
665:
664:
663:
662:
661:
599:
596:
595:
594:
561:
560:
559:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
515:
495:
418:
415:
413:
411:
410:
377:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
326:
236:
233:
232:
231:
230:
229:
208:
207:
206:
203:
200:
197:
166:
165:
122:
119:
116:
115:
112:
111:
108:
107:
105:
88:the discussion
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
5697:
5686:
5683:
5681:
5678:
5677:
5675:
5664:
5660:
5656:
5652:
5651:
5650:
5646:
5642:
5637:
5636:
5635:
5634:
5630:
5626:
5621:
5620:
5616:
5612:
5608:
5605:
5590:
5576:
5571:
5560:
5558:
5553:
5547:
5538:
5536:
5535:
5531:
5527:
5526:RibenaDrinker
5518:
5514:
5510:
5506:
5499:
5492:
5488:
5484:
5480:
5476:
5475:
5474:
5470:
5466:
5462:
5458:
5454:
5453:
5452:
5451:
5447:
5443:
5438:
5430:
5425:
5414:
5413:
5409:
5405:
5398:
5391:
5386:
5382:
5379:
5374:
5373:nationality"?
5369:
5368:
5367:
5366:
5365:
5364:
5363:
5356:
5352:
5349:
5346:
5343:topic-banned.
5341:
5336:
5332:
5328:
5326:
5322:
5318:
5312:
5311:
5310:
5306:
5302:
5299:hypocrite. --
5297:
5293:
5292:
5291:
5287:
5283:
5278:
5236:
5232:
5228:
5224:
5220:
5219:
5218:
5214:
5210:
5206:
5202:
5201:
5200:
5196:
5193:
5190:
5186:
5184:
5180:
5176:
5170:
5168:
5165:
5160:
5154:
5150:
5149:
5148:
5144:
5140:
5135:
5134:
5132:
5129:
5126:
5121:
5119:
5116:
5111:
5104:
5102:
5099:
5094:
5088:
5083:
5082:
5081:
5080:
5079:
5078:
5077:
5076:
5075:
5074:
5073:
5072:
5071:
5070:
5069:
5068:
5067:
5066:
5065:
5064:
5063:
5062:
5061:
5060:
5059:
5058:
5057:
5056:
5055:
5054:
5025:
5024:
5020:
5016:
5012:
5007:
5001:
5000:
4999:
4995:
4992:
4989:
4985:
4980:
4975:
4974:
4973:
4972:
4971:
4970:
4966:
4962:
4958:
4954:
4947:
4946:
4945:
4941:
4938:
4935:
4931:
4927:
4922:
4917:
4912:
4911:
4910:
4906:
4902:
4897:
4896:
4895:
4891:
4888:
4885:
4880:
4879:
4878:
4874:
4870:
4864:
4863:
4862:
4861:
4857:
4853:
4848:
4846:
4840:
4837:
4832:
4828:
4824:
4820:
4815:
4814:
4813:
4809:
4805:
4799:
4795:
4794:
4793:
4792:
4788:
4784:
4778:
4774:
4773:
4770:
4766:
4761:
4756:
4754:
4750:
4746:
4744:
4741:
4735:
4734:
4733:
4729:
4726:
4723:
4718:
4717:
4716:
4715:
4711:
4707:
4702:
4698:
4696:
4695:Colin Edwards
4692:
4688:
4682:
4678:
4674:
4669:
4665:
4661:
4660:
4659:
4655:
4651:
4646:
4642:
4638:
4634:
4633:
4632:
4628:
4624:
4620:
4616:
4582:
4579:
4574:
4567:
4566:
4565:
4561:
4557:
4553:
4548:
4547:
4546:
4543:
4538:
4531:
4530:
4529:
4525:
4521:
4517:
4516:MOS:SPORTFLAG
4513:
4512:
4511:
4507:
4504:
4501:
4497:
4493:
4489:
4488:
4487:
4483:
4479:
4475:
4474:MOS:SPORTFLAG
4471:
4470:Kim Clijsters
4467:
4463:
4462:
4461:
4458:
4453:
4446:
4442:
4441:
4440:
4436:
4432:
4427:
4426:MOS:SPORTFLAG
4423:
4422:
4421:
4418:
4413:
4406:
4405:
4404:
4403:
4399:
4395:
4389:
4386:
4385:
4384:
4381:
4376:
4369:
4368:
4367:
4366:
4362:
4358:
4351:
4347:
4346:
4345:
4342:
4337:
4330:
4329:
4328:
4327:
4323:
4319:
4314:
4312:
4308:
4302:
4299:
4295:
4290:
4286:
4282:
4279:
4266:
4262:
4258:
4253:
4248:
4247:
4244:
4241:
4236:
4230:
4229:
4228:
4224:
4220:
4216:
4212:
4211:
4210:
4206:
4205:contributions
4202:
4198:
4197:
4187:
4186:
4185:
4184:
4165:
4162:
4157:
4150:
4149:
4148:
4144:
4140:
4135:
4134:
4133:
4130:
4125:
4119:
4118:Ashley Sutton
4115:
4110:
4109:
4108:
4104:
4100:
4096:
4095:
4094:
4091:
4086:
4079:
4078:
4077:
4073:
4069:
4064:
4063:
4062:
4059:
4054:
4047:
4046:
4045:
4044:
4040:
4036:
4032:
4027:
4024:
4021:
4017:
4013:
4009:
4005:
4004:
4003:
3999:
3995:
3990:
3980:
3976:
3973:
3970:
3963:
3956:
3955:
3954:
3950:
3946:
3938:
3927:
3920:
3913:
3912:
3909:
3905:
3902:
3899:
3895:
3894:
3893:
3890:
3889:
3879:
3872:
3871:
3870:
3866:
3862:
3858:
3857:MOS:SPORTFLAG
3851:
3841:
3831:
3824:
3823:
3822:
3819:
3818:
3811:
3810:
3809:
3808:
3804:
3801:
3798:
3794:
3786:
3782:
3778:
3774:
3770:
3765:
3761:
3757:
3753:
3749:
3741:
3737:
3733:
3729:
3728:
3727:
3726:
3723:
3719:
3716:
3713:
3708:
3707:
3706:
3705:
3704:
3703:
3698:
3694:
3690:
3686:
3681:
3677:
3674:
3673:
3670:
3666:
3662:
3660:
3655:
3654:
3649:
3648:
3641:
3637:
3633:
3629:
3628:
3627:
3623:
3619:
3611:
3601:
3597:
3593:
3589:
3585:
3581:
3577:
3573:
3568:
3567:
3564:
3560:
3557:
3554:
3550:
3544:
3538:
3537:
3536:
3535:
3532:
3528:
3524:
3519:
3516:
3514:
3510:
3505:
3499:
3498:
3495:
3492:
3487:
3483:
3479:
3476:
3474:
3470:
3467:
3464:
3459:
3455:
3452:
3451:
3434:
3430:
3426:
3422:
3418:
3414:
3413:
3412:
3411:
3410:
3409:
3408:
3407:
3406:
3405:
3404:
3403:
3402:
3401:
3400:
3399:
3381:
3377:
3373:
3369:
3368:
3367:
3366:
3365:
3364:
3363:
3362:
3361:
3360:
3359:
3358:
3357:
3356:
3355:
3354:
3336:
3335:
3334:
3333:
3332:
3331:
3330:
3329:
3328:
3327:
3326:
3325:
3324:
3323:
3322:
3321:
3303:
3298:
3293:
3292:
3291:
3290:
3289:
3288:
3287:
3286:
3285:
3284:
3283:
3282:
3281:
3280:
3279:
3278:
3259:
3258:
3257:
3256:
3255:
3254:
3253:
3252:
3251:
3250:
3249:
3248:
3247:
3246:
3245:
3244:
3225:
3224:
3223:
3219:
3216:
3213:
3209:
3205:
3204:
3203:
3199:
3195:
3190:
3189:
3188:
3187:
3186:
3185:
3184:
3183:
3182:
3181:
3180:
3179:
3164:
3163:
3162:
3161:
3160:
3159:
3158:
3157:
3156:
3155:
3154:
3153:
3138:
3137:
3136:
3135:
3134:
3133:
3132:
3131:
3130:
3129:
3128:
3127:
3113:
3112:does the work
3108:
3107:
3106:
3105:
3104:
3103:
3102:
3101:
3100:
3099:
3098:
3097:
3082:
3081:
3080:
3079:
3078:
3077:
3076:
3075:
3074:
3073:
3072:
3071:
3057:
3053:
3052:
3051:
3050:
3049:
3048:
3047:
3046:
3045:
3044:
3043:
3042:
3027:
3026:
3025:
3021:
3017:
3011:
3009:
3006:
3001:
2994:
2993:
2992:
2988:
2985:
2982:
2978:
2974:
2969:
2968:
2967:
2964:
2959:
2952:
2951:
2950:
2946:
2943:
2940:
2936:
2935:
2934:
2931:
2926:
2920:
2916:
2915:
2912:
2908:
2905:
2902:
2898:
2893:
2889:
2885:
2881:
2877:
2873:
2869:
2866:
2864:
2861:
2859:
2854:
2852:
2847:per above. ~
2846:
2843:
2837:
2833:
2830:
2827:
2822:
2821:
2820:
2816:
2812:
2808:
2804:
2800:
2797:
2796:
2795:
2791:
2787:
2783:
2780:
2778:
2774:
2770:
2766:
2763:
2761:
2757:
2753:
2749:
2746:
2734:
2733:
2732:
2728:
2725:
2722:
2717:
2716:
2715:
2711:
2707:
2703:
2698:
2693:
2692:
2691:
2687:
2684:
2681:
2676:
2675:
2674:
2670:
2666:
2662:
2658:
2653:
2650:
2648:
2644:
2640:
2634:
2630:
2626:
2625:
2622:
2618:
2616:
2612:
2608:
2604:
2601:
2599:
2595:
2591:
2587:
2583:
2576:
2566:
2559:
2556:
2554:
2551:
2546:
2540:
2537:
2535:
2534:
2530:
2526:
2522:
2516:
2512:
2509:
2508:
2504:
2502:
2501:
2497:
2493:
2489:
2485:
2481:
2477:
2470:
2466:
2462:
2458:
2454:
2450:
2443:
2440:
2437:
2432:
2427:
2426:
2421:
2416:
2412:
2408:
2404:
2399:
2391:
2390:
2389:
2388:
2384:
2380:
2375:
2370:
2367:
2362:
2360:
2350:
2347:parameter to
2338:
2334:
2327:
2326:
2320:
2316:
2312:
2308:
2304:
2296:
2295:
2294:
2293:
2289:
2283:
2277:
2272:
2267:
2265:
2259:
2247:
2238:
2235:parameter to
2226:
2222:
2215:
2214:
2208:
2204:
2199:
2196:
2193:
2188:
2184:
2180:
2172:
2171:
2170:
2169:
2165:
2161:
2157:
2147:
2144:parameter to
2135:
2131:
2124:
2123:
2117:
2111:
2107:
2103:
2099:
2095:
2092:
2091:
2090:
2089:
2086:
2082:
2080:
2074:
2065:
2061:
2059:
2055:
2051:
2047:
2043:
2042:
2041:
2040:
2036:
2032:
2027:
2026:
2021:
2018:
2012:
2006:
2002:
1998:
1994:
1993:
1992:
1988:
1984:
1980:
1979:
1978:
1977:
1973:
1969:
1961:
1958:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1946:
1944:
1943:
1940:
1934:
1927:
1917:
1913:
1911:
1910:
1906:
1902:
1898:
1890:
1878:
1874:
1870:
1864:
1863:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1859:
1858:
1857:
1856:
1855:
1846:
1842:
1838:
1833:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1822:
1818:
1814:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1800:
1796:
1792:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1781:
1777:
1773:
1766:
1758:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1722:
1718:
1714:
1709:
1703:
1693:
1683:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1670:
1666:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1644:
1637:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1611:
1607:
1603:
1596:
1586:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1538:
1531:
1524:
1517:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1499:
1496:
1495:
1490:
1483:
1479:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1456:
1446:
1439:
1435:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1418:
1410:
1403:
1400:
1393:
1386:
1383:
1376:
1369:
1365:
1364:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1344:
1334:
1327:
1322:
1320:
1316:
1308:
1306:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1289:
1287:
1286:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1268:
1264:
1256:
1252:
1249:
1246:
1241:
1236:
1235:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1197:
1194:
1191:
1186:
1181:
1180:
1171:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1161:
1158:
1153:
1148:
1147:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1087:
1079:
1076:
1073:
1068:
1063:
1062:
1054:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1045:
1042:
1037:
1032:
1031:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1008:
988:
985:
982:
977:
972:
971:
963:
962:
961:
958:
957:
956:
951:
943:
939:
938:
937:
934:
931:
926:
921:
920:
912:
907:
901:
900:
899:
896:
895:
894:
889:
880:
879:
878:
875:
872:
867:
862:
861:
853:
842:
836:
835:Internet user
832:
831:
830:
827:
826:
825:
820:
812:
808:
803:
802:
801:
798:
795:
790:
785:
784:
775:
774:
773:
770:
769:
768:
763:
755:
750:
749:
748:
745:
742:
737:
732:
731:
722:
721:
720:
717:
716:
715:
710:
701:
700:
699:
698:
695:
692:
687:
682:
681:
668:
660:
657:
656:
655:
650:
641:
640:
639:
636:
632:
631:
630:
627:
626:
625:
620:
612:
611:
610:
609:
606:
597:
593:
590:
589:
588:
583:
575:
574:
573:
572:
569:
565:
552:
549:
548:
547:
542:
532:
531:
530:
525:
516:
512:
510:
505:
504:
503:
500:
496:
494:
491:
490:
489:
484:
473:
465:
464:
463:
460:
455:
454:
453:
450:
449:
448:
443:
435:
434:
433:
432:
429:
425:
416:
414:
409:
406:
402:
401:
400:
399:
395:
394:
390:
385:
384:
375:
365:
362:
359:
354:
349:
348:
340:
339:
338:
337:
334:
327:
324:
320:
319:Gwyndaf Evans
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
299:
298:
295:
292:
287:
282:
281:
273:
269:
268:
267:
266:
263:
257:
252:
251:
250:
249:
246:
242:
234:
228:
225:
224:
223:
218:
209:
204:
201:
198:
195:
191:
187:
186:
184:
183:
182:
179:
175:
171:
168:
167:
164:
163:
160:
154:
150:
146:
145:
144:
143:
140:
136:
132:
128:
120:
106:
89:
85:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
5622:
5609:
5606:
5591:
5572:
5561:
5554:
5542:
5522:
5519:Edit request
5434:
5423:
5387:
5383:
5377:
5375:
5361:
5295:
5276:
5152:
5086:
5010:
5008:
5004:
4950:
4849:
4841:
4839:motorsports.
4835:
4833:
4829:
4826:
4797:
4779:
4775:
4768:
4764:
4759:
4757:
4752:
4747:
4738:
4699:
4684:
4614:
4466:Milos Raonic
4391:
4354:
4315:
4310:
4306:
4303:
4297:
4291:
4287:
4283:
4277:
4275:
4191:
4028:
4025:
3926:Lance Stroll
3887:Lee Vilenski
3884:
3845:says to use
3816:Lee Vilenski
3813:
3790:
3768:
3759:
3664:
3657:
3650:
3517:
3496:
3493:
3490:
3477:
3453:
3420:
3416:
3379:
3375:
3371:
3296:
3111:
3055:
2896:
2891:
2876:24.77.42.223
2857:
2850:
2844:
2781:
2764:
2747:
2697:Test cricket
2656:
2651:
2628:
2623:
2620:
2619:
2607:24.77.42.223
2602:
2557:
2538:
2518:
2487:
2473:
2441:
2435:
2428:
2417:Heading text
2397:
2376:
2371:
2368:
2363:
2356:
2348:
2337:edit request
2321:Edit request
2302:
2268:
2244:
2236:
2225:edit request
2194:
2183:WP:TESTCASES
2178:
2153:
2145:
2134:edit request
2118:Edit request
2098:WP:RECENTISM
2078:
2066:in my mind.
2064:WP:RECENTISM
2028:
2022:
2019:
2016:
1965:
1950:
1920:
1894:
1739:
1707:
1635:
1529:
1515:
1485:
1399:John Surtees
1382:Alex Zanardi
1323:
1319:this version
1315:this version
1312:
1293:
1278:Andy Mabbett
1260:
1230:
1229:
1200:
1175:
1174:
1142:
1141:
1127:
1110:83.67.34.115
1095:83.67.34.115
1091:
1057:
1056:
1026:
1025:
966:
965:
946:
945:
915:
914:
884:
883:
856:
855:
840:
815:
814:
779:
778:
758:
757:
753:
726:
725:
705:
704:
676:
675:
672:
645:
644:
615:
614:
601:
578:
577:
563:
562:
537:
536:
520:
519:
508:
506:
479:
478:
438:
437:
420:
412:
387:
381:
379:
343:
342:
330:
323:Derek Ringer
302:
276:
275:
259:
241:Andy Mabbett
238:
213:
212:
174:John Surtees
169:
156:
135:Andy Mabbett
124:
77:
40:WikiProjects
29:
5602:prev series
5579:prev series
5568:<br: -->
5390:WP:RFCCLOSE
5381:delusional.
5209:Herostratus
4318:Herostratus
4307:people from
4294:Formula One
4285:the race.
4114:Jason Plato
4016:Formula One
3878:flagathlete
3773:Herostratus
3680:WP:NOTAVOTE
3632:Herostratus
3572:Herostratus
3425:Herostratus
3194:Herostratus
2868:Herostratus
2752:Indy beetle
2525:Herostratus
2511:Herostratus
2482:topics and
2457:WP:RFCCLOSE
2251:{{tooltip}}
1983:Holdenman05
1270:microformat
1263:this notice
383:thedemonhog
258:zealously.
5674:Categories
5564:
5465:DH85868993
5442:Hairy Dude
4831:off-topic.
4617:. Look at
2480:motorsport
2377:Thanks. –
2359:MOS:NUMERO
2341:|answered=
2229:|answered=
2138:|answered=
2050:DH85868993
2029:Thoughts?
2023:Full list
1997:DH85868993
1968:DH85868993
1966:Thoughts?
1935:. Thanks!
1901:DH85868993
1791:Gaeaman787
1740:How about
1713:DH85868993
1650:DH85868993
1567:DH85868993
1420:DH85868993
844:something.
93:Motorsport
84:Motorsport
59:Motorsport
5589:section.
5505:Pelmeen10
5335:MOS:FLAGS
4979:WP:BURDEN
4953:WP:BURDEN
4921:synthesis
4916:WP:BURDEN
4801:question.
4769:competent
4615:spectacle
4492:Davis Cup
4445:WP:TENNIS
3967:template.
3760:guideline
2977:MOS:FLAGS
2484:infoboxes
2403:Jonesey95
2307:Jonesey95
2179:Not done:
2160:Pelmeen10
2102:QueenCake
2017:Hi all,
564:thank you
424:Paul Dana
5378:official
5331:WP:MOTOR
4701:MOS:FLAG
4643:and the
4637:MOS:FLAG
4552:MOS:FLAG
4494:and the
4298:national
4278:formally
4215:MOS:FLAG
4031:MOS:FLAG
3928:we have
3850:flagicon
3793:WP:MOTOR
3764:MOS:FLAG
3756:MOS:FLAG
3752:MOS:FLAG
3693:contribs
3669:MOS:FLAG
3659:MOS:FLAG
3653:MOS:FLAG
3549:WP:MOTOR
3458:WP:MOTOR
3415:Anyway,
2973:WP:MOTOR
2897:formally
2892:official
2710:contribs
2669:contribs
2586:MOS:FLAG
2476:MOS:FLAG
2449:MOS:FLAG
2379:Reidgreg
2287:contribs
2031:Poppo154
1938:0x0077BE
1869:NaBUru38
1837:Frietjes
1817:NaBUru38
1772:Frietjes
1746:NaBUru38
1665:Frietjes
1602:Frietjes
1463:Frietjes
1350:Frietjes
1261:Despite
1215:Drdisque
1138:WP:Color
568:Drdisque
499:Drdisque
459:Drdisque
428:Drdisque
30:template
4819:Benelli
4760:minimum
4496:Fed Cup
4311:sent by
3598:, and
3592:Sea Ane
3518:Comment
3491:Laundry
3478:Support
3454:Comment
3421:passion
3140:method.
2888:Sea Ane
2799:Sea Ane
2786:Sea Ane
2558:Support
1914:RfC on
1482:IndyCar
852:fanatic
333:DeLarge
262:DeLarge
159:DeLarge
5655:Kaictl
5625:Kaictl
5611:Kaictl
5498:nowrap
5479:Kaictl
5205:WP:BRD
5006:facts.
4984:WP:AGF
4957:WP:AGF
4691:MotoGP
4677:WP:NOR
4292:Hmmm,
4008:doping
3596:HAL333
3576:Pyrope
3208:battle
3084:point.
2872:Pyrope
2453:edited
2187:JJMC89
2094:The359
1813:sample
1516:merger
1480:, and
1375:nowrap
1265:, the
1012:rogerd
949:Adrian
887:Adrian
818:Adrian
761:Adrian
708:Adrian
648:Adrian
635:Readro
618:Adrian
605:Readro
581:Adrian
540:Adrian
523:Adrian
482:Adrian
441:Adrian
405:Pyrope
272:WP:BLP
256:WP:BLP
216:Adrian
178:Pyrope
170:Oppose
36:scale.
5546:Medal
5172:fact.
5158:Pyrop
5109:Pyrop
5092:Pyrop
5087:don't
4737:that?
4572:Pyrop
4536:Pyrop
4451:Pyrop
4411:Pyrop
4374:Pyrop
4335:Pyrop
4234:Pyrop
4155:Pyrop
4123:Pyrop
4084:Pyrop
4052:Pyrop
3962:flagg
3758:is a
3494:Pizza
3486:WP:OR
3302:WP:1Q
3227:side.
3029:have.
2999:Pyrop
2957:Pyrop
2924:Pyrop
2544:Pyrop
2345:|ans=
2335:This
2233:|ans=
2223:This
2142:|ans=
2132:This
1530:embed
1493:broil
1488:Royal
1455:stack
1317:with
1267:hCard
1051:BTW,
954:M. H.
892:M. H.
823:M. H.
766:M. H.
713:M. H.
653:M. H.
623:M. H.
586:M. H.
545:M. H.
528:M. H.
487:M. H.
446:M. H.
393:edits
303:agree
221:M. H.
28:This
5659:talk
5645:talk
5641:SSSB
5629:talk
5615:talk
5581:and
5530:talk
5509:talk
5483:talk
5469:talk
5446:talk
5408:talk
5388:Per
5340:SSSB
5321:talk
5317:SSSB
5305:talk
5286:talk
5282:SSSB
5231:talk
5213:talk
5179:talk
5175:SSSB
5153:only
5143:talk
5019:talk
4965:talk
4905:talk
4901:SSSB
4873:talk
4869:SSSB
4856:talk
4808:talk
4804:SSSB
4798:this
4787:talk
4765:best
4710:talk
4675:and
4654:talk
4650:SSSB
4627:talk
4560:talk
4524:talk
4482:talk
4435:talk
4398:talk
4388:Here
4361:talk
4322:talk
4261:talk
4257:SSSB
4223:talk
4201:talk
4193:5225
4143:talk
4103:talk
4072:talk
4039:talk
4014:and
3998:talk
3949:talk
3945:SSSB
3937:flag
3919:flag
3865:talk
3835:and
3777:talk
3736:talk
3689:talk
3678:and
3636:talk
3622:talk
3618:SSSB
3527:talk
3523:SSSB
3429:talk
3380:tell
3297:have
3198:talk
3020:talk
3016:SSSB
2919:Tvx1
2880:SSSB
2815:talk
2790:talk
2773:talk
2756:talk
2706:talk
2665:talk
2643:talk
2639:SSSB
2636:RfC.
2611:talk
2594:talk
2529:talk
2515:talk
2496:talk
2490:? --
2465:talk
2459:. --
2451:was
2407:talk
2398:Done
2383:talk
2311:talk
2303:Done
2281:talk
2258:abbr
2185:. —
2164:talk
2106:talk
2079:Talk
2069:The5
2054:talk
2035:talk
2025:here
2001:talk
1987:talk
1972:talk
1933:here
1905:talk
1873:talk
1841:talk
1821:talk
1795:talk
1789:for.
1776:talk
1750:talk
1742:this
1717:talk
1669:talk
1654:talk
1606:talk
1571:talk
1478:TORC
1467:talk
1424:talk
1354:talk
1300:talk
1245:talk
1219:talk
1209:and
1190:talk
1157:talk
1132:and
1114:talk
1099:talk
1072:talk
1041:talk
1016:talk
981:talk
930:talk
871:talk
841:user
794:talk
741:talk
691:talk
389:talk
376:Move
358:talk
291:talk
5435:At
5397:rfc
4836:all
4668:FIM
4666:or
4664:FIA
4012:FIM
3695:)
3372:ask
2858:333
2851:HAL
2845:Yes
2782:Yes
2765:Yes
2712:)
2671:)
2657:yes
2621:Yes
2603:Yes
2570:or
2539:Yes
2369:to
2343:or
2231:or
2140:or
1708:and
1636:can
1239:Jay
1233:Zue
1184:Jay
1178:Zue
1151:Jay
1145:Zue
1066:Jay
1060:Zue
1035:Jay
1029:Zue
975:Jay
969:Zue
924:Jay
918:Zue
865:Jay
859:Zue
809:or
788:Jay
782:Zue
735:Jay
729:Zue
685:Jay
679:Zue
352:Jay
346:Zue
321:or
313:or
285:Jay
279:Zue
133:).
5676::
5661:)
5647:)
5631:)
5617:)
5532:)
5511:)
5501:}}
5495:{{
5485:)
5471:)
5448:)
5410:)
5400:}}
5394:{{
5353:1
5323:)
5307:)
5288:)
5233:)
5215:)
5197:1
5181:)
5145:)
5021:)
4996:1
4967:)
4942:1
4907:)
4892:1
4875:)
4858:)
4810:)
4789:)
4781:--
4730:1
4712:)
4704:--
4679:.
4656:)
4629:)
4562:)
4526:)
4508:1
4484:)
4468:?
4437:)
4429:--
4400:)
4363:)
4324:)
4263:)
4225:)
4207:)
4203:•
4145:)
4137:--
4105:)
4074:)
4066:--
4041:)
4000:)
3977:1
3965:}}
3959:{{
3951:)
3940:}}
3934:{{
3922:}}
3916:{{
3906:1
3881:}}
3875:{{
3867:)
3853:}}
3847:{{
3843:}}
3837:{{
3833:}}
3827:{{
3805:1
3779:)
3738:)
3720:1
3691:/
3638:)
3624:)
3613:}}
3610:TB
3607:{{
3594:,
3590:,
3586:,
3582:,
3578:,
3574:,
3561:1
3529:)
3511:)
3508:c̄
3497:03
3471:1
3431:)
3220:1
3200:)
3022:)
2989:1
2947:1
2909:1
2886:,
2882:,
2878:,
2874:,
2870:,
2834:1
2817:)
2801:,
2792:)
2775:)
2758:)
2748:No
2729:1
2708:/
2688:1
2667:/
2659:.
2645:)
2627:,
2613:)
2596:)
2578:}}
2572:{{
2568:}}
2562:{{
2531:)
2498:)
2467:)
2433:.
2409:)
2385:)
2349:no
2313:)
2305:–
2290:)
2284:|
2266:.
2260:}}
2256:{{
2237:no
2166:)
2146:no
2108:)
2083:)
2056:)
2048:.
2037:)
2003:)
1989:)
1974:)
1929:}}
1923:{{
1907:)
1899:.
1875:)
1843:)
1823:)
1797:)
1778:)
1768:}}
1762:{{
1752:)
1719:)
1705:}}
1699:{{
1695:}}
1689:{{
1685:}}
1679:{{
1671:)
1656:)
1646:}}
1640:{{
1608:)
1598:}}
1592:{{
1588:}}
1582:{{
1573:)
1540:}}
1534:{{
1526:}}
1520:{{
1469:)
1458:}}
1452:{{
1448:}}
1442:{{
1426:)
1412:}}
1406:{{
1395:}}
1389:{{
1378:}}
1372:{{
1356:)
1346:}}
1340:{{
1336:}}
1330:{{
1302:)
1280:|
1221:)
1140:.
1116:)
1101:)
1018:)
1010:--
911:it
477:.
475:}}
469:{{
391:•
331:--
260:--
243:|
157:--
137:|
5657:(
5643:(
5627:(
5613:(
5528:(
5507:(
5481:(
5467:(
5444:(
5406:(
5351:x
5348:v
5345:T
5319:(
5303:(
5284:(
5229:(
5211:(
5195:x
5192:v
5189:T
5177:(
5163:e
5141:(
5131:x
5128:v
5125:T
5114:e
5097:e
5017:(
4994:x
4991:v
4988:T
4963:(
4940:x
4937:v
4934:T
4903:(
4890:x
4887:v
4884:T
4871:(
4854:(
4806:(
4785:(
4728:x
4725:v
4722:T
4708:(
4683:.
4652:(
4625:(
4577:e
4558:(
4541:e
4522:(
4506:x
4503:v
4500:T
4498:.
4480:(
4456:e
4433:(
4416:e
4396:(
4379:e
4359:(
4340:e
4320:(
4259:(
4239:e
4221:(
4199:(
4195:C
4160:e
4141:(
4128:e
4101:(
4089:e
4070:(
4057:e
4037:(
3996:(
3975:x
3972:v
3969:T
3947:(
3904:x
3901:v
3898:T
3863:(
3803:x
3800:v
3797:T
3775:(
3734:(
3718:x
3715:v
3712:T
3687:(
3667:(
3634:(
3620:(
3602::
3570:@
3559:x
3556:v
3553:T
3525:(
3503:d
3500:(
3469:x
3466:v
3463:T
3427:(
3218:x
3215:v
3212:T
3196:(
3018:(
3004:e
2987:x
2984:v
2981:T
2979:.
2962:e
2945:x
2942:v
2939:T
2929:e
2907:x
2904:v
2901:T
2832:x
2829:v
2826:T
2813:(
2788:(
2771:(
2754:(
2727:x
2724:v
2721:T
2704:(
2686:x
2683:v
2680:T
2663:(
2641:(
2609:(
2592:(
2549:e
2527:(
2513:(
2494:(
2463:(
2405:(
2381:(
2309:(
2278:(
2275:e
2200:)
2198:C
2195:·
2192:T
2190:(
2162:(
2104:(
2075:(
2071:9
2052:(
2033:(
1999:(
1985:(
1970:(
1903:(
1871:(
1839:(
1819:(
1793:(
1774:(
1748:(
1715:(
1667:(
1652:(
1604:(
1569:(
1465:(
1422:(
1352:(
1298:(
1247:)
1243:(
1217:(
1192:)
1188:(
1159:)
1155:(
1112:(
1097:(
1074:)
1070:(
1043:)
1039:(
1014:(
983:)
979:(
932:)
928:(
873:)
869:(
796:)
792:(
743:)
739:(
693:)
689:(
457:-
360:)
356:(
293:)
289:(
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.