105:
87:
56:
21:
237:
As far as i know for formal
English globally UK spellings are the standard pretty much everywhere except the USA. e.g India and Pakistan both have English as co-official language and it seems to be closer to UK English? Second language learners outside the USA sometimes learn USA English, but the
241:
So it seems like an international
English closer to UK English should be the default, except for articles relating to the USA? but it seems to be the other way around, most articles seem to be full of USA spellings etc. except for articles about something regionally specific outside the USA. ()
206:
How do you
Wikipedians think of my paint bucket? I am thinking of using the relevant-to-the-template's-subject, more appropriate logo other than the more general logo, but, firstly, I need some opinions.
36:
116:, a group of editors promoting better access for disabled or otherwise disadvantaged users. For more information, such as what you can do to help, see the main project page.
155:"for color-blind users.The". There should be a space after the period and before the "The" (the reason). Not a big deal and I would have fied myslef but fear screwing up..
199:
305:
112:
92:
234:
A bit tangential but i expect you have looked into this. What language is en.wikseems to be the other way around, ipedia supposed to be in?
67:
27:
217:
104:
86:
73:
55:
198:
275:
267:
208:
286:
183:
160:
271:
249:
266:
Your post is completely off-topic for this page, which is about discussing improvements to
279:
176:
156:
299:
261:
245:
152:
290:
253:
224:
187:
164:
238:
English taught as a second language in continental Europe is UK English.
20:
197:
49:
15:
171:
274:- if you have more to ask, I suggest that you post at
66:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
8:
270:. You may find answers to your questions at
81:
122:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Accessibility
83:
110:This redirect is within the scope of
53:
7:
72:It is of interest to the following
306:WikiProject Accessibility articles
125:Template:WikiProject Accessibility
31:
26:This template was considered for
14:
103:
85:
54:
19:
1:
188:00:00, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
165:20:45, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
225:03:35, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
194:A new logo for the template
322:
113:WikiProject Accessibility
98:
80:
291:11:47, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
254:02:35, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
202:A proposed paint bucket
203:
128:Accessibility articles
201:
268:Template:Overcolored
34:. The result of the
204:
147:"Typo" in template
68:content assessment
144:
143:
140:
139:
136:
135:
48:
47:
313:
282:
265:
215:
213:
179:
174:
130:
129:
126:
123:
120:
107:
100:
99:
89:
82:
59:
58:
50:
33:
23:
16:
321:
320:
316:
315:
314:
312:
311:
310:
296:
295:
280:
259:
232:
211:
209:
196:
177:
170:
149:
127:
124:
121:
118:
117:
12:
11:
5:
319:
317:
309:
308:
298:
297:
294:
293:
231:
228:
195:
192:
191:
190:
148:
145:
142:
141:
138:
137:
134:
133:
131:
108:
96:
95:
90:
78:
77:
71:
60:
46:
45:
32:20 August 2024
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
318:
307:
304:
303:
301:
292:
288:
284:
277:
273:
269:
263:
258:
257:
256:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
229:
227:
226:
223:
221:
216:
214:
200:
193:
189:
185:
181:
173:
169:
168:
167:
166:
162:
158:
154:
146:
132:
119:Accessibility
115:
114:
109:
106:
102:
101:
97:
94:
93:Accessibility
91:
88:
84:
79:
75:
69:
65:
61:
57:
52:
51:
43:
39:
38:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
244:
240:
236:
233:
219:
212:Gamingforfun
210:
205:
151:At least in
150:
111:
74:WikiProjects
63:
41:
35:
276:WP:Teahouse
230:USA English
153:Metrication
37:discussion
272:WP:ENGVAR
157:comp.arch
300:Category
64:redirect
42:redirect
28:deletion
262:Irtapil
246:Irtapil
283:rose64
180:rose64
70:scale.
172:Fixed
62:This
40:was "
287:talk
285:🌹 (
278:. --
250:talk
220:talk
184:talk
175:. --
161:talk
281:Red
178:Red
30:on
302::
289:)
252:)
186:)
163:)
44:".
264::
260:@
248:(
222:)
218:(
182:(
159:(
76::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
