22:
135:
77:
53:
87:
288:, I could ask why don't you try to reach a consensus before adding it? The band was on stage when the attacks happened, yes. Many things were happening at the same time, but this is a template that should link to the main related events and concepts, and these are just people who happened to be there. I don't see the relevant and I don't believe there
250:
Well, this is the issue. Are the "related events" things that involved ISIL anywhere in the world, "terrorist" actions in 2015, "terrorist" actions in France, events involving so-called Muslim extremism ... the possibilities seem pretty endless without some sort of criteria. (I've been careful with
552:
While stalking etc does go on, I don't think it is likely to impact greatly here and proving the pattern can be problematic. Certainly, one clash doesn't justify such a claim. I'd let it drop for now, LjL, unless you do indeed have evidence of some sort of pattern. That said, Yossimgim, your
683:
It's pretty much irrelevant to the attacks. They survived, nothing happened concerning them. They're not a band of such notability that anyone thinking of the attack will think of the band, either (although people who know the band may conversely think of the attack, making a mention of the
781:
kept removing the template from the main article and the reactions article every time I added it with the simple edit summary of "Relevance?" I was confused myself. Check the article's edit history if you don't believe me.
865:
well then, as I said, I agree with WWGB that the template should probably not be included there, but that doesn't mean that the article shouldn't be listed within the template. They are two separate things. The
813:
attacks, not those related events, so that's the article it belongs in. Anyway, see the section I've started below: what's the difference between the
Brussels attacks and the other "Related events" listed?
949:-perpetrated attacks in Western countries. Since the article about them does claim ISIL responsibility, with sources, until there is some concrete reason to differentiate those attacks, they
708:
Thanks for that, but I was asking John and your comment of "They're not a band of such notability that anyone thinking of the attack will think of the band" is quite frankly bollocks.
601:
I don't think it's necessary. The theater is linked here, the band and its members aren't needed. We wouldn't add the teams at the game and other secondary articles on the issue. --
251:
my words because, for example, one person's terrorist is another person's freedom fighter, although I accept that the common view is that this was indeed a terrorist attack). -
938:
was the one making this claim, but I don't see them editing this template or discussing it on this talk page; if it was discussed elsewhere, well, it wasn't the right place.
987:
957:
941:
In any case, this template lists several attacks under "Related events" where the only thing in common is that they were seemingly perpetrated by
992:
1002:
144:
63:
670:
I agree that the individual band members and the support band are not necessary, but why would the main band themselves be excluded, John?
446:
439:
394:
363:
325:
183:
553:
rationale is completely useless and will have no impact at all on any decision made regarding this discussion. I think you need to review
109:
997:
232:
template (an "ISIL" template, for instance, which luckily already exists) listing the terrorist attacks they perpetrated. Then
926:
was removed from this template, it was done with the justification that they are not "notable", but clearly they must be very
805:
article (although I've had disagreements about that sort of thing in the past). This templates includes events related to the
100:
58:
33:
802:
798:
191:
571:
The incident was a fair bit bigger than the particular edit here. You can check the editor's contributions page...
324:
The band was on stage during the attack (linked in the main article) thus absolutely related link in the navbox.
450:
398:
367:
329:
945:, and I have seen no evidence or reasoning on why the Brussels bombings would somehow be different from other
225:
I repeatedly tried to remove it but it was repeatedly readded, and my complaining on the talk page was no use.
39:
964:
of the main article and, as such, linked from within it; it shouldn't be linked from a separate template.
923:
833:
554:
524:
I lived in Paris for 6 years. I have my own opinions on this matter. Please don't project accusations.
308:
I don't, either. Seems more like a way for a fan to get a mention of their favourite band in a navbox. -
279:
901:
841:
787:
108:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
652:
The band, the names of the members of the band, the support band, are not necessary or helpful here. --
499:
606:
973:
961:
905:
879:
845:
823:
791:
747:
734:
716:
701:
678:
661:
645:
624:
610:
580:
566:
547:
533:
519:
493:
481:
472:
454:
416:
402:
388:
371:
357:
333:
317:
301:
260:
245:
220:
206:
176:
529:
489:
507:
897:
860:
837:
783:
620:
562:
313:
256:
216:
172:
931:
602:
379:
and me makes two, not one. On the other hand, you are one. And you are being disruptive.
657:
525:
485:
182:
I would do away with it. This sort of open-ended inclusion is how we ended up with the
927:
981:
969:
875:
819:
730:
697:
576:
543:
515:
468:
432:
412:
384:
353:
297:
241:
202:
92:
407:
That's not how it works. You added it, the burden is yours to justify the addition.
741:
710:
672:
639:
637:
without knowing this discussion was going ahead. It was then reverted. Oh well.
616:
558:
376:
309:
252:
212:
168:
82:
935:
778:
722:
653:
134:
76:
52:
965:
871:
815:
772:
726:
693:
572:
539:
511:
477:
464:
408:
380:
349:
293:
237:
198:
960:
article, on the other hand, has no place in this template. It is just a
167:
What is the criteria for inclusion of something as a "related event"? -
870:
of the template concerns the Paris attacks, not the
Brussels attacks.
105:
348:
here to reach a consensus, and the IP is not. Tells me something.
946:
942:
228:
I think the right way to handle this sort of thing is to have a
930:
since they have a prominent article that was even featured on
15:
133:
801:, so in my view, it should only be included within the
634:
503:
502:
me. You came here out of the blue right after I had an
341:
393:
Wait for fourth and fifth opinion before removing it.
211:
That is the type of thing which concerns me, yes. -
104:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
797:From which article? This is the template about the
236:template can be added to all the relevant pages.
721:You probably failed to notice, but this is not
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
538:You must think editors and admins are stupid.
8:
725:'s talk page, it's a template's talk page.
47:
342:reverted again with the same edit summary
958:Reactions to the 2016 Brussels bombings
49:
809:attacks, but it is, itself, about the
285:
98:This template is within the scope of
21:
19:
7:
362:Your one opinion is not consensus.
197:, which makes absolutely no sense.
38:It is of interest to the following
118:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject France
14:
85:
75:
51:
20:
922:The last time a mention of the
918:Including the Brussels bombings
988:Template-Class France articles
142:This template is supported by
1:
993:NA-importance France articles
748:15:04, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
735:14:53, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
717:14:50, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
702:14:23, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
679:11:56, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
662:13:38, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
646:10:35, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
625:00:31, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
611:23:45, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
581:00:34, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
567:00:31, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
548:22:44, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
534:22:40, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
520:22:39, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
494:22:36, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
473:21:46, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
455:21:45, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
417:21:47, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
403:21:41, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
389:21:40, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
372:21:39, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
358:21:37, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
334:21:38, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
318:21:35, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
302:21:33, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
261:21:29, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
246:21:14, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
221:21:11, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
207:21:05, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
177:21:00, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
112:and see a list of open tasks.
1003:All WikiProject France pages
688:probably appropriate in the
480:is clearly wrong. I support
803:November 2015 Paris attacks
799:November 2015 Paris attacks
440:January 2015 France attacks
121:Template:WikiProject France
1019:
974:22:59, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
953:as part of this template.
906:23:34, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
880:23:19, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
846:23:10, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
824:23:01, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
792:22:55, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
998:Paris task force articles
431:Do you propose to remove
141:
70:
46:
292:a worthwhile relevance.
924:2016 Brussels bombings
834:2016 Brussels bombings
777:For your information,
138:
934:. It was stated that
137:
739:No shit, professor.
145:the Paris task force
184:template about the
836:article, I meant.
139:
101:WikiProject France
34:content assessment
344:, even though we
160:
159:
156:
155:
152:
151:
1010:
864:
776:
744:
713:
675:
642:
463:No. Your point?
444:
438:
283:
126:
125:
122:
119:
116:
95:
90:
89:
88:
79:
72:
71:
66:
55:
48:
25:
24:
23:
16:
1018:
1017:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1009:
1008:
1007:
978:
977:
920:
858:
770:
768:
742:
711:
673:
640:
498:You seem to be
442:
436:
277:
275:
195:attacks article
165:
124:France articles
123:
120:
117:
114:
113:
91:
86:
84:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1016:
1014:
1006:
1005:
1000:
995:
990:
980:
979:
919:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
908:
887:
886:
885:
884:
883:
882:
851:
850:
849:
848:
827:
826:
767:
764:
763:
762:
761:
760:
759:
758:
757:
756:
755:
754:
753:
752:
751:
750:
665:
664:
649:
648:
630:
629:
628:
627:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
482:178.94.166.186
458:
457:
447:178.94.166.186
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
395:178.94.166.186
364:178.94.166.186
337:
336:
326:178.94.166.186
321:
320:
280:178.94.166.186
274:
271:
270:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
226:
164:
161:
158:
157:
154:
153:
150:
149:
140:
130:
129:
127:
110:the discussion
97:
96:
80:
68:
67:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1015:
1004:
1001:
999:
996:
994:
991:
989:
986:
985:
983:
976:
975:
971:
967:
963:
959:
954:
952:
951:should remain
948:
944:
939:
937:
933:
929:
925:
917:
907:
903:
899:
895:
894:
893:
892:
891:
890:
889:
888:
881:
877:
873:
869:
862:
857:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
847:
843:
839:
835:
831:
830:
829:
828:
825:
821:
817:
812:
808:
804:
800:
796:
795:
794:
793:
789:
785:
780:
774:
765:
749:
746:
745:
738:
737:
736:
732:
728:
724:
720:
719:
718:
715:
714:
707:
706:
705:
704:
703:
699:
695:
691:
687:
682:
681:
680:
677:
676:
669:
668:
667:
666:
663:
659:
655:
651:
650:
647:
644:
643:
636:
632:
631:
626:
622:
618:
614:
613:
612:
608:
604:
600:
599:
582:
578:
574:
570:
569:
568:
564:
560:
556:
551:
550:
549:
545:
541:
537:
536:
535:
531:
527:
523:
522:
521:
517:
513:
509:
505:
501:
497:
496:
495:
491:
487:
483:
479:
476:
475:
474:
470:
466:
462:
461:
460:
459:
456:
452:
448:
441:
434:
433:Charlie Hebdo
430:
429:
418:
414:
410:
406:
405:
404:
400:
396:
392:
391:
390:
386:
382:
378:
375:
374:
373:
369:
365:
361:
360:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
338:
335:
331:
327:
323:
322:
319:
315:
311:
307:
306:
305:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
281:
272:
262:
258:
254:
249:
248:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
224:
223:
222:
218:
214:
210:
209:
208:
204:
200:
196:
194:
189:
187:
181:
180:
179:
178:
174:
170:
162:
147:
146:
136:
132:
131:
128:
111:
107:
103:
102:
94:
93:France portal
83:
81:
78:
74:
73:
69:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
955:
950:
940:
921:
867:
810:
806:
769:
740:
709:
689:
685:
671:
638:
555:WP:CONSENSUS
506:with you on
345:
289:
286:Example text
276:
233:
229:
192:
185:
166:
143:
99:
40:WikiProjects
29:
932:In The News
898:Parsley Man
861:Parsley Man
838:Parsley Man
784:Parsley Man
635:this change
633:I did make
615:Exactly. -
500:WP:HOUNDING
982:Categories
962:WP:SPINOUT
766:Notability
692:article).
603:Ricky81682
435:link from
832:From the
526:Yossimgim
486:Yossimgim
504:argument
230:separate
193:November
30:template
928:notable
743:Lugnuts
712:Lugnuts
674:Lugnuts
641:Lugnuts
508:WP:ANEW
340:The IP
190:on the
188:attacks
186:January
896:Oh...
690:band's
686:attack
617:Sitush
559:Sitush
445:also?
377:Sitush
310:Sitush
253:Sitush
213:Sitush
169:Sitush
115:France
106:France
59:France
36:scale.
868:title
811:Paris
807:Paris
557:. -
163:Scope
64:Paris
28:This
970:talk
956:The
947:ISIL
943:ISIL
936:WWGB
902:talk
876:talk
842:talk
820:talk
788:talk
779:WWGB
731:talk
723:John
698:talk
658:talk
654:John
621:talk
607:talk
577:talk
563:talk
544:talk
530:talk
516:talk
490:talk
469:talk
451:talk
413:talk
399:talk
385:talk
368:talk
354:talk
330:talk
314:talk
298:talk
284:re:
273:Band
257:talk
242:talk
234:that
217:talk
203:talk
173:talk
966:LjL
872:LjL
816:LjL
773:LjL
727:LjL
694:LjL
573:LjL
540:LjL
512:LjL
478:LjL
465:LjL
409:LjL
381:LjL
350:LjL
346:are
294:LjL
238:LjL
199:LjL
984::
972:)
904:)
878:)
844:)
822:)
790:)
733:)
700:)
660:)
623:)
609:)
579:)
565:)
546:)
532:)
518:)
510:.
492:)
484:.
471:)
453:)
443:}}
437:{{
415:)
401:)
387:)
370:)
356:)
332:)
316:)
304:°
300:)
290:is
259:)
244:)
219:)
205:)
175:)
62::
968:(
900:(
874:(
863::
859:@
840:(
818:(
786:(
775::
771:@
729:(
696:(
656:(
619:(
605:(
575:(
561:(
542:(
528:(
514:(
488:(
467:(
449:(
411:(
397:(
383:(
366:(
352:(
328:(
312:(
296:(
282::
278:@
255:(
240:(
215:(
201:(
171:(
148:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
