173:
155:
183:
22:
77:
53:
127:
376:. But it hasn't. You willfully edited against consensus by reinserting the image in 2011 (which was quickly reverted) and then again in 2014, that time also without any discussion. As the creator of the logo, you have an obvious conflict of interest and should not reverting good-fath editors in the first place. I do not known where
553:
If network neutrality does not have a logo, then it should be removed from the template. This image has apparently confused at least one journalist. I know it confused me when I first saw it. I assumed that net neutrality was an organization. But then I researched it further and realized that it was
510:
Which is the problem. We create an image, and lazy journalists use our article and use our image as if it is anything official. Using this logo gives the impression that it is an official logo, while it is some fancy graphic with no history. It doesn't add anything to the articles it is used on, and
473:
As can be seen above, I am the second user to attempt to remove this image. It has been created by Camilo
Sanchez, who has quite a history of creating images (e.g. for countries and Europe) and trying to impose them on templates and articles. It is not the business of Knowledge (XXG) to create fancy
262:
It's misleading to put a logo in this template because network neutrality doesn't have an official logo. It's just a concept. The logo makes it seem like an official organization, which it is not. Plus, the logo that was in the template was ugly. I cannot think of anything of value that it added to
658:
is an example of a template having an image that conveys the identity of the concept. And I must add that the image has been here for over 2 years and nobody had a problem. this is just happening becuse user Fram is in love with me and loves chasing me around the wiki..thanks
457:
with a long history of personal altercations and attacks towards my edits in
Knowledge (XXG). Any changes on an image that has been on an article for over 2 years requires at least a discussion on the talk page. As usual, decision should be reach on consensus . Thanks
298:
I'd favor removing the logo. I don't think it adds anything of importance, it is not widely recognized as being associated with Net
Neutrality and would probably be non-neutral if it were recognized, it takes up space, and generally clutters things up.
474:
logos to be used in articles (I don't care about portals, there user-generated images or headers may be very welcome). What is the purpose of having such a self-created net neutrality logo here?
674:
I wasn't the first to object to this image, and you are now the only one defending your own image for this template, with three people opposing it. Consensus is against you, live with it.
136:
63:
743:
571:
hmm..excuse me, but if you are talking networks, you are definitely talking computer circuits, unless you have found a complete different system to transmit pieces of data. --
748:
599:. Why do I know this? Because I'm a certified network repairman. I'm certified by both Cisco and CompTIA to talk about these things. The only circuits in the Internet are
280:
The concept of aesthetic is totally personal. The logo has been there for a while and the community has allowed it to stay as it gives identity to the template. Thanks --
368:
The only reason it has been in place is because you have added it back, despite overwhelming support not to include it. Not that is matters, but the image has
733:
763:
753:
738:
768:
101:
773:
205:
493:
393:
345:
84:
58:
196:
160:
557:
On another note, why are there circuits in the logo? Network neutrality is about networks and neutrality, not computer circuits.--
554:
not an organization. If we don't stop this right away, the logo could spread to other sites and begin confusing a lot more people.
758:
33:
325:) is the only editor defending it, and he/she has re-added the logo six times, four of them without an edit summary.
604:
693:
664:
630:
596:
576:
544:
530:
501:
463:
285:
39:
710:
Is it intended to add every country with a seperate article on net neutrality to the list in the template? --
616:
587:
562:
397:
349:
608:
97:
204:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
100:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
182:
172:
154:
711:
689:
660:
626:
572:
540:
526:
497:
459:
408:
360:
320:
281:
268:
688:
Hey Fram, you are just not my type of man. So you live with it, stop chasing me around the wiki.--
715:
612:
558:
389:
248:
525:
Dude, are you in love with me or something? You have been chasing me over a year already. --
392:
stand in the matter, but accusing other editors of editing in bad-faith sure isn't helpful.
313:
I'm the fifth editor on this page in favor of removing the image, and have now done so. The
373:
366:"The logo is being removed by editors that oppose NN. The logo had been in place for years"
314:
539:
Btw, what do you mean official? its a concept, there is nothing to be official about NN.--
188:
679:
516:
479:
454:
439:
418:
377:
304:
264:
243:
created template to replace those already in existing articles. Improvements welcome.--
727:
244:
719:
697:
683:
668:
634:
620:
580:
566:
548:
534:
520:
505:
483:
467:
443:
422:
401:
353:
308:
289:
272:
252:
625:
Dude, relax, it's just a symbolic representation, not a detailed illustration. --
76:
52:
178:
372:
been in place longer than it has. We're not here to keep the status quo, and
675:
512:
475:
435:
414:
385:
381:
300:
93:
201:
89:
655:
126:
511:
can be misinterpreted as being an "official" net neutrality logo.
592:
489:
453:
A removal of an image on this template has been intended by a
15:
125:
200:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
365:
341:
338:
335:
332:
329:
326:
488:
Image has been used by major media organizations like
88:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
413:
For the record, I am in favor of net neutrality. --
263:
entries covering net neutrality, so I removed it.--
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
8:
744:Template-Class Computer networking articles
749:NA-importance Computer networking articles
149:
47:
611:? No. They're constructed with cables.--
607:are one example. Are they soldered onto
151:
49:
194:This template is within the scope of
110:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Computing
82:This template is within the scope of
21:
19:
7:
214:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Internet
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
734:Template-Class Computing articles
764:Template-Class Internet articles
754:All Computer networking articles
739:NA-importance Computing articles
181:
171:
153:
75:
51:
20:
769:NA-importance Internet articles
134:This template is supported by
113:Template:WikiProject Computing
1:
774:WikiProject Internet articles
253:22:45, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
217:Template:WikiProject Internet
208:and see a list of open tasks.
104:and see a list of open tasks.
434:I removed the logo again. --
790:
605:Permanent virtual circuits
484:07:33, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
468:20:29, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
309:14:02, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
290:17:14, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
273:12:17, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
720:00:28, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
444:12:35, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
423:12:26, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
166:
133:
70:
46:
698:14:47, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
684:06:56, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
669:03:03, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
635:04:33, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
621:03:11, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
597:circuit-switched network
581:02:46, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
567:20:31, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
549:18:16, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
535:17:41, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
521:07:38, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
506:06:48, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
402:16:32, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
354:01:19, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
588:packet-switched network
759:All Computing articles
609:printed circuit boards
585:No--the Internet is a
130:
98:information technology
137:Networking task force
129:
85:WikiProject Computing
374:consensus can change
197:WikiProject Internet
131:
116:Computing articles
34:content assessment
436:Jeff Ogden (W163)
415:Jeff Ogden (W163)
301:Jeff Ogden (W163)
236:
235:
232:
231:
228:
227:
220:Internet articles
148:
147:
144:
143:
781:
412:
364:
324:
222:
221:
218:
215:
212:
191:
186:
185:
175:
168:
167:
157:
150:
118:
117:
114:
111:
108:
79:
72:
71:
66:
55:
48:
25:
24:
23:
16:
789:
788:
784:
783:
782:
780:
779:
778:
724:
723:
708:
706:By country list
451:
406:
358:
318:
260:
241:
219:
216:
213:
210:
209:
189:Internet portal
187:
180:
115:
112:
109:
106:
105:
61:
12:
11:
5:
787:
785:
777:
776:
771:
766:
761:
756:
751:
746:
741:
736:
726:
725:
707:
704:
703:
702:
701:
700:
690:Camilo Sanchez
661:Camilo Sanchez
652:
651:
650:
649:
648:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
627:Camilo Sanchez
573:Camilo Sanchez
555:
541:Camilo Sanchez
537:
527:Camilo Sanchez
498:Camilo Sanchez
460:Camilo Sanchez
450:
447:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
409:Camilo Sanchez
361:Camilo Sanchez
321:Camilo Sanchez
295:
294:
293:
292:
282:Camilo Sanchez
259:
256:
240:
237:
234:
233:
230:
229:
226:
225:
223:
206:the discussion
193:
192:
176:
164:
163:
158:
146:
145:
142:
141:
132:
122:
121:
119:
102:the discussion
80:
68:
67:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
786:
775:
772:
770:
767:
765:
762:
760:
757:
755:
752:
750:
747:
745:
742:
740:
737:
735:
732:
731:
729:
722:
721:
717:
713:
705:
699:
695:
691:
687:
686:
685:
681:
677:
673:
672:
671:
670:
666:
662:
657:
656:this template
636:
632:
628:
624:
623:
622:
618:
614:
613:Best Dog Ever
610:
606:
602:
598:
594:
590:
589:
584:
583:
582:
578:
574:
570:
569:
568:
564:
560:
559:Best Dog Ever
556:
552:
551:
550:
546:
542:
538:
536:
532:
528:
524:
523:
522:
518:
514:
509:
508:
507:
503:
499:
495:
491:
487:
486:
485:
481:
477:
472:
471:
470:
469:
465:
461:
456:
448:
446:
445:
441:
437:
424:
420:
416:
410:
405:
404:
403:
399:
395:
394:83.226.255.86
391:
390:Best Dog Ever
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
367:
362:
357:
356:
355:
351:
347:
346:83.226.255.86
343:
340:
337:
334:
331:
328:
322:
317:of the logo (
316:
312:
311:
310:
306:
302:
297:
296:
291:
287:
283:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
270:
266:
257:
255:
254:
250:
246:
238:
224:
207:
203:
199:
198:
190:
184:
179:
177:
174:
170:
169:
165:
162:
159:
156:
152:
139:
138:
128:
124:
123:
120:
103:
99:
95:
91:
87:
86:
81:
78:
74:
73:
69:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
709:
653:
600:
586:
452:
433:
369:
261:
242:
195:
135:
83:
40:WikiProjects
29:
654:By the way
728:Categories
64:Networking
496:Thanks --
492:and CNN.
378:Chmod 777
265:Chmod 777
107:Computing
94:computing
90:computers
59:Computing
712:Jethrogb
245:SasiSasi
211:Internet
202:Internet
161:Internet
30:template
601:virtual
494:Example
315:creator
591:. The
96:, and
36:scale.
595:is a
449:Image
386:Fram
239:Notes
28:This
716:talk
694:talk
680:talk
676:Fram
665:talk
631:talk
617:talk
593:PSTN
577:talk
563:talk
545:talk
531:talk
517:talk
513:Fram
502:talk
480:talk
476:Fram
464:talk
455:User
440:talk
419:talk
398:talk
388:and
382:W163
350:talk
342:2014
339:2011
336:2010
333:2010
330:2010
327:2010
305:talk
286:talk
269:talk
258:Logo
249:talk
490:PBS
370:not
730::
718:)
696:)
682:)
667:)
659:--
633:)
619:)
603:.
579:)
565:)
547:)
533:)
519:)
504:)
482:)
466:)
458:--
442:)
421:)
400:)
384:,
380:,
352:)
344:.
307:)
288:)
271:)
251:)
92:,
62::
714:(
692:(
678:(
663:(
629:(
615:(
575:(
561:(
543:(
529:(
515:(
500:(
478:(
462:(
438:(
417:(
411::
407:@
396:(
363::
359:@
348:(
323::
319:@
303:(
299:-
284:(
267:(
247:(
140:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
