22:
71:
53:
81:
163:
It might be something worth investigating. Scullion as a CLP member used to (and I thought still does) vote en bloc with the Nats in the Senate, and was the leader of the Nats in the Senate, until was deposed as leader of the
Nationals by Joyce, after Joyce got the third of five votes required from
211:
A few moderate
Liberals won't necessarily always vote with their party, but they don't cease to be Opposition members as a result. The Nationals sit alongside the Greens? Well they also sit alongside the Liberals. There is nothing about their seating position that unambiguously marks them as
164:
the new Nat in the Senate to undertake the coup. It wasn't revealed to the party until after it took place, but
Scullion remains deputy leader of the National Party itself. Being a shadow minister doesn't stop someone from being classed as 'a crossbencher' I wouldn't have thought.
197:. Yes the Nats are still in a coalition with the Libs, but they will no longer necessarily be voting with them, and sit next to the Greens on the crossbenches, with the whole "Now the upper house Nationals might vote against the coalition as a block, Senator Joyce said." bit.
178:
The prominence of
National Party MPs and Senators (of which I was including Scullion) in the shadow ministry indicates that the coalition remains in tact. That being the case, National Party Senators ought to be considered part of the Opposition, not the cross-bench.
246:
Agreed, they are not crossbenchers at this juncture. (One gets in all sorts of tangles in state parliaments with that, but the federal is fairly clearcut I would have thought.)
275:
280:
285:
110:
97:
58:
232:
Bush shep is obviously correct. On the criterion offered, Nick
Minchin (leader of the Opposition in the Senate) is a cross-bencher.
33:
39:
247:
237:
202:
169:
223:
184:
153:
106:
148:
How can the Nats be considered cross-benchers when
Scullion is a member of the shadow ministry?
233:
217:
86:
198:
165:
250:
241:
227:
219:
206:
188:
180:
173:
157:
149:
269:
194:
70:
52:
76:
102:
15:
212:
cross-benchers. Further, the aforementioned
Scullion sits
101:, which aims to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
109:. If you would like to participate, visit the
8:
47:
49:
119:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Australia
21:
19:
7:
193:Read all the refs at somewhere like
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
276:Template-Class Australia articles
281:NA-importance Australia articles
79:
69:
51:
20:
286:WikiProject Australia articles
122:Template:WikiProject Australia
1:
251:11:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
242:07:44, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
228:19:06, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
207:02:58, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
189:21:59, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
174:04:45, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
158:23:50, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
302:
64:
46:
107:Australia-related topics
95:is within the scope of
144:Nats as crossbenchers
98:WikiProject Australia
125:Australia articles
34:content assessment
141:
140:
137:
136:
133:
132:
93:Senate crossbench
293:
127:
126:
123:
120:
117:
89:
87:Australia portal
84:
83:
82:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
25:
24:
23:
16:
301:
300:
296:
295:
294:
292:
291:
290:
266:
265:
146:
124:
121:
118:
115:
114:
85:
80:
78:
12:
11:
5:
299:
297:
289:
288:
283:
278:
268:
267:
264:
263:
262:
261:
260:
259:
258:
257:
256:
255:
254:
253:
216:the Liberals.
145:
142:
139:
138:
135:
134:
131:
130:
128:
91:
90:
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
298:
287:
284:
282:
279:
277:
274:
273:
271:
252:
249:
245:
244:
243:
239:
235:
231:
230:
229:
225:
221:
218:
215:
210:
209:
208:
204:
200:
196:
195:Barnaby Joyce
192:
191:
190:
186:
182:
177:
176:
175:
171:
167:
162:
161:
160:
159:
155:
151:
143:
129:
112:
108:
104:
100:
99:
94:
88:
77:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
248:Orderinchaos
213:
147:
111:project page
96:
92:
40:WikiProjects
29:
270:Categories
214:in amongst
220:Bush shep
199:Timeshift
181:Bush shep
166:Timeshift
150:Bush shep
116:Australia
103:Australia
59:Australia
30:template
36:scale.
28:This
238:talk
224:talk
203:talk
185:talk
170:talk
154:talk
105:and
272::
240:)
234:JQ
226:)
205:)
187:)
172:)
156:)
236:(
222:(
201:(
183:(
168:(
152:(
113:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.