554:. If they're wrong, please explicate the problem (and preferably also help fix it). I don't see how my administrator privileges come into this picture at all - this is a content dispute and in my latest edit I used a user tool to revert, not an admin tool. You've engaged in these tendentious accusations about my behaviour in the past, and I'll repeat what I've told you previously - do bring forth a formal complaint if you think you have a case, otherwise stop digging yourself into a hole of repetitive disruptive behavior. --
82:
64:
33:
242:
258:
225:
163:
131:
537:
I most certainly have not ignored anyone's opinion. If you look closely, I didn't even remove the
Chetniks from the template! His explanation boils down to editorial discretion - comparison to other navboxes, and navboxes are usually based on that. If by any chance these other navboxes were defined
362:
You've reverted again, disregarding my cleanly subgrouped version that I mentioned above without explaining why they shouldn't be subgrouped. Your overall position is still unsupported by anything other than editorial discretion. Since you've been topic-banned from this area in the past, I hardly
592:
If you want to make such claims, you should start over there, not here - it doesn't make any sense for a navbox to conflict with sourced article summaries. And that's just a procedural point of view - on a content point of view, my reading of the article is that there's no meaningful way to
496:
During World War II, the
Chetniks were an anti-Axis movement in their long-range goals and engaged in marginal resistance activities for limited periods, but also carried out almost throughout the war a tactical or selective collaboration with the
249:
145:
232:
141:
265:
149:
538:
somehow through some more elaborate process, such as an
Arbitration Committee decision or something, this needs to be explained. I did not attack FkpCascais - I've commented on the specific contributor's
499:
and that's also not tagged as a problem. So I think it's very much fair to require the description of
Chetniks as a resistance movement to have these limited periods enumerated in order to avoid
790:
412:
I left the subgrouped version prefered by Joy (ok?) and removed the years, since they were a clear attempt to ignore all resistance activities made (and sourced) by
Chetniks until 1945.
780:
311:
I see we have a bit of haggling over the meaning of the word "controversial"... I'm at least going to split it into two navbox subgroups, because they weren't a common resistance. --
795:
340:
Agree with
Antidiscriminator. The same situation is found in the collaboration template where all groups are mentioned without necessarily having anything to do with one another.
785:
175:
775:
737:
This template should be split into "Senior
Chetnik commanders in Yugoslavia during World War II" and "Senior Partisan commanders in Yugoslavia during World War II".
617:
The sources classify
Chetniks as resistance. "Knowledge (XXG) article does not say so" is not valid argument in this discussion. Do you want me to present sources?--
746:
718:
692:
674:
640:
626:
612:
587:
563:
512:
463:
421:
407:
372:
349:
335:
320:
800:
760:
765:
805:
593:
categorize the group as resistance on par with the rest after they got all tied up with the
Italians. Note also the dating in the listing of Italy in
326:
No. They don't need to be within the common resistance to be included in this template, although they did struggle together against Axis initially. --
170:
136:
770:
100:
and its nations. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
179:
92:
69:
546:
is perfectly relevant in this discussion, because this is a fairly typical contentious topic in that topic area. As I explained
44:
17:
631:
I see no reason why we shouldn't dispense with the year/s in the template and just leave the (marginal resistance) there.
454:
and it's not tagged as a problem. So describing the
Chetniks as a resistance movement after 1941 is dubious at best. --
622:
403:
331:
398:
This is not the first time I see that your edits are not appropriate for somebody with administrator privileges. --
50:
174:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
742:
688:
636:
618:
399:
327:
597:
583:
417:
345:
574:
Yes, that is one source saying that regarding their collaboration activities, however, if you check
706:
543:
296:
Removed MISQUOTED references copy-pasted from another template, and deleted controversial entries.
500:
738:
684:
632:
81:
63:
387:
579:
413:
341:
96:, a collaborative effort to improve the Knowledge (XXG) coverage of articles related to
551:
447:
241:
754:
714:
680:
670:
608:
559:
508:
459:
368:
316:
363:
think you're the person to be engaging in a slow-moving revert war on the matter. --
88:
Template:Senior commanders in resistance movement in Yugoslavia during World War II
257:
97:
705:, they don't exist in a vacuum separate from the articles they link to. Read
393:
You even entered wrong assertions into this infobox (only 1941 for Chetniks).
290:
Putting Partisans and Chetniks side by side, with no elaboration, is biased.
224:
710:
666:
604:
578:
article you can see sourced resistance activities all the way till 1945.
575:
555:
504:
491:
455:
364:
312:
452:
However, after 1941, the Chetniks adopted a "policy of collaboration."
162:
130:
26:
18:
Template talk:Resistance in Yugoslavia during Second World War
542:, not anything about their person. Their recent topic ban in
383:
It is not true that FkpCascais did not explain his position.
256:
240:
223:
665:
I wonder if Ad or FC will in turn complain about that. --
548:
in the edit summary of the edit where I added the years
547:
306:
298:
206:
791:Template-Class European military history articles
781:Template-Class Balkan military history articles
380:It is you who ignored opinion of other editors.
43:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
796:European military history task force articles
8:
188:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
786:Balkan military history task force articles
377:No Joy. Everything you wrote is incorrect:
203:
125:
58:
168:This template is within the scope of the
776:Template-Class military history articles
494:article and the lead section there says
390:when you wrote comment about FkpCascais.
127:
60:
178:. To use this banner, please see the
106:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Yugoslavia
191:Template:WikiProject Military history
32:
30:
7:
801:Template-Class World War II articles
302:10 March 2012 Jean-Jacques Georges:
250:European military history task force
49:It is of interest to the following
761:Template-Class Yugoslavia articles
233:Balkan military history task force
25:
766:NA-importance Yugoslavia articles
806:World War II task force articles
161:
129:
80:
62:
31:
771:WikiProject Yugoslavia articles
109:Template:WikiProject Yugoslavia
1:
550:- the years match sources at
321:09:50, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
171:Military history WikiProject
294:17 February 2012 DIREKTOR:
822:
747:03:00, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
719:10:12, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
693:10:25, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
675:10:13, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
641:23:27, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
627:23:01, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
613:22:36, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
588:18:55, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
564:18:51, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
513:18:59, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
464:18:53, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
422:18:46, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
408:14:44, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
373:13:33, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
350:14:08, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
336:13:46, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
264:
248:
231:
202:
194:military history articles
156:
75:
57:
703:Knowledge (XXG) articles
701:Navigational boxes link
304:Undid controversial edit
266:World War II task force
207:Associated task forces:
90:is within the scope of
679:Ad did, but it was at
261:
245:
228:
93:WikiProject Yugoslavia
260:
244:
227:
446:The lead section of
743:click to talk to me
112:Yugoslavia articles
262:
246:
229:
176:list of open tasks
45:content assessment
619:Antidiskriminator
400:Antidiskriminator
328:Antidiskriminator
283:
282:
279:
278:
275:
274:
271:
270:
180:full instructions
124:
123:
120:
119:
16:(Redirected from
813:
602:
596:
450:says literally:
235:(c. 500–present)
214:
204:
196:
195:
192:
189:
186:
185:Military history
165:
158:
157:
152:
137:Military history
133:
126:
114:
113:
110:
107:
104:
84:
77:
76:
66:
59:
36:
35:
34:
27:
21:
821:
820:
816:
815:
814:
812:
811:
810:
751:
750:
735:
600:
594:
288:
212:
193:
190:
187:
184:
183:
139:
111:
108:
105:
102:
101:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
819:
817:
809:
808:
803:
798:
793:
788:
783:
778:
773:
768:
763:
753:
752:
734:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
724:
723:
722:
721:
699:
698:
697:
696:
695:
652:
651:
650:
649:
648:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
552:Yugoslav Front
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:
515:
490:I checked the
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
448:Yugoslav Front
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
396:
395:
394:
391:
384:
381:
355:
354:
353:
352:
309:
308:
300:
287:
284:
281:
280:
277:
276:
273:
272:
269:
268:
263:
253:
252:
247:
237:
236:
230:
220:
219:
217:
215:
209:
208:
200:
199:
197:
166:
154:
153:
134:
122:
121:
118:
117:
115:
85:
73:
72:
67:
55:
54:
48:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
818:
807:
804:
802:
799:
797:
794:
792:
789:
787:
784:
782:
779:
777:
774:
772:
769:
767:
764:
762:
759:
758:
756:
749:
748:
744:
740:
732:
720:
716:
712:
708:
704:
700:
694:
690:
686:
682:
681:Talk:Chetniks
678:
677:
676:
672:
668:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
658:
657:
656:
655:
654:
653:
642:
638:
634:
630:
629:
628:
624:
620:
616:
615:
614:
610:
606:
599:
591:
590:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
565:
561:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
536:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
493:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
423:
419:
415:
411:
410:
409:
405:
401:
397:
392:
389:
386:You violated
385:
382:
379:
378:
376:
375:
374:
370:
366:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
351:
347:
343:
339:
338:
337:
333:
329:
325:
324:
323:
322:
318:
314:
307:
305:
301:
299:
297:
293:
292:
291:
286:controversial
285:
267:
259:
255:
254:
251:
243:
239:
238:
234:
226:
222:
221:
218:
216:
211:
210:
205:
201:
198:
181:
177:
173:
172:
167:
164:
160:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
135:
132:
128:
116:
99:
95:
94:
89:
86:
83:
79:
78:
74:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
42:
38:
29:
28:
19:
739:Peacemaker67
736:
702:
689:send... over
685:Peacemaker67
637:send... over
633:Peacemaker67
598:World War II
539:
495:
451:
310:
303:
295:
289:
169:
150:World War II
91:
87:
51:WikiProjects
40:
497:occupation.
755:Categories
580:FkpCascais
414:FkpCascais
342:FkpCascais
103:Yugoslavia
98:Yugoslavia
70:Yugoslavia
707:WP:NAVBOX
544:WP:ARBMAC
576:Chetniks
501:WP:UNDUE
492:Chetniks
146:European
41:template
540:actions
388:wp:npa
142:Balkan
47:scale.
733:Split
39:This
715:talk
711:Joy
709:. --
683:...
671:talk
667:Joy
623:talk
609:talk
605:Joy
603:. --
584:talk
560:talk
556:Joy
509:talk
505:Joy
503:. --
460:talk
456:Joy
418:talk
404:talk
369:talk
365:Joy
346:talk
332:talk
317:talk
313:Joy
757::
745:)
717:)
691:)
673:)
639:)
625:)
611:)
601:}}
595:{{
586:)
562:)
511:)
462:)
420:)
406:)
371:)
348:)
334:)
319:)
213:/
148:/
144:/
140::
741:(
713:(
687:(
669:(
635:(
621:(
607:(
582:(
558:(
507:(
458:(
416:(
402:(
367:(
344:(
330:(
315:(
182:.
53::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
