Template talk:Unblock - Knowledge (XXG)

3721:, which is a permanent, clearly visible modification that changes the box background color, the text and the template's syntax. The "on hold" modification can only be undone by manually removing the text "on hold". It is meant as a last step before unblocking and may even be interpreted to discourage further input by the affected user for a while. The proposed "idletimestamp" parameter is a temporary, invisible measure that practically undoes itself in the moment any later edit is made to the page. The slightest typography fix or any kind of response, no matter how badly formatted, causes the unblock appeal to re-appear at 55: 137: 3405: 4418: 4318: 4083: 3842: 3491: 3306: 3399: 2407:

that they have the same color as every other template. In other words: I have to look at every template to see the difference in color and wording, rather then seeing this from just scrolling past as fast as possible. This is quite monitor specific as well - my left monitors color settings show a fair amount of difference, but my right screen shows little difference.

1262:. This means that if a user accidentally puts the request for unblock on their user page instead of their talk page, the request will silently fail—admins will not be alerted to the request. This should be changed: either the template should work if placed on the user page, or the template should display a warning if placed in the wrong namespace. 4383: 4257: 4193: 4137: 3936: 3547: 3455: 3358: 2564: 1473: 1284: 1202: 987: 4505: 1029: 21: 471:

consensus before making that change. Controversial actions can and should be discussed in appropriate venues. At this point, I see no consensus change the template, and I should hope it's clear that we disagree with each other rather strongly. If you'd like to bring in some fresh voices, feel free to make a post to

2406:

To be honest, i find myself agreeing with the sentiment that jpGordon states. One of the advantages of the blue unblock template was that it stood out clearly among the handled templates. Sometimes people add unblock templates in the middle of a messy page, which makes finding them more difficult now

2139:

Looks also good. But on reflection, doesn't this approach make a separate "Request accepted" template superfluous? Perhaps if we used "unblock|unblock-reason=text" to result in output similar to your design for "Request accepted|1=reason", but retaining the unblock request text (if any)? We would get

2055:

Looks good. But shouldn't "a user may not in fact be blocked, or their block may be expired" be rephrased as "you may not in fact be blocked, or your block may be expired"? The rest of the paragraph also directly addresses the blocked user. Also, "Note that misuse of the unblock request procedure may

1793:

or something like that. Regarding the parameter name, it's an interesting juggling acts. All the block templates talk say to use {{unblock | your reason here}}; I don't think expecting the prospective unblockee to say {{unblock | 1=your reason here}} is desirable, given the total obscurity of that 1=

1352:

The caveat there is that the request could be posted by a third party on the user's userpage if the talk page is protected for some reason. If E-mail is disabled and the talk page is protected, this would actually be the only other way that a user could request unblocking, and even then would require

1910:

Looks generally good to me. One thing I don't like, though, is the pink color background. Yes, it matches the you-are-now-blocked messages, but a different color makes it easier to distinguish from other block notices and I simply don't like staring at pink. Blue makes my eyes hurt less. Do you have

1088:

I have not found a guideline that says this. IMHO the request and the block notice should never be separated. This implies that if the block notice is removed or archived during the block then the request should go with it, whereas if the block notice is kept after the block expires then the request

250:

It is inappropriate to warn that there are undocumented rules for using a template? Most templates have Usage instructions or documentation on the template page. Usage of this seems obvious from the template message, but isn't. A recent edit message on the template confirms that people don't know

1690:

Why aren't we hiding the "administrator" part of the unblock notice? Seems it would reduce a lot of the common occurrence of blocked editors attempting (generally out of ignorance, rather than bad behavior) to unblock (etc) themselves. Then we could also make the admin-only part uglier, like have a

817:

Does anyone else think templates like this or ((help)) are a bit complicated for new users to correctly use? Would an idea be to set it up as a link that says "Click here to request ot be unblocked" and that link would take them to a form field where they could type their reason and click submit.

3659:

Oh! Sorry for the delayed response. I must admit, I'm not immediately clear on how this would work technically, but trust ToBeFree on that point. I really like the idea. Most of my work is monitoring CAT:RFU and anything we can do to increase the signal there is great and I'm very much in favour.

3003:

code is pasted to the admion's talk page. Actually, your code is confusing, and is even displayed the same in preview. So I fail to see the benefit of this change, if it even is a change; I only see you escape some pipe characters, whcih is completely unnecessary. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

1750:

Does look better. I wonder if there's a way to lose the "if your reason contains a URL with an = in it" language; perhaps use a named parameter instead, and just always have it say {{unblock|reason=your reason here}}. Would that be more confusing, I wonder, to the users who are baffled by the bad

1230:

I frequently see unblock requests from editors (or socks) protesting their innocence, or claiming that the checkuser results are wrong, or offering some esotetic explaination as to why the checkuser would see that this account and 12 others were run by the same IP, and so on. I'm thinking that it

1036:

I'm going to decline your request, because that sentence is in the "Administrators only" section reminding them that they are not allowed to unblock themselves; it's not meant for general readers. I agree with the previous sections on this talk page that this template needs a redesign, and this

470:

Was used by one admin in one situation, so obviously it's an all-encompassing policy? Right. I'll say it more clearly: there are very few rules, if any, to document, because it's largely left to admin discretion and community consensus -- that could be changed, but I'd want to see some community

852:

Hey, I noticed today, that the RDNS link in the unblock template no longer works, unless you pay for it. Is there a *free* alternative out there, that anyone knows of? (I just use host, but, I don't think windows has that). Perhaps, it's time that we re-evaluated using dnsstuff.com links in our

1667:

It seems to be a pretty weird way of keeping a record. Why not add an "accepted" parameter that marks the request as accepted and gets rid of all the admin instructions. Turning it into an unparsed template call is very unintuitive and makes it look like someone has done something wrong.

3226:

What is the "(possibly long) list" you are referring to? A long block log? If an editor has a long block log, I have little doubt that they would know how to interpret it. Although, if it is an IP, I suppose that there could be some confusion. As a side note, the current behavior of

2056:

result in the removal of your talk page editing privileges for the duration of your block" could perhaps be made to sound less bureaucratic: "If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page as long as you are blocked."

3260:

Thanks. I'm not exactly a good template editor, and I was just trying to do things I felt were intuitive. The block-modifying admin shouldn't matter, the template fills that in by itself. Are you good with templates? If so, would you mind if you took the hassle of fixing it?

3238:

Other than this, I don't have any particular objection to the change, but I did notice an error in your code. Special:Blocklist expects a username or IP only without "User:", and since the link is an internal wikilink, it doesn't need to be wrapped in the "plainlinks" class.

2295:

Hm, in practice, the color doesn't work very well; it blends in with the declined unblock requests, and the block notices themselves, which makes it harder to scan a talk page and figure out where exactly the request is. Perhaps a return to the previous blue would be better.

311:

The warning was to prevent others from stumbling into its undocumented traps. If there are few who use the template, then the warning is not disruptive. If there are many who use the template, there are many who are at risk from this template with no usage instructions.

225:

That appears to reflect on the admin in question, more than anything else. I generally do prefer to see warnings before page protection. Either way, the note you added to the template is inappropriate; I suggest you take these matters up with the protecting admin, or via

1784:

Yeah -- I see that the behavior when the reason has an equal sign is the same as when there's no reason provided at all -- the lhs of the equal side is treated as a named argument, and as such the whole reason gets ignored. At the very least, there's no reason to say

612:

There's nothing in the template that says so, but I have never agreed to unblock any user based on another user's request via this template, and I doubt I ever will. Once a block is issued, it's between the blocked user and WP admins to work out the situation. The

1052:

I'm the admin who put that in there. You'd be surprised at how many people try copy and paste {{Request accepted}} into their own talk thinking that it'll automatically unblock them. I'm hoping that there is something that can be written there to reduce that. --

3178:

I've made two changes to the instructions for putting the request on hold. Firstly I've made it clear you need to add the name of the blocking admin, since I've seen this used with the words 'blocking admin' left in. Secondly I've removed the instruction about

3205:. The current wording may be seen as very confusing to a non-Wikipedian, and when a (possibly long) list comes up, it won't be clear to them what to do. Also, this makes it easier for admins to check as well, to see if a short block has already expired. 853:

templates, as they're pages seem to be getting spammier over time, and, who knows what tool will wind up switched to 'pay only', as time goes on. It probably wouldn't be very hard at all to replicate the functionality of these tools, on the toolserver.

2330:

They're not. (Remember, the relative brightness is going to vary significantly from monitor to monitor and setting to setting.) The unblock notice, which is something calling for third-party action, should be really easy to find for that third party.

734:

I've discovered this page. I see some people begging to be unblocked. Please consider if you deny the unblocking that you make a notation but leave it for another adminstrator to review it. After all, if you deny it, that's like killing a person.

355:

Documentation of the existing rules is not rules creep, it just helps people to properly use templates which they discover. The Arbitrators have shown they are arbitrary, and why encourage their interference by scattering undocumented traps?

2377:

I'm not putting looks over functionality, but I am trying to balance them. I think it is a matter of simply getting used to the new color. Since I don't want to make a hasty change again, I'd really like some more input from the RFU folks,

1556:

only by an administrator? Sometimes a non-sysop may wish to delay an imminent rejection of an unblock request in order to comment, maybe a non-sysop version of unblock-on-hold could be added, or unblock-on-hold be modified to allow this?

738:

Please note that I don't condone behavior leading to a block but there seems to be a wide variation of blocking for similar behavior. Some prefer the death penalty. Others prefer 24 hours. Still others prefer a very odd 31 hours.

326:

has a similar mention. Elaborating on the "rules" of the template is rather difficult, because for the most part, it's up to admin discretion and community consensus. Controversial actions are and should be discussed, frequently at

948:. Why shouldn't experienced editors, the same sorts of editors who close non-delete XfD's, decline or discuss in the same way? Very few unblock requests should be granted without discussion with the blocking admin anyway. This 3682:

Thanks for the ping. Yes, this sounds like a good idea. Would this be similar to how a request can be put "on hold" to wait for a comment by the blocking admin(which also removes the request from the active queue, I believe)?

1608:

Of the 8 current unblock requests, only two users are having issues, and their requests contain external links which are known to break some templates. At least that's what it looks like to me. Anyway, the template will work if

1231:

might be worthwhile to add a parameter to this template that would flag an unblock request requiring a Checkuser's expertise. It might be something as simple as {{unblock|1=Your reason here|c}}. The "c" would add the request to

2967:

will just lead the administrator to their own pages, not the ones of the blocked user. My proposal allows for it to be directly copied from the template as displayed on the blocked user's talk page to the administrator's page.

742:

I experienced a bit a kindness by an administrator, Reedy Boy, about a month ago. His kindness really encouraged me to edit more, correct errors and add references, etc. In fact, I'm going to look for a barnstar to give him.

3154:, and we point all blocked users at this template page. To avoid confusing readers, can we hide the template from the top so they first focus on the instructions, and then transclude the template into the documentation with ' 3645:, who appears to be often procedurally declining such cases. This parameter might alleviate the need for procedural inactivity closures in the future, allowing the user to respond months later without clogging the category. 3736:

Adding a visual indication, perhaps a text like "You have been asked a question at the bottom of this page. Please respond to it.", could be part of a future proposal. At the moment, this is purely about categorization.

3779: 1339:

There is one situation in which it may occur - I've seen the rare occasion where one user makes an unblock request on behalf of an other. I don't think, however, that it makes the requested edit above be necessary.

3580:

often contains entries that currently do not require attention from administrators. The "administrative backlog" template is then also displayed incorrectly, without there actually being a noticeable backlog.

366:

Elaborating on the "rules" of the template is rather difficult, because for the most part, it's up to admin discretion and community consensus. Controversial actions are and should be discussed, frequently at

2248:

Looks good. But the "accepted" version dosn't need the text "Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy)", I think.

660:

the request. Most times it doesn't get in my way, but sometimes someone has a very long unblock reason and then this part is extremely burdensome. Does anyone mind if I get rid of the copy-paste text?

409:

template to relay abusive messages to administrators or reposting it after having been denied an unblock by more than one admin." Why should users of this template not be warned of the existing rules?

300:

mentions this template but has no usage instructions, and doesn't even describe rules for protection based on usage of this template. What rules apply to this template? They should all be documented.

3890:

was the correct replacement, but I was wrong; that markup is reserved for computer output. Here, we need the generic monospaced markup. There is no effect on the display. It's just for "correctness".

2306:

Well, it was kind of the goal of the overhaul to make the block templates more unified in appearence. The unblock is brighter then the block- and reviewed boxes, so they should still be easy to spot.

678:

I almost exclusively use the copy/paste text at the bottom of the unblock request when reviewing. I actually find it easier when reviewing multiple requests, and would not like to see it disappear. -

1794:

thing. However, it might be OK to expect them to say {{unblock | reason=your reason here}}; it's just enough less obscure. (I know this stuff is nitpicky, but, given my fondness for hanging around

4060:

OK, now this template is having the same problem as "unblock reviewed" used to: punctuation (a colon, an equals sign) before the template breaks the formatting. I brought this up in January at

2073:

I also added a "handled=1" example to the test page. Could that perhaps be made to look distinct from an unhandled request, such as e.g. by decoloring it and omitting the admin instructions?

944:

reviewing the block and is clear that even if the reviewer happens to be an admin he or she probably won't remove the block but will still discuss it with the blocking admin. See especially

871:

This template is getting a little cumbersome, and I think it would be beneficial to overhaul it—perhaps trimming it down, and making it more "user friendly". Does anybody have any proposals?

375:. A hard rule set would be needless rules creep that would only hamper the process, I think. You've had a single negative experience, please take it up via more appropriate channels. – 4358: 36: 2858: 2419:

If possible: The reviewed template is exceptionally large now due to the added linebreaks. Can that be scaled down a bit, to be more like the previous version in terms of size?

2340:

Not to dismiss your complaint, but if you see so little difference, you really need to adjust your monitor. Having said that, I tried a different shade of blue in the sandbox.

1529:

No, I think it is correct. There is some text after decline= already, which is {{subst:Decline reason here}}. Apologies if I haven't understood your request properly. — Martin

1123:

which I think reflects our current practice. Are there any objections to adding something like the following to the "Notes" section or to some other space within the template?

894:

It requires the user to know how to set a variable. It should be like AfD setup, where you click a link in the template and get a preloaded page saying (enter reason HERE).

649:

Does anyone actually use this text? I never do: I just insert "reviewed" into the existing request and add my reason, rather than cut & paste, and I don't bother with

277:

agree, however, that users should be warned prior to the protection of their talk pages. Again, please take this incident up with the blocking administrator, or via RfC. –

430:-- it's not a policy or a guideline, or even the most common practice. The key issue here is not template documentation, but admin discretion and the protection policy. – 3584:

When an administrator replies to an unblock request without accepting or declining it, there should be a way for the administrator to temporarily remove the request from

2651: 1637:

The instructions for accepting an unblock request seem to be broken. If they're not broken, what is the point of replacing the template with {{tlx|1=unblock|2=reason}}??

395:

I'm discussing this template; my experience is due to the lack of documentation and that lack of documentation is the issue here, not my experience with it not existing.

1751:

behavior that can occur in the absence of the totally opaque "1=" thing? Or less? Can the template macros detect when an equal sign is causing the bad behavior? --

580:

I would say yes, but be careful to make it clear that you're doing so. On the other hand, you'd probably be better off posting your thoughts (and request) at the

1706: 1622: 3408:. The advantage of the latter is that it is licensed under CC0, so the link could be suppressed to avoid confusing readers. This change would also be made to: 2364:

Or perhaps I need to adjust my eyes. But of course I see a difference -- I just don't see it anywhere near as quickly or as easily. Those of us who frequent

75:. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by 1089:

should stay too. Also, an unblock request should of course remain until it has been resolved or withdrawn. So, the text should rather read something like:

1022:

What's with the "you may not unblock your own account"? Everyone knows that only admins can block/unblock, and we rarely see non-humorous blocks on admins.

929:)" on this template to remind admins that they generally need to discuss this with the admin who blocked? All admins were new admins once upon a time. :-) 116: 2927:

BASEPAGENAME is a fail-safe way to ensure the proper name is displayed, even when the code is copied from the template page itself (which happens a lot).

2504:

The sandbox blue looks fine. I'm used to searching for blue when I review unblock things - the current color is far too close to the old declined color.

560: 4064:. The problem appears to be metastasizing. I'm not sure what the source of this is, but I imagine it's the result of the message a blocked user gets? 3751:

Additional note: The re-categorization will even happen if an edit is made and self-reverted. Looking at the timestamp has some interesting benefits.

1701:

I don't know about adding OFFICIAL USE ONLY - I'd have to see what that looked like - but I think that hiding the instructions is a very good idea. —

3782:". Worth it. Thank you very much for the detailed feedback and questions; let's see how this works out in practice. The parameter has been added to 1702: 1618: 2437:

As a RFU patroller, I agree with Excirial and Jpgordon, notably with respect to the colors, but thanks nonetheless for the substantial overhaul!

1232: 2825:

I'm sorry, I've reset it. It was too in-your-face. I am trying to get the wall-of-colors to a minimum, and we already have the blue and green.

3901:, which were installed as a result of the same edit request I made. This is to restore it to the way it was before and undo the confusion, as 3277:

I personally like the idea of showing the block list instead of the block log there. It makes it easier to see whether not a block is active.

1128: 1120: 517:

shows over 200 pages. Shouldn't the reasons given in that template be documented in the template which is likely to trigger that response? (

2655: 786:

This template really needs updating because inclusion of wikilinks and external links in a user's unblock reason request breaks it. Example:

4532: 2424:

Other then that i find the changes to be an improvement over the old template, so no complaints here, just some improvement suggestions.

4042: 1427:), replace...", since it's technically possible to unblock oneself while blocked if one is an admin, but obviously it's not allowed. 1359: 1241: 1215: 1000: 3071: 2979: 2913: 2639: 2214: 1597: 4481: 2368:

are probably the only people who would really care about this; let's not let aesthetic interests override functional concerns. --

2011:

It's kinda...yellow. Not sure yellow-highliter color is the right shade for a request, though. But everything else looks good. --

1975: 1925: 1518: 701: 665: 629: 80: 72: 4123: 3334: 2549: 1389: 1307: 572: 83:}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's 4061: 945: 297: 270: 66: 3180: 2997: 2166:

is an existing template and used a lot, and it is usually substed unlike the other boxes. However, I am going to test with

1721:

The ugliness of this template has bugged me for years, especially the layout. I have prepared an overhauled version in the

460:

is being used. The rules should be documented. Rule creep is the creation of new rules, not listing those which exist. (

2572: 1292: 1259: 4268: 617:

of the blocking admin can certainly be addressed, either via that admin's talk page, or if broader input is needed, via

4170: 4110:

Remove "blocked" from "This blocked user's is asking..." as it is redundant since it mentions it's an unblock request.

3127:

I should reccommend that the option used if administrators disables the user's ability to edit own talk page with this

2902:", which will simply change "BASEPAGENAME" to the current username itself. Click the "edit" button to see what I mean. 1399:

Uhm. I thought that was common sense. Were there any incidents that led to you believing this addition is necessary? --

926: 27: 3422: 1381: 1099: 761:

today. Not all administrators are aware of how to calculate if an IP is within a range. Hope this helps someone out.

111: 2224:

parameter. When the instructions are followed, there will be only one box during all stages of the unblock request.

3599: 3591:

The most user-friendly and simple way to implement this might be an "idletimestamp" parameter. It is filled with {{

3128: 2798: 1882: 103: 4496:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Gaetano_Minale?fbclid=IwAR1hUdAs248Zr1naKwLqEQSWbwNIkaE5NE9yx26utL-slYQjLKnadZoi4pA

4424: 4324: 4089: 3848: 3497: 3312: 4332: 4290: 4216: 4160: 3961: 3592: 2474: 2204: 2160: 1875: 1865: 653: 1881:); they now have a consistent look, but maybe too consistent? I need more eyes and comments. Have a look at the 925:

has: "Administrators should not unblock without attempting to discuss with the blocking administrator (see the

165: 4536: 4336: 4019: 3715: 3523: 2696: 2467: 1937:

It's not pink, it's salmon :) But anyway, personally I think the blue is overused, so any other color will do.

1855: 1722: 1553: 97: 2140:

one box instead of two. The "Request accepted" template could then redirect to "unblock|unblock-reason=text".

205:

because the evasion justification is false; when the block was not reviewed I tried again to get a review and

3235:-blocked by another admin, the page shows the original blocking admin rather than the current blocking admin. 1456:

so that users of the secure server are not needlessly taken to the non-secure server and vice-versa. Thanks.—

4370: 4046: 3880:

This markup was installed as a result of an edit request I made a year ago, to get rid of the obsolete HTML

3786: 3725:. The measure is invisible on the rendered page, with the exception of the category list: The category name 3427: 2870: 2757: 2711: 1258:

This template currently tests to make sure it's on a user talk page, and only if so does it add the page to

2480:, I think readability is better served in the new layout, which also makes it hard to miss by the blockee. 4173:, which doesn't make much sense. Perhaps "block" in that sentence should link to blocking policy instead. 4010: 3999: 3983: 3913: 3535: 1577: 1558: 1502: 1485: 1095: 1017: 818:

As it is now, a user must know how to add a template to the page and add the | to separate their reason.

2416:

The unhandled unblock template should have a color distinct from the other templates for ease of viewing.

1377: 487:, or wherever you like, but other than that, we seem to just be going in circles with no end in sight. – 76: 3417: 3066: 2974: 2962: 2954: 2908: 2634: 1592: 1186: 717: 687: 602: 511: 497: 454: 440: 424: 396: 385: 345: 323: 287: 240: 209: 2748:

I put it somewhere in between our two versions; now it should grab attention but not be eye straining.

4512:

It's unclear what you are asking. I think you are in the wrong place. This is for suggesting edits to

4027: 3151: 1586:

addition broke the template. Peoples' unblock requests are not showing up inside the template itself.

215:

got slapped on with rules which are not in this template. How many other undocumented traps exist? (

4485: 4277: 4203: 4147: 3970: 3949: 3375: 3282: 3188: 3164: 3136: 1970: 1920: 1513: 1344: 85: 2650:

Preferably, yes. They're not all listed in the category (should also be fixed), but they are listed

2382:

That talkpage hasn't been used for over a year. Where would be the best place to get more comments?

1131:

to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

4226: 4118: 3796: 3412: 3346: 2547: 1385: 1305: 1271: 919: 568: 3159: 937: 4366: 3807: 3756: 3742: 3650: 3632: 3614: 2864: 2751: 2705: 1063: 1042: 171: 3668:

who often asks follow-up questions on open unblock requests, where this could be most useful. --

3192: 262: 1380:

tool and the checkuser finding is disputed, this request should be brought to the attention of

772: 335:. A hard rule set would be needless rules creep that would only hamper the process, I think. – 3979: 3928: 3909: 3531: 3228: 3101: 3048: 3016: 2939: 2837: 2813: 2782: 2737: 2670: 2587: 2492: 2394: 2352: 2318: 2278: 2236: 2182: 2127: 2103: 2042: 1999: 1949: 1897: 1822: 1772: 1737: 1673: 1642: 1481: 1432: 1404: 1354: 1263: 1236: 1210: 995: 837: 832:

I agree. This really should be simpler. I suppose we'd need help from the dev's for this. -

585: 372: 332: 4547: 4513: 4328: 3822: 3705: 3688: 3527: 3467: 3438: 3061: 2969: 2903: 2629: 1845: 1587: 1461: 1177: 878: 800: 679: 594: 592:

mailing list. I'd personally probably go with AN/I in that situation, but it's your call. –

489: 432: 403: 377: 337: 279: 232: 201:

section at the top of this Talk page. I discovered this undocumented template, tried it on

167: 136: 121: 60: 2365: 1109: 969:

Could some administrator include a link to Swedish Knowledge (XXG), using . Best regards

622: 227: 113: 4555: 4521: 3673: 3366: 3278: 3184: 3132: 1965: 1915: 1508: 1341: 974: 955:

Finally, I agree with the comments above that this is far too complicated for new users.--

698: 662: 626: 2959:, so it should still be safe. Besides, copying and pasting from there when it still says 618: 589: 581: 484: 480: 476: 472: 368: 328: 186:

Apparently there are unwritten rules for usage of this. They should be written down. (

4397: 4113: 3560: 3342: 3244: 2538: 2440: 2252: 2143: 2076: 2059: 1660: 1536: 1329: 1296: 1267: 1156: 1138: 744: 564: 265:. All else aside, the circumstances where protection can be used to stop unblock abuse 3605:, a subcategory ("Unblock requests awaiting response from the blocked user") replaces 4230: 4174: 4065: 3803: 3752: 3738: 3646: 3628: 3610: 3265: 3213: 2600: 2523: 2505: 2425: 2369: 2332: 2297: 2012: 1799: 1752: 1692: 1056: 1038: 859: 714: 588:), as that'll probably get wider and quicker attention. If you prefer email, try the 90: 114: 3155: 3092: 3039: 3007: 2930: 2828: 2804: 2770: 2725: 2661: 2578: 2483: 2385: 2343: 2309: 2269: 2227: 2173: 2170:, and we could indeed get rid of {Request accepted}, and even {unblock|handled=1}. 2118: 2094: 2033: 1990: 1940: 1888: 1813: 1763: 1728: 1669: 1638: 1428: 1400: 896: 833: 820: 766: 518: 461: 411: 357: 313: 302: 252: 216: 187: 4546:

You are confused, this is a Knowledge (XXG) talk page to discuss improvements to

3818: 3698: 3684: 3663: 3463: 3434: 1457: 202: 3404: 2030:

OK, I toned down on the yellow... back to 'salmon', but then halfway to white.

197:

Instructions are needed for this template, either on the template page or in a

4551: 4517: 3669: 3642: 3081:

OK, done. Next time if you want to propose some code, put the code in between

970: 4359:

Knowledge (XXG):Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_August_11#Unblock_templates

2859:

Wikipedia_talk:Template_messages/User_talk_namespace#Redesign_block_templates

2769:

Fine with me, but I don't see why a change was necessary in the first place.

2702:

so that the template catches the eye more easily, like it is intended to do.

2522:

Seconded. The blue should stand out enough to recognize the template easily.

4393: 3556: 3518:

This template is causing obsolete HTML lint errors because it uses obsolete

3255: 3240: 3206: 1653: 1532: 1324: 956: 261:

The warning you added to the template was grossly inappropriate, yes -- see

169: 2891:{{subst:Unblock on hold-notification | 1={{BASEPAGENAME}}}}</nowiki: --> 697:

Your prerogative. Would you object to it being hidden behind a drop box?

4559: 4540: 4525: 4489: 4402: 4374: 4293: 4233: 4219: 4177: 4163: 4068: 4050: 3987: 3964: 3917: 3826: 3811: 3760: 3746: 3692: 3677: 3654: 3636: 3618: 3565: 3539: 3475: 3446: 3398: 3385: 3350: 3286: 3272: 3248: 3220: 3168: 3140: 3108: 3076: 3055: 3023: 2984: 2946: 2918: 2877: 2844: 2820: 2788: 2764: 2743: 2718: 2677: 2644: 2603: 2594: 2554: 2530: 2517: 2499: 2449: 2432: 2401: 2372: 2359: 2335: 2325: 2300: 2285: 2261: 2243: 2189: 2152: 2134: 2110: 2085: 2068: 2049: 2015: 2006: 1982: 1956: 1932: 1904: 1829: 1802: 1779: 1755: 1744: 1710: 1695: 1677: 1662: 1646: 1626: 1602: 1565: 1541: 1523: 1489: 1464: 1436: 1408: 1393: 1363: 1347: 1333: 1312: 1275: 1245: 1219: 1193: 1165: 1147: 1103: 1070: 1046: 1004: 978: 959: 902: 882: 861: 841: 826: 807: 775: 747: 719: 708: 692: 672: 636: 607: 521: 502: 464: 445: 414: 390: 360: 350: 316: 305: 292: 255: 245: 219: 190: 119: 3774:

I have implemented and documented the parameter now; there are currently

3625: 891:

It doesn't have the unblock email on the template or within 1 link to it.

873: 854: 4495: 3722: 3606: 3585: 3577: 3036:

template is in place of the blocked user. Right? How does it look now?

1795: 1116: 3595:}} by the administrator. If the "idletimestamp" parameter is equal to 1266:

has been blocked for several days due to this "bug" in the template.--

20: 4531:

Please unblock my transaction from binance account to another wallet

4285: 4211: 4155: 3956: 3780:

Category:Requests_for_unblock_awaiting_response_from_the_blocked_user

2900:{{subst:Unblock on hold-notification|1={{BASEPAGENAME}}}}</tt: --> 2951:

But nothing gets substituted in the unblock template, including the

940:

seems to be a bit undecided on what word to use but often refers to

322:

I've added a note to the template page, then. Please note also that

659:, I just leave a message in such circumstances, and <nowiki: --> 2797:

Please keep experiments in the sandbox (they're all linked in the

1322:

while blocked, and not their userpage, how would this even occur?

251:

what rules I'm referring to. Those rules should be documented. (

1760:

I think 'reason=' would be better. Templates cannot detect '='.

3032:

have a faint idea what you want: to display the username while

2380:

so I'll pose the question there on what is the preferred color.

1961:

I love salmon, but not the color of it :( Maybe grey or peach?

1037:

request is something to keep in mind for when that happens. --

4412: 4312: 4077: 3836: 3727:"Requests for unblock awaiting response from the blocked user" 3485: 3300: 713:

Why not, sounds like a good idea. I'm using the text also. --

172: 130: 49: 15: 3341:) to hide the checkuser links from non-checkusers. Thanks, -- 3231:

is somewhat misleading. If a blocked account, IP or range is

2724:

I undid your change. It makes the template hard on the eyes.

1318:

What is the point of this? If a user can only edit their own

3202:

Hey, I'd like to get consensus for changing the template to

1235:, which could in turn be monitored. Am I overthinking this? 1093:

Do not disattach this unblock request from the block notice.

3973:: Thanks, and also thanks for removing the now-superfluous 1233:

Category:Requests for unblock requiring Checkuser attention

932:

Additionally, why do we say that the review section is for

1291:. The template will now add pages it is transcluded on to 758: 118: 112: 2620:

By any chance, will such an overhaul be performed on the

1084:

Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

789:{{unblock|Putting ] here or here breaks this template.}} 2413:

I would prefer some more contrast between the templates.

4035: 4031: 4023: 4015: 3338: 3203: 2689: 155: 1652:

To keep a record of the successful unblock petition. –

1507:

It says "edit the text" but it should say "add text".

1384:

rather than declined out of hand" - any objections? --

1911:

any concerns to changing back the background colors?

1251:

Template should work if accidentally put on user page

1176:

Add please ] in the interwiki links list. Thank you!

101:. Functionality of the template can be checked using 2115:

I chopped of the bottom half, but I left the color.

952:

language does not appear to be supported by policy.

946:

Knowledge (XXG):Appealing_a_block#What_happens_next

3396:I am proposing replacing the current clock image, 420:You may notice that there's no "guideline" tag on 4357:Please add the relevant TfM templates linking to 4062:Template talk:Unblock reviewed#Can this be fixed? 3833:Template-protected edit request on 4 January 2021 3482:Template-protected edit request on 7 January 2020 2470:meet with eveyone's approval? As for the size of 1376:"If the block was on the basis of the use of the 4074:Template-protected edit request on 2 August 2023 3297:Template-protected edit request on 25 March 2019 3701:, the "on hold" status is created by replacing 3462:since there were no objections after a week. -- 1295:when placed on a userpage or a user talk page. 1125: 3131:, if he proposes an unblock which is abusive. 1787:If your reason contains a URL with a "=" in it 1425:note that you can NOT unblock your own account 4550:. You want a completely different website. -- 3089:tags; that way it won't distort the output. 1791:If your reason contains an "=", e.g. in a URL 8: 3588:, until the user has answered the question. 2989:The idea is that BASEPAGENAME is displayed 2168:{{unblock reviewed|1=reason|accept=reason}} 1153:Done, since there have been no objections. 557:Can you use this on behalf of other users? 3123:Edit own Talk Page Revoking Option Needed! 2200:I simplyfied it further and did away with 4364:{{subst:tfm|Unblock}} </noinclude: --> 3174:Two changes to the 'on hold' instructions 3028:Your code is too confusing, sorry. But I 2575:for a consistent look accross the board. 1691:big noisy "OFFICIAL USE ONLY" section. -- 4472: 4462: 1798:, I see a lot of unblock requests...) -- 95:Any contributor may edit the template's 4309:Related templates nominated for merging 3893:Also, please change two occurrences of 2571:I'll update the remaining templates in 1419:I've changed "can" to "may" in "If you 73:heavily used or highly visible template 3778:user talk pages in the new category, " 3522:tags. I have created a new version in 3146:Hide the template on the template page 3943:, and Happy New Year to You and Yours 3572:Creating an "idletimestamp" parameter 3181:Template:Unblock on hold-notification 911:Notice to Admins and why Admins only? 7: 3872:blocking administrator</samp: --> 2862: 2749: 2703: 2658:. I intend to do them all, in time. 1552:May I ask why a block may be placed 4041:has been nominated for deletion -- 3209:, mind if you take a look at this? 3173: 4454: 4008:FYI, a related response template, 1353:an advocate to post the template. 1115:As an admin frequently patrolling 31: 26:This template was considered for 14: 4169:But now "this user" is a link to 3526:. Please copy that wikitext into 1613:is added before the reason, i.e. 298:Knowledge (XXG):Protection policy 271:Knowledge (XXG):Protection policy 4503: 4446:Description of suggested change: 4416: 4381: 4316: 4255: 4191: 4135: 4081: 3934: 3840: 3545: 3489: 3453: 3403: 3397: 3356: 3304: 2562: 1561:what a crazy random happenstance 1471: 1282: 1200: 1027: 985: 915:Shouldn't we have a notice like 135: 53: 19: 3876:{{mono|blocking administrator}} 2266:Good point. I filtered it out. 965:Link to Swedish Knowledge (XXG) 3817:Thanks for your work on this. 3476:00:57, 23 September 2019 (UTC) 3447:21:07, 13 September 2019 (UTC) 3152:google:Knowledge (XXG) unblock 1987:How about the current yellow? 1633:instructions seem to be broken 1615:{{unblock|1=Your reason here}} 1276:23:44, 30 September 2008 (UTC) 1246:19:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 1220:19:02, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 1194:14:58, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1080:The template presently adds: 1: 4560:11:38, 23 February 2024 (UTC) 4541:11:23, 23 February 2024 (UTC) 4526:15:15, 14 November 2023 (UTC) 4490:15:09, 14 November 2023 (UTC) 4409:Edit request 14 November 2023 3158:' as the dummy user instead ' 3150:This page is the top hit for 3109:20:57, 24 December 2010 (UTC) 3077:20:29, 24 December 2010 (UTC) 3056:22:43, 23 December 2010 (UTC) 3024:22:38, 23 December 2010 (UTC) 2985:21:22, 23 December 2010 (UTC) 2947:14:27, 23 December 2010 (UTC) 2919:08:30, 23 December 2010 (UTC) 2878:05:20, 18 November 2010 (UTC) 2845:12:53, 18 November 2010 (UTC) 2821:12:43, 18 November 2010 (UTC) 2789:04:23, 18 November 2010 (UTC) 2765:04:19, 18 November 2010 (UTC) 2744:04:13, 18 November 2010 (UTC) 2719:04:12, 18 November 2010 (UTC) 2678:01:08, 18 November 2010 (UTC) 2645:00:50, 18 November 2010 (UTC) 2604:03:34, 18 November 2010 (UTC) 2595:21:50, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 2573:Category:User block templates 2555:21:17, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 2531:21:15, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 2518:21:14, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 2500:19:26, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 2450:19:07, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 2433:18:44, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 2402:18:12, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 2373:17:56, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 2360:17:43, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 2336:16:30, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 2326:16:07, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 2301:15:34, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 2286:21:52, 16 November 2010 (UTC) 2262:20:16, 16 November 2010 (UTC) 2244:15:14, 16 November 2010 (UTC) 2190:13:44, 16 November 2010 (UTC) 2153:18:50, 15 November 2010 (UTC) 2135:18:30, 15 November 2010 (UTC) 2111:18:14, 15 November 2010 (UTC) 2091:Good idea, I'll have a look. 2086:18:12, 15 November 2010 (UTC) 2069:18:07, 15 November 2010 (UTC) 2050:18:13, 15 November 2010 (UTC) 2016:17:55, 15 November 2010 (UTC) 2007:17:23, 15 November 2010 (UTC) 1983:16:42, 15 November 2010 (UTC) 1957:00:14, 15 November 2010 (UTC) 1933:23:28, 14 November 2010 (UTC) 1905:20:44, 14 November 2010 (UTC) 1803:05:41, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 1780:03:05, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 1756:00:21, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 1745:16:57, 5 September 2010 (UTC) 1293:Category:Requests for unblock 1260:Category:Requests for unblock 842:00:54, 11 February 2008 (UTC) 827:09:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC) 608:01:21, 13 February 2007 (UTC) 522:02:57, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 503:05:58, 13 February 2007 (UTC) 465:05:06, 13 February 2007 (UTC) 446:21:31, 12 February 2007 (UTC) 415:21:26, 12 February 2007 (UTC) 391:21:09, 12 February 2007 (UTC) 361:19:33, 12 February 2007 (UTC) 351:07:47, 12 February 2007 (UTC) 317:07:38, 12 February 2007 (UTC) 306:07:32, 12 February 2007 (UTC) 293:07:16, 12 February 2007 (UTC) 256:07:05, 12 February 2007 (UTC) 246:06:48, 12 February 2007 (UTC) 191:17:47, 30 December 2006 (UTC) 3895:{{subst:Accept reason here}} 3169:00:03, 16 January 2014 (UTC) 2998:Unblock on hold-notification 1830:17:12, 9 November 2010 (UTC) 1725:. Any comments are welcome. 1409:15:38, 9 December 2008 (UTC) 1394:20:37, 5 December 2008 (UTC) 808:21:34, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 792:So yes, it needs some work. 220:04:04, 29 January 2007 (UTC) 4439:to reactivate your request. 4427:has been answered. Set the 4403:20:55, 11 August 2023 (UTC) 4375:19:52, 11 August 2023 (UTC) 4351:to reactivate your request. 4339:has been answered. Set the 4130:09:25, 2 August 2023 (UTC) 4104:to reactivate your request. 4092:has been answered. Set the 3988:07:37, 6 January 2021 (UTC) 3965:04:55, 6 January 2021 (UTC) 3918:22:03, 4 January 2021 (UTC) 3863:to reactivate your request. 3851:has been answered. Set the 3566:11:21, 7 January 2020 (UTC) 3540:09:48, 7 January 2020 (UTC) 3512:to reactivate your request. 3500:has been answered. Set the 3423:Template:UTRS-unblock-admin 3327:to reactivate your request. 3315:has been answered. Set the 1711:19:15, 22 August 2010 (UTC) 1696:18:30, 22 August 2010 (UTC) 1566:07:44, 6 January 2010 (UTC) 1364:13:16, 2 October 2008 (UTC) 1348:09:52, 2 October 2008 (UTC) 1334:07:36, 2 October 2008 (UTC) 1313:02:19, 1 October 2008 (UTC) 776:18:56, 2 October 2007 (UTC) 748:22:14, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 720:18:48, 29 August 2007 (UTC) 709:04:15, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 399:states the rule "using the 4576: 4294:14:39, 4 August 2023 (UTC) 4234:13:52, 4 August 2023 (UTC) 4220:02:36, 3 August 2023 (UTC) 4178:01:46, 3 August 2023 (UTC) 4164:19:58, 2 August 2023 (UTC) 3885:. At that time I believed 3827:09:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC) 3812:05:25, 16 April 2020 (UTC) 3761:01:48, 16 April 2020 (UTC) 3747:01:45, 16 April 2020 (UTC) 3693:21:18, 15 April 2020 (UTC) 3678:11:43, 15 April 2020 (UTC) 3655:22:56, 12 April 2020 (UTC) 3637:22:51, 12 April 2020 (UTC) 3619:22:50, 12 April 2020 (UTC) 3386:20:16, 25 March 2019 (UTC) 3351:19:49, 25 March 2019 (UTC) 2599:Excellent work, thanks! -- 1808:All the block templates... 1717:Overhaul, comments welcome 1678:22:33, 3 August 2010 (UTC) 1663:18:01, 3 August 2010 (UTC) 1647:17:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC) 1005:20:23, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 979:08:01, 20 April 2008 (UTC) 960:03:24, 17 April 2008 (UTC) 903:21:03, 23 March 2008 (UTC) 883:18:16, 23 March 2008 (UTC) 693:01:56, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 4333:Template:Unblock reviewed 4225:Nice. Now do similar for 4069:15:01, 27 July 2022 (UTC) 4051:02:25, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 3287:16:13, 30 June 2014 (UTC) 3273:15:50, 30 June 2014 (UTC) 3249:15:32, 30 June 2014 (UTC) 3221:15:14, 30 June 2014 (UTC) 3060:Yes. That's what I want. 1841:I finished all messages ( 1789:; more accurate might be 1627:01:10, 31 July 2010 (UTC) 1603:18:22, 30 July 2010 (UTC) 1542:18:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC) 1524:17:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC) 1490:05:45, 14 July 2009 (UTC) 1465:05:25, 14 July 2009 (UTC) 1437:02:39, 24 June 2009 (UTC) 1166:19:04, 18 July 2008 (UTC) 1148:21:59, 11 July 2008 (UTC) 1129:guide to appealing blocks 1121:guide to appealing blocks 888:My 2 biggest gripes are. 862:15:20, 3 March 2008 (UTC) 673:14:44, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 637:14:41, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 4337:Template:Unblock on hold 3524:Template:Unblock/sandbox 3402:, with the very similar 3337:version of the sandbox ( 3333:Please replace with the 3193:11:34, 23 May 2014 (UTC) 3183:, which no long exists. 3141:12:03, 25 May 2011 (UTC) 2466:Can the new blue in the 2215:unblock reviewed/sandbox 1480:Thanks for spotting it. 1104:10:02, 6 June 2008 (UTC) 1071:06:52, 9 June 2009 (UTC) 3428:Template:Unblock-spamun 1582:Jpgordon, I think your 1047:13:43, 7 May 2008 (UTC) 759:http://jodies.de/ipcalc 757:I just added a link to 730:Please display kindness 81:edit template-protected 3731:"Requests for unblock" 3593:subst:CURRENTTIMESTAMP 1133: 934:Administrator use only 507:'What links here' for 89:to add usage notes or 4200:to the word "block". 3905:doesn't belong here. 3418:Template:Unblock-auto 2887:I suggest replacing " 645:"Admin use only" part 586:the incidents subpage 563:comment was added by 397:Template:unblockabuse 324:MediaWiki:Blockedtext 4011:Template:Ipberemoved 3729:is shown instead of 79:, editors may use {{ 34:. The result of the 4269:Unblock-un reviewed 4227:Template:Unblock-un 3976:...</nowiki: --> 3413:Template:Unblock-un 1372:Suggested addition: 1226:Checkuser Attention 182:Instructions needed 4371:Herrscher of Wikis 4363:<noinclude: --> 4171:wp:Blocking policy 3899:Accept reason here 3777: 3392:Change clock image 2853:Related discussion 2537:Looks fine to me. 1810:? There are more? 1442:Secure link change 1076:Removing a request 803: 4479: 4478: 4443: 4442: 4401: 4355: 4354: 4296: 4222: 4166: 4108: 4107: 3967: 3926: 3888:...</samp: --> 3867: 3866: 3775: 3600:REVISIONTIMESTAMP 3564: 3516: 3515: 3383: 3331: 3330: 3229:Special:Blocklist 2876: 2763: 2717: 2690:slightly modified 2448: 2260: 2151: 2084: 2067: 1540: 1362: 1264:User:Citation bot 1256:{{editprotected}} 1244: 1218: 1191: 1183: 1164: 1146: 1119:, I've written a 1096:Guido den Broeder 1069: 1003: 799: 690: 582:admin noticeboard 576: 553:Unblocking others 178: 177: 128: 127: 48: 47: 4567: 4548:Template:Unblock 4514:Template:Unblock 4511: 4507: 4506: 4455: 4434: 4430: 4420: 4419: 4413: 4391: 4389: 4385: 4384: 4365: 4346: 4342: 4329:Template:Unblock 4320: 4319: 4313: 4292: 4288: 4280: 4273: 4267: 4263: 4259: 4258: 4218: 4214: 4206: 4199: 4195: 4194: 4162: 4158: 4150: 4143: 4139: 4138: 4129: 4128: 4126: 4121: 4116: 4099: 4095: 4085: 4084: 4078: 4040: 4039: 4004: 3998: 3977: 3963: 3959: 3952: 3942: 3938: 3937: 3932: 3924: 3904: 3900: 3896: 3889: 3884: 3877: 3873: 3858: 3854: 3844: 3843: 3837: 3801: 3795: 3791: 3785: 3720: 3714: 3710: 3704: 3667: 3604: 3598: 3554: 3549: 3548: 3528:Template:Unblock 3521: 3507: 3503: 3493: 3492: 3486: 3472: 3461: 3457: 3456: 3443: 3407: 3401: 3384: 3380: 3373: 3371: 3360: 3359: 3322: 3318: 3308: 3307: 3301: 3270: 3259: 3218: 3167: 3107: 3104: 3088: 3084: 3074: 3069: 3064: 3054: 3051: 3022: 3019: 3002: 2996: 2982: 2977: 2972: 2966: 2958: 2945: 2942: 2916: 2911: 2906: 2873: 2867: 2843: 2840: 2819: 2816: 2785: 2779: 2778: 2760: 2754: 2740: 2734: 2733: 2714: 2708: 2701: 2695: 2676: 2673: 2642: 2637: 2632: 2593: 2590: 2570: 2566: 2565: 2545: 2528: 2498: 2495: 2479: 2475:unblock reviewed 2473: 2447: 2445: 2438: 2430: 2400: 2397: 2358: 2355: 2324: 2321: 2284: 2281: 2259: 2257: 2250: 2242: 2239: 2223: 2219: 2213: 2209: 2205:Request accepted 2203: 2188: 2185: 2169: 2165: 2161:Request accepted 2159: 2150: 2148: 2141: 2133: 2130: 2109: 2106: 2083: 2081: 2074: 2066: 2064: 2057: 2048: 2045: 2005: 2002: 1981: 1978: 1973: 1968: 1955: 1952: 1931: 1928: 1923: 1918: 1903: 1900: 1880: 1876:request accepted 1874: 1870: 1866:unblock reviewed 1864: 1860: 1854: 1850: 1844: 1828: 1825: 1778: 1775: 1743: 1740: 1658: 1616: 1612: 1600: 1595: 1590: 1581: 1563: 1530: 1521: 1516: 1511: 1506: 1479: 1475: 1474: 1358: 1303: 1290: 1286: 1285: 1257: 1240: 1214: 1208: 1204: 1203: 1190: 1187: 1182: 1179: 1163: 1161: 1154: 1145: 1143: 1136: 1127:Please read our 1068: 1066: 1060: 1054: 1035: 1031: 1030: 1021: 999: 993: 989: 988: 924: 918: 899: 881: 857: 823: 806: 798: 769: 765: 706: 688: 685: 682: 670: 658: 654:Request accepted 652: 634: 606: 599: 558: 516: 510: 501: 494: 459: 453: 450:But the rule in 444: 437: 429: 423: 408: 402: 389: 382: 349: 342: 291: 284: 244: 237: 214: 208: 173: 139: 131: 122: 71:because it is a 61:Template:Unblock 57: 56: 50: 33: 23: 16: 4575: 4574: 4570: 4569: 4568: 4566: 4565: 4564: 4504: 4502: 4498:chiedo sblocco 4475: 4474: 4465: 4464: 4432: 4428: 4417: 4411: 4382: 4380: 4377: 4362: 4344: 4340: 4317: 4311: 4286: 4278: 4271: 4265: 4256: 4254: 4212: 4204: 4192: 4190: 4156: 4148: 4136: 4134: 4124: 4119: 4114: 4112: 4111: 4097: 4093: 4082: 4076: 4058: 4013: 4009: 4006: 4002: 3996: 3975:<nowiki: --> 3974: 3971:Paine Ellsworth 3957: 3950: 3935: 3933: 3923: 3902: 3898: 3894: 3886: 3883:...</tt: --> 3881: 3875: 3870: 3856: 3852: 3841: 3835: 3799: 3793: 3789: 3783: 3718: 3716:unblock on hold 3712: 3708: 3702: 3661: 3624:Courtesy ping: 3602: 3596: 3574: 3546: 3519: 3505: 3501: 3490: 3484: 3468: 3454: 3452: 3439: 3394: 3376: 3367: 3365: 3357: 3320: 3316: 3305: 3299: 3266: 3253: 3214: 3200: 3198:Modify template 3176: 3165:John Vandenberg 3163: 3148: 3125: 3102: 3090: 3086: 3082: 3072: 3067: 3062: 3049: 3037: 3017: 3005: 3000: 2994: 2980: 2975: 2970: 2960: 2952: 2940: 2928: 2914: 2909: 2904: 2890:<nowiki: --> 2885: 2871: 2865: 2855: 2838: 2826: 2814: 2802: 2783: 2772: 2771: 2758: 2752: 2738: 2727: 2726: 2712: 2706: 2699: 2697:unblock on hold 2693: 2686: 2671: 2659: 2640: 2635: 2630: 2618: 2616:Other templates 2588: 2576: 2563: 2561: 2552: 2539: 2524: 2493: 2481: 2477: 2471: 2441: 2439: 2426: 2395: 2383: 2353: 2341: 2319: 2307: 2279: 2267: 2253: 2251: 2237: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2211: 2207: 2201: 2183: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2157: 2144: 2142: 2128: 2116: 2104: 2092: 2077: 2075: 2060: 2058: 2043: 2031: 2000: 1988: 1976: 1971: 1966: 1962: 1950: 1938: 1926: 1921: 1916: 1912: 1898: 1886: 1878: 1872: 1868: 1862: 1858: 1856:unblock on hold 1852: 1848: 1842: 1823: 1811: 1773: 1761: 1738: 1726: 1719: 1688: 1654: 1635: 1614: 1610: 1598: 1593: 1588: 1575: 1573: 1559: 1550: 1548:Unblock on hold 1519: 1514: 1509: 1500: 1498: 1472: 1470: 1454: 1449: 1444: 1417: 1374: 1310: 1297: 1283: 1281: 1255: 1253: 1228: 1201: 1199: 1188: 1180: 1174: 1157: 1155: 1139: 1137: 1113: 1078: 1064: 1058: 1055: 1028: 1026: 1015: 1013: 986: 984: 967: 927:blocking policy 922: 916: 913: 897: 872: 869: 867:Overhaul needed 855: 850: 821: 815: 804: 796: 784: 767: 763: 755: 732: 702: 683: 680: 666: 656: 650: 647: 630: 595: 593: 559:—The preceding 555: 514: 508: 490: 488: 457: 451: 433: 431: 427: 421: 406: 400: 378: 376: 338: 336: 280: 278: 233: 231: 212: 206: 184: 179: 174: 168: 144: 124: 123: 117: 54: 12: 11: 5: 4573: 4571: 4563: 4562: 4533:117.20.116.225 4529: 4528: 4494: 4477: 4476: 4471: 4469: 4466: 4461: 4459: 4441: 4440: 4421: 4410: 4407: 4406: 4405: 4356: 4353: 4352: 4321: 4310: 4307: 4306: 4305: 4304: 4303: 4302: 4301: 4300: 4299: 4298: 4297: 4279:P.I. Ellsworth 4243: 4242: 4241: 4240: 4239: 4238: 4237: 4236: 4205:P.I. Ellsworth 4183: 4182: 4181: 4180: 4149:P.I. Ellsworth 4106: 4105: 4086: 4075: 4072: 4057: 4054: 4005: 3994: 3993: 3992: 3991: 3990: 3951:P.I. Ellsworth 3869:Please change 3865: 3864: 3845: 3834: 3831: 3830: 3829: 3787:unblock-spamun 3772: 3771: 3770: 3769: 3768: 3767: 3766: 3765: 3764: 3763: 3734: 3639: 3573: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3514: 3513: 3494: 3483: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3470: 3441: 3431: 3430: 3425: 3420: 3415: 3393: 3390: 3389: 3388: 3329: 3328: 3309: 3298: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3236: 3199: 3196: 3175: 3172: 3147: 3144: 3124: 3121: 3120: 3119: 3118: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3113: 3112: 3111: 3026: 2884: 2881: 2854: 2851: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2692:the colors of 2685: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2617: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2558: 2557: 2550: 2534: 2533: 2513: 2510: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2417: 2414: 2408: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2053: 2052: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2018: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1718: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1687: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1634: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1572: 1571:Jpgordon error 1569: 1549: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1497: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1453: 1448: 1446:Please change 1443: 1440: 1416: 1415:Wording change 1413: 1412: 1411: 1373: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1316: 1315: 1308: 1252: 1249: 1227: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1173: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1112: 1107: 1077: 1074: 1050: 1049: 1012: 1009: 1008: 1007: 966: 963: 912: 909: 908: 907: 906: 905: 892: 868: 865: 849: 846: 845: 844: 814: 811: 791: 787: 783: 780: 778: 754: 751: 731: 728: 727: 726: 725: 724: 723: 722: 646: 643: 642: 641: 640: 639: 554: 551: 550: 549: 548: 547: 546: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 539: 538: 537: 536: 535: 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 529: 528: 527: 526: 525: 309: 269:documented at 183: 180: 176: 175: 170: 166: 164: 161: 160: 159: 158: 150: 149: 146: 145: 140: 134: 129: 126: 125: 120: 115: 110: 109: 58: 46: 45: 32:11 August 2023 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4572: 4561: 4557: 4553: 4549: 4545: 4544: 4543: 4542: 4538: 4534: 4527: 4523: 4519: 4515: 4510: 4501: 4500: 4499: 4497: 4492: 4491: 4487: 4483: 4470: 4467: 4463:ORIGINAL_TEXT 4460: 4457: 4456: 4453: 4452: 4448: 4447: 4438: 4435:parameter to 4426: 4422: 4415: 4414: 4408: 4404: 4399: 4395: 4388: 4379: 4378: 4376: 4372: 4368: 4360: 4350: 4347:parameter to 4338: 4334: 4330: 4326: 4322: 4315: 4314: 4308: 4295: 4291: 4289: 4283: 4282: 4281: 4270: 4262: 4253: 4252: 4251: 4250: 4249: 4248: 4247: 4246: 4245: 4244: 4235: 4232: 4228: 4224: 4223: 4221: 4217: 4215: 4209: 4208: 4207: 4198: 4189: 4188: 4187: 4186: 4185: 4184: 4179: 4176: 4172: 4168: 4167: 4165: 4161: 4159: 4153: 4152: 4151: 4142: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4127: 4122: 4117: 4103: 4100:parameter to 4091: 4087: 4080: 4079: 4073: 4071: 4070: 4067: 4063: 4055: 4053: 4052: 4048: 4044: 4043:65.92.246.142 4037: 4033: 4029: 4025: 4021: 4017: 4012: 4001: 3995: 3989: 3985: 3981: 3972: 3969: 3968: 3966: 3962: 3960: 3955: 3954: 3953: 3946: 3941: 3930: 3922: 3921: 3920: 3919: 3915: 3911: 3906: 3903:{{subst:...}} 3891: 3887:<samp: --> 3878: 3871:<samp: --> 3862: 3859:parameter to 3850: 3846: 3839: 3838: 3832: 3828: 3824: 3820: 3816: 3815: 3814: 3813: 3809: 3805: 3798: 3788: 3781: 3762: 3758: 3754: 3750: 3749: 3748: 3744: 3740: 3735: 3732: 3728: 3724: 3717: 3707: 3700: 3696: 3695: 3694: 3690: 3686: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3675: 3671: 3665: 3658: 3657: 3656: 3652: 3648: 3644: 3641:Also pinging 3640: 3638: 3634: 3630: 3627: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3620: 3616: 3612: 3608: 3601: 3594: 3589: 3587: 3582: 3579: 3571: 3567: 3562: 3558: 3552: 3544: 3543: 3542: 3541: 3537: 3533: 3529: 3525: 3511: 3508:parameter to 3499: 3495: 3488: 3487: 3481: 3477: 3473: 3465: 3460: 3451: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3444: 3436: 3429: 3426: 3424: 3421: 3419: 3416: 3414: 3411: 3410: 3409: 3406: 3400: 3391: 3387: 3381: 3379: 3372: 3370: 3363: 3355: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3348: 3344: 3340: 3336: 3326: 3323:parameter to 3314: 3310: 3303: 3302: 3296: 3288: 3284: 3280: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3271: 3269: 3264: 3257: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3246: 3242: 3237: 3234: 3230: 3225: 3224: 3223: 3222: 3219: 3217: 3212: 3208: 3204: 3197: 3195: 3194: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3171: 3170: 3166: 3161: 3157: 3153: 3145: 3143: 3142: 3138: 3134: 3130: 3122: 3110: 3105: 3099: 3098: 3096: 3087:</pre: --> 3080: 3079: 3078: 3075: 3070: 3065: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3052: 3046: 3045: 3043: 3035: 3031: 3027: 3025: 3020: 3014: 3013: 3011: 2999: 2992: 2988: 2987: 2986: 2983: 2978: 2973: 2964: 2956: 2950: 2949: 2948: 2943: 2937: 2936: 2934: 2926: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2917: 2912: 2907: 2901: 2895: 2893: 2882: 2880: 2879: 2875: 2874: 2868: 2866:Access Denied 2860: 2852: 2846: 2841: 2835: 2834: 2832: 2824: 2823: 2822: 2817: 2811: 2810: 2808: 2800: 2796: 2790: 2786: 2780: 2777: 2776: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2762: 2761: 2755: 2753:Access Denied 2747: 2746: 2745: 2741: 2735: 2732: 2731: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2716: 2715: 2709: 2707:Access Denied 2698: 2691: 2683: 2679: 2674: 2668: 2667: 2665: 2657: 2653: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2643: 2638: 2633: 2627: 2623: 2615: 2605: 2602: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2591: 2585: 2584: 2582: 2574: 2569: 2560: 2559: 2556: 2553: 2548: 2546: 2543: 2536: 2535: 2532: 2529: 2527: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2511: 2508: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2496: 2490: 2489: 2487: 2476: 2469: 2465: 2451: 2446: 2444: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2431: 2429: 2423: 2418: 2415: 2412: 2411: 2410:So in short: 2409: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2398: 2392: 2391: 2389: 2381: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2371: 2367: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2356: 2350: 2349: 2347: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2334: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2322: 2316: 2315: 2313: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2299: 2287: 2282: 2276: 2275: 2273: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2258: 2256: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2240: 2234: 2233: 2231: 2216: 2206: 2199: 2191: 2186: 2180: 2179: 2177: 2162: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2149: 2147: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2131: 2125: 2124: 2122: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2107: 2101: 2100: 2098: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2082: 2080: 2071: 2070: 2065: 2063: 2051: 2046: 2040: 2039: 2037: 2029: 2028: 2017: 2014: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2003: 1997: 1996: 1994: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1980: 1979: 1974: 1969: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1953: 1947: 1946: 1944: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1930: 1929: 1924: 1919: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1901: 1895: 1894: 1892: 1884: 1877: 1867: 1857: 1847: 1831: 1826: 1820: 1819: 1817: 1809: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1801: 1797: 1792: 1788: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1776: 1770: 1769: 1767: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1754: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1741: 1735: 1734: 1732: 1724: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1694: 1685: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1661: 1659: 1657: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1601: 1596: 1591: 1585: 1579: 1578:editprotected 1570: 1568: 1567: 1564: 1562: 1555: 1547: 1543: 1538: 1534: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1522: 1517: 1512: 1504: 1503:editprotected 1495: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1478: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1463: 1459: 1452: 1447: 1441: 1439: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1423:the request ( 1422: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1371: 1365: 1361: 1356: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1346: 1343: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1326: 1321: 1314: 1311: 1306: 1304: 1301: 1294: 1289: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1250: 1248: 1247: 1243: 1238: 1234: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1212: 1207: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1192: 1185: 1184: 1171: 1167: 1162: 1160: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1144: 1142: 1132: 1130: 1124: 1122: 1118: 1111: 1108: 1106: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1085: 1081: 1075: 1073: 1072: 1067: 1062: 1061: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1034: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1019: 1018:editprotected 1011:Editprotected 1010: 1006: 1002: 997: 992: 983: 982: 981: 980: 976: 972: 964: 962: 961: 958: 953: 951: 947: 943: 939: 935: 930: 928: 921: 910: 904: 901: 900: 893: 890: 889: 887: 886: 885: 884: 880: 877: 876: 866: 864: 863: 860: 858: 847: 843: 839: 835: 831: 830: 829: 828: 825: 824: 813:User friendly 812: 810: 809: 802: 795: 790: 781: 779: 777: 774: 773: 771: 770: 760: 752: 750: 749: 746: 740: 736: 729: 721: 718: 716: 712: 711: 710: 707: 705: 700: 696: 695: 694: 691: 686: 677: 676: 675: 674: 671: 669: 664: 655: 644: 638: 635: 633: 628: 624: 620: 616: 611: 610: 609: 604: 600: 598: 591: 587: 583: 579: 578: 577: 574: 570: 566: 562: 552: 523: 520: 513: 506: 505: 504: 499: 495: 493: 486: 482: 478: 474: 469: 468: 466: 463: 456: 449: 448: 447: 442: 438: 436: 426: 419: 418: 416: 413: 405: 398: 394: 393: 392: 387: 383: 381: 374: 370: 365: 364: 362: 359: 354: 353: 352: 347: 343: 341: 334: 330: 325: 321: 320: 318: 315: 310: 307: 304: 299: 296: 295: 294: 289: 285: 283: 276: 272: 268: 264: 260: 259: 257: 254: 249: 248: 247: 242: 238: 236: 229: 224: 223: 221: 218: 211: 204: 200: 196: 195: 194: 192: 189: 181: 163: 162: 157: 156:February 2007 154: 153: 152: 151: 148: 147: 143: 138: 133: 132: 108: 106: 105: 100: 99: 92: 88: 87: 86:documentation 82: 78: 74: 70: 68: 62: 59: 52: 51: 43: 39: 38: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 4530: 4508: 4493: 4480: 4473:CHANGED_TEXT 4450: 4449: 4445: 4444: 4436: 4425:edit request 4386: 4348: 4325:edit request 4276: 4275: 4260: 4202: 4201: 4196: 4146: 4145: 4140: 4109: 4101: 4090:edit request 4059: 4007: 3980:Anomalocaris 3948: 3947: 3944: 3939: 3929:Anomalocaris 3910:Anomalocaris 3907: 3892: 3879: 3868: 3860: 3849:edit request 3773: 3730: 3726: 3590: 3583: 3576:The list at 3575: 3550: 3532:Anomalocaris 3517: 3509: 3498:edit request 3458: 3432: 3395: 3378:open channel 3377: 3368: 3361: 3332: 3324: 3313:edit request 3267: 3262: 3232: 3215: 3210: 3201: 3177: 3149: 3126: 3094: 3093: 3083:<pre: --> 3041: 3040: 3033: 3029: 3009: 3008: 2990: 2963:BASEPAGENAME 2955:BASEPAGENAME 2932: 2931: 2924: 2898: 2896: 2892:</tt: --> 2888: 2886: 2863: 2856: 2830: 2829: 2806: 2805: 2774: 2773: 2750: 2729: 2728: 2704: 2687: 2663: 2662: 2625: 2621: 2619: 2580: 2579: 2567: 2541: 2525: 2507: 2506: 2485: 2484: 2442: 2427: 2387: 2386: 2379: 2345: 2344: 2311: 2310: 2294: 2271: 2270: 2254: 2229: 2228: 2175: 2174: 2145: 2120: 2119: 2096: 2095: 2078: 2072: 2061: 2054: 2035: 2034: 1992: 1991: 1963: 1942: 1941: 1913: 1890: 1889: 1840: 1815: 1814: 1807: 1790: 1786: 1765: 1764: 1730: 1729: 1720: 1689: 1655: 1636: 1583: 1574: 1560: 1551: 1499: 1482:Plastikspork 1476: 1455: 1450: 1445: 1424: 1420: 1418: 1375: 1355:UltraExactZZ 1323: 1319: 1317: 1299: 1287: 1254: 1237:UltraExactZZ 1229: 1211:UltraExactZZ 1205: 1178: 1175: 1158: 1140: 1134: 1126: 1114: 1092: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1082: 1079: 1057: 1051: 1032: 1014: 996:UltraExactZZ 990: 968: 954: 949: 941: 933: 931: 914: 895: 874: 870: 851: 819: 816: 793: 788: 785: 762: 756: 753:Helpful link 741: 737: 733: 703: 667: 648: 631: 614: 596: 590:unblock-en-l 556: 512:unblockabuse 491: 455:unblockabuse 434: 425:unblockabuse 379: 339: 281: 274: 266: 234: 210:Unblockabuse 198: 185: 141: 102: 96: 94: 84: 69:from editing 65:permanently 64: 41: 35: 4264:. (Also at 4000:Ipberemoved 3882:<tt: --> 3520:<tt: --> 2899:<tt: --> 2889:<tt: --> 2628:templates? 2220:now has an 1382:a checkuser 950:Admins only 597:Luna Santin 492:Luna Santin 435:Luna Santin 380:Luna Santin 340:Luna Santin 282:Luna Santin 235:Luna Santin 203:User:RefBot 4482:87.1.48.40 4429:|answered= 4341:|answered= 4231:--jpgordon 4197:Link moved 4175:--jpgordon 4094:|answered= 4066:--jpgordon 4056:Formatting 3853:|answered= 3804:~ ToBeFree 3797:unblock-un 3753:~ ToBeFree 3739:~ ToBeFree 3647:~ ToBeFree 3629:~ ToBeFree 3611:~ ToBeFree 3502:|answered= 3369:FlightTime 3317:|answered= 3279:Jackmcbarn 3185:Olaf Davis 3133:Garygoh884 2872:talk to me 2759:talk to me 2713:talk to me 2443:Sandstein 2255:Sandstein 2146:Sandstein 2079:Sandstein 2062:Sandstein 1883:test cases 1584:<p: --> 1345:Od Mishehu 1159:Sandstein 1141:Sandstein 920:unblock-un 848:RDNS link. 104:test cases 91:categories 37:discussion 4390:— Martin 4261:Completed 4141:Completed 3978:markup! — 3802:as well. 3553:— Martin 3343:DannyS712 3207:User:DoRD 3063:mechamind 2971:mechamind 2905:mechamind 2799:testcases 2631:mechamind 2626:Autoblock 1589:mechamind 1386:Random832 1378:checkuser 1342:עוד מישהו 1320:talk page 1268:Srleffler 1059:Netsnipe 938:WP:APPEAL 745:Archtrain 565:RedsBot 2 77:consensus 67:protected 4509:Not done 4229:please? 3268:Lixxx235 3263:Thanks, 3216:Lixxx235 3211:Thanks, 3129:template 2894:" with 2883:A tweak. 2622:Username 2601:jpgordon 2526:Excirial 2428:Excirial 2370:jpgordon 2333:jpgordon 2298:jpgordon 2013:jpgordon 1800:jpgordon 1753:jpgordon 1693:jpgordon 1390:contribs 1360:Evidence 1242:Evidence 1216:Evidence 1189:Message 1039:CapitalR 1033:Not done 1001:Evidence 782:Updating 715:lucasbfr 615:decision 573:contribs 561:unsigned 263:WP:POINT 142:Archives 28:deletion 4024:history 3927:editor 3723:CAT:RFU 3706:unblock 3607:CAT:RFU 3586:CAT:RFU 3578:CAT:RFU 3335:current 3160:Unblock 3156:Example 2801:page). 2775:Goodvac 2730:Goodvac 2688:I have 2544:delanoy 2468:sandbox 2222:accept= 1846:unblock 1796:CAT:RFU 1723:sandbox 1670:Kaldari 1639:Kaldari 1554:on hold 1429:Nyttend 1401:PeaceNT 1302:delanoy 1181:Daniel 1117:CAT:RFU 942:editors 898:MBisanz 834:Rjd0060 822:MBisanz 801:ALLSTAR 519:SEWilco 462:SEWilco 412:SEWilco 404:unblock 373:WP:AN/I 358:SEWilco 333:WP:AN/I 314:SEWilco 303:SEWilco 253:SEWilco 217:SEWilco 188:SEWilco 98:sandbox 3819:331dot 3699:331dot 3685:331dot 3664:331dot 3464:Ahecht 3435:Ahecht 3097:dokter 3044:dokter 3012:dokter 2991:before 2935:dokter 2925:Oppose 2833:dokter 2809:dokter 2666:dokter 2583:dokter 2488:dokter 2390:dokter 2366:WP:RFU 2348:dokter 2314:dokter 2274:dokter 2232:dokter 2178:dokter 2123:dokter 2099:dokter 2038:dokter 1995:dokter 1945:dokter 1893:dokter 1885:page. 1818:dokter 1768:dokter 1733:dokter 1686:Hiding 1515:Impala 1458:C45207 1421:accept 1135:Best, 1110:WP:GAB 681:auburn 623:WP:ANI 228:WP:RFC 4552:Yamla 4518:Yamla 4451:Diff: 4433:|ans= 4423:This 4367:Aasim 4345:|ans= 4323:This 4098:|ans= 4088:This 4032:watch 4028:links 3857:|ans= 3847:This 3670:Yamla 3660:Ping 3643:Yamla 3506:|ans= 3496:This 3321:|ans= 3311:This 2210:, as 1972:COMMS 1967:ƒETCH 1922:COMMS 1917:ƒETCH 1510:Chevy 1496:Error 1172:Iwiki 971:Ulner 957:Doug. 768:demon 704:juice 699:Mango 684:pilot 668:juice 663:Mango 632:juice 627:Mango 619:WP:AN 485:WP:CN 481:WP:AN 477:WP:VP 473:WP:3O 369:WP:AN 329:WP:AN 199:Usage 40:was " 4556:talk 4537:talk 4522:talk 4516:. -- 4486:talk 4398:talk 4394:MSGJ 4387:Done 4335:and 4047:talk 4036:logs 4020:talk 4016:edit 3984:talk 3940:done 3914:talk 3823:talk 3808:talk 3792:and 3757:talk 3743:talk 3689:talk 3674:talk 3651:talk 3633:talk 3615:talk 3561:talk 3557:MSGJ 3551:Done 3536:talk 3530:. — 3471:PAGE 3469:TALK 3459:Done 3442:PAGE 3440:TALK 3362:Done 3347:talk 3339:diff 3283:talk 3256:DoRD 3245:talk 3241:DoRD 3189:talk 3137:talk 3103:Talk 3085:and 3050:Talk 3034:this 3018:Talk 2993:the 2941:Talk 2857:See 2839:Talk 2815:Talk 2784:talk 2739:talk 2684:Note 2672:Talk 2656:here 2654:and 2652:here 2624:and 2589:Talk 2568:Done 2551:adds 2512:fold 2509:Hers 2494:Talk 2396:Talk 2354:Talk 2320:Talk 2280:Talk 2238:Talk 2184:Talk 2129:Talk 2105:Talk 2044:Talk 2001:Talk 1951:Talk 1899:Talk 1871:and 1824:Talk 1774:Talk 1739:Talk 1707:talk 1703:DoRD 1674:talk 1656:xeno 1643:talk 1623:talk 1619:DoRD 1537:talk 1533:MSGJ 1520:2009 1486:talk 1477:Done 1462:Talk 1433:talk 1405:talk 1330:talk 1325:Cirt 1309:adds 1288:Done 1272:talk 1206:Done 1100:talk 1043:talk 991:Done 975:talk 838:talk 689:talk 603:talk 584:(or 569:talk 498:talk 441:talk 386:talk 346:talk 288:talk 273:. I 241:talk 230:. – 42:keep 4431:or 4373:❄️ 4343:or 4327:to 4287:ed. 4213:ed. 4157:ed. 4125:baz 4120:bar 4115:foo 4096:or 3958:ed. 3897:to 3874:to 3855:or 3711:by 3697:Hi 3626:SQL 3504:or 3319:or 3247:) 3162:'. 3030:may 1617:. — 1451:to 936:? 875:AGK 856:SQL 625:. 621:or 371:or 331:or 267:are 63:is 30:on 4558:) 4539:) 4524:) 4488:) 4437:no 4396:· 4369:- 4361:. 4349:no 4331:, 4284:, 4274:) 4272:}} 4266:{{ 4210:, 4154:, 4144:. 4102:no 4049:) 4034:| 4030:| 4026:| 4022:| 4018:| 4003:}} 3997:{{ 3986:) 3925:To 3916:) 3908:— 3861:no 3825:) 3810:) 3800:}} 3794:{{ 3790:}} 3784:{{ 3776:11 3759:) 3745:) 3719:}} 3713:{{ 3709:}} 3703:{{ 3691:) 3676:) 3653:) 3635:) 3617:) 3609:. 3603:}} 3597:{{ 3559:· 3538:) 3510:no 3474:) 3445:) 3433:-- 3364:- 3349:) 3325:no 3285:) 3239:— 3233:re 3191:) 3139:) 3106:— 3100:• 3091:— 3053:— 3047:• 3038:— 3021:— 3015:• 3006:— 3001:}} 2995:{{ 2965:}} 2961:{{ 2957:}} 2953:{{ 2944:— 2938:• 2929:— 2869:– 2861:. 2842:• 2836:• 2827:— 2818:• 2812:• 2803:— 2787:) 2756:– 2742:) 2710:– 2700:}} 2694:{{ 2675:• 2669:• 2660:— 2592:• 2586:• 2577:— 2497:• 2491:• 2482:— 2478:}} 2472:{{ 2399:• 2393:• 2384:— 2357:• 2351:• 2342:— 2331:-- 2323:• 2317:• 2308:— 2296:-- 2283:• 2277:• 2268:— 2241:• 2235:• 2226:— 2218:}} 2212:{{ 2208:}} 2202:{{ 2187:• 2181:• 2172:— 2164:}} 2158:{{ 2132:• 2126:• 2117:— 2108:• 2102:• 2093:— 2047:• 2041:• 2032:— 2004:• 1998:• 1989:— 1954:• 1948:• 1939:— 1902:• 1896:• 1887:— 1879:}} 1873:{{ 1869:}} 1863:{{ 1861:, 1859:}} 1853:{{ 1851:, 1849:}} 1843:{{ 1827:• 1821:• 1812:— 1777:• 1771:• 1762:— 1742:• 1736:• 1727:— 1709:) 1676:) 1645:) 1625:) 1611:1= 1580:}} 1576:{{ 1535:· 1505:}} 1501:{{ 1488:) 1460:| 1435:) 1407:) 1392:) 1332:) 1274:) 1209:. 1102:) 1065:► 1045:) 1020:}} 1016:{{ 994:. 977:) 923:}} 917:{{ 840:) 657:}} 651:{{ 575:). 571:• 515:}} 509:{{ 483:, 479:, 475:, 467:) 458:}} 452:{{ 428:}} 422:{{ 417:) 407:}} 401:{{ 363:) 319:) 275:do 258:) 222:) 213:}} 207:{{ 193:) 107:. 93:. 44:". 4554:( 4535:( 4520:( 4484:( 4468:+ 4458:− 4400:) 4392:( 4045:( 4038:) 4014:( 3982:( 3945:! 3931:: 3912:( 3821:( 3806:( 3755:( 3741:( 3733:. 3687:( 3672:( 3666:: 3662:@ 3649:( 3631:( 3613:( 3563:) 3555:( 3534:( 3466:( 3437:( 3382:) 3374:( 3345:( 3281:( 3258:: 3254:@ 3243:( 3187:( 3135:( 3095:E 3073:0 3068:9 3042:E 3010:E 2981:0 2976:9 2933:E 2915:0 2910:9 2897:" 2831:E 2807:E 2781:( 2736:( 2664:E 2641:0 2636:9 2581:E 2542:. 2540:J 2486:E 2388:E 2346:E 2312:E 2272:E 2230:E 2176:E 2121:E 2097:E 2036:E 1993:E 1977:/ 1964:/ 1943:E 1927:/ 1914:/ 1891:E 1816:E 1766:E 1731:E 1705:( 1672:( 1641:( 1621:( 1599:0 1594:9 1557:— 1539:) 1531:( 1484:( 1431:( 1403:( 1388:( 1357:~ 1328:( 1300:. 1298:J 1270:( 1239:~ 1213:~ 1098:( 1041:( 998:~ 973:( 879:§ 836:( 805:✰ 797:✰ 794:- 764:^ 605:) 601:( 567:( 524:) 500:) 496:( 443:) 439:( 410:( 388:) 384:( 356:( 348:) 344:( 312:( 308:) 301:( 290:) 286:( 243:) 239:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index