1247:, if, for example, like myself, they have no knowledge of the subject. Frankly, I think the problem boils down to the wrong reading audience being considered here. Those of us who are knowledgeable in an area are (unlike academia, or so it seems) not writing for others who are knowledgeable in the same area, but for those who wish to learn about what we are writing about and don't necessarily know anything about it. I don't see anything wrong with having one template, but the names should be changed to reflect the name of the country at the time. Size is not an issue as it can be collapsed and expanded in stages with a little bit of template coding.
165:
707:
grand scheme of things, they are minute details. You probably know only because you have access to a text with the answers. Just because my knowledge is not that in depth does not mean that I am not able to contribute. Indeed, if only a person with perfect knowledge of a subject was allowed to be involved in it, we wouldn't have got much further than throwing spears and grunting. The
Zimbabwean elections articles are not yours alone, and if you insist on believing so, then it will not end in your favour.
155:
131:
22:
71:
53:
276:
Southern
Rhodesia/Rhodesia/Zimbabwe Rhodesia are all consecutively numbered up from 1 to vol. 101 in 1979, while those of the Parliament of Zimbabwe start again at volume 1, showing a clear discontinuity: in other words, Southern Rhodesia/Rhodesia/Zimbabwe Rhodesia is one continuous run, but Zimbabwe is not. Finally, when I created the template I included flags, so it's for me to say what the reason for them was.
213:
822:
Well I could argue that your version was lying to readers as there was no
Rhodesian election in 1899 as the state was called Southern Rhodesia, not just Rhodesia, as well as pointing out that the black population was referring to the country as Zimbabwe by 1970. If we split the template up to include
1126:
And actually, there was no change in the system of government until 1987; the country remained under the parliamentary system until then despite the changes in the voting system and name. Making a mistake like that makes me think that we may indeed "have people here who know absolutely nothing about
778:
I think some people have quite simply missed the point. There was no
Zimbabwean election in 1970. It's that simple. This "new" template simply deceives readers; think about the surprise on their face when suddenly they're looking at the "Rhodesian" election of 1970. Perhaps you intend to change that
641:
Are you suggesting I know nothing about the politics and history of
Zimbabwe or Rhodesia? I am not the ignoramus you seem to think I am. I don't understand what your problem associating Rhodesia and Zimbabwe is. They are patently the same entity, albeit under a different name and political system. I
1018:
If you are on the page, reading about those elections, you will see that the title says "Rhodesian" or "Southern
Rhodesian" or whatever the country was called then. The template is not the place for pointing that out. If I were you I would refrain from accusing people of not knowing anything about
1242:
I got to the article on the 2008 election through
Wikinews, and when I saw this template at the bottom, I thought "I didn't know Zimbabwe was around in 1899, let's see what this says", whereupon I was brought to a page on an election in Rhodesia. Clearly, the country did not exist as such at the
706:
So the
Republic of South Africa did not exist before 1994? No Poland before 1990? The argument of a country's existence being based on its political system is very poor. How many Nigerias have there been if this is the rationale? As for not answering your questions above, no I couldn't but in the
297:
I included all the elections under the name
Zimbabwe, as although the name has changed, the country is the same territorial terms. I don't think it would be appropriate to split templates based on name changes (would Sri Lankan/Ceylon elections have to be separated?) or colonial status. Perhaps a
275:
That's bollocks on so many levels. Firstly, Southern
Rhodesia retained responsibility for elections throughout Federation and its dominion government remained exactly as before (only with a few less responsibilities). So there's a clear continuity there. The Debates of the Legislative Assembly of
1150:
Congratulations on discovering that Bob got rid of the white seats and created an executive presidency in '87. Rhodesia and Zimbabwe were different entities. There was no Zimbabwean election in 1970. The election processes in Rhodesia and Zimbabwe were radically different. Why can you not fathom
1094:
If the name refers to a separate state contingent with the same land area, then it deserves a different article. If it is just a cosmetic name change (Burma / Myanmar) then I'd leave it alone. Rhodesia was not just a cosmetic name change; it was a different state, different system of government,
1008:
No, the current version is a lie. There was not a Zimbabwean referendum in 1964 about independence under the then-current constitution. Garfield Todd did not win the Zimbabwean election of 1953. I think we have people here who know absolutely nothing about this country dictating to those who do.
750:
is still valid in this context. We have the elections for the different German states in a single template. We have the elections for Myanmar in the same template, which fundamentally changed its political system and its name. I do not claim that your way of seeing it is wrong, but I'd prefer to
725:
Your 'standardization' of templates has not the blessing of any degree of consensus. It's simply your preference which you're trying to claim as policy. I said absolutely nothing about South Africa (which merely changed the franchise in 1994) nor Poland (which ceased to be Communist in 1989, not
667:
You couldn't answer my questions above. Rhodesia and Zimbabwe are patently not the same entity. They may have the same boundaries, but that is not the same thing – you even acknowledge "different political system". Different political systems shouldn't be equated, should they? And if your entire
270:
Plus I would argue that the logic is not consistent. If you want to separate Rhodesian and Zimbabwean elections based on the fact there "was no such country as Zimbabwe before 1980", then surely you would also have to create seperate boxes for Southern Rhodesia, Southern Rhodesia as part of the
413:
The flags are those of Rhodesia and not Zimbabwe. Getting the two confused is plainly stupid. Ian Smith was not Prime Minister of Zimbabwe and Robert Mugabe is not President of Rhodesia. You try telling either of them that and you'd get a pretty curt response, I can tell you.
668:
argument is summed up by "Yah boo sucks you've been banned" then perhaps you should reflect on how weak it is. You haven't presented a single good reason, nor made a single positive contribution in this area. Go away and leave the work of productive contributors alone.
1040:
You are perpetuating a lie rather than a simple generalisation (Sth Rho/Rho)through this. Again, you are misleading readers into thinking that there were Zimbawean elections in 1970 or 1962. I don't know how much simpler I can make it. Surely there is a WP:LIES?
1182:
But it is not "elections which have taken place in the country we know now as Zimbabwe" in the template. It is (to give one example) "Zimbabwean parliamentary elections" even though there was no such thing as a Zimbabwean parliamentary election prior to 1980.
271:
Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland, Rhodesia, Zimbabwe Rhodesia and Zimbabwe. This would end up ridiculously large, and was the reason the flags were included in the template as a shorter way of showing the country's status at the time of the elections.
1050:
You seem a bit obessed with the lies thing. Click on the link and you go to an article entitled Rhodesia/Southern Rhodesian/Zimbabwe Rhodesian elections. We don't have to put all the former names in the template; it's just unnecessary. Would you rename
343:
PS. Although referendums has somehow found its way into common usage as the plural of referendum, the correct term is indeed referenda (as it is a latin word, it has a latin plural as is the situation with words like cactus (cacti) and datum (data)).
1160:
I know they were radically different, and the articles note that. The template, however, is not the place; it's purpose is merely to link any elections which have taken place in the country we know now as Zimbabwe. Why can you not fathom that?
438:
PS - you obviously couldn't answer the questions. The reason why Rhodesia/Zimbabwe has the best coverage on Knowledge (XXG) about its electoral history is that I have written it, not you. So go away until you contribute constructively.
1009:
Unless some distinction is made between Rhodesia and Zimbabwe, you are deceiving your readers and they are in for quite a shock when they look at these pre-1980 'Zimbabwean' elections and wonder why everything is radically different.
1104:
Would you separate templates in cases where there was no name change, but a change in the government system? The answer should be no, and the fact that there just happened to be (several) name changes here makes it no different.
533:
Certainly bragging about how many articles you have written on politics in Zimbabwe does not. If you have descended to this level, I can point out that I have created around 120 election templates and standardised several
844:
It wouldn't be unwieldy, it would be factually correct. The old template was easy to read, and correct. The new template is not any easier to read, and is incorrect. So if we want to score both points, revert back.
1243:
time, and while I would consider it lying, it is misinformative - no real sources are going to say that Zimbabwe existed in 1899, and flags alone are not helpful for people unaware of what those flags
1192:
I think you underestimate the intelligence of the reader; the second statement can be read as a contraction of the first in the context which it is placed. As noted before, we don't entitle articles
923:
I'd be happy with that if the flags in the titles were removed and the redundant "Zimbabwean" removed from each of the titles. Replace with a simple "Zimbabwean and Rhodesian elections" at the top.
614:
If it takes a mediator to tell you you're in the wrong, then take it there, I don't see why I should participate. Rhodesia is still not the same as Zimbabwe and nothing you can do will make it so.
1226:
Again, to clarify my argument: We're doing it with all other countries which changed names and systems multiple times, and it does not at all confuse people, so why should Zimbabwe be different? —
970:
Your claim is that merely putting Zimbabwean elections is "lying"; surely this must apply to just using Zimbabwean and Rhodesian elections, as it ignores Southern Rhodesia and Zimbabwe Rhodesia.
1270:
932:
I disagree; I don't see the need for the country's former names to be used in the template; according to your demands of including previous names to avoid "lying" to readers, it should read
1275:
788:
I don't think that the country changed its name and/or electoral system means that the template has to be split. It certainly isn't the case for any other country which has done so.
726:
1990). Would you put the Palestinian Legislative Council in the same template as the Israeli Knesset, pray tell? I will listen to people like Bob Scarlett on this but not to you.
961:
Main heading: "Zimbabwean and Rhodesian elections". Sub headings: Presidential elections, general elections, etc... Flags to show state in place at time of elections. That's it.
884:
No, because that would make it far too large; there was only one election in Zimbabwe Rhodesia and there is no need for a separate section for it. A previous solution was to do
302:
I don't give a toss about Sri Lanka. It's Rhodesia and Zimbabwe under discussion. Frankly I'd take you more seriously if you could answer these three questions correctly:
96:
78:
58:
854:
As I've just noted, the previous version would not be factually correct because it didn't have separate sections for Southern Rhodesia, Rhodesia and Zimbabwe Rhodesia.
542:
OK, I write about elections, you write templates. Well done. Next you'll be arguing that you ought to be PM because you've washed the windows at 10 Downing Street.
403:
This template already has a compromise to show former incarnations of the country (the flags), which is not needed on any other. Why can't you accept this?
378:
I will revert anyone who suggests that there was a Zimbabwean election in 1899. Ridiculous, absolutely stupid. Anyone who says it is manifestly bonkers.
307:
1) In the provisional determination of boundaries by the Delimitation Commission of 1969, how many Coloured voters were there in Willowvale constituency?
245:
Although I understand why the box was enlarged to separate colonial- and independence-era elections, it does make the box overly large and complicated.
1290:
1295:
1280:
1300:
1285:
823:
all the former names, then it would be unwieldy. The fact is that there was an election in the country which is now called Zimbabwe in 1899.
1305:
187:
751:
arrive at some common point which we then could employ in all templates of countries with similarily complicated historical issues. —
222:
141:
313:
3) What was the date of birth of James Done, Independent candidate for Salisbury Central in 1954, and how many votes did he get?
940:
as they have only taken place since 1990). Templates are for linking articles, not for writing a history of the country's name.
1207:
1172:
1138:
1116:
1078:
1030:
981:
951:
899:
865:
834:
799:
178:
136:
33:
508:
It does show your destructive tendencies and ignorance about the subject in sharp relief though, which is why I mention it.
500:
Just because you have written or created an article does not give you the right to prevent anyone changing the format of it.
757:
1056:
467:
Going by your history on Knowledge (XXG), you obviously have a problem interacting with other people constructively.
1193:
1064:
734:
676:
622:
583:
550:
516:
483:
447:
422:
386:
360:
321:
284:
257:
1184:
1152:
1096:
1042:
1010:
962:
924:
876:
846:
814:
780:
39:
767:
186:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1052:
747:
1202:
1167:
1133:
1111:
1073:
1060:
1025:
976:
946:
894:
860:
829:
794:
875:
Well, if that is your qualm, then we shall correct it, dividing it into the appropriate sections.
1227:
997:
762:
752:
154:
130:
82:, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to
1252:
334:
Anyway, please respond before reverting and perhaps another compromise solution can be found.
90:
1256:
1232:
1212:
1187:
1177:
1155:
1143:
1121:
1099:
1083:
1045:
1035:
1013:
1002:
986:
965:
956:
927:
904:
879:
870:
849:
839:
817:
804:
783:
772:
741:
711:
683:
646:
629:
604:
590:
557:
523:
490:
454:
429:
407:
393:
367:
338:
328:
291:
264:
934:
Southern Rhodesian, Rhodesian, Zimbabwe Rhodesian and Zimbabwean parliamentary elections
1238:
I have to agree with those who say the template should reflect the names at the time...
1197:
1162:
1128:
1106:
1068:
1020:
971:
941:
889:
855:
824:
789:
708:
643:
601:
404:
335:
70:
52:
1264:
737:
679:
625:
586:
553:
519:
486:
450:
425:
389:
363:
324:
287:
260:
170:
1248:
1196:
even when they include history of the country when it was under a different name.
212:
349:
160:
94:
and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit
1095:
different system of elections -- there was not just a cosmetic name change.
936:, which is ridiculous (the presidential elections section would remain as
731:
727:
673:
669:
619:
615:
580:
576:
547:
543:
513:
509:
480:
476:
444:
440:
419:
415:
383:
379:
357:
353:
318:
314:
281:
277:
254:
250:
84:
642:
also suggest you stop the abusive language before you are banned again.
813:. Pretending otherwise is essentially lying. You are lying to readers.
183:
310:
2) Who was Registrar-General of Elections at the 1985 election?
888:, but I'd imagine the WP:FLAG people would not be very happy.
475:
As if that makes your case. Pathetic. I'm completely unmoved.
15:
1019:
the subject. You have no idea who I am or what I know about.
211:
885:
298:
more subtle marker (asterixes or the flags) is better.
996:
I agree with Number57, the current version is fine. —
106:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Elections and Referendums
182:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1271:Template-Class Elections and Referendums articles
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1276:WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles
600:Perhaps a mediator can help solve this issue.
109:Template:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
746:I think the argument of legal continuity and
8:
567:Anyway, the new edit is not an improvement.
125:
47:
811:There was no Zimbabwean election in 1970
127:
49:
176:This template is within the scope of
79:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
76:This template is within the scope of
21:
19:
7:
38:It is of interest to the following
809:But that's nothing to do with it.
196:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Africa
112:Elections and Referendums articles
14:
938:Zimbabwean presidential elections
1291:Template-Class Zimbabwe articles
163:
153:
129:
69:
51:
20:
1296:NA-importance Zimbabwe articles
1057:History of Ceylon and Sri Lanka
1281:Template-Class Africa articles
220:This template is supported by
1:
1301:WikiProject Zimbabwe articles
1286:NA-importance Africa articles
348:That's bollocks as well. See
190:and see a list of open tasks.
1194:History of Siam and Thailand
1065:History of Siam and Thailand
773:10:33, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
742:20:25, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
712:20:00, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
684:19:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
647:19:41, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
630:19:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
605:19:24, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
591:19:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
558:19:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
524:19:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
491:19:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
455:19:20, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
430:19:18, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
408:19:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
394:19:03, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
1306:WikiProject Africa articles
575:Well bollocks to you then.
368:19:10, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
339:10:57, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
329:19:10, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
292:19:10, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
265:19:10, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
199:Template:WikiProject Africa
1322:
1257:14:43, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
1233:02:40, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
1213:21:20, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
1188:21:14, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
1178:21:12, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
1156:21:09, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
1144:21:00, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
1122:20:57, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
1100:20:52, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
1084:20:40, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
1046:19:54, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
1036:20:04, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
1014:19:51, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
1003:12:50, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
987:10:47, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
966:10:33, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
957:09:55, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
928:09:51, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
905:09:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
880:09:31, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
871:09:25, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
850:09:21, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
840:09:15, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
818:07:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
805:21:58, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
784:19:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
219:
148:
103:Elections and Referendums
64:
59:Elections and Referendums
46:
216:
779:article's name, too?
215:
1053:History of Sri Lanka
748:succession of states
223:WikiProject Zimbabwe
1061:History of Thailand
374:Ridiculous changes
217:
179:WikiProject Africa
34:content assessment
238:
237:
234:
233:
230:
229:
124:
123:
120:
119:
1313:
1230:
1210:
1205:
1200:
1175:
1170:
1165:
1141:
1136:
1131:
1119:
1114:
1109:
1081:
1076:
1071:
1033:
1028:
1023:
1000:
984:
979:
974:
954:
949:
944:
902:
897:
892:
868:
863:
858:
837:
832:
827:
802:
797:
792:
765:
760:
755:
204:
203:
200:
197:
194:
173:
168:
167:
166:
157:
150:
149:
144:
133:
126:
114:
113:
110:
107:
104:
97:our project page
91:electoral reform
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
25:
24:
23:
16:
1321:
1320:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1261:
1260:
1240:
1228:
1208:
1203:
1198:
1173:
1168:
1163:
1139:
1134:
1129:
1127:this country".
1117:
1112:
1107:
1079:
1074:
1069:
1031:
1026:
1021:
998:
982:
977:
972:
952:
947:
942:
900:
895:
890:
866:
861:
856:
835:
830:
825:
800:
795:
790:
763:
758:
753:
401:
376:
249:No it doesn't.
243:
202:Africa articles
201:
198:
195:
192:
191:
169:
164:
162:
139:
111:
108:
105:
102:
101:
12:
11:
5:
1319:
1317:
1309:
1308:
1303:
1298:
1293:
1288:
1283:
1278:
1273:
1263:
1262:
1239:
1236:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
994:
993:
992:
991:
990:
989:
959:
921:
920:
919:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
723:
722:
721:
720:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
714:
695:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
689:
688:
687:
686:
656:
655:
654:
653:
652:
651:
650:
649:
612:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
460:
459:
458:
457:
433:
432:
400:
397:
375:
372:
371:
370:
332:
331:
311:
308:
304:
303:
295:
294:
268:
267:
242:
239:
236:
235:
232:
231:
228:
227:
218:
208:
207:
205:
188:the discussion
175:
174:
158:
146:
145:
134:
122:
121:
118:
117:
115:
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1318:
1307:
1304:
1302:
1299:
1297:
1294:
1292:
1289:
1287:
1284:
1282:
1279:
1277:
1274:
1272:
1269:
1268:
1266:
1259:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1237:
1235:
1234:
1231:
1229:Nightstallion
1214:
1211:
1206:
1201:
1195:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1186:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1176:
1171:
1166:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1154:
1149:
1145:
1142:
1137:
1132:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1120:
1115:
1110:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1098:
1093:
1085:
1082:
1077:
1072:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1044:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1034:
1029:
1024:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1012:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1001:
999:Nightstallion
988:
985:
980:
975:
969:
968:
967:
964:
960:
958:
955:
950:
945:
939:
935:
931:
930:
929:
926:
922:
906:
903:
898:
893:
887:
883:
882:
881:
878:
874:
873:
872:
869:
864:
859:
853:
852:
851:
848:
843:
842:
841:
838:
833:
828:
821:
820:
819:
816:
812:
808:
807:
806:
803:
798:
793:
787:
786:
785:
782:
777:
776:
775:
774:
771:
770:
766:
761:
756:
749:
744:
743:
739:
736:
733:
729:
713:
710:
705:
704:
703:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
697:
696:
685:
681:
678:
675:
671:
666:
665:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
658:
657:
648:
645:
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
633:
632:
631:
627:
624:
621:
617:
606:
603:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
588:
585:
582:
578:
566:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
555:
552:
549:
545:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
521:
518:
515:
511:
499:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
492:
488:
485:
482:
478:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
456:
452:
449:
446:
442:
437:
436:
435:
434:
431:
427:
424:
421:
417:
412:
411:
410:
409:
406:
398:
396:
395:
391:
388:
385:
381:
373:
369:
365:
362:
359:
355:
351:
347:
346:
345:
341:
340:
337:
330:
326:
323:
320:
316:
312:
309:
306:
305:
301:
300:
299:
293:
289:
286:
283:
279:
274:
273:
272:
266:
262:
259:
256:
252:
248:
247:
246:
240:
225:
224:
214:
210:
209:
206:
189:
185:
181:
180:
172:
171:Africa portal
161:
159:
156:
152:
151:
147:
143:
138:
135:
132:
128:
116:
99:
98:
93:
92:
87:
86:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
1244:
1241:
1225:
995:
937:
933:
810:
768:
745:
724:
682:”.
672:. “
613:
574:
541:
507:
474:
453:”.
443:. “
428:”.
418:. “
402:
377:
366:”.
356:. “
342:
333:
327:”.
317:. “
296:
290:”.
280:. “
269:
263:”.
253:. “
244:
221:
177:
95:
89:
83:
77:
40:WikiProjects
29:
1265:Categories
399:Compromise
350:Referendum
709:Number 57
644:Number 57
602:Number 57
405:Number 57
336:Number 57
85:elections
142:Zimbabwe
30:template
1249:MSJapan
1185:Michael
1153:Michael
1097:Michael
1043:Michael
1011:Michael
963:Michael
925:Michael
877:Michael
847:Michael
815:Michael
781:Michael
754:Nightst
1199:пﮟოьεԻ
1164:пﮟოьεԻ
1151:that?
1130:пﮟოьεԻ
1108:пﮟოьεԻ
1070:пﮟოьεԻ
1022:пﮟოьεԻ
973:пﮟოьεԻ
943:пﮟოьεԻ
891:пﮟოьεԻ
857:пﮟოьεԻ
826:пﮟოьεԻ
791:пﮟოьεԻ
241:Layout
193:Africa
184:Africa
137:Africa
36:scale.
764:llion
534:more.
28:This
1253:talk
886:this
1245:are
1063:to
1059:or
1055:to
769:(?)
740:.
738:aym
735:fys
730:.
728:Fys
680:aym
677:fys
670:Fys
628:.
626:aym
623:fys
618:.
616:Fys
589:.
587:aym
584:fys
579:.
577:Fys
556:.
554:aym
551:fys
546:.
544:Fys
522:.
520:aym
517:fys
512:.
510:Fys
489:.
487:aym
484:fys
479:.
477:Fys
451:aym
448:fys
441:Fys
426:aym
423:fys
416:Fys
392:.
390:aym
387:fys
382:.
380:Fys
364:aym
361:fys
354:Fys
325:aym
322:fys
315:Fys
288:aym
285:fys
278:Fys
261:aym
258:fys
251:Fys
1267::
1255:)
1067:?
732:Ta
674:Ta
620:Ta
581:Ta
548:Ta
514:Ta
481:Ta
445:Ta
420:Ta
384:Ta
358:Ta
352:.
319:Ta
282:Ta
255:Ta
140::
88:,
1251:(
1209:7
1204:5
1174:7
1169:5
1140:7
1135:5
1118:7
1113:5
1080:7
1075:5
1032:7
1027:5
983:7
978:5
953:7
948:5
901:7
896:5
867:7
862:5
836:7
831:5
801:7
796:5
759:a
226:.
100:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
