102:, hypothetical stories are used to help the tester think through a complex problem or system. These scenarios are usually not written down in any detail. They can be as simple as a diagram for a testing environment or they could be a description written in prose. The ideal scenario test is a story that is motivating, credible, complex, and easy to evaluate. They are usually different from test cases in that test cases are single steps while scenarios cover a number of steps of the key.
1142:
1132:
211:
Under special circumstances, there could be a need to run the test, produce results, and then a team of experts would evaluate if the results can be considered as a pass. This happens often on new products' performance number determination. The first test is taken as the base line for subsequent test
70:
In order to fully test that all the requirements of an application are met, there must be at least two test cases for each requirement: one positive test and one negative test. If a requirement has sub-requirements, each sub-requirement must have at least two test cases. Keeping track of the link
94:
For applications or systems without formal requirements, test cases can be written based on the accepted normal operation of programs of a similar class. In some schools of testing, test cases are not written at all but the activities and results are reported after the tests have been run.
207:
Besides a description of the functionality to be tested, and the preparation required to ensure that the test can be conducted, the most time-consuming part in the test case is creating the tests and modifying them when the system changes.
57:
can be built to produce the desired coverage of the software being tested. Formally defined test cases allow the same tests to be run repeatedly against successive versions of the software, allowing for effective and consistent
189:
In a database system, you may also be able to see past test results and who generated the results and the system configuration used to generate those results. These past results would usually be stored in a separate table.
110:
A test case usually contains a single step or a sequence of steps to test the correct behaviour/functionality and features of an application. An expected result or expected outcome is usually given.
53:
objective, such as to exercise a particular program path or to verify compliance with a specific requirement. Test cases underlie testing that is methodical rather than haphazard. A
222:
or clients of the system to ensure the developed system meets the requirements specified or the contract. User acceptance tests are differentiated by the inclusion of
78:
A formal written test case is characterized by a known input and by an expected output, which is worked out before the test is executed. The known input should test a
618:
49:
is a specification of the inputs, execution conditions, testing procedure, and expected results that define a single test to be executed to achieve a particular
75:. Written test cases should include a description of the functionality to be tested, and the preparation required to ensure that the test can be conducted.
1001:
930:
546:
405:
271:
824:
727:
611:
804:
671:
656:
571:
517:
492:
445:
344:
1135:
960:
887:
877:
722:
651:
1011:
1145:
940:
882:
604:
309:
950:
809:
676:
872:
867:
681:
1067:
915:
910:
862:
839:
819:
235:
35:
1166:
1072:
1062:
975:
774:
757:
666:
925:
769:
980:
737:
732:
186:
These steps can be stored in a word processor document, spreadsheet, database or other common repository.
799:
752:
537:
Managing the
Testing Process: Practical Tools and Techniques for Managing Hardware and Software Testing
1097:
935:
794:
784:
696:
641:
627:
42:
1117:
1102:
970:
834:
742:
686:
72:
484:
1107:
747:
451:
59:
397:
1021:
779:
567:
542:
513:
488:
441:
425:
401:
340:
336:
267:
1092:
1036:
814:
706:
701:
433:
385:
259:
99:
50:
1112:
965:
945:
829:
691:
215:
31:
477:
1016:
920:
661:
393:
329:
1160:
996:
764:
535:
430:
2014 International
Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence
386:
218:, which use a variation of a written test case, are commonly performed by a group of
83:
455:
1031:
1026:
955:
180:
Larger test cases may also contain prerequisite states or steps, and descriptions.
79:
590:
360:
263:
226:
or positive test cases to the almost complete exclusion of negative test cases.
30:
This article is about the term in software engineering. For the legal term, see
1041:
1006:
223:
193:
54:
149:- Conditions that must exist or preparation required before test execution.
437:
789:
288:
219:
138:- The expected outcome and how to determine whether it has been realized.
17:
596:
183:
A written test case should also contain a place for the actual result.
646:
846:
27:
Specification of a software test, its objective and its procedure
1057:
71:
between the requirement and the test is frequently done using a
600:
166:- whether this test case is automated or not and, if so, how.
426:"Equilibrium of Decision-Making Process in Financial Market"
388:
Agile
Testing: A Practical Guide for Testers and Agile Teams
258:. Iso/Iec/IEEE 24765:2010(E). 2010-12-01. pp. 1–418.
564:
UAT Defined: A Guide to
Practical User Acceptance Testing
483:(2nd ed.). Boston: Thomson Computer Press. p.
310:"Writing Test Rules to Verify Stakeholder Requirements"
1085:
1050:
989:
903:
896:
855:
715:
634:
534:
476:
328:
475:Kaner, Cem; Falk, Jack; Nguyen, Hung Q. (1993).
508:Hambling, Brian; van Goethem, Pauline (2013).
256:Systems and software engineering -- Vocabulary
612:
510:User Acceptance Testing: A Step-by-step Guide
113:Additional information that may be included:
8:
900:
619:
605:
597:
512:. BCS Learning & Development Limited.
566:. Pearson Education. pp. Chapter 2.
810:Software development process/methodology
120:- A unique identifier for the test case.
247:
384:Crispin, Lisa; Gregory, Janet (2009).
82:and the expected output should test a
419:
417:
361:"An Introduction to Scenario Testing"
7:
1131:
825:Software verification and validation
728:Component-based software engineering
25:
805:Software configuration management
672:Search-based software engineering
657:Experimental software engineering
1141:
1140:
1130:
106:Typical written test case format
652:Empirical software engineering
591:Software Test Case Engineering
327:Beizer, Boris (May 22, 1995).
1:
132:- The exact steps to perform.
677:Site reliability engineering
264:10.1109/IEEESTD.2010.5733835
212:and product release cycles.
682:Social software engineering
335:. New York: Wiley. p.
289:"What Is a Good Test Case?"
1183:
820:Software quality assurance
533:Black, Rex (August 2009).
236:Classification Tree Method
126:- The test case objective.
36:Test case (disambiguation)
29:
1126:
479:Testing Computer Software
976:Model-driven engineering
775:Functional specification
758:Software incompatibility
667:Requirements engineering
770:Enterprise architecture
562:Cimperman, Rob (2006).
287:Kaner, Cem (May 2003).
981:Round-trip engineering
738:Backward compatibility
733:Software compatibility
541:. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
34:. For other uses, see
800:Software architecture
753:Forward compatibility
438:10.1109/CSCI.2014.104
160:- name of the tester.
55:battery of test cases
1098:Computer engineering
795:Software archaeology
785:Programming paradigm
697:Software maintenance
642:Computer programming
628:Software engineering
432:. pp. 113–121.
43:software engineering
1118:Systems engineering
1103:Information science
883:Service orientation
835:Structured analysis
743:Compatibility layer
687:Software deployment
196:often also contain
124:Description/summary
90:Informal test cases
73:traceability matrix
1108:Project management
873:Object orientation
840:Essential analysis
748:Compatibility mode
424:Liu, Juan (2014).
60:regression testing
1154:
1153:
1081:
1080:
1022:Information model
926:Incremental model
780:Modeling language
548:978-0-470-40415-7
407:978-81-317-3068-3
331:Black Box Testing
273:978-0-7381-6205-8
66:Formal test cases
16:(Redirected from
1174:
1167:Software testing
1144:
1143:
1134:
1133:
1093:Computer science
901:
815:Software quality
707:Systems analysis
702:Software testing
621:
614:
607:
598:
578:
577:
559:
553:
552:
540:
530:
524:
523:
505:
499:
498:
482:
472:
466:
465:
463:
462:
421:
412:
411:
391:
381:
375:
374:
372:
371:
365:
357:
351:
350:
334:
324:
318:
317:
306:
300:
299:
293:
284:
278:
277:
252:
216:Acceptance tests
100:scenario testing
51:software testing
21:
1182:
1181:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1150:
1122:
1113:Risk management
1077:
1046:
985:
966:Waterfall model
936:Prototype model
931:Iterative model
892:
868:Aspect-oriented
851:
830:Software system
711:
692:Software design
630:
625:
593:By Ajay Bhagwat
587:
582:
581:
574:
561:
560:
556:
549:
532:
531:
527:
520:
507:
506:
502:
495:
474:
473:
469:
460:
458:
448:
423:
422:
415:
408:
383:
382:
378:
369:
367:
363:
359:
358:
354:
347:
326:
325:
321:
308:
307:
303:
291:
286:
285:
281:
274:
254:
253:
249:
244:
232:
136:Expected result
108:
92:
68:
39:
32:Test case (law)
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1180:
1178:
1170:
1169:
1159:
1158:
1152:
1151:
1149:
1148:
1138:
1127:
1124:
1123:
1121:
1120:
1115:
1110:
1105:
1100:
1095:
1089:
1087:
1086:Related fields
1083:
1082:
1079:
1078:
1076:
1075:
1070:
1065:
1060:
1054:
1052:
1048:
1047:
1045:
1044:
1039:
1034:
1029:
1024:
1019:
1017:Function model
1014:
1009:
1004:
999:
993:
991:
987:
986:
984:
983:
978:
973:
968:
963:
958:
953:
948:
943:
938:
933:
928:
923:
921:Executable UML
918:
913:
907:
905:
898:
894:
893:
891:
890:
885:
880:
875:
870:
865:
859:
857:
853:
852:
850:
849:
844:
843:
842:
832:
827:
822:
817:
812:
807:
802:
797:
792:
787:
782:
777:
772:
767:
762:
761:
760:
755:
750:
745:
740:
730:
725:
719:
717:
713:
712:
710:
709:
704:
699:
694:
689:
684:
679:
674:
669:
664:
662:Formal methods
659:
654:
649:
644:
638:
636:
632:
631:
626:
624:
623:
616:
609:
601:
595:
594:
586:
585:External links
583:
580:
579:
572:
554:
547:
525:
518:
500:
493:
467:
446:
413:
406:
394:Addison-Wesley
376:
352:
345:
319:
301:
279:
272:
246:
245:
243:
240:
239:
238:
231:
228:
205:
204:
201:
178:
177:
172:
167:
161:
155:
150:
147:Pre-requisites
144:
139:
133:
127:
121:
107:
104:
91:
88:
67:
64:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1179:
1168:
1165:
1164:
1162:
1147:
1139:
1137:
1129:
1128:
1125:
1119:
1116:
1114:
1111:
1109:
1106:
1104:
1101:
1099:
1096:
1094:
1091:
1090:
1088:
1084:
1074:
1071:
1069:
1066:
1064:
1061:
1059:
1056:
1055:
1053:
1049:
1043:
1040:
1038:
1037:Systems model
1035:
1033:
1030:
1028:
1025:
1023:
1020:
1018:
1015:
1013:
1010:
1008:
1005:
1003:
1000:
998:
995:
994:
992:
988:
982:
979:
977:
974:
972:
969:
967:
964:
962:
959:
957:
954:
952:
949:
947:
944:
942:
939:
937:
934:
932:
929:
927:
924:
922:
919:
917:
914:
912:
909:
908:
906:
904:Developmental
902:
899:
895:
889:
886:
884:
881:
879:
876:
874:
871:
869:
866:
864:
861:
860:
858:
854:
848:
845:
841:
838:
837:
836:
833:
831:
828:
826:
823:
821:
818:
816:
813:
811:
808:
806:
803:
801:
798:
796:
793:
791:
788:
786:
783:
781:
778:
776:
773:
771:
768:
766:
765:Data modeling
763:
759:
756:
754:
751:
749:
746:
744:
741:
739:
736:
735:
734:
731:
729:
726:
724:
721:
720:
718:
714:
708:
705:
703:
700:
698:
695:
693:
690:
688:
685:
683:
680:
678:
675:
673:
670:
668:
665:
663:
660:
658:
655:
653:
650:
648:
645:
643:
640:
639:
637:
633:
629:
622:
617:
615:
610:
608:
603:
602:
599:
592:
589:
588:
584:
575:
573:9780132702621
569:
565:
558:
555:
550:
544:
539:
538:
529:
526:
521:
519:9781780171678
515:
511:
504:
501:
496:
494:1-85032-847-1
490:
486:
481:
480:
471:
468:
457:
453:
449:
447:9781605951676
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
420:
418:
414:
409:
403:
399:
395:
390:
389:
380:
377:
362:
356:
353:
348:
346:9780471120940
342:
338:
333:
332:
323:
320:
315:
311:
305:
302:
297:
290:
283:
280:
275:
269:
265:
261:
257:
251:
248:
241:
237:
234:
233:
229:
227:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
203:Configuration
202:
199:
198:
197:
195:
191:
187:
184:
181:
176:
173:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
154:
153:Test category
151:
148:
145:
143:
142:Actual result
140:
137:
134:
131:
128:
125:
122:
119:
116:
115:
114:
111:
105:
103:
101:
96:
89:
87:
85:
84:postcondition
81:
76:
74:
65:
63:
61:
56:
52:
48:
44:
37:
33:
19:
1032:Object model
1027:Metamodeling
956:Spiral model
856:Orientations
563:
557:
536:
528:
509:
503:
478:
470:
459:. Retrieved
429:
387:
379:
368:. Retrieved
355:
330:
322:
313:
304:
295:
282:
255:
250:
214:
210:
206:
200:Test summary
192:
188:
185:
182:
179:
174:
169:
163:
157:
152:
146:
141:
135:
129:
123:
118:Test case ID
117:
112:
109:
97:
93:
80:precondition
77:
69:
46:
40:
723:Abstraction
396:. pp.
366:. Cem Kaner
314:StickyMinds
194:Test suites
1042:View model
1007:Data model
461:2019-10-22
370:2009-05-07
242:References
224:happy path
164:Automation
130:Test steps
1051:Languages
296:STAR East
220:end-users
170:Pass/fail
47:test case
1161:Category
1146:Category
1012:ER model
878:Ontology
790:Software
716:Concepts
456:15204091
230:See also
18:Testcase
1136:Commons
961:V-model
175:Remarks
897:Models
647:DevOps
635:Fields
570:
545:
516:
491:
454:
444:
404:
343:
270:
158:Author
1073:SysML
997:SPICE
990:Other
951:Scrum
911:Agile
863:Agile
847:CI/CD
485:123–4
452:S2CID
364:(PDF)
292:(PDF)
1058:IDEF
1002:CMMI
888:SDLC
568:ISBN
543:ISBN
514:ISBN
489:ISBN
442:ISBN
402:ISBN
400:–5.
341:ISBN
298:: 2.
268:ISBN
45:, a
1068:USL
1063:UML
941:RAD
916:EUP
434:doi
398:192
260:doi
98:In
41:In
1163::
971:XP
946:UP
487:.
450:.
440:.
428:.
416:^
392:.
339:.
312:.
294:.
266:.
86:.
62:.
620:e
613:t
606:v
576:.
551:.
522:.
497:.
464:.
436::
410:.
373:.
349:.
337:3
316:.
276:.
262::
38:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.