217:
probability and also conforms to a pre-specified pattern, then there are two possible conclusions: intelligent design (this concept is synonymous with human intervention) or necessity, which can be caused by a nonrandom, deterministic force such as natural selection." Pigliucci wrote "Unfortunately, Cambridge
University Press has offered a respectable platform for Dembski to mount his attack on 'materialist science'—which, of course, includes evolution. My hope is that scientists will not dismiss this book as just another craze originating in the intellectual backwaters of America. Neocreationism should be a call to arms for the science community. The battle is already raging, and scientists and educators are still not sure if they should even bother paying attention."
156:, which sets out to establish approaches by which evidence of intelligent agency could be inferred in natural and social situations. In the book he distinguishes between three general modes of competing explanations in order of priority: regularity, chance, and design. The processes in which regularity, chance, and design are ruled out one by one until one remains as a reasonable and sufficient explanation for an event, are what he calls an "explanatory filter". It is a method that tries to eliminate competing explanations in a systematic fashion including when a highly improbable event conforms to a discernible pattern that is given independently of the event itself. This pattern is Dembski's concept of
239:
foundation. There are flaws and cracks that can admit the entry of naturalistic causes into the pool of "designed" events. It is unfortunate that
Dembski's focus is the establishment of "intelligent design" as an anti-evolutionary alternative, for his insights into elimination of chance hypotheses would appear to have legitimate application to various outstanding research questions, such as resolving certain issues in animal cognition and intelligence. Despite Dembski's commentary in his First Things article, there appears to be no justification for the claim that biologists must now admit design (in its old, agency-laden sense) into biological explanation to any greater degree than it is already used.
225:
impulse, and its flaws appear to follow from the need to achieve an anti-evolutionary aim. The anti-evolutionary bent is not as overt here, though, as it is in other works by
Dembski". Elsberry criticizes the book for using a definition of "design" as what is left over after chance and regularity have been eliminated, and for using an argument that excludes
224:
and critic of creationism reviewed the book in 1999. Elsberry described the book as "...a slim and scholarly volume, as one expects from a distinguished academic press clear writing, illustrative examples, and cogent argumentation. The work, though, is motivated and informed by an anti-evolutionary
163:
The filter states that if the thing being examined cannot be explained by regularity, and if it is too statistically unlikely to be explained by chance, and contains "an independently given pattern", then it may be attributed to design. Dembski says his concept is useful to those concerned with
238:
The Design
Inference is a work with great significance for the group of anti-evolutionists who have embraced "intelligent design" as their organizing principle. TDI is supposed to establish the theoretical foundation for all the rest of the movement. My judgment is that it fails to lay a solid
216:
writing, "Too bad he missed the solution to this riddle, which has been proposed several times during the last few centuries, most prominently (and in various fashions) by Hume (1779), Darwin (1859), and
Jacques Monod (1971). According to these thinkers, if a given phenomenon occurs with low
191:'s five year goals of "Thirty published books on design and its cultural implications (sex, gender issues, medicine, law, and religion). Described by the Discovery Institute as offering "a powerful alternative ," the book is touted as being "published by major secular university publishers."
198:
and other fields, argue that they do not find application for
Dembski's explanatory filter and the related concept of specified complexity, but rather base their work upon more prosaic methods and (in the case of SETI) a search for artificial simplicity.
160:. Throughout the book he uses diverse examples such as detectability of spontaneous generation and occurrence of natural phenomena and cases of deceit like ballot rigging, plagiarism, falsification of data, etc.
164:
detecting design in different fields: forensic scientists, detectives, insurance fraud investigators, cryptographers, and SETI investigators, as well theologians and others who argue for the concepts of the
456:
372:
234:
in order to conclude the existence of a designer when in fact natural selection fits
Dembski's argument just as easily. Elsberry concludes:
451:
466:
122:
27:
461:
446:
408:
188:
68:
230:
133:
340:
274:
157:
169:
165:
425:
362:
344:
298:
221:
153:
149:
58:
226:
203:
117:
307:"Information Theory, Evolutionary Computation, and Dembski's "Complex Specified Information""
412:
336:
302:
40:
418:
278:
195:
184:
306:
440:
366:
348:
431:
426:
The advantages of theft over toil: the design inference and arguing from ignorance
261:
313:
26:
212:
400:
101:
97:
327:
Pigliucci, M. (2000). "Chance, necessity, and the war against science".
145:
The Design
Inference: Eliminating Chance through Small Probabilities
432:
Claim CI110: Complex
Specified information indicates design
341:
10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0079:CNATWA]2.3.CO;2
134:
Intelligent Design: The Bridge
Between Science and Theology
148:
is a 1998 book by American philosopher and mathematician
128:
116:
108:
92:
84:
74:
64:
54:
46:
36:
236:
8:
19:
428:by John S. Wilkins and Wesley R. Elsberry.
415:, Christopher Stephens and Elliott Sober.
187:as an example of accomplishing one of the
25:
18:
254:
373:National Center for Science Education
7:
409:How Not to Detect Design (pdf file)
14:
183:is specifically mentioned in the
457:Cambridge University Press books
16:1998 book by William A. Dembski
367:"Review: The Design Inference"
1:
275:"SETI and Intelligent Design"
452:Books by William A. Dembski
419:Dembski's reply to Fitelson
189:intelligent design movement
483:
69:Cambridge University Press
273:Shostak, S (2005-12-01).
194:Some scientists from the
24:
467:Intelligent design books
462:English-language books
447:1998 non-fiction books
247:
20:The Design Inference
402:The Design Inference
365:(March–April 1999).
208:The Design Inference
181:The Design Inference
158:specified complexity
405:– Dembski's website
202:In 2000, biologist
170:Anthropic Principle
166:fine-tuned universe
21:
363:Elsberry, Wesley R
222:Wesley R. Elsberry
154:intelligent design
150:William A. Dembski
80:September 13, 1998
59:Intelligent design
227:natural selection
220:Marine biologist
204:Massimo Pigliucci
152:, a proponent of
141:
140:
85:Publication place
474:
413:Branden Fitelson
389:
388:
386:
385:
359:
353:
352:
324:
318:
317:
311:
295:
289:
288:
286:
285:
270:
264:
259:
245:
129:Followed by
76:Publication date
29:
22:
482:
481:
477:
476:
475:
473:
472:
471:
437:
436:
397:
392:
383:
381:
371:Reports of the
361:
360:
356:
326:
325:
321:
309:
297:
296:
292:
283:
281:
272:
271:
267:
260:
256:
252:
246:
243:
178:
93:Media type
77:
41:William Dembski
32:
17:
12:
11:
5:
480:
478:
470:
469:
464:
459:
454:
449:
439:
438:
435:
434:
429:
423:
422:
421:
406:
396:
395:External links
393:
391:
390:
354:
319:
290:
279:SETI Institute
265:
262:Wedge document
253:
251:
248:
244:Elsberry, 1999
241:
196:SETI Institute
185:Wedge Strategy
177:
174:
139:
138:
130:
126:
125:
120:
114:
113:
110:
106:
105:
94:
90:
89:
86:
82:
81:
78:
75:
72:
71:
66:
62:
61:
56:
52:
51:
48:
44:
43:
38:
34:
33:
30:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
479:
468:
465:
463:
460:
458:
455:
453:
450:
448:
445:
444:
442:
433:
430:
427:
424:
420:
417:
416:
414:
410:
407:
404:
403:
399:
398:
394:
379:
375:
374:
368:
364:
358:
355:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
323:
320:
315:
308:
304:
300:
294:
291:
280:
276:
269:
266:
263:
258:
255:
249:
240:
235:
233:
232:
228:
223:
218:
215:
214:
209:
205:
200:
197:
192:
190:
186:
182:
175:
173:
171:
167:
161:
159:
155:
151:
147:
146:
137:
135:
131:
127:
124:
123:0-521-62387-1
121:
119:
115:
111:
107:
103:
99:
95:
91:
88:United States
87:
83:
79:
73:
70:
67:
63:
60:
57:
53:
49:
45:
42:
39:
35:
28:
23:
401:
382:. Retrieved
377:
370:
357:
332:
328:
322:
299:Elsberry, WR
293:
282:. Retrieved
268:
257:
237:
229:
219:
211:
207:
201:
193:
180:
179:
162:
144:
143:
142:
132:
314:Talk.reason
206:criticized
441:Categories
384:2011-04-24
380:(2): 32–35
329:BioScience
284:2010-08-31
250:References
213:BioScience
335:: 79–81.
303:Shallit J
176:Reception
102:Paperback
98:Hardcover
65:Publisher
349:84354642
242:—
231:a priori
168:and the
47:Language
96:Print (
55:Subject
50:English
347:
136:
37:Author
345:S2CID
310:(PDF)
109:Pages
31:Cover
118:ISBN
100:and
411:by
337:doi
210:in
112:264
443::
378:19
376:.
369:.
343:.
333:50
331:.
312:.
305:.
301:;
277:.
172:.
387:.
351:.
339::
316:.
287:.
104:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
