Knowledge (XXG)

Tse Kwong Lam v Wong Chit Sen

Source 📝

130: 746: 701: 659: 635: 573: 506: 464: 386: 24: 317:, the Kwong Hing Building. It was only shortly advertised with limited details. The reserve price was fixed without the guidance of a qualified valuer at $ 1.2m. There was only one bid. It was Mrs Wong. She was acting on behalf of the company owned by Mr Wong and his family. They had apparently had a board meeting before resolving that they would bid up to a maximum of $ 1.2m. 334:
that although the respondent was free to sell to a company in which he was interested, he had failed to demonstrate he had taken reasonable care in the conduct of the sale. An auction was not necessarily the most appropriate mode of sale. Expert advice should have been sought for valuing and the sale mode. Lord Templeman said:
333:
restored the judge’s award, holding that although the sale could not be set aside, given that too long was taken, damages could be awarded. There was a clear conflict of interest here, importing a necessity to show that reasonable precautions had been taken to get the best price. The Board advised
338:... the sale must be closely examined and a heavy onus lies on the mortgagee to show that in all respects he acted fairly to the borrower and used his best endeavours to obtain the best price reasonably obtainable for the mortgaged property. 862: 320:
The trial Judge found that $ 1.2m was not a proper price, but refused to set the sale aside because of the borrower’s delay in pursuing the counterclaim. He awarded damages instead. The Court of Appeal set aside the judge’s award.
41: 622: 368: 877: 242: 807: 491: 330: 238: 140: 608: 88: 60: 714: 672: 67: 107: 596: 74: 306: 298: 45: 477: 775: 585: 361: 56: 843: 201: 438: 872: 867: 825: 221: 190: 34: 882: 534: 732: 647: 398: 354: 166: 81: 285:
case, concerning the rights and obligations of a mortgagee in the exercise of his power of sale under a
769: 558: 764: 759: 728: 519: 282: 803: 718: 705:
Neither lender nor receivers required by law to extend beyond an ordinary period for sale
162: 690: 562: 218: 129: 840: 822: 612: 524: 429: 250: 246: 198: 187: 676: 856: 278: 495: 538: 481: 745: 23: 751: 741: 452: 254: 442: 415: 425: 286: 548:
G and C Kreglinger v New Patagonia Meat and Cold Storage Company Limited
346: 314: 863:
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council cases on appeal from Hong Kong
639:
Powers of lender in repossession and application of proceeds of sale
350: 17: 313:) property for auction, a building with about 100 units in 510:
The right to redeem and harsh variation of mortgages
305:) exercised his power of sale and put up Mr Tse’s ( 260: 234: 229: 209: 178: 173: 154: 146: 136: 122: 48:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 795: 793: 336: 362: 8: 623:Bristol & West Building Society v Ellis 369: 355: 347: 128: 119: 108:Learn how and when to remove this message 663:Negligent and non-market conduct of sale 430:ss 8-16B, 26-40, 50-88C, 126-136, 140A-B 789: 609:Cheltenham & Gloucester BS v Norgan 492:Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge (No 2) 7: 46:adding citations to reliable sources 715:Silven Ltd v Royal Bank of Scotland 468:Undue Influence and Separate Advice 673:Cuckmere Brick Co v Mutual Finance 14: 810: (on appeal from Hong Kong). 744: 699: 657: 633: 597:Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank plc 571: 504: 462: 455:rr 5-7, Sch 2, para 2(b) and (d) 384: 22: 878:1983 in United Kingdom case law 57:"Tse Kwong Lam v Wong Chit Sen" 33:needs additional citations for 310: 302: 1: 838:Tse Kwong Lam v Wong Chit Sen 820:Wong Chit-Sen v Tse Kwong-Lam 800:Tse Kwong Lam v Wong Chit Sen 776:York Buildings Co v MacKenzie 687:Tse Kwong Lam v Wong Chit Sen 586:Administration of Justice Act 274:Tse Kwong Lam v Wong Chit Sen 216:Tse Kwong Lam v Wong Chit Sen 196:Tse Kwong Lam v Wong Chit Sen 185:Wong Chit-Sen v Tse Kwong-Lam 159:Tse Kwong Lam v Wong Chit Sen 123:Tse Kwong Lam v Wong Chit Sen 844:Court of Appeal of Hong Kong 202:Court of Appeal of Hong Kong 478:Barclays Bank plc v O'Brien 439:Financial Conduct Authority 418:ss 2-28, 56-66, 138 and 150 899: 826:Supreme Court of Hong Kong 239:Lord Fraser Of Tullybelton 222:Supreme Court of Hong Kong 191:Supreme Court of Hong Kong 725: 711: 697: 683: 669: 655: 645: 631: 619: 605: 593: 583: 569: 555: 545: 535:Fairclough v Swan Brewery 531: 516: 502: 488: 474: 460: 450: 436: 423: 413: 406: 396: 382: 265: 127: 648:Law of Property Act 1925 577:Arrears and repossession 399:Law of Property Act 1925 243:Lord Brandon Of Oakbrook 219:[1984] HKCFI 309 841:[1980] HKCA 264 823:[1979] HKCFI 39 199:[1980] HKCA 264 188:[1979] HKCFI 39 804:[1983] UKPC 28 626:(1997) 73 P&CR 158 340: 279:[1983] UKPC 28 163:[1983] UKPC 28 770:English property law 377:Sources on mortgages 42:improve this article 779:(1795) 3 Paton 378 765:English trusts law 873:Property case law 868:1983 in Hong Kong 739: 738: 650:ss 88-89, 101-109 270: 269: 210:Subsequent action 118: 117: 110: 92: 890: 883:Auction case law 847: 835: 829: 817: 811: 797: 760:English land law 754: 749: 748: 729:English land law 703: 702: 661: 660: 637: 636: 575: 574: 520:Vernon v Bethell 508: 507: 466: 465: 388: 387: 371: 364: 357: 348: 312: 304: 230:Court membership 132: 120: 113: 106: 102: 99: 93: 91: 50: 26: 18: 898: 897: 893: 892: 891: 889: 888: 887: 853: 852: 851: 850: 836: 832: 818: 814: 798: 791: 786: 750: 743: 740: 735: 721: 707: 700: 693: 679: 665: 658: 651: 641: 634: 627: 615: 601: 589: 579: 572: 565: 551: 541: 527: 512: 505: 498: 484: 470: 463: 456: 446: 432: 419: 409: 402: 392: 385: 378: 375: 345: 327: 295: 114: 103: 97: 94: 51: 49: 39: 27: 12: 11: 5: 896: 894: 886: 885: 880: 875: 870: 865: 855: 854: 849: 848: 830: 812: 788: 787: 785: 782: 781: 780: 772: 767: 762: 756: 755: 737: 736: 726: 723: 722: 712: 709: 708: 698: 695: 694: 684: 681: 680: 670: 667: 666: 656: 653: 652: 646: 643: 642: 632: 629: 628: 620: 617: 616: 606: 603: 602: 594: 591: 590: 584: 581: 580: 570: 567: 566: 559:Jones v Morgan 556: 553: 552: 546: 543: 542: 532: 529: 528: 517: 514: 513: 503: 500: 499: 489: 486: 485: 475: 472: 471: 461: 458: 457: 451: 448: 447: 437: 434: 433: 424: 421: 420: 414: 411: 410: 407: 404: 403: 397: 394: 393: 383: 380: 379: 376: 374: 373: 366: 359: 351: 344: 341: 326: 323: 294: 291: 268: 267: 263: 262: 258: 257: 255:Sir John Megaw 251:Lord Templeman 247:Lord Brightman 236: 235:Judges sitting 232: 231: 227: 226: 225: 224: 211: 207: 206: 205: 204: 193: 180: 176: 175: 171: 170: 156: 152: 151: 148: 144: 143: 138: 134: 133: 125: 124: 116: 115: 30: 28: 21: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 895: 884: 881: 879: 876: 874: 871: 869: 866: 864: 861: 860: 858: 845: 842: 839: 834: 831: 827: 824: 821: 816: 813: 809: 808:Privy Council 805: 801: 796: 794: 790: 783: 778: 777: 773: 771: 768: 766: 763: 761: 758: 757: 753: 747: 742: 734: 730: 724: 720: 719:EWCA Civ 1409 717: 716: 710: 706: 696: 692: 689: 688: 682: 678: 675: 674: 668: 664: 654: 649: 644: 640: 630: 625: 624: 618: 614: 611: 610: 604: 599: 598: 592: 587: 582: 578: 568: 564: 561: 560: 554: 549: 544: 540: 537: 536: 530: 526: 522: 521: 515: 511: 501: 497: 494: 493: 487: 483: 480: 479: 473: 469: 459: 454: 449: 444: 440: 435: 431: 427: 422: 417: 412: 405: 400: 395: 391: 381: 372: 367: 365: 360: 358: 353: 352: 349: 342: 339: 335: 332: 331:Privy Council 324: 322: 318: 316: 308: 300: 292: 290: 288: 284: 280: 276: 275: 264: 259: 256: 252: 248: 244: 240: 237: 233: 228: 223: 220: 217: 214: 213: 212: 208: 203: 200: 197: 194: 192: 189: 186: 183: 182: 181: 179:Prior actions 177: 172: 168: 164: 160: 157: 153: 149: 145: 142: 141:Privy Council 139: 135: 131: 126: 121: 112: 109: 101: 90: 87: 83: 80: 76: 73: 69: 66: 62: 59: –  58: 54: 53:Find sources: 47: 43: 37: 36: 31:This article 29: 25: 20: 19: 16: 837: 833: 819: 815: 799: 774: 713: 704: 686: 685: 671: 662: 638: 621: 607: 595: 576: 563:EWCA Civ 995 557: 547: 533: 518: 509: 490: 476: 467: 408:and ss 88-91 389: 337: 328: 319: 296: 273: 272: 271: 215: 195: 184: 174:Case history 158: 150:25 July 1983 104: 95: 85: 78: 71: 64: 52: 40:Please help 35:verification 32: 15: 613:EWCA Civ 11 857:Categories 784:References 752:Law portal 677:EWCA Civ 9 453:UTCCR 1999 441:Handbook ( 390:In general 98:March 2019 68:newspapers 733:easements 588:1970 s 36 525:28 ER 838 416:FSMA 2000 297:Mr Wong ( 155:Citations 428:— 426:CCA 1974 401:ss 85-87 343:See also 325:Judgment 287:mortgage 283:land law 266:Mortgage 261:Keywords 691:UKPC 28 523:(1762) 496:UKHL 44 443:MCOB 13 315:Kowloon 307:Chinese 299:Chinese 147:Decided 82:scholar 600:QB 263 539:UKPC 1 482:UKHL 6 309:: 301:: 253:& 167:All ER 84:  77:  70:  63:  55:  802: 550:AC 25 293:Facts 281:is a 277: 165:, 3 161: 137:Court 89:JSTOR 75:books 731:and 727:see 329:The 61:news 311:謝廣林 303:黃直生 44:by 859:: 806:, 792:^ 289:. 249:, 245:, 241:, 169:54 846:. 828:. 445:) 370:e 363:t 356:v 111:) 105:( 100:) 96:( 86:· 79:· 72:· 65:· 38:.

Index


verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Tse Kwong Lam v Wong Chit Sen"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message

Privy Council
[1983] UKPC 28
All ER
[1979] HKCFI 39
Supreme Court of Hong Kong
[1980] HKCA 264
Court of Appeal of Hong Kong
[1984] HKCFI 309
Supreme Court of Hong Kong
Lord Fraser Of Tullybelton
Lord Brandon Of Oakbrook
Lord Brightman
Lord Templeman
Sir John Megaw
[1983] UKPC 28
land law
mortgage
Chinese

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.