1268:
know you've turned down several requests in the past (I was going to ask you a while back, but noticed you had turned down a similar request earlier that same day). I can't imagine what you're waiting for; you're obviously qualified, you have tons of experience, and I bet you'd be in the running for record-setting support votes (I believe 112 is the current record). In fact, I have half a mind to co-opt you under some sort of conscription plan. I hope it will not come to that, however. If you're worried that the rigorous vetting process will turn up your DWI in the '70's, your previous cocaine use, or the fact that you never showed up for your service in the
National Guard, you really needn't worry. I understand people have attained similarly high positions in the world with problems along those very same lines. Well, let me know. And if you're going to say "not yet" you gotta give me some pretty good reason. Well, I'm off to use my new powers to delete every single article from wikipedia (they tried to warn you, but
864:
1355:
editing tools. He has clearly proven he is not a vandal. But I feel like for a lot of people adminship is much more than it is supposed to be. It's all in the name, I suppose. Anyway, a month past my first anniversary at this site and I am talking like an old-timer "back in my day..." I remember when I first discovered adminship it seemed like a big deal, it seemed really cool - back in the days when 1000 edits seemed such a distant goal.
732:
sockpuppet activity of that type). In any event, it is not merely the quality of his law-related contributions, but the fact that he earnestly points to them in his defense that makes me think that he will behave better in the future. This is someone who knows how to make positive contributions, and I have high hopes that he has discovered that the rewards of so doing outweigh any benfits to be derived from disrupting the project. Cheers! --
1307:. Besides, December is not that far off (100 days, by my count, and they do go by quickly), and, quite frankly, I have been too busy to do RC patrol lately, so I rarely run across either persistant vandals or speedy deletion candidates. (I have found AfD candidates while disambiguating, but need no special powers to deal with them). So, for the time being, if I am nominated, I will not run; if I am elected, I will not serve. --
1108:
record, I'd prefer it to happen at a time when I can monitor the proceedings to respond to questions, comments, accusations and the like. If you want to get back to me in a week or so I might be prepared to go ahead then, or have some better idea of when I will be. If the situation changes before then I'll let you know and you can go ahead and put my name forward. Thanks again. -
1525:(I have been tempted occasionally to go through the list and nominate all of those who say they are interested, but who I know will never come close to reaching consensus . Using a deadline and knowing a person's editing habits would give me an easy out...I'm sorry you didn't really want to get nominated at this time, but when you didn't respond...)
1480:
WikiProjects into self-sustaining projects). I have not, and will never do RC patrol. I definitely will not wade into the middle of edit wars or article disputes. I don't want to get involved in speedy deletion work, and certainly don't want to deal with the dysfunctional AFD arena. In my opinion, if
1116:
Hey, BDA. You know, I'm going to be at my parents house doing some painting for a good portion of the next few days. I can use their computer to check up on things pretty regularly, it seems, and I think that will probably suffice. If you want to go ahead with the nomination I'll accept it now, and I
1107:
less active than usual these last few weeks. See, I recently moved and do not have internet access in my new place yet. I'm not entirely sure when I'll be getting it, as there are a bunch of factors I won't go into. Now, since I wouldn't be surprised if my nomination proves not to be the smoothest on
398:
Some questions for you to ponder while you're away for the next week or so... have you ever considered being nominated for admin? And would you like to be nominated for admin? If the answers are both "yes" (or even if the answer to just the second one is "yes"), I'd be only too happy to put your name
1669:
Thank you very much for your support on my nomination for adminship. Now that I have been made an admin, I will do my best to live up to the truest you and the community have placed in me. If you ever see my doing something you think is incorrect or questionable, or does not live up to the standards
1280:
Congratulations again on your well-earned promotion. As for me, I'm afraid my answer will indeed remain "not yet". At the moment, I happily have my hands full with
Wikiprojects, none of which require admin powers. My plan has not changed - I will wait until December, when my current internship comes
833:
Hello how are you on this, another beautiful cloudy South
Florida summer afternoon? As you know, I am relatively new to wikipedia, so if you don't mind I'd like to ask you a few things. First of all, do a lot of attorneys get involved in the formulation of wikipedia procedure? It seems like a lot
1552:
I added my name to the list just because I was proud that I had hit a personal goal of 5,000 total
Knowledge (XXG) edits (next goals are 2,000 and then 2,500 article edits). You're actually lucky that I did catch your message because I had gone off to dinner and hadn't planned on logging back on to
1326:
I came here for another reason, but while I'm here, let me add my $ .02; I concur completely with
Postdlf. Becoming an admin doesn't mean you have to do anything at all. Take a Wikivacation if you want! It's just another arrow in your quiver of helping maintain the place; think of it as an electric
1295:
You know of course that becoming an admin doesn't impose a time quota on you... ; ) It simply will mean that when you see those problems, you'll be empowered to immediately act; the time you would otherwise take dropping someone else a note about a vandal or a speedy deletion candidate would
1760:
Much appreciated, but there is no mistake - I'm on the slow track. I have certain personal benchmarks (both on
Knowledge (XXG) and in my career) that I plan to get past before I'm ready to consider it - which, if everything works out as I expect, will be around the first week of December. Patience
1354:
Your comment about the voting thing made me realise that RFA has run into the same problem as V/AfD - too many professional voters, and these voters are imposing counterproductive rules. Adminship is an editing too, not an administrative tool, in essence. Someone who edits that much has need for
1330:
PS: I don't usually check other User_talk: pages (so that I don't have to monitor a whole long list of User_Talk: pages - one for each person with whom I am having a "conversation"), so please leave any messages for me on my talk page (above); if you leave a message for me here I probably will not
1267:
Thanks again for your nomination and support; it went about as I expected (honestly I had a few other names in my mind I expected to see in the oppose column; they probably didn't notice my nomination). Now I hope you'll let me return the favor and nominate you, though I may have to get in line. I
1070:
Thanks for the support on my RfA. I was very pleasantly surprised to see so much support throughout the week. I've learnt no small part of my V/AfD-ing and interaction from you and a small number of other editors, so your support is particularly good to see. You really should be an admin yourself,
755:
all yesterday, as well as the RfA incident which occurred on
Saturday. I can respect if we simply have differing opinions; I think an editor who has more disruptive edits than positive ones, and who admits to being the sockpuppet of a permablocked user, is a clear-cut liability, regardless of his
632:
Thanks - I deeply appreciate your confidence in my ability to weild the mop, but... I'm starting my new IP-lawyer job on Monday, and I'd like to see how that affects my Wiki-time before I seek any new responsibilities. Besides, the projects that I'm working on don't demand admin powers, and they
522:
Hi BD2412, I know this is a bit overdue, but I wanted to thank you for supporting my RFA. Thanks to you and everyone else who gave me support votes, I am now an admin. The powers that I have been given have been utilized towards helping
Knowledge (XXG), and I want to thank you for giving me that
837:
Next, if this Essjay wants to refer the RfC to arbritration, won't that take a long time? And don't you think referring to arbritration after only 2 days of RfC might not be looked at too kindly by the committee. I mean, most RfCs go unanswered it seems, and not only did I answer mine several
731:
How was
Rainbowwarrior1977 disruptive this morning? His only edits today seem to be responses to the RfC against him. Granted, he's certainly not handling it diplomatically, but he is not being disruptive in the sense of vandalising articles or making pointless VfD's (unless you can point to
592:) Never was a truer word spoken. I feel empowered, yes, but not in the "oooh cool delete button!" way I was kind of expecting. Already I feel the weight of the responsibility I have now been entrusted with, a weight that will no doubt reduce given time. Thank you for believing in me. :)
718:
I saw your comments at the
Rainbowwarrior1977 RfC; I'm confused though. His law related edits were in the middle of his disruption spree, and his most recent disruption was this morning. Did you mean to suggest that he's reformed since then, or am I totally missing something here? --
701:
So how did you like the bar exam? I'm sure you found it easy. The NY bar wasn't that bad, i mean i got a 155 on the MBE in Florida so I'm not that worried about it. Anyway, some admins are harrassing me over some shenanigans I admit were kind of silly concerning my nomination for
1045:
Hi, just a quick note to thank you for your support on my RfA. I was pleased to see so much support, especially from people such as you who I do not know very well, if at all. Now that I am an administrator I will do my best to please the community’s expectations. Best regards,
1014:
Thank you again for your support and putting everything in motion. My experience with Knowledge (XXG) so far has been a rewarding one, and I look forward to lending a hand with the administrative tasks as soon as I become acclimated with these new features.
813:
Honestly, I'm glad to see you sticking to your guns. My interest is in seeing the community grow, and it's refreshing to see someone retaining optimism. I truly hope, if adopted, that your solution works. Unfortunately, I can't say I believe it will.
1436:
Unfortunately the nomination I made yesterday did not go as I had hoped. But there are numerous other contributor's out there who are long overdue from the benefits that administrative permissions can provide. Please join me in my nomination for
613:
Hi - welcome back to the land of the wiki! Hope the exams went well. I'd like to repeat the offer to nominate you for adminship if you're still interested, either now or in a while once you've settled back down to normal again after the exams.
706:. I was wondering if you could help me out? I know we have edited a lot of legal articles together and it would be a shame if they succeeded in driving me away over some childish incident I already admitted. Thanks and all the best.
1117:
think I'll be able to keep an eye on the process to my satisfaction (though I don't think I'll have much time for real editing here, unfortunately; I am missing it). Thanks again. I've become quite curious to see how this turns out. -
1281:
to an end and I find out which city or state I'll be living and working in next. In the interim, if I see a vandal who needs blocking or a nonsense article crying out for speedy deletion, I'll be knocking at your door. Cheers! --
1468:
Although it would be very nice to have the rollback tool, the pages on my watch list get surprisingly little vandalism and spam. Even then it is almost never part of a large vandalism or spam run, so they are easy to clean up.
444:
Thank you for your support on my RFA. Now that I have been promoted, I promise to be as hardworking and fair with the admin tools as I have been with the other areas here on Knowledge (XXG). See you around and happy editing.
1495:
Thank you for the offer, but for now I'd rather not get more involved in the Knowledge (XXG) bureaucracy. (Please note that do admire and appreciate those who are are willing to do the Knowledge (XXG) scullery work.)
485:
Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in
1730:, and I cant seem to find your name there. Frankly, Im appalled. Is there a mistake? Is there a specific reason for this? Is it by choice? Whats up, mmm??? If there is no mistake, please let me nominate you.
834:
of this stuff is quite legalistic actually. I'm doing a bit of research on wikipedia policy and there are simply pages upon pages about committees, arbritration, precedent, procedure, motions, etc. etc....
772:
and his faux admin nomination), that he has often comported himself in an abrasive manner, and the sockpuppetry is troubling. Nevertheless, I choose to maintain my belief that he is on a path to reform.
1485:, you are also volunteering to do your share of the shit work on the Knowledge (XXG) as well (although as far as I can tell, out of close to 600 admins most of the work is done less than 50 of them).
934:
Thanks for you support on my recent RFA. Please let me know if I can help with any administrative responsibilities, or if you have any problems with the way I use the admin tools. Cheers. --
1071:
you know, though I know you've decided not be for the time being. Anyway, please do keep an eye on me and my logs, especially while I'm learning the ropes with the new buttons. Thanks again! -
1331:
see it. I know not everyone uses this style (they would rather keep all the text of a thread in one place), but I simply can't monitor all the User_talk: pages I leave messages on. Thanks!
1488:
So I will keep doing my occasional vandal rollbacks by hand, I'll welcome some of the new editors that show up on my watchlist, and I will very occasionally deal with problem editors (
877:. I've been promoted, and I promise to wield the mop with good faith, patience, and fairness... except when I'm exterminating vandals with the M-16 recoilless nuclear Gatling mop. --
838:
times, but they choose to ignore everything and simply move to the ArbCom. I think these folks might enjoy all this debating as much (or more so) than they think I do. Take care,
768:
Granted, that's not the best behavior, but tasteless posts on user talk pages are mostly harmless. I concede that he has made some genuinely disruptive edits (including his vfd of
464:! I was pleasantly surprised by the sheer number of supporters (including several people that usually disagree with my opinion). I shall do my best with the proverbial mop. Yours,
801:
I'm afraid this guy has figured out how to get under your skin. I'm not backing off my earlier assessment, but neither am I going to put any further effort into defending him. --
1458:
703:
417:
Ok, I'll try to remember to ask again later :). I must admit that three months in wikipedia is a short time, but you seem to have taken to it like the proverbial duck to
1367:
I was wondering what happened to your RfA proposal - it looks like it already got archived! I wanted to apologize for being so terse in my comment there. Anyway, take care!
1103:
I'd certainly appreciate a nomination; thanks for thinking of me. Unfortunately the timing is sort of bad. If you look at my recent contributions you'll notice I have been
846:
I'm afraid my experience with RfC's and ArbCom is terribly limited. This is actually the first RfC I've ever stepped into - but I don't think the time frame is unusual. --
1472:
On the other hand, I have no interest right now in getting more involved in the tedious backstage maintenance work on the Knowledge (XXG) (other than trying to turn the
1826:
Ah, gotcha. Tregoweth and I were sort of "instant messaging" each other, so he should be answering soon. Thanks for letting me know so that I can nominate "Gene." -
644:
Fair enough. I thought you'd need sopme time to settle back into things anyway. If you change your mind, let me know (and don't be surprised if I ask again sometime!)
1520:
Quite frankly, right now your message looks a little too much like a threat...Respond or I'll nominate you. You should at least change it to 24 hrs instead or 12 hrs.
1296:
simply be spent directly enacting the solution. Are you really that firmly in the "If I am nominated, I will not run; if I am elected, I will not serve" mindset?
98:
90:
1381:
Thank you very much for your vote on my RFA, it is now the 8th most supported RFA ever, and it couldnt have happened without your vote. I look forward to serving
94:
86:
673:. I was quite surprised by the amount of support I received, and wish to extend my thanks to you for taking the time to support my nomination for adminship. --
874:
1815:
Thanks...I thought I was losing my mind! He did accept via my talk page; I was on my way to let him know the nomination was up. I'd like to do the same for
1442:
1429:
1417:
will be doing all of the real work. He would have responded to you directly, but he is currently out of town, and wanted to thank you asap. Thanks again. --
1181:
670:
53:
560:
Thank you for your support for my adminship. I'm honored that you took the time from your studying to participate. Best of luck on your exam. Cheers, -
49:
41:
130:
1462:
134:
126:
1844:
1243:
118:
110:
73:
65:
114:
77:
69:
61:
582:
From everyone who has been given much, much will be demanded; and from the one who has been entrusted with much, much more will be asked.
82:
1727:
1131:
572:
Hello, just a quick note to express my gratitude for your support of my RfA. I'm sure I'll become a familiar face on places like the
789:
I'm not so worried about the RfC at this point, as I'm sure this is going to continue until the ArbCom is required to intervene. --
1840:
1588:
1033:
Thank you for supporting my request for adminship. I was granted my superpowers earlier today. :) *shoots sparks across room*
1134:
has not quite completed yet, but either way, I'd like to thank you for your vote and your support, regardless of the outcome. --
487:
1847:!! I was surprised at the turnout and support I got! If you ever have any issues with any of my actions, please notify me on my
138:
1413:
RfA. He appreciates your support and comments and looks forward to better serving Knowledge (XXG) the best he can. Of course
949:
Holy smokes - who would've thunk it? I imagine I'm at the end of a long line of folks who would volunteer to nominate you. --
45:
37:
1255:
I thank you for your support for my RfA, We shall surely interact more. I am certain that our association shall grow. --
122:
1482:
756:
few-and-far between good edits (which, by the way, anyone with a copy of Blacks Law Dictionary could have made). --
1751:
NOOOOOOOO! Let me nominate :)!!!! (Kidding, if journalist wants to that's fine - or we could co-nominate!!!).
915:
1239:
593:
102:
57:
1710:
744:
Sorry, not this morning; when you spend hour after hour here, it begins to blend together. I was thinking of
991:
987:
839:
707:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
1684:
Thank you for your support on my RfA. I believe your comments made a real difference in the final outcome.
1090:
919:
1630:
1604:
881:
1343:
1203:
1184:
page, as it was out of the place of any discussion. I wish you happiness and prosperity, tho. Cheers! --
1865:
Thank you so much for adding your support to my adminship nomination. I promise not to let you down.
1003:
Congratulations - you really knocked it out of the park! I know you'll keep up your good work here. --
817:
I wouldn't say he's "gotten under my skin"; I just hate to see Knowledge (XXG) disrupted this way. --
390:
This archive relates to discussions relating to Requests for Administration and Requests for Comment.
1871:
1742:
1568:
1540:
1511:
1397:
1234:
904:
Please never hesitate to let me know if you have concerns with any administrative action I may make.
496:
1704:
1167:
938:
547:
532:
528:
561:
1674:
1658:
986:
In case you were wondering the real truth behind all the B.S., you can check my user page now at
678:
651:
621:
468:
428:
406:
1083:
Hi, thanks for voting for me in my RFA. I was really touched at how many people voted for me! --
1802:
1778:
1446:
1138:
1016:
962:
863:
449:
1477:
1465:, I am only listed under "All namespaces" (3067 edits) and not under "Main namespace edits".
1767:
1340:
1316:
1290:
1218:
1193:
1142:
1047:
1009:
955:
852:
822:
807:
794:
779:
761:
738:
724:
639:
511:
1473:
1058:
Hey BD2412, thanks for your vote on my recent RFA, your support was appreciated :) --
577:
1868:
1816:
1731:
1688:
1554:
1526:
1497:
1386:
1209:
Thanks - I thought you meant to, but I couldn't move it there based on my hunch. Peace. --
491:
1233:
Thank you for your support in my successful RfA. I hope I can live up to expectations. -
573:
1827:
1820:
1356:
1339:
Just to say thanks for supporting my RfA. Please let me know if you see me screw up. --
1162:
1088:
1034:
935:
911:
878:
601:
585:
544:
524:
490:? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list. Thanks. --
1671:
1655:
1489:
1438:
1273:
1118:
1109:
674:
645:
615:
465:
422:
400:
1654:
I just wanted to thank you for your vote of support in my request for adminship! --
1848:
1797:
1773:
1297:
1256:
1135:
446:
1382:
689:
thanks for your vote of confidence on my RFA. Who's that banging on the bongoes?--
399:
forward once you return (or before, if you prefer). Let me know on my user page.
1762:
1623:
Whoops, I didn't see you had already thanked me for the disambig before. Sorry!
1422:
1414:
1308:
1282:
1210:
1185:
1072:
1004:
950:
847:
818:
802:
790:
774:
769:
757:
733:
720:
690:
634:
506:
17:
1685:
1059:
1635:
1625:
1609:
1599:
1580:
1084:
907:
893:
471:
1418:
1410:
1406:
975:
1853:
1839:
1753:
1587:
1369:
974:
Hiya. Just wanted to thank you for supporting my recent RfA. Cheers! --
1180:
Hi, sorry but I had to delete your signature from the bottom of the
1701:
I linked up my RfA this evening. Thanks again for the nomination!
1597:
Oh, and I disambiguated "album" on my user page per your request.
862:
1304:
702:
administratorship. However, now they filed an RfC against me
589:
990:. And less than a month before you find out your scores too!
1586:
898:
Hehe, I had starting wondering about that myself. ;-)
461:
1670:
that should be expected of an admin, please let me know.
1459:
Knowledge (XXG):List of non-admins with high edit counts
923:
786:
752:
748:
745:
1594:Hi BD2412, thank you for your support on my RfA!
1153:Hey, BDA! Thank you for your support on my RfA.
669:Thank you for your vote of support on my recent
505:Thanks, but I'm not ready for it yet. Cheers, --
1796:Thanks for letting me know, I've CC'd Alkivar.
1443:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/23skidoo
1182:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/R. fiend
580:, as well as the murkier parts of my new job. "
543:Hi BD2412! Thanks for supporting my adminship!
901:Thank you very much for your support. :)
8:
1772:Hope that includes some Featured articles.
633:fairly fully occupy the time I have now! --
961:Thank you, I'm quite flattered. :)
460:Thank you for voting on my RFA. Have some
1461:. Part of the problem may be that in the
1728:Knowledge (XXG):List of administrators
1553:the Knowledge (XXG) after I got back.
1463:list of Wikipedians by number of edits
1457:I don't think that I was ever on the
1409:'s RfA== Thank you for supporting my
7:
926: ) 19:18, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
1425:?¿? 21:01, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
1834:Thanks for your support on my RfA!
24:
421:water. Good luck with the exams!
34:By topic (prior to June 1, 2009):
1838:
1636:
1626:
1610:
1600:
873:Thank you for voting to support
394:Some questions for you to ponder
1803:
1798:
1779:
1774:
1569:
1566:
1560:
1541:
1538:
1532:
1512:
1509:
1503:
1449:21:09, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
1373:21:14, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
1359:14:28, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
1346:19:04, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
1300:18:02, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
1292:17:58, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
1276:17:09, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
1259:10:54, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
1247:00:13, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
1195:21:29, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
1172:15:30, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
1145:18:26, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
1112:17:55, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
1095:22:48, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
1075:00:05, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
146:Dated (beginning June 1, 2009):
1843:Thanks for your support of my
1761:pays - after all, time flies!
1743:
1738:
1735:
1732:
1398:
1393:
1390:
1387:
1318:18:22, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
1220:04:41, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
1121:17:04, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
1062:11:55, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
1050:17:01, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
892:I was starting to wonder when
1:
1878:21:44, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
1857:04:17, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
1830:05:40, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
1823:05:35, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
1631:
1605:
1555:
1527:
1516:04:00, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
1498:
1011:17:10, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
957:23:28, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
941:00:36, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
25:
1807:07:47, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
1769:03:25, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
1757:03:22, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
1747:03:19, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
1715:23:01, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
1693:22:00, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
1676:15:27, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
1661:05:04, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
1615:16:14, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
1481:you accept a nomination for
1402:00:06, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
1037:14:56, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
994:06:37, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
978:19:37, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
883:07:50, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
825:03:44, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
797:03:15, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
764:16:00, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
727:15:37, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
1783:07:47, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
1641:02:06, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
1573:04:46, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
1545:04:22, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
1327:attachment for your broom.
1303:Sir, I am as stubborn as a
1019:17:36, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
965:17:11, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
854:22:40, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
842:19:05, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
809:03:37, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
781:16:11, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
740:15:52, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
710:04:59, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
693:09:06, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
681:12:20, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
641:17:07, July 30, 2005 (UTC)
574:Administrator's Noticeboard
481:lots of edits, not an admin
1896:
628:05:20, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
596:10:34, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
564:06:20, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
535:23:55, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
501:22:59, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
1702:
1492:is my current project).
658:19:50, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
604:20:30, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
552:13:39, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
477:08:02, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
413:02:39, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
1229:Thank you for your vote.
568:thanks for supporting me
513:23:03, 2005 Jun 11 (UTC)
452:00:33, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
435:03:01, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
1665:Thanks for your support
1041:Thanks for your support
988:User:Rainbowwarrior1977
859:Thanks for your support
600:Same for me. Thanks----
539:Thanks for your support
456:Thanks for your support
1726:I was looking through
1591:
1029:Thanks for the support
886:
870:
578:Requests for Adminship
1590:
1272:bwaa-ha-ha-ha-ha!). -
866:
1744:>>talk<<
1399:>>talk<<
1270:you wouldn't listen!
1722:Youre not an admin?
1579:
1478:Southern California
1428:
1148:
1125:
1065:
1053:
929:
1592:
992:Rainbowwarrior1977
896:would get a nom...
887:Func's RfA :)
871:
840:Rainbowwarrior1977
708:Rainbowwarrior1977
1883:
1882:
1856:
1756:
1445:. Best regards,
1385:. Again, thanks.
1372:
1246:
1201:I voted support.
1161:
657:
627:
550:
500:
434:
412:
1887:
1877:
1852:
1851:! Thanks again!
1842:
1805:
1800:
1781:
1776:
1765:
1752:
1745:
1740:
1737:
1734:
1714:
1707:
1638:
1633:
1628:
1612:
1607:
1602:
1571:
1567:
1564:
1559:
1543:
1539:
1536:
1531:
1514:
1510:
1507:
1502:
1453:Lots of edits...
1441:'s adminship at
1400:
1395:
1392:
1389:
1368:
1314:
1288:
1237:
1216:
1191:
1170:
1165:
1160:
1156:
1143:HOWS MY DRIVING)
1092:
1007:
998:Congratulations!
953:
868:The mop is mine!
850:
805:
785:Allow me to add
777:
736:
654:
649:
637:
624:
619:
548:
509:
494:
475:
431:
426:
409:
404:
26:
1895:
1894:
1890:
1889:
1888:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1866:
1863:
1836:
1817:User:Gene Poole
1813:
1794:
1763:
1724:
1718:
1705:
1699:
1691:
1682:
1667:
1652:
1585:
1455:
1434:
1379:
1365:
1352:
1337:
1309:
1283:
1265:
1253:
1235:Trevor MacInnis
1231:
1211:
1186:
1178:
1168:
1163:
1158:
1151:
1149:Android79's RfA
1128:
1101:
1093:
1081:
1068:
1056:
1043:
1031:
1025:
1005:
1000:
984:
972:
951:
947:
932:
930:BaronLarf's RFA
889:
861:
848:
831:
829:Good Afternoon!
803:
775:
734:
716:
699:
687:
667:
652:
635:
622:
611:
570:
558:
541:
520:
507:
483:
473:
458:
442:
429:
407:
396:
143:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1893:
1891:
1881:
1880:
1862:
1859:
1835:
1832:
1812:
1809:
1793:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1723:
1720:
1706:brighterorange
1698:
1695:
1689:
1681:
1678:
1666:
1663:
1651:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1584:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1547:
1546:
1522:
1521:
1454:
1451:
1433:
1427:
1378:
1375:
1364:
1361:
1351:
1348:
1336:
1333:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1264:
1261:
1252:
1249:
1230:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1177:
1174:
1150:
1147:
1127:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1100:
1097:
1089:
1080:
1077:
1067:
1064:
1055:
1052:
1042:
1039:
1030:
1027:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
999:
996:
983:
980:
971:
968:
967:
966:
946:
943:
931:
928:
888:
885:
860:
857:
856:
855:
830:
827:
811:
810:
783:
782:
742:
741:
715:
712:
698:
695:
686:
683:
666:
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
610:
607:
606:
605:
569:
566:
557:
554:
540:
537:
519:
516:
515:
514:
482:
479:
457:
454:
441:
440:My RFA: Thanks
438:
437:
436:
395:
392:
388:
387:
330:
269:
208:
147:
142:
141:
80:
35:
32:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1892:
1879:
1875:
1874:
1870:
1860:
1858:
1855:
1850:
1846:
1841:
1833:
1831:
1829:
1824:
1822:
1818:
1810:
1808:
1806:
1801:
1791:
1782:
1777:
1771:
1770:
1768:
1766:
1759:
1758:
1755:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1746:
1741:
1729:
1721:
1719:
1716:
1712:
1708:
1703:—
1696:
1694:
1692:
1687:
1679:
1677:
1675:
1673:
1664:
1662:
1660:
1657:
1649:
1640:
1639:
1634:
1629:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1614:
1613:
1608:
1603:
1595:
1589:
1582:
1572:
1565:
1563:
1558:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1544:
1537:
1535:
1530:
1524:
1523:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1515:
1508:
1506:
1501:
1493:
1491:
1490:User:Ronald20
1486:
1484:
1479:
1475:
1470:
1466:
1464:
1460:
1452:
1450:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1439:User:23skidoo
1431:
1426:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1412:
1408:
1403:
1401:
1396:
1384:
1376:
1374:
1371:
1362:
1360:
1358:
1349:
1347:
1345:
1342:
1334:
1332:
1328:
1317:
1315:
1313:
1306:
1302:
1301:
1299:
1294:
1293:
1291:
1289:
1287:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1275:
1271:
1262:
1260:
1258:
1250:
1248:
1245:
1241:
1236:
1228:
1219:
1217:
1215:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1194:
1192:
1190:
1183:
1175:
1173:
1171:
1166:
1157:You're next.
1154:
1146:
1144:
1140:
1137:
1133:
1126:Bmicomp's RfA
1120:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1111:
1106:
1098:
1096:
1094:
1086:
1078:
1076:
1074:
1063:
1061:
1051:
1049:
1040:
1038:
1036:
1028:
1026:
1018:
1013:
1012:
1010:
1008:
1002:
1001:
997:
995:
993:
989:
981:
979:
977:
969:
964:
960:
959:
958:
956:
954:
945:Not an admin?
944:
942:
940:
937:
927:
925:
921:
917:
913:
909:
905:
902:
899:
897:
895:
884:
882:
880:
876:
869:
865:
858:
853:
851:
845:
844:
843:
841:
835:
828:
826:
824:
820:
815:
808:
806:
800:
799:
798:
796:
792:
788:
780:
778:
771:
767:
766:
765:
763:
759:
754:
750:
747:
739:
737:
730:
729:
728:
726:
722:
713:
711:
709:
705:
696:
694:
692:
684:
682:
680:
676:
672:
664:
656:
655:
647:
643:
642:
640:
638:
631:
630:
629:
626:
625:
617:
609:Welcome back!
608:
603:
599:
598:
597:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
575:
567:
565:
563:
555:
553:
551:
546:
538:
536:
534:
530:
526:
523:opportunity.
517:
512:
510:
504:
503:
502:
498:
493:
489:
480:
478:
476:
470:
467:
463:
455:
453:
451:
448:
439:
433:
432:
424:
420:
416:
415:
414:
411:
410:
402:
393:
391:
386:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
331:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
270:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
209:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
148:
145:
144:
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
81:
79:
75:
71:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
43:
39:
36:
33:
30:
29:
28:
27:
19:
1872:
1864:
1837:
1825:
1814:
1795:
1764: BD2412
1725:
1717:
1700:
1683:
1668:
1653:
1650:Gyrofrog RfA
1624:
1598:
1596:
1593:
1561:
1556:
1533:
1528:
1504:
1499:
1494:
1487:
1471:
1467:
1456:
1447:Hall Monitor
1435:
1404:
1380:
1366:
1353:
1338:
1329:
1325:
1311:
1285:
1269:
1266:
1254:
1232:
1213:
1202:
1188:
1179:
1155:
1152:
1129:
1104:
1102:
1082:
1069:
1066:Splash's RfA
1057:
1044:
1032:
1024:
1017:Hall Monitor
1006: BD2412
985:
973:
963:Hall Monitor
952: BD2412
948:
933:
906:
903:
900:
891:
890:
872:
867:
849: BD2412
836:
832:
816:
812:
804: BD2412
784:
776: BD2412
743:
735: BD2412
717:
700:
688:
668:
650:
636: BD2412
620:
612:
581:
571:
559:
542:
521:
508: BD2412
484:
459:
443:
427:
418:
405:
397:
389:
106:
1854:Ryan Norton
1754:Ryan Norton
1370:Ryan Norton
1054:Joolz's RFA
1048:Sam Hocevar
982:Hi Whats up
770:Ainu people
685:Yet another
18:User:BD2412
1686:Owen×
1474:California
1350:RFA voting
556:RfA thanks
492:Rick Block
1849:talk page
1845:adminship
1828:Lucky 6.9
1821:Lucky 6.9
1811:Tregoweth
1656:Gyrofrog
1483:adminship
1383:wikipedia
1357:Guettarda
1251:Thank you
1244:Contribs)
1099:Adminship
879:malathion
697:Congrats!
602:Keetoowah
545:Sjakkalle
525:Linuxbeak
518:Thank you
488:this list
474:>|<
139:Vandalism
1869:Denelson
1799:=Nichalp
1775:=Nichalp
1430:23skidoo
1274:R. fiend
1119:R. fiend
1110:R. fiend
675:Longhair
646:Grutness
616:Grutness
549:(Check!)
423:Grutness
401:Grutness
46:Deletion
38:Articles
31:Archives
1804:«Talk»=
1780:«Talk»=
1690:☎
1570:∅
1542:∅
1513:∅
1411:masters
1298:Postdlf
1257:Bhadani
1164:android
1136:BMIComp
1091:tɔktəmi
970:Thanks!
918:,
914:,
910:(
594:Garrett
588:12:48,
562:Willmcw
447:Zzyzx11
1876:
1867:
1861:My RfA
1792:Thanks
1697:My RFA
1680:My RfA
1659:(talk)
1581:Jaxl's
1432:'s RFA
1377:My RFA
1363:Whoops
1312:BD2412
1310:
1286:BD2412
1284:
1263:My RfA
1214:BD2412
1212:
1189:BD2412
1187:
1132:my RfA
1130:Well,
1079:My RFA
1073:Splash
1035:Coffee
924:
875:my RFA
819:Essjay
791:Essjay
758:Essjay
721:Essjay
691:Jondel
665:Thanks
469:adiant
450:(Talk)
1562:Verse
1557:Blank
1534:Verse
1529:Blank
1505:Verse
1500:Blank
1204:Erwin
1176:sorry
1139:(talk
1060:Joolz
936:Baron
787:this.
753:this,
749:this,
746:this,
419:syrup
123:Tools
83:Misc.
16:<
1819:. -
1739:list
1736:urna
1711:talk
1476:and
1394:list
1391:urna
1305:mule
1240:Talk
1105:much
1085:Angr
939:Larf
908:Func
894:Func
823:Talk
795:Talk
762:Talk
751:and
725:Talk
704:here
679:Talk
653:wha?
623:wha?
586:Luke
576:and
533:Desk
529:Talk
497:talk
430:wha?
408:wha?
1733:→Jo
1672:DES
1627:Rob
1601:Rob
1583:RfA
1423:mop
1421:'s
1419:Who
1407:Who
1388:→Jo
1344:(?)
1341:Doc
1335:RfA
1159:;-)
976:Ngb
821:·
793:·
760:·
723:·
714:RFC
671:RfA
648:...
618:...
590:NIV
584:" (
462:pie
425:...
403:...
385:059
381:058
377:057
373:056
369:055
365:054
361:053
357:052
353:051
349:050
345:049
341:048
337:047
333:046
328:045
324:044
320:043
316:042
312:041
308:040
304:039
300:038
296:037
292:036
288:035
284:034
280:033
276:032
272:031
267:030
263:029
259:028
255:027
251:026
247:025
243:024
239:023
235:022
231:021
227:020
223:019
219:018
215:017
211:016
206:015
202:014
198:013
194:012
190:011
186:010
182:009
178:008
174:007
170:006
166:005
162:004
158:003
154:002
150:001
135:3rd
131:2nd
127:1st
119:4th
107:1st
103:RfA
99:4th
87:1st
78:5th
74:4th
62:1st
58:Law
50:1st
42:1st
1873:83
1637:rt
1611:rt
1405:==
1242:|
1169:79
1141:,
773:--
677:|
531:|
527:|
115:3d
111:2d
95:3d
91:2d
70:3d
66:2d
54:2d
1713:)
1709:(
1632:e
1606:e
1415:I
1238:(
1087:/
922:,
920:e
916:c
912:t
499:)
495:(
472:_
466:R
383:-
379:-
375:-
371:-
367:-
363:-
359:-
355:-
351:-
347:-
343:-
339:-
335:-
326:-
322:-
318:-
314:-
310:-
306:-
302:-
298:-
294:-
290:-
286:-
282:-
278:-
274:-
265:-
261:-
257:-
253:-
249:-
245:-
241:-
237:-
233:-
229:-
225:-
221:-
217:-
213:-
204:-
200:-
196:-
192:-
188:-
184:-
180:-
176:-
172:-
168:-
164:-
160:-
156:-
152:-
137:/
133:-
129:-
125:-
121:/
117:-
113:-
109:-
105:-
101:/
97:-
93:-
89:-
85:-
76:-
72:-
68:-
64:-
60:-
56:/
52:-
48:-
44:/
40:-
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.