1858:
this by first directing every one to
Poaceae and then the others on to the disambiguatin page, this sort of complicated, roundabout way of doing things was the purpose of having the more direct approach of using a disambiguation page (a wikipedia standard method), with the only clear advantage being your sense that "most" users would not have to make a series of steps to get where they wanted to in the first place. I think generally such redirect lines at the start of an article are to be avoided if possibble (not always possible) as is your second guessing user proportions. Personally, I think more users will go on to the Grass disambiguation page than the Poaceae page, so I would even question your basis for making the changes in the first place. -
1726:
and number of edits associated with an article, so you might not have to worry about preventing these articles from showing up at the top of your list the next time around. If you want to make it more than a triage-only listing, editors can be instructed to remove listings only after substantial improvements have been made, though after a few editors touch them, articles will no longer appear at the top of your list. If you are just doing triage, though, you might want to exclude articles that are already flagged for some kind of cleanup, if they clog up the list. (I'm guessing that won't happen, but you never know.) –
1564:
1522:
1355:...is very cool, but I think if I were a newbie, I'd be confused as to whether "Journalist" (as it appears at the top) was a username or some kind of automatic welcoming bot (now there's an idea"). Also, why does the template contain a template? You could have just as easily copied the text of the {{welcome}} template into your own. Just curious. Cheers! ~~| BD2412 talk 14:49, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
565:
458:
416:
529:. This is easily fixed (well, the duplication; the bug is still unresolved, I'm afraid), but there's also an easy way to avoid: if you get back an error that the server "gave no response", open the article history in a new tab or window instead. If it shows your edit, you can ignore the error. If not, you can resubmit.
2036:. I don't think we need to move dabs to a bottom section. It will be trival at the end to get a bot to touch the dabs - and the bot can just use the orginal list. So I'm going to just remove (delete) the entries I've completed. If you diagree I can always go back and put the ones I've done in the completed list.--
2161:
Thank you for resolving the misunderstanding which originated when it was suggested that the page be retitled. Frankly, I have no understanding of why they are pressing for a merger or to avoid using
Conflict, but we seemed to lack any common ground for an exchange of views so your input has saved me
2094:
again. Unfortunately, the dab broke the formatting of the rest of the page, so I have reverted to the un-dab'ed version. (And asked the author of the EasyTimeline thingy for help). So when you fix a timeline, please check to make sure it doesn't break the formatting. I hope we'll figure out soon why
1857:
are contrary to the purposes of a disambiguation page. To say "grass" has some overwhelming meaning is invalid, since you cannot predict what the majority of users coming from a search for "grass" will be seeking by using a term obviously in need of disambiguation. Although I see that you would fix
1283:
A list is brewing now, based on the 9 Sep 2005 database dump. There is another DB dump in progress now, though might take a few days before I have a list ready from that one. (The list does not check whether parameterized links are valid, BTW.) Is there anywhere in particular I should post this?
981:
I'd like to generate a list of long-dormant files, e.g. those that have had no edits in over a year (or maybe several lists sorted by length of dormancy). My theory is that long-untouched files must either already be done (unlikely), or may have been forgotten and possibly fallen out of date. I also
2068:
I don't know why you put the smiley after claiming that you'd do "the extra 32,806", you were being deadly serious. I'd like to see a mediawiki feature where uopn saving it warned you if a page has any wikilinks to dab pages - it would really bring the community's attention to the project. Alas, it
1994:
but when I try to invoke it with the {{}} it modifies the entire page rather than simply inserting itself as an infobox. Obviouslly I am making a simple mistake but cannot immediately identify it. If you approve the template, could you show me how to invoke it. Many thanks in anticipation and sorry
1929:
Yes, I'm aware that the version to which I made disambiguation repairs was the BJAODN version - however, those disambig repairs do not change the outward appearance of the article which is the basis for it being in BJAODN at all. Instead, what they do is to make it easier for editors working on the
1697:
Then you would then be able to try combinations of various variables to see how many articles would be included by various criteria. Though I think you might do well just to come up with a ranked list. I would recommend sorting by number of editors first, then by number of edits, then by creation
1175:
I've written a script that does the job the easy way (via computer), but it considers articles with a ":" in the title to be non-MAIN namespace. Do you think this is an acceptable error and that I could update the counts at Dab's with links using the script? By the way, it calculates
American to be
1938:
projects to disambiguate all the regular, non-joke articles by making the "what links here" screens for those disambig pages less crowded - articles really in need of fixing are thereby made easier to spot. Although I agree that the joke page ought not be edited for content, the primary mission of
1725:
and whatnot. If your listing is going to be triage-only, you can have people delete the listing once they've applied a cleanup tag, since then they will be brought to the attention of other editors through the normal cleanup process. Adding such a tag will actually increase the number of editors
1473:
Fixed. There is a way for admins to move selected edits to a seperate page (keeping edit summaries and everything), but I haven't figured out how quite yet. If you want me to do that and do the move to keep the edit history that's fine, but I've seen alot of cut/paste archives, so I don't think it
491:
When the VfD period runs out, the bot ports the /temp page over properly. When the deciding admin finally closes the discussion, he/she will (hopefully) re-transclude the discussion onto the archive page. Thanks again for your help. We just want to make sure the bot keeps running correctly each
1359:
Thanks for the notice. You know, Ive had the problem before when others thought that I was a bot that automatically welcomes new users. In my old welcome message, I had to write a small note telling that person that I was 100% real. In addition, the template in my template is a bit lazy huh? Ill
439:
Hi again - yes, the categories are the same, but there's a set hierarchy for them to fit into (I've edited the two you mentioned). There are two problems, though. The first is that you'll have to do a null edit on all the articles you've put stubs on in order for them to appear in the categories
400:
Hi - I note your new template for law school stubs. It's a good idea to have such a category, but two things for future reference: 1) there's no point having a stub template if it doesn't link to a specific stub category (I've added one); 2) Stub categories are usually debated before creation at
1904:
Hey
Dabrams, could you check out the move request on the above page? It seems like an obvious move (I actually did it unilaterally, but got shouted down, so I brought it to requested moves) but almost no one's voting on it. Another vote or two should establish a conensus, I guess. Thanks.
1641:
total edits, the idea being that this will smoke out junk that was dropped in and forgotten. Say, for the sake of argument, that x is a year and y is 3 total edits - can this be done? Can it be done in a plug-in-the-variable sense, to get an idea of the scope using different variables?
1360:
write it over ASAP (maybe in the evening, Im now at school, using one of the computers in the library —talk about being addicted to
Knowledge (XXG) :)). Ill include my personal welcome message. Maybe then I can let people know that Im real. Thanks again for the note.
1435:
The
Challenge seemed so promising but with just two people signed up I don't think the community is ready for it. I guess we should put a notice on top of the page saying that the idea has been shelved, and try again in the distant future. Shame, it was a great idea.
2195:
OK, I think that's fixed now. I suspect you weren't breaking the template, it's just that the rendering - I found when I created it - is rather temperamental and it's a bit of a coin-toss as to whether it appears when you preview/save. Cheers for the feedback.
1734:
My main concern is in removing "bad stuff" from
Knowledge (XXG). I like the idea of assigning a score based on variables, and the only thing I can think to add (in retrospect) is a factor that would take the length of the article into account (also captured by
1816:
See edit ;-) Any idea why they don't appear? (I tried using preview to move them(the language links) around the article, but regardless of where the links were (in the article) they didn't appear in the preview. Did you change your sig? Nice T
1704:
Stuff that's so bad it needs to be deleted is pretty much taken care of - it won't show up on the next report, and in the meantime, everyone will be able to see that it is a redlink. I expect that people will start to triage the articles, and add
1291:
It would help to sort out most wanted articles mentioned in text as opposed to transclusions. Also, redlinks in templates tend to be part of a series of similar articles, and can be easy to fill in once the context of the link is apparent.
472:
Since you've taken an interest in helping to untransclude the really long discussions from the main VfD page, we should talk about the mechanics. The technique you are using - replacing the text right on the log page - will cause
1869:. Since you refuse to discusss, I'll let you proceed (its your time), but you are essentially reversing efforts that were done a year or more ago to settle essentially the argument you are now assuming without discussion -
1968:
Hi
Tedernst - saw you dabbed this to ]. It applies as much or more to Native Americans in what is now Mexico than the US, but was relevant on both sides of the modern border. What's the best to use in that scenario? -
1097:
Yes, though I'm waiting for a new database dump to be completed. I hear on IRC that one is currently in progress, so hopefully we'll be able to get updated reports of many kinds in the next few days. –
982:
suspect that there may be many one-time posting of notes on anon user pages that can be done away with altogether. I lack the technical capacity to generate any kind of list, tho - can you guide me on this? Cheers! --
702:
In what conceivable sense of the word is it "disambuigation link repair" to change the link to a redirect page that points to the page originally linked to?! That's absurd! How is is supposed to help anything?
444:- which was related to the Honor Carrington series of books. This is likely to be a confusing name. In any case, this group of stubs would be covered by org-stub (organisations) or edu-stub (tertiary education).
507:
was "whenever you start to think you need a scorecard to keep track of the players" but that page never really got adopted. It's pretty rare that we need to untransclude. I'm not sure why the recent spate.
524:
There's a nasty bug in MediaWiki: if you edit a section, save it, get back an error and resubmit, there's a good chance the entire article from that section on will be duplicated. This is what happened at
1939:
Knowledge (XXG) (providing an encyclopedia) should outweigh the interest in maintaining a BJOADN page with links to disambiguation pages (which appear identical to the corrected links anyway). Cheers!
1330:
is protected (no history of vandalism on the page that I can see), but I need to do a blank save on it to get rid of a pesky disambig false positive from its template. Can you unprotect it? Cheers! --
558:
what you think of proposals for its demise? There are currently no substubs, since almost everything that was in the category was more likely to be expanded by giving it a more specific stub tempate.
2129:
2033:
1665:
has also been requested in the past, but not yet created. Certainly something along these lines should be straightforward enough to implement. I'm thinking of the following procedure:
1555:
Well I support the principle of creating a special page that does the same thing so when it comes to the vote let me know and I'll sign where my signature needs to be. –
1342:
Since there didn't appear to be any readily apparent reason why this image was being protected, I've unprotected and added it to my list of watched items, just in case. Best regards,
1881:
Yes, that was the idea. If something is perpetually backlogged because of influx, why not tag it? I'm trying to bring attention to the cat as much as possible, e.g. on RFA, as well.
1248:
1047:
The article is referring to the Celtic peoples who were eventually reduced to Wales and
Cornwall. "British" is the usual historical term you see for them for the period in question.
1429:
607:, the appropriate deletion procedure must be followed before content can be moved to the creator's userpage. Consider nominating this article for one of the following processes:
1953:
I thought something like that might be the case—no problem then. The article had a real spate of content edits before, so I like to keep an eye on it. –
1739:). Since certain factors are clearly red flags for articles, I'd like to find a way to mix in those factors to indicate which flags are the reddest, and worry about what to
712:
I see. Sorry if I seemed a bit snarky. I was having some trouble in the main article over this very link, and this appeared to be of a piece with it. Clearly it was not.
1458:
796:
26 database dump. The one you marked with the edit summary "no duplication apparent in this one" was duplicated, it had just been fixed in the meantime. –
943:
869:
Oh, thanks. I was trying to get it small enough to work on the
Community Portal, but I'm still having trouble fitting it into the layout. Ah, well. –
1126:. I think it's very wrong to add these links to other people's comments on talk pages and make it appear that were referring to the UK when they might not have been.
1921:
version of the article. I guess changing the links doesn't really matter, but the page kind of isn't supposed to be edited—did you mean to? –
98:
90:
94:
86:
1935:
1381:
657:
As a temporary work-around, you can copy your entire list of articles to a new user subpage, make all the article titles links, then click "related changes".
1931:
1385:
887:
481:
edit the transclusion link on the VfD day page from {{Knowledge (XXG):Votes for deletion/PAGENAME}} to {{Knowledge (XXG):Votes for deletion/PAGENAME/temp}}
504:
1485:
I think I've figured out how to archive it while saving the history. If you want me to, I'll be happy too, but I'd have to delete your archive (again). -
53:
49:
41:
931:
Should we do this now? I just think some users will jump right in with the collaboration, doing lots of work that will be done by your suggestion. --
611:
1530:
487:
Paste your header and explanation about the untransclusion on this /temp page. (If you ever need it, I keep a copy of that text on my user page.)
130:
2002:
Thanks for your help. I aim to finish off all the outstanding Conflict elements and revise the others for consistency during the next few days.
2128:
twice, and you deleted it from the list after dab'ing only one of them. Please check "Whatlinkshere" before you delete a template's entry from
1009:
Oh, quite alright. I'm glad to discover that there's already a reasonable list. Generating one from an offline database dump would require a
134:
792:. This is so that the information can be used to reduce false positives in the future. However, be aware that the list was generated from the
118:
110:
73:
65:
2060:(the dump master extraordinaire) has informed me that there are a total of 412194 main space article links needing repair (as of Nov. 13).--
1701:
But what's going to happen to these articles after they are found? Will there need to be a mechanism to suppress listing certain articles?
1307:
402:
114:
106:
77:
69:
61:
1760:
1327:
1082:
is running out of articles that the average user can address (mostly British Rail class articles remain). Can you generate a new list? --
1592:
User who doesn't really know anything about how a bot operates, but manages to use his by asking AllyUnion and RussBlau many questions:
82:
638:
I think we should encourage them to move it to their user page, but aside from that userfy/delete and delete/userfy is the same to me.
405:. As I said, in this case it's a good idea for a category, but if you are planning to make any more you should probably run them past
1662:
729:. Anyone who is curious can then examine the history of the page. But I agree, this is a clear copyright violation. –
623:
1079:
1068:
1917:
Hi, just wanted to ask if you were aware that the disambiguation links you fixed in Blue Coat School, Oldham were actually in the
503:
My personal rule of thumb is about 5 screens (7 on my work computer because the screen's narrower). The rule we tossed around at
1271:
Oh great guru, I climb the mountain to ask: would it be possible to generate a list of templates containing red links? Cheers! --
758:
Copy/paste to MS word, use blanket (and wildcarded) search/replace functions followed by paragraph sort, then paste back :)
597:
781:
138:
726:
589:
45:
37:
1676:
Uncompress the dump, and analyze it article-by-article, on the fly. This requires parsing XML to extract just four things:
617:
2048:
My pleasure. I'm sure it will be something to tell the grandkids... "You were an admin before BD2412, but I thought he was
1209:
Thanks for your prompt action - I'm not an admin, but I'm sure one will take care of this quickly, as we have many now. --
1194:
526:
1376:
I like delinking disambiguation pages and have delinked over 100 pages since you told me about the project. I worked on
1444:
I get the feeling that the Project is something of an unpopulated ghost town, but you could try posting a note there.--
1161:
The hard way - went screen by screen, 500 at a time, until I could go no further, then counted 141 remaining links. --
1137:
Thanks for the reply. I was just worried you were running some sort of bot and changing all of them without checking.
1123:
122:
1252:
725:
FYI, when you catch one of these, you need to also remove the text violation – which I have done at
448:
1187:
2069:
would be a server hog I imagine, but you can always hope. Have you ever considered using the disambiguation bot (
1991:
1898:
903:
883:
102:
57:
2114:), so I think you can still try to disambiguate on timelines, just preview and check it doesn't break anything.
1601:
1513:
It's odd, it went down shortly before my 30,000th edit too. I think she does it deliberately. –
681:
Actually started "British" at the beginning of the week but got a bit disillusioned! Taking another stab at it.
604:
1056:
441:
2053:
581:
1633:
I have this concept - need to work out details - but I'd like to be able to look at articles of greater than
394:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
2070:
1736:
902:, with a note at the top of the United States page that American redirects there, and directing readers to
843:
593:
1866:
1854:
2021:
585:
2111:
2091:
2010:
662:
532:
Or, of course, if you don't have all day, just resubmit and someone will come along and fix it. Cheers!
552:
477:'s VfD bot to fail to move the articles properly from VfD to VfD/Old. The preferred technique is to:
2074:
2061:
2037:
1658:
1605:
1593:
1462:
1445:
1437:
1409:
1364:
1177:
1154:
1033:
995:
932:
891:
1682:
The date (perhaps convert to number of days before the present) of the first or last edit (or both?)
2181:
2151:
1499:
1489:
1478:
1260:
966:
699:
where the wik was pointing to a page deliberately chosen to make the point, is highly questionable.
1918:
1153:
At the dab's with links page your mentionaed that you re-counted American, How did you do that? --
1885:
762:
745:
696:
890:. I think before the collaboration is chosen next time, we should fix up any redirects first. --
1377:
1013:
of disk space, and I don't have scripts handy to deal with non-current versions of articles. –
2057:
1865:
You are waisting a lot of effort. Someone is going to have to fix the damage you are doing to
1838:
1825:
1812:
1795:
1398:
1343:
1198:
1193:
I have put it up for speedy deletion. It is now empty and articles have been recategorised to
1029:
851:
825:
Ah, thanks for the disambiguation. I'm still getting accustomed to wikipedia's editing system.
512:
496:
2150:
My apologies for disturbing you again but I would value your opinion on the issues raised on
2017:
1945:
1749:
1719:
1648:
1618:
1563:
1539:
1521:
1422:
1336:
1298:
1277:
1218:
1202:
1170:
1141:
1130:
1091:
1004:
988:
952:
924:
910:, for an example. It would cut the job down to finding those relative few links that should
863:
814:
801:
430:
1800:
Edit: I see that they link to other language Wikipedias, but the links don't appear on the
406:
2136:
2118:
2099:
1801:
1776:
1709:
1556:
1514:
1361:
1041:
2174:
Sounds fine to me. We need more topic categories for unreferenced tags. –
2086:
Since I didn't get around to leaving a note on the project page (mea culpa), you dab'ed
576:
hi. i had a go at making a userfy template for the newbie vanity pages we keep getting.
2197:
2176:
1583:
1496:
1486:
1475:
1256:
1119:
1060:
1048:
970:
650:
Hi, I saw just your message about it taking days to check your list, due to the bug...
474:
1743:
with the information (i.e. setting up a triage system) once the info is on the table.
1661:, but that's only a list of the articles that have gone the longest without editing.
2110:
seems to work (I haven't found a problem with piped links on any other timeline than
1906:
1882:
1870:
1859:
1587:
1408:
OK, understood now! Thanks for the input and sorry about making your work harder...
1236:
915:
899:
838:
826:
759:
742:
713:
704:
653:
I haven't tried this yet myself, but here's something I just read from another user:
639:
632:
559:
537:
452:
410:
2056:
was protected. I lifted the protection and have done the link repair. Incidentally,
2163:
2155:
2003:
1996:
1831:
1818:
1805:
1788:
1391:
730:
509:
493:
1388:
section. So we aren't really anywhere near 80% done. Thanks for showing me this.
440:(Templates behave a bit oddly). The second is more serious - there was already a
2095:
this happens and what can be done to avoid it. Thanks and happy disambiguating,
1954:
1940:
1922:
1764:
1744:
1727:
1643:
1613:
1534:
1417:
1331:
1315:
1293:
1285:
1272:
1210:
1162:
1138:
1127:
1098:
1083:
1075:
1014:
999:
983:
947:
919:
870:
858:
809:
797:
682:
674:
424:
17:
2133:
2115:
2096:
946:. With about 5,000 links left to disambiguate, it would save a lot of work. --
2016:
This template I've created serves as a boilerplate text for the project page
1457:
I considered fixing Author as progress, do you mind? Thanks for creating the
1888:
765:
748:
548:
Hi - just wondering, since I see you are one of the few people still using
1693:
Dump these fields into a text file, which should take up less than 100 MB.
2125:
2087:
1978:
1970:
1233:
533:
1201:
page. If you are an administrator, please go ahead and delete the page.
1115:
1111:
886:? This would really change the Current Disambiguation Collaboration at
1059:
disambig page, it's the last ("ethnological") of the meanings given.
1028:
I never could really understand what the cowbell was about, but your
631:
do you think we should use it in future? make changes to it? thanks.
484:
Save the page then go back and find the link (which is now a redlink)
808:
Thanks for the tips, I'll check the histories henceforth. Cheers! --
564:
457:
415:
994:
Hi, sorry to have bothered you over this. Someone pointed out that
1850:
2073:)? I have managed to record speeds of over 600 an hour with it.--
998:
does something like this (although only in the article space). --
1698:
date. You could then post a list of the worst 500 to the wiki.
1670:
451:
to see what there is related to Uganda worth re-stubbing, too.
2130:
Knowledge (XXG):Disambiguation pages with links/from templates
2034:
Knowledge (XXG):Disambiguation pages with links/from templates
907:
2124:
And I have yet another nitpicking comment: That timeline had
1673:. This would require between 3 and 20 GB of free disk space.
1612:
Then I'm just going to have to learn to do bots myself, eh?
695:
Changing the wiki in talk pages, especically in the case of
614:
per criterion A7, if the article does not assert notability,
1249:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Centralized discussion/Lists of songs
1247:
I am writing because you contributed to the discussion at
1775:
What does this coding-found at the bottom of the article
1430:
Knowledge (XXG):Disambiguation pages with links/Challenge
1284:
Out of curiosity, why was it requested? –
898:
I was thinking that we would make "American" redirect to
1990:
I have modified one of the standard templates to create
1604:, I fear I couldn't process your question until 2010. --
1559:
1551:
Well I have now but am about to go to bed and you dump
1517:
427:
1328:
Image:Beatles-singles-the-long-and-winding-road-1.jpg
1628:
Vague idea of checking old articles with few edits.
833:
Thanks for your hard working disambiguation efforts
1384:section are almost as bad as the articles in the
1936:Knowledge (XXG):Disambiguation pages maintenance
784:ask that if there is no actual duplication, you
2132:(I have added a note at the top of that page).
1932:Knowledge (XXG):Disambiguation pages with links
1663:Knowledge (XXG):Pages edited by one author only
1461:, I was thinking about making that page soon.--
1582:Users who acutally know something about bots:
882:Are we going to make "American" a redirect to
505:Knowledge (XXG):Votes for deletion/Maintenance
965:Hi there, I've responded to your question on
8:
1314:of red links on templates. –
1671:http://download.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/
1657:Hmm...interesting idea. We currently have
1531:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Requests for adminship
1529:Have you noted the discussion I started on
673:Thanks so much, that was driving me crazy!
942:I think the issue should be raised on the
403:Knowledge (XXG): WikiProject Stub sorting
1308:Knowledge (XXG):Templates with red links
1255:and would welcome your comments. —
727:How Europeans came to dominate the world
580:This page may qualify for deletion as a
1761:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Neglected articles
1533:about coming up with a "back-up" tool?
1306:Your patience has been rewarded with
7:
2162:from my own stupidity (yet again).
1080:Knowledge (XXG):Most wanted articles
1069:Knowledge (XXG):Most wanted articles
878:Current Disambiguation Collaboration
1251:. I have made a policy proposal at
782:Knowledge (XXG):Duplicated sections
423:I've responded on your Talk page.--
1964:Pine nut / dabbing Native American
1474:should be that big of a problem. -
857:Nicely done with the shrinkage! --
24:
1977:Thanks; I'll change it to that -
1263:) 03:41, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
34:By topic (prior to June 1, 2009):
1562:
1520:
1110:Are you intending to change all
741:Refactored now, is this better?
563:
527:Knowledge (XXG):Unusual articles
456:
414:
2052:and admin"? I have no idea why
1279:13:06, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
1239:20:31, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
1205:05:36, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
1172:04:59, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
1157:04:55, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
1133:03:28, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
1122:? They are not synonymous. See
1040:Disambiguation of "British" in
605:proposed Knowledge (XXG) policy
596:, please discuss the matter on
146:Dated (beginning June 1, 2009):
2006:06:01, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
1999:07:02, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
1973:20:58, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
1909:17:18, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
1894:22:59, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
1873:02:17, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
1862:22:33, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
1767:06:17, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
1553:that much stuff to read on me?
1220:11:07, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
1197:as per your suggestion on the
1180:05:26, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
1144:09:36, September 8, 2005 (UTC)
1093:16:26, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
841:. Thank you. –
620:for uncontroversial deletions,
1:
2200:22:09, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
2191:Timeline of British composers
2166:14:00, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
2158:09:05, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
2121:22:27, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
2102:21:51, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
2064:09:42, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
2040:21:11, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
2024:18:17, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
1981:21:19, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
1950:12:56, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
1925:05:53, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
1797:13:45, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
1730:06:56, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
1608:05:33, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
1525:01:13, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
1492:03:28, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
1481:03:13, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
1465:05:40, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
1440:04:57, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
1412:09:44, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
1400:02:01, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
1253:User:Wahoofive/Lists of songs
1195:Category:Woodworking machines
1101:02:47, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
1036:16:55, August 27, 2005 (UTC)
1006:17:45, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
990:14:52, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
973:21:04, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
894:07:02, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
865:02:39, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
847:14:35, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
449:Category:Africa-related stubs
447:You might like to go through
25:
2139:22:49, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
2077:14:35, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
2071:meta:Solve_disambiguation.py
1957:17:30, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
1840:14:15, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
1754:15:28, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
1669:Download a *full* dump from
1653:04:04, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
1623:13:38, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
1602:Knowledge (XXG):Bot requests
1567:01:18, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
1544:01:15, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
1502:03:30, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
1448:05:11, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
1424:15:56, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
1416:No problem - happy editing!
1367:15:32, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
1338:15:21, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
1318:03:04, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
1288:08:14, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
1188:Category:Woodworking machine
1051:03:04, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
1032:- pure genius. Thank you. --
954:07:25, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
935:07:21, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
926:07:11, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
829:13:37, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
754:14:14, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
626:where consensus is required.
2081:
1899:Talk:Kirby (disambiguation)
1346:17:15, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
1300:12:25, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
1124:British Isles (terminology)
1063:03:05, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
1017:04:15, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
873:18:33, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
816:14:59, August 7, 2005 (UTC)
804:05:52, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
771:15:44, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
2218:
1737:Knowledge (XXG):Shortpages
1452:
1232:No problem, glad to help.
733:17:22, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
690:Disambiguation link repair
592:. If you feel the page is
1992:Template:Conflict of laws
1310:. Turns out there are a
904:American (disambiguation)
884:American (disambiguation)
716:01:54, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
707:01:41, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
642:14:24, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
635:05:58, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
588:mistakenly created as an
499:02:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
419:03:08, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
2054:Template:Houston Infobox
2044:Template:Houston Infobox
2028:new dab template project
1913:Blue Coat School, Oldham
1679:The title of the article
1351:Your welcome template...
1267:Templates with red links
677:8 July 2005 16:36 (UTC)
665:1 July 2005 19:15 (UTC)
646:Temporary Bug workaround
568:05:34, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
540:16:58, 2005 May 2 (UTC)
515:02:22, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
461:03:37, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
442:Template:Honorverse-stub
432:03:29, 2005 Apr 14 (UTC)
1849:Your changes regarding
1830:Thanks for your help --
1802:Abraham Lincoln article
1380:. The articles in the
837:You caught my folly on
685:8 July 2005 19:06 (UTC)
395:Template:Lawschool-stub
1867:Grass (disambiguation)
1855:Grass (disambiguation)
1804:Why is this? Thanks.--
2112:Template:Roman Empire
2092:Template:Roman Empire
1688:The number of editors
1149:What links here count
788:the line rather than
624:Articles for Deletion
2146:My apologies (again)
1763:.) –
1659:Special:Ancientpages
1637:age with fewer than
1600:Try Ally or Russ or
1508:
1322:Unprotection request
996:Special:Ancientpages
906:for other uses. See
780:The instructions on
2152:Talk:Get (conflict)
1685:The number of edits
1495:Okay, no problem. -
468:VfD untransclusions
2011:Template:FAOL text
977:Long-dormant files
776:Duplicate sections
697:Talk:Holy Saturday
2205:
2204:
2187:
2186:• 2005-12-6 15:27
2082:Dab'ing timelines
1995:to disturb you.
1574:Special bot query
1326:I can't tell why
1199:User talk:SilentC
1030:Template:MiniAWFP
944:project talk page
852:Template:MiniAWFP
821:RE:disambiguation
618:Proposed Deletion
2209:
2184:
2175:
1943:
1892:
1836:
1823:
1810:
1793:
1779:- mean? Thanks,
1747:
1724:
1718:
1714:
1708:
1646:
1616:
1566:
1537:
1524:
1453:Dab's with links
1420:
1396:
1334:
1296:
1275:
1216:
1168:
1089:
1002:
986:
961:Dormant articles
950:
922:
888:Dab's with links
861:
846:
844:Ambush Commander
812:
769:
752:
663:Codex Sinaiticus
567:
557:
551:
460:
418:
26:
2217:
2216:
2212:
2211:
2210:
2208:
2207:
2206:
2193:
2182:
2172:
2148:
2084:
2075:Commander Keane
2062:Commander Keane
2046:
2038:Commander Keane
2030:
2014:
1988:
1966:
1941:
1915:
1902:
1890:
1879:
1847:
1832:
1819:
1806:
1789:
1787:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1777:Abraham Lincoln
1773:
1758:
1745:
1722:
1716:
1712:
1706:
1644:
1630:
1614:
1606:Commander Keane
1594:Commander Keane
1576:
1535:
1511:
1471:
1463:Commander Keane
1455:
1446:Commander Keane
1438:Commander Keane
1433:
1418:
1406:
1392:
1374:
1353:
1332:
1324:
1294:
1273:
1269:
1245:
1230:
1224:
1211:
1191:
1178:Commander Keane
1163:
1155:Commander Keane
1151:
1108:
1084:
1072:
1045:
1042:Penda of Mercia
1034:Commander Keane
1026:
1000:
984:
979:
963:
948:
933:Commander Keane
920:
892:Commander Keane
880:
859:
855:
842:
835:
823:
810:
790:striking it out
778:
767:
750:
739:
723:
692:
671:
648:
629:
612:Speedy Deletion
574:
572:Userfy template
555:
549:
546:
522:
470:
398:
390:
143:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2215:
2213:
2203:
2202:
2192:
2189:
2171:
2168:
2147:
2144:
2143:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2083:
2080:
2079:
2078:
2045:
2042:
2029:
2026:
2013:
2008:
1987:
1984:
1983:
1982:
1965:
1962:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1958:
1914:
1911:
1901:
1896:
1878:
1875:
1846:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1772:
1769:
1759:(Continued on
1756:
1755:
1695:
1694:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1686:
1683:
1680:
1674:
1655:
1654:
1629:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1598:
1597:
1590:
1575:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1546:
1545:
1510:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1470:
1467:
1454:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1432:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1405:
1402:
1373:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1352:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1323:
1320:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1268:
1265:
1244:
1243:Lists of songs
1241:
1229:
1226:
1222:
1221:
1190:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1150:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1120:United Kingdom
1107:
1106:Disambiguation
1104:
1103:
1102:
1071:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1044:
1038:
1025:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
978:
975:
962:
959:
958:
957:
956:
955:
937:
936:
928:
927:
879:
876:
875:
874:
854:
849:
834:
831:
822:
819:
818:
817:
777:
774:
773:
772:
738:
735:
722:
721:About Copyvios
719:
718:
717:
709:
708:
700:
691:
688:
687:
686:
670:
667:
647:
644:
628:
627:
621:
615:
584:, or may be a
578:
573:
570:
545:
542:
521:
518:
517:
516:
489:
488:
485:
482:
475:user:AllyUnion
469:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
445:
434:
433:
397:
392:
388:
387:
330:
269:
208:
147:
142:
141:
80:
35:
32:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2214:
2201:
2199:
2190:
2188:
2185:
2180:
2179:
2169:
2167:
2165:
2159:
2157:
2153:
2145:
2138:
2135:
2131:
2127:
2123:
2122:
2120:
2117:
2113:
2109:
2105:
2104:
2103:
2101:
2098:
2093:
2089:
2076:
2072:
2067:
2066:
2065:
2063:
2059:
2055:
2051:
2043:
2041:
2039:
2035:
2027:
2025:
2023:
2019:
2012:
2009:
2007:
2005:
2000:
1998:
1993:
1985:
1980:
1976:
1975:
1974:
1972:
1963:
1956:
1952:
1951:
1949:
1948:
1944:
1937:
1933:
1928:
1927:
1926:
1924:
1920:
1912:
1910:
1908:
1900:
1897:
1895:
1893:
1887:
1884:
1876:
1874:
1872:
1868:
1863:
1861:
1856:
1852:
1844:
1839:
1837:
1835:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1824:
1822:
1814:
1813:
1811:
1809:
1803:
1798:
1796:
1794:
1792:
1785:
1778:
1770:
1768:
1766:
1762:
1753:
1752:
1748:
1742:
1738:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1729:
1721:
1711:
1702:
1699:
1692:
1687:
1684:
1681:
1678:
1677:
1675:
1672:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1664:
1660:
1652:
1651:
1647:
1640:
1636:
1632:
1631:
1627:
1622:
1621:
1617:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1607:
1603:
1595:
1591:
1589:
1585:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1573:
1565:
1561:
1558:
1554:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1543:
1542:
1538:
1532:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1523:
1519:
1516:
1501:
1498:
1494:
1493:
1491:
1488:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1480:
1477:
1468:
1466:
1464:
1460:
1447:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1439:
1431:
1428:
1423:
1421:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1411:
1403:
1401:
1399:
1397:
1395:
1389:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1371:
1366:
1363:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1350:
1345:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1337:
1335:
1329:
1321:
1319:
1317:
1313:
1309:
1299:
1297:
1290:
1289:
1287:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1278:
1276:
1266:
1264:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1242:
1240:
1238:
1235:
1227:
1225:
1219:
1217:
1215:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1189:
1186:
1179:
1174:
1173:
1171:
1169:
1167:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1156:
1148:
1143:
1140:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1132:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1105:
1100:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1092:
1090:
1088:
1081:
1077:
1070:
1067:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1050:
1043:
1039:
1037:
1035:
1031:
1024:Mini template
1023:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1007:
1005:
1003:
997:
993:
992:
991:
989:
987:
976:
974:
972:
968:
960:
953:
951:
945:
941:
940:
939:
938:
934:
930:
929:
925:
923:
917:
916:United States
913:
909:
905:
901:
900:United States
897:
896:
895:
893:
889:
885:
877:
872:
868:
867:
866:
864:
862:
853:
850:
848:
845:
840:
839:Prescott Farm
832:
830:
828:
820:
815:
813:
807:
806:
805:
803:
799:
795:
791:
787:
783:
775:
770:
764:
761:
757:
756:
755:
753:
747:
744:
736:
734:
732:
728:
720:
715:
711:
710:
706:
701:
698:
694:
693:
689:
684:
680:
679:
678:
676:
668:
666:
664:
659:
658:
654:
651:
645:
643:
641:
636:
634:
625:
622:
619:
616:
613:
610:
609:
608:
606:
601:
599:
598:its talk page
595:
591:
587:
583:
577:
571:
569:
566:
561:
554:
543:
541:
539:
535:
530:
528:
519:
514:
511:
506:
502:
501:
500:
498:
495:
486:
483:
480:
479:
478:
476:
467:
459:
454:
450:
446:
443:
438:
437:
436:
435:
431:
429:
426:
422:
421:
420:
417:
412:
408:
404:
396:
393:
391:
386:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
331:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
270:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
209:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
148:
145:
144:
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
81:
79:
75:
71:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
43:
39:
36:
33:
30:
29:
28:
27:
19:
2194:
2177:
2173:
2170:Unreferenced
2160:
2149:
2107:
2085:
2049:
2047:
2031:
2015:
2001:
1989:
1967:
1946:
1916:
1903:
1880:
1864:
1848:
1833:
1820:
1815:
1807:
1799:
1790:
1786:
1774:
1757:
1750:
1740:
1723:}}
1717:{{
1713:}}
1707:{{
1703:
1700:
1696:
1656:
1649:
1638:
1634:
1619:
1599:
1577:
1552:
1540:
1512:
1472:
1456:
1434:
1419: BD2412
1407:
1404:Your message
1393:
1390:
1375:
1354:
1344:Hall Monitor
1333: BD2412
1325:
1311:
1305:
1295: BD2412
1274: BD2412
1270:
1246:
1231:
1223:
1213:
1192:
1176:4606 now. --
1165:
1152:
1109:
1086:
1073:
1046:
1027:
1010:
1001: BD2412
985: BD2412
980:
967:my talk page
964:
949: BD2412
921: BD2412
911:
881:
860: BD2412
856:
836:
824:
811: BD2412
793:
789:
785:
779:
740:
724:
672:
660:
656:
655:
652:
649:
637:
630:
602:
579:
575:
556:}}
550:{{
547:
531:
523:
490:
471:
399:
389:
126:
1509:Kate's Tool
1382:maintenance
1203:Luigizanasi
582:vanity page
18:User:BD2412
1497:Greg Asche
1487:Greg Asche
1476:Greg Asche
1469:Page move.
1386:main links
1362:Journalist
520:Safety tip
2198:bodnotbod
1891:>|<
1584:AllyUnion
1378:Egyptions
1257:Wahoofive
1061:Everyking
1049:Everyking
971:Enchanter
914:point to
786:underline
768:>|<
751:>|<
586:user page
139:Vandalism
2126:Pantheon
2088:Pantheon
1986:Conflict
1907:R. fiend
1877:Backlog?
1871:Marshman
1860:Marshman
1771:Question
1588:RussBlau
827:Trilemma
737:Quizbowl
714:Csernica
705:Csernica
661:Cheers,
640:Nateji77
633:Nateji77
560:Grutness
544:Substubs
492:night.
453:Grutness
411:Grutness
46:Deletion
38:Articles
31:Archives
2164:David91
2156:David91
2108:usually
2018:WP:FAOL
2004:David91
1997:David91
1834:Prodego
1821:Prodego
1808:Prodego
1791:Prodego
1720:cleanup
1578:Mmm...
1410:Charlie
1394:Prodego
1116:British
1112:Britain
1074:Hello,
1057:British
1055:At the
802:✎
731:llywrch
594:notable
590:article
553:substub
510:Rossami
494:Rossami
409:first!
2137:(talk)
2119:(talk)
2100:(talk)
2050:always
2032:About
1955:SCZenz
1942:BD2412
1923:SCZenz
1919:BJAODN
1886:adiant
1765:Beland
1746:BD2412
1728:Beland
1710:wikify
1645:BD2412
1615:BD2412
1557:Francs
1536:BD2412
1515:Francs
1500:(talk)
1490:(talk)
1479:(talk)
1372:Thanks
1316:Beland
1286:Beland
1237:(talk)
1214:BD2412
1212:
1166:BD2412
1164:
1139:Angela
1128:Angela
1099:Beland
1087:BD2412
1085:
1076:Beland
1015:Beland
871:Beland
798:Cyrius
763:adiant
746:adiant
513:(talk)
497:(talk)
428:BD2412
407:WP:WSS
2178:BRIAN
2134:Kusma
2116:Kusma
2097:Kusma
2090:from
1851:Grass
1845:Grass
1459:Guide
669:Queen
123:Tools
83:Misc.
16:<
2183:0918
1934:and
1853:and
1715:and
1560:2000
1518:2000
1365:talk
1261:talk
1234:Noel
918:. --
794:June
683:Mark
675:Mark
603:Per
538:Talk
2106:It
1979:MPF
1971:MPF
1312:lot
1228:RfD
1118:to
1114:or
1011:lot
912:not
908:NBA
534:JRM
425:8^D
385:059
381:058
377:057
373:056
369:055
365:054
361:053
357:052
353:051
349:050
345:049
341:048
337:047
333:046
328:045
324:044
320:043
316:042
312:041
308:040
304:039
300:038
296:037
292:036
288:035
284:034
280:033
276:032
272:031
267:030
263:029
259:028
255:027
251:026
247:025
243:024
239:023
235:022
231:021
227:020
223:019
219:018
215:017
211:016
206:015
202:014
198:013
194:012
190:011
186:010
182:009
178:008
174:007
170:006
166:005
162:004
158:003
154:002
150:001
135:3rd
131:2nd
127:1st
119:4th
107:1st
103:RfA
99:4th
87:1st
78:5th
74:4th
62:1st
58:Law
50:1st
42:1st
2196:--
2154:.
2058:Bo
2022:CG
2020:.
1741:do
1586:,
1436:--
1292:--
1078:!
969:.
600:.
562:|
536:·
455:|
413:|
115:3d
111:2d
95:3d
91:2d
70:3d
66:2d
54:2d
1947:T
1905:-
1889:_
1883:R
1751:T
1650:T
1639:y
1635:x
1620:T
1596:.
1541:T
1259:(
1142:.
1131:.
800:|
766:_
760:R
749:_
743:R
383:-
379:-
375:-
371:-
367:-
363:-
359:-
355:-
351:-
347:-
343:-
339:-
335:-
326:-
322:-
318:-
314:-
310:-
306:-
302:-
298:-
294:-
290:-
286:-
282:-
278:-
274:-
265:-
261:-
257:-
253:-
249:-
245:-
241:-
237:-
233:-
229:-
225:-
221:-
217:-
213:-
204:-
200:-
196:-
192:-
188:-
184:-
180:-
176:-
172:-
168:-
164:-
160:-
156:-
152:-
137:/
133:-
129:-
125:-
121:/
117:-
113:-
109:-
105:-
101:/
97:-
93:-
89:-
85:-
76:-
72:-
68:-
64:-
60:-
56:/
52:-
48:-
44:/
40:-
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.