Knowledge (XXG)

User:BD2412/Archive - Tools (second 50)

Source πŸ“

2457:. This seems preferable, as both VP:Technical and VP:policy are certainly apropo venues for a link posting, and I think we've all seen some of the bad effects of the current trend. This point made by the originator is sparse, but on point and imho, important. By keeping the discussion there, it can be similarly referenced on other BB's (Meta for one), and there are a few others. I'm much too focused on wikiEditing to keep up with all the discussion forums, so where should it go, should it be given a seperate venue (Yet another 'proposed guideline'!), or what? In sum, seems to me the 'Internal links' section with such a category template would solve both problems with minimal edit dislocation. 1947:"If a viewpoint is in the majority, then it should be easy to substantiate it with reference to commonly accepted reference texts; If a viewpoint is held by a significant minority, then it should be easy to name prominent adherents; If a viewpoint is held by an extremely small (or vastly limited) minority, it doesn't belong in Knowledge (XXG) (except perhaps in some ancillary article) regardless of whether it's true or not; and regardless of whether you can prove it or not." 2755:. Intriguingly, if our wikiPcategory is newly created, it shows both things added here, and mirrored down from the commons for a long while (Perhaps, due to the SAME (I hypothesize) once a day Dbase update perhaps? I'd have to experiment to duplicate the phenom, but I've seen it twice at least, so much so, I thought it was the 'norm' until looking around this morning.) 668: 1346:. B) doesn't change the perceived or intended message of the comment. C) reduces the total number of ambiguous/errant links to ] (intentionally not linked to btw), reducing the clutter at "Whatlinkshere" and to make mistaken links in articles easier to spot and correct. Your thoughts on this would be welcome. — 2638:
myself cnt BD2412 => edit count for BD2412 wiki Truman => google search for site:en.wikipedia.org truman wikio delete => google search for site:en.wikipedia.org inurl:wiki/Wikipedia delete (searches for stuff in the wikipedia: namespace) ...
2808:
solution. This needs an straight forward database exchange, which should be run as part of a daily system maintenance package as the surest solution. It might be implimented as a script, but it should be managed and monitored occasionally by the IT types—the so called system operators (at least
1131:
I am not sure what you meant by the comment dropped on my talk page. If you say that I am not following MoS:DP closely, then please provide details, and I will explain or correct. If you are saying that my following MoS:DP harms Knowledge (XXG), then please take your ideas to that manual's talk page,
975:
Links from user pages are of minimal concern. The first concern is that users reading an article or an image or category description will not be taken to the wrong place when they click a link. User pages should only be bothered with if there is a clear intent to point to a particular article instead
2405:
are proper legal citation, but it takes a moment for those of us unfamiliar with Roman numerals to realize the last section is referencing nothing less than Amend. 14! Any thoughts? Can I at least start writing "Fourteenth Amendment in these boxes as I do case pages? Also, do you know of any current
1295:
I have working through these to help out, but I use several computers and keep my place by the blocks and numbering. Is there any reason to re-organize them back into blocks of 100 beside that it looks nicer? I think everyone understands that it was put into blocks of 100 at the database dump and
1140:
I understand wanting to surf, (they can use the "random article" link, as I often do), but there are some horribly cluttered disambig pages out there. It leads to the problem of having information in the disambig page that is not in the article, or not scrutinized and updated when better sources are
2452:
issue of the default skin hiding categories from the user for around two months, and this related thing punched the button pretty much dead center as the same point has been nagging at me as is made by the originator. Seems to me a VP listing ought be made on both, as it were, by at least a mention
1939:
however, as long as you want to take a position on the mediation page, the issue is not whether to call the sea "sea of japan" or "east sea," (the participants already agree that it is properly called the "sea of japan"), but the current primary english use of "east sea." the applicable rule is not
1585:
had weighed in on it. I do not think the concern about possible changes to the template is valid, as we probably want an "unsigned" notice to stay the same after it is posted, and not change if the template is changed; however, if the server load problem is not a problem, I'll put my time to better
2637:
w Bush => goes to the Bush article w {{cent}} => Template:Cent con => Special:Contributions/$ myself con BD2412 => Special:Contributions/BD2414 cnt => edit count for
1950:
here, it is easy to substantiate the majority view with reference to commonly accepted reference texts. the references below the most current, most prominent english dictionaries and encyclopedias, and while i do not object to having a dab page with non-primary uses, no commonly accepted reference
1554:
Is that the only reason? Subst'ing templates like that clutters up the wikitext and makes it a lot more difficult to read, especially for the less-technically-inclined. It also removes the updatability of templates, which is important for things with complex HTML that might need to be tweaked to
467:
I forgot what the hell I made that for --presumably it was in the midst of my math and physics binge editing, where I often found that specialized articles (matrices in this case) would benefit from some cohesive context. I don't object to anything you might want to do with it and if i have time I
1434:
Starting your edit summary with a link promoting some software makes it slower for me to scan my watchlist. It's also frustrating because I can't even run Windows software on my computer, so it feels a bit like you are spamming my watchlist (no offence intended). Would you mind setting your AWB
3197:
In a discussion above on this page, you said: "the disambig page should be at 'Foo' and 'Foo (disambiguation)' should redirect there." Can you explain to me what the point is of having "Foo (disambiguation)" at all? Are there cases where that page is inappropriate or simply not needed? I've been
1709:
After I click on the userfied link, what next. Where do I get the contents of the original page from ? From the history ? Also whats the point in userfying a page that is supposed to be in the article namespace ? How will someone get to know that the deleted page is now userifed?
2758:
In any event, I'm looking for a contact(s) from you that is a programmer(s) who's brain I can pick on these varying behaviors, as well as asking about the feasibility to auto-move these things inbetween dbases. You, with acounts on both as well, are certainly aware that internationally the two
1912:
we just don't need any more diversions in the already messy mediation, so it would help if you either undid the merger, with the assurance that the mediation will resolve the problem one way or the other, or clearly explain that your action was completely unrelated to the issue being mediated,
1739:
Yes, all the previous revisions are in the history. I didn't revert when I moved it to your userspace just because I figure that the state of user subpage is for the user to decide themselves. The article was deleted from the article namespace, and the deletion review was happy enough with the
1141:
found. Minimalism helps to quickly guide a reader to the full article, and is not meant to amuse them along the way (except for ship disambig pages, and I have learned to avoid those). Please bring up your ideas on the talk page of MoS:DP, which I watch, and where others can also discuss them.
543:
Hi, I've had a look at this and it's not entirely clear to me what changes to make. The actual source of most articles runs to under 3K chars and there aren't many redundant spaces (the end-result as reported by wiki is a lot larger though). What replacement(s) did you make when editing?
2738:
at this exchange. This situation is very inefficient, and prone to severe time lags (thumbs don't mirror here immediately, for example, and sometimes don't mirror here at all for reasons I've yet to determine: Compare by following interwiki links (focus on images present, not text):
2616:
Ack, people use the javascript counter? I was hoping it would go away at some point, the toolserver version is more fun to work on, it's not missing lots of features. Well, the toolserver data is more recent/noncorrupt now, so people could potentially use the toolserver
2282:
Links should use the most precise target that arises in the context, even where that is merely a simple redirect to a less specific page title. Don't use a piped link to avoid otherwise legitimate redirect targets that fit well within the scope of the text. ...
3041:
talk page. In the absence of consensus, another user and I feel that things should be put back to the status quo the way they were as you put them back in March. However, I am unsure as to how to go about doing this. Would you mind lending a hand? Thanks.
3095:
which sometimes decides to userfy things. The userfy page is nicely written but contains nothing that isn't also listed elsewhere; it would be preferable to merge it somewhere because the more pages we have in Wikispace, the more confusing it gets. HTH!
513:
Thanks for that - probably no point in fixing them by hand. I've been looking for feedback (without a lot of success) prior to rerunning the bot. Most editing seems to relate to disambiguation. I can rerun the bot next weekend to do a cleanup.
1230:
and wait an hour or so, and they all get moved with a bot. Since you are an admin, the bot will work. Be carefull to spell it exacty as I have. For some strange quirky reason, it doesn't work with the correct name of the template. --
2331:
Well, being a fool for consistency, I suppose it's better to finish.... "Don't fix links to redirects" was only finalized in January after a couple of months of discussion, but Redirects with possibilities has been around a long time!
2620:
Even more offtopic: I don't use popups because they seem to make Firefox on my computer leak memory faster than usual. I use a Firefox extension that I should release sometime, that provides a slightly more enhanced version of
2935:
if the title "Transcendental" is not already assigned to an article with one of the specific meanings, correct? In other words, the disambiguation page does not need "(disambiguation)" in its title in all cases, right? —
1262:
Yes, it is much more relaxing than trying to calm a revert war. You can make a ritual out of the entire rename process which is also relaxing. Rick Block outlined the entire process on my talk page if you are interested. --
2063:
Sure, sounds like a Category worth joining. There's so much so-so legal info on wikipedia that it would take an army of us to fix it up... maybe we can eventually put companies like Emannuel out of business, eh? ----
2538:
of things. User functions drop down, AfD auto closer, Status changer, pop-ups, auto warn, AfD auto vote, tabs to assist in selective deletions, Interiot's backup edit counter, ect. Note you will need to change the
1314:
I do it to keep track of the total number finished, in order to update progress on the front page. But I can just as well leave it sit for a while, so I shall do that. Glad to see you're working through it, btw!
582:
reads like a talk page archive, but it's in the main archive namespace. Can you move it to the appropriate non-article namespace, as a) it really shouldn't be in the article namespace, and b) it's appearing on
747:
and fix it? Its been moved around, had its prime def(the name) removed... I am not sure about these changes, I reverted them once, but when they came back, I decided to ask you to take a look. Thanks,
2782:
I'm afraid you've gone beyond my area of expertise (or, really, even competence) my friend - I can graba few images and download/re-upload them, but I'm no scriptwriter! I'm sure it can be done, tho.
626: 916:
Doesn't qualify for any kind of deletion, so far as I can tell - user subpages generally get lenient treatment, unless the user is trying to post an advert or an attack or the like. If so, they go to
1870:
thanks for doing the thankless cleanup. i understand you're doing what needs to be done for the vast majority of cases, but the east sea situation was in a temporarily awkward state for a reason.
1296:
they will be removed as they are fixed leaving less than 100. If there is another reason to do this I will understand, but otherwise could we keep the orinal block even when they drop under 100.--
2813:
to the sister) for a month or so, then purge such when the interval is completed. Shell scripts can't do that. A system software program with a log file (dbase) can... almost trivially. //
390:
This archive contains discussions related to Wikitools (templates, categories, disambigs, etc.) and Wikiprojects (Disambiguation repair, Red link repair, Duplicated section repair, etc.) --
2944:
Correct. A page should not be titled "Foo (disambiguation)" if "Foo" is available; instead, the disambig page should be at "Foo" and "Foo (disambiguation)" should redirect there. Cheers!
854: 2223: 2024:
By the way, like my new userpage? I designed it myself :-) No more stolen(from CoolCat) design. I still have to do the talk page, although I'm not sure how I'll do that yet....
2678:... but I was just saying Hi there when helping out on map reorganization, et al. I thought I was on wiki-break. Hah! Thank God for friends and email! Lend some vote help please! 2423: 3124:
It is useful to have a single page that ties all of these policies together as they relate to the singular activity of transplanting material from the main spaces to user space.
2682: 1067:
urg. no. look at the formatting. the section titles at the very least completely disregard the MoS. I'm done with the dabbings, so I'm gonna go futz with it for a while...
660:
Hey, I was wondering if you could lend your law expertise to that template above. A slew of editors are trying to revert an rfc under the guise of outside of WP legal concerns.
2522:(unless you use some other skin). There are so many extra features you can have if you customize it. You don't even use pop-ups? If you use FireFox, you can use my files ( 2407: 1202: 772:(the main editor) were beneficial, but many(he seems to have gone on an overly bureaucratic rampage ;-) were detrimental. If you could review my changes, thanks. 2688:
This guy (nominating) you know, so see if you can calm him down. I sent a peace offering via email, but this is just petty bull and sucking up free time! Thanks. //
1928:. please, help us resolve the mediation fairly by not commenting on the disputed issue, or basing your comments on references, not personal knowledge. thanks again. 98: 90: 2353:
here. You might not remember me, but I recall you saying I should let you know if I need help with another disambiguation effort. Well, I kinda do. Ever heard of
94: 86: 2401:
BD, these Supreme Court case boxes seem exceedingly user unfriendly. For example, the citations, prior history, subsequent history, and laws applied sections of
2475:. Personally, I rarely visit the nether regions of a web-page, and admittedly tend to attribute that to other 'oldsters' as well. I guess the key question is: 1154: 2707:- certainly I've never seen that, and I think you could just as easily list your user pages somewhere on a subpage... I'll have to think on the others a bit. 2422:
Yet another suggestion has been made to replace the standard case infobox with an uglier and inferior one. I'd appreciate it if you could drop a comment at
2890: 2603:
are very helpful however, definitely use those. Also, Interiot's backup edit counter is pretty much universal, it is even used in the edit counts for RfAs.
1393: 2361:" and began a new campaign. Thing, I had no idea just how many articles link to it. I'm kinda...in over my head. Ahem. ..Would you be willing to help out? 1604:
Well, it's been changed 37 times since it was first created. I don't think it too outlandish that it might want to be changed in the future, too. :-)
1467:
you removed Template:Unsigned and replaced it with the long form. I was wondering why this is being done; in other words I'm a little confused. Thanks. –
53: 2904:
Hey! I just left my opinion on the talk page. Sorry for not getting back, I was (and still am) on break. I should be back to editing soon. Until then,
486:
Thanks for your message in respect of above, and your interest in the subject. I shall shortly do the necessary re-writes/ edits. These tribes refer to
1220:
I'm wondering if you are aware that you don't need to manually recatagorize all the articles when a category gets renamed a CfD. You just have to add
2288:
Automated processes should not replace or pipe links to redirects. Instead, the link should always be examined in context. (For more information, see
49: 41: 2297: 1924:
thanks for the clarification, but i don't know if your last comment based on your personal knowledge helped the process, considering these citations
1206: 893: 831:). It will do as it is, I think - if it was an article on the name, we'd still be fixing bad links all the time, as folks will still be misdirecting 3206:
Sometimes folks look for or link to "Foo (disambiguation)" first, or try to create such a page unaware that a disambig page already exists. Cheers!
689:
Hi Beland, could you do me a quick favor and null edit every article, image, template, and category in Knowledge (XXG). Cheers, and happy holidays!
2454: 2270:
I've just noticed some (or many) bypassing of redirects using AWB. Were you aware that after discussion in several places that the consensus was
2081:
You know the community is probably going to delete this cat (or at least take out all the articles that are not actual Seagal films or the like).
2896:
I will give you a real reply when I think this through a bit more. I am intrigued by the clean-up aspect for sure. Regards and will be in touch.
1195: 889: 2370: 134: 126: 2763:
categories. IFT, if the two are equalized, everyone's work drops and productivy where-ever increases as the 'familiarity' is present between
118: 110: 73: 65: 2464:
is present under current standards (editorial guidelines), but my crystal ball shattered some years back <g>, so I can't measure it's
1989:
in cases of a clear primary use, wikipedia practice is to redirect to the primary use, and hatnote to a disambiguation page for other uses.
1413: 584: 114: 106: 77: 69: 61: 2752: 2275: 2432:
made me aware that there is no article on the right to redeem foreclosed property prior to or immediately after seizure and resale. The
1102:
Yeah. The article's a mess. I'm fixing it slowly but surely, between doing other things here... I should be done by tomorrow :-p
82: 2577:
Well I may look into it, but I have no complaints about what I've got at the moment - a different monoook won't write articles for me!
1607:
Are those changes important enough to propagate to each time it is used? Maybe, maybe not... With substitution, we have no choice. β€”
1528:
It is my understanding that the inclusion of a template on a page puts a tiny extra bit of strain on the Knowledge (XXG) servers (see
1475:
It is my understanding that the inclusion of a template on a page puts a tiny extra bit of strain on the Knowledge (XXG) servers (see
1435:
software so that it doesn't add the promotional link to the edit summary, or at least so it puts it at the end, like "... using AWB"?
1283:. Perhaps in the blessed days of 2004, AfD's were decided on single votes. Can you provide evidence for what you say? Were you there? 1439: 449:
That was my reaction when I saw one of your edits to the page, "Holy crap, BD2412's really moving on this one, I better help out".
1680:
Well thanks for starting the policy page for that. I had made it a redirect since I couldn't find anything on the topic except in
2685:
This is a bit of spiteful non-sense— at least on the admin cats, imho. Don't know I've ever seen a policy on a user cat.
1532:) - generally not much to complain of, but this particular template is used on over 6,000 pages, so that load seems unnecessary. 1479:) - generally not much to complain of, but this particular template is used on over 6,000 pages, so that load seems unnecessary. 814:, although I still perfer a full article on the name if anyone wants to write it, however, if not your solution works admirably. 1696:
The reason for that particular userfication was made clear during the deletion review debate, and I gave a link at that time to
2931: 1936:
there is no doubt that you came to this issue with good faith intent to do some necessary clean-up unrelated to the mediation.
494: 138: 2804:
I was figuring that you would know of or personally interact with a 'Programmer' you could recommend. Scripts seem like the
1464: 45: 37: 2531: 1182: 1166: 1697: 3038: 3022: 2044: 896:, as it is not English? Why is a non-english not a category for speedy deletion, but poorly translated is? This is on a 642:
Thanks so much. I actually counted 3 instead of 5, since 2 people had stated a precondition that was fulfilled. —
2764: 676:
Thank you, my pet bear also wanted to show his gratitude for you astounding legal advice there. Keep up the good work!
122: 2477:
If one is reading casually, what reason have they, 'our customer-readers' for looking lower down past the references?
2289: 2123:
There's an argument for that - more likely they'll strip it from most of the articles (I see someone removed it from
1786:
Hmmmm... well, to the extent that one can claim ownership of an account, the accounts do "belong to" administrators.
1084:
Oh, I thought you just meant the disambig. Wasn't there some question about whether this guy was even really Jewish?
1570:. I'd say the systemic bias cost of substituting these templates is significantly worse than anything it solves. β€” 406:
Based on your disambiguation relinks, this is just the kind of mindless repetitive task you'll love doing! ;-)
2971:
For some reason I can't get this template to work the way it is supposed to. Any suggestions as to what to do? --
2366: 2337: 2306: 2101: 1655:
That bot has now stopped subst'ing unsigned until we reach a consensus as to if it should be done or not. I think
2744: 2704: 2527: 1886: 1864: 1224: 1173:
Sorry, I assumed that, it being there and people having "subscribed to it", meant that it was active. Pardon me--
592: 102: 57: 1961: 1849: 1685: 3225: 2523: 2113: 1520:? I've moved it to the "disputed" section, because subst'ing it just causes unnecessary clutter in my eyes. β€” 1342:
was recently described as "dodgy". I disagree, in that it: A) avoids an ambigous/errantly redirecting link to
579: 965: 384: 380: 376: 372: 368: 364: 360: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 336: 332: 327: 323: 319: 315: 311: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 287: 283: 279: 275: 271: 266: 262: 258: 254: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 214: 210: 205: 201: 197: 193: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 161: 157: 153: 149: 2809:
in my youth). The most complicated part would be to 'protect' the image being 'deleted' (Administratively,
998:
and it's the first thing that came to mind. And I wanted to relink(if applicable) since it clutters up the
407: 2158: 2075: 1142: 1133: 765: 744: 737: 654: 2174: 2162: 1106: 1071: 1035: 897: 607: 2740: 2362: 2350: 1956: 1431:
Hi. I've recently found a number of edit summaries on my watchlist starting with "AWB assisted ...".
1178: 1162: 646: 633: 2357:? As big and popular as they may be, they really shouldn't listed by that name. Thus, I moved them to " 2293: 1909:.) you implemented the second alternative, although i know you didn't mean to prejudice the mediation. 1438:
If you don't mind, would you also leave a note for the developers whether you agree with me or not, at
1388:
Hi, remember me? We talked about disambigs about a year ago. I was just wondering what's going on with
1925: 1659:
would be a good place to discuss it. I will however subst welcome which is clearly on the subst list.
1174: 1158: 3198:
editing for a few months, but of course I still have a lot to learn about how things work. Thanks! --
2748: 2109: 2105: 1349: 1303: 588: 473: 456: 1717:
Presumably, if it's been userfied, then it didn't belong in the article namespace. The only one who
455:
I won't be the first ask, maybe I'm not, but what is the inspiration for the new colour signature?--
2965: 2469: 1906: 1210: 559: 529: 480: 1990: 1853: 1681: 1404:
You know what, I'm being stupid, I've just answered my own question. It isn't a disambig anymore!
425:
Thanks, but I'll wrap up the projects I'm already up to my neck in before taking on anything new.
3143: 3097: 2819: 2773: 2735: 2694: 2485: 1759: 1700:. This link is also available from the page history view which is available to you as an admin. - 1264: 1232: 1114: 1079: 1043: 960: 615: 452:
The new "/from template" sub-project has really rejuventated my interest in link repair, cheers.
2831: 1656: 1529: 1476: 2912: 2852: 2622: 2611: 2571: 2203: 2032: 2018: 1964: 1816: 1780: 1582: 1559: 1514: 1396:. Any thoughts? Has a decision been made to ignore it, did someone just miss it? Best regards 1010: 954: 910: 869: 822: 805: 780: 758: 419: 2008:
Glad you like the job I did there.(just don't take this opportunity to 'award' more jobs);-)
1941: 1684:
but everyone seemed to aware and talking of it. One of the articles I listed for undeletion (
3216: 3179: 3134: 3060: 3007: 2989: 2954: 2880: 2792: 2717: 2658: 2587: 2504: 2428: 2410:
doesn't seem to be current. Thanks for your help and all your tireless work on wikipedia. --
2387: 2322: 2243: 2191: 2137: 2091: 1831: 1796: 1731: 1628: 1596: 1542: 1489: 1448: 1325: 1253: 1094: 1059: 986: 930: 845: 725: 699: 643: 630: 629:, 4 people agreed with merge. I'm interested to know why was it deleted. Thank you. — 587:, which reports erroneous links from the article namespace to other namespaces. Thanks. -- 435: 396: 3092: 2600: 1913:
keeping in mind we have some mediation participants whose native language is not english.
1275:
The sample I tried appeared to be votes, and the article was now in existence when it said
917: 3069: 3043: 2937: 1343: 1297: 1284: 469: 3088: 3084: 2862:
Thanks for letting me know. I've already fixed that error. Sorry for the inconvenience.
2426:. BTW, if you're in need of a task, I know the bar is a thing of the past, but writing 959:
Ouch. That's not Dutch. That's German. FYI, it should link to the Academy Award. —
2925: 2863: 2178: 2146: 2117: 1649: 1615: 1608: 1571: 1521: 1194: 995: 943: 677: 661: 545: 515: 2897: 2815: 2769: 2690: 2626: 2560: 2481: 2411: 2358: 2252: 2227: 2166: 2052: 1111: 1103: 1076: 1068: 1040: 1032: 1028: 858: 832: 769: 612: 604: 3029:
back in March. Recently, a heavy metal project member moved it back and then edited
1974: 1969: 3229: 3199: 2972: 2905: 2845: 2604: 2564: 2437: 2219: 2200: 2124: 2025: 2011: 1992: 1976: 1929: 1917: 1902: 1898: 1882: 1809: 1773: 1003: 947: 903: 862: 815: 798: 773: 751: 502: 412: 3142:
Well, if you say so. I've put it in our 'help' section, do you think that's good?
3037:. I tried to get it moved back, but no consensus was reached on the vote--see the 1971: 1740:
userfication instead. You said were going to make a category out of it, I think. -
2683:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_June_15#Fabartus_user_categories
3207: 3170: 3125: 3051: 3034: 3030: 3026: 2998: 2980: 2945: 2871: 2783: 2760: 2727: 2708: 2649: 2578: 2548: 2495: 2402: 2378: 2313: 2234: 2182: 2128: 2082: 1822: 1787: 1741: 1722: 1701: 1660: 1619: 1587: 1533: 1499: 1480: 1468: 1444: 1420: 1405: 1397: 1316: 1244: 1085: 1050: 977: 921: 836: 827:
We don't normally do articles on first names - that's Wiktionary territory (see
716: 709: 690: 426: 391: 17: 1688:) was userfied. I don't know why it was userfied and where to look for it now. 3068:
Thanks! Go go manual of style! Oh, oops, now the talk page is disassociated. β€”
2556: 2552: 2544: 2433: 2224:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_January_8#Category:Seagaliana
2065: 1984: 1981: 1392:. There are 100s of links again (hardly suprising) but it is not mentioned on 498: 2596: 2145:
hey, if those philisteenz can't grasp the conexxion, i can't help them. --
667: 2215: 2048: 1890: 1878: 1874: 1860: 1711: 1689: 2294:
Knowledge (XXG):Redirect#Don't fix links to redirects that aren't broken
501:, as also in some other parts of India. And, a happy New Year to you. -- 1389: 487: 828: 2472: 2468:
there and it's hard to gauge it's exact magnitude using anything but
2354: 2043:
I think it would be good if you can put your two cents into it. See
1721:
to know that is the original author, who is supposed to be informed.
468:
will look into adding a few items. Thanks - hope all is going well. -
3091:
which explains that copyvios must be deleted wherever they are, and
1568:
we shouldn't worry about server load and templates at a policy level
1999: 1766:(or 0.08%) belong to administators", when it should say "of which 939: 811: 666: 491: 1852:
is up for deletion. Can I ask for a vote to "Transwiki". Thanks.
2841: 2100:
the community will then have to delete all of the categories in
1370: 976:
of the disambig page (see the notice at the top of this page).
900:
though, so all its really doing is taking up disk(disc) space.
789:
Yes, I think the best solution would be an article on the name
2251:
The lure of Seagaliana has wrecked many a life, I've heard. --
2165:? Seeing as thats blue, I'm afraid the salting didn't take. -- 2673: 1193: 1894: 1808:
You are right, I didn't notice the word "accounts". Sorry,
3021:
Hi there, I see that you moved (correctly, in my opinion)
1350: 2543:
at the bottom of the file to your username. Designed by:
3087:
which explains how to userfy (or indeed move anywhere),
2436:
disambiguation page contains nothing relevant. Cheers,
2233:
I throw my hands up and eschew involvement in this one.
2837: 1980:
American Heritage Dictionary: Japan, Sea of (East Sea)
1567: 1563: 1369: 1339: 1940:
trademark law, but wikipedia policies and practices.
1893:
itself should be a disambiguation page. (analogous to
2214:
No, its that it included his movies... Ti Kwan Do...
1955:
Encyclopedia Britannica: East Sea: see Japan, Sea of
2997:
I don't see the problem - seems to be working fine.
2838:
Your really going overboard supporting this :-)
2753:
Category:Maps showing the history of the Middle Ages
2453:'synopsis' with link, and the common debate on kept 1614:
The point may be moot - I note that someone has set
1566:
of a template-related server load problem, and that
942:, and I can't redirect it as I am not able to read 2674:Don't know if you saw my note on your commons page 1968:Columbia Encyclopedia: Japan, Sea of, or East Sea 1963:; Encarta Dictionary: East Sea: see Japan, Sea of 2494:Honestly, I'm not sure I understand the problem! 2199:It was deleted through CFD. I killed it again. -- 1243:manually recategorizing - I find it relaxes me. 1155:Please see my entry, and support me if possible! 490:of India, and these people mostly reside in the 2891:Knowledge (XXG):Enforce inclusion of categories 1394:Knowledge (XXG):Disambiguation pages with links 853:Very true, you may want to take a look at this 2648:Kinda too busy to think about it right now... 1889:would list the various other uses, or whether 994:Oh yea......:-) Sorry, I was just reading the 3224:I'll buy that and will edit the talk page at 2759:modeled category systems are the en.wiki and 8: 2298:Knowledge (XXG):Redirects with possibilities 2181:points out, there are many cats on persons. 2161:as the catchall for the deleted and salted 2736:User_talk:Dmcdevit#How_is_this_implimented 2625:, and work a lot like shell aliases... -- 2312:Egad, but I've almost finished! Oh well. 795:For other uses see Oscar (disambiguation) 603:You know me...eager to please. :-D 2460:My confidence is high that a structural 1951:text lists any other use of "east sea": 1465:Image talk:Global spread of H5N1 map.PNG 1414:Knowledge (XXG):Templates with red links 2276:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style (links) 671:My Legal Ignorance Was Eaten By A Bear! 2443: 1510:Do you know of a good reason to subst 2541:inc("User:Prodego/statuschanger.js"); 7: 3169:Yep, I think that's fine - thanks! 2703:Well, I'm not sure if I agree with 1873:at mediation is the content of the 1698:User:Jay/List of software companies 1505: 2377:Took a few shots at it... cheers! 1960:Encarta: East Sea: Japan, Sea of, 1762:has a typo in it saying "of which 24: 1132:and join that lively discussion. 34:By topic (prior to June 1, 2009): 2059:Hola! right back at yah :-) 3046:18:51, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 2975:00:32, 10 September 2006 (UTC) 2932:Transcendental (disambiguation) 2923:Just so I'm clear on this, the 1916:thanks for your understanding. 1305: 1298: 938:I was wondering as it links to 146:Dated (beginning June 1, 2009): 3012:17:48, 10 September 2006 (UTC) 2994:17:44, 10 September 2006 (UTC) 2290:Knowledge (XXG):Disambiguation 1973:; East Sea: See Japan, Sea of 1782:22:26, 28 February 2006 (UTC) 1770:(or 0.08%) are administators" 1714:18:52, 25 February 2006 (UTC) 1706:18:36, 25 February 2006 (UTC) 1692:18:31, 25 February 2006 (UTC) 1652:15:32, 22 February 2006 (UTC) 1611:15:21, 22 February 2006 (UTC) 1601:15:16, 22 February 2006 (UTC) 1530:WP:SUBST#Reasons to substitute 1524:07:08, 22 February 2006 (UTC) 1502:00:00, 23 February 2006 (UTC) 1477:WP:SUBST#Reasons to substitute 1471:07:01, 22 February 2006 (UTC) 1423:08:50, 11 February 2006 (UTC) 1169:) 18:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC) 768:, some of the changes made by 712:09:03, 26 December 2005 (UTC) 704:03:51, 26 December 2005 (UTC) 664:01:43, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 636:21:04, 22 December 2005 (UTC) 617:20:09, 22 December 2005 (UTC) 595:03:35, 16 December 2005 (UTC) 537:17:23, 13 December 2005 (UTC) 505:15:58, 11 December 2005 (UTC) 1: 2840:. Perhaps it is time someone 2811:moved 'internally' but copied 2373:. 22:20, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 2102:Category:Categories_by_person 2055:) 17:31, 13 March 2006 (UTC) 1983:; East Sea: See Sea of Japan 1801:23:01, 28 February 2006 (UTC) 1746:19:06, 25 February 2006 (UTC) 1736:18:58, 25 February 2006 (UTC) 1663:04:08, 23 February 2006 (UTC) 1633:15:24, 22 February 2006 (UTC) 1574:15:11, 22 February 2006 (UTC) 1547:13:38, 22 February 2006 (UTC) 1494:13:37, 22 February 2006 (UTC) 1400:17:24, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 1310:19:03, 30 January 2006 (UTC) 1287:16:25, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 1267:06:52, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 1235:01:25, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 1213:15:23, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 1205:together; it's just what our 1185:) 18:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC) 730:15:33, 26 December 2005 (UTC) 680:06:39, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 649:20:54, 23 December 2005 (UTC) 567:14:55, 18 December 2005 (UTC) 509:Spaces in your bot's articles 476:23:06, 8 December 2005 (UTC) 459:22:55, 8 December 2005 (UTC) 421:19:11, 8 December 2005 (UTC) 398:13:10, August 10, 2005 (UTC) 25: 3221:17:58, 8 October 2006 (UTC) 3202:03:40, 7 October 2006 (UTC) 3193:Disambiguation page question 3166:14:45, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 3139:14:40, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 3120:11:10, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 3065:22:52, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 3039:iron maiden (disambiguation) 3023:iron maiden (disambiguation) 3017:Iron maiden (disambiguation) 2940:16:21, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 2870:Thanks for letting me know! 2518:I can't believe you use the 2045:User:MyNameIsNotBob/East_Sea 1453:2006-02-20 05:34 Z 1408:17:26, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 1330:19:13, 30 January 2006 (UTC) 1258:01:28, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 1136:05:44, 6 January 2006 (UTC) 1099:01:06, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1081:00:50, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1064:00:28, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1045:00:13, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 991:03:39, 4 January 2006 (UTC) 956:03:34, 4 January 2006 (UTC) 935:03:08, 4 January 2006 (UTC) 912:03:03, 4 January 2006 (UTC) 894:criteria for speedy deletion 850:02:28, 4 January 2006 (UTC) 824:02:25, 4 January 2006 (UTC) 807:02:20, 4 January 2006 (UTC) 760:20:13, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 715:Only wistfully so. :-D 440:19:43, 8 December 2005 (UTC) 3232:18:33, 8 October 2006 (UTC) 3184:18:30, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 3072:03:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC) 3050:I'll look into it. Cheers! 2959:16:33, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 2900:01:53, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2842:submitted a feature request 2705:Category:Fabartus user page 2248:19:26, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 2230:19:22, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 2196:19:19, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 2169:19:15, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 2142:19:05, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 2120:19:00, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 2096:18:57, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 2068:01:20, 29 March 2006 (UTC) 2020:13:36, 11 March 2006 (UTC) 2005:Yes sir boss! No problem! 1995:17:23, 13 March 2006 (UTC) 1920:00:32, 11 March 2006 (UTC) 1506:Subst'ing unsigned template 1145:06:06, 6 January 2006 (UTC) 1116:04:21, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1012:16:08, 4 January 2006 (UTC) 970:06:58, 4 January 2006 (UTC) 871:02:47, 4 January 2006 (UTC) 810:Nice job, and good idea on 782:20:35, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 585:Special:CrossNamespaceLinks 3253: 2914:22:48, 6 August 2006 (UTC) 2866:00:06, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 2778:11:57, 29 June 2006 (UTC) 2699:18:37, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 2613:15:09, 15 June 2006 (UTC) 2592:15:03, 15 June 2006 (UTC) 2573:15:01, 15 June 2006 (UTC) 2490:15:50, 14 June 2006 (UTC) 2444:I'd like your take on this 2392:12:42, 9 August 2006 (UTC) 2340:15:10, 31 March 2006 (UTC) 2327:13:52, 31 March 2006 (UTC) 2309:13:50, 31 March 2006 (UTC) 2255:19:32, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 2205:19:20, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 2149:19:07, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 2034:20:07, 11 March 2006 (UTC) 1932:00:44, 11 March 2006 (UTC) 1856:23:48, 2 March 2006 (UTC) 1850:Revolution within the form 1818:00:01, 1 March 2006 (UTC) 1686:List of software companies 2885:00:21, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 2854:16:04, 7 July 2006 (UTC) 2797:12:53, 29 June 2006 (UTC) 2745:Category:Byzantine mosaic 2722:18:57, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 2663:23:47, 15 June 2006 (UTC) 2629:23:41, 15 June 2006 (UTC) 2509:19:25, 14 June 2006 (UTC) 2479:Advice? Best regards! // 2448:I've been 'bugged' by my 2440:20:13, 13 May 2006 (UTC) 2424:the Wikiproject talk page 2414:06:33, 11 May 2006 (UTC) 2104:. such as the categories 1887:East Sea (disambiguation) 1865:East Sea (disambiguation) 1836:00:32, 1 March 2006 (UTC) 743:Could you take a look at 3226:Swedish (disambiguation) 2824:04:22, 1 July 2006 (UTC) 2173:Wasn't the problem with 2157:Uh oh, is someone using 2114:Category:Michael Jackson 1926:User:Appleby/Sea#Sources 1419:...has been updated. -- 1279:, and gone when it said 1190:Templates with red links 580:Tax protester/Archive 01 574:Tax protester/Archive 01 508: 3228:accordingly. Thanks. -- 2929:page is preferred over 2595:That is true. Although 2462:problem in presentation 1581:I had not noticed that 685:Quick null edit request 2597:they are working on it 2406:SCOTUS project pages? 2302: 2285: 2274:to bypass redirects? 2159:Category:Steven Seagal 2076:Category:Steven Seagal 1682:Knowledge (XXG):Jargon 1291:Template with redlinks 1201:Thank you for putting 1199: 857:quite a discussion on 672: 655:Template:User democrat 625:Out of the 6 votes at 2741:Category:Medieval art 2345:Hey, remember when... 2338:William Allen Simpson 2307:William Allen Simpson 2286: 2280: 2177:the unusual name? As 1897:, which redirects to 1821:No problem! :-) 1197: 670: 3033:to be a redirect to 2749:Category:Middle Ages 2371:See what I've edited 2110:Category:Bing Crosby 2106:Category:Hilary Duff 1944:, in relevant part: 1440:talk:AutoWikiBrowser 1379:06:47, Jan. 21, 2006 855:the MoS:DP talk page 708:Are you serious? -- 2966:Template:CodeFedReg 2266:bypassing redirects 2175:Category:Seagaliana 2163:Category:Seagaliana 2039:More about East Sea 1907:CD (disambiguation) 1881:should redirect to 1564:he sees no evidence 1150:Rollback priveleges 481:Tribes of Jharkhand 1760:Special:Statistics 1755:Special:Statistics 1555:fix problems, etc. 1463:I noticed that on 1200: 1127:Your MoS:DP remark 673: 3240: 3239: 2979:Having a look... 2806:less than correct 2397:SCOTUS case boxes 1845:Page for deletion 1745: 1705: 1459:Template:Unsigned 1454: 1380: 1376: 1362: 1354: 1308: 1271:Single anon edits 1216:Category renaming 1143:Chris the speller 1134:Chris the speller 1027:You wanna tackle 463:Template:Matrices 3244: 3214: 3177: 3163: 3161: 3159: 3157: 3155: 3132: 3117: 3115: 3113: 3111: 3109: 3058: 3005: 2987: 2952: 2910: 2878: 2850: 2822: 2790: 2776: 2734:Hi! Take a peek 2730:and en.wikipedia 2715: 2697: 2656: 2609: 2585: 2569: 2542: 2520:default monobook 2502: 2488: 2429:Jones v. Flowers 2385: 2363:ACS (Wikipedian) 2351:Ace Class Shadow 2320: 2241: 2189: 2135: 2089: 2030: 2016: 1885:, in which case 1829: 1814: 1794: 1778: 1744: 1729: 1704: 1626: 1594: 1540: 1519: 1513: 1487: 1452: 1378: 1374: 1372: 1366: 1363: 1356: 1352: 1323: 1307: 1304: 1300: 1251: 1229: 1225:categoryredirect 1223: 1109: 1092: 1074: 1057: 1038: 1008: 984: 963: 952: 928: 908: 867: 861:going on there. 843: 820: 803: 778: 756: 723: 697: 641: 610: 565: 562: 557: 554: 551: 548: 535: 532: 527: 524: 521: 518: 433: 417: 394: 26: 3252: 3251: 3247: 3246: 3245: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3208: 3195: 3171: 3153: 3151: 3149: 3147: 3145: 3126: 3107: 3105: 3103: 3101: 3099: 3081: 3052: 3019: 2999: 2981: 2969: 2946: 2921: 2906: 2894: 2872: 2860: 2846: 2835: 2820: 2784: 2774: 2765:sister projects 2732: 2709: 2695: 2676: 2650: 2639: 2605: 2579: 2565: 2540: 2516: 2514:Custom monobook 2496: 2486: 2446: 2420: 2399: 2379: 2367:Talk to the Ace 2347: 2314: 2268: 2235: 2183: 2129: 2083: 2079: 2071: 2061: 2041: 2026: 2012: 2003: 1868: 1847: 1823: 1810: 1788: 1774: 1757: 1723: 1678: 1620: 1588: 1558:Lead developer 1534: 1517: 1511: 1508: 1481: 1461: 1429: 1417: 1386: 1368: 1360: 1344:hip hop culture 1337: 1317: 1293: 1285:Septentrionalis 1273: 1245: 1227: 1221: 1218: 1192: 1152: 1129: 1107: 1086: 1072: 1051: 1036: 1025: 1004: 1000:What links here 978: 961: 948: 922: 904: 886: 863: 837: 816: 799: 774: 752: 741: 717: 691: 687: 658: 640: 627:this nomination 623: 608: 601: 589:Finlay McWalter 576: 563: 560: 555: 552: 549: 546: 533: 530: 525: 522: 519: 516: 511: 484: 465: 457:Commander Keane 447: 427: 413: 408:Proxy blocking! 404: 392: 143: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3250: 3248: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3234: 3233: 3194: 3191: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3186: 3185: 3083:In particular 3080: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3074: 3073: 3018: 3015: 3014: 3013: 2995: 2968: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2926:Transcendental 2920: 2919:Disambiguation 2917: 2916: 2915: 2893: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2859: 2856: 2834: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2799: 2798: 2731: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2675: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2618: 2515: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2445: 2442: 2419: 2418:SCOTUS infobox 2416: 2398: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2346: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2329: 2328: 2310: 2267: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2078: 2073: 2060: 2057: 2047:. Thanks. -- 2040: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2002: 1997: 1987: 1986: 1978: 1966: 1958: 1934: 1933: 1877:page: whether 1867: 1858: 1846: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1803: 1802: 1756: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1737: 1677: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1605: 1586:uses. Cheers! 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1562:has said that 1556: 1549: 1548: 1507: 1504: 1496: 1495: 1460: 1457: 1428: 1425: 1416: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1385: 1382: 1358: 1336: 1335:opinion sought 1333: 1332: 1331: 1292: 1289: 1272: 1269: 1265:Samuel Wantman 1260: 1259: 1233:Samuel Wantman 1217: 1214: 1211:Kirill Lokshin 1191: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1151: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1128: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1031:or should I? 1024: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 996:Dutch article 972: 971: 885: 882: 881: 880: 879: 878: 877: 876: 875: 874: 873: 872: 784: 783: 740: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 686: 683: 682: 681: 657: 652: 651: 650: 622: 619: 600: 597: 575: 572: 571: 570: 569: 568: 510: 507: 483: 478: 464: 461: 446: 443: 442: 441: 403: 400: 388: 387: 330: 269: 208: 147: 142: 141: 80: 35: 32: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3249: 3231: 3227: 3223: 3222: 3220: 3219: 3215: 3213: 3212: 3205: 3204: 3203: 3201: 3192: 3183: 3182: 3178: 3176: 3175: 3168: 3167: 3165: 3164: 3141: 3140: 3138: 3137: 3133: 3131: 3130: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3119: 3118: 3094: 3090: 3086: 3078: 3071: 3067: 3066: 3064: 3063: 3059: 3057: 3056: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3045: 3040: 3036: 3032: 3028: 3024: 3016: 3011: 3010: 3006: 3004: 3003: 2996: 2993: 2992: 2988: 2986: 2985: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2974: 2967: 2964:Problem with 2963: 2958: 2957: 2953: 2951: 2950: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2939: 2934: 2933: 2928: 2927: 2918: 2913: 2911: 2909: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2899: 2892: 2889: 2884: 2883: 2879: 2877: 2876: 2869: 2868: 2867: 2865: 2857: 2855: 2853: 2851: 2849: 2843: 2839: 2833: 2830: 2823: 2818: 2817: 2812: 2807: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2796: 2795: 2791: 2789: 2788: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2777: 2772: 2771: 2766: 2762: 2756: 2754: 2750: 2746: 2742: 2737: 2729: 2726: 2721: 2720: 2716: 2714: 2713: 2706: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2698: 2693: 2692: 2686: 2684: 2679: 2662: 2661: 2657: 2655: 2654: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2628: 2624: 2619: 2615: 2614: 2612: 2610: 2608: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2593: 2591: 2590: 2586: 2584: 2583: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2572: 2570: 2568: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2550: 2546: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2521: 2513: 2508: 2507: 2503: 2501: 2500: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2489: 2484: 2483: 2478: 2474: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2458: 2456: 2451: 2441: 2439: 2435: 2431: 2430: 2425: 2417: 2415: 2413: 2409: 2404: 2396: 2391: 2390: 2386: 2384: 2383: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2372: 2368: 2364: 2360: 2359:Rancid (band) 2356: 2352: 2344: 2339: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2326: 2325: 2321: 2319: 2318: 2311: 2308: 2304: 2303: 2301: 2299: 2295: 2291: 2284: 2279: 2277: 2273: 2265: 2254: 2250: 2249: 2247: 2246: 2242: 2240: 2239: 2232: 2231: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2204: 2202: 2198: 2197: 2195: 2194: 2190: 2188: 2187: 2180: 2176: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2148: 2144: 2143: 2141: 2140: 2136: 2134: 2133: 2126: 2122: 2121: 2119: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2095: 2094: 2090: 2088: 2087: 2077: 2074: 2072: 2069: 2067: 2058: 2056: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2038: 2033: 2031: 2029: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2019: 2017: 2015: 2009: 2006: 2001: 1998: 1996: 1994: 1991: 1985: 1982: 1979: 1977: 1975: 1972: 1970: 1967: 1965: 1962: 1959: 1957: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1948: 1945: 1943: 1937: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1919: 1914: 1910: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1876: 1871: 1866: 1862: 1859: 1857: 1855: 1851: 1844: 1835: 1834: 1830: 1828: 1827: 1820: 1819: 1817: 1815: 1813: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1800: 1799: 1795: 1793: 1792: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1781: 1779: 1777: 1771: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1754: 1743: 1738: 1735: 1734: 1730: 1728: 1727: 1720: 1716: 1715: 1713: 1708: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1675: 1662: 1658: 1654: 1653: 1651: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1632: 1631: 1627: 1625: 1624: 1618:to the task! 1617: 1613: 1612: 1610: 1606: 1603: 1602: 1600: 1599: 1595: 1593: 1592: 1584: 1580: 1579: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1546: 1545: 1541: 1539: 1538: 1531: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1523: 1516: 1503: 1501: 1493: 1492: 1488: 1486: 1485: 1478: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1470: 1466: 1458: 1456: 1455: 1450: 1446: 1441: 1436: 1432: 1426: 1424: 1422: 1415: 1412: 1407: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1383: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1365: 1364: 1345: 1341: 1334: 1329: 1328: 1324: 1322: 1321: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1309: 1301: 1290: 1288: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1270: 1268: 1266: 1257: 1256: 1252: 1250: 1249: 1242: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1234: 1226: 1215: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1196: 1189: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1149: 1144: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1135: 1126: 1115: 1113: 1110: 1105: 1101: 1100: 1098: 1097: 1093: 1091: 1090: 1083: 1082: 1080: 1078: 1075: 1070: 1066: 1065: 1063: 1062: 1058: 1056: 1055: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1044: 1042: 1039: 1034: 1030: 1029:Israel Shamir 1022: 1011: 1009: 1007: 1001: 997: 993: 992: 990: 989: 985: 983: 982: 974: 973: 969: 968: 964: 962:Nightstallion 958: 957: 955: 953: 951: 945: 941: 937: 936: 934: 933: 929: 927: 926: 919: 915: 914: 913: 911: 909: 907: 901: 899: 895: 891: 883: 870: 868: 866: 860: 856: 852: 851: 849: 848: 844: 842: 841: 835:links there! 834: 833:Academy Award 830: 826: 825: 823: 821: 819: 813: 809: 808: 806: 804: 802: 796: 792: 788: 787: 786: 785: 781: 779: 777: 771: 767: 763: 762: 761: 759: 757: 755: 749: 746: 739: 736: 729: 728: 724: 722: 721: 714: 713: 711: 707: 706: 705: 703: 702: 698: 696: 695: 684: 679: 675: 674: 669: 665: 663: 656: 653: 648: 645: 639: 638: 637: 635: 632: 628: 620: 618: 616: 614: 611: 606: 598: 596: 594: 590: 586: 581: 573: 566: 558: 542: 541: 540: 539: 538: 536: 528: 506: 504: 500: 496: 493: 489: 482: 479: 477: 475: 471: 462: 460: 458: 453: 450: 444: 439: 438: 434: 432: 431: 424: 423: 422: 420: 418: 416: 410: 409: 401: 399: 397: 395: 386: 382: 378: 374: 370: 366: 362: 358: 354: 350: 346: 342: 338: 334: 331: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 309: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 285: 281: 277: 273: 270: 268: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 244: 240: 236: 232: 228: 224: 220: 216: 212: 209: 207: 203: 199: 195: 191: 187: 183: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 151: 148: 145: 144: 140: 136: 132: 128: 124: 120: 116: 112: 108: 104: 100: 96: 92: 88: 84: 81: 79: 75: 71: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 47: 43: 39: 36: 33: 30: 29: 28: 27: 19: 3217: 3210: 3209: 3196: 3180: 3173: 3172: 3144: 3135: 3128: 3127: 3098: 3082: 3061: 3054: 3053: 3020: 3008: 3001: 3000: 2990: 2983: 2982: 2970: 2955: 2948: 2947: 2930: 2924: 2922: 2907: 2895: 2881: 2874: 2873: 2861: 2858:WatchlistBot 2847: 2836: 2814: 2810: 2805: 2793: 2786: 2785: 2768: 2767:. Thanks // 2757: 2733: 2718: 2711: 2710: 2689: 2687: 2680: 2677: 2659: 2652: 2651: 2606: 2588: 2581: 2580: 2566: 2535: 2534:), they add 2519: 2517: 2505: 2498: 2497: 2480: 2476: 2465: 2461: 2459: 2449: 2447: 2427: 2421: 2400: 2388: 2381: 2380: 2348: 2330: 2323: 2316: 2315: 2287: 2281: 2271: 2269: 2244: 2237: 2236: 2220:Kitchen sink 2192: 2185: 2184: 2156: 2138: 2131: 2130: 2125:groin attack 2092: 2085: 2084: 2080: 2070: 2062: 2042: 2027: 2013: 2010: 2007: 2004: 1988: 1949: 1946: 1938: 1935: 1915: 1911: 1905:hatnotes to 1903:Compact disc 1899:Compact disc 1883:Sea of Japan 1872: 1869: 1848: 1832: 1825: 1824: 1811: 1797: 1790: 1789: 1775: 1772: 1767: 1763: 1758: 1732: 1725: 1724: 1718: 1679: 1676:Userfication 1629: 1622: 1621: 1597: 1590: 1589: 1583:Brion VIBBER 1560:Brion VIBBER 1543: 1536: 1535: 1518:}} 1512:{{ 1509: 1497: 1490: 1483: 1482: 1462: 1443: 1442:? Thanks, 1437: 1433: 1430: 1427:Edit summary 1418: 1387: 1348: 1347: 1338: 1326: 1319: 1318: 1294: 1280: 1276: 1274: 1261: 1254: 1247: 1246: 1240: 1228:}} 1222:{{ 1219: 1153: 1130: 1095: 1088: 1087: 1060: 1053: 1052: 1026: 1005: 999: 987: 980: 979: 966: 949: 931: 924: 923: 905: 902: 898:user subpage 887: 864: 846: 839: 838: 817: 800: 794: 790: 775: 753: 750: 742: 726: 719: 718: 700: 693: 692: 688: 659: 624: 602: 578:The article 577: 512: 485: 466: 454: 451: 448: 436: 429: 428: 414: 411: 405: 393: BD2412 389: 130: 3035:Iron Maiden 3031:iron maiden 3027:iron maiden 2761:the commons 2728:the commons 2599: ;-). 1175:TheDoctor10 1159:TheDoctor10 1023:ugh dabbing 18:User:BD2412 3070:pfahlstrom 3044:pfahlstrom 2938:Loadmaster 2450:hot button 2434:redemption 2127:already). 1498:Thanks. – 1299:Birgitte§β 764:I changed 621:AfD result 599:re: Hebrew 445:Holy crap! 2473:reasoning 2470:inductive 2455:this page 2179:Ghetteaux 2147:Ghetteaux 2118:Ghetteaux 2116:, etc. -- 1650:Omegatron 1648:*Sigh* β€” 1609:Omegatron 1572:Omegatron 1522:Omegatron 1384:Disambigs 1340:This edit 1203:this list 892:meet the 890:this page 793:, with a 678:karmafist 662:karmafist 499:Jharkhand 139:Vandalism 2898:Stormbay 2832:WP:DUU90 2627:Interiot 2623:keymarks 2617:version. 2561:Interiot 2466:severity 2412:Kchase02 2408:Skyler's 2349:Gidday. 2253:Syrthiss 2228:Syrthiss 2216:Ponytail 2167:Syrthiss 1901:, & 1891:East Sea 1879:East Sea 1875:East Sea 1861:East Sea 1657:WP:SUBST 1515:unsigned 797:header. 770:Tedernst 488:adivasis 46:Deletion 38:Articles 31:Archives 3230:Tkynerd 3200:Tkynerd 2973:Eastlaw 2908:Prodego 2848:Prodego 2607:Prodego 2567:Prodego 2438:Postdlf 2226:. =D -- 2201:GraemeL 2028:Prodego 2014:Prodego 1993:Appleby 1942:WP:NPOV 1930:Appleby 1918:Appleby 1854:WHEELER 1812:Prodego 1776:Prodego 1445:Michael 1390:British 1353:REAK OF 1209:needs. 1207:project 1198:Thanks! 1006:Prodego 950:Prodego 906:Prodego 884:Speedy? 865:Prodego 818:Prodego 801:Prodego 776:Prodego 754:Prodego 503:Bhadani 474:vertigo 415:Prodego 402:Proxies 3211:bd2412 3174:bd2412 3129:bd2412 3093:WP:AFD 3079:Userfy 3055:bd2412 3002:bd2412 2984:bd2412 2949:bd2412 2875:bd2412 2864:Ingrid 2787:bd2412 2712:BD2412 2653:BD2412 2601:Popups 2582:BD2412 2549:Korath 2499:BD2412 2382:bd2412 2355:Rancid 2317:BD2412 2296:, and 2238:BD2412 2186:BD2412 2132:BD2412 2086:BD2412 1826:BD2412 1791:BD2412 1742:Splash 1726:BD2412 1702:Splash 1661:Tawker 1623:BD2412 1591:BD2412 1537:BD2412 1500:Zntrip 1484:BD2412 1469:Zntrip 1451:  1447:  1421:Beland 1406:Mark83 1398:Mark83 1320:BD2412 1281:delete 1248:BD2412 1239:But I 1089:BD2412 1054:BD2412 1049:Done. 1002:page. 981:BD2412 925:BD2412 918:WP:MFD 840:BD2412 720:BD2412 710:Beland 694:BD2412 647:ntnood 634:ntnood 492:Indian 430:BD2412 3089:WP:CP 3085:WP:MM 2557:Lupin 2553:OwenX 2545:Topaz 2536:a lot 2218:... 2066:Bobak 2000:Oscar 1719:needs 1616:a bot 1241:enjoy 1183:email 1167:email 944:Dutch 940:Oscar 888:Does 829:Oscar 812:Oscar 791:Oscar 766:Oscar 745:Oscar 738:Oscar 644:Insta 631:Insta 495:state 123:Tools 83:Misc. 16:< 3162:< 3146:> 3116:< 3100:> 2681:re: 2528:.css 2053:talk 1863:and 1371:TALK 1361:TURE 1306:Talk 1277:Keep 1179:talk 1163:talk 593:Talk 3025:to 2821:nkB 2816:Fra 2775:nkB 2770:Fra 2696:nkB 2691:Fra 2524:.js 2487:nkB 2482:Fra 2403:Roe 2300:.) 2272:not 2222:. 2049:Nlu 1768:829 1764:829 1712:Jay 1690:Jay 1104:Tom 1069:Tom 1033:Tom 967:(?) 859:Ted 605:Tom 556:493 526:493 497:of 470:Ste 385:059 381:058 377:057 373:056 369:055 365:054 361:053 357:052 353:051 349:050 345:049 341:048 337:047 333:046 328:045 324:044 320:043 316:042 312:041 308:040 304:039 300:038 296:037 292:036 288:035 284:034 280:033 276:032 272:031 267:030 263:029 259:028 255:027 251:026 247:025 243:024 239:023 235:022 231:021 227:020 223:019 219:018 215:017 211:016 206:015 202:014 198:013 194:012 190:011 186:010 182:009 178:008 174:007 170:006 166:005 162:004 158:003 154:002 150:001 135:3rd 131:2nd 127:1st 119:4th 107:1st 103:RfA 99:4th 87:1st 78:5th 74:4th 62:1st 58:Law 50:1st 42:1st 2844:? 2751:, 2747:, 2743:, 2563:. 2559:, 2555:, 2551:, 2547:, 2532:sc 2369:. 2365:; 2336:-- 2305:-- 2292:, 2278:: 2112:, 2108:, 1895:CD 1449:Z. 1357:UR 1302:ʈ 1157:-- 946:. 920:. 591:| 564:lk 561:Ta 553:ns 550:yo 547:Dl 534:lk 531:Ta 523:ns 520:yo 517:Dl 115:3d 111:2d 95:3d 91:2d 70:3d 66:2d 54:2d 3218:T 3181:T 3160:t 3158:n 3156:a 3154:i 3152:d 3150:a 3148:R 3136:T 3114:t 3112:n 3110:a 3108:i 3106:d 3104:a 3102:R 3062:T 3042:β€” 3009:T 2991:T 2956:T 2882:T 2794:T 2719:T 2660:T 2589:T 2530:| 2526:| 2506:T 2389:T 2324:T 2245:T 2193:T 2139:T 2093:T 2051:( 1833:T 1798:T 1733:T 1630:T 1598:T 1544:T 1491:T 1375:) 1367:( 1359:x 1355:N 1351:F 1327:T 1255:T 1181:| 1177:( 1165:| 1161:( 1112:r 1108:e 1096:T 1077:r 1073:e 1061:T 1041:r 1037:e 988:T 932:T 847:T 727:T 701:T 613:r 609:e 472:| 437:T 383:- 379:- 375:- 371:- 367:- 363:- 359:- 355:- 351:- 347:- 343:- 339:- 335:- 326:- 322:- 318:- 314:- 310:- 306:- 302:- 298:- 294:- 290:- 286:- 282:- 278:- 274:- 265:- 261:- 257:- 253:- 249:- 245:- 241:- 237:- 233:- 229:- 225:- 221:- 217:- 213:- 204:- 200:- 196:- 192:- 188:- 184:- 180:- 176:- 172:- 168:- 164:- 160:- 156:- 152:- 137:/ 133:- 129:- 125:- 121:/ 117:- 113:- 109:- 105:- 101:/ 97:- 93:- 89:- 85:- 76:- 72:- 68:- 64:- 60:- 56:/ 52:- 48:- 44:/ 40:-

Index

User:BD2412
Articles
1st
Deletion
1st
2d
Law
1st
2d
3d
4th
5th
Misc.
1st
2d
3d
4th
RfA
1st
2d
3d
4th
Tools
1st
2nd
3rd
Vandalism
001
002
003

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑