Knowledge (XXG)

User:GreenC

Source đź“ť

162:'s transparent and egalitarian model does not prevent the most active contributors from obtaining significant and disproportionate control over those projects. In particular, the study found that as wiki communities grow 1) they are less likely to add new administrators; 2) the number of edits made by administrators to administrative “project” pages will increase and 3) the number of edits made by experienced contributors that are reverted by administrators also grows. The authors also note that while there are some interesting exceptions to this rule, proving that wikis can, on occasion, function as egalitarian, democratic public spaces, on average "as wikis become larger and more complex, a small group â€“ present at the beginning â€“ will restrict entry into positions of formal authority in the community and account for more administrative activity while using their authority to restrict contributions from experienced community members". 173:: "Declaring the notion of an administrative cabal is laughable on the surface.. but there is a grain of truth to it – admins talk to one another, including privately, "secretly" and off wiki, and they act, more or less consciously, as a part of a group that holds power over regular editors. Jemielniak argues that the notion of editor equality is a subconscious, invisible and unrealistic pillar of Knowledge (XXG), one that when confronted with the reality of editors not being equal leads to problems and growing divisions within the community. Thus the inequality between editors, which in the "ideal Knowledge (XXG)" would not exist, subconsciously annoys editors, and is significantly responsible for the problems with retention of editors, electing new administrators, and cohesion of the community, of whom a significant portion entertains some notions of the existence of a "real cabal" (see 64: 245: 117: 40: 255: 93: 107: 267: 210:) - a terribly encouraging article. Knowledge (XXG) is emerging as a model of what works for Internet discourse on controversial topics. Might our guidelines and policies be enshrined someday into a broader generic set that could be applied for any website who wished to adopt them in a Constitutional manner? 126:
I have ever witnessed, with editors and administrators giving conflicting and confusing advice, complaints getting “boomeranged” onto complainants who then face disciplinary action for complaining, and very little consistency in the standards applied. In my short time there, I repeatedly observed
200:, a study finds that after the creation of a Knowledge (XXG) article about a publicly traded company, its stock price drops. Apparently, insiders and institutional investors see an article (ie. transparency) as signifying they no longer have an edge on investing information. 223:"The longer a person has lived the less he gains by reading, and the more likely he is to forget what he has read and learnt of old; and the only remedy that I know of is to write upon every subject that he wishes to understand, even if he burns what he has written." -- 187:, a class of elitist editors who get away with incivility because they make good contributions. As Wales said, "it's a shame that some in the community think that it's worthwhile putting up with nasty people if they make good contributions." 177:). In this, his research fits into the wider paradigm of scholarly literature concerned with social inequality, and with its common conclusion that inequality is the major cause of the vast majority of problems in human society. 310: 300: 128: 305: 203: 234: 127:
editors lawyering an issue with acronyms, only to turn around and declare “Ignore all rules!” when faced with the same rules used against them. -- David Auerbach,
230: 197: 274: 163: 214: 71: 178: 282: 224: 63: 286: 77: 155: 147: 174: 281:
for his contributions to Knowledge (XXG). This funding is for the ongoing development of
278: 184: 116: 294: 244: 17: 106: 254: 92: 122: 97: 120:"I am not exaggerating when I say it is the closest thing to Kafka's 253: 243: 151: 115: 105: 91: 159: 204:"Knowledge (XXG) is fixing one of the Internet’s biggest flaws" 311:
Members of the Twenty Year Society of Knowledge (XXG) editors
26: 215:"Persistent Bias on Knowledge (XXG): Methods and Responses" 233:- these are among my favorite essays. For example, 301:Wikipedians interested in environmental protection 235:Knowledge (XXG):The problem with elegant variation 273:, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's 306:Knowledge (XXG) Articles for Creation reviewers 48:21 years, 3 months and 15 days 8: 154:wikis found support for the claims that the 231:Category:Knowledge (XXG) essays about style 169:From a book review of Dariusz Jemielniak's 46:This user has been on Knowledge (XXG) for 277:, discloses that he has been paid by 7: 227:, polymath, deciphered Rosetta Stone 58: 34: 25: 265: 62: 38: 219:Social Science Computer Review 158:holds in wikis; i.e. that the 1: 285:and working with aspects of 327: 78:Sustainability Initiative 287:User:InternetArchiveBot 101:Knowledge (XXG) Patriot 261: 251: 213:Martin, Brian (2017). 136: 113: 103: 257: 247: 156:iron law of oligarchy 144:Iron Law of Oligarchy 119: 109: 95: 259:Article for Creation 249:Article for Deletion 192:On different notes.. 129:"Encyclopedia Frown" 18:User:Green Cardamom 262: 260: 252: 250: 198:"Crowd Governance" 137: 114: 112: 104: 102: 258: 248: 111:Ignored all rules 110: 96: 89: 88: 84: 83: 55: 54: 16:(Redirected from 318: 279:Internet Archive 269: 268: 185:The Unblockables 171:Common Knowledge 66: 59: 51: 42: 41: 35: 27: 21: 326: 325: 321: 320: 319: 317: 316: 315: 291: 290: 266: 263: 241: 208:Washington Post 148:empirical study 139: 135:, December 2014 100: 90: 85: 75:the Wikimedia 56: 45: 39: 32: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 324: 322: 314: 313: 308: 303: 293: 292: 239: 238: 228: 221: 211: 201: 194: 193: 189: 188: 181: 180: 166: 165: 98:Sam Eagle, Sr. 87: 86: 82: 81: 67: 57: 53: 52: 43: 33: 30: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 323: 312: 309: 307: 304: 302: 299: 298: 296: 289: 288: 284: 280: 276: 272: 256: 246: 242: 236: 232: 229: 226: 222: 220: 216: 212: 209: 205: 202: 199: 196: 195: 191: 190: 186: 183: 182: 179: 176: 172: 168: 167: 164: 161: 157: 153: 149: 145: 142: 141: 140: 134: 130: 125: 124: 118: 108: 99: 94: 80: 79: 74: 73: 68: 65: 61: 60: 49: 44: 37: 36: 29: 28: 19: 283:WaybackMedic 275:Terms of Use 270: 264: 240: 225:Thomas Young 218: 207: 170: 143: 138: 132: 121: 76: 70: 47: 295:Categories 69:This user 123:The Trial 31:Userboxes 175:WP:CABAL 72:supports 150:of 683 271:GreenC 152:Wikia 146:: An 133:Slate 160:wiki 297:: 217:. 131:, 237:. 206:( 50:. 20:)

Index

User:Green Cardamom

supports
Sustainability Initiative

Sam Eagle, Sr.


The Trial
"Encyclopedia Frown"
empirical study
Wikia
iron law of oligarchy
wiki

WP:CABAL

The Unblockables
"Crowd Governance"
"Knowledge (XXG) is fixing one of the Internet’s biggest flaws"
"Persistent Bias on Knowledge (XXG): Methods and Responses"
Thomas Young
Category:Knowledge (XXG) essays about style
Knowledge (XXG):The problem with elegant variation


GreenC
Terms of Use
Internet Archive
WaybackMedic

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑