User:Philcha/Sandbox

1057:{{subst:NewDYKnom | article = Example | status = new or expanded  | hook = ... that this ] is an ''']''' ''(pictured)''? | alt1 = | alt2 = | author = User1 | nominator = User2 | image = Example.png | rollover = An example image | alttext = Description of the image | comment = | reviewed = Article you reviewed | revieweddiff = diff link to the article review }} 1104: 1151: 1180: 1086: 827: 1122: 836: 771:

every now and again to see what's happening (if anything) with some of the oldest reviews. Sometimes people need to be prodded to wrap up old reviews, or we need a note here about a review that's been abandoned by its reviewer. Checking one or two and leaving a brief note if there's been no activity

750: 125: 944:

and uses appropriate images that have good captions and comply with WP's policies on images. Many thanks for the work you've put into this, and for your prompt response to my comments - it's been a pleasure working with you.

102: 1228:

I am aware that the free license only concerns copyright, and I reserve the option to take action against anyone who uses this work in a libelous way, or in violation of personality rights, trademark restrictions, etc.

1224:

I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me.

1220:

I acknowledge that I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product, and to modify it according to their needs, as long as they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

816:

How to identify specific broke DOIs, without checking every source. Possible causes: WP editors error; DOI system error; WP DOI template error; any other? How to fix? What it can't be fixed quickly?

842:

any that are unresolved when most others are done, and strike out any of comments that I later decide are mistaken. I'll sign each of my comments, so we can see who said what - please do the same.

745: 772:

for several weeks takes only a couple of minutes. Similarly, sometimes old second-opinion requests can be resolved quickly, without requiring a significant commitment.

1018: 595:| title=IGN Presents the History of Warcraft – War with Westwood | last=Fahs |first=Travis | date=August 18, 2009 | publisher=IGN | accessdate=5 Feb 2010 |ref= 239: 768: 761: 489: 107: 755: 369: 325: 1024: 359: 204: 1380: 1360: 1340: 1320: 1300: 1280: 1260: 384: 364: 320: 315: 346: 341: 379: 354: 335: 776: 419: 389: 374: 260: 250: 199: 1003: 404: 330: 1232:

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the work may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

948:

If you've got 2 or more articles through GA reviewers, please try to review as many articles as you have nominated for GA review.

425: 305: 300: 194: 189: 1060:{{subst:DYKproblem|Article|header=yes|sig=yes}} on the nominator's talk page, in case they do not notice that there is an issue. 394: 430: 435: 399: 310: 295: 285: 280: 275: 265: 245: 229: 166:: more contrast; "brackets" for the "A" and "B" sections; citation(s);make annotated image (template); tell original creator. 214: 414: 234: 1008: 255: 409: 219: 290: 270: 224: 209: 903: 936:: it provides good coverage, is neutral and well-referenced, is clearly-written, complies with the parts of 113: 779:. Sometimes the issues are simple, so five minutes' work provides a significant benefit to the nominator. 1191:

Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

119: 1165: 1136: 1115:

Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith

986: 982: 855:

when I'm working on it, as edit conflicts are frustrating. If you think I've forgotten to remove

1213:

I hereby assert that I am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the work .

634: 606: 573: 538: 95: 1039: 959: 941: 933: 792: 788: 764:

every now and again to see what's happening (if anything) with some of the oldest reviews.

647: 619: 582: 547: 869: 859: 849: 175: 1103: 658: 592: 558: 523: 978: 974: 937: 784: 716: 693: 1150: 1030: 91: 17: 1179: 907: 751:

Knowledge:WikiProject Good articles/GAN backlog elimination drives/December 2011

147: 1250: 1248: 1246: 1244: 1242: 1085: 108:

Wikipedia_talk:Good_article_reassessment#GAs_with_five_or_more_intro_paragraphs

1121: 1012: 163: 1133:

DYK eligibility requires that an issue be addressed. Notify nominator with

926:

I review the lead last, to check that all of it is based on the main text.

126:

Knowledge:Good article reassessment/Master of Orion II: Battle at Antares/1

998: 103:

Knowledge:WikiProject_Video_games/Reference_library/Online_print_archive#W

169: 804:

Sign on to an articles before working on it, to avoid duplication, etc.

31: 1379: