1159:
contentious changes or additions, and to also welcome and embrace all users to provide input. It is obvious that everybody is very passionate about the topic, and I hope the request for behavior modification is not misinterpreted by
Worldedixor as not appreciating any of his or her good faith efforts to provide content to the encyclopedia. Sometimes it helps provide fresh perspective to just work on articles on a completely different topic for a few days. Constructive criticism is often provided to great users who have the ability to become even greater.
801:. I move to dismiss the Rfc in its entirety, on many grounds, but the most damaging to me was the willful contamination of the editors pool by a vindictive Technophant's violating canvassing guidelines, and destroying the "objectivity" of the process, makimg it biased against me. Here is the mountain of verifiable evidence of Technophant's misconduct, in bad faith, and in the form of multiple canvassing edits
1032:
979:, why from the end of July through to earlier this month you have apparently taken every opportunity to mount a personal attack on me on the ISIS Talk page, even once when I was absent from the discussion, and despite my numerous attempts to resolve our differences? I have found the harassment almost intolerable and have never personally been treated like this in Knowledge (XXG) before.
1103:, this is not the place to ask that the RfC be dismissed. RfCs have their own processes, and this isn't really one of them. I'm not addressing the merits of your complaint because of the procedural issues. I hope that makes sense to you. I would offer one piece of friendly advice, though, and that is not to get so upset about these things. Nothing's actually
763:{Anyone is welcome to endorse this or any other view, but do not change other people's views. RFC/U does not accept "opposes" or "anti-endorsements"; the fact that you do not endorse a view indicates that you do not entirely agree with it. Discussion of this view or other people's endorsements belongs on the talk page, not in this section.}
351:) Hostile attack, with boldface "shouting", against another editor for reverting an item that was not supported by the reference, on the basis that a clause in Israeli law, not mentioned in the reference or on the page, bridged the gap between the reference's text and the item. Claimed to base the attack on
1125:: As I said earlier, unless this tragedy of justice is closed, with an apology, and the (very) small number of people who used it as a pretext to attack me mercilessly are sanctioned, I am no longer interested in contributing to Knowledge (XXG). As a matter of fact, I have not edited in over a month!...
1058:
need the help of an objective, knowledgeable, uninvolved and unbiased admin who truly cares about
Knowledge (XXG) to look at this Rfc objectively and tell Technophant what he or she thinks of his actions, and whether his actions are consistent with policy or not. Also, judge whether this Rfc should
788:
This section is reserved for the use of the user whose conduct is disputed. Users writing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section, and the person writing this section should not write a view below. Anyone is welcome to endorse this or
956:
especially after you contaminated the "objectivity" of the editors pool by violating canvassing guidelines. Also, you don't even care about my GREAT and well sourced "Article" contributions, you just follow me around, hound me, challenge my every edit and make it very unpleasant to edit
Knowledge
63:
user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 12:08, 11 September 2014 (UTC)),
1083:
every time I make a well sourced contribution to
Knowledge (XXG) and/or ask or respond to questions. He is conveniently not answering my questions on this Rfc, and seems to be getting away with repeated policy violations, that no on else, including me, have done or can get away with. He is using
845:
The honest truth of the matter, that
Technophant purposefully left out above in bad faith, thereby shattering his credibility and the credibility of this Rfc, was that it was Technophant who was following me around just to hound me and harass me in a matter that did not even involve him. It was
1158:
I have made some contributions to the topics and believe that
Worldedixor, Technophant, and P123ct1 have all made some great contributions. That being said, the topic is very contentious, and I believe it is more productive to have civil discussion on the Talk page of the article, prior to any
592:
My first attempt to contact this user on his talk page was reverted without comment. I was confused, and also thought that the account was possibly hijacked, which led to me reposting the reverted comments. This led the user to escalate and make a complaint with an admin
272:
Talk page (more than any other editor), despite many attempts by P123ct1 to resolve disagreements and reconcile differences on the
Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant Talk page and the user's Talk page (where P123ct1's messages are removed, usually instantly).
1148:
This section is for summaries and opinions written by users who are not directly involved with the dispute, but who would like to share their views of the dispute. Anyone is welcome to endorse any view on this page, but you should not change other people's
878:
RFC/U does not accept "opposes" or "anti-endorsements"; the fact that you do not endorse a view indicates that you do not entirely agree with it. Discussion of this view or comments made by people endorsing this view belong on the talk page, not in this
1084:
this Rfc, which credibility I have many reasons to question (please read below) as a pretext to discourage me from editing
Knowledge (XXG). If his actions are not investigated and controlled, I will absolutely no longer participate in Knowledge (XXG).
199:{Add your summary here. You must use the endorsement section below to sign it. Anyone is welcome to endorse this or any other view, but do not change other people's views. Editors writing this section should not normally add additional views below.}
498:(Provide diffs of the comments. As with anywhere else on this RfC/U, links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)
796:
This Rfc was concocted in bad faith, as I will demonstrate, with one or more policy violations that renders it biased against me. It is currently used as a pretext to instigate, harass, badger and attack me
133:
This is a summary written by users who have initiated the request for comment. It should spell out exactly what the changes they'd like to see in the user, or what questions of behavior should be the focus.
1197:. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.
116:
This is a summary written by users who are concerned by this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.
869:
to continue instigating me relentlessly. He later conveniently "chose" to hide his initial instigation and attack from the talk page (please click on show to see his hidden initial attack).
206:, this user first edited 25 August 2014 and has made 302 comments in 5 weeks. He frequently attacks other users, and seems to be trying to exert ownership of the talk page. In this comment
1038:
1211:
1206:
281:(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)
344:
335:
315:
309:
298:
292:
1194:
103:
52:
210:, Technophant is both attacked, harassed, and told that he should not be allowed to be in the conversation because he wasn't "invited". This is unacceptable (
203:
157:
The editor will agree to stop removing other users' talk page messages from their user talk page. Removed user messages should be put in an archive.
329:
740:
RFC/U does not accept "opposes" or "anti-endorsements"; the fact that you do not endorse a view indicates that you do not entirely agree with it.
352:
241:) and has made for this project to be a hostile work environment. He has also engaged in talk page issues in other articles related to ISIS (ie.
656:, which had no response from user. An accusation of racism was levelled at P123ct1, at a time when P123ct1 had no idea of user's nationality.
141:
The editor will agree to provide high-quality sources whenever s/he adds potentially controversial information to articles on the Arab World.
421:
directed at second certifier on an admin's talk page (several examples of this on same talk page re certifier and re other editors from the
422:
269:
249:
218:
187:
165:
841:, Technophant is both attacked, harassed, and told that he should not be allowed to be in the conversation because he wasn't "invited".
83:
17:
55:, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the
531:
385:
341:
Serious WP:PA where user called in an admin to resolve perceived rule infraction by editor, constituting abuse of Talk page
370:
608:
My most recent attempt to address this user regarding personal attacks on his talk page did get a reply. It can be seen
391:
865:. Instead of acknowledging his mistake (assuming it was a mistake) and apologize in a civil manner, he found another
478:
406:
348:
338:
323:
Response by WE expressing ownership of talk page (you're not invited) and wrongful accusation of personal attack.
1063:
contaminated the "objectivity" of the editors pool by violating canvassing guidelines which prohibit notifying a
398:
uncivil remark ("WHAT DID I DO, JERK? Just go edit... and LEAVE ME ALONE... Stop talking to me and about me...").
23:
392:
Talk:List_of_Lebanese_people#Joyce_Gemayel_is_not_that_notable_to_be_listed.3B_She_is_even_hardly_a_Politician_:
242:
917:
Why are you writing in the areas below? The instructions clearly say you should keep put your response in the
862:
to badger me, and that I was discussing in a civil yet assertive manner with logical arguments. Ref this diff
472:
906:
Any users may post questions in this section. Answers should be reserved for the user named in the dispute.
89:
454:
1164:
1130:
1089:
962:
927:
699:
77:
1168:
1134:
1116:
1093:
996:
966:
932:
776:
721:
704:
631:
Attempt (one of many) to reconcile acknowledged by user, but removed by user from his user/talk page;
802:
597:
217:
This user has also had unresolved disputes with and/or attacked many major recent contributors (to
324:
211:
789:
any other view, but no one except the editor(s) named in the dispute may change the summary here.
980:
632:
484:
442:
414:
402:
364:
261:
176:
37:
1160:
992:
717:
549:
147:
The editor will agree to make a greater effort to comment on the content, not the contributor.
527:
466:
460:
1126:
1100:
1085:
1076:
976:
958:
922:
914:
772:
694:
583:
519:
513:
509:
238:
121:
73:
448:
161:
1112:
1041:
has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the
226:
984:
636:
418:
265:
180:
169:
151:
594:
230:
988:
713:
620:
356:
222:
144:
The editor will use full and proper citations and refrain from inserting bare URLs.
310:
Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant/Archive 9#Use of bold text on talk pages
1047:
template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.
355:, while invoking own ability to read non-English sources. See also exchange with
299:
Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant/Archive 6#Timeline: entry for 29 August
102:
signed comments other than your own view or an endorsement should be directed to
98:
Users should not edit other people's summaries or views, except to endorse them.
793:{Add your summary here. You must use the endorsement section below to sign it.}
768:
643:] Request on user's talk page to stop WP:PA and WP:HOUND directed at P123ct1 on
412:
336:
Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant/Archive 5#Using YouTube for citations
1122:
1108:
523:
234:
1193:
signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to
835:
One example of the many unfounded accusations and half-truths above says:
653:
557:
Multiple attempts by multiple users at the end of his archived talk page
316:
Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant/Archive 4#WP:OWN to new editors
451:(frequent and inappropiate accusations of incompetence, ignorance, etc.)
487:(repeated harassment of an editor in retaliation for perceived slights)
469:(ownership of talk page, using talk page to attack editors or push POV)
463:(not getting the point regarding repeated attempts to correct behavior)
526:
with an expiry time of 1 week for
Disruptive editing: harassment, and
436:{List the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}
293:
Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant/Archive 4#Competence
Matters
948:
like I did when you asked this question. Also, this Rfc reeks of
457:(case building, insults, trying to get users to leave discussions)
644:
409:, although second certifier not present on talk page at the time
186:
The editor will agree to stop airing personal grievances on the
1219:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
575:
Civil request to stop bad behavior removed from W-E's Talk page
1026:
541:
Failing to respond to other editors concerns on user talk page
330:
Talk:James Foley (journalist)/Archive 1#Execution or Murder.3F
1081:
unrelated to the same dispute and that don't even involve him
1079:
is "digging and singling me out" and adding more accusations
301:
harassment, demanding that personal information be revealed.
1212:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/User conduct/Guidance2
940:
Because I am entitled to ask you questions. Please respond
481:(frequently inappropriate accusations of policy violations)
332:
warned about shouting on another page (and the Levant page)
1207:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/User conduct/Guidance
809:" while arguing the case in his first sentence, which has
475:(going from one admin page to another looking for support)
345:
Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant/Archive 8#Israel
846:
Technophant who started attacking me and instigating me,
957:(XXG) even though I barely edit due to my limited time.
202:
Recently there's been multiple issues with this user on
138:
The editor will reform the conduct outlined in this RfC.
64:
the page will be deleted. The current date and time is:
863:
838:
830:
827:
824:
821:
818:
650:
629:
609:
603:
573:
568:
563:
558:
553:
395:
381:
377:
373:
360:
321:
304:
253:
207:
652:
Attempt to reconcile after a serious WP:PA on P123ct1
312:
User takes talk page use suggestion as personal attack
150:
The editor will agree to stop accusing other users of
494:
Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute
36:
The following discussion is an archived record of an
921:
section and keep other discussion on the talk page.~
306:
not accepting criticism, countering with accusations
736:Additional users endorsing this cause for concern.
683:Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute.
647:talk page was removed by user without edit summary
516:with an expiry time of 24 hours for 3RR violation.
190:talk page and distracting editors from their work.
53:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/User conduct
24:User:Technophant/Requests for comment/Worldedixor
1071:. Equally important, this Rfc must involve the
46:No further edits should be made to this page.
369:Removal of other user's talk page comments on
1225:No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
1186:Reminder to use the talk page for discussion
124:'s problematic manner in handling disputes.
678:Users certifying the basis for this dispute
854:, without even bothering to find out that
639:directed at P123ct1 continued despite this
552:regarding MoS ref issues with no comment
425:page). Unwillingness to accept criticism.
268:behaviour at P123ct1 relentlessly on the
204:Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
160:All editors will voluntarily follow the
605:My warning to stop disruptive behavior.
295:Polite request, rude response, civility
405:behavior directed at second certifier
394:Old (Feb 2007) discussion leading to
7:
1039:request for help from administrators
817:the outcome of this Rfc against me.
758:Other users who endorse this summary
423:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
270:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
250:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
219:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
188:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
166:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment
987:are the relevant policies here. --
522:was blocked on 27 October 2013 by
512:was blocked on 24 October 2013 by
432:Applicable policies and guidelines
31:
1059:be dismissed because Technophant
1030:
248:Since an edit by P123ct1 to the
38:user conduct request for comment
1174:Users who endorse this summary:
1075:single dispute. Unfortunately,
873:Users who endorse this summary:
858:who made the edit he used as a
120:The heart of this complaint is
1169:12:57, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
1117:13:15, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
1094:01:06, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
997:16:44, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
967:04:21, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
933:03:41, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
777:22:41, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
722:09:50, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
705:07:39, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
175:The editor will agree to stop
66:00:25, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
1:
918:
371:Talk:James Foley (journalist)
353:WP:Revert only when necessary
277:Evidence of disputed behavior
260:2014, this user has directed
1154:Outside view by MeropeRiddle
1135:22:10, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
384:that were discussed at AN/I
1195:this page's discussion page
104:this page's discussion page
1242:
318:warnings to other editors
1222:Please do not modify it.
805:with the express title "
285:Article talk page abuses
243:James Foley (journalist)
111:Statement of the dispute
43:Please do not modify it.
1065:chosen group of editors
901:Questions to named user
807:RFC/U for user problems
619:Attempts by certifier
582:Attempts by certifier
445:(obvious and repeated)
183:on particular editors.
179:and repeatedly making
162:Bold, revert, discuss
154:or other violations.
51:To remain listed at
548:Removed request by
359:at end of section (
946:in a timely manner
856:it was not even me
1107:yet. Take care.--
1096:
1051:
1050:
931:
703:
550:User:BullRangifer
22:(Redirected from
1233:
1224:
1143:Additional views
1053:
1045:
1034:
1033:
1027:
925:
837:In this comment
799:on a daily basis
697:
565:more accusations
520:User:Worldedixor
510:User:Worldedixor
479:WP:Wikilawyering
239:User:Technophant
181:personal attacks
67:
45:
27:
1241:
1240:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1220:
1203:
1188:
1156:
1145:
1043:
1031:
903:
875:
813:influenced and
785:
760:
680:
665:
624:
587:
543:
532:AN/I discussion
504:
502:Previous blocks
496:
434:
287:
279:
227:User:Dougweller
197:
130:
128:Desired outcome
113:
65:
59:dispute with a
41:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1239:
1237:
1228:
1227:
1215:
1214:
1209:
1202:
1199:
1187:
1184:
1182:
1180:
1179:
1155:
1152:
1144:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1049:
1048:
1044:{{admin help}}
1035:
1024:
1021:
1018:
1015:
1012:
1009:
1006:
971:
902:
899:
897:
895:
894:
892:
890:
888:
886:
884:
874:
871:
784:
781:
780:
779:
759:
756:
754:
752:
751:
750:
749:
747:
738:
733:
732:
731:
730:
728:
726:
724:
707:
679:
676:
675:
674:
673:
672:
670:
664:
663:Other attempts
661:
660:
659:
658:
657:
648:
640:
623:
617:
616:
615:
614:
613:
606:
601:
586:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
571:
566:
561:
555:
542:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
517:
503:
500:
495:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
482:
476:
473:WP:OTHERPARENT
470:
464:
458:
452:
446:
433:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
410:
399:
389:
367:
342:
333:
327:
319:
313:
307:
302:
296:
286:
283:
278:
275:
196:
193:
192:
191:
184:
173:
158:
155:
148:
145:
142:
139:
129:
126:
112:
109:
95:
94:
93:
70:
49:
48:
32:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1238:
1226:
1223:
1217:
1216:
1213:
1210:
1208:
1205:
1204:
1200:
1198:
1196:
1192:
1185:
1183:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1171:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1153:
1151:
1150:
1142:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1069:may be biased
1066:
1062:
1057:
1046:
1040:
1036:
1029:
1028:
1025:
1022:
1019:
1016:
1013:
1010:
1007:
1004:
1003:
999:
998:
994:
990:
986:
982:
978:
974:
969:
968:
964:
960:
955:
954:flagrant bias
951:
947:
943:
939:
935:
934:
929:
924:
920:
916:
912:
908:
907:
900:
898:
893:
891:
889:
887:
885:
883:
882:
881:
880:
872:
870:
868:
864:
861:
857:
853:
849:
843:
842:
840:
833:
831:
828:
825:
822:
819:
816:
812:
808:
804:
800:
794:
791:
790:
782:
778:
774:
770:
767:
766:
765:
764:
757:
755:
748:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
737:
729:
727:
725:
723:
719:
715:
711:
708:
706:
701:
696:
692:
689:
688:
687:
686:
685:
684:
677:
671:
669:
668:
667:
666:
662:
655:
651:
649:
646:
642:
641:
638:
634:
630:
628:
627:
626:
625:
622:
618:
611:
607:
604:
602:
599:
596:
591:
590:
589:
588:
585:
581:
574:
572:
570:more warnings
569:
567:
564:
562:
560:
556:
554:
551:
547:
546:
545:
544:
540:
533:
529:
525:
521:
518:
515:
511:
508:
507:
506:
505:
501:
499:
493:
486:
483:
480:
477:
474:
471:
468:
465:
462:
459:
456:
455:WP:HARASSMENT
453:
450:
447:
444:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
431:
424:
420:
416:
413:
411:
408:
404:
400:
397:
393:
390:
387:
383:
379:
375:
372:
368:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
343:
340:
337:
334:
331:
328:
326:
322:
320:
317:
314:
311:
308:
305:
303:
300:
297:
294:
291:
290:
289:
288:
284:
282:
276:
274:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
246:
244:
240:
236:
232:
231:User:Gazkthul
228:
224:
220:
215:
213:
209:
205:
200:
194:
189:
185:
182:
178:
174:
171:
167:
163:
159:
156:
153:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
136:
135:
134:
127:
125:
123:
118:
117:
110:
108:
107:
105:
101:
91:
88:
85:
82:
79:
75:
72:
71:
69:
62:
58:
54:
47:
44:
39:
34:
33:
25:
19:
1221:
1218:
1190:
1189:
1181:
1173:
1172:
1161:MeropeRiddle
1157:
1147:
1146:
1104:
1080:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1055:
1052:
1042:
1023:
1020:
1017:
1014:
1011:
1008:
1005:
1001:
1000:
972:
970:
953:
949:
945:
942:responsively
941:
937:
936:
910:
909:
905:
904:
896:
877:
876:
866:
859:
855:
851:
847:
844:
836:
834:
814:
810:
806:
798:
795:
792:
787:
786:
762:
761:
753:
739:
735:
734:
709:
690:
682:
681:
497:
435:
401:Example of
280:
257:
247:
223:User:P123ct1
216:
201:
198:
177:Wikihounding
170:edit warring
132:
131:
119:
115:
114:
99:
97:
96:
86:
80:
60:
56:
50:
42:
35:
1127:Worldedixor
1101:Worldedixor
1086:Worldedixor
1077:Technophant
977:Worldedixor
975:May I ask,
959:Worldedixor
923:Technophant
915:Worldedixor
695:Technophant
584:Technophant
514:Mark Arsten
221:including (
195:Description
122:Worldedixor
74:Worldedixor
852:unprovoked
803:WP:CANVASS
235:User:Ericl
168:to reduce
164:system in
950:bad faith
919:#Response
848:uninvited
595:Adjwilley
325:WP:NOEDIT
212:WP:NOEDIT
1201:See also
1105:happened
1056:urgently
981:WP:HOUND
783:Response
633:WP:HOUND
485:WP:HOUND
443:WP:CIVIL
415:WP:HOUND
403:WP:HOUND
365:WP:CIVIL
262:WP:HOUND
252:article
84:contribs
1061:already
989:P123ct1
879:section
867:pretext
860:pretext
811:already
714:P123ct1
710:Endorse
691:Endorse
621:P123ct1
528:WP:IDHT
467:WP:TALK
461:WP:IDHT
357:P123ct1
1149:views.
815:biased
769:Thnidu
449:WP:NPA
380:, and
256:on 25
61:single
1123:Bbb23
1109:Bbb23
1037:This
985:WP:PA
832:? }
637:WP:PA
524:Bbb23
419:WP:PA
266:WP:PA
152:WP:PA
16:<
1165:talk
1131:talk
1113:talk
1090:talk
1073:same
1067:who
993:talk
983:and
963:talk
952:and
944:and
928:talk
850:and
839:here
773:talk
718:talk
700:talk
654:here
645:ISIS
635:and
610:here
598:here
559:here
417:and
407:here
396:this
386:here
382:here
378:here
374:here
361:diff
264:and
258:July
254:here
237:and
208:here
90:logs
78:talk
57:same
1191:All
829:,
823:,
363:).
245:).
214:).
100:All
1167:)
1133:)
1115:)
1092:)
1054:I
1002:A.
995:)
973:Q.
965:)
938:A.
911:Q.
826:,
820:,
775:)
720:)
712:--
530:.
376:,
233:,
229:,
225:,
68:.
40:.
1163:(
1129:(
1121:@
1111:(
1088:(
991:(
961:(
930:)
926:(
913:@
771:(
716:(
702:)
698:(
693:~
612:.
600:.
534:.
388:.
349:.
347:(
339:.
172:.
106:.
92:)
87:·
81:·
76:(
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.