112:
editors temporarily or permanently, as well as impose various types of editing lock-outs upon individual articles. Similarly, when Menand writes that Wales "doesn't care whether some of the editors are discovered to be impostors", this elides the fact that "pretending to expertise" is only one kind of imposture. One way for an editor to get booted and their contributions deleted is to be
108:, and even many peer-reviewed journal articles would not make the cut, as Knowledge (XXG) values review articles that summarize and contextualize over initial reports that might not hold up. Menand is correct to say that Knowledge (XXG) functions as "in essence, an aggregator site", but long experience has taught its community that there need to be standards for what is aggregated.
31:
119:
The "neoliberalism applied to knowledge" bit is a nifty turn of phrase, but after all decentralized communities of letters long predated Hayek, and one could just as well say that the
Knowledge (XXG) project provides knowledge "from each according to their ability"; perhaps the jargon of economics is
111:
Menand describes Jimmy Wales as the project's "grand arbiter", but the vast majority of day-to-day decisions about when editors get the boot are made by the volunteers themselves. Community members who successfully run a gauntlet of a nomination process become "administrators", who can then block
100:", 23 November 2020) misrepresents Knowledge (XXG) in a few ways. When it comes to citations, peer-reviewed journals and blogs are not treated the same. Blog posts, social media and other self-published sources can only be used
76:
Finished writing a draft article? Are you ready to request review of it by an experienced editor for possible inclusion in
Knowledge (XXG)?
218:
97:
70:
49:
17:
105:
44:
199:
160:
191:
113:
101:
40:
66:
223:
203:
164:
125:
I think this was a letter I wrote to the New Yorker and never got a reply to?
52:. It serves as a testing spot and page development space for the user and is
219:"Prof. E. McSquared's Calculus Primer: Expanded Intergalactic Version!"
179:
148:
195:
25:
79:
59:
98:
Knowledge (XXG), “Jeopardy!,” and the Fate of the Fact
8:
48:. A user sandbox is a subpage of the user's
120:more catchy here than it is illuminating.
140:
106:virtually never be an acceptable source
96:Louis Menand's entertaining column ("
7:
136:Prof. E. McSquared's Calculus Primer
104:. In medical matters, a blog would
24:
153:The American Mathematical Monthly
58:Create or edit your own sandbox
29:
1:
81:Submit your draft for review!
217:Schulte, Tom (2015-07-21).
102:in restricted circumstances
54:not an encyclopedia article
251:
178:Campbell, Paul J. (1990).
114:unmasked as a paid shill
159:(10): 959–964. 1989.
149:"Telegraphic Reviews"
184:Mathematics Magazine
18:User:XOR'easter
89:
88:
65:Other sandboxes:
63:
242:
235:
234:
232:
231:
214:
208:
207:
175:
169:
168:
145:
85:
84:
82:
71:Template sandbox
57:
33:
32:
26:
250:
249:
245:
244:
243:
241:
240:
239:
238:
229:
227:
216:
215:
211:
196:10.2307/2691516
177:
176:
172:
147:
146:
142:
133:
94:
80:
78:
77:
75:
74:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
248:
246:
237:
236:
209:
170:
139:
132:
129:
128:
127:
93:
90:
87:
86:
55:
45:XOR'easter
36:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
247:
226:
225:
220:
213:
210:
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
181:
174:
171:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
144:
141:
138:
137:
130:
126:
123:
122:
121:
117:
115:
109:
107:
103:
99:
91:
83:
73:
72:
68:
61:
53:
51:
47:
46:
42:
35:
28:
27:
19:
228:. Retrieved
222:
212:
190:(1): 64–68.
187:
183:
173:
156:
152:
143:
135:
134:
124:
118:
110:
95:
67:Main sandbox
64:
38:
224:MAA Reviews
230:2024-09-08
131:References
204:0025-570X
180:"Reviews"
165:0002-9890
50:user page
39:the user
37:This is
69:|
41:sandbox
202:
163:
92:Menand
16:<
200:ISSN
161:ISSN
60:here
192:doi
43:of
221:.
198:.
188:63
186:.
182:.
157:96
155:.
151:.
116:.
56:.
233:.
206:.
194::
167:.
62:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.