204:
109:
417:
that needs work everyone can edit
Knowledge but they need scholarly citations to do so unpopular airtcles doesn't get that much attention or people with less knowledge about that airtcle too only most popular airtcles gets noticed this the reason why people think Knowledge is unreliable however most
361:
He was saying that
Knowledge supports casteism because Knowledge says that it's a interpretation and that shambaku is a fictionary character it's politically biased and itself stupid to say Knowledge is biased when many scholars agree that shambaku was a fictional character
455:
These type of users makes
Knowledge like a bad place Knowledge has been said to be hindu phobic by neo hindus like or some conspiracy channels like string when Knowledge is biased towards Hinduism in the Hinduism and other religions airtcle
435:
Indeed. Quality and coverage of subjects will depend on the number of people interested. And yes, Knowledge is actually more reliable than some are willing to give credit. As you said, it is possible to glean this from reading the citations.
248:
241:
233:
229:
418:
of them don't know how to check citations or how to check if that source is scholarly if i wanted a scholary work i would get a book by a scholar or from Google scholar
256:
390:
However, as with all reference works, Knowledge is not considered to be a reliable source as not everything in
Knowledge is accurate, comprehensive, or unbiased
26:
25:
43:! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Knowledge and get help from experienced editors like
259:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
385:
133:
125:
328:
252:
145:
140:
for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --
288:
414:
113:
237:
141:
73:
50:
137:
312:
129:
443:
403:
338:
302:
117:
347:
Ok sure but i got angry because he was saying some stupid stuff like
Knowledge supports casteism
457:
419:
379:
363:
348:
183:
169:
155:
89:
57:
40:
413:
The
References in the interpolation section are scholary works there are biased airtcles like
393:
324:
210:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.
269:
437:
397:
332:
296:
225:
121:
203:
284:
221:
182:
And that wasn't really rm considering i did it on a mistake not intensionally tho
228:. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
320:
292:
265:
108:
316:
45:
396:(i.e., fix it yourself), and use talk pages to surface discussions.
465:
447:
427:
407:
371:
356:
342:
306:
273:
191:
177:
163:
149:
97:
216:
imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
68:
112:
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
154:
Should have been used POV Nonsense Or Bias
Nonsense for tte
124:. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
136:. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
295:is unencyclopaedic and against common courtesy.
134:contributing constructively to this encyclopedia
132:which also provides further information about
128:. You can find information about these at our
8:
247:For additional information, please see the
232:is in effect. Any administrator may impose
120:, did not appear constructive and has been
244:, when making edits related to the topic.
323:). In which case I suggest referring to
37:! Thanks for contributing to Knowledge.
17:950CMR, you are invited to the Teahouse!
236:on editors who do not strictly follow
7:
386:Knowledge:Researching with Knowledge
384:I understand it can be frustrating.
249:guidance on discretionary sanctions
283:With reference to your comment on
14:
311:I've deduced that you hold some
202:
107:
24:
329:Knowledge:Neutral point of view
116:, such as the edit you made to
1:
289:Knowledge:No personal attacks
274:22:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
415:Hinduism and other religions
192:14:30, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
178:14:28, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
164:14:28, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
150:14:13, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
55:
220:You have shown interest in
98:16:42, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
79:16:03, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
481:
279:Use of impolite vernacular
242:page-specific restrictions
63:We hope to see you there!
22:
466:22:13, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
448:22:10, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
428:20:35, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
408:18:34, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
372:04:23, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
357:03:34, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
343:03:08, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
307:02:52, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
114:your recent contributions
461:
423:
367:
352:
287:, please have a read of
187:
173:
159:
93:
253:Arbitration Committee's
230:discretionary sanctions
168:For the edit summary *
126:policies and guidelines
142:John Maynard Friedman
315:opinions (e.g., re:
238:Knowledge's policies
118:Talk:Bharata Khanda
388:has some advice: "
58:Visit the Teahouse
394:Knowledge:Be bold
325:Knowledge:Purpose
313:anti-intellectual
86:
85:
80:
76:
72:on behalf of the
472:
446:
406:
383:
341:
305:
206:
111:
78:
71:
65:
60:
48:
39:Be our guest at
28:
21:
20:
480:
479:
475:
474:
473:
471:
470:
469:
442:
402:
377:
337:
301:
281:
262:
261:
207:
199:
197:Sanctions alert
105:
82:
81:
67:
61:
56:
44:
19:
12:
11:
5:
478:
476:
453:
452:
451:
450:
440:
411:
410:
400:
392:." Generally,
335:
299:
280:
277:
226:fringe science
208:
201:
200:
198:
195:
104:
101:
84:
83:
74:Teahouse hosts
62:
46:Cordless Larry
38:
31:
29:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
477:
468:
467:
463:
459:
449:
445:
441:
438:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
425:
421:
416:
409:
405:
401:
398:
395:
391:
387:
381:
376:
375:
374:
373:
369:
365:
359:
358:
354:
350:
345:
344:
340:
336:
333:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
309:
308:
304:
300:
297:
294:
291:. The use of
290:
286:
285:Talk:Shambuka
278:
276:
275:
271:
267:
260:
258:
254:
250:
245:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
222:pseudoscience
218:
217:
215:
205:
196:
194:
193:
189:
185:
180:
179:
175:
171:
166:
165:
161:
157:
152:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
110:
102:
100:
99:
95:
91:
88:Thanks larry
77:
75:
70:
66:Delivered by
59:
54:
52:
47:
42:
36:
30:
27:
23:
16:
454:
412:
389:
360:
346:
310:
282:
263:
246:
219:
213:
211:
209:
181:
167:
153:
130:welcome page
106:
103:January 2021
87:
64:
41:the Teahouse
34:
32:
293:pejoratives
321:liberalism
255:decision
240:, or the
234:sanctions
317:Brahmins
251:and the
212:It does
122:reverted
439:Avindra
399:Avindra
334:Avindra
298:Avindra
138:sandbox
69:HostBot
458:950CMR
420:950CMR
380:950CMR
364:950CMR
349:950CMR
184:950CMR
170:950CMR
156:950CMR
90:950CMR
35:950CMR
266:RexxS
462:talk
444:talk
424:talk
404:talk
368:talk
353:talk
339:talk
327:and
319:and
303:talk
270:talk
257:here
224:and
188:talk
174:talk
160:talk
146:talk
94:talk
51:talk
214:not
53:).
33:Hi
464:)
426:)
370:)
355:)
331:.
272:)
264:--
190:)
176:)
162:)
148:)
96:)
460:(
422:(
382::
378:@
366:(
351:(
268:(
186:(
172:(
158:(
144:(
92:(
49:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
