Knowledge

User talk:28bytes/Archive 41

Source šŸ“

1689:
actually be true. All of us truly believe in the work Knowledge is doing, and we want to be a part of this project because we value the work Knowledge is doing. We view ourselves as fellow contributors to Knowledge, and the entire goal of our project is to ensure that we contribute, above all else, neutral, accurate, and comprehensive content. We think the fundamentally unethical actions of people like Wiki-PR have the potential to do serious damage to Knowledge's credibility and thus its utility. Knowledge is an awesome resource, and we want to see it stay awesome. We want to help make it more awesome. One aspect of the work we'll do here will be stuff like neutrally documenting corporations, which we think will improve the encyclopedia because most examinations of corporate articles shows that they are often wrong or non-existent. Even if you don't like corporations, they are definitely encyclopedic topics, and Knowledge will be a better place when 60% of corporation's articles don't have problems. This is only one aspect of our intended work however, but it is the one that we anticipate being the most contentious issue so we think it's a good idea to make the community aware of that first.
1693:
it to be a marketing gimmick; we realize that our presence here will take up the time of some volunteers, and acting as volunteers ourselves in areas that are currently under-served seemed like a way to balance that out to some extent. As stated previously, we all do really believe in Knowledge's project, and the desire to better Knowledge was the catalyst for our decision to make 20% of our work not for profit. Most of our pro-bono work will be aimed at areas that both don't have enough Wikipedian volunteer editors working in them, and where public accessibility of information about them is important. We decided to start off using the Wikiproject Women Scientist tasklist, but as we expand our presence here we are definitely going to branch out in to other under-covered areas as well. We were also thinking about helping out at places like the resource exchange and the help desks where we can. We think that our combination of paid and unpaid work that is all focused towards improving areas that Knowledge lacks good coverage in will eventually result in a better encyclopedia.
1697:
all directly connected accounts - the same reason we link each other from our user page (and use one common article list for all of us, so you can examine all of our collective work in the same place). We have read the policies about meatpuppetry, and except in unusual situations, there will only be one of us engaging on a talk page at a time. The exceptions I can think to that is if someone is off, sick, or otherwise unavailable, or if someone just happens to find a really good source link on a talk page someone else is already engaging on. There will definitely only be one of us ever presenting a viewpoint on a talk page, and since we aim for neutrality, that's not going to be a very strong viewpoint typically. We'd object loudly to a really mean, unfair, and uncited thing someone said about a living person and other such impediments to encyclopedic integrity, but we definitely don't intend to try to fight the community to somehow make our viewpoint win.
1705:
the time to do so, please point us out to it so that we can fix it. We're not perfectly experienced Wikipedians (although we've spent many hours reading policy pages,) and we would really like to become better Wikipedians the longer we stay here. As one last point, we have not yet written any Knowledge pages that we have a conflict of interest for. Not all of us are experienced with the use of Mediawiki (I am more than most, because I have had contracts that have used it,) so we felt it would be better if we started with all volunteer work, both so we could practice, and so we could address any community concerns that come up. All of our articles will be clearly marked as COI or non COI on our userpages, and COI articles will also have disclaimers on talk pages and edit summaries. If you have any questions about what we do or concerns, please feel free to reach out to us.
1701:
could seem like we're trying to just link our site? If not, once it's up, I'll be back with links. If it would, we'll port the same posts to Knowledge so we can just give people links to Knowledge user subpages that explain our practices. I would also like to say that all three of us are really hoping that we will be able to function productively like we think we will be able to here, but if that turns out not to be the case, we will not turn into problematic users like Wiki-PR did. We believe this is the only ethical and effective way we can do this, and if it turns out not to work, we will regret it, but none of us are willing to throw away our personal ethics (not to mention the code of ethics of the PR profession) to make a quick buck.
1983: 536: 1744:
way. Looking at the source, it seems to me to meet Knowledge's standards for reliability, but I could very easily have missed a nuance. One of us will work on the article more within the next several days, and introduce more sources that should further establish her notability. We will also try to avoid writing articles, whether or not we have a conflict of interest regarding the subject, that rely so heavily on a single source in the future.
31: 125: 1681:
We have been following the paid editing situation on Knowledge since about the time the story about Roger Bamkin's work with the government of Gibraltar broke and evaluating how best we could effectively fit in to the wiki-ecosystem, and we think we've come up with a way that will work for everyone involved. I'm sure we'll be making plenty of refinements to our model, but I think our base idea will work well for all involved.
1600:
likely be positive if they work in the same office) and (2) the way they present what they is potentially promotional (i.e., they suggest one can contact them for paid work). The reason I contacted you is because I believe you are among the best at giving advice. My question is whether you think these are issues the community should discuss now or would it be better to watch how the behavior of this group unfolds over time?
1754:
the auspices of the University of California. If you click around some of other pages of CWP it goes in to more detail about these things; I would quote what they say here, but they would be pretty long quotes and would make this post unwieldy. If you have the time, could you explain why you believe the source is unreliable, so we can improve in the future? Thank you for your feedback, we really do appreciate it.
675: 1778: 1354: 1195: 1124: 1086: 1017: 1700:
We have some more detailed statements up on our blog about our intended practices, but our web host is not being very happy today, and I'm also not sure how people would feel about us linking our actual site here. Does linking blog posts that describe our intended code of ethics bother you, since it
1599:
I don't know of anyone who is an expert on paid editors. It's probably too soon to determine conflicts of interest. As of now, my concerns are (1) although paid editing is allowed is it acceptable to work in ways effectively indistinguishable from meatpuppets or perhaps sockpuppets (checkuser would
1753:
What led Shelly to believe the source was reliable initially, and why my first inclination was to think it is reliable too, is that the source has editorial oversight from people who are experts in their field, had full time staff at the time the article was put up, and is published explicitly under
1704:
I understand that my initial words won't do much in terms of calming your worries, or reducing scrutiny of our edits. All we would ask is that you see how we behave before judging us one way or another. I am sure we will make errors. If we make an error and you notice it and you feel like you have
1696:
As to the question as whether we'd show up as puppets if someone ran a scan on us - we probably we would. We don't always work from the same spot, since we often work from coffee shops and other open wifi networks. We put HPR next to our names with the hopes that it would make it clear that we are
1622:
I'm glad you have found my advice helpful! There have been some fairly well-attended discussions on the topic of paid editing in the past, but I suppose another discussion could be beneficial if it was structured well. One thing I would be cautious about is taking any action that would inadvertently
1692:
If either of you are worried that our statement about pro-bono work is meant to lure in more business for us, please let us know if you can think of some wording changes that would make it worry you less. We will try to refine it some ourselves to be more palatable to you as well. We don't intend
1688:
story for quite a while before the Daily Dot covered it - their actions were one of the motivators for us to finally go ahead with this project. Our own research suggests that Wiki-PR's claim of having created twelve thousand articles without a single one of them being transparent or ethical could
1680:
Hi all - Shelly alerted me to this conversation, sorry for joining it a couple days late. When we started this idea, we knew we would receive a lot of scrutiny in how we conducted ourselves. We think that we'll still be able to conduct valuable work here while being transparent in our practices.
1576:
Hi there. Unfortunately, I am not much of an expert on paid editors, so I'm not sure I would be able to be much help here. I do know that paid editing is allowed, although many editors would prefer it not be, for I think quite understandable reasons. If there are specific article edits that concern
1654:
The transparency is a good thing and very rare in paid editing. I think it would be best to wait and see what happens. What I'm worried about is that they are opening up a business on Knowledge with the best possible advertising you could have. In particular, this statement is on all their user
1480:
Observing this comment compels me to answer your question as no, it is not okay. The reason is that firstly, it is against policy to have an unsubstituted template as part of your custom signature. In fact, if you add the template into the preferences signature block, it will automatically convert
714:
Hi - I work for the Harris County Institute of Forensic Science. I performed a quick search today and founds that a page for my agency exists on Knowledge, but has inaccurate information. I would like to know how to go about protecting our page so that we can manage and protect the content and its
1743:
Hi I am One of Many - I went ahead and changed the text on our userpages in a way that should make it seem less promotional; we definitely were not intending it to be taken that way, but see the ambiguity. Hopefully the language I put in is more clear and less likely to come off in a promotional
1627:
article, we can give the edits some extra scrutiny, whereas if Bob chooses to edit as "User:Bob131072" it's not so obvious what's going on. Yet the username policy encourages editors to pick the latter type of username. It's tricky; we don't want to end up punishing people for their honesty, but
1560:
and the related accounts are on the user page. They are, I believe, paid editors working together on articles as they declare. I realize that this is allowed on Knowledge, but do you think this needs broader discussion? Whether intended or not, they appear to be promoting their business.
1494:
which is more character bytes than policy allows for comprising a signature. There are other problems too, but you can achieve the exact signature that this code renders, using less code and bringing it into conformance, until then however, what you have shown is problematic.
806:
Hallo 28bytes! My name is Frid (or Farid), and I am writing to you from the sunny city of Baku! I really need your help - You could create an article - I'm a very bad know English - to create an article about MODELS by named Ricki Hall. If you help me I will be very happy!
1233:
It seems way too early to close the discussion because there is no consensus. What is supposed to happen now, open another discussion? It is obvious that the page should be moved (see the discussion why), but because there's some K-pop fans out there thinking that the
595:
I request that my account be deleted with immediate effect, and that all my edits in the past, and past edit histories, be permanently removed from public viewing. Deletion of my account, City of Lukington, would be immensely appreciated.
2033:, TWLā€™s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of 1623:
discourage paid editors from being transparent about it. We have some fairly counterproductive policies and guidelines that do this already, especially in the area of usernames: if we see "User:Bob from Microsoft" editing the
1728:
for almost all of it is not reliable even if posted on a UCLA website. Second, if you could remove the pledge that I quoted above and just say you do pro bono editing, it would reduce the promotional appearance of your user
1176:
and the editor agrees a rename is the best resolution. I think it is rather simple and ask if you will consider expediting the request considering the circumstances and the users agreeable manner. Thank
766:
Hi. I'm new user of Mediaviki. I created some page that used Mediawiki. Can You help me with some thing or show me somebody who can do it? I need some help with upgrading Mediawiki and set option. Thank
1720:
As I see it, two things will ease my mind for the present. First go slow. Too many paid editors working together too fast could lead to unexpected problems. For example, the article you created
639:, you are invited to contribute to a formal Request for Comment on the question of whether Good Articles should appear in the Did You Know? slot in future. Please see the proposal on its subpage 1655:
pages: "Towards that end, we pledge that we will at least one neutral, encyclopedic article that we do not have a conflict of interest for in an area of Knowledge that is currently under-served
2100: 2087: 1969: 2038: 977:
I would really appreciate your help. I've been fine-tuning Israel's Daylight Savings article and I was wondering if you could edit the template on the bottom of the page under "
935:
I am user Nanako from wp:no. I have unified all my accounts. On wp:en exist no user with the same name, but automatic unification does not work here. Can you help me please? --
1659:" . I might come back to you and discuss this some more if there is evidence that they are using their accounts to run and promote their business. Thanks for you advice. 1481:
the template to its substitutable form. When the template is subsequently substituted to the page where you add four tildes, the substituted code will appear as:
1578: 837:
from french wikipedia, contributing since 2009. I've unified all my accounts but, unfortunately, on en.wikipedia.org, there is a user with my user name,
1869:
The last block was for 3 months, and they immediately started vandalizing again after it. No constructive edits. I've given them 6 months this time.
1223: 640: 618: 845:, it looks like this user has never contributed to this wikipedia. Is-it possible to usurp this account in order to be able to unify my login? 1836: 1045: 999: 916: 864: 1685: 1519: 2041:. There's lots of news this month for the Knowledge Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved... 1398:
I added the PC protection due to XKCD-related vandalism, but it appears that is no longer happening, so I have now removed it. Cheers,
1999: 1444: 782:
Hi TraaBBIT. I'm not familiar with the nuts and bolts of installing the MediaWiki software, but a quick Google search tells me that
734: 657: 786:
may have the information you're looking for, with some links to additional resources that might be of assistance. Good luck!
114:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2013: 978: 464: 457: 452: 447: 440: 435: 430: 423: 418: 413: 406: 401: 396: 389: 384: 379: 372: 362: 355: 350: 345: 338: 333: 328: 321: 316: 311: 304: 299: 294: 287: 282: 277: 270: 265: 260: 253: 248: 243: 236: 231: 226: 219: 214: 209: 202: 197: 192: 97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 906: 854: 1864: 1823: 1475: 614: 497: 185: 180: 175: 168: 163: 158: 151: 146: 141: 1261:
How do you mean "early"? The discussion was initiated 7 months ago. No one has commented there for over three weeks.
1734: 1664: 1605: 1566: 38: 1577:
you, approaching the editor directly on their talk page would be a good first step, and if that doesn't help, the
1840: 1796: 476: 1819: 1334: 1338: 1049: 1003: 920: 868: 1725: 682: 1982: 1523: 1377: 1219: 783: 1993: 1436: 636: 610: 517: 2071:
Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY
940: 1759: 1730: 1710: 1660: 1601: 1562: 1288: 1247: 1255: 1906: 2059:
Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??
1500: 1418: 1182: 995: 912: 860: 816: 722: 606: 1342: 936: 726: 2065:
OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges
1852: 1815: 1786:
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can
1388: 768: 730: 653: 1938: 2053:
Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.
1874: 1844: 1227: 1146: 1108: 1069: 986: 902: 850: 834: 772: 482: 535: 1826: 1581:
may be able to help (although I can't vouch for it personally, having not used it.) Good luck,
2104: 1989: 1946: 1928: 1913: 1888: 1633: 1586: 1557: 1538: 1463: 1428: 1403: 1366: 1314: 1266: 1207: 1136: 1098: 1029: 959: 885: 791: 751: 699: 577: 513: 47: 17: 2007: 1755: 1706: 1280: 1239: 1235: 1150: 1112: 1073: 954:; since he's both a steward and bureaucrat he may have some insight as to what is going on. 478: 124: 2077:
WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions
1496: 1178: 877: 559: 2083:
Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration
1561:
Meatpuppetry is a gray area here, but there is certainly the possibility of abuse here.--
847:
I do not know if I'm in the right place or not to put this request so sorry if I'm wrong.
1848: 1721: 1518:
Can you please participate in the Fluorine peer review? It would be good for y...me.
1384: 810:
In other languages ā€‹ā€‹do not have information about him - please! Yours respectfully -
649: 2023: 1870: 838: 811: 686: 551: 674: 2107: 1950: 1942: 1932: 1924: 1917: 1909: 1892: 1884: 1877: 1856: 1806: 1763: 1738: 1714: 1668: 1637: 1629: 1609: 1590: 1582: 1570: 1542: 1534: 1527: 1504: 1467: 1459: 1407: 1399: 1392: 1370: 1362: 1345: 1318: 1310: 1296: 1270: 1262: 1211: 1203: 1186: 1154: 1140: 1132: 1116: 1102: 1094: 1077: 1053: 1033: 1025: 1007: 963: 955: 951: 944: 889: 881: 820: 795: 787: 776: 755: 747: 738: 703: 695: 662: 622: 581: 573: 563: 521: 599:
I hope that this reaches you soon and that you are able to act upon my request.
2003: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1458:
Sorry, I'm not really an expert on signatures. I prefer the plain ones myself.
643:, or on the main DYK talk page. To add the discussion to your watchlist, click 2047:
Sign up to be a Knowledge Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Knowledge Librarian
1309:
No, I don't believe opening another discussion this soon would be productive.
555: 1068:
Hello! Can you please change my username from "Guycn1" to "Guycn1 (unused)"?
880:; if you put in a request there, a bureaucrat will be along to help you out. 1624: 2099:
only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the
1839:
as it belongs to a school and keeps vandalising articles. There have been
1279:
Fine then. But what is supposed to happen now, open another discussion?
1383:
This article is becoming highly frequently edited. Is PC appropriate? --
1172: 480: 982: 989:. Currently, the link pinpoints to an article that was deleted. 483: 118: 25: 1847:
would stop the article being vandalised by this IP Address.
1776: 673: 602:
Yours sincerely, Unknown user (formerly City of Lukington)
1093:. The user "Guycn1" has been renamed to "Guycn1 (unused)". 1783:
Hello, 28bytes. Please check your email; you've got mail!
1202:. The user "PeaTarBoi" has been renamed to "PeterMan844". 685:
a very happy bureaucratship anniversary on behalf of the
1841:
multiple warnings by other contributors, but no response
1788: 1421:, and then made changes. Is my sig okay at the moment? 1217: 842: 644: 1923:
Thank you for the notification; I will comment there.
1724:
is borderline notable mainly because the web citation
1835:
Hello 28bytes, Could you please block the IP address
2095:
Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be
1333:
Sorry to bother you, but could you delete the pages
1628:that's unfortunately something that often happens. 1908:the topic ban imposed upon me on January 5, 2012. 1533:I would, T, but I'm very short on time this week. 1131:. The user "Guycn2" has been renamed to "Guycn1". 1959:Books and Bytes: The Knowledge Library Newsletter 550:Kudos for the thoughtfulness of your proposal at 1173:I had a conversation with a borderline user name 1107:Thank you. Can you change "Guycn2" to "Guycn1"? 1549:Paid editors working transparently on Knowledge 1238:don't apply to them, this process is hindered. 1417:I created my sig, then read the guidelines in 491:This page has archives. Sections older than 8: 689:! BenisonPBaby 13:37, 1 August 2013 (UTC) 533: 1843:. Alternativly, a semi-lock on the page 501:when more than 28 sections are present. 1905:Please be advised that I am appealing 1484:<div class="db-d2lraXBlZGlhdQ": --> 1224:Dancing Queen (Girls' Generation song) 512:Oh boy, farewell, I miss you already, 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 7: 2029:Welcome to the inaugural edition of 1787: 1423: 110:The following discussion is closed. 1831:Can you please block a IP Address. 1657:for every four clients we take on. 876:Hi Patangel. The page you want is 24: 495:may be automatically archived by 1981: 1579:conflict of interest noticeboard 1556:I just came across this account 1352: 1193: 1122: 1084: 1015: 534: 123: 29: 1978:Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013 1454:00:56, 29 September 2013 (UTC) 909:) 20:30, 25 August 2013 (UTC) 857:) 21:30, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 1505:07:47, 30 September 2013 (UTC) 1468:04:16, 30 September 2013 (UTC) 1408:20:34, 26 September 2013 (UTC) 1393:19:54, 26 September 2013 (UTC) 1371:21:08, 23 September 2013 (UTC) 1346:21:02, 23 September 2013 (UTC) 1319:16:50, 24 September 2013 (UTC) 1297:11:27, 24 September 2013 (UTC) 1271:16:30, 23 September 2013 (UTC) 1256:15:37, 23 September 2013 (UTC) 1212:22:28, 16 September 2013 (UTC) 1187:22:20, 16 September 2013 (UTC) 1155:17:00, 16 September 2013 (UTC) 1141:14:39, 16 September 2013 (UTC) 1117:14:29, 16 September 2013 (UTC) 1103:22:50, 15 September 2013 (UTC) 1078:18:55, 15 September 2013 (UTC) 1054:11:50, 12 September 2013 (UTC) 1034:11:17, 12 September 2013 (UTC) 1008:07:34, 12 September 2013 (UTC) 544:What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar 1: 970:Israel, Daylight savings time 964:17:25, 9 September 2013 (UTC) 2108:20:32, 27 October 2013 (UTC) 2075:Announcing WikiProject Open: 2069:News from the library world: 1951:22:38, 21 October 2013 (UTC) 1933:21:36, 21 October 2013 (UTC) 1918:21:19, 21 October 2013 (UTC) 1893:13:44, 10 October 2013 (UTC) 1878:11:02, 10 October 2013 (UTC) 1857:10:46, 10 October 2013 (UTC) 1792:at any time by removing the 1764:23:38, 11 October 2013 (UTC) 1739:04:11, 10 October 2013 (UTC) 1715:00:34, 10 October 2013 (UTC) 979:Daylight saving time in Asia 2057:New subscription donations: 1827:21:37, 9 October 2013 (UTC) 1669:07:26, 7 October 2013 (UTC) 1638:03:38, 7 October 2013 (UTC) 1610:23:03, 6 October 2013 (UTC) 1591:21:59, 6 October 2013 (UTC) 1571:21:38, 6 October 2013 (UTC) 1543:17:42, 6 October 2013 (UTC) 1528:17:37, 6 October 2013 (UTC) 945:05:10, 29 August 2013 (UTC) 890:16:39, 24 August 2013 (UTC) 821:07:56, 14 August 2013 (UTC) 796:20:36, 10 August 2013 (UTC) 777:06:08, 10 August 2013 (UTC) 756:20:33, 10 August 2013 (UTC) 746:Replied on your talk page. 2126: 2051:Knowledge Loves Libraries: 2037:, please add your name to 1220:merger proposal discussion 739:18:59, 2 August 2013 (UTC) 704:15:50, 1 August 2013 (UTC) 663:00:28, 1 August 2013 (UTC) 2081:New ways to get involved: 1937:I've re-listed my appeal 1771: 1684:We've been following the 1335:User:Meeples10/modern.css 784:Manual:Installation guide 623:20:29, 22 July 2013 (UTC) 582:23:30, 13 July 2013 (UTC) 564:17:55, 13 July 2013 (UTC) 540: 2088:Read the full newsletter 1339:User:Meeples10/modern.js 647:. Thank you in advance. 522:07:32, 7 July 2013 (UTC) 112:Please do not modify it. 1378:Star Trek Into Darkness 1781: 678: 498:Lowercase sigmabot III 2039:the subscriber's list 1780: 1488:''' ] '''<big: --> 1236:policies of Knowledge 931:Unified Login: Nanako 827:Unified login request 677: 572:Thank you very much! 42:of past discussions. 1485:{| | | <big: --> 1419:Knowledge:Signatures 898:Thank you very much. 669:Happy Bureaucratship 592:DEAR ADMINISTRATOR, 1901:Appeal notification 718:Thank you! Tricia 1845:Eston Park Academy 1789:remove this notice 1782: 1490:''' ]</big: --> 1228:Mercy (Duffy song) 987:Israel Summer Time 687:Birthday Committee 683:28bytes/Archive 41 679: 113: 2024:Knowledge Library 1865:talk page stalker 1558:User:Shelly (HPR) 1486:] '''<big: --> 1476:talk page stalker 1451: 1450: 1295: 1254: 1167:Greetings 28bytes 998:comment added by 915:comment added by 863:comment added by 742: 725:comment added by 626: 611:City of Lukington 609:comment added by 569: 568: 505: 504: 470: 469: 111: 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 18:User talk:28bytes 2117: 2101:Suggestions page 1985: 1868: 1813: 1811: 1805: 1801: 1795: 1791: 1779: 1731:I am One of Many 1661:I am One of Many 1602:I am One of Many 1563:I am One of Many 1479: 1424: 1360: 1356: 1355: 1291: 1285: 1283: 1250: 1244: 1242: 1201: 1197: 1196: 1175: 1130: 1126: 1125: 1092: 1088: 1087: 1023: 1019: 1018: 1010: 924: 872: 823: 741: 719: 661: 660: 625: 603: 538: 531: 530: 500: 484: 138: 137: 127: 119: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2125: 2124: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2090: 2035:Books and Bytes 2031:Books and Bytes 2028: 2018: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1970:Books and Bytes 1961: 1903: 1862: 1837:194.168.178.130 1833: 1814: 1809: 1803: 1799: 1797:You've got mail 1793: 1785: 1777: 1774: 1772:You've got mail 1551: 1516: 1491:|}</div: --> 1473: 1452: 1447: 1442: 1434: 1416: 1381: 1353: 1351: 1331: 1289: 1281: 1248: 1240: 1231: 1194: 1192: 1171: 1169: 1123: 1121: 1085: 1083: 1066: 1016: 1014: 993: 972: 933: 910: 858: 829: 814: 804: 764: 720: 712: 710:page protection 691: 671: 652: 648: 637:DYK participant 632: 604: 590: 588:URGENT DELETION 529: 510: 496: 485: 479: 132: 116: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2123: 2121: 2092: 2086: 2045:New positions: 2020: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1960: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1902: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1832: 1829: 1816:PantherLeapord 1784: 1775: 1773: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1722:Nancy M. Dowdy 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1594: 1593: 1550: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1515: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1489:|</big: --> 1487:|</big: --> 1449: 1448: 1440: 1432: 1427: 1422: 1415: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1380: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1330: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1274: 1273: 1230: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1168: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1065: 1064:Rename request 1062: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1046:79.179.181.250 1037: 1036: 1000:79.179.181.250 971: 968: 967: 966: 932: 929: 928: 927: 926: 925: 917:82.237.113.190 901:Best regards, 899: 893: 892: 865:82.237.113.190 849:Best regards, 848: 846: 832: 828: 825: 819:comment added 803: 800: 799: 798: 763: 760: 759: 758: 711: 708: 707: 706: 672: 670: 667: 666: 665: 631: 628: 589: 586: 585: 584: 567: 566: 547: 546: 541: 539: 528: 525: 509: 506: 503: 502: 490: 487: 486: 481: 477: 475: 472: 471: 468: 467: 461: 460: 455: 450: 444: 443: 438: 433: 427: 426: 421: 416: 410: 409: 404: 399: 393: 392: 387: 382: 376: 375: 370: 365: 359: 358: 353: 348: 342: 341: 336: 331: 325: 324: 319: 314: 308: 307: 302: 297: 291: 290: 285: 280: 274: 273: 268: 263: 257: 256: 251: 246: 240: 239: 234: 229: 223: 222: 217: 212: 206: 205: 200: 195: 189: 188: 183: 178: 172: 171: 166: 161: 155: 154: 149: 144: 134: 133: 128: 122: 117: 108: 107: 105: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2122: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2091: 2089: 2084: 2082: 2078: 2076: 2072: 2070: 2066: 2064: 2060: 2058: 2054: 2052: 2048: 2046: 2042: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2027: 2025: 2017: 2015: 2012: 2009: 2005: 2001: 1998: 1995: 1991: 1986: 1984: 1979: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1958: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1900: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1883:Thanks Bish! 1882: 1881: 1879: 1876: 1872: 1866: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1830: 1828: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1808: 1798: 1790: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1687: 1682: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1626: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1559: 1554: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1520:98.117.75.177 1513: 1507: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1492: 1482: 1477: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1446: 1443: 1438: 1435: 1430: 1426: 1425: 1420: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1379: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1359: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1329:Delete please 1328: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1298: 1294: 1292: 1284: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1253: 1251: 1243: 1237: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1200: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1174: 1166: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1145:Thank youĀ :) 1144: 1143: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1129: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1091: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1063: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1022: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 990: 988: 984: 980: 975: 969: 965: 961: 957: 953: 949: 948: 947: 946: 942: 938: 930: 922: 918: 914: 908: 904: 900: 897: 896: 895: 894: 891: 887: 883: 879: 875: 874: 873: 870: 866: 862: 856: 852: 844: 841:. But seeing 840: 839:user:Patangel 836: 826: 824: 822: 818: 813: 808: 801: 797: 793: 789: 785: 781: 780: 779: 778: 774: 770: 761: 757: 753: 749: 745: 744: 743: 740: 736: 732: 728: 724: 716: 709: 705: 701: 697: 693: 692: 690: 688: 684: 676: 668: 664: 659: 658:Contributions 655: 651: 646: 642: 638: 634: 633: 629: 627: 624: 620: 616: 612: 608: 600: 597: 593: 587: 583: 579: 575: 571: 570: 565: 561: 557: 553: 549: 548: 545: 542: 537: 532: 527:RfA conundrum 526: 524: 523: 519: 515: 507: 499: 494: 489: 488: 474: 473: 466: 463: 462: 459: 456: 454: 451: 449: 446: 445: 442: 439: 437: 434: 432: 429: 428: 425: 422: 420: 417: 415: 412: 411: 408: 405: 403: 400: 398: 395: 394: 391: 388: 386: 383: 381: 378: 377: 374: 371: 369: 366: 364: 361: 360: 357: 354: 352: 349: 347: 344: 343: 340: 337: 335: 332: 330: 327: 326: 323: 320: 318: 315: 313: 310: 309: 306: 303: 301: 298: 296: 293: 292: 289: 286: 284: 281: 279: 276: 275: 272: 269: 267: 264: 262: 259: 258: 255: 252: 250: 247: 245: 242: 241: 238: 235: 233: 230: 228: 225: 224: 221: 218: 216: 213: 211: 208: 207: 204: 201: 199: 196: 194: 191: 190: 187: 184: 182: 179: 177: 174: 173: 170: 167: 165: 162: 160: 157: 156: 153: 150: 148: 145: 143: 140: 139: 136: 135: 131: 126: 121: 120: 115: 106: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2105:The Interior 2096: 2094: 2093: 2085: 2080: 2079: 2074: 2073: 2068: 2067: 2062: 2061: 2056: 2055: 2050: 2049: 2044: 2043: 2034: 2030: 2021: 2019: 2010: 1996: 1990:TheĀ Interior 1987: 1980: 1977: 1968: 1967: 1941:as advised. 1904: 1834: 1820:My talk page 1703: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1683: 1679: 1656: 1555: 1553:Hi 28bytes, 1552: 1517: 1493: 1483: 1472: 1453: 1439: 1431: 1429:Curiouscrab0 1414:My Signature 1382: 1357: 1332: 1286: 1245: 1232: 1198: 1170: 1127: 1089: 1067: 1020: 994:ā€” Preceding 991: 976: 973: 952:User:MBisanz 934: 911:ā€” Preceding 859:ā€” Preceding 830: 809: 805: 765: 721:ā€” Preceding 717: 713: 680: 635:As a listed 605:ā€” Preceding 601: 598: 594: 591: 543: 514:Gerda Arendt 511: 492: 367: 129: 109: 104: 78: 43: 37: 1756:Jason (HPR) 1707:Jason (HPR) 1282:Raykyogrou0 1241:Raykyogrou0 1044:Thanks!Ā :) 950:Check with 815:ā€”Preceding 802:I need help 715:integrity. 694:Thank you! 36:This is an 2063:New ideas: 2022:Greetings 1824:My CSD log 1514:Hi 4 short 1497:John Cline 1218:About the 1179:John Cline 981:" to link 974:Hi there! 465:Archive 58 458:Archive 57 453:Archive 56 448:Archive 55 441:Archive 54 436:Archive 53 431:Archive 52 424:Archive 51 419:Archive 50 414:Archive 49 407:Archive 48 402:Archive 47 397:Archive 46 390:Archive 45 385:Archive 44 380:Archive 43 373:Archive 42 368:Archive 41 363:Archive 40 356:Archive 39 351:Archive 38 346:Archive 37 339:Archive 36 334:Archive 35 329:Archive 34 322:Archive 33 317:Archive 32 312:Archive 31 305:Archive 30 300:Archive 29 295:Archive 28 288:Archive 27 283:Archive 26 278:Archive 25 271:Archive 24 266:Archive 23 261:Archive 22 254:Archive 21 249:Archive 20 244:Archive 19 237:Archive 18 232:Archive 17 227:Archive 16 220:Archive 15 215:Archive 14 210:Archive 13 203:Archive 12 198:Archive 11 193:Archive 10 98:ArchiveĀ 45 90:ArchiveĀ 43 85:ArchiveĀ 42 79:ArchiveĀ 41 73:ArchiveĀ 40 68:ArchiveĀ 39 60:ArchiveĀ 35 1849:TIGHazard 1812:template. 1625:Microsoft 1385:George Ho 1343:Meeples10 992:Thanks! 937:NanukNors 833:I'm user 727:Retrotric 650:Gilderien 645:this link 186:Archive 9 181:Archive 8 176:Archive 7 169:Archive 6 164:Archive 5 159:Archive 4 152:Archive 3 147:Archive 2 142:Archive 1 2026:members! 2014:contribs 2000:contribs 1871:Bishonen 1495:Cheers.ā€” 1445:contribs 996:unsigned 913:unsigned 903:Patangel 878:WP:USURP 861:unsigned 851:Patangel 835:Patangel 812:Keete 37 769:TraaBBIT 735:contribs 723:unsigned 681:Wishing 619:contribs 607:unsigned 130:Archives 1943:Dolovis 1925:28bytes 1910:Dolovis 1885:28bytes 1686:Wiki-PR 1630:28bytes 1583:28bytes 1535:28bytes 1460:28bytes 1400:28bytes 1363:28bytes 1311:28bytes 1263:28bytes 1204:28bytes 1133:28bytes 1095:28bytes 1026:28bytes 956:28bytes 882:28bytes 817:undated 788:28bytes 748:28bytes 696:28bytes 630:DYK RfC 574:28bytes 39:archive 2097:opt-in 2004:Ocaasi 1729:pages. 1147:Guycn1 1109:Guycn1 1070:Guycn1 983:Israel 831:Hello. 767:You.-- 552:WP:VPR 493:7 days 1226:into 1177:you.ā€” 556:Bbb23 16:< 2103:. -- 2008:talk 1994:talk 1947:talk 1939:here 1929:talk 1914:talk 1889:talk 1875:talk 1853:talk 1760:talk 1735:talk 1726:here 1711:talk 1665:talk 1634:talk 1606:talk 1587:talk 1567:talk 1539:talk 1524:talk 1501:talk 1464:talk 1437:talk 1404:talk 1389:talk 1367:talk 1358:Done 1337:and 1315:talk 1290:Talk 1267:talk 1249:Talk 1208:talk 1199:Done 1183:talk 1151:talk 1137:talk 1128:Done 1113:talk 1099:talk 1090:Done 1074:talk 1050:talk 1030:talk 1021:Done 1004:talk 960:talk 941:talk 921:talk 907:talk 886:talk 869:talk 855:talk 843:this 792:talk 773:talk 762:HELP 752:talk 731:talk 700:talk 654:Chat 641:here 615:talk 578:talk 560:talk 518:talk 508:Miss 2002:), 1988:by 1807:ygm 1802:or 1222:of 985:to 1949:) 1931:) 1916:) 1891:) 1880:. 1873:| 1855:) 1810:}} 1804:{{ 1800:}} 1794:{{ 1762:) 1737:) 1713:) 1667:) 1636:) 1608:) 1589:) 1569:) 1541:) 1526:) 1503:) 1466:) 1406:) 1391:) 1369:) 1361:. 1341:? 1317:) 1269:) 1210:) 1185:) 1153:) 1139:) 1115:) 1101:) 1076:) 1052:) 1032:) 1024:. 1006:) 962:) 943:) 923:) 888:) 871:) 794:) 775:) 754:) 737:) 733:ā€¢ 702:) 621:) 617:ā€¢ 580:) 562:) 554:. 520:) 94:ā†’ 64:ā† 2016:) 2011:Ā· 2006:( 1997:Ā· 1992:( 1945:( 1927:( 1912:( 1887:( 1867:) 1863:( 1851:( 1822:| 1818:| 1758:( 1733:( 1709:( 1663:( 1632:( 1604:( 1585:( 1565:( 1537:( 1522:( 1499:( 1478:) 1474:( 1462:( 1441:| 1433:| 1402:( 1387:( 1365:( 1313:( 1293:) 1287:( 1265:( 1252:) 1246:( 1206:( 1181:( 1149:( 1135:( 1111:( 1097:( 1072:( 1048:( 1028:( 1002:( 958:( 939:( 919:( 905:( 884:( 867:( 853:( 790:( 771:( 750:( 729:( 698:( 656:| 613:( 576:( 558:( 516:( 50:.

Index

User talk:28bytes
archive
current talk page
ArchiveĀ 35
ArchiveĀ 39
ArchiveĀ 40
ArchiveĀ 41
ArchiveĀ 42
ArchiveĀ 43
ArchiveĀ 45

Archive 1
Archive 2
Archive 3
Archive 4
Archive 5
Archive 6
Archive 7
Archive 8
Archive 9
Archive 10
Archive 11
Archive 12
Archive 13
Archive 14
Archive 15
Archive 16
Archive 17
Archive 18
Archive 19

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘