User talk:302ET - Knowledge (XXG)

323:; sources like Amazon.com should be used extremely sparingly and only in certain circumstances. For future reference, if you can't find information that a product exists outside of third-party sellers like Amazon, that's a good indication that that specific product is not notable. You also added unreferenced information to the article, which obviously would have to be removed in order for an article to pass GA. Furthermore I don't understand why you changed all my formatting fixes; it's commonplace to list sources mentioned in the prose in italics. Why did you change this? You're putting this article in article in a very difficult place; your edits make this article ineligible for GA, but if we get into a dispute over this, the article will also likely fail its GA nomination as part of the criteria for GA status requires the article to have no recent disputes. While the nomination is open, can you please discuss any changes you would like to make to it with me? If you're too lazy to format your sources properly, just let me know what your source is and what information you think is notable from it and i'll format them appropriately if the source is reliable and if the information helps improve the article. And can you please, please not use bare urls anywhere on wikipedia, ever again - they cause a huge problem with 1256:{{unblock|There's no "combative language", just truth-dealing, as opposed to false assumptions/allegations where my explaination was just completely ignored like if it didn't exist. So please don't ignore what I say, instead of just automatically "listening and believing" everything "another administrator" (who's biased against me - including outside Knowledge (XXG)) says, incorrectly. If you want to know something, ask me, and I will answer. I'm not faking anything, including false attitudes. But when I'm left alone to just do my work, I do thousands edits straight with zero "combative language". This you casn easily verify too. I even stayed completely off GamerGate (and not only from this account), despite being its enthusiastic proponent off-wiki, because it's literally a battleground (and a huge one) and now I try to avoid any drama and go do editing elsewhere where things are not controversial (the article is a total sham anyway, btw).\ 503: 2105: 2053: 2001: 1949: 1897: 1845: 1793: 1741: 1689: 1637: 1585: 1533: 1481: 1427: 1371: 1281: 757: 1191:(mostly cleanup job, several hundred or so mostly vidya and seiyuu articles last year). As you can see, I don't care for any make-believe bullshit (it's not like I'd be ever paid for it or anything, all these "barnstars" and other nonsense has no real value), all edits are verifiably excellent (minus some typing-too-fast mistakes), and there what's most important: was never any drama shit happening whatsoever. 319:, which are not approved and are terrible for any article, especially one nominated for GA. And you obviously know this - why on earth would you go out of your way to add bare urls to an article and then tag it as having bare URLs? Obviously an article is ineligible for GA if it has a tag requiring clean up on it. Are you trying to sabotage this article? Most of these sources you added are from 1103: 879: 1188:"PresN's comment immediately below" was factually incorrect, I never made any 'second account "GhostofNiemti"' (and if I even have to state the obvious: a troll did it). But I might also point out you to just some of my other actual edits in a meantime (as in: not from this particular account). Because there were lots. (And lots.) And hey, you know what, I just will. Here's one example: 2122:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 2070:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 2018:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1966:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1914:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1862:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1810:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1758:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1706:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1654:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1602:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1550:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1498:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1446:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1390:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1300:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 776:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 180: 22: 1043:

Blocking admin's note- if you wanted to sock without being caught or keeping your "prior achievements", perhaps setting up the user page for this new user by making a second account "GhostofNiemti" to make the edit incredibly obvious wasn't the best idea. There are official ways to come back from an

315:. Please read this criteria. Unfortunately due to your recent edits the article no longer met the good article criteria, so I had to revert your edits. In order to be passed as a good article, the references need to all use the same approved formatting method. You added a large number of 704:, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Knowledge (XXG). For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on 551:. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. 1083:

the same article (I don't know who the actual user is, but obviously it's someone suffering from a severe OCD regarding especially this very article). Also, if I cared, I'd add the new GAs (at least 3 that I know about) to the list, you know.

979:, while keeping things essential, and I'm quite proud of this particular result). While almost nobody do anything anymore at all with the vidya subjects (with very few exceptions, such as Beemer being 513: 517: 201:. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on 964:

I wanted to leave all stupid drama shit behind (along with all the prior achievements and stats and other worthless crap) but it follows me anyway. So reason is:

1066:

wasn't me, it was another stalker/hater. I didn't even notice until you told me. I also think I (roughly) think who was impersonating me: the same vandal behind

1249:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

1035:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

825: 655: 591: 406: 361: 243: 115: 2134: 2082: 2030: 1978: 1926: 1874: 1822: 1770: 1718: 1666: 1614: 1562: 1510: 1458: 1402: 1312: 788: 436: 1063:

Hey "Blocking admin" (a very blocking admin, and very attached to own Knowledge (XXG) "achievements" that have no worth whatsoever in real life):

1234: 1020: 705: 532: 821: 651: 587: 402: 357: 239: 111: 697: 622: 484: 457: 101: 232:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

1143: 919: 312: 990:

articles into GAs recently, which was nice), which I guess is due to that Knowledge (XXG) editor bleeding crisis thing or whatever.

690: 540: 197:, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Knowledge (XXG) with an 768: 523:

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means

818:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 648:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 584:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 399:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 354:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 236:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 108:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2118:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2066:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2014:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1962:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1910:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1858:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1806:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1754:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1702:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1650:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1598:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1546:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1494:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1442:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1386:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1296:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 772:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2123: 2119: 2071: 2067: 2019: 2015: 1967: 1963: 1915: 1911: 1863: 1859: 1811: 1807: 1759: 1755: 1707: 1703: 1655: 1651: 1603: 1551: 1499: 1447: 1391: 1301: 777: 536: 1217: 1116: 892: 548: 1854: 1750: 1138: 914: 71: 2062: 2010: 1382: 1292: 1202:

Your combative language towards another administrator on this site leads me to believe your block is well warranted.

1110: 886: 544: 233: 1698: 1115:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

891:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

810:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

640:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

576:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

392: 391:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

346:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

100:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

28:

Hello, and welcome to Knowledge (XXG). This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to

713: 528: 437:

https://store.sonyentertainmentnetwork.com/#!/en-us/games/resident-evil/cid=UP0102-CUSA01068_00-BHRHDPS400000001

308: 198: 56: 480: 453: 251: 626: 1906: 1594: 701: 686: 472: 445: 1646: 971:(btw actually I've possibly concentrated on Arthurian myths more than on video games recently, especially 516:

to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is

316: 1259:

Disregard this, apparently I just lost my job and I don't really care right now. See you later maybe. --

975:

as I became quite obsessed and did read a few books on the subject and expanded it more than twice from

811: 563: 524: 150: 1958: 1438: 553:

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

2114: 1542: 1006: 709: 85: 1802: 1490: 689:. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Knowledge (XXG) uses a set of 1351: 1157: 933: 476: 449: 1934: 740: 332: 163: 1260: 1121: 1085: 1076: 897: 74: 1320: 1073: 1070: 841: 796: 671: 607: 527:

administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the

422: 377: 289: 146: 131: 1243: 1211: 1067: 1064: 1029: 557: 214: 202: 2142: 2090: 2038: 1986: 1882: 1830: 1778: 1726: 1674: 1622: 1570: 1518: 1466: 1410: 1051: 1002: 866: 641: 577: 149:. However, please do not add blank lines between list items, as you did there; they cause 81: 45: 41: 33: 1599: 1547: 1495: 1443: 1387: 1297: 773: 621:

Good evening... I wrote everything on the discussion page of the fairy ... see them ;) --

1347: 304: 987: 980: 502: 1930: 972: 832: