User talk:A.amitkumar/Archive 3

31: 2026: 1067: 181: 706: 4070: 775: 3289:

Hello. If I can have a say in this, I really believe you are both right on this specific issue. Having seen Quest Mall (only in pictures sorry) I must admit, that the lightning is a special and significant feature of the building. It would not be against the guidelines of Knowledge to mention it. The

2443:

hi Adam, When you say better known gardens are in russia then you mean to deviate from neutrality and are saying russia has better known botanical gardens. Did you mean this? or did you mean to list the better known gardens in russia? Please re-read the edits and let me know what your intent was. The

2194:

I think you have made a mistake because Sigmund Freud was a very disturbed psychologist and a lot of people don't like his ideas and think there must be a reason for him to have said such weird things about children in particular and since this is a page dedicated to this psychologist there should be

1702:

Actually atul kumar is notable enough too, just the link to image was wrong. Put the correct one now. dont try to compare people in an article, tomorrow some one may come and say how can some one like you or me be editing a page of such a great person like lord krishna. This is not a valid reason for

631:

Hi Benfold, Why did you think it is related? please provide valid sources and only then go ahead with relating them in the article (else that edit would be termed vandalism) . If you are not able to provide valid sources(which i did not find through out the article), I would strongly encourage you to

3980:

Thanks for the note - no, I am not conducting a test. I spent several hours fact checking and correcting the text, researching and constructing a new table for this page and entering fixes to the citations as requested. Yes, I am on a bit of a learning curve but I am making progress. Now all my work

3384:

Yes, Removal of templates for A10 (which means duplication of articles) by making it a redirect is a more neutral solution for such duplication of articles if the article heading is appropriate and is something that a user may search and allows for different search criteria. Sometimes a merge works.

2414:

Not sure why the change to the Botanical Gardens page was reverted to previous version. I was citing newer information from the most authoritative global database on BGs and citing it correctly. Tone was the same (non-neutral) as I simply changed the number of BGs in each region, no actual words.

1741:

Hi thanks for reaching out talk page, i dont see any reference to any content that says or claims that this was the first dolby surround episode? Also as per good standards imdb is best used as references only for writing credits or MPAA ratings - other content is mostly inappropriate to be used for

840:

Mr. Amit, I understand you have redacted a contribution I made to wikipedia, regarding the contact made (if any) between the israeli nuclear attack submarine fleet and the Indian Navy in the Eastern Mediterranean. The media has traditionally been silent about israeli nuclear weapons, but I do recall

4009:

The main article is never the best place to try out things. The best place is your sand box or at the least you should look at the preview of the page you are going to save before actually saving it. Treating the main article as sand box for your trials is not a good practice. I hope you make good

3976:

Hello, I'm A.amitkumar. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Trent Murphy that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk

2707:

Hello, I'm A.amitkumar. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Van Dale, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

2317:

You cannot assert that something is wrong without explaining what is wrong in a specific manner. just randomly tagging articles would not help. If there are valid references please provide them in the article talk page and mention what specific content needs maintenance. Because all pages you have

2288:

Because it is impossible, articles are incorrect, and my duty is to dispute them. Those who delete my despute have obligation to edit article, however, those articles can't be reliable at any point in time, since people who are biased and/or with incorrect and manifactured information write them.

3305:

Unless notable enough in references mentioning the mall this seems like a way to add promotional content. It is not a matter of what i or you assume about what is good about the mall, but what is notably mentioned about the mall from citations. Also the COI is due to the fact the editor adding is

2711:

What I did was adding two hyperlinks to crosslink the pages. One page mentioned the dictionary Van Dale but had no link to it while there is a page about. And on that page, a link in the text to the first page was missing, so I added it :). That was basically it. Sorry if I did not edit this talk

2346:

I wasn't trying to be offensive or corrupt Wiki. The ASW I referenced is proper corporate jargon for an individual who inadvertently replies all to an all staff email. If you are allowed pages for Wanker itself I do not see why you object to corporate jargon. I take it that you do not work in an

1391:

Hi there. I saw revisions changed for page (Brandon Mendelson) that I was contributing to pulled from sources including subjects book, website, and interviews. You stated they were not constructive, but I thought goal was to create encyclopedic pages? The information removed, I feel, goes toward

1186:

Please explain why you didn't think my edit wasn't contructive, preferable by replying to the argument I made. "If the fact that jokes are made based on the colloquial pronunciation is mentioned, then said colloquial pronunciation should also be mentioned. Otherwise readers may not know what the

3761:

If you dont see the preview before you save and see what content you have messed up, you will not realize that you are vandalizing the page. you have removed images by renaming it, messed up the infobox by duplicating the data. Please be warned i will report you to AIV if you dont stop and take

3233:

Hi I thought editing is to add extra information about the topic. I am the Project Engineer for that complete lighting project which had been the major attraction of the Quest Mall. This was the only reason to add to the article.If we keep the topic neutral then what is the point of editing in

2958:

It is not good practice in academic writing to refer to a past location using a contemporary name without clarifying. Without such clarification the sentence as it is presently worded (after your edit) implies that the region it refers to was known as "the state of Washington" in 1805. This is

4032:

Thank you for advice. The preview function is indeed helpful especially for the citation syntax. If you observe other systematic mistakes in my work flow please let me know. I am very confident about the content but am still learning about the formatting especially when it comes to photos and

2380:

You recently reverted my edit in scarless wound healing on the grounds of neutrality. The latest post is fairly neutral to me, I was pointing out the opposite to scarless wound healing is something that scars 'more' and scarification is a process to scar more. I do not see any problems with

1900:

An "advanced warning" is a warning that is sophisticated, or is near its conclusion, or something like that. Almost always it is a mistake for "advance warning", which means a warning given in advance. Every instance of "advanced warning" anywhere in Knowledge is almost certainly a mistake.

1155:

Also the template doesnt mean the article will be deleted. it will not be deleted unless an admin thinks so, so if you have valid reasons to believe otherwise the article which currently looks like a complete non-notable persons BLP, it is not us who will decide but by a neutral admin.

1988:

Hello I'm 2.1 Jibbz, I read on some webpage stating that Natalie Kelley and Bow Wow are schedule or sign to reappear in the new Fast & Furious movie, I'm not confirm for the 8th and 9th movie, just the 7th movie, I forgot what webpage it was, they wanted to continue the story

1213:

Hi, I did not mean to censor your edits, i really don't care for censorship in WP. I just don't believe the humor part if anything cultural. I have brought it to a separate section now. I may not be right in doing so, but let me know what the issues are in doing so? Thanks.

1414:

Hi thanks for reaching out to my talk page, I just wanted to remove the book reference which was not made correctly, but unfortunately The tool i was using reverted all your edits, This is entirely my mistake - Apologies for the same. Please feel free to undo my reverts.

3907:: sure thing, my edit *was* constructive. You set back the previous edit by an anon user who hacked a new section. I removed simply removed that section and even integrate a few words into another section. Just READ my edit before simply unediting it WITHOUT READING. 3428:

Hey, I was editing the Somatic Symptom Disorder page, trying to add new DSM-V criteria, and I'm trying to figure out how to do a proper reference. I should really register for an account before I make any changes, but if you want to add it real quick the reference is:

2810:

Hello. I added an additional Charles E. Hardy, who is a world renowned civil engineer who should be at least referenced for engineers in search of information regarding him. I am currently writing a Knowledge article which will be linked to this reference. Thank you.

3290:

problem is however, how will it be mentioned? Having read Vasans deleted text in the article, I must agree that it is too detailed for a wikipedia article. Maybe the whole thing will come to a common understanding if a good picture representing Quest Mall was put up?

1651:

Amit Kumar, You are wrong in restoring the page, as there is no need of putting pictures of Rajpal yadav and Raju Shrivastava. They are not so "BIG MAN", i mean how can you put them in the same category of Krishna or Amitabh Bachahan, and who the hell is Atul Kumar?

3796:

which you reverted as an "unexplained page blanking": generally, when a page is created by a user, and then tagged for deletion by a subsequent user, and then blanked by the initial user, this is considered a good faith request to delete the page (see

1712:

I actually did have a source that time, www.imdb.com/title/tt0701217/ which notes "Dolby" as the sound processing, I set it as a number format, your probably didn't notice it. I hope it is known as a "reliable" source and you will let me put it back.

207:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

323:

I revised it because the show is going to end its season finale on the 18th. It may be early to post it, but it will be ending on the 18th and there is nothing spoiler about it. I don't necessary understand the reasoning for the deletion

3828:

When using Huggle, the tool usually intimates me when a page is being blanked by the creator of the page itself. This time I did not see any intimation and hence did not tag with G7. Please feel free to revert my edits and tag it with G7.

3736:

I understand, I revised it appropriately to show it's true significance. I tried to keep it minimal as possible while still inputting historically claim, not just in the description, but also claim in the info box. Thank You

2862:

You wrote: When the page got speedy deleted (by an admin), it meant that the page was not worth creating. You are crossing the limits bordering vandalism when you try to recreate the same page again within the same day.

1281:

Because i noticed a lot of major changes to the article, but at that time did not have the time to research the edits and wanted to put a tag about the major changes the article was undergoing and bring more eyes to it.

1519:

I just put a warning in your page about 3RR. I used the warning so that you understand what 3RR means(by following the 3RR link) and how your revertion of other editors changes without consensus is breaking this rule.

211:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

3131:

Hey Amit, i have a doubt. In daily calender i saw, that diwali is on November 2nd (Saturday). But, in internet the date is November 3rd (Sunday). Which is the exact date? Do you have any idea about that? --

3572:

As mentioned in your talk page, please dont remove the content without an edit summary. Also removal of content doesnt resolve content disputes. Please use the article talk page for resolving content disputes.

2734:

What you did was add "fat van dale" in the text irrelevantly - the same context is made in History section. Also don't mess up my talk page. put the content at the bottom of my page or use the new section tab.

3103:. As I could understand your last name being same as the persons article you are editing. Also the name should be in sync with the article heading. If required move the page and change the names accordingly. 1791:

I will continue to make "nonconstructive edits" (as you call them) to this page until it is removed from Knowledge. This page has no business being on this site, and it will receive the treatment it deserves

3180:

Oh! So, which date needed to be kept in Wiki page. I was ought to change the date into "2". Suddenly i googled and thinking about which date to fix there. Your help will be appreciated. Thanks! --

3691:

Read the edit before you make a revision. My claim has been made and their is historical reference in place. Do not revert, but feel free to shorten and cite to the 1611 King James Bible as such.

3234:

Knowledge. I don't have any issues if you can find more details about this topic that would be great. I thought Knowledge was suppose to be the knowledge tank. By the way it's Quest Indulge.

98: 86: 2088:

Hi, I removed the redirect because a disambiguation page for "Al-Watan Party" has been created. Therefore, the redirect to one of the possible meanings is misleading and should be deleted.

745:

Being a share holder is not a notable entry for a BLP unless that is really crucial for his biography, it is his own company? do you mean he is a majority share holder? if so then say so.

204: 1191:

due to the colloquial pronunciation of its name. However, these jokes do not reflect the pronunciation preferred by astronomers, which is "you-ranus", with stress on the first syllable."

1548:

Amit, Information otherwise not available is best on a wiki, though it is not to tarnish the image etc. Otherwise there is no place for a honest true constructive criticism. UPPUVELLAM

2955:

You recently undid an edit I made to the article on Fort Clatsop under the grounds it was not constructive. While I respect your view-point, I disagree that it was not constructive.

1101:

Hey, I understand what you're saying but it may not be constructive but I'm sure it will be edited as days go and I've read about that guy and its true. I feel it should stay up. :)

1872:

What link are you trying to add? Try to check the other links that is added in the external links section and add it similarly, try to see the preview of your edits before saving.

1576:

You are quite mistaken, information should be available else where to be validly included in Knowledge. Please follow the five pillars of WP and wikipedia references policy as per

2885:

My response: I recreated the page since it does not meet the criteria for a speedy deletion. This person has relevance to the field of civil engineering (comparable to Henry Liu:

2351:

You need to understand WP better before you start messing around. I am sure you are working in a so called office where a wanker is a standard jargon, but not by WP standards.

1129:

A CSD template should not be removed unless you have corrected the issue brought upon by the template. You cannot guess that the page will become notable as Knowledge is not a

3071:

Why in the name of God did you undo my Edits??? Jamal Al-Haydari is MY UNCLE and the way the names are spelled are wrong, so if you could ReEdit them , that would be great.

3339: 1938:

Fair enough, mistakes can be made, but you and "Dan653" should be more careful before posting repeated false and defamatory accusations of vandalism and disruptive editing

946: 3713:

You dont add that content in an infobox. The details are already present, you are just messing up the article currently. The details are quite irrelevant and duplicate.

3432:

American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing. pp. 271–280.

1623:

Why does it look like vandalism? I removed some rubbish text from the edits but you removed the whole section with no reason which makes your edits look like vandalism.

485: 942: 2479:

Hi Amit, I added a further reading entry to this article. I actually did provide a source / cite. The source is Shareable. Is there something more I need to do?

3469: 481: 2959:

misinformation. Washington became a state in 1889. Furthermore, it is also possible that the sentence may be accused as being ethnocentric for the same reason.

2107:

Yes I think you made amistake. Because that issue is already discussed. Most of that text is not related to the topic and most of that are original resaerches.--

2763:

A.amitkumar: You recently reverted a change I made to the nutritional section on "beef" asking that the change be explained. It is explained on the talk page.

1680:

Any one notable enough to have a WP article can be put there. There is no categorization here. Atul kumar is surely something stupid. i am removing that one.

1304:

I removed 17k material from the article as apparent copyvio (in any case they are not fit for the article) but not sure if they are such. Another new editor

582:

Please try to add the valid references in the BLP page itself. use the ref tags when editing the article and add them to the text you add to the article.

4113: 4123: 1838: 902: 495: 193: 2979:

Hi, I agree, i understand that even the Washington territory was not created until 1853, I will revert my edits. My mistake, apologies for the same.

1868:

Hi, I wanted to include a link to an interview DOOM did with Bonafide. Unfortunately you removed it, please can you undo the change? Best, Oliver L.

4109: 1117: 532:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. 2238:

chola is the gujarati word for black eyed peas and not chic peas.. chic peas are called kabuli chana. from where do i get a source to prove this?

2782:

Hi, you mentioned that the talk page has some explanation, but i dont see any edits to the talk page since september. Can you please explain?

4119: 3744: 3698: 3498: 3449: 3436: 1834: 1729: 898: 848: 491: 356:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 293:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 250:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 145:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 102:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 2685: 992: 684: 918: 3952: 3914: 3663:

is not a valid argument by that editor. There are many messed up links and articles in WP, but that doesn't give a license to add more.

2965: 2719: 2305: 2245: 1828: 1793: 1609: 1448: 1399: 325: 2561:

You removed something I added to Esther Mcvey political career which was on BBC radio and BBC local radio so is in the public domain.

4049: 3997: 3247: 3031: 2909: 2568: 2486: 2397: 1965: 1943: 1902: 1363:

I think it is very careless of you to be blanking of a page just after getting off a ban. I have reported you, let the admins decide.

914: 361: 298: 255: 150: 107: 1824: 1668: 1020: 3407:

Thanks, we the WikiProject Volleyball members appretiate your envolvement and prompt action for the resolution of this situation.

3087: 2827: 2628:

I presume so. There was a further edit which I removed as well. Great working reverting vandalism though - consider applying for

2431: 1564: 891:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

3818: 1351: 1332:

Hello amitkumar ,sorry about the recent delete, but my sandbox is showing Avril lavigne page, anyyway i can delete it? thanks.

719:

are no longer functional. You've been identified as a user of STiki, and are kindly asked to upgrade to the current version at

76: 64: 59: 4116:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1831:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 723:

before continuing with use of the tool. Continuing to use older versions will be detrimental to the STiki project. Please see

488:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3612: 3560: 3491: 2897:

You might want to revise your opinion and reinstate my edit given that Santa Cruz produce a signature Otis Taylor model - ie

895:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 357: 294: 251: 146: 103: 3158:. I know it is confusing but it is so because different cultures even within India celebrate Diwali for different reasons. 2153: 2112: 386:

I have invited you to explain your comments about me at ANI, and if you like, you can also apologise for your violation of

2889:). The article is a work in progress, only a backbone to which others knowledgeable of the subject will add to over time. 347: 284: 241: 136: 93: 1113: 2381:

neutrality. I would say my edit adds balance. scarless is the opposite to scar more. Do you still hold that position?

664: 413:. I'm studying there, and was wondering if you'd like to join in helping me curate some pages relating to the city. -- 3981:

has been undone. If you would like to help me, the kindest thing would be to replace my edits and table. Thank you.

787: 3043:

If there is no WP article, it is not notable enough to be listed. Persisting on this point is considered vandalism.

1309: 1257: 1084: 938: 863:

Hi IP, until there is something reference-able let me know, else it is best to keep it out of the article. Thanks.

38: 4019: 3938: 3882: 3838: 3771: 3748: 3722: 3702: 3672: 3660: 3582: 3521: 3502: 3453: 3394: 3354: 3315: 3273: 3210: 3167: 3112: 3052: 2988: 2933: 2872: 2848: 2791: 2744: 2653: 2618: 2592: 2542: 2510: 2460: 2360: 2327: 2269: 2219: 2171: 2131: 2067: 2002: 1925: 1881: 1751: 1725: 1689: 1632: 1589: 1529: 1475: 1424: 1372: 1291: 1223: 1165: 1142: 872: 852: 754: 741:

my edit was constructive i was changing his occupation because he is a current shareholder of newman enterprises

649: 591: 437: 246: 234: 197: 3362: 988:

As I already explained to you, you should have reverted only the second edit, not the first. Compare these two.

3865: 996: 892: 680: 473: 289: 277: 188: 172: 3201:

I would leave it at 3 november as thats the gazetted holiday for Diwali in India at central government level.

2962:

I submit, therefore, that my edit was constructive and respectfully ask that you reverse your following edit.

2689: 4100:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2674:

Thanks for your warning to 203.49.16.254 to stop disruptive editing. This user had done massive vandalism at

1811:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1109: 472:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3956: 3918: 2969: 2723: 2301: 2249: 1797: 1772: 1613: 1452: 1403: 1265: 1047: 798:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

395: 329: 2162:

I am really sorry, This is a very stupid mistake by me. I think i will take a break from WP for few hours.

1080: 4045: 3993: 3251: 3027: 2913: 2572: 2490: 2393: 2093: 1969: 1947: 1906: 1498:

Please read the user's talk page before saying that I didn't attempted to discuss the matter. Here it is

2210:

Do you have any references for it? if not then Knowledge is not the place to publicize your own theories.

578:

Please reconsider my adjustments to Peter north. I can get you the link to the podcast. IP 174.92.85.185

2636: 2309: 2297: 1664: 1316: 1272: 1041:

It's along standing article, so I removed the (nauseating) spam and left the encyclopedic part. Cheers,

1024: 606: 455: 418: 47: 17: 4101: 3873:

Thanks, i noticed the removal of G7 by my edit and had placed it back. Missed removing the G7 warning.

3023: 2389: 1042: 1660: 4037: 3985: 3910: 3740: 3694: 3600: 3548: 3445: 3243: 3083: 3079: 3075: 3019: 2905: 2823: 2815: 2715: 2681: 2614: 2564: 2482: 2427: 2423: 2419: 2385: 2293: 2241: 1778: 1721: 1717: 1656: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1444: 1395: 1339: 1305: 1105: 1016: 844: 826: 724: 529: 522: 2839:

you linked the wrong charles hardy in your edit. Create the page, get it assessed and then link it.

817:

Churches, Bible Study, Counselling, Prayer Meetings, House Groups, Youth-Teen-Children Meetings ||||

557:

If you can tell what the article is about, it has context. , speedy declined & changed to Prod.

3862: 3854: 3295: 2200: 1347: 674: 1505: 3858: 3805: 3608: 3556: 3375:

edits a good solution to those mirror articles? Is ok to remove the templates in place that way?

3335: 2629: 1441:

Thank you for clarity. How should book citation appear in references so that I may do it right?

1238: 1199: 1195: 391: 141: 129: 2149: 2108: 1703:

removing the images. If there is any other reason then let me know.18:05, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

4139: 4041: 3989: 3477: 3433: 3408: 3376: 2089: 1854: 1509: 1130: 974: 621: 613: 511: 371: 308: 265: 160: 117: 4010:

use of the sand box and leave the main article unless you are sure about what you are doing.

3929:

you have got the answer in the edit summary now of the next editor who looked at your edits.

4012: 3931: 3875: 3831: 3764: 3715: 3665: 3575: 3514: 3387: 3347: 3308: 3266: 3203: 3160: 3105: 3045: 2981: 2926: 2865: 2841: 2784: 2771: 2737: 2646: 2633: 2585: 2535: 2503: 2453: 2353: 2320: 2262: 2212: 2164: 2124: 2060: 2025: 1995: 1918: 1874: 1744: 1682: 1625: 1582: 1522: 1468: 1463: 1417: 1365: 1313: 1284: 1269: 1242: 1216: 1203: 1158: 1135: 865: 747: 712: 642: 584: 538: 451: 430: 414: 3495: 2819: 1188: 822: 779: 720: 716: 346: