Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:ABIJXY

Source 📝

203:
release their own annual estimates. It is too costly (and too intensive and time consuming) for the Census Bureau to have a Census every year. That is one reason there is a Census taken only every decade. The Census is actually flawed for many reasons such as: Respondents not completing Census surveys; Census takers making mistakes, not going to every household, failing to turn in Census data for a particular area or neighborhood etc. It is my understanding that to rectify these mistakes the Census Bureau actually uses estimated data when releasing the official Census demographic data.
199:
they undertake) is to conduct and release accurate estimates. They are biased to no city or county. They study the issue using known facts and detailed statistical information, then perform and release accurate estimates every year for every city, and county in California. The U.S. Census Bureau does not. The state DOF may be biased (to the state of California) in trying to obtain a larger share of tax dollar return/revenue from the federal government, but they are not biased to individual cities within the state.
401: 191:
history of just deleting or reverting other peoples work without engaging them, (or other WP members/editors) or actually performing the research to document your changes. I have left your changes as you made them after deleting/reverting mine. This is the link to my reference (documentation) of the CA DOF current population estimates for California released on April, 30th 2009.
231:? That's fine (and it looks good), but until it's finished, it should be in your userspace, so it isn't reached from main Knowledge (XXG) articles and isn't tagged inappropriately (I found it on uncategorized pages, and I see it is linked on a large number of bot-generated lists). I've gone ahead and moved it to 252:
There's an unincorporated area of San Mateo County in between San Francisco and Daly City where the Olympic Club lies. I'm pretty sure that while the Olympic Club extends into San Mateo County, it does not extend into Daly City. In fact, if you drive on Skyline Blvd. going south, you don't reach Daly
198:
Secondly, The California Department Of Finance is a neutral organization. They are responsible for distributing tax dollars to all the cities and counties in California based on the estimated population of those cities. Therefore arguably the single most important thing they do, (and research effort
194:
I am not biased to anything I cannot legitimately document. I abide by the concepts of neutrality and accuracy. Although I am new to Wiki as an editor, I have thoroughly read the Wiki pages which state the principles of creating or editing articles/pages. (The following is my belief and opinion. It
202:
Each state's Finance Department (or whatever title they use) is much better suited to estimate the population within their state than the federal government is. This is a logical conclusion based on scope and scale. The Census Bureau actually relies on the individual states for data they use to
121:
Keep in mind also that all Knowledge (XXG)'s "rules" are rules of thumb; links need to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, and simply repeating a reference to the rule isn't a very convincing argument to a longtime Wikipedian. Please make sure that you give specific details for why you remove
190:
That information is/was incorrect and all I did was correct it. The cited 2007 estimate, is not from the CA DOF but rather the U.S. Census bureau. Furthermore you did not include/site a reference link corroborating the statement. I can see from previous comments/messages here, that you have a
71:
the change you made seems wrong. She should be ineligible for all raises until Jan 2011 and a law should be passed documenting such. She may not need an immediate rollback, but she will have to surrender next years cost of living adjustment. There must be a source somewhere documenting
113:
without comment except for a jargon reference in the edit summary which would be completely incomprehensible to any newbie editor. I would appreciate it if in the future you would be clearer in your edits and interactions with other editors, particularly when they've left
357:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 302:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 182:
If the California Department Of Finance is not a neutral organization, then why did you leave the 2007 estimate there? "The California Department Of Finance estimates its population at 939,899 as of 2007."
206:
I would appreciate it if you would engage members on discussion or talk pages before making unilateral changes to an article page or ask an editor for their advice on the subject. -Thank you.
47:
S'okay, I still loved the restructuring of the Yelamu sentence, that's why I did the c/p from your previous edit and put it back. No need to "throw the baby out with the bathwater"! :-D
412: 155:
Thank you for cutting-and-pasting something I already ready on the link you've shown several times. Would you be interested in responding to my actual statements instead? --
232: 115: 137:
It might be better if you responded to my points. As a 7-year veteran of Knowledge (XXG), I'm familiar with how to find your links already. --
110: 29:. What I've done is reverted your last edit, then incorporated your textual changes regarding the Yelamu tribal group in the very next edit. 408: 382: 327: 32:
Everything I've looked at reinforces the current article statement, attributing the founding of Misiòn San Francisco de Asìs to Fr. Palou.
268: 254: 82: 86: 378: 323: 228: 404: 393: 21:
Greetings and Salutations! I hope you don't mind too much, but I found a historical inaccuracy in your latest edit to the
369:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
314:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
374: 319: 267:
If you google "map of Daly City," it confirms what I've just said. None of the Olympic Club is within its city limits.
272: 258: 447: 235:. Please continue working with it there and then move it back into the mainspace when it is ready. Thanks. 160: 142: 127: 78: 52: 37: 370: 315: 184: 346: 337: 291: 282: 209: 90: 213: 366: 350: 311: 295: 420: 239: 173:================================================================================================ 436: 156: 138: 123: 73: 48: 33: 362: 354: 307: 299: 94: 365:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 358: 310:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 303: 68: 118:
asking any hit-and-run deleters to provide feedback should they remove the link again.
416: 236: 26: 22: 448:
http://www.dof.ca.gov/research/demographic/reports/estimates/e-1/2008-09/
353:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
298:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
424: 386: 331: 276: 262: 242: 217: 164: 146: 131: 99: 56: 41: 437:
http://www.census.gov/popest/cities/tables/SUB-EST200701.xls
187:
It seems you have some bias against San Jose or the CA DOF.
411:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at 345:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 290:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 253:City until after you've passed the Olympic Club. 233:User:ABIJXY/List of parks in San Francisco/Draft 413:the entry on the Templates for discussion page 109:Hi, ABIJXY! I notice you removed a link from 8: 227:It seems you are doing this to improve the 429: 111:Noe Valley, San Francisco, California 7: 405:Template:16TeamBracket-Finals3reseed 394:Template:16TeamBracket-Finals3reseed 223:List of parks in San Francisco/Draft 105:Please cooperate with fellow editors 178:Please Work With The Wiki Community 17:Changes to history of San Francisco 14: 371:review the candidates' statements 316:review the candidates' statements 116:an explicit note on the talk page 399: 377:. For the Election committee, 347:Arbitration Committee election 338:ArbCom elections are now open! 322:. For the Election committee, 292:Arbitration Committee election 283:ArbCom elections are now open! 229:List of parks in San Francisco 1: 387:14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 332:14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 243:03:32, 6 September 2009 (UTC) 100:20:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC) 57:18:36, 14 February 2009 (UTC) 42:07:29, 14 February 2009 (UTC) 277:13:51, 1 November 2012 (UTC) 263:13:46, 1 November 2012 (UTC) 392:Nomination for deletion of 373:and submit your choices on 318:and submit your choices on 466: 379:MediaWiki message delivery 324:MediaWiki message delivery 195:is not fact necessarily). 165:20:02, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 147:16:22, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 132:01:01, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 25:section of the article on 425:20:20, 4 May 2021 (UTC) 218:12:23, 9 May 2009 (UTC) 122:information. Thanks! -- 409:nominated for deletion 351:Arbitration Committee 296:Arbitration Committee 355:arbitration process 300:arbitration process 367:arbitration policy 312:arbitration policy 185:Disputed_Statement 67:Unless you have a 98: 457: 450: 445: 439: 434: 403: 402: 76: 465: 464: 460: 459: 458: 456: 455: 454: 453: 446: 442: 435: 431: 400: 397: 375:the voting page 341: 320:the voting page 286: 250: 225: 180: 175: 107: 65: 19: 12: 11: 5: 463: 461: 452: 451: 440: 428: 396: 390: 344: 340: 335: 289: 285: 280: 249: 246: 224: 221: 179: 176: 174: 171: 170: 169: 168: 167: 150: 149: 106: 103: 64: 61: 60: 59: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 462: 449: 444: 441: 438: 433: 430: 427: 426: 422: 418: 414: 410: 406: 395: 391: 389: 388: 384: 380: 376: 372: 368: 364: 360: 356: 352: 348: 339: 336: 334: 333: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 309: 305: 301: 297: 293: 284: 281: 279: 278: 274: 270: 269:69.181.41.173 265: 264: 260: 256: 255:69.181.41.173 247: 245: 244: 241: 238: 234: 230: 222: 220: 219: 215: 211: 207: 204: 200: 196: 192: 188: 186: 177: 172: 166: 162: 158: 154: 153: 152: 151: 148: 144: 140: 136: 135: 134: 133: 129: 125: 119: 117: 112: 104: 102: 101: 96: 92: 88: 84: 80: 75: 70: 62: 58: 54: 50: 46: 45: 44: 43: 39: 35: 30: 28: 27:San Francisco 24: 16: 443: 432: 398: 342: 287: 266: 251: 248:Olympic Club 226: 208: 205: 201: 197: 193: 189: 181: 120: 108: 74:TonyTheTiger 66: 49:Edit Centric 34:Edit Centric 31: 20: 363:topic bans 308:topic bans 91:WP:CHICAGO 407:has been 359:site bans 304:site bans 237:Rigadoun 210:Jcheckler 63:Saxbe fix 417:Frietjes 95:WP:LOTM 72:that.-- 23:history 349:. The 294:. The 240:(talk) 157:brion 139:brion 124:brion 69:WP:RS 421:talk 383:talk 328:talk 273:talk 259:talk 214:talk 161:talk 143:talk 128:talk 53:talk 38:talk 343:Hi, 288:Hi, 87:bio 423:) 415:. 385:) 361:, 330:) 306:, 275:) 261:) 216:) 163:) 145:) 130:) 97:) 55:) 40:) 419:( 381:( 326:( 271:( 257:( 212:( 159:( 141:( 126:( 93:/ 89:/ 85:/ 83:c 81:/ 79:t 77:( 51:( 36:(

Index

history
San Francisco
Edit Centric
talk
07:29, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Edit Centric
talk
18:36, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
WP:RS
TonyTheTiger
t
c
bio
WP:CHICAGO
WP:LOTM
20:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Noe Valley, San Francisco, California
an explicit note on the talk page
brion
talk
01:01, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
brion
talk
16:22, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
brion
talk
20:02, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Disputed_Statement
Jcheckler
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.