User talk:AHeneen/Archive 1

495:. This is not a small job and cannot be done in isolation, the tables now do not sum, and they disagree with each other. These tables, or templates, are also included in other related pages and causes discrepancies on those pages including rendering some of the text in those pages incorrect. The tables also do not match the references cited. Changing this little number is a very big job. In the past it was chaos because people updated the tables piecemeal in response to press releases and other sources, consequently, the consensus arose to use ONLY the official Airbus O&D, this pretty much fixed the numbers churn. This comes out monthly so we just need to wait. I would recommend that the change be reverted. 937: 4274: 2671: 4289: 1081: 973: 4253: 2699: 949: 4351: 2745: 3057: 4393: 3415: 31: 2769:

through to the third round, a minimum score of 55 was required for a wildcard competitor to go through. We had a three-way tie at 55 points and all three have qualified for the next round, in the spirit of fairness. The third round ends on June 28, with the top two in each group progressing automatically while the remaining 16 highest scorers across all four groups go through as wildcards. Good luck to all competitors for the third round!

1782: 4548: 3117: 1769: 4238: 3621: 3525: 3317: 2963: 2534: 2365: 2274: 1997: 1885: 1540: 987: 674: 314: 1760: 769: 201:. I have no intentions of making any changes to the article myself, but was just hoping to get input from editors previously involved in the article (or recently-closed AfD) in an effort to improve the article and clarify its purpose. I will leave any changes to the consensus of other editors who decide what's best. Your participation would be welcome, regardless of your views on the issue. Thank you. 1037: 4502: 4190: 4131: 2164: 4368: 4326: 1058: 4309: 2720: 1008: 4410: 3442: 2652: 2207: 1693: 2845: 2456: 2105: 1408: 2634: 2928: 4562:

Thank you for your help with my edits to the Knowledge (XXG) article United States Ambassador to Somalia. My original confusion arose because some of the media articles, which I used as sources and which you redacted, erroneously refer to McAnulty as "U.S. Ambassador to Somalia". I was of the opinion

3489:

have been deleted and other have changed. Living in elsass, I have in my Watchlist many cities in Bas-Rhin and Haut-Rhin. The fact is that many cities (also very small cities) are up-to-date, but we are not sure that it's the case of all cities. If you want, I can spend some time tomorow to check it.

1505:

I suppose I am addicted to Knowledge (XXG). As a former newspaper reporter and editor, and a journalism professor of a quarter century specializing in writing and editing, I can’t keep away from hammering away at a keyboard in a manic attempt to edit and to create. I have tried to take breaks, but it

4070:

But what about this though? "The transformation, modification or adaptation of the work must be *substantial* and bear its author's personality to be original and thus protected by copyright." Is it substantial? One could argue that in an age where photography is cheap and easy, a simple 2D photo of

2896:

Sorry I wasn't able to catch this before you got far through the article. It should be referred to as "Flight 370", not "Flight MH370". This follows the style used on aviation accident articles to refer to the flight as "Flight " and is consistent with all the Flight 370-related articles, except the

1736:

Hi, I'm glad you've joined the DYK reviewing team! I'd like to mention that just because an article passed GA doesn't mean it's an automatic yes for DYK. We've found many GA articles with close paraphrasing and citation problems, and some have even been sent back for GA reassessment in the course of

4041:

How would one categorize a work that is with extreme likelihood (99.999%) not in any substantive way original, but the very original doesn't publicly exist, or we don't know which one is "the original"? For example, the photo from Flickr that we have on The Atomium is an OK photo (though cut off at

2768:

The points varied across groups, with the lowest score required to gain automatic qualification was 68 in Group A - meanwhile the second place score in Group H was 404, which would have been high enough to win all but one of the other Groups! As well as the top two of each group automatically going

3809:

It's a matter of degree: were any of these people or entities involved in the event during a significant portion of their own lifespan, as in the case of ships in the Gulf War? Alternatively: was their participation particularly notable, e.g., did they find important evidence? I've responded about

2911:

I'm sorry about that; i thought it would be a logical change and didn't realise it was rooted in an established protocol. I'll go back to the March section because i chnaged all incidences of it there. Thanks for explaining the protocol; I don't have pings enabled so I've only just seen your note.

604:

Ok, but how can it be modified to note suspended services? The reason I changed the table format was because I didn't recognize it (at the time I made the edit) as a common table format (and there was no ref for the "start date")...I usually see the second table format without start/end but with a

1497:

But I did want to introduce myself. For a good many years I have specialized in creating or editing Knowledge (XXG) articles about Los Angeles — its neighborhoods, its history, its public servants — oh, all that stuff. I have either originated or contributed to most of the articles on Los Angeles

1332:

seems to act like I did it BOLDly for no apparent reason. Could you explain to him what's going on? Cuz I'm at the end of my tether with him right now. It seems like he refuses to stop fighting until he "gets" something, regardless of how many people disagree with him or how off-base his ideas

944:

That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. 64 competitors made it into this round, and are now broken into eight groups of eight. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups. Round 1 saw some

3248:

Sorry, I didn't want to cast any aspersions on you- I was trying to get across how "not OK" the comment was without being too dictatorial. Best of luck finding a reviewer, by the way; I appreciate how frustrating this can be. I've got a good bit in the queue myself, but I managed to get enough

1501:

Also I notice your interest in international relations. That was my field when I was at UCLA, although I graduated from UC Riverside with a major in government. I worked for two years in Geneva, with the International Labor Organization. Interesting life, but I returned to UCLA to get an MA in

288:

Thank you. I was not aware of the requirement to attribute PD content and put the html comment in so that the section wouldn't be accused of copy-vio and to encourage others to re-write/improve upon that text. I added the text just a couple hours after the quake, when the section seemed both

4284:), who is competing in his sixth consecutive Wikicup final, again finished the round in first place, with an impressive 1666 points in Pool B. Casliber writes about the natural sciences, including ornithology, botany and astronomy. A large bulk of his points this round were bonus points. 533:

Thanks. There are similar notes dotted around the various tables. As soon as the Airbus O&Ds for June come out please feel free to update everything but make sue all the tables pages and texts agree, it's quite tedious but useful, I used to do it but now I hope somebody else does.

561:

There is some discrepency in the list, there are three Dutch people with dual citizenship one each from Israel, USA and Belgium, two Britons one each from South Africa and New Zealand, so shouldnt tehe dual citizen section for all these countries includ these numbers?

1246: 254:

Hi. I am not an admin and this is just a friendly comment to a fellow editor. You obviously know it's ok to add public domain text verbatim to an article, but you might not realize that you need to attribute the text to the source to avoid any appearance of

3782:

Not entirely. I was trying to create a category to list people, agencies, and vessels that participated in the search. I realize now that the first two aren't appropriate, however, I would still like a category to group vessels involved in the search. The

4588:

A user continues to remove Merida as a future destination from the list since the airline is starting the route on March 3, 2016. Can you take a look? Thanks! If the destinations do not include future route, then SYD should not be added until is served.

3493:

Concerning the future new region, I don't know what is the policy on wikidata, but for your information, on frwiki it has been decided that we won't change the regions name until the 1st January, and then at this date a bot will replace all in one hit.

1498:

City Council members and Los Angeles city attorneys, dating back to 1853. I’ve been able to use my L.A. Public Library card to good advantage over the Internet, even though I don’t live in L.A. any more. I’m glad you share my interest in history.

2667:

The second round one has all wrapped up, and round three has now begun! Congratulations to the 34 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our second round. Leading the way overall was

4003:

Can a person have the copyright of an architectural photograph in the United States that they took? From what I have read, they can't. It seems a bit ambiguous. And if they can't, can one still slap a Creative Commons license on it?

4267:

The scores required to move onto the semifinals were impressive; the lowest scorer to move onto the finals was 407, making this year's Wikicup as competitive as it's always been. Our finalists, ordered by round 4 score, are:

2402: 2576: 4320:), first in Pool A, came in third. His specialty is natural science articles; in Round 4, he mostly submitted articles about insects and botany. Five out of the six of the GAs he submitted were level-4 vital articles. 4506: 3206: 3189: 3184: 3168: 3163: 3147: 3142: 3081: 4425:

The intense competition between RO and Calvin999 will continue into the finals. They're both eligible for the Newcomers Trophy, given for the first time in the Wikicup; whoever makes the most points will win it.

4384: 1582: 1493:

First, I want to apologize if I have upset you with some of my recent edits. Obviously I don’t mean anything personal by my edits, and I make them only because I think they will be good for the encyclopedia.

4492: 4485: 392:

I have just trimmed the 'Analysis of satellite communication' section that you wrote, and would appreciate it if you could look it over to ensure that I have not changed the meaning of anything. Regards,

1024: 3285: 2897:

unofficial theories article (which hasn't been copyedited yet). I will copy-paste a footnote explanation of why MH370 is used from another article. Sorry for not being able to catch this until late.

97:- 4401: 4085:

The law gives the photographer copyright protection. I am not a judge to decide if the change is "substantial", but we must be cautious and assume that the work qualifies for copyright protection.

4264:) at 864 points, who although submitted just 2 FAs for 400 points, earned double that amount for those articles in bonus points. Everyone who moved forward to Round 4 earned at least 100 points. 259:. The guideline is that there needs to be a visible attribution in either the text or the reference section, so your comment in the html just proves good intentions. I replaced your citation with 4380: 4359: 3289: 2865: 2714:. Remember, you do not need to work on an article on your own - as long as each person has completed significant work on the article during 2015, multiple competitors can claim the same article. 3288:. Reading the discussion, there seems to be a lot about Kww's behauvior but not so much about TRM. I remember there was an excellent ANI thread about TRM's rude behauvior at ITN/C. I found it: 1506:

is an impossibility. Not only do I have my watch list of favorites, but I also hover like a vulture over the Recent Changes page and pounce on any submissions that are found wanting. Oh, well.

995: 4563:

that by the time of my last edits, I had clarified that McAnulty is an envoy in charge of a mission or what used to be called a legation. Anyway, thank you for your knowledge and help.

1928: 4317: 2728: 2660: 1016: 4231:

The finals for the 2015 Wikicup has now begun! Congrats to the 8 contestants who have survived to the finals, and well done and thanks to everyone who took part in rounds 3 and 4.

4418: 4261: 3202: 2861: 2707: 519:

because I believe my response/comments were important enough to the page that they should be on its talk page (where they will receive attention) rather that here on my talk page.

4281: 4246: 3886:. Read the template's documentation to understand how it works. Template:Rp is used many times throughout the article and is an alternative to converting the entire article to use 2753: 2678: 957: 1125:, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from 1117:

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on

4334: 4296: 3945:

Anyway, I'm checking the file for this reason: the good news is that a Chinese translation's being made, so more people will get to see your maps. Thank you for your good work!

3198: 1088: 1045: 980: 1730: 3295:

I think it would be a good idea if you posted those diffs at the ArbCom evidence section (max 500 words and 50 diffs), it would be really of value I think. What do you say? --

1738: 2312: 2220: 4376: 1066: 4379:), from Pool A, likes to work on articles about British geography and places. Most of his points this round were earned from two impressive accomplishments: a GT about 4020: 3761: 3359: 3001: 829:

containing even more information. I guess Victor Iannello made this plot himself, but I don't know where he got the (ATC?) data. I guess it's uncitable at present?

2485: 1700:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See 516: 3126: 4362:), from Pool A, was our highest-scoring wildcard. West Virginia tends to focus on articles about the history of (what for it!) the U.S. state of West Virginia. 4249:) in Group B, who earned 1496 points. Although 913 of these points were bonus points, he submitted 15 articles in the DYK category. Second place overall was 2412: 2046: 3721: 3716: 2586: 4135: 3811: 3428: 4404:), from Pool B, came in seventh overall. RO earned the majority of her points from GARs and PRs, many of which were earned in the final hours of the round. 1456: 3680: