User talk:Adamrce - Knowledge (XXG)

546:... It was a sourced comparative introductory sentence "bla bla..., like most major religions." An editor disputed the second part saying that "Sikhism" is not named after...bla. I think he was confused, or haven't realized, that Sikhism was not included because it's not a major religion and the sentence didn't mention "all". When I removed the second part, it was reverted as if the disputer still disliked it. Anyways, I won't waste my time on a silly sentence, so I won't add it there. The mistake I know I've done is adding it in the lead, at first. If others don't like it, it's fine with me (but I don't accept un-reasoned reverts). 2810: 3958: 1598:

I will happily mend my ways. As for citations please help me as to how to do it as most of the knowledge is in my head and pretty basic for any one who is knowledgeable about Islam but to find e.g. a particular Hadith number or book is very time consuming. In fact the references already in the article contain many of them already, but the past author did not have sufficient understanding to convey matters in a more precise way as I have tried to do. All advise and suggestions will be gladly received and acted upon.

4064:. There's a new bonus prize of $ 200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale! 1458:

least got him to think about things more, and maybe a bit later Surturz would have deleted the page as unnecessary. Instead its a big hullabaloo because an admin got zealous about squashing it. I'm really just in favor of admins using the 'tools' that *all* editors have more often, which is communication and the interpersonal touch, rather than so quickly resorting to the 'tools' that only admins have. Leadership by example more than leadership by force. --

2582: 3134:. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Knowledge (XXG) using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate 3111: 953:

of view by adding the new source. I added the new source because it was an updated (three weeks after the previous source) point of view of the top American military officer. If you have a problem with his point of view that's a whole 'nother matter. In any case, Geromasis had the right idea by totaly removing that paragraph from the lead since opinions of that kind should be mentioned in that kind of article but not in the lead.

1478:. I do agree that alternative actions could-of been taken, but I'd also see it a pathetic subject to waste my time on. It's the same thing if a non-admin tagged it with speedy-deletion then an admin deleted it. Also, I think the statistics proved to you that non-admins had a close vote with admin, which means that the admins didn't take it personally. Anyways, don't be too picky, have fun, and stay out-of trouble... jk 365:. The article is still under "Category:Religious_terrorism" (I almost put my talkpage under religions terrorism ;). You can create another category of "Hindu terrorism" under politic terrorism or something. Again, the template should only match the article's categories, so please try to fix it to avoid conflicts with someone else. You can't just explain it in the discussion page. Take care and happy editing... 3839: 3591: 4075: 3887: 2387: 48: 21: 3217: 2626: 1992: 1325: 750:@Avanu, in this case the problem was getting a little convoluted - as the comment had been removed, restored, stricken, and debated - and I felt it was best to remove it to the archive to prevent any issues arising that might get the best of intentioned editors into any trouble. I had already placed a note about "not using the talk page as a forum" some days previously. 3332: 3277: 3154: 2894: 2679: 2514: 2333: 1930: 1264: 849: 4150: 3440: 3016: 1223: 438:, i see your also trying to get support for it. At least your taking me seriously as a Wikipedian (i am happy at how much you think about me). i have only been involved with content disagreements with you, hardly any violation of wiki policies that require a ban. Its also ironic that you accuse me of certain policy violations-- 904:

except that they took a few checkpoints in no-mans land between Zliten and Misrata. And I didn't violate the OR rule because my sentence was properly sourced with what the admiral said, that the campaign is at a stalemate. I was offended by your accusation considering I am currently fighting a number

2527:

for their contributions, including a brand new one for the single largest wikified article! All you have to do is put an asterisk next to the largest article you've wikified, and coordinators will check its wordcount after the drive ends. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article

2346:

2294:

Hello, I am writing from WikiProject Barnstar Awarding. As a member of the project, I thought you may be interested in one of our new feature - a live news feed. Formally, any project news was displayed on the project page and any important messages (like this one) had to be idividualy delivered. We

1663:

There seems to be unnecessary duplication of subject matter some unnecessary and others better placed in one combined article e.g. Islamic Jurisprudence - Marital. Rather than separate ones on Marital another on Sexual another on sexual technique another on marriage in Islam etc.. Let me know who or

1597:

and some others which you can check out from my talk page. First I went to twinkle page as it was what I thought was the area to respond in as the page of the article said it needed major clean up by an expert and directed me there. I felt I could assist. If I am on wrong pages or doing things wrong

1473:

I partially agree to your points, but you also agreed that it's not private. He probably didn't have much visitors (assuming, as the statistics clears when a page is deleted), but it was still a misleading conclusion of one editor's false opinion that admins are unaccountable. He got over 800 visits

1001:

goes. They haven't taken the key town of Gharyan (gateway to Tripoli from the south), they haven't taken the key town of Zawiyah (gateway to Tripoli from the west), they haven't taken the key town of Zliten (gateway to Tripoli from the east), they haven't taken the most importantly key town of Brega

1021:

Hehe, you're funny dude. I'm not mad, but all human make mistakes. The first thing I do is apologize or at least avoid the matter, so insistence of accusations that I falsely accuse others is simi-insulting to me (personally). Anyways, it's no big deal, and I never liked the paragraph anyways. When

952:

Not my conclusion, I removed the part that wasn't even in the source. Again, there was no mention in this particular source of rebels having secured battlegrounds of key cities, what the source did say was that they took only a few checkpoints in no-mans-land. And I wasn't pushing my personal point

797:

I modified the santur page so that it is representative of the different santurs out there. I included citations and added a talk to the discussion page. This is not emotionally and politically motivated since I am not Babylonian and Babylon doesn't exist anymore. It's just that the real history of

522:

Q: Can't figure out what's going on on the Islam page. Would you please put something on the talk page to help me understand why you think the point about Islam not being named for a person is important? I have to say I came to your user page to see if you seem reasonable -- and you do. So why not

2449:

For what it's worth, undue weight is something that has to be considered with a few points in mind, the impact it had, how long it lasted, how significant an event it was in the subjects history. Duration of time is not the only deciding factor, however. The fact that the civil war lasted only 30

996:

Jeez, take it easy, we're not in a life and death strugle here. :D Hmmm, actualy they haven't taken any cities for two and a half months now since Misrata back in May, so by all accounts that reporter is grossly missinformed. :) They have only taken villages and small towns in the mountains of no

1457:

My impression is that censorship of things done in the private userspace, although they are not hidden, it is clear that they aren't for public use, and policy gives us more latitude. I think if admin Ed had actually just had a friendly chat with Surturz after he saw this page, he could have at

1449:

I went back and read your first comment in the MfD, and in many ways I agree with you. I don't think the page is particularly stellar, my main 'beef' is just whether its ok for a person to express in a fairly private way, the things that they feel should be improved. I don't want censorship of

1767: 4087:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1022:

it comes to editing, who cares about those details and original research. We just have to present whatever sources we have there, without being picky. Actually your second false claim about the reporter mistaken is simply wrong, as that was a statement from the "NATO Secretary General"

853: 496:

The 2009 case is already convicted; however, I just said that a new case needs to be open because you need to point-out the sock-master. The previous case was regarding three other accounts. Looks good to me, and keep the golden-eye open. I've added a bit of disrespect, also. Thanks...

1453:

I think in a lot of cases, just thinking stuff through by oneself is sufficient to get past it, and if they feel they need outside help, they can go do that, or if an admin sees these complaints, they can thoughfully respond and try to bridge that gap and make the person feel welcome.

3999: 409:

Fixed. Thanks for letting me know, I would have never caught that otherwise. Someone was apparently confused back when I created the category and added those cats to it. The Saffron terror article really explains it all, it's not religious in the slightest.

920:

It's the same thing: there where two sentences from the same source, you left one and removed another. Ain't that removing sourced material? Don't try to flip the coin, and I'm still with my words. If you don't get it, I'll quote it here for you if you'd

53:

Feel free to leave a message below. I value all feedback, so if I'm doing something wrong, doing something you disagree with (even if it is consistent with policy), or even if it is just something you think I could be doing better, please let me know

204: 184: 3899:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

3617:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

386:"Hindu terrorism" is still under "religious terrorism", not only "religious violence" under "religious terrorism". Anyways, I'll take a look thru their talkpages, as it really is a big mess. You've been in multiple dead-end discussions! 1613:

Sorry for the delay. It's not a big deal. We all started on Knowledge (XXG) the same way, so we're all here to work together on improving the project. I think you've got faster and more detailed answers already, so just keep in mind to

571:

Re, N: Hehe, sometimes I reply fast from my phone and fail to re-read. That was actually personal activities regarding my research. It was approved by my University and is available in the Library, even though my instructor was Atheist

1544:

is the only particular case where he asked an individual editor to participate. My comment was largely made to discourage any further individual "invitations". To maintain balance in the conversation, I also notified one other editor,

1875:

removed the civil war section and merged things about it in Post independence Sri Lankan section complaining about the style in which the civil war section.But when I included the civil war section again with the things mentioned by

1713: 3989: 360:

Of course I've always respected your note, but we can't make research or provide sources to justify/unjustify content on a NAV template. I won't revert you, but keep in mind that the article needs to be fixed immediately/soonest

743:

lol - My version has a lovely strong aqualine nose which gives it respect and an air of... lets face it, I just wanted something that was different lol. I do have some others though: Sleeping ¦¬( and indifference ¦¬| and feline

4009: 526:

N: On your user page I see "I continually point out to the versus that they ignore, or don't understand . . ." -- do you want "point out the verses" rather than "versus" there? Sorry if I'm missing the point. -- Thanks --

2295:

now, however, have a new feature - a news feed. The way this works is by the project having a news page (which can be found [[WP:WikiProject Barnstar Awarding/News|here). Users then place the following on their talk page

2861: 4004: 4115: 3927: 3621:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

2803: 2307:

We hope that you will help support this new feature and will add the template to your user space. Now this feature is in place, messages adressed to the whole WikiProject will no longer be individualy delivered.

3704:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 932:, you'll understand that you can't take one-side of the story. I fixed the paragraph, based on mentioning both stories on the existing source and your source. Any questions? I can bring the whole text here... 2799: 1450:

critical and thoughtful speech in Knowledge (XXG), mostly because I see this as a useful thing for some people to work out their thoughts and feelings on an issue before they take it anywhere more public.

3243: 2922: 3994: 1679:

I just can't seem to find the discussion that was on that topic, but I'll keep looking. There's a group of editors that are working on clarifying the Arabic terms and merging what needs to be merged.

4099:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3911:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3815:

that reached a point where an RfC is being formulated about mentioning Islam in the lead paragraph. Would you please give us your opinion about how Islam should be mentioned, if at all? Many thanks.

2868: 2024: 1356: 2918: 2020: 1352: 1026:. Actually, key cities doesn't even mean major cities "diplomatically", but key areas "geographically" (military-wise). Take care and stay out of trouble... I'm watching you jkjk, see ya around 3853: 3845: 2656: 3247: 2926: 4158: 2652: 2028: 1360: 3251: 2930: 2747: 2588: 2581: 2352: 1943:

for their contributions, including a brand new one for the single largest wikified article! If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!

4061: 4054: 3367: 3350: 3304: 3189: 3172: 2032: 1364: 1077:

is not being distorted by original research. I have already answered you objection a long time ago, and you should at least respond on the talk page before you revert edits, thanks.

2699: 2660: 2305:

News will then be updated on your talk page (or anywhere else you decided to place this template). Please note that the new messages template will not be shown as news is updated.

1948: 1300: 1092:

What has your source, in the talkpage, have do with my revert. I reverted your unjustified removal of well-sourced material, based on your opinion from some other source. Anyways,

1002:(gateway to west from east Libya). There is a reason the word stalemate is used so much. In any case lets leave it be as it is and cool our heads for a while. Ok mate? See ya! ;) 4189: 659:. I do not assume that you want your comments moved, but have copied them there as well so that you may delete your own comment knowing it is already archived if you so wish :¬) 2533: 4184: 3284: 3276: 3216: 2995: 2958: 2941: 2664: 2339: 905:

of editors who are trying to remove from the article sourced information and phrase things to their own POV because I am trying to keep up the neutrality of Knowledge (XXG).

327:

is not religious in the slightest. Actually, that's what those of us working on the article have been trying so carefully to keep away from, even adding a line at the top of

3338: 3160: 1936: 3239: 2936: 2914: 2686: 2678: 2625: 1784: 1732: 1270: 970:

I don't care about the paragraph, but care about insistent denials. Did I ever dispute your source? NO! Did I remove it? NO! Here's the sentence from the first source: "

3783:

I created a page late last year that has not been assessed yet. Since you are an experienced active user within the project, if you could spare a few moments to assess

3468: 3059: 2520: 2239:

and I are putting together a task force for experienced Wikipedians who might be interested in monitoring the queue and responding to the feedback: details are here at

2016: 1348: 690:

I can't understand why Mrs Thatcher didn't kill Gaddafi 25 years ago when he was openly arming the IRA, as well as many other terrorist organizations all over the world

2490:, I have added my comments, if you agree or disagree with me and come out with your comments or want to participate in the discussion with other editors, please do so. 3342: 3289: 3258: 3164: 3063: 2999: 2946: 2690: 2524: 2343: 2043: 1940: 1375: 1274: 4016: 2648: 576:. She liked it tho. Anyways, again, those are personal statements that I don't mix with my Knowledge (XXG) editing. I'm always open about it off-Knowledge (XXG). 3614: 3262: 2047: 1379: 479: 120: 3658: 3603: 3501: 2755: 674:

Just a note, hatting/collapsing is the preferred method in Talk pages, but generally we just let what others say in Talk pages stand as it was written. --

2105:. I had an error in the template one-day and fixed most of them, but I probably have one more left out there. Although, the email-welcoming was correct. 2558: 2235:, a queue that updates in real time with feedback and editing questions from new registered contributors who have attempted to make at least one edit. 1638:. Please try to avoid marking re-wording and clarification edits with minor, although others might have a different opinion on that. Happy editing... 2563:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

482:

for the above users. I've not done this before - hopefully I have provided enough evidence. You are welcome to comment/provide additional evidence.--

126: 3288:. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog by over seven hundred articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive 900:

I didn't remove sourced material, I removed what wasn't in the source provided. Big difference. There was no mention in this particular source of

3341:. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by hundreds of articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive 3163:. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by hundreds of articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive 2231:

project, I thought I'd give you a heads-up about a new way you can help/mentor newbies on en.wiki: we've recently released a feature called the

2523:. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 1,300 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive 2342:. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 1,000 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive 1939:. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 1,000 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive 1273:. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 1,000 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive 3654: 3497: 3062:. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 500 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive 2998:. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 500 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive 2945:

starts in a couple of days. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive

4142: 1549:; any other participants are likely to come from the regular talkpage notices. Thanks for taking time to comment on the new Category issue. 688:

I assume that you saw the policy above. Almost all the comments by this user ain't related to the talkpage, nor discussion, like this one: "

218: 4129: 3941: 3867: 3729: 3375: 1593:

You commented concerning my edit of a page. As you know I am new and just finding my feet my article which I have extensively corrected is

85: 3852:. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more 2732: 3563: 2567: 1402: 3490:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

2232: 35:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. 2595: 850:

Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/User:Drnhawkins/Moses and the Israelites served Amenemhet III during the 12th dynasty of Egypt

808: 3135: 140: 4030: 2798:(DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are 1208: 649: 145: 71: 1182: 928:, when you removed that half-of-the-story and added another half from another source to push your-own conclusion. If you re-read 115: 27: 4125: 3937: 3863: 3725: 3371: 2452:" and since the the editors who voted "Disagree" after RFC never turned back for discussion with who voted "Agree" even after 1799: 1747: 1289: 4108: 3920: 3464: 3417: 3363: 3185: 2893: 2554: 2369: 2240: 2068: 1991: 1965: 1324: 3651:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3494:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2564: 1187: 656: 106: 2754:

You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active member of the wikify project. To update your status, go

2084:

Hi, I haven't checked whether this happened more than once, but you left the wrong newbie user name in the welcome message

3979: 3784: 268:

Not to interrupt your other editing but I really would like it if you could help out with edits to the following pages:

3716:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

3607: 4120: 3932: 3721: 239: 235: 231: 3491: 3345:

for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!

3167:

for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!

3066:

for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!

3002:

for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!

2949:

for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!

1277:

for their contributions! If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!

3292:

for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!

2693:

for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!

717:. I did that after the above editor reverted my removal, but I'll consider archiving instead (if needed). Nice nose 3643:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2809: 2689:. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive 2092: 150: 3476: 3448: 3425: 2405: 1546: 1416:

Oh lovely, thanks for diving here too. Hmmm, I feel sorry that the selfish admins poorly block you instead of me

1401:

If you have issues reading and or understanding text i dont think you should be editing! Just a word of advice!

443: 248: 190: 164: 328: 4096: 4022:

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

3908: 2248: 2177:

FYI: In a recent RfC for Sri Lanka, you wrote ".. ethical conflict..". Did you mean "ethnic conflict"? --

1884:

and ]don't agree with that.They just don't want anyone to know about the ethnic conflict and civil war in SL(

293:

The prophet pages are being forsaken while they are hugely important; your help would be wonderful! I edited

4036:(user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings. 3755: 3748: 2365: 2064: 1961: 1406: 302: 298: 2550: 2228: 1421: 972:

The attempt by Qaddafi to retake rebel territory has “fallen apart” as opposition forces capture key cities

804: 435: 3957: 2495: 2469: 2429: 2142: 1889: 1849: 812: 416: 349: 3717: 96: 3123: 3098: 3040: 2244: 2130: 2089: 1881: 1877: 1872: 1868: 1553: 1204: 1055: 282: 272: 196: 4019:

that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

3744: 854:

Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/User:Drnhawkins/An alternative view of the 3rd dynasty of Egypt

111: 4161:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.

3138:. Thanks for editing Knowledge (XXG) and I look forward to working with you! 14:19, 26 May 2013 (UTC) 3472: 3444: 3421: 3391: 3312: 3197: 3075: 2975: 2768: 2715: 2607: 861: 755: 664: 645: 439: 287: 4083: 3895: 3877: 3693: 3684: 3223: 3034: 3025: 2900: 2632: 2000: 1332: 306: 3127: 2395:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

2182: 2134: 1900:

Unfortunately, I won't be as-active for quite some time. I have a pretty exhausted period-of-life.

1795: 1766: 1743: 1508: 1285: 1125: 1082: 608: 310: 4092: 3904: 3762: 3713: 3697: 335:

is incorrect and promoting a falsehood. Saffron/Hindu terrorism has absolutely nothing to do with

4166: 3816: 3571: 3398: 558: 532: 332: 254: 169: 925: 478:

Well spotted on the previous SPI. I'm glad I'm not going mad with paranoia! I have opened a new

4041: 3766: 3674: 3548: 3029:, a WikiProject and resource for Knowledge (XXG) cleanup listings, information and discussion. 2491: 2465: 2444: 2425: 2314: 2236: 2138: 1885: 1845: 1007: 958: 910: 411: 344: 92: 4104: 3916: 3709: 3701: 1623: 1615: 1074: 929: 3820: 2193: 1669: 1603: 1550: 1200: 1051: 250: 192: 166: 4107:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4100: 3919:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3912: 3712:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3705: 3300: 3083: 2979: 2776: 1627: 1093: 4154: 3308: 3193: 3110: 3071: 2971: 2764: 2740: 2711: 2603: 1463: 1175: 857: 751: 679: 660: 484: 203: 183: 3473:

One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee!

2795: 2072: 1619: 1117: 4000:"Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages 3977:

message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the

875:. I didn't wanna discourage the editor on my summary, I would of said "IT'S AWFULLLLL". 3420:

that the February drive has been started. Better late than never! Come on, sign up! :)

2178: 1788: 1736: 1504: 1278: 1121: 1078: 605: 331:

to explain that it is not for religious terrorism articles. Putting it in that spot on

324: 1075:

Talk:Jihad#Rules of war according to Islamic law in disharmony with BBC's strict rules

4178: 4162: 3849: 3665:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

3629: 3567: 3539:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

3395: 1680: 554: 528: 3848:, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the 3838: 3670: 3666: 3544: 3540: 3509: 2802:, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to 2457: 2415: 2310: 2259: 2200: 2153: 2106: 1901: 1813: 1780: 1728: 1684: 1639: 1635: 1594: 1569: 1519: 1479: 1425: 1235: 1144: 1097: 1027: 1003: 975: 954: 933: 906: 876: 824: 769: 721: 693: 620: 580: 498: 454: 387: 366: 217: 67: 4074: 3886: 1812:

Thank you... I wish I had time to work on more (crazy August)... maybe next time.

648:

Just wanted to remind you of the policy on other people's article-talk page posts

3566:

has been tagged as a container (subcats only). Please consider a subcat. Thanks,

2589:

Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Islam-related_articles#Qur.27an_and_Primary_Source

2433: 1135:

I guess you forgot what the whole talkpage is about, which was pointed to you by

3788: 1864: 1665: 1599: 343:, which is political nationalism. I am going to revert you on the template now. 1664:

how to convey this to others so a succinct encyclopaedic entry can be achieved.

1230:, so please dump your thoughts on the proposal, or erase it all if necessarily 453:

Good... It's still your opinion tho. Oh, and I haven't asked for a ban, silly.

3808: 3644: 3598: 3582: 3531: 3515: 3091:

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!

1459: 675: 20: 3985:

that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

3452: 2736:

concerning the future of wikification, including possible deprecation of the

1540:

You had asked about the specifics of the canvassing, and as far as I'm aware

4159:

Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 4#Final Testament

3527: 3366:. To stop receiving messages from WikiProject Wikify, remove your name from 3188:. To stop receiving messages from WikiProject Wikify, remove your name from 1860: 1841: 1169: 277: 3331: 3153: 2513: 2332: 1929: 1263: 3648: 3624: 340: 336: 4149: 4111:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3923:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3445:

Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding...

3422:

Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding...

1712: 252: 168: 3700:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

3523: 3519: 3015: 747:

Have you seen the image at the bottom right of my userpage (from 1881)?

740: 194: 3439: 997:

more than a few thousand people. Wouldn't call that cities. As far as

3131: 294: 4170: 4133: 4047: 3945: 3871: 3824: 3797: 3770: 3733: 3678: 3633: 3575: 3552: 3480: 3429: 3406: 3379: 3337: