User talk:Ajnem - Knowledge (XXG)

1674:

unblock you. Please note that continuing to discuss legal action after an unblock will lead to an immediate and permanent reblocking. Either take action and leave Knowledge (XXG), or hold your own counsel and edit here freely. What you can't do is edit here while at the same time discussing what legal action you might or might not take. This is NOT a demand that you never take legal action against Knowledge (XXG), nor that you promise never to do so as a condition of unblocking. All you have to stop is the discussion of possible action, which has a chilling effect on discussion here. If you do decide to respond to this message please make it short and to the point. One sentence (based on my second sentence here) should suffice. If you can't make your reply short and sweet, I probably won't be able to unblock.

919:

them, and of course they have to include the Settlements. In Switzerland, a neutral country which hasn't seen any foreign soldiers since the time of Napoleon, we have the most sophisticated infrastructure for it, Sweden, another neutral country has a different system but no less sophisticated. In Israel, you use Scotch tape, or those who are smart and really know about Arabs and Muslims just go to Jerusalem for shelter, bargaining that no Arab leader will dare to attack Jerusalem because of the Muslim Holy Sites. But then, I don't kow how holy they are for Syrian Alawites. But the missiles haven't arrived yet. However, the question wether the PA is included is a good one. You want to bet?

1597:

legal action - and that's precisely the sort of thing the policy is intended to prevent. Now, if your response is "I'm not suing wikipedia, nor anyone on wikipedia, and have no plans to do so." then great - you can be unblocked and we move on with our lives. If your response is "I'm not suing wikipedia, but might later on." then we still have a problem. As for the last paragraph of your unblock request, I think you're overthinking it. You do not have the right to edit wikipedia. Rather, you are permitted to edit wikipedia so long as you do so in compliance with its policies and procedures. One of these is

1159:, and on his own talk page of all places? Your blocking me imo quite obviously is due to a misunderstanding. My guess is that it is due to the fact that the blocking administrator didn't know or didn't take into consideration that the discussion I refered to was about a legal offence actionable in court (according to European law, though probably not in the US), and therefore misunderstood my post as a threat to take legal action, when in fact taking legal action in the matter is not what I think should be done. But I may not be the best judge of that. 2564:, no one nearly banned you, though you could have gotten blocked for pure vandalism. If you had made yourself aware of Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines you'd have learned that the person who started the page has no authority to blank it. Now, I don't know how many more inappropriate pages you want to raise this on, but all of it tells me you still have not read the appropriate guidelines. Besides, this editor hasn't edited Knowledge (XXG) in over a decade, so you probably won't get an answer from them anyway. 1163:

as I would like to. But I would not want to become the first Wikipedian ever to be blocked for allegedly having successfully “coerced” Jimmy Wales into doing something he didn't want to do – and something as natural as being civil enough to answer a simple question into the bargain. So please unblock me and make sure the block doesn't show in my block log, and let's all forget it ever happened, as this is embarassing, but everybody makes mistakes. Thank you,

466: 633: 2321: 373: 1407: 1232: 1023: 963: 2252: 2190: 1350:

lawyer rather than editing Knowledge (XXG) directly. That's a very clear Knowledge (XXG) policy, and I don't have the right to lift a block while your court case is still outstanding. No administrator does. Please, feel free to request unblocking again after your case is finished, or if you have changed your mind about taking legal action, say so

1323:

take too much for granted. But I think I can count on it that even if it hasn't been checked with what I called ‘the proper authorities’ so far, it will be, before my request (see my first request) to be unblocked is declined a second time. After all, I'm being blocked because you claim that I “threatened”, if not “coerced” Jimmy Wales into making a

2494:

Hello :) I am writing my MA dissertation on Knowledge (XXG) Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. My dissertation will look at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in

1743:

I also observe that three other admins above saw your words as a legal threat. I won't argue semantics over the word "threat" except to say that I don't view the term in a negative way. You see, any discussion of legal action against Knowledge (XXG), whether speculative or not, constitutes a "threat"

1735:

Hello, I received email from you asking if the unblock rationale in your block log could be changed to something to the effect of "withdrew comments suggestive of planned legal action". I'm replying here because someone else may have a solution. I could be wrong, but I simply don't know of any way to

1673:

You can threaten or engage in legal action against Knowledge (XXG), or you can be an active Knowledge (XXG) editor, but not both at the same time. If you can confirm here that you understand this, and that you withdraw any comments that may have lead people to believe legal action was planned, I will

918:

Hello. As far as I see from the sources you give, it's just “a plan for a mass evacuation in the event of a missile attack” based on existing plans for evacuations in other cases of emmergencies such as earthquakes. What's the fuss? It's about time Israel makes such plans, every developed country has

304:

Not at the disabled, at women, and it wasn't my comment. I work in a mixed workplace. I showed the photo to a female ultra-Orthodox Jewish co-worker (who, btw, has a very weird sense of humor). Understand that the Hebrew word 'disabled' comes from the root also meaning 'limited'. My co-worker said

1816:

Should you wake up at night sometime in the near future with a flash of inspiration how to change a logged rationale, please feel free to try it on my block log. But it's no problem anymore, the whole uproar was my fault, and I can assume the responsability for my actions. What counts is the way you

1349:

You made it clear that you will be taking Knowledge (XXG) to court. That's fine- you have a legal right to do that- but until your case is fully resolved, or you have unambiguously withdrawn it, it's necessary for you to stay off of Knowledge (XXG), and let your lawyer communicate with Wikimedia's

1162:

If the phrasing of my questions has been perceived as offensiv, I sincerely regret it and apologize, to Jimbo in particular, but I can assure you that no offence, let alone threat or coersion was intended. Not beeing a native English speaker, I sometimes may not be able to express myself as clearly

850:

the quotation-mark-outposts get their moniker from: the ones errected by Israelis on land which belongs to Palestinians. If the latter is added, one sentence mentioning that Palestinians are copying the Jews by using caravans is all that's needed. It's an entirely different issue, has nothing to do

1812:

Hello Amatulić, thank you for showing some compassion for my idiosyncrasy. I had no idea that it would pose a technically unsolvable problem to change the rationale, not having any insight into what you guys do behind the scene. It's only the block log that worries me, not my talk page; most on it

719:

It wasn't meant to be helpful, so perhaps I shouldn't have phrased it as advice. Let me rephrase it as an instruction: Don't tell anyone they must be logged into an account to edit Knowledge (XXG), however badly you think they are behaving. You can't insist that people obey rules that don't exist.

1762:

kind of fool in my eyes, if it says in my blocklog that I'm making legal threats on Jimmy Wales talkpage. I suppose that there are users who might do that, but I would not want to be in that category. If somebody comes up with a solution, that would be great, but if not, thank you all for trying,

1761:

Thank you, Amatulić, for taking the trouble of trying to solve my problem. If it is technically not feasible to just change the unblock rationale without adding others, then please don't bother any more. It is not a matter of life and death, it's just that it makes me look like the worst possible

1596:

I'm very sorry, but you lost me at "Overzealous, blocking happy Wikipedian...". If the block was incorrect, you'd already be unblocked. Your initial comment seemed to indicate that Jimbo's response would dictate whether you took legal action, and that the nature of his response could prevent that

1322:

defines blocks, I would like to be sure that I interpret the block correctly. Seeing that it took twenty minutes to review my request and decline it, I presume that it was taken up with ‘the proper authorities’, and not just decided by one administrator who happened to see it. But I don't want to

262:

Kudos for the great pic you put in Mehadrin Bus lines, though it took me several clicks to see it in high resolution to be able to read the notice for myself. Just between you and me, if women in some communities are considered to be people with 'mugbaluyot', then I guess they are most certainly

27:

make sense and is an improvement, I don't understand why you remove the reference to the 2007 elections. This is surely noteworthy, and it is quite normal in an article on a city to include information on the respective strengths of the political parties, though admitedly, I don't understand why

1550:

As far as the future is concerned, you cannot possibly expect me to state that I'll never be “taking any legal action in the future”. If that was the condition on which users can edit Knowledge (XXG), you would have to get that statement from every user when s/he registers, if not from everyone

1989:

If someone is unfamiliar with the term, then they can click on the link to the article. Just because the New York Times uses a term does not make it any less offensive. As you can see from the WikiProject Judaism talk page, the consensus on Knowledge (XXG) is to use the term 'Haredi' instead of

1783:

Eventually this talk page will grow to the point where you need to trim it down, and you can trim it now if you like. But don't just trim it, archive it. That way there's always a record you can link to if anyone ever misunderstands the background behind what happened. A good auto archiver is

672:

Please discontinue deleting edits on this article. You are engaging in an editing war and are ignoring sources. An edit from "writer" to "screenwriter & author" was made to reason with your comment but deleting the edits is vandelism. This is your last warning before an admin needs to get

691:

includes a request by you to another editor to log in before giving anyone advice. This is absolutely not appropriate advice. WP is the encyclopaedia anyone can edit; there is no requirement to log in or have an account to be allowed to take part in any normal editing activity.

1882:

I have replied on Talk:Israeli settlement. In the future please bring up general Israel-related discussions on Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Israel, otherwise we can only stumble upon the discussions in individual articles if we watch them, which many of us do not. Cheers,

1736:

edit an unblock rationale that has already been logged. While an admin can re-block an already-blocked user with a different rationale (which adds a new block entry in the log, rather than replacing the previous one), I see no way to "re-unblock" someone who is not blocked.

1850:

You remind me that my own block log embarrasses me also, making me look incompetent (it shows me blocking myself for "disruptive editing" when I meant to block someone else). But the block log is what it is. Once something gets logged in it, there's nothing I can do about

1317:

Well guys, I'm not going to fight. If you want me out of Knowledge (XXG), I wont overstay my welcome. But I do request to be unblocked a second time, as I don't want to make the same mistake twice. Not being blocked “to prevent damage or disruption to Knowledge (XXG)”, as

1146:

You cannot seriously believe that I, a user you probably have never even heard of, could make Jimmy Wales give an assessment after he had not bothered to give it earlier, most likely because it didn't occur to him that I or anybody else was expecting him to, by using

1623:. Now that really is serious stuff, it coming from Jimmy Wales! Is he to be blocked, because he seems to be thinking about legal action and not keeping his thoughts to himself? And please, do not psychoanalyse me. There is a Knowledge (XXG) policy which says to 878:

As an Israeli I think it would be bad for me to write something about evacuation plan in the west bank without a POV on the subject, I've contacted you as one of the evacuation areas is Arial and it would be hard to write something that would not look POV.

733:

I wish you were giving instructions everywhere where instructions are needed, and by the way, I didn't tell anybody that he “must be logged into an account to edit Knowledge (XXG)” or “insist” he do so, but semantics aside, it's still not helpful. Cheers,

1354:- a statement such as, 'I have not taken any legal action against Knowledge (XXG) or anyone on Knowledge (XXG), and I have no intention of taking any legal action in the future,' for example. For more information about this policy, you can read 93:

I've also removed your addition of "male" describing historians of physics who reject the "collaboration" thesis. The rejection is not confined to male historians of physics, as I point out in another item on the Mileva Maric discussion page.

1653:

is the Wikimedia Foundation's General Counsel - and the person you'd talk to about possible legal actions involving the German Knowledge (XXG) or its users. He didn't say "Stop going on about this or we'll take it to court" (which

1687:

Kim Dent-Brown, I understand what you explained in your first sentence, as well as your further explanations, and I withdraw any comments that may have lead people to believe legal action was planned and apologize to everybody.

1739:

I suppose I could re-block you and then unblock you again to create a new unblocked entry with the changed rationale, but then your block log would fill up with more entries, which I suspect wouldn't be acceptable to you.

174:

An editor must not perform more than one revert on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a

2585: 2455:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2400:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1744:

in the sense of being a possibility. Such discussions are never to be aired in public, so blocking is a way to prevent further public discussion. No bad faith was implied by that word in the unblock rationale. ~

472: 465: 1187:

Am I to understand that your putting above into your archiv not bothering to answer my post or my e-mail means that you don't think it necessary to take any action, and that you want me to take it to court?

1780:

If it's any consolation, the block log doesn't mention Jimmy Wales or give any detail at all. And the drama on this talk page can be removed and archived, so no one will see it when coming to this page.

1972:. "Haredi" is not understood by anybody outside the Jewish world, and not even by everybody inside it. "Ultra-Orthodox" is not offensive, it is what reliable sources call it (e.g. the New York Times 1953: 944: 831:

Have you encountered a different terms ? I think we should add the legal status as with the Israeli outposts (i.e. illegal by Israel law, illigal by International laws , and disputed by the EU)

1620:

I don't want to be cynical, but if there is a “legal threat” on Jimbo's talk page, it is Jimbo's post, saying: “If legal action is contemplated, then a chat with Geoff Brigham may be useful...”

846:“Outposts” when they are Palestinian are usually put in quotation marks, and it is an Israeli term. It imo cannot be used in the West Bank article, as there is nothing in the article about the 1500:. In my personal opinion it is not a matter which should go to court, as that might hurt Knowledge (XXG), which evidently is involved, otherwise I would not have bothered Jimmy Wales with it. 2005:

Yes, but the Rubaskins are not referred to as haredim in sources, sorry. And I dont think that they have ever complained or felt offended, but just out of curiosity, who says it's offensive?

1601:, which requires parties to active or pending litigation to not edit the project. Your statement on Jimbo's talk page seemed to violate that policy, and you were rightly blocked as a result. 112:

This is just to let you know I have responded to your and Beeback's comments on the Mileva Maric talk page, and to invite you to reply to the specific points I have made in response to yours.

851:

with international law (4th Geneva Convention), but is an issue of building permits which are practically unobtainable for Palestinians and projects that benefit Palestinians in Area C

65:

Hello Ajnem. You're quite right, you didn't remove the reference. Sorry about that. My only excuse was it was late and I clearly couldn't see what was there in front of me. Oops!

2495:

the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article.

645:

Ajnem, please accept this barnstar as a token of appreciation for all your contributions, and in honor of recently making your 1,000th edit to articles on English Knowledge (XXG).

411: 491:

Hi Ajnem. You can't change the article on Steve Greenberg to say that he's an Orthodox rabbi. That's a matter of dispute, and putting one view in the lede is a violation of

1555:. It goes without saying that I can only speak for myself, not for others. So please unblock me, and I'd appreciate it, if the block didn't show in the block log. Thank you, 2325: 1112:

about his opinion concerning the action to be taken regarding an actionable offence which, initiated by me, had been discussed on his talk page earlier during several days

940: 761: 135: 1551:

before an edit is saved. This clearly is not Knowledge (XXG) policy. And more likely than not, there would be no Knowledge (XXG) if it were. But what I can promise is that

1975:), however, it is a misnomer, but not because of the "ultra", but because of the "Orthodox". But that's another story. So let's leave the ultra-Orthodox as it is. Cheers, 1189:" sounds exactly like a threat of legal action (what else?) and I don't see a retraction, which should be very simple and leave no other possible interpretations. 798: 1952:

The consensus regarding use of the term 'Ultra-Orthodox' is that the term 'Haredi' is preferred due to the offensive nature of the term 'Ultra-Orthodox'. See

1398:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

1223:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

2110: 2069: 90:

I have amended the passage on Abram Joffe that you recently changed. You'll find the reasons spelled out in detail on the Mileva Maric discussion page.

51:

hello, as far as i see, i did not "remove the reference to the 2007 elections." but you are right, it has to be moved from "Demography" to "Politics".--

1658:

be a legal threat), he said, essentially, that you might want to talk to this guy, since he handles that sort of thing (which is not a legal threat).

2518:

Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary and anonymous. There are no foreseeable risks nor benefits to you associated with this project.

1553:

I'll notify Knowledge (XXG), or rather the Wikimedia Foundation, should I ever take legal action against Knowledge (XXG) or another of its projects

305:(in Hebrew) that with all the limitations placed on her (by her community), she should be allowed to sit in the front seat according to the sign!-- 2510: 227: 2059: 1540:“Ajnem has been blocked indefinitely or until such time as they can clarify on their talk page about that they are not thinking of legal action” 1138:“Ajnem has been blocked indefinitely or until such time as they can clarify on their talk page about that they are not thinking of legal action” 1854:

Carry on, and know that the community will judge you by how you conduct yourself overall, not by an isolated misunderstanding from the past. ~

1383: 1208: 998: 2106: 2065: 674: 2593: 2150: 2055: 1991: 2480: 2425: 1973: 903: 832: 1901:. I just edited the first mention of criminal charges down to its essence in the top section, so as not to have so much repetition. best, 2146: 2126: 2099:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

1664: 1607: 1442: 1272: 1063: 803: 2122: 1487:

Thank you FisherQueen for giving me a civil explanation for the block. As I have stated earlier, this is a misunderstanding. I have

1368: 1124:

had come to the conclusion that I was making a “legal threat” and blocked me, and in a practically inexistent discussion afterwards

557: 479: 2589: 2476: 2421: 2062:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1509:) which he aswered, obviously not perceiving it as a threat, let alone an announcement that I was going to take legal action: 2103:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 430:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

1844: 1624: 1327:. Therefore I'll assume that if you keep me blocked for keeps, it will be as a result of what he suggested, not against it. 982: 1577:

Ajnem met the requirements in the previously denied unblock request by withdrawing the legal threat in statements below. ~

168:. Without having warned you first, Administrators are unlikely to take action; so please review Knowledge (XXG) policy at 978: 379: 1505:“Am I to understand that ... you don't think it necessary to take any action, and that you want me to take it to court?” 177:

Take this message not as a personal insult but as constructive criticism and endeavor to be more careful in the future.—

143: 2467:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

2412:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

1319: 1245: 1036: 970: 705:

Yep, but this, dear Kim Dent-Brown is not very helpful advice either – not under the circumstances. But thanks anyway,

164:

may constitute a violation of the 1RR restriction. While they appear to be in good faith, they are also symptomatic of

2472: 2417: 1935: 1906: 1437: 1267: 1058: 217: 2100: 1414: 1239: 1030: 2046:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1244:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

1035:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

504: 431: 417: 2019:

It's not about whether they specifically felt offended, but whether the term in general is considered offensive.

678: 514:

So sorry, but all sources say that he is an Orthodox rabbi, or do you have any reliable sources to the contrary?

2338: 1712: 1680: 1156: 1125: 765: 726: 698: 542: 447: 220:), see apology at my Talk page for the extended delay in replying. On to the diffs that prompted the reminder: 1496:

that I will only take ‘the matter in question’ – which is not Knowledge (XXG) – to court on Jimmy Wales say so

1120:, he answered my question quite pomptly, which I thank him for. Before he had the time to answer my question, 907: 836: 787:

Please cease making unfounded accusations about other editors' motives as you have done at Talk:Jack Abramoff

2020: 652: 2275:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

2213:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

1788:

which is easy to set up simply by creating a tag at the top of your talk page according to the directions. ~

817: 282:; he took the picture, uploaded it and translated the Hebrew text into English. All I did, was move it from 192:

Hello Biosketch, don't know what you are referring to. Maybe you want to explain, what it is you object to?

139: 899: 1931: 1902: 807: 372: 2468: 2413: 2344: 2499: 1364: 648: 553: 384: 2353: 2335: 1003:

You are not allowed to edit Knowledge (XXG) while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

427: 2305: 2241: 1968:

Not in the U.S., let alone in other countries outside Israel. But if you prefer, we can change it to

885: 2444: 2435: 2389: 2380: 1544:

on Jimbo's talk page. I don't want to get personal, but somebody else did mention “a pink elephant”

548:

tag. Would you please give more detail about which part of the text is doubtful to you? Thanks, --

241: 178: 2581: 2561: 2546: 2264: 2027: 1998: 1960: 1707: 1675: 1456: 1286: 1077: 721: 693: 440: 279: 245: 182: 70: 41: 2464: 2448: 2409: 2393: 2356: 2332: 1813:

are disambiguation link notification I should remove anyway, but I'll start an archive eventually.

2550: 2531: 2370: 1860: 1794: 1750: 1583: 594: 587: 400: 391: 287: 119: 102: 2232:

The organization works with the Israeli education ministry and Israeli schools in order to bring

1598: 1355: 2174: 2085: 1659: 1650: 1602: 773: 354: 310: 268: 2460: 2452: 2405: 2397: 2295:. The term has been in use since at least as early as 1997,<ref name="RabbiLetterNYT": --> 492: 2569: 2051: 1392: 1359: 1217: 1194: 988: 891: 888: 764:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic

598: 549: 2463:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2456: 2408:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2401: 1817:

reacted to my request – and that puts you on top of my list of “decent admins”. Thank you,

169: 165: 2301: 2256: 2237: 2194: 1990:'Ultra-Orthodox'. If you wish to challenge that consensus, please direct your comments to 1113: 896:

One thing I didn't get if the PA is also in that project (didn't find anything at ma'an)

847: 161: 2347: 939:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at

760:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at

632: 134:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at

2202: 2024: 1995: 1957: 1538:. It was all made up by an overzealous, blocking happy Wikipedian who posts stuff like 1136:, no less. Promptly posted on Jimbo's talk page by Dmcq, the cryptical sentence reads: 1012: 952: 855: 500: 66: 37: 1536:

I have not taken any legal action against Knowledge (XXG) or anyone on Knowledge (XXG)

828:

at least in places like Haaretz , ynetnews ,greenNow , Regavim and few other sources.

2527: 2366: 2165:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2076:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2047: 1898: 1884: 1855: 1789: 1785: 1745: 1703: 1578: 874:

Would you mind starting an article about the Israeli Guest Hotel evacuation project ?

666: 115: 98: 421: 2490:

Knowledge (XXG) Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict...please fill out my survey?

2170: 2166: 2081: 2077: 769: 350: 306: 264: 1843:

Admins are rarely appreciated, so I thank you for your comment. I try to abide by

824:

I've added some notes about the use of the term from 2005, I witnessed the use of

2565: 2157: 2142: 1190: 766:

Jack Abramoff, Talk:Jack Abramoff; users: 199.209.144.218, 76.73.168.89, Eelnire

414:.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 852: 2006: 1976: 1917: 1818: 1763: 1689: 1628: 1588: 1564: 1556: 1420: 1373: 1336: 1328: 1250: 1198: 1172: 1164: 1041: 1016: 956: 920: 859: 735: 706: 609: 572: 515: 346: 320: 291: 207: 193: 157: 52: 2023:

from The Forward expresses a common sentiment regarding usage of the term. --

1108:

As I see, I was blocked indefinitely for asking Jimmy Wales on his talk page

981:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 2118: 1511:“I can barely read German and so I'm not the right person to ask about this” 1121: 1008: 948: 496: 2584:, fwiw, User:Ajnem hasn't edited since 2013, so they're unlikely to reply. 2545:

Please figure out a way to unmake it, I’ve attempted and nearly got banned

1621: 1545: 1542: 1513: 1507: 1498: 1140: 1117: 1109: 138:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --

405: 2586:

Knowledge (XXG):An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing

2328:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

943:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is

2451:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

2396:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

2133: 2268: 2206: 568: 2509:

I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out

2597: 2573: 2554: 2535: 2484: 2429: 2374: 2309: 2245: 2178: 2089: 2029: 2014: 2000: 1984: 1962: 1939: 1925: 1910: 1887: 1865: 1826: 1799: 1771: 1755: 1714: 1697: 1682: 1668: 1636: 1611: 928: 911: 886:

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/world/2012-06/11/c_131645773.htm

867: 840: 811: 777: 743: 728: 714: 700: 682: 656: 617: 602: 580: 561: 523: 508: 454: 358: 339: 328: 314: 299: 283: 272: 263:

allowed to sit in the first 2 seats at the front of the bus! lol

249: 201: 186: 147: 123: 106: 74: 60: 45: 1930:

Hey, I like a good arrest as much as the next guy. works for me,

473:

Talk:New York's 9th congressional district special election, 2011

160:, please consider that the frequency and nature of your edits at 24: 17: 2503: 1515:. (What I refer to as ‘the matter in question’ is in German.) 2362: 2341: 398:... that the recently deceased, long-time human rights figure 367: 290:. But frankly, I don't understand your punch at the disabled, 1916:

You did well, but I readded the arrest all the same. Cheers,

1492:“made it clear that will be taking Knowledge (XXG) to court” 1405: 1230: 1021: 961: 482:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

464: 396:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 23:

Whilst the rest of your recent amendment to the article on

1380:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

1205:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

892:

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4240696,00.html

889:

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4160526,00.html

2289:

as in the Jewish traditional bar mitzvah and bat mitzvah

1400:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1225:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2276: 2272: 2260: 2214: 2210: 2198: 2050:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1470: 1466: 1460: 1451: 1447: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1324: 1300: 1296: 1290: 1281: 1277: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1091: 1087: 1081: 1072: 1068: 1054: 1050: 1046: 793: 789: 688: 535: 232: 223: 2506:, where I will be posting my findings when I am done. 478:

Message added 17:38, 20 September 2011 (UTC). You can

2326:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

941:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

762:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

136:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

2541:

So you’re the one who made David Luchins a wiki page

1413:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

1238:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

1029:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

412:

Template:Did you know nominations/Jerome J. Shestack

410:

The nomination discussion and review may be seen at

2271:by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just 2209:by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just 647:Thanks again for helping improve the encyclopedia! 2365:articles for defamatory and libelous information. 2443:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 2388:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 2283:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: 2221:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: 2288:1589850552. {{ASIN|1589850556}}.</ref: --> 172:and in particular keep in mind the following: 2315:ANI Notice for your repeated disruptive edits 2095:Disambiguation link notification for August 1 1532:“lawyer communicate with Wikimedia's lawyer” 8: 2042:Disambiguation link notification for June 26 1494:. I have made it clear, or I thought I had, 945:Possible_legal_threat_on_Jimbo.27s_talk_page 820:should be changed to the term the media uses 240:Again, my apologies for replying this late.— 2498:For more information, you can check out my 979:making legal threats or taking legal action 408:attack during World War II by being Jewish? 36:section would be a more appropriate place. 935:Possible legal threat on Jimbo's talk page 2361:In addition, your targeting of Religious 388:was updated with a fact from the article 1128:, it was ‘decided’ that my question was 471:Hello, Ajnem. You have new messages at 2588:may or may not be of interest to you. 1116:. As can be seen on Jimbo's talk page 228:Israel's unilateral disengagement plan 2259:. I have automatically detected that 2197:. I have automatically detected that 802:about casting aspersions. Regards, -- 7: 2331:Which includes Falsifying sources, 1954:the talk page on Wikiproject Judaism 1897:Hi there. Thanks for your help with 2324:There is currently a discussion at 2226:organization called "Mibereshit". 1534:, or as you want me to phrase it: 14: 2469:review the candidates' statements 2414:review the candidates' statements 1845:Knowledge (XXG):Assume good faith 796:. You may find it useful to read 153:A reminder of the 1RR restriction 2319: 2250: 2188: 631: 371: 1992:WikiProject Judaism's talk page 1320:Knowledge (XXG):Blocking policy 2475:. For the Election committee, 2445:Arbitration Committee election 2436:ArbCom elections are now open! 2420:. For the Election committee, 2390:Arbitration Committee election 2381:ArbCom elections are now open! 1702:Graciously done Ajnem, thanks 235:– Removal of sources from lead 1: 2485:14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 2430:14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 1956:that discusses this issue. -- 524:16:29, 16 November 2011 (UTC) 509:16:14, 16 November 2011 (UTC) 278:Thanks, but you should thank 124:07:11, 11 November 2009 (UTC) 2598:08:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC) 2574:21:45, 3 November 2023 (UTC) 2555:20:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC) 1520:“court case ... outstanding” 593:thanks for working on this. 581:09:40, 7 February 2012 (UTC) 562:19:50, 6 February 2012 (UTC) 148:04:42, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 107:15:40, 5 November 2009 (UTC) 2471:and submit your choices on 2416:and submit your choices on 2310:11:32, 13 August 2013 (UTC) 1417:, who accepted the request. 1242:, who declined the request. 1033:, who declined the request. 455:16:02, 28 August 2011 (UTC) 359:10:28, 25 August 2011 (UTC) 349:in the "Photos" section -- 2614: 2477:MediaWiki message delivery 2422:MediaWiki message delivery 2246:16:18, 7 August 2013 (UTC) 2179:16:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC) 1888:09:44, 19 March 2013 (UTC) 1503:I asked Jimbo a question ( 997:, but you should read the 683:18:32, 23 April 2012 (UTC) 618:14:48, 28 March 2012 (UTC) 603:03:24, 28 March 2012 (UTC) 364:DYK for Jerome J. Shestack 202:15:04, 23 March 2011 (UTC) 187:18:59, 18 March 2011 (UTC) 32:. I would have thought a 2536:10:37, 30 July 2021 (UTC) 2156:added a link pointing to 2132:added a link pointing to 2090:11:07, 26 June 2013 (UTC) 2030:14:50, 26 June 2013 (UTC) 2015:14:21, 26 June 2013 (UTC) 2001:03:36, 26 June 2013 (UTC) 1985:10:53, 25 June 2013 (UTC) 1963:15:30, 24 June 2013 (UTC) 1940:17:26, 21 June 2013 (UTC) 1926:16:56, 21 June 2013 (UTC) 1911:12:08, 21 June 2013 (UTC) 1866:17:53, 31 July 2012 (UTC) 1827:09:59, 31 July 2012 (UTC) 1800:18:11, 30 July 2012 (UTC) 1772:17:09, 30 July 2012 (UTC) 1756:16:46, 30 July 2012 (UTC) 1715:18:16, 20 June 2012 (UTC) 1698:16:35, 20 June 2012 (UTC) 1683:15:57, 20 June 2012 (UTC) 1669:15:49, 20 June 2012 (UTC) 1637:15:24, 20 June 2012 (UTC) 1612:14:18, 20 June 2012 (UTC) 1589:18:11, 20 June 2012 (UTC) 1565:11:57, 20 June 2012 (UTC) 1528:“unambiguously withdrawn” 1518:FisherQueen, there is no 1384:guide to appealing blocks 1374:21:06, 19 June 2012 (UTC) 1337:16:03, 19 June 2012 (UTC) 1209:guide to appealing blocks 1199:11:38, 19 June 2012 (UTC) 1173:11:17, 19 June 2012 (UTC) 1017:10:55, 18 June 2012 (UTC) 999:guide to appealing blocks 957:10:42, 18 June 2012 (UTC) 934: 929:07:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 912:16:07, 11 June 2012 (UTC) 657:23:46, 9 April 2012 (UTC) 630: 567:The whole paragraph, see 345:Please see my comment on 329:10:11, 20 July 2011 (UTC) 315:10:00, 20 July 2011 (UTC) 300:07:54, 20 July 2011 (UTC) 273:18:50, 19 July 2011 (UTC) 250:17:03, 1 April 2011 (UTC) 226:– Removal of wikilink to 75:22:18, 15 July 2009 (UTC) 61:17:20, 15 July 2009 (UTC) 46:22:37, 14 July 2009 (UTC) 2375:06:36, 28 May 2014 (UTC) 2010: 1980: 1921: 1822: 1767: 1693: 1632: 1560: 1332: 1168: 924: 868:14:51, 1 June 2012 (UTC) 863: 841:08:12, 1 June 2012 (UTC) 739: 710: 613: 576: 519: 324: 295: 197: 2500:meta-wiki research page 2352:Attacking other users: 2277:my operator's talk page 2215:my operator's talk page 1706:for the prompt unbloc. 812:14:42, 8 May 2012 (UTC) 778:03:51, 3 May 2012 (UTC) 744:12:45, 7 May 2012 (UTC) 729:12:29, 7 May 2012 (UTC) 715:08:28, 7 May 2012 (UTC) 701:19:52, 4 May 2012 (UTC) 432:Did you know? talk page 1410: 1235: 1155:, as has been claimed 1130:“making legal threats” 1026: 966: 818:palestnian settelments 469: 286:, where he put it, to 2514:before 8 August 2021. 2449:Arbitration Committee 2394:Arbitration Committee 1457:change block settings 1409: 1287:change block settings 1234: 1078:change block settings 1025: 993:Your reason here ~~~~ 965: 639:The Original Barnstar 468: 2267:may have broken the 2205:may have broken the 2167:opt-out instructions 2101:disambiguation pages 2078:opt-out instructions 1649:That may be because 404:may have survived a 97:Best regards, Allen 2453:arbitration process 2398:arbitration process 2265:Bar and Bat Mitzvah 2151:fix with Dab solver 2127:fix with Dab solver 2060:fix with Dab solver 985:by adding the text 882:I'm referring to : 856:West Bank talk page 826:Palestinian outpost 624:A barnstar for you! 2590:Gråbergs Gråa Sång 2465:arbitration policy 2410:arbitration policy 2109:• Join us at the 2068:• Join us at the 1411: 1236: 1027: 967: 588:Alan Phillip Gross 480:remove this notice 470: 401:Jerome J. Shestack 392:Jerome J. Shestack 319:That's a thought, 288:Mehadrin bus lines 140:Steven J. Anderson 2511:this quick survey 2114: 2073: 1932:Shawn in Montreal 1903:Shawn in Montreal 1864: 1847:as best as I can. 1798: 1754: 1667: 1625:assume good faith 1610: 1587: 983:appeal this block 977:from editing for 902:comment added by 663: 662: 536:this omnibus edit 438: 437: 425: 2605: 2521:Thanks so much, 2323: 2322: 2294: 2254: 2253: 2231: 2192: 2191: 2147:check to confirm 2123:check to confirm 2104: 2063: 2056:check to confirm 2052:Computer analyst 1948:Rubashkin family 1858: 1792: 1748: 1710: 1678: 1663: 1606: 1581: 1524:“fully resolved” 1476: 1474: 1463: 1445: 1443:deleted contribs 1408: 1397: 1391: 1372: 1306: 1304: 1293: 1275: 1273:deleted contribs 1233: 1222: 1216: 1097: 1095: 1084: 1066: 1064:deleted contribs 1024: 996: 964: 914: 795: 791: 724: 696: 635: 628: 627: 547: 541: 483: 450: 415: 375: 368: 2613: 2612: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2543: 2534: 2492: 2473:the voting page 2439: 2418:the voting page 2384: 2339:WP:UNRESPONSIVE 2320: 2317: 2290: 2251: 2227: 2189: 2186: 2111:DPL WikiProject 2097: 2070:DPL WikiProject 2044: 1950: 1895: 1880: 1733: 1708: 1676: 1593: 1592: 1568: 1464: 1454: 1440: 1423: 1406: 1403: 1395: 1389: 1388:, then use the 1377: 1362: 1358:for yourself. 1340: 1294: 1284: 1270: 1253: 1246:blocking policy 1231: 1228: 1220: 1214: 1213:, then use the 1202: 1176: 1085: 1075: 1061: 1044: 1037:blocking policy 1022: 1005: 986: 962: 947:. Thank you. 937: 897: 876: 822: 792: 788: 785: 783:Talk page edits 768:. Thank you. 758: 722: 694: 675:199.209.144.218 670: 626: 591: 545: 543:citation needed 539: 532: 489: 487:Steve Greenberg 484: 477: 462: 448: 366: 343: 260: 233:15:55, 18 March 224:16:55, 17 March 162:Itamar killings 155: 132: 85: 28:this was under 21: 12: 11: 5: 2611: 2609: 2601: 2600: 2577: 2576: 2542: 2539: 2530: 2491: 2488: 2442: 2438: 2433: 2387: 2383: 2378: 2316: 2313: 2298: 2297: 2285: 2284: 2234: 2233: 2223: 2222: 2203:Mordechai Elon 2185: 2182: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2096: 2093: 2043: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2032: 1949: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1894: 1891: 1879: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1852: 1848: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1814: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1781: 1775: 1774: 1732: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1709:Kim Dent-Brown 1677:Kim Dent-Brown 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1615: 1614: 1575: 1530:, let alone a 1485: 1481:Request reason 1478: 1404: 1378: 1347: 1343:Decline reason 1315: 1311:Request reason 1308: 1229: 1203: 1183: 1179:Decline reason 1106: 1102:Request reason 1099: 1020: 968:You have been 960: 936: 933: 932: 931: 904:109.226.48.203 875: 872: 871: 870: 854:. See also on 833:109.226.26.232 821: 815: 784: 781: 757: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 723:Kim Dent-Brown 695:Kim Dent-Brown 669: 664: 661: 660: 642: 641: 636: 625: 622: 621: 620: 590: 585: 584: 583: 538:you added one 534:Hi Ajnem. In 531: 528: 527: 526: 488: 485: 476: 463: 461: 460:Talk page note 458: 436: 435: 426:and add it to 380:28 August 2011 376: 365: 362: 342: 337: 336: 335: 334: 333: 332: 331: 259: 256: 255: 254: 253: 252: 238: 237: 236: 230: 154: 151: 131: 128: 127: 126: 113: 87:Hello, Ajnem. 84: 81: 80: 79: 78: 77: 20: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2610: 2599: 2595: 2591: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2578: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2552: 2548: 2540: 2538: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2524:Sarah Sanbar 2522: 2519: 2516: 2515: 2512: 2507: 2505: 2501: 2496: 2489: 2487: 2486: 2482: 2478: 2474: 2470: 2466: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2446: 2437: 2434: 2432: 2431: 2427: 2423: 2419: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2395: 2391: 2382: 2379: 2377: 2376: 2372: 2368: 2364: 2359: 2358: 2355: 2350: 2349: 2346: 2343: 2340: 2337: 2334: 2329: 2327: 2314: 2312: 2311: 2307: 2303: 2293: 2287: 2286: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2278: 2274: 2273:edit the page 2270: 2266: 2262: 2258: 2248: 2247: 2243: 2239: 2230: 2225: 2224: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2216: 2212: 2211:edit the page 2208: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2183: 2181: 2180: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2159: 2155: 2154: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2141: 2140: 2135: 2131: 2130: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2112: 2108: 2102: 2094: 2092: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2074: 2071: 2067: 2061: 2057: 2053: 2049: 2048:Saulie Zajdel 2041: 2031: 2028: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2004: 2003: 2002: 1999: 1997: 1993: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1971: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1961: 1959: 1955: 1947: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1899:Saulie Zajdel 1892: 1890: 1889: 1886: 1877: 1867: 1862: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1846: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1815: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1801: 1796: 1791: 1787: 1786:User:Miszabot 1782: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1752: 1747: 1741: 1737: 1730: 1716: 1713: 1711: 1705: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1681: 1679: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1666: 1661: 1657: 1652: 1651:Geoff Brigham 1648: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1613: 1609: 1604: 1600: 1595: 1594: 1591: 1590: 1585: 1580: 1574: 1572: 1571:Accept reason 1567: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1548: 1546: 1543: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1516: 1514: 1512: 1508: 1506: 1501: 1499: 1497: 1493: 1490: 1484: 1482: 1477: 1472: 1468: 1462: 1458: 1453: 1449: 1444: 1439: 1435: 1434:global blocks 1431: 1430:active blocks 1427: 1422: 1418: 1416: 1415:administrator 1402: 1401: 1394: 1387: 1385: 1376: 1375: 1370: 1366: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1346: 1344: 1339: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1321: 1314: 1312: 1307: 1302: 1298: 1292: 1288: 1283: 1279: 1274: 1269: 1265: 1264:global blocks 1261: 1260:active blocks 1257: 1252: 1247: 1243: 1241: 1240:administrator 1227: 1226: 1219: 1212: 1210: 1201: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1182: 1180: 1175: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1160: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1144: 1142: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1105: 1103: 1098: 1093: 1089: 1083: 1079: 1074: 1070: 1065: 1060: 1056: 1055:global blocks 1052: 1051:active blocks 1048: 1043: 1038: 1034: 1032: 1031:administrator 1019: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1004: 1000: 994: 990: 984: 980: 976: 973: 972: 959: 958: 954: 950: 946: 942: 930: 926: 922: 917: 916: 915: 913: 909: 905: 901: 894: 893: 890: 887: 883: 880: 873: 869: 865: 861: 857: 853: 849: 845: 844: 843: 842: 838: 834: 829: 827: 819: 816: 814: 813: 809: 805: 801: 800: 794: 790: 782: 780: 779: 775: 771: 767: 763: 755: 745: 741: 737: 732: 731: 730: 727: 725: 718: 717: 716: 712: 708: 704: 703: 702: 699: 697: 690: 687: 686: 685: 684: 680: 676: 668: 667:Jack Abramoff 665: 659: 658: 654: 650: 649:Maryana (WMF) 644: 643: 640: 637: 634: 629: 623: 619: 615: 611: 608:my pleasure, 607: 606: 605: 604: 600: 596: 589: 586: 582: 578: 574: 570: 566: 565: 564: 563: 559: 555: 551: 544: 537: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 512: 511: 510: 506: 502: 498: 494: 486: 481: 474: 467: 459: 457: 456: 453: 451: 444: 443: 433: 429: 423: 419: 413: 409: 407: 403: 402: 395: 394: 393: 387: 386: 385:Did you know? 381: 377: 374: 370: 369: 363: 361: 360: 356: 352: 348: 341: 338: 330: 326: 322: 318: 317: 316: 312: 308: 303: 302: 301: 297: 293: 289: 285: 281: 277: 276: 275: 274: 270: 266: 257: 251: 247: 243: 239: 234: 231: 229: 225: 222: 221: 219: 216: 213: 209: 205: 204: 203: 199: 195: 191: 190: 189: 188: 184: 180: 176: 171: 167: 163: 159: 152: 150: 149: 145: 141: 137: 129: 125: 121: 117: 114: 111: 110: 109: 108: 104: 100: 95: 91: 88: 82: 76: 72: 68: 64: 63: 62: 58: 54: 50: 49: 48: 47: 43: 39: 35: 31: 26: 19: 16: 2544: 2526: 2523: 2520: 2517: 2513: 2508: 2497: 2493: 2440: 2385: 2360: 2351: 2345:WP:PROMOTION 2330: 2318: 2299: 2296:{{cite web | 2291: 2249: 2235: 2228: 2187: 2164: 2098: 2075: 2045: 2021:This article 1969: 1951: 1896: 1881: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1660:UltraExactZZ 1655: 1603:UltraExactZZ 1576: 1570: 1569: 1552: 1549: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1517: 1510: 1504: 1502: 1495: 1491: 1488: 1486: 1480: 1479: 1452:creation log 1419: 1412: 1399: 1381: 1379: 1351: 1348: 1342: 1341: 1316: 1310: 1309: 1282:creation log 1249: 1237: 1224: 1206: 1204: 1186: 1184: 1178: 1177: 1161: 1152: 1148: 1145: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1107: 1101: 1100: 1073:creation log 1040: 1028: 1006: 1002: 992: 975:indefinitely 974: 969: 938: 898:— Preceding 895: 884: 881: 877: 830: 825: 823: 804:92.6.211.228 797: 786: 759: 671: 646: 638: 592: 533: 530:Holy Rollers 490: 445: 441: 439: 399: 397: 390: 389: 383: 344: 261: 214: 211: 173: 156: 133: 96: 92: 89: 86: 83:Mileva Maric 56: 33: 29: 22: 2354:WP:PERSONAL 2336:WP:CAUTIOUS 2255:Hello, I'm 2193:Hello, I'm 2184:August 2013 2158:Yaakov Katz 2143:Yoaz Hendel 1878:Re: Infobox 1526:, or to be 1360:FisherQueen 1191:Max Semenik 550:BlueMoonlet 422:quick check 2532:Questions? 2461:topic bans 2406:topic bans 2302:BracketBot 2257:BracketBot 2238:BracketBot 2195:BracketBot 2169:. Thanks, 2080:. Thanks, 1731:Your email 1448:filter log 1325:suggestion 1278:filter log 1134:“coersion” 1069:filter log 858:. Cheers, 756:ANI-notice 673:involved. 418:here's how 347:Talk:Efrat 158:User:Ajnem 130:ANI notice 34:Governance 30:Demography 2504:user page 2457:site bans 2402:site bans 2357:WP:HARASS 2333:WP:VANDAL 2261:your edit 2199:your edit 2119:Avi Weiss 2105:Read the 2064:Read the 2025:PiMaster3 1996:PiMaster3 1958:PiMaster3 1522:or to be 1467:checkuser 1426:block log 1382:read the 1297:checkuser 1256:block log 1207:read the 1153:coercison 1151:and even 1088:checkuser 1047:block log 689:This diff 280:Biosketch 242:Biosketch 179:Biosketch 67:Skinsmoke 38:Skinsmoke 2582:RogerSni 2562:RogerSni 2547:RogerSni 2528:Sarabnas 2367:Caseeart 2300:Thanks, 2236:Thanks, 1970:Orthodox 1885:Ynhockey 1856:Amatulić 1790:Amatulić 1746:Amatulić 1704:Amatulić 1599:WP:LEGAL 1579:Amatulić 1438:contribs 1369:contribs 1356:WP:LEGAL 1268:contribs 1149:a threat 1059:contribs 991:|reason= 900:unsigned 848:outposts 505:contribs 428:DYKSTATS 406:kamikaze 218:contribs 116:Esterson 99:Esterson 2171:DPL bot 2134:Mesorah 2082:DPL bot 1461:unblock 1393:unblock 1352:clearly 1291:unblock 1218:unblock 1082:unblock 989:unblock 971:blocked 770:Eelnire 493:WP:NPOV 258:BUS PIC 175:revert. 2566:Drmies 2502:or my 2447:. The 2392:. The 2269:syntax 2207:syntax 1893:Zajdel 1001:first. 595:Decora 351:@Efrat 307:@Efrat 265:@Efrat 170:WP:1RR 166:WP:OWN 2348:WP:OR 2007:Ajnem 1977:Ajnem 1918:Ajnem 1819:Ajnem 1764:Ajnem 1690:Ajnem 1656:would 1629:Ajnem 1557:Ajnem 1421:Ajnem 1386:first 1329:Ajnem 1251:Ajnem 1211:first 1165:Ajnem 1042:Ajnem 921:Ajnem 860:Ajnem 736:Ajnem 707:Ajnem 610:Ajnem 573:Ajnem 516:Ajnem 495:. - 340:Efrat 321:Ajnem 292:Ajnem 284:Egged 208:Ajnem 194:Ajnem 53:Ajnem 2594:talk 2570:talk 2560:No, 2551:talk 2481:talk 2426:talk 2371:talk 2306:talk 2242:talk 2175:talk 2086:talk 2011:talk 1994:. -- 1981:talk 1936:talk 1922:talk 1907:talk 1861:talk 1823:talk 1795:talk 1768:talk 1751:talk 1694:talk 1633:talk 1584:talk 1561:talk 1365:talk 1333:talk 1195:talk 1169:talk 1132:and 1122:Dmcq 1013:talk 1009:John 953:talk 949:Dmcq 925:talk 908:talk 864:talk 837:talk 808:talk 799:this 774:talk 740:talk 711:talk 679:talk 653:talk 614:talk 599:talk 577:talk 569:here 520:talk 501:talk 497:Lisa 449:Talk 355:talk 325:talk 311:talk 296:talk 269:talk 246:talk 212:talk 198:talk 183:talk 144:talk 120:talk 103:talk 71:talk 57:talk 42:talk 25:Bern 18:Bern 2441:Hi, 2386:Hi, 2363:BLP 2342:POV 2263:to 2201:to 2107:FAQ 2066:FAQ 1851:it. 1665:Did 1608:Did 1489:not 1471:log 1301:log 1248:). 1143:. 1092:log 1039:). 378:On 206:Hi 2596:) 2572:) 2553:) 2483:) 2459:, 2428:) 2404:, 2373:) 2308:) 2292:]] 2279:. 2244:) 2217:. 2177:) 2153:) 2149:| 2129:) 2125:| 2088:) 2058:| 2013:) 1983:) 1938:) 1924:) 1909:) 1825:) 1770:) 1696:) 1635:) 1627:, 1573:: 1563:) 1547:. 1483:: 1465:• 1459:• 1455:• 1450:• 1446:• 1441:• 1436:• 1432:• 1428:• 1396:}} 1390:{{ 1367:· 1345:: 1335:) 1313:: 1295:• 1289:• 1285:• 1280:• 1276:• 1271:• 1266:• 1262:• 1258:• 1221:}} 1215:{{ 1197:) 1181:: 1171:) 1104:: 1086:• 1080:• 1076:• 1071:• 1067:• 1062:• 1057:• 1053:• 1049:• 1015:) 1007:-- 995:}} 987:{{ 955:) 927:) 910:) 866:) 839:) 810:) 776:) 742:) 713:) 681:) 655:) 616:) 601:) 579:) 571:, 560:) 546:}} 540:{{ 522:) 507:) 503:- 442:NW 420:, 382:, 357:) 327:) 313:) 298:) 271:) 248:) 200:) 185:) 146:) 122:) 105:) 73:) 59:) 44:) 2592:( 2580:@ 2568:( 2549:( 2479:( 2424:( 2369:( 2304:( 2240:( 2229:] 2173:( 2145:( 2121:( 2113:. 2084:( 2072:. 2054:( 2009:( 1979:( 1934:( 1920:( 1905:( 1863:) 1859:( 1821:( 1797:) 1793:( 1766:( 1753:) 1749:( 1692:( 1662:~ 1631:( 1605:~ 1586:) 1582:( 1559:( 1475:) 1473:) 1469:( 1424:( 1371:) 1363:( 1331:( 1305:) 1303:) 1299:( 1254:( 1193:( 1185:" 1167:( 1157:3 1141:1 1126:3 1118:1 1114:2 1110:1 1096:) 1094:) 1090:( 1045:( 1011:( 951:( 923:( 906:( 862:( 835:( 806:( 772:( 738:( 709:( 677:( 651:( 612:( 597:( 575:( 558:c 556:/ 554:t 552:( 518:( 499:( 475:. 452:) 446:( 434:. 424:) 416:( 353:( 323:( 309:( 294:( 267:( 244:( 215:· 210:( 196:( 181:( 142:( 118:( 101:( 69:( 55:( 40:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index