User talk:Alexandra IDV/Archive 4

183:

Crate, etc. I've noticed a lot of individuals ignoring FUNimation's inconsistent translations in general and merely sought to create a sense of consistency insofar as relating to the games' English canon. In no way was it meant to suggest one title was better than the other, and if it came across that way then I apologize. As for the short key issue, I was intending to correct the articles in question as well, but obviously that will no longer be the case. I do see where you're coming from with your arguments, however, and I'll keep them in mind as I continue to improve.

31: 2063: 1764: 1217: 2101: 2942: 2769: 2655: 2461: 2288: 1835: 1426: 1173: 748: 484: 278: 826: 810: 793: 2883: 2596: 2402: 2229: 1367: 1783:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1236:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 2832: 2718: 2524: 2351: 2178: 1683: 1122: 697: 642: 433: 1877:

highlight key video game characters from franchises if they appear in a cross-over. Just look at Namco x Capcom's page for instance. All rival units are listed and that game is a Prequel to Project X Zone. In order to maintain consistency, I've added the rival units for Project X Zone and Project X Zone 2.

1560:. Basically, I've expanded the lead, created a proper development section, and added a gameplay image. I'm not that keen on taking it any further, but the rest of the article should be very easy to get together. If you wanted, you could easily polish it up, expand it a little further, then take it to GA. -- 1965:

to FAC quality, do you think I would need to remove the cast list there like you did? The section image adds the names of the voice actors, the setting has the VAs in parantheses, and the plot section has VAs in parantheses as well - but it's missing the VA for one character since the VA doesn't have

1516:

this contradicts the later statement (as seen in the Siliconera source), but I believe I at the time was under the impression that Uchikoshi only added things onto an already existing ending rather than adding another Novel section at the end, separate from the main narrative - both of these would be

1467:

First off, thanks for asking for reviewers on the WPVG Talk page. Second, I have a question regarding Uchikoshi's statements on the ending to VLR. He says that he added the extra ending after the 2011 earthquake and tsunami. Obviously, this is already in the article, but one thing that strikes me odd

1638:

Cool, thanks for the reply. Interesting - I never thought of that. I always thought of article quality in terms of what information can be reported, so right now the Shenmue 3 article is as good as I can an article about a subject for whom stuff like reception or gameplay is, by definition, unknown.

205:

No worries. I know where you're coming from - I personally find it annoying that Funimation doesn't use the same terminology as NISA - but when we write on Knowledge (XXG), we go by what reliable secondary sources say about a subject, and try not to express our own personal opinions in the articles.

1506:

KU: The ending was really crisp. You might want to put a SPOILER ALERT. What happens is that human kind is all destroyed, nobody survives. At this point somebody goes back into the past, and the original ending was to go back to the past, change a little bit so that the future is saved, and then it

182:

Hey, hopefully this is the right place to do this - I'm new here - but I just wanted to address some of the comments made during the editing of the Danganronpa 3 page. The show's mainly know as Danganronpa 3: The End of Hope's Peak Academy in the fandom, on its respective wiki, on Kotaku, with Loot

2002:

From what I've seen of the articles that VGSCOPE lists as examples, it seems like it would be a good idea to expand on why Nolan North was chosen as a voice actor in the first place (and find a reliable source demonstrating this), since that's actually significant in the context of what the wider

1597:

Yo. You rated the Shenmue III article a C on the quality scale. Could you tell me why? I was actually pretty pleased with the article and might have nominated it for GA had it not been for a subject that is due to change dramatically (ie the video game has yet to be finished and released). If you

1499:

KU: I really forget quickly about the things I write, and regarding 999 I think it was as it is. There was no other ending. However, for Virtue’s Last Reward, the game was completed when the earthquake struck, in March 2011. It was completed, but with that ending we felt that it’s a bit . . . Not

222:

Thanks for understanding about both my inexperience on the site and sharing in the misery, as it were. I have a couple of articles referring to the show as "The End of Hope's Peak Academy," so I'll do as you suggested and reference them for the addition (Kotaku turned out not to be one of them -

212:

tags) and write "also known as...". While we should generally use the official English title for a work as an article title, I could see there being an argument for using "Hope's Peak Academy" in the prose when referring the the school itself, but I am unsure. I would probably start a discussion

1876:

I understood that you deleted all the rival units within Project X Zone and Project X Zone 2's page, however, they in the game, Rival Units and enemies are categorised differently. Rival Units are listed as key characters within the game. Because it is a crossover series, it is recommended to

363:

I'm glad you like the things I've worked on! Aside from enjoying these games myself, it feels meaningful and rewarding to improve on an obscure game's article that would likely never be worked on (or not for a long time) if I hadn't done it myself - this is also what drew me to my recent GA,

1620:

Don't worry, it wasn't because of any quality concerns - the article looks good and on the right track, it's just that I would be very hesitant to rate a game article (for a game that isn't cancelled) above C if it doesn't have anything about the game's gameplay or reception. If you look at

1988:

Well, I'm not an expert, but my understanding is that if you have information about the casting, then that can go in the development section, and that cast lists in themselves aren't relevant for video games the way they are for films. I would either just follow VGSCOPE (like I did with

2115:

I enjoy your user page style and adapted it for my own, hope you don't mind. And noticed your got your first bronze star at English Knowledge (XXG), congratulations! It's admirable that you promoted dozens of high-class articles within one year, that's hard to image in my home wiki :)

240:

Just wanted to thank you for cleaning up the references and compliment the nice compromise that was made on the Danganronpa 3 page concerning the whole "High School"/"Academy" issue - addresses it, gets the point across and looks nice and clean. Again, appreciate all the help!

389:

article ever since I played that game, but it feels like a lot of work - it's ranked as a GA, but focuses too much on plot/character details, and the anime stuff should probably be spun out into its own article. Maybe I'll get around to that after I'm done with the

1507:

finishes. However, this felt a bit crisp and sudden. So what we did is, we added a lot of content to say that you, by going back and working in the past to change the future, thanks to your efforts there is some hope. To give it a more positive nuance.

1885:

With my new edits, I decided not to add cameo characters as part of Knowledge (XXG)'s policy. Please discuss with me your thoughts before reverting the edit. This is a community site at the end of the day so we both have to agree as to what's best :)

143:

Two separate sections. I was concerned they would be broadcast at the same time but the announcement says they aren't going to mix so we won't need the interleaving of the episodes. They can stay on the same main article for now.

922: 1468:

is that it seems a bit contradictory to what's in the article, which currently states that he changed how the original ending played out, not that he added an additional ending to the game. Since I don't own

1430: 1375: 941: 134:

You mean two separate pages? If it gets too long, maybe, but if they're both 12 episodes long or something it shouldn't be a problem to have both on the same page. They're still part of the same show.--

936: 927: 343:- the game just recently came on my radar due to the E3 announcement, and I was thinking I'd go make an article for it. Little did I know you already created a good start for it a few months ago. 1416: 1409: 1357: 1350: 1061: 1043: 628: 621: 551:

I wouldn't mind a review swap, but I haven't played the Chrono games yet, and want to play them without knowing about the story and characters beforehand. Would it be all right if I did

1966:

an article. From what I understand of this, the plot section should have the VAs removed, but the setting can keep the VAs? Since there's only 3 listed, which are the main characters.

821: 813: 2465: 2410: 1273:

I only uploaded it minutes ago, and had not yet written the image caption for the article it is now used in. Surely that short period of time before clicking "save" must be okay?--

1057: 1039: 1028: 817: 223:

whoops). If you - or anyone, for that matter - think they are insufficient, then by all means give 'em the ax. Kinda learning all this as I go. Appreciate the time and advice!

1052: 1010: 2553: 2451: 2444: 2392: 2385: 2337: 2330: 1625:, the criteria for B is "The article is mostly complete and without major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards", which I believe the 1019: 1024: 1073: 1048: 1006: 2890:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See 2603:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See 2409:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See 2236:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See 1374:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See 1228: 392: 2003:

game sets out to achieve - I think many of the other cast names can be removed though. I'll follow up on this at the WikiProject page - thanks for the reply.

1942:

Haha, I actually do own a copy of Project X Zone 2, I just haven't gotten around to playing it yet - there's just way too many interesting games coming out.--

1993:) or ask editors at the VG WikiProject. I was not part of the discussion(s) leading up to it, so you can probably get better answers from people who were.-- 1731: 1319: 1015: 107:

It looks like they'll be running two Danganronpa 3 episodes every week, one from each story arc, on separate days, so two episode lists would work fine.

2012: 2773: 1795: 1248: 976: 2949: