User talk:Alpha Quadrant/Archive 14

2000:

family to make a positive difference in their communities and the world." is a summary of the explanation given by the the founders as quoted in several cited sources. Because the section that sentence is in is "HISTORY" I would assume that it should contain information about why the project wast started. As far as I know, it is not debatable "why" it was started, because the articles have all been pretty clear about the reasons. So I'm a bit confused. I really want to make this article work, but I just don't know what you mean from the notes. I've worked with other Wiki editors (i.e. OldYeller) to get it to this point...and it's a lot better than it was, and I really just want to make it work. Your note also indicated that the 21 cited sources from newspapers, magazines, and local news outlets were not enough for this article to be approved. I'm not sure what more I could have included that would meet the criteria you're talking about. I could really use some additional clarifications on your determination for this article. Thanks

1565:(EC) No, it's not that we don't get it, it's that we don't agree with you. And that's the bit that you don't get. Part of the wikipedia way is that articles tend to improve more rapidly once they're promoted; and if we want an AfC process that users buy into, we don;t get that by creating unmanageable backlogs. I've looked, quickly, at the 7th Feb version which was promoted and I find plenty of NN refs. Finally, and not to put to fine a point on it, I think the tone of an earlier post of yours to AQ - "I see you are on "editor review", so take it on board: that was a poor decision" - was way out of line, deeply uncivil and arrogant. -- 3413:. Meaning that the sources were released by an organization with a strong reputation for fact checking and the publishing organization is completely independent of the subject. Currently both sources listed are reliable, but they are also both affiliated with the subject. Could you please add two or more reliable third party sources to the submission; such as newspaper articles, magazines, books, or other media released by organizations with a strong reputation for fact checking. The sources don't need to be online, or even in English. If you have any questions, I would be more than happy to help. Best, 712:; "in general, debates should not be relisted more than twice"). As you point out, relisting has the benefit of a German speaker seeing the debate -- and as indicated at the AfD itself, mention of the AfD has now been listed, for just that purpose, at the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. That would be helpful -- given those admissions of keep !voters to the effect that they have not seen the sources they surmise may exist (or do not know whether certain awards/shows/parts are notable) but are just assuming it (which seems to run somewhat counter to 2118:

doesn't go to notability. As far as I could tell, it satisfied all of the criteria for a presumption of notability, so is there a more subtle flaw I'm not yet experienced enough to spot? A court opinion from the highest court in a state announcing binding law on the citizens of that state, with persuasive authority in other state courts, seems notable, especially a case illustrating the development of the common law framework of later federal law (in this case, the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act). What am I missing? --

2452: 2642:

source. I'll assume that it is a reliable source independent of the subject. Source four cites a museum, but Jan White is only mentioned in two brief sentences. The last source cites wordpress, and like all other blogs, the reliability is questionable. In order to clearly establish the subject's notability, could you please add at least two reliable sources that are completely independent of the subject. If you have any questions, I would be more than happy to help.

3541: 1082:

around for several years as well. My question is, how are these sources not reliable? And doesn't a scan of an actual flyer or marquee provide strong proof of the article in question? I have submitted articles for video games using GameFaqs as reference before and never had this kind of problem. I don't want my article declined again and I know some things need to be corrected, but I'm confused as of what to do next. What do you suggest? Thank you.

4102: 1258: 449: 31: 4174:, meaning that the organization(s) that published the sources are not affiliated with the subject and the organization has a strong reputation for fact checking. The second issue with the article is the tone. Several sentences in the article are written in an advertising tone. (For example, the article refers to the organization's products as "solutions") As Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia, all information should be written in a 2392: 1450:, i.e., the fact that you moved such a crappy article from AfC into article space. It's based almost entirely on primary sources, much of it is unreferenced, and in many instances the references present don't actually verify the content. I realize that the editor requesting creation and could have created a crappy article all on his own -- but why facilitate it for him? It should have been declined, especially as a BLP. 1966:. The first third of the article appears to be well sourced with reliable sources. However, the two thirds of the article relies entirely on sources affiliated with the subject. If possible, could you please add two a few reliable sources to the last two thirds of the article. After this is done, I believe I can accept the article submission. If you have any questions, I would be more than happy to help. Best, 4280: 2071: 2003: 2145:. Presently, there is only one source in the article, and it merely verifies the existence of the court case. Could you please add a few (at least two) reliable sources that are independent of the subject. For example, news coverage or other sources released by an organization with a strong reputation for fact checking. If you need any assistance, I would be more than happy to help. Best, 1692:, first party sources may be used, but they should be used with care. In this case, the primary source is merely verifying his affiliation with an organization. While a third party sources are preferable, first party sources may be used to verify this type of information. A bit of work still needs to be done, but I believe I removed the majority of the problem. Best, 1330: 972:#3, only one file should be used in the place of multiple files, if one file will reasonable suffice. While it would be nice to have a history of a company's logos, because the files are unfree, it would be very difficult to justify their usage under non-free content criterion 8. (Note that the non-free content criteria were constructed by with 3626: 2289:

per the philosphy of Occam's Razor, I believe the most likely explanation to some of your edits is that you do work for one of the organizations in question. This is not a personal attack, it is simply a fair question. Making edits based on conflicts of interest is against WP standards. No amount of wikilawyering will change that fact.

3086:

coverage. I have checked over the current nominations with google books, and it appears that five of the twenty-seven articles nominated might meet the notability guidelines based on the google books coverage. I'll be sure to check google books in the future before making nominations. I apologize for my erroneously made nominations.

763:

contacted says: "This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries." Would it be possible to open the page in the meantime? As one of the keep editors indicated -- he left a request for help. It will not be the best result perhaps if a responding editor comes to a closed page. Thanks.--

4049:

I proposed two newly created articles (currently existing as redirect) for deletion, for the reasons mentioned in the deletion proposal. Basically I don't think that we can find single articles where we can redirect the current articles (e.g. Kham, Amdo, Sichuan, Qinghai, Gansu, Yunnan are all partly

3064:

If you choose to ignore this advice I can with almost certainty guarantee you the following will happen: because of 2) people will conclude they cannot take your word for it that these companies should in fact all be deleted and because of 1) they will feel put under too much pressure to find sources

2987:

Thanks again, but like I said, I never planned on writing an article, so I'll gladly pass the torch. The statements I made about notability were to convince someone to write said article; unfortunately I don't have a printed source on hand, just some general knowledge and first hand quotes that would

2929:

more understandable, but still a startling oversight.) I really would've expected someone on Knowledge (XXG) with an interest in archaeology to have done this a long time ago, but it's true that pre-Columbian studies aren't as popular as, say, Egyptology, so I guess no one's gotten around to it yet.

677:

The discussion had already been open for 14 days. While I agree the keep rationales were fairly weak, the only user arguing for deletion was the nominator. The keep votes appeared to based on the fact that because the person is in a country where the primary language is German, there may be reliable

345:

Hello, thanks for reviewing my article! You mentioned that the article already existed on Knowledge (XXG), and this is true since I uploaded it directly before doing the article creation process. My question is: why is it that when I search for "Atlas Shrugged Part 2" I cannot find it? Is the article

3363:

I'd like some help with my article. I created it based on facts about D-STAR Lab(old name is ASIS Lab). You said my article is not adequately supported by reliable, independent sources. But I cited to the D-STAR Lab's website which is a subsite of the website of Ho Chi Minh University of Technology.

2924:

Thank you for contacting me about the Christopher Donnan article. I don't really anticipate doing anything further with it because I never planned on writing an article- I was just trying to help get you guys started/giving reasons why there should be one. (I was shocked that there wasn't already an

2117:

Hi, I recently submitted "Norris v. Moskin Stores, Inc." for review. You rejected it on Notability grounds. Since I'm pretty new to this, I read through the notability pages, but can't figure out what the problem is. While the article needs to be be fleshed out (it's definitely a bit stubbish), that

2067:

Thanks for the clarity and examples. I have already addressed the first line in HISTORY as you indicated. I think I am understanding better what you mean. I'll go through it again and see if I can clean up the madness. When I'm done and before I resubmit it, I'd love your eyes on it one more time if

2045:

While the statement isn't neutral, it is clearly attributing who holds this view. There are a few other statements throughout the article that aren't neutral. For example, in the "photo activism" section, the statement "The popularity of social networks... has fueled the viral success of the project

1483:

This response completely misses the point. Issues like this in a BLP are not minor, they're major. If there are too many articles to review, that reinforces the case for accepting only the good ones; it hardly follows from "too many submissions" that one should accept crappy ones. Look, I see you

1465:

Yes, it does rely on primary sources, and it does have a somewhat promotional tone. With that said, the issues with the article aren't damning. The issues can be fixed with a bit of work. While I would indeed prefer that every article moved to mainspace is neutral, well written, and well sourced, it

94:

I am somewhat frustrated. I have twice attempted to submit an article on Commitment-based Management. I have referred to a book in which this material features, and have referred to newspaper articles and journals in which the results of this work appear. Enterprises win awards due to performance

2288:

Your wikilawyering does not exempt you from a fair question based on a pattern of edits which may be due to a conflict of interest. It is a fair question and you have refused to answer it on what you perceive as technical grounds. You will neither confirm nor deny you have a conflict of interest. A

2023:

Yes, this article is really well done. There is just a bit of promotional language still present in the article. The example I gave in the article isn't written in a neutral tone. If the statement is cited in reliable sources, then you could use the statement. However, because this statement is not

1914:

Thanks for your feedback, but I'm a little mystified about what kind of sources would meet the criteria. Your comments said that I need independent and reliable sources to prove the subject's noteability, and I had included several newspapers, a magazine, and TV station, and CBC Radio (our national

2641:

Presently, there are five sources used in the article. References one and two are duplicates of one-another. While it is reliable, the independence of the source is questionable, as it was published by the college that he attended. I don't have access to source three, so I am unable to analyze the

1999:

Thanks for your review of the article, but I'm not completely clear on what your comments mean or how to resolve them. The specific example you gave in your comments that the sentence "was created to encourage individuals to get more active in educating, inspiring, and empowering their friends and

1529:

It looks like there are 7 statements that are unsourced or the source doesn't verify the information. I am going through and adding sources to those statements. There is nothing libel or defamatory about the statements, it is just information about what organizations he was/is affiliated with, and

1081:

but it was rejected due to not having any references. I then added them but it was again declined citing the references as unreliable. My main reference is gamefaqs.com, which covers all video game info and belongs to CBS. I also included links to game artwork from arcade-museum.com which has been

2801:

FYI, articles which go through AfD and are closed as "Keep" are not eligible for speedy deletion, except in the case of copyright violation (or a few technical ones, like making way for a pagemove). If you're unhappy with an old AfD, you need to run an article through that ringer again. Cheers,

1731:

is applicable. This source just verifies the year he joined the organization. There are third party sources supporting the fact that he is a member. So "primary-source material has been discussed by a reliable secondary source" has been covered anyway. It just didn't list the year that he joined.

809:

Many thanks. I think that relisting the current AfD would perhaps be fairer, as it would retain the three delete !votes. Also, presumably that would also allow the existing requests for further German-fluent editor input. Do you think it would be OK if I were to seek input from the one German

3929:

I am not sure why this IP jumped in on your talk page, it geolocates to the United Kingdom. The dispute he links to is between you and a Florida geolocated IP. It is possible you upset this person in the past, so they are stalking your edits. There are two ways to deal with this. You could just

2968:

should be quantified. The last statement says that he "is widely regarded as a founding influence by other archaeologists in this field". That statement really needs to have at least one source for verification. The source doesn't have to be online, but there needs to be a source verifying that

3505:

It's not a problem, everyone makes mistakes. The warnings given to you were equally wrong. The user who gave you the warning should have just explained this to you. I have informed the warning user that these warnings were not appropriate. On a side note, you might consider reading through the

3439:

for deletion, the message said just by proposing it for deletion was "vandalism". So are we allowed to ask pages be deleted or not? If I propose another page for deletion, will I again be falsely accussed of "vandalism" and be "threatened" with a block? I forgot to log in before I proposed the

3085:

and recategorizing the articles into sub-categories. I checked google news, and nominated the articles that appeared to fail the notability guidelines. Near the end of the recategorization, I wasn't sure about another older software company, so I checked google books and I found quite a bit of

2933:

I really only have a casual interest in Knowledge (XXG), mainly because of some highly questionable behaviors I've seen by certain users. It's obvious that a more centrally controlled system with more oversight is required. But I digress... I'd only like to suggest that someone create a Donnan

3152:

in reliable sources independent of the subject, such as newspaper articles, magazine articles, online news articles, books, or other media released by an organization with a strong reputation for fact checking. The subject's official website is a reliable source, but it is affiliated with the

762:

That's great. If he is busy, I know of another German-speaking editor who has been around since 2007, and who is excellent, who would be worth asking to take a look IMHO. I've seen him do very careful work in similar circumstances. I note that the user talkpage of the editor you helpfully

777:

Hi -- I know you've been busy, so you may have missed this. Given that the close is controversial, and this has only been extended once, and that we have existing requests at the German wikipedians page pointing them to the AfD -- which is not helping, as the AfD appears closed, and those

3153:

subject, so it doesn't really help establish the subject's notability. IMDb is independent of the subject, but it is not a reliable source because it is user generated content. The two book citations don't have enough information in order to verify the information, could you please see

3979:

Thanks Alpha Quadrant for the move from Global College to LIU Global. Although the new URL does not reflect the name correctly. The name is now LIU Global, not Global College. So the URL should not say Global College, rather LIU Global. Can you change that too please? Thanks, Susan

3258:

You tagged this for G12 speedy, but you didn't note the source page, and it's not so blatant that we don't need a source. I've declined the speedy deletion because there's no source page given; please revert me and add a link to the source or explain how it's otherwise a copyvio.

2559:

under the reference section. As a result, the references weren't showing up. I have added it to the article. The article appears to still have a bit of a promotional tone though. Could you please remove or reword the promotional content, so that the article is written in a

1577:

The editor wants feedback -- I gave it to him, and I see no need to apologize. He created a crappy BLP -- the last thing we need around here. The way to avoid creating unmanageable backlogs is to decline to create articles that aren't written and sourced properly.

946:

Could you explain the rationale for deleting former logos of a current company (e.g. Sirsi Corporation, others)? Was there a discussion I could read through as to why these should be removed? I would think it would have value to the historical context of articles.

1867:

I'm not sure if you're using a script to relist AfD's, but some of your recent ones haven't been working 100%. The relisting template was added to the AfD, but it wasn't correctly transcluded to the new log page or un-transcluded from the old log page. Myself and

292:. Could you please add at least one reliable source, such as a newspaper article, a magazine article, or other media release by an organization with a strong reputation for fact checking. Sources do not need to be online, nor do they need to be in English. Best, 2992:

by Sidney D. Kirkpatrick touted him highly, although it's hardly an archaeological work; I'm sure other publications have as well. I have a terrible time finding information online- that alone should disqualify me as a Knowledge (XXG) author, I would think.)

1427:

I remembered seeing this some time ago. I had proposed speedy deletion (A7) on a fair number of stubs that said basically "X was a . It was acquired by Cisco on ." Some carried and others did not. Might be a good idea to kick it up to the next step. -

3819:. Reliable third party sources are sources where the publisher has a strong reputation for fact checking, and the publishing organization is completely independent of the subject. Could you please add two or more reliable third party sources. Thank you, 3112:

was rejected. Was curious as to why, as he is a famous actor. I sited his website, as well as 2 books that write about him, and IMDB.COM, which gives a complete listing of his many works. Seriously, you don't know who Jack Grinnage is? You've never seen

1620:

Funny, because he did not create it. Why don't you work in the AFC backlog for a little while, and let us criticize you as you have just torn AQ apart. As a wise man once said, "Do not criticize someone's job performance unless you have done it before."

2328:, "attempted outing is grounds for an immediate block". You can believe what you want to believe; it's irrelevant. But, continuing your behavior or attempted outings WILL result in a block, nevermind the blatant personal attacks you are making. -- 288:. I took a look at the French Knowledge (XXG) entry when I did the review. While there is an article on the French Knowledge (XXG), it does not have any sources either. In order for the information to be verifiable, there needs to be at least one 1888:. It looks like for some reason it didn't relist two of the debates. Usually this happens when the script edit conflicts, but in the past, it gave me a message warning me about it. In which case I manually corrected it. Thanks for the notice, 3216:

Thanks for making the image name more descriptive, but I would suggest "Paulins Kill Viaduct in Hainesburg, NJ.jpg" instead of the current "Pualins Kill Viaduct in Haineburg, NJ.jpg", in which both structure and location name are misspelled.

1171:. I don't have access to the third source, so I was unable to determine whether or not the source is unaffiliated with the subject. Could you please add two or more reliable sources that are unaffiliated with the subject. Preferably using 2365:

It _IS_ a badge of honor! You're not a true NFCC patroller until someone calls you a copyright/nfcc/fair use nazi. Careful now. If you keep it up, someone might accuse you of being a mindless automaton or even a real knee biter. Oh the

2996:

I believe I also left links to Donnan's offices at UCLA for possible further fact gathering (although I can't guarantee he would welcome the publicity). Anyhow, good luck to you and to whoever actually ends up writing the article.

1001:

Hello, I submitted an article for the author Criss Jami. The article was declined stating that the subject lacked music-related notability, however the article was about a notable author. I'm confused as to what I should re-submit.

421: 3440:

deletions, but that shouldn't matter, should it? Exactly how much freedom do we have on Wiki? I thought it belonged to ALL of us -- me, too -- and now I'm not even allowed to request a deletion? What gives? Thank you. Respectfully,

1466:

isn't currently possible. There is just a handful of reviewers at AfC, and on average, we get at least 270 article submissions a day. While the article I accepted had a few minor issues, it is unlikely the article will be deleted.

1158:

Hello Milenagru, presently, the article submission relies heavily on the person's official website and one of the person's books. While these sources are reliable, they are affiliated with the subject. In order to establish the

3946:

I agree with the 2nd idea. I doubt any good would result from engaging with him any further, so I will ignore him and carry on. I have an idea of who it might be, but speculation is pointless. Thanks for your suggestion.

707:

Thanks for responding. I think it would be appropriate -- especially where, as here, the matter is controversial for the reasons I mention -- to have a second relisting, though I agree that a third would be unusual (per

3129:-- who?) but a great well-proven actor like Grinnage isn't listed? I hope you'll reconsider ... my gosh, if you don't think Grinnage is noteable, then 99% of the people listed on Knowledge (XXG) are. Thank you. Best. 3709: 3065:

for a lot of articles in a short amount of time. The result will be a lot of "procedural keep" votes, articles that perhaps should have been deleted will be kept and your work will have been for nothing. Also see

3053:). Might I kindly advice you to 1) significantly slow down the rate at which you are nominating these articles and 2) put a little more research effort into these nominations than simply concluding the article is 2035:, the photo documentary was created to encourage individuals to get more active in educating, inspiring, and empowering their friends and family to make a positive difference in their communities and the world. 481: 2863:, which was meant to make the first parameter say if a section or an article is being tagged... Unfortunately, it is also expected that the same first parameter will be the name of the talk page section... 3806:

Hello Mattseo, the reason I declined it was because the article currently relies entirely on two sources that are both affiliated with the subject. In order to establish the subject's notability under the

1713:, which says: "Where primary-source material has been discussed by a reliable secondary source, it may be acceptable to rely on it to augment the secondary source..." That's a pretty strong requirement. 3904:? He is clearly someone with whom I have tangled before, judging by his comments, though I have no particular recollection of him. My guess is that he will return, given his attitude. Any thoughts? --- 4147:"reads like an ad". Following that review I made some changes to address this comment, and I sincerely do not think this is the case any more. Can you please point at specific offending text? Thanks. -- 626:

but so far as I can tell, he seems to be one of the better-known German television satirists, with coverage to match. The Adolf Grimme Award which he and Dennis Kaupp won in 2009 ... looks to me as if

2090:

Sure, not a problem. I'd be happy to re-read the article after you are done. After you are done with rewording the sentences, I can just accept it, and you won't have to go through a resubmit. Best,

1835:

I'm sorry I seem to have stirred up this hornets nest, I posted this article at the BLP noticeboard. I was just looking for third-person perspective after the exchange on my talk-page. I feel bad :(

504: 262:

Well the article was requested by the author himself, and is practically a perfect duplicatev of the french entry, wich I also did. So I don't understand the rejection ! Please help me with this !

1946:

Hello Randy Williams, the problem is that the majority of the last two thirds of article submission relies entirely on the subject's official website and the publisher's website. While these are

3743:

Thanks for the notification, but it really isn't necessary. The first thing I check after logging in is the current status of the AfC backlog. Unless of course I have new comments on this page.

1515:

No -- you really don't get it. It shouldn't have been created. If it should/could have been fixed, the person wanting the article should have been led to do that before accepting it via AfC.

3847:. Could you take a second look at it's new shape? I'm asking you because you are the only person to post at the Afd so far. I'd appreciate your input whether it agrees with my own view or not. 3323:

Hi, I just saw your most recent edit. Those images are being discussed on the talk page. Not sure if you'd already seen that, but thought I should mention it since you're editing on the topic.

827:. I don't see any problem with consulting the other German speaking editor. I spoke with Mabdul in IRC about a half hour ago, and he said he would try and look over the sources later today. 3646: 618:

been verified to be notable, with the editors hoping that others with sources might appear at the discussion to indicate if the sources were properly supportive or the awards/shows/parts

539:

Both are leading daily online and print newspapers in Sri Lanka. I doubt whether anyone in Sri Lanka be able to provide better sources. Therefore could you kindly reconsider the review?

1097:

Hello Beacon of Hope, I declined the article because the sources currently in the article all have brief passing mentions of the game and/or the information is unreliable. For example,

1727:

You failed to quote the sentence directly before and after that sentence. That particular policy explains that they should be used with care, under limited circumstances, and that the

1592:

Well, thanks for your contribution, Nomoskedasticity. You can see nothing wrong with your world view or way of communicating, even when others point out there may be issues. Hu hum. --

1988:

I've done a major rewrite and have taken out ALL references from the author and/or her publisher. I believe this new version will meet your criteria to accept the article submission.

1101:

is not a reliable source because it is user submitted content. It is enough to establish that the game exists, but there isn't enough coverage to establish that the subject meets the

3058: 1915:

broadcaster). If these won't work, can you help me understand what you're looking for? Ms. MacDonald has written several Canadian best-sellers and isn't on Knowledge (XXG) anywhere.

863:" indicates that he is indeed notable. (that German award can be compared to a won tournament of the French Open in tennis). I will try to find some good references in a few mins... 4318: 2881:

I have reverted the edit. I was attempting to standardize the template with the other cleanup templates. My apologizes, evidently, I broke the current functionality in the process.

2854:

This The additions by user "Sholokhov"'s factual accuracy is disputed. Please help to ensure that disputed facts are reliably sourced. See the relevant discussion on the talk page.

2685:

I thought a sandbox page should be only edited by the user themselves. The picture was just find where it was, but then again, I was going to remove it anyways. So, thank you? :P

175:

that are also unaffiliated (third party) with the subject. Presently, it doesn't look like there are any references in the article. If you have references, you might wish to read

4115: 2526:

and the other magazines are reputed industry magazines in pharmaceutical industry. I dont understand why are the being disregarded as non reliable and not independent sources.

1271: 462: 3475:, then the article should not be nominated for deletion. I hope that answers your question. If you have any other questions, I would be more than happy to help. Best wishes, 3996: 599: 88: 1105:. I did a google news search on the game, but I couldn't find anything. Given that the game was released in 1986, it is likely any news coverage of the game is offline. 3082: 2746: 101:

I am suffering from brain cancer, currently in remission. I am very keen to contribute a whole series of articles and case studies on CbM, but I need to get started!

3050: 2193:

Thanks for the feedback! I've added some additional references but I'm not sure if they're in the right spot. I've also tried to improve the format. How is it now? --

1370: 1337: 2753:. Same author has worked both, but I did not see any plans to fix anything on the talk pages. I can work it, but not sure of normal procedure in this situation. 3930:

ignore it and continue editing, or you could attempt to resolve the issue with the IP. I think it might be worth it to try and get past disputes left in the past.

602:, for further editor discussion. I note that if one reads the 3 stated keep rationales, they were less than solid. They relied on such things as on sources that 3619: 881:

won such an award? The article does not indicate that -- rather, it says that a segment in which he appeared won an award, but not that he won an actor award.--

3004:. although this is from a description of one of his books so I doubt it qualifies. Sorry- like I said, this is best suited to someone adept at online sourcing. 323: 316: 2960:

The subject does appear to meet the notability guidelines. My concern is that there are three claims made in the article that need to have sources. I have

1366: 1071: 207: 2660:

hi - notes 1, 4 and 5 are there to support the factual content, respectively education at Cornell, parentage & offspring. There are no duplicates.

475: 319: 3364:

I also cited to the homepage of Dr.Tran Khanh Dang who was founded this lab. Please tell me what is the problem with my sources. The Link: D-STAR Lab

510:

Hi, My Article on "Apollo Hospitals India Representative Office Sri Lanka Medref Services" had two third party references. But you have reviewed as;

1218:

How do I edit the first paragraph in my submission (Zero Propellant Maneuver)? There is an edit option for every other paragraph except the first.--

1130:

Can you help me with the article about Nenad Grujicic? I think I've done everything right. What do I need to change to meet your criteria? Milena

479:, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 1233:

To edit the first section of an article, you can click the "edit" button at the top right corner of the screen near the search bar. Best wishes,

3236:, I was just retargeting the links to the new filename. I have renamed the file to the suggested title and retargeted the incoming links. Best, 3057:

lacking sufficient sources, enough research so that you do not have to use the same deletion rationale over and over again, nominations such as

3992: 2782:

The list was also in the article. They removed the list from the article, and I added reciprocal hat notes. All handled. Sorry to bother.

1124: 1034:}}, of course. But looking at the submission, there's no way I can see how the author is notable. The article is not adequately supported with 555: 2207:

I updated the format a little bit myself so that the references would show up as well as italicizing the case name, as is the standard norm. -

486: 1934: 662:". Allowing more time for the editors that all three keep !voters hoped might show up to show up would, I think, be a good thing. Thanks.-- 640:

this topic appears to need the attention of editors fluent in German to help ascertain this topic's notability. Adding rescue tag to article.

3678: 1278: 1018: 995: 327: 108: 4144: 2934:

article because your encyclopedia is lessened by the lack of one. Thanks again for writing to me, and hopefully the scarce information I

3317: 3011: 2945: 2290: 2255: 1377: 269: 72: 67: 59: 1484:

are on "editor review", so take it on board: that was a poor decision, the last thing this project needs is more poorly-sourced BLPs.

4024:

will also take you to the article. As it was the organization's previous name, the search term is plausible, so the redirect is kept.

899:

Alpha -- the relist appears not to have taken root. Going to the article itself, there is no indication that it is at AfD. Thanks.--

2046:

since its inception." Saying that the event is a "viral success" is an opinion. The "Project Creators" section also uses quite a few

3389: 2598: 2542: 2582:

i have rephrased the lines to bring forth a neutral point of view... Request you to review and contribute as per your convenience

239:

and I thought WP:NBIO was a shortcut to that guideline. Thanks for bringing this to my attention, I will correct my mistake. Best,

4216:

is vandalism? On the face of it, it seems like a perfectly legitimate question, but perhaps there's context I'm not aware of. --

678:

third party sources in German. In order for this to be determined one way or another, a German speaker would need to look through

373:, so you should be able to find it with a search now. It may take up to three days for it to appear in suggested searches though. 2519: 236: 211: 3731: 2750: 2495:

Thank you. Nor would I have been able to clear it without your help. I hope to continue seeing you around at AfC. Best wishes,

2480: 2182: 1410: 1146: 1058: 690:. Reopening the AfD won't resolve this question, unless on the off chance a German speaking editor stumbles across the debate. 4357: 4337:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

4166:. Something that was launched this month more than likely does not meet the guidelines. The subject needs to have received a 3589: 3554: 1674:

Adding more primary sources is not cleaning it up. Credit where it's due: removing the promotional text is an improvement.

224: 1393: 517: 644:

I posted a notice at Knowledge (XXG) talk:German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board asking for assistance with this article

3797: 3557:! Paraphrasing (I hope not too closely): If everybody who reads this looked at one more article it could be over today. -- 2427: 2224: 2037: 1798: 1362:

Hello, Alpha Quadrant. This is a follow up to a request at AFC/R, one was missed. Could you complete one last redirect:

4286: 3862:

Nice work on the article. It appears the notability has now been established. I have withdrawn the AfD nomination. Best,

2030: 1787: 3958: 3915: 134: 3988: 3685: 2907: 2871: 3689: 2817:

Thanks for the notice. I hadn't seen that it had previously been taken to AfD. I have renominated the article. Best,

1765:

He is the sub-organization's CEO, how can he be unaffiliated with the organization. Read the very first sentence of

4338: 4324: 3302: 3284: 3118: 2964:. Saying that someone is one of the world's leading experts needs to have at least one source. Ideally, the use of 2248:

Do you work for Screen Gems, Sony Pictures Entertainment, or an associated company? 07:57, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

1766: 1756: 1718: 1679: 1609: 1583: 1520: 1489: 1455: 551: 38: 3696: 2518:

the references quoted in the article on Morarka Organic are from independent national reputed newspapers in India

778:

wikipedians who follow it may never return to it -- I would appreciate it if you would re-open the AfD. Thanks.--

4259: 4223: 3435:

Hi - I proposed a few pages be deleted and got a message saying I could be blocked for doing so. When I proposed

1930: 1885: 1316: 792:

Sure, I can reopen it. Would you prefer that I relist the current AfD, or would you like me to open a fresh AfD.

679: 505:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/Apollo Hospitals India Representative Office Sri Lanka Medref Services

498: 4242: 4232:

I looked at the editor's other six edits, and it appears that they were trolling. Given that the user was also

4196: 4030: 3936: 3868: 3825: 3766: 3749: 3516: 3481: 3419: 3344: 3242: 3222: 3163: 3092: 3036: 2979: 2891: 2827: 2775: 2732: 2695: 2663:

It's notes 2 and 3 that I contend argue reliably & independently for his notability. Are they not enough ?

2652: 2574: 2505: 2358: 2317: 2281: 2155: 2100: 2060: 1976: 1898: 1819: 1742: 1702: 1666: 1540: 1476: 1282: 1264: 1257: 1243: 1205: 1115: 1087: 1014: 986: 931: 837: 802: 755: 700: 585: 494: 383: 331: 302: 249: 189: 47: 17: 3277:(© 2011 Ill Roc Records. All Rights Reserved). Further comparison shows the text was taken verbatim. Deleted. 1039: 441: 112: 1381: 413: 407: 3950: 3907: 3365: 3295:

That said, I agree with the procedural point, linking the source in the template makes our job much easier.

3015: 2949: 2903: 2867: 2294: 2259: 1791:

Institute of Rural Management (IRM) was established in 1993 as the Human Resource Development (HRD) unit of

624:

This really needs someone with a better knowledge of German television (and the German language) than I have

273: 3984: 3785: 3377: 3157:

for details on adding book citations. If you have any questions, I would be more than happy to help. Best,

3007: 2941: 2925:

existing article, although now that I've seen the paucity of online information for him the omission seems

2586: 2530: 2251: 1922: 1710: 1134: 1006: 547: 543: 420:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 265: 147:

any sources or references. As Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia, all information needs to be written in a

4279: 3597: 3580: 3562: 1926: 572: 571:. It would be better to add this brief article on a particular representative office to the main article, 362: 2866:

Thus, is it safe to revert that edit, or do some external tools (or something) depend on new behavior? --

1083: 4291: 4162:

There are two main concerns with the article. Firstly, the subject doesn't demonstrate why it meets the

3385: 3296: 3278: 3114: 2594: 2538: 2451: 1752: 1714: 1675: 1605: 1596: 1579: 1569: 1516: 1485: 1451: 567:

I am not really sure a separate article is warranted. On it's own, this subject really doesn't meet the

370: 4334: 4013: 1172: 366: 3381: 2590: 2534: 2523: 1806: 4311: 4298: 4253: 4217: 4077: 3883: 3852: 3496: 3453: 3445: 3328: 3202: 3194: 3186: 3178: 3134: 3026:

I have moved the article to articlespace. With any luck, someone will eventually expand the article.

2671: 2631: 2375: 2333: 1309: 904: 886: 815: 783: 768: 729: 667: 1498: 1138: 4237: 4191: 4190:

and should not be used. If you have any questions, I would be more than happy to assist you. Best,

4025: 3931: 3863: 3820: 3744: 3726: 3511: 3476: 3414: 3339: 3237: 3218: 3158: 3087: 3027: 2970: 2882: 2818: 2766: 2723: 2643: 2565: 2496: 2475: 2349: 2308: 2272: 2177: 2146: 2091: 2051: 1967: 1889: 1810: 1733: 1693: 1657: 1531: 1467: 1405: 1293: 1234: 1196: 1142: 1106: 1053: 1010: 977: 922: 828: 793: 746: 691: 576: 490: 374: 293: 240: 180: 122: 3789: 2325: 2268: 2167: 2047: 1160: 709: 4351: 4128: 4108: 4101: 4085: 4063: 3154: 2198: 2123: 1398:

I couldn't find a redirect request like that, but I have created the redirect nonetheless. Best,

1300: 860: 222: 3674: 3540: 961: 917:

D'oh, I forgot to add the AfD tag to the article. I relisted it on the daily log, but I didn't

630:

in itself be enough for ANYBIO.", and a second wrote "The Google news link above lists several

3793: 3593: 3576: 3558: 3264: 3189:) 22:53, 18 February 2012 (UTC)Thanks for explaining your decision; it makes sense now. Best. 2841: 2783: 2754: 2419: 2216: 2075: 2007: 1878: 1347: 1223: 455: 448: 430: 396: 351: 4175: 2719: 2561: 2520:

http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/todays-paper/tp-agri-biz-and-commodity/article1044837.ece

1689: 1176: 969: 522: 203: 176: 148: 144: 4361: 4262: 4247: 4226: 4201: 4156: 4152: 4133: 4089: 4067: 4035: 4000: 3966: 3941: 3923: 3887: 3873: 3856: 3830: 3754: 3737: 3601: 3584: 3566: 3521: 3500: 3486: 3457: 3436: 3424: 3393: 3349: 3332: 3308: 3290: 3268: 3247: 3226: 3206: 3168: 3138: 3097: 3075: 3038: 3019: 2981: 2953: 2911: 2893: 2875: 2829: 2811: 2788: 2777: 2759: 2734: 2704: 2675: 2654: 2635: 2602: 2576: 2554: 2507: 2486: 2434: 2379: 2360: 2337: 2319: 2298: 2283: 2231: 2202: 2188: 2157: 2127: 2102: 2085: 2062: 2017: 1978: 1938: 1900: 1848: 1843: 1821: 1760: 1744: 1722: 1704: 1683: 1668: 1630: 1626: 1613: 1599: 1593: 1587: 1572: 1566: 1542: 1524: 1510: 1506: 1493: 1478: 1459: 1436: 1433: 1416: 1385: 1351: 1319: 1286: 1245: 1227: 1207: 1150: 1117: 1091: 1064: 1022: 988: 955: 950: 933: 908: 890: 869: 864: 839: 819: 804: 787: 772: 757: 733: 702: 671: 587: 559: 435: 400: 385: 355: 335: 304: 277: 251: 229: 191: 130: 116: 4167: 3812: 3808: 3667: 3507: 3464: 3406: 3149: 2715: 2304: 2163: 2138: 1963: 1951: 1180: 1164: 1043: 965: 745:

to check the Google news search for reliable sources, as he is a native speaker of German.

683: 417: 215: 3879: 3848: 3778:

Could you please approve this and if not can you make a edit please if you have the time.

3492: 3449: 3441: 3324: 3198: 3190: 3182: 3174: 3130: 2806: 2667: 2627: 2620:

The sources seem to me both reliable and independent, and White's notability seems to fit

2391: 2371: 2329: 1873: 1031: 900: 882: 811: 779: 764: 725: 663: 656:

If any of the shows he created or played a significant part in, are notable, than so is he

4187: 4183: 4171: 3816: 3410: 3145: 2142: 1955: 1947: 1728: 1192: 1188: 1168: 1035: 687: 289: 285: 172: 164: 160: 156: 4143:

Hi, I would appreciate more specific guidance. The previous reviewer commented that the

3000:

PS- It is noted that Donnan is 'one of the world's foremost experts on the Moche' here:

2271:, I will not confirm or deny the accuracy of inquiries of a personal nature. Thank you, 1376:

No need to respond, I'll just wait for it to turn blue. Thanks for your help, Rgrds. --

1098: 4076:

I think the issue is now solved. Deletion tags have been removed in both articles, see

4017: 3721: 3126: 3071: 2988:

obviously be useless- possibly there's something in one of my references. (As I recall

2470: 2172: 2024:

neutral, you need to be clear as to who holds this view. You could write something like

1400: 1048: 4328: 4179: 4163: 4050:

related to Inner Tibet). Thanks to pass by if you have any comment. Here the articles:

3472: 3471:

for deletion, you left the concern = parameter blank. Generally, if a topic meets the

3402: 2134: 1184: 1102: 713: 568: 168: 152: 4347: 4123: 4081: 4059: 3109: 3049:

Hello, I've noticed you've been nominating a lot of software companies for deletion (

2849: 2194: 2119: 1042:

of the subject, and the references are also not correctly formatted in the format of

219: 1751:

Which is the secondary source that establishes he is a member of that organization?

1530:

what degrees he currently has. I'll try and eliminate the promotional tone as well.

89:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/Commitment-based Management (2nd attempt)

3260: 3125:? I mean no disrespect, but Knowledge (XXG) lists people I've never heard of (like 3066: 2411: 2208: 2070: 2002: 1869: 1343: 1219: 425: 392: 347: 98:

I am passionate about CbM, it is enormously powerful, and its results are amazing.

3001: 3275: 716:... if sources to exist (or don't), it would be helpful to have a close based on 4321:.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 4148: 4055: 4051: 3274:

The first result of a Google search with a random text sample from the page was

1836: 1622: 1502: 1429: 742: 422:

Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/User:Surturz/AdminWatch (2nd nomination)

179:. It explains how to add references to an article. I hope this helps you. Best, 126: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2765:

I don't really see any problems with the list. Do you have a specific concern?

527: 512:"This submission is not adequately supported by reliable, independent sources." 3491:

Uh-oh ... I didn't know that. Sorry. Hope I'm not blocked. Thanks. Abbythecat

2860:" doesn't seem right. I suspect that this malfunction started after your edit 2803: 2686: 532: 3148:. In order to establish the subject's notability, they need to have received 3773: 4306: 4252:

Yes, you're quite right. Silly me didn't check his history properly. --

3767:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Apurve_Mehra

3592:, thanks also to you! 719 of 729 articles were found with no problems. -- 2465: 2050:. If you have any questions, I would be more than happy to assist. Best, 167:, and the information should be removed. In order to establish a topic's 2162:

Adding to that, the article needs the references correctly formatted in

1604:

Funny thing -- that's the message I was conveying to Alpha_Quadrant...

442:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Solve_for_X

4012:

takes you to the article on LIU Global. However, there is a there is a

3844: 3837: 1329: 1884:

Yeah, I noticed that when I was reviewing today's log. I normally use

1303:

you will see it was identical to the "Synopsis" section formerly seen

660:

Does the German Knowledge (XXG) have articles for any of these things?

634:

German-language sources. Also, Friedrich is a published author, which

3122: 1907:

Trying to put together article about Canadian writer Janice MacDonald

3625: 1077:

Hello, Alpha. I submitted an article about an old arcade game named

2524:

http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2349159.ece

1872:

have fixed a few today. Might want to take a look at it. Best,

1072:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/Iron Horse (video game)

3338:

Thanks for the notice. I'll drop a note in the discussion. Best,

2846:{{disputed|The additions by user "Sholokhov"|date=February 2012}} 2564:. If you have any questions, I would be more than happy to help. 526:, Sri Lanka, 08 February 2012. Retrieved on 12 February 2012. 2. 4021: 3712:

and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog.

476:

Category:Hong Kong expatriates in the People's Republic of China

470:

Category:Hong Kong expatriates in the People's Republic of China

3463:

In order to propose something for deletion, you need to give a

2621: 4274: 3708:

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the

2745:

Was poking around new submissions and categorizing when I saw

2027: 1784: 536:, Sri Lanka, 09 February 2012. Retrieved on 12 February 2012. 518:"Services of Apollo Hospitals accessible from Sri Lanka again" 25: 2722:#9, non-free files may not be used outside of article space. 1962:(sources unaffiliated with the subject) in order to meet the 4303:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 4118:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

4100: 3702:

Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

3624: 2622:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:BIO#Creative_professionals

1328: 1274:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1256: 465:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

447: 4009: 3059:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Nu-Mega Technologies

2034:

According to <insert person/organization name here: -->

284:

Hello, I declined the article because it did not have any

4309:

history took place in 2008, resulting in the creation of

2858:

This The additions by user "Sholokhov"'s factual accuracy

1125:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/Nenad Grujičić

877:

Hi. Thanks for looking at this. Are you saying that he

2617:

Is it the citations or the notability that's at issue ?

2610:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/Jan V. White.

2113:

Question about an article rejected on notability grounds

1995:

RE: Comments from I AM EQUAL (photo documentary) article

638:

confer to notabilty: ... Rather than outright deletion,

4233: 4213: 3901: 3468: 3233: 2961: 2861: 2711: 2407: 2348:, evidently I am a "copyright nazi" now. I am honored. 2345: 1653: 1447: 1304: 918: 859:

Sorry for the late response. The fact that he won the "

824: 739: 4319:

Template:Did you know nominations/Genisys Credit Union

416:, a page you are mentioned on, has been nominated for 143:

Hello David, I declined the article because it didn't

4236:

as a sockpuppet, I removed the reference desk query.

3431:

Why am I not allowed to propose articles be deleted ?

3254:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/LordWillin

3144:

The problem is, the current references cited are not

996:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/Criss Jami

600:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Jesko Friedrich

322:? Sources have been submitted upon request. It's now 4317:

The nomination discussion and review may be seen at

4186:. Information that cannot be verified is considered 2468:

would have been impossible without your help. Best,

1191:. Information that cannot be verified is considered 202:

Is it a mistake or was you intention to link to the

3051:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject_Software/Article_alerts

1338:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Star Wars Pez

3843:I and some other editors are working on improving 1179:for instructions on how to do this). As this is a 4107:Hello, Alpha Quadrant. You have new messages at 3900:Do you have any suggestions for how to deal with 2303:And might I ask what you are basing this alleged 1805:There is plenty of news sources that verify this 1263:Hello, Alpha Quadrant. You have new messages at 720:sourcing/notability rather than "if such sources 454:Hello, Alpha Quadrant. You have new messages at 198:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Jerry Hodak 3083:Category:Software companies of the United States 724:exist". Thanks for your consideration. Best.-- 528:"Apollo Hospitals opens rep office in Sri Lanka" 3620:Articles for Creation urgently needs your help! 3555:Contributor copyright investigations/PumpkinSky 3356:Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/D-STAR_Lab 3002:http://www.utexas.edu/utpress/books/donmoc.html 2714:the file from your sandbox because the file is 1648:If you don't mind, could you please wait until 598:I wonder if it might not be possible to relist 2551:Hmm, it looks like the article did not have a 1299:Interesing situation. If you read the text of 3769:just placed a edit as had links in the body. 1183:, all information in the article needs to be 346:already on Knowledge (XXG) live yet? Thanks! 208:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (natural sciences) 8: 4305:... that the largest credit union merger in 2614:hello - Be most grateful for a steer here. 1371:List of Negro league baseball players (E–L) 1367:List of Negro league baseball players (E-L) 2938:able to gather will be somewhat helpful. 1709:The policy with greater relevance here is 4295:was updated with a fact from the article 3774:http://www.biogetica.com/tv_interview.php 3668:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 3448:) 00:30, 20 February 2012 (UTC)Abbythecat 3197:) 22:53, 18 February 2012 (UTC)Abbythecat 3181:) 22:53, 18 February 2012 (UTC)Abbythecat 2389: 1652:I am done cleaning up the article before 622:be notable. One wrote (emphasis added) " 320:Category:Chinese expatriates in Hong Kong 610:been verified to exist, or matters that 3684:Do you have a working knowledge of the 921:the tag. My apologies, it is now done. 569:notability guidelines for organizations 159:. If information cannot be verified in 4022:http://en.wikipedia.org/Global_College 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3878:Thank you for such a quick response. 3809:notability guidelines for biographies 2844:" is malfunctioning... For example, " 1964:notability guidelines for biographies 1950:, the subject needs to have received 1918:Thanks, Randy Williams Edmonton, AB 7: 3811:, the person needs to have received 1434:killing the human spirit since 2003! 682:and see if the subject has received 235:You are correct. I meant to link to 3653:submissions waiting to be reviewed. 3318:List of comics publishing companies 1423:Category:Cisco Systems acquisitions 968:largely outline the reasons. Under 237:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (people) 212:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (people) 4010:http://en.wikipedia.org/LIU_Global 3645:, in reviewing submissions in the 3401:In order to establish a subject's 2840:I have noticed that the template " 2133:In order to establish a subject's 171:, there should also be ideally be 24: 3673:Do you know what Knowledge (XXG) 2458:The Tireless Contributor Barnstar 2267:Under the guidelines laid out at 2244:A fair question, please answer it 1163:of the person, there needs to be 469: 214:? In latter case the shortcut is 4278: 3813:significant non-trivial coverage 3613: 3539: 2450: 2390: 2069: 2001: 1794:National Rural Support Programme 29: 4042:Article for creation / Deletion 3772:Apoorva is a real guy see this 3635:desperately short of reviewers! 3553:Thank you for reviewing in the 3081:Yesterday, I was going through 646:.", and a third editor wrote: " 206:section of the failed proposal 4168:significant amount of coverage 810:speaking editor I mentioned?-- 341:Atlas Shrugged Part 2 Question 210:? Or do you wanted to link to 1: 4263:19:54, 29 February 2012 (UTC) 4248:19:47, 29 February 2012 (UTC) 4227:19:42, 29 February 2012 (UTC) 4202:22:33, 28 February 2012 (UTC) 4157:18:20, 27 February 2012 (UTC) 4134:15:24, 27 February 2012 (UTC) 4090:18:45, 26 February 2012 (UTC) 4068:16:51, 26 February 2012 (UTC) 4036:03:55, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 4001:21:02, 23 February 2012 (UTC) 3967:15:00, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 3942:03:55, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 3924:17:28, 23 February 2012 (UTC) 3888:21:45, 22 February 2012 (UTC) 3874:21:22, 22 February 2012 (UTC) 3857:21:14, 22 February 2012 (UTC) 3831:17:36, 22 February 2012 (UTC) 3755:17:36, 22 February 2012 (UTC) 3738:12:25, 22 February 2012 (UTC) 3602:08:35, 28 February 2012 (UTC) 3585:10:45, 21 February 2012 (UTC) 3567:07:17, 20 February 2012 (UTC) 3522:01:07, 20 February 2012 (UTC) 3501:01:04, 20 February 2012 (UTC) 3487:00:44, 20 February 2012 (UTC) 3458:00:30, 20 February 2012 (UTC) 3425:18:50, 19 February 2012 (UTC) 3394:06:47, 19 February 2012 (UTC) 3350:01:29, 19 February 2012 (UTC) 3333:01:26, 19 February 2012 (UTC) 3309:01:43, 18 February 2012 (UTC) 3291:01:42, 18 February 2012 (UTC) 3269:01:26, 18 February 2012 (UTC) 3248:02:06, 18 February 2012 (UTC) 3227:01:25, 18 February 2012 (UTC) 3207:22:53, 18 February 2012 (UTC) 3169:02:06, 18 February 2012 (UTC) 3139:01:03, 18 February 2012 (UTC) 3098:02:06, 18 February 2012 (UTC) 3076:01:00, 18 February 2012 (UTC) 3061:are bordering on the absurd. 3039:01:58, 17 February 2012 (UTC) 3020:01:30, 17 February 2012 (UTC) 2982:00:50, 17 February 2012 (UTC) 2954:00:35, 17 February 2012 (UTC) 2912:00:54, 17 February 2012 (UTC) 2894:00:34, 17 February 2012 (UTC) 2876:00:29, 17 February 2012 (UTC) 2830:18:37, 16 February 2012 (UTC) 2812:18:31, 16 February 2012 (UTC) 2789:18:37, 16 February 2012 (UTC) 2778:01:19, 16 February 2012 (UTC) 2760:00:52, 16 February 2012 (UTC) 2741:Not sure what to do here, AQ? 2735:21:23, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 2705:21:17, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 2676:18:03, 20 February 2012 (UTC) 2655:15:45, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 2636:11:17, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 2603:09:32, 18 February 2012 (UTC) 2577:15:45, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 2508:15:45, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 2487:08:16, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 2435:17:55, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 2380:18:10, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 2361:15:45, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 2338:18:10, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 2320:08:11, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 2299:08:07, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 2284:08:00, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 2232:19:32, 16 February 2012 (UTC) 2203:07:44, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 2189:06:46, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 2158:06:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 2128:06:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 2103:00:43, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 2086:00:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 2063:00:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 2018:00:21, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 1979:00:04, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 1939:23:51, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 1901:22:54, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 1879:22:48, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 1849:22:13, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 1822:22:31, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 1767:Institute of Rural Management 1761:22:20, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 1745:22:05, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 1723:21:21, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 1705:21:16, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 1684:20:50, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 1669:20:47, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 1631:20:52, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 1614:20:34, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 1600:20:29, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 1588:20:23, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 1573:20:20, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 1543:20:18, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 1525:20:14, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 1511:20:10, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 1494:19:41, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 1479:19:38, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 1460:19:25, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 1437:17:16, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 1417:14:16, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 1386:12:13, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 1352:02:00, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 1336:Thanks for the kind words at 1320:20:23, 13 February 2012 (UTC) 1287:19:21, 13 February 2012 (UTC) 1246:16:57, 13 February 2012 (UTC) 1228:23:59, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 1208:16:57, 13 February 2012 (UTC) 1151:15:24, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 1118:16:57, 13 February 2012 (UTC) 1092:07:54, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 1065:04:24, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 1023:03:24, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 989:02:07, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 956:01:21, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 934:00:49, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 909:00:46, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 891:00:46, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 870:23:06, 13 February 2012 (UTC) 840:19:43, 13 February 2012 (UTC) 820:19:39, 13 February 2012 (UTC) 805:19:35, 13 February 2012 (UTC) 788:19:31, 13 February 2012 (UTC) 773:08:12, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 758:02:48, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 734:02:39, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 703:02:07, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 672:01:18, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 588:16:57, 13 February 2012 (UTC) 560:22:42, 11 February 2012 (UTC) 499:03:31, 11 February 2012 (UTC) 4271:DYK for Genisys Credit Union 4172:reliable third party sources 3989:SusanElizabethSmithLIUGlobal 3817:reliable third party sources 3610:Articles for Creation appeal 3510:for future reference. Best, 3411:reliable third party sources 3146:reliable third party sources 2749:which you just approved and 2464:Clearing the big backlog at 2143:reliable third party sources 2137:, it needs to have received 1301:this screening announcement, 1181:biography of a living person 1169:reliable third party sources 688:reliable third party sources 436:23:49, 9 February 2012 (UTC) 401:00:31, 9 February 2012 (UTC) 386:00:26, 9 February 2012 (UTC) 356:00:20, 9 February 2012 (UTC) 336:19:48, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 305:19:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 278:19:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 258:My article for Serge Lamothe 252:17:22, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 230:17:18, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 192:14:22, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 117:11:24, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 4073:Sorry for disturbing again, 1729:no original research policy 4377: 4212:Hi. What makes you think 3690:article naming conventions 3659:Do you have what it takes? 3119:Kolchak: The Night Stalker 1991:Thank you, Randy Williams 1265:218.250.159.25's talk page 970:non-free content criterion 361:The article is located at 4362:00:52, 1 March 2012 (UTC) 3647:pending submissions queue 3633:Articles for Creation is 3538: 3234:already been renamed once 2720:non-free content criteria 2449: 2396: 1886:User:Mr.Z-man/closeAFD.js 1446:I'm very concerned about 1195:, and should be removed. 1177:Referencing for beginners 976:considerations in mind.) 487:Categories for discussion 311:Category creation request 177:referencing for beginners 4080:for more information. -- 650:that's a notable award, 324:near the top of the page 163:, then it is considered 18:User talk:Alpha Quadrant 4339:Did you know? talk page 3467:for deletion. When you 3405:needs to have received 3117:? You've never watched 3108:Hi, saw my article for 1214:Editing First Paragraph 680:this google news search 414:User:Surturz/AdminWatch 408:User:Surturz/AdminWatch 4105: 3710:reviewing instructions 3666:Are you familiar with 3629: 3360:Dear Alpha Quadrant, 3232:The file had actually 2681:Uhh... Thanks, I guess 2400:The Copyright Barnstar 1333: 1261: 942:Non-free image gallery 573:Apollo Hospitals India 452: 363:Atlas Shrugged: Part 2 315:Could you help review 4176:neutral point of view 4164:notability guidelines 4104: 3628: 3473:notability guidelines 3367:Thank you very much. 3115:Rebel Without A Cause 2962:highlighted them here 2562:neutral point of view 1654:slapping more tags up 1332: 1260: 1252:Re: Category requests 1103:notability guidelines 962:Knowledge (XXG):Logos 451: 371:Atlas Shrugged Part 2 149:neutral point of view 121:— Comment moved from 42:of past discussions. 4312:Genisys Credit Union 4299:Genisys Credit Union 4109:NCISfan2's talk page 3765:My friend made this 3649:. Currently the are 3508:Reasons for deletion 3407:significant coverage 3150:significant coverage 2305:conflicting interest 2139:significant coverage 2068:that's okay. Thanks 1952:significant coverage 1165:significant coverage 684:significant coverage 654:the guy is notable. 614:be notable, but had 482:the category's entry 3643:experienced editors 3637:We are looking for 3469:tagged the articles 3212:Paulinskill Viaduct 2836:Template "Disputed" 2443:A barnstar for you! 1307:I have removed it. 456:Fumitol's talk page 365:. I have created a 123:User:Alpha Quadrant 4178:and based on fact 4116:remove this notice 4106: 3952:RepublicanJacobite 3909:RepublicanJacobite 3781:Thank you so much 3630: 3155:Template:Cite book 3045:Software companies 2848:" (as in article " 2324:@The anon IP; Per 1334: 1272:remove this notice 1262: 463:remove this notice 453: 406:MfD nomination of 4345: 4344: 4332: 4188:original research 4004: 3987:comment added by 3802: 3788:comment added by 3717: 3716: 3572: 3571: 3397: 3380:comment added by 3010:comment added by 2944:comment added by 2904:Martynas Patasius 2868:Martynas Patasius 2702: 2693: 2606: 2589:comment added by 2547: 2533:comment added by 2492: 2491: 2440: 2439: 2254:comment added by 2048:non-neutral words 2042: 2041: 1942: 1925:comment added by 1803: 1802: 1394:talk page stalker 1325:A kitten for you! 1193:original research 1154: 1137:comment added by 1026: 1009:comment added by 563: 546:comment added by 489:page. Thank you. 434: 268:comment added by 165:original research 139: 95:delivered by CbM 85: 84: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 4368: 4322: 4282: 4275: 4245: 4240: 4199: 4194: 4184:reliable sources 4131: 4126: 4119: 4033: 4028: 4003: 3981: 3965: 3961: 3953: 3939: 3934: 3922: 3918: 3910: 3871: 3866: 3828: 3823: 3801: 3782: 3752: 3747: 3736: 3734: 3729: 3724: 3614: 3543: 3536: 3535: 3519: 3514: 3484: 3479: 3437:Crackle of Death 3422: 3417: 3396: 3374: 3347: 3342: 3305: 3299: 3298:CharlieEchoTango 3287: 3281: 3280:CharlieEchoTango 3245: 3240: 3166: 3161: 3095: 3090: 3067:meta:Eventualism 3034: 3022: 2977: 2956: 2889: 2825: 2809: 2786: 2773: 2757: 2730: 2700: 2696: 2692: 2687: 2650: 2605: 2583: 2572: 2558: 2546: 2527: 2503: 2485: 2483: 2478: 2473: 2454: 2447: 2446: 2432: 2424: 2416: 2394: 2387: 2386: 2356: 2315: 2279: 2263: 2229: 2221: 2213: 2187: 2185: 2180: 2175: 2164:inline citations 2153: 2098: 2081: 2080: 2073: 2058: 2028: 2013: 2012: 2005: 1974: 1948:reliable sources 1941: 1919: 1896: 1841: 1817: 1785: 1753:Nomoskedasticity 1740: 1715:Nomoskedasticity 1700: 1676:Nomoskedasticity 1664: 1623:Kevin Rutherford 1606:Nomoskedasticity 1580:Nomoskedasticity 1538: 1517:Nomoskedasticity 1503:Kevin Rutherford 1486:Nomoskedasticity 1474: 1452:Nomoskedasticity 1415: 1413: 1408: 1403: 1397: 1312: 1275: 1241: 1203: 1189:reliable sources 1153: 1131: 1113: 1063: 1061: 1056: 1051: 1044:inline citations 1036:reliable sources 1025: 1003: 984: 929: 835: 800: 753: 698: 583: 562: 548:Harshasubhashana 540: 466: 428: 381: 317:the request for 300: 286:reliable sources 280: 247: 187: 173:reliable sources 161:reliable sources 157:reliable sources 138: 119: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4376: 4375: 4371: 4370: 4369: 4367: 4366: 4365: 4273: 4254:Finlay McWalter 4243: 4238: 4218:Finlay McWalter 4210: 4208:WP:RD/C revert? 4197: 4192: 4141: 4129: 4124: 4120: 4113: 4098: 4044: 4031: 4026: 3982: 3977: 3964: 3959: 3951: 3948: 3937: 3932: 3921: 3916: 3908: 3905: 3898: 3869: 3864: 3841: 3826: 3821: 3783: 3763: 3750: 3745: 3732: 3727: 3722: 3720: 3688:, particularly 3686:Manual of Style 3661: 3623: 3612: 3534: 3517: 3512: 3482: 3477: 3433: 3420: 3415: 3375: 3358: 3345: 3340: 3321: 3303: 3297: 3285: 3279: 3256: 3243: 3238: 3214: 3164: 3159: 3106: 3093: 3088: 3047: 3028: 3005: 2971: 2939: 2922: 2883: 2852:") results in " 2838: 2819: 2807: 2799: 2797:Speedy deletion 2784: 2767: 2755: 2743: 2724: 2698: 2688: 2683: 2644: 2612: 2584: 2566: 2552: 2528: 2516: 2514:morarka organic 2497: 2481: 2476: 2471: 2469: 2445: 2428: 2420: 2412: 2350: 2309: 2273: 2249: 2246: 2225: 2217: 2209: 2183: 2178: 2173: 2171: 2166:and also needs 2147: 2115: 2092: 2078: 2076: 2052: 2010: 2008: 1997: 1968: 1927:RandywilliamsCA 1920: 1909: 1890: 1865: 1862: 1837: 1811: 1796: 1734: 1694: 1658: 1532: 1468: 1444: 1430:Smerdis of Tlön 1425: 1411: 1406: 1401: 1399: 1391: 1360: 1327: 1310: 1297: 1276: 1269: 1254: 1235: 1216: 1197: 1132: 1128: 1107: 1075: 1059: 1054: 1049: 1047: 1004: 999: 978: 944: 923: 829: 794: 747: 692: 596: 577: 541: 508: 472: 467: 460: 445: 411: 375: 343: 313: 294: 290:reliable source 263: 260: 241: 227: 226:about my edits? 220:Armbrust, B.Ed. 200: 181: 120: 92: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4374: 4372: 4343: 4342: 4333:and add it to 4283: 4272: 4269: 4268: 4267: 4266: 4265: 4239:Alpha_Quadrant 4209: 4206: 4205: 4204: 4193:Alpha_Quadrant 4140: 4137: 4112: 4099: 4097: 4094: 4093: 4092: 4074: 4043: 4040: 4039: 4038: 4027:Alpha_Quadrant 4018:Global College 3976: 3973: 3972: 3971: 3970: 3969: 3956: 3933:Alpha_Quadrant 3913: 3897: 3894: 3893: 3892: 3891: 3890: 3865:Alpha_Quadrant 3840: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3822:Alpha_Quadrant 3762: 3759: 3758: 3757: 3746:Alpha_Quadrant 3715: 3714: 3706: 3705: 3700: 3693: 3682: 3671: 3663: 3662: 3657: 3631: 3617: 3611: 3608: 3607: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3570: 3569: 3550: 3549: 3547:reviewing eyes 3544: 3533: 3530: 3529: 3528: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3524: 3513:Alpha_Quadrant 3478:Alpha_Quadrant 3432: 3429: 3428: 3427: 3416:Alpha_Quadrant 3370:Best regards, 3357: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3341:Alpha_Quadrant 3320: 3315: 3314: 3313: 3312: 3311: 3255: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3239:Alpha_Quadrant 3219:Martindelaware 3213: 3210: 3172: 3171: 3160:Alpha_Quadrant 3127:Richard Hanley 3105: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3089:Alpha_Quadrant 3046: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3031:Alpha_Quadrant 2990:Lords of Sipan 2985: 2984: 2974:Alpha_Quadrant 2921: 2920:Donnan article 2918: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2897: 2896: 2886:Alpha_Quadrant 2837: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2822:Alpha_Quadrant 2798: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2770:Alpha_Quadrant 2742: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2727:Alpha_Quadrant 2682: 2679: 2658: 2657: 2647:Alpha_Quadrant 2626:With thanks 2611: 2608: 2580: 2579: 2569:Alpha_Quadrant 2515: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2500:Alpha_Quadrant 2490: 2489: 2461: 2460: 2455: 2444: 2441: 2438: 2437: 2408:Copyright Nazi 2403: 2402: 2397: 2395: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2353:Alpha_Quadrant 2342: 2341: 2340: 2322: 2312:Alpha_Quadrant 2286: 2276:Alpha_Quadrant 2245: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2150:Alpha_Quadrant 2114: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2095:Alpha_Quadrant 2055:Alpha_Quadrant 2040: 2039: 2036: 2032: 2026: 2025: 1996: 1993: 1984: 1982: 1981: 1971:Alpha_Quadrant 1908: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1893:Alpha_Quadrant 1864: 1863:Relisted AfD's 1861: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1814:Alpha_Quadrant 1801: 1800: 1797: 1792: 1789: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1737:Alpha_Quadrant 1697:Alpha_Quadrant 1661:Alpha_Quadrant 1646: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1535:Alpha_Quadrant 1471:Alpha_Quadrant 1443: 1442:Crappy article 1440: 1424: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1374: 1373: 1359: 1356: 1354: 1326: 1323: 1296: 1290: 1279:218.250.159.25 1268: 1255: 1253: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1238:Alpha_Quadrant 1215: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1200:Alpha_Quadrant 1127: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1110:Alpha_Quadrant 1084:Beacon of Hope 1074: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1011:TheKILLOSOPHER 998: 993: 992: 991: 981:Alpha_Quadrant 943: 940: 939: 938: 937: 936: 926:Alpha_Quadrant 912: 911: 896: 895: 894: 893: 857: 856: 855: 854: 853: 852: 851: 850: 849: 848: 847: 846: 845: 844: 843: 842: 832:Alpha_Quadrant 797:Alpha_Quadrant 750:Alpha_Quadrant 695:Alpha_Quadrant 606:exist but had 595: 592: 591: 590: 580:Alpha_Quadrant 507: 502: 491:SchmuckyTheCat 471: 468: 459: 446: 444: 439: 410: 404: 389: 388: 378:Alpha_Quadrant 342: 339: 328:218.250.159.25 312: 309: 308: 307: 297:Alpha_Quadrant 259: 256: 255: 254: 244:Alpha_Quadrant 225: 199: 196: 195: 194: 184:Alpha_Quadrant 109:86.178.156.131 91: 86: 83: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4373: 4364: 4363: 4359: 4356: 4353: 4349: 4340: 4336: 4330: 4326: 4320: 4316: 4314: 4313: 4308: 4302: 4301: 4300: 4294: 4293: 4292:Did you know? 4288: 4284: 4281: 4277: 4276: 4270: 4264: 4261: 4258: 4255: 4251: 4250: 4249: 4246: 4241: 4235: 4231: 4230: 4229: 4228: 4225: 4222: 4219: 4215: 4207: 4203: 4200: 4195: 4189: 4185: 4181: 4177: 4173: 4169: 4165: 4161: 4160: 4159: 4158: 4154: 4150: 4146: 4138: 4136: 4135: 4132: 4127: 4117: 4110: 4103: 4095: 4091: 4087: 4083: 4079: 4075: 4072: 4071: 4070: 4069: 4065: 4061: 4057: 4053: 4047: 4041: 4037: 4034: 4029: 4023: 4019: 4015: 4011: 4007: 4006: 4005: 4002: 3998: 3994: 3990: 3986: 3974: 3968: 3963: 3962: 3955: 3954: 3945: 3944: 3943: 3940: 3935: 3928: 3927: 3926: 3925: 3920: 3919: 3912: 3911: 3903: 3895: 3889: 3885: 3881: 3877: 3876: 3875: 3872: 3867: 3861: 3860: 3859: 3858: 3854: 3850: 3846: 3839: 3836: 3832: 3829: 3824: 3818: 3814: 3810: 3805: 3804: 3803: 3799: 3795: 3791: 3787: 3779: 3776: 3775: 3770: 3768: 3760: 3756: 3753: 3748: 3742: 3741: 3740: 3739: 3735: 3730: 3725: 3713: 3711: 3704: 3701: 3698: 3697:autoconfirmed 3694: 3691: 3687: 3683: 3680: 3676: 3672: 3669: 3665: 3664: 3660: 3656: 3655: 3654: 3652: 3648: 3644: 3640: 3636: 3627: 3622: 3621: 3616: 3615: 3609: 3603: 3599: 3595: 3591: 3588: 3587: 3586: 3582: 3578: 3575:Thank you! -- 3574: 3573: 3568: 3564: 3560: 3556: 3552: 3551: 3548: 3545: 3542: 3537: 3531: 3523: 3520: 3515: 3509: 3504: 3503: 3502: 3498: 3494: 3490: 3489: 3488: 3485: 3480: 3474: 3470: 3466: 3465:policy reason 3462: 3461: 3460: 3459: 3455: 3451: 3447: 3443: 3438: 3430: 3426: 3423: 3418: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3395: 3391: 3387: 3383: 3379: 3371: 3368: 3366: 3361: 3355: 3351: 3348: 3343: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3330: 3326: 3319: 3316: 3310: 3306: 3300: 3294: 3293: 3292: 3288: 3282: 3276: 3273: 3272: 3271: 3270: 3266: 3262: 3253: 3249: 3246: 3241: 3235: 3231: 3230: 3229: 3228: 3224: 3220: 3211: 3209: 3208: 3204: 3200: 3196: 3192: 3188: 3184: 3180: 3176: 3170: 3167: 3162: 3156: 3151: 3147: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3136: 3132: 3128: 3124: 3120: 3116: 3111: 3110:Jack Grinnage 3104:jack grinnage 3103: 3099: 3096: 3091: 3084: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3074: 3073: 3068: 3062: 3060: 3056: 3052: 3044: 3040: 3037: 3035: 3033: 3032: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3021: 3017: 3013: 3012:71.23.139.241 3009: 3003: 2998: 2994: 2991: 2983: 2980: 2978: 2976: 2975: 2967: 2963: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2955: 2951: 2947: 2946:71.23.139.241 2943: 2937: 2931: 2928: 2919: 2913: 2909: 2905: 2902:Thank you. -- 2901: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2895: 2892: 2890: 2888: 2887: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2873: 2869: 2864: 2862: 2859: 2855: 2851: 2850:Georgy Zhukov 2847: 2843: 2835: 2831: 2828: 2826: 2824: 2823: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2810: 2805: 2796: 2790: 2787: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2776: 2774: 2772: 2771: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2758: 2752: 2748: 2740: 2736: 2733: 2731: 2729: 2728: 2721: 2717: 2713: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2703: 2694: 2691: 2680: 2678: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2664: 2661: 2656: 2653: 2651: 2649: 2648: 2640: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2633: 2629: 2624: 2623: 2618: 2615: 2609: 2607: 2604: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2578: 2575: 2573: 2571: 2570: 2563: 2556: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2525: 2521: 2513: 2509: 2506: 2504: 2502: 2501: 2494: 2493: 2488: 2484: 2479: 2474: 2467: 2463: 2462: 2459: 2456: 2453: 2448: 2442: 2436: 2433: 2431: 2425: 2423: 2417: 2415: 2409: 2406:For being a ' 2405: 2404: 2401: 2398: 2393: 2388: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2369: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2359: 2357: 2355: 2354: 2347: 2343: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2321: 2318: 2316: 2314: 2313: 2306: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2291:72.76.226.140 2287: 2285: 2282: 2280: 2278: 2277: 2270: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2261: 2257: 2256:72.76.226.140 2253: 2243: 2233: 2230: 2228: 2222: 2220: 2214: 2212: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2186: 2181: 2176: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2156: 2154: 2152: 2151: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2125: 2121: 2112: 2104: 2101: 2099: 2097: 2096: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2083: 2082: 2072: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2061: 2059: 2057: 2056: 2049: 2044: 2043: 2033: 2029: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2015: 2014: 2004: 1994: 1992: 1989: 1986: 1980: 1977: 1975: 1973: 1972: 1965: 1961: 1960:party sources 1959: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1928: 1924: 1916: 1912: 1906: 1902: 1899: 1897: 1895: 1894: 1887: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1877: 1876: 1871: 1850: 1847: 1846: 1842: 1840: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1820: 1818: 1816: 1815: 1808: 1795: 1790: 1786: 1768: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1743: 1741: 1739: 1738: 1730: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1711:WP:BLPPRIMARY 1708: 1707: 1706: 1703: 1701: 1699: 1698: 1691: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1667: 1665: 1663: 1662: 1655: 1651: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1598: 1595: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1571: 1568: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1544: 1541: 1539: 1537: 1536: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1477: 1475: 1473: 1472: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1441: 1439: 1438: 1435: 1431: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1409: 1404: 1395: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1378:64.85.220.210 1372: 1368: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1357: 1355: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1339: 1331: 1324: 1322: 1321: 1318: 1317: 1314: 1313: 1306: 1302: 1295: 1294:Him Ganga Hum 1291: 1289: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1273: 1266: 1259: 1251: 1247: 1244: 1242: 1240: 1239: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1213: 1209: 1206: 1204: 1202: 1201: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1126: 1123: 1119: 1116: 1114: 1112: 1111: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1080: 1073: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1057: 1052: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1030:With {{subst: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1008: 997: 994: 990: 987: 985: 983: 982: 975: 971: 967: 963: 960: 959: 958: 957: 954: 953: 952: 941: 935: 932: 930: 928: 927: 920: 916: 915: 914: 913: 910: 906: 902: 898: 897: 892: 888: 884: 880: 876: 875: 874: 873: 872: 871: 868: 867: 862: 841: 838: 836: 834: 833: 826: 823: 822: 821: 817: 813: 808: 807: 806: 803: 801: 799: 798: 791: 790: 789: 785: 781: 776: 775: 774: 770: 766: 761: 760: 759: 756: 754: 752: 751: 744: 741: 737: 736: 735: 731: 727: 723: 719: 715: 711: 706: 705: 704: 701: 699: 697: 696: 689: 685: 681: 676: 675: 674: 673: 669: 665: 661: 657: 653: 649: 645: 641: 637: 633: 629: 625: 621: 617: 613: 609: 605: 601: 593: 589: 586: 584: 582: 581: 574: 570: 566: 565: 564: 561: 557: 553: 549: 545: 537: 535: 534: 529: 525: 524: 519: 514: 513: 506: 503: 501: 500: 496: 492: 488: 484: 483: 478: 477: 464: 457: 450: 443: 440: 438: 437: 432: 427: 423: 419: 415: 409: 405: 403: 402: 398: 394: 387: 384: 382: 380: 379: 372: 368: 364: 360: 359: 358: 357: 353: 349: 340: 338: 337: 333: 329: 325: 321: 318: 310: 306: 303: 301: 299: 298: 291: 287: 283: 282: 281: 279: 275: 271: 270:184.161.54.33 267: 257: 253: 250: 248: 246: 245: 238: 234: 233: 232: 231: 228: 223: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 197: 193: 190: 188: 186: 185: 178: 174: 170: 166: 162: 158: 154: 150: 146: 142: 141: 140: 136: 132: 128: 124: 118: 114: 110: 105: 102: 99: 96: 90: 87: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4354: 4346: 4310: 4304: 4297: 4296: 4290: 4287:1 March 2012 4256: 4220: 4211: 4142: 4139:AfC/Porticor 4121: 4048: 4045: 3983:— Preceding 3978: 3960:TheFortyFive 3957: 3949: 3917:TheFortyFive 3914: 3906: 3899: 3842: 3784:— Preceding 3780: 3777: 3771: 3764: 3761:Apurve Mehra 3718: 3707: 3703: 3658: 3650: 3642: 3638: 3634: 3632: 3618: 3594:Gerda Arendt 3577:Gerda Arendt 3559:Gerda Arendt 3546: 3434: 3376:— Preceding 3372: 3369: 3362: 3359: 3322: 3257: 3215: 3173: 3107: 3070: 3063: 3054: 3048: 3030: 3029: 3006:— Preceding 2999: 2995: 2989: 2986: 2973: 2972: 2965: 2940:— Preceding 2935: 2932: 2926: 2923: 2885: 2884: 2865: 2857: 2853: 2845: 2839: 2821: 2820: 2800: 2769: 2768: 2744: 2726: 2725: 2689: 2684: 2665: 2662: 2659: 2646: 2645: 2625: 2619: 2616: 2613: 2585:— Preceding 2581: 2568: 2567: 2529:— Preceding 2517: 2499: 2498: 2457: 2429: 2421: 2413: 2399: 2367: 2352: 2351: 2311: 2310: 2275: 2274: 2250:— Preceding 2247: 2226: 2218: 2210: 2168:wikification 2149: 2148: 2116: 2094: 2093: 2074: 2054: 2053: 2006: 1998: 1990: 1987: 1983: 1970: 1969: 1957: 1921:— Preceding 1917: 1913: 1910: 1892: 1891: 1874: 1866: 1844: 1838: 1813: 1812: 1804: 1793: 1736: 1735: 1696: 1695: 1660: 1659: 1649: 1647: 1534: 1533: 1470: 1469: 1445: 1426: 1375: 1361: 1342: 1335: 1315: 1308: 1298: 1277: 1237: 1236: 1217: 1199: 1198: 1133:— Preceding 1129: 1109: 1108: 1078: 1076: 1005:— Preceding 1000: 980: 979: 973: 949: 948: 945: 925: 924: 878: 865: 861:Grimme Preis 858: 831: 830: 796: 795: 749: 748: 721: 717: 694: 693: 659: 655: 651: 647: 643: 639: 635: 631: 627: 623: 619: 615: 611: 607: 603: 597: 579: 578: 542:— Preceding 538: 531: 521: 515: 511: 509: 480: 474: 473: 412: 390: 377: 376: 344: 314: 296: 295: 264:— Preceding 261: 243: 242: 201: 183: 182: 106: 103: 100: 97: 93: 78: 43: 37: 4329:quick check 4056:Outer Tibet 4052:Inner Tibet 3639:urgent help 3382:Tuananh1988 2969:statement. 2856:"... That " 2690:Devin Davis 2591:Arjunnair85 2535:Arjunnair85 2346:interesting 1688:Please see 1594:Tagishsimon 1567:Tagishsimon 1040:independent 951:GreenwoodKL 743:User:Mabdul 36:This is an 4325:here's how 4180:verifiable 3975:LIU Global 3896:Rude anon. 3880:Cloveapple 3849:Cloveapple 3493:Abbythecat 3450:Abbythecat 3442:Abbythecat 3403:notability 3373:Tuan Anh 3325:Cloveapple 3199:Abbythecat 3191:Abbythecat 3183:Abbythecat 3175:Abbythecat 3131:Abbythecat 2668:Ekphraster 2628:Ekphraster 2372:Hammersoft 2330:Hammersoft 2135:notability 1985:Hi again, 1845:talk to me 1185:verifiable 1161:notability 1079:Iron Horse 901:Epeefleche 883:Epeefleche 812:Epeefleche 780:Epeefleche 765:Epeefleche 726:Epeefleche 718:verifiable 664:Epeefleche 533:Daily News 326:. Thanks. 169:notability 153:verifiable 79:Archive 14 73:Archive 13 68:Archive 12 60:Archive 10 4008:The URL, 3902:this user 3590:It's over 3055:currently 2370:honor! -- 2326:WP:OUTING 2269:WP:OUTING 1956:reliable 1173:footnotes 1139:Milenagru 1038:that are 710:WP:RELIST 632:potential 4358:contribs 4348:Casliber 4335:DYKSTATS 4307:Michigan 4125:NCISfan2 4122:Thanks! 4114:You can 4082:Pseudois 4060:Pseudois 4014:redirect 3997:contribs 3985:unsigned 3798:contribs 3786:unsigned 3695:Are you 3532:Precious 3390:contribs 3378:unsigned 3008:unsigned 2966:numerous 2942:unsigned 2927:slightly 2842:Disputed 2785::- ) DCS 2756::- ) DCS 2718:. Under 2716:non-free 2599:contribs 2587:unsigned 2543:contribs 2531:unsigned 2466:CAT:PEND 2252:unsigned 2195:Outis010 2120:Outis010 2077:Steinway 2009:Steinway 1935:contribs 1923:unsigned 1311:Schmidt, 1270:You can 1147:contribs 1135:unsigned 1099:Gamefaqs 1019:contribs 1007:unsigned 556:contribs 544:unsigned 461:You can 418:deletion 391:THANKS! 367:redirect 266:unsigned 135:contribs 4234:blocked 4145:article 4096:Message 3845:Tharasu 3838:Tharasu 3790:Mattseo 3641:, from 3304:contact 3286:contact 3261:Nyttend 2712:removed 2666:Thanks 2555:reflist 2414:Fumitol 2211:Fumitol 1870:Snotbot 1807:example 1690:WP:PSTS 1499:SOFIXIT 1369:==: --> 1344:Bearian 1220:Nsb2421 879:himself 738:I have 722:were to 523:DailyFT 485:on the 426:Toddst1 393:JR00576 348:JR00576 204:WP:NBIO 39:archive 4244:(talk) 4198:(talk) 4130:(talk) 4032:(talk) 3938:(talk) 3870:(talk) 3827:(talk) 3751:(talk) 3679:is not 3518:(talk) 3483:(talk) 3421:(talk) 3346:(talk) 3244:(talk) 3165:(talk) 3123:Scrubs 3094:(talk) 2368:horror 1839:Pol430 1597:(talk) 1570:(talk) 1032:submit 966:WP:NFG 866:mabdul 628:it may 216:WP:BIO 127:Mabdul 107:David 104:Help! 4149:Yaron 4020:, so 3728:music 2477:music 2344:mhm, 2179:music 1958:third 1650:after 1407:music 1305:here. 1292:inre 1175:(see 1055:music 974:legal 919:readd 740:asked 620:might 612:might 604:might 594:Query 16:< 4352:talk 4260:Talk 4224:Talk 4214:this 4153:talk 4086:talk 4078:here 4064:talk 4058:. -- 4046:Hi, 3993:talk 3884:talk 3853:talk 3794:talk 3677:and 3651:1341 3598:talk 3581:talk 3563:talk 3497:talk 3454:talk 3446:talk 3386:talk 3329:talk 3265:talk 3223:talk 3203:talk 3195:talk 3187:talk 3179:talk 3135:talk 3072:Ruud 3016:talk 2950:talk 2908:talk 2872:talk 2804:Wily 2751:this 2747:this 2699:talk 2672:talk 2632:talk 2595:talk 2539:talk 2522:and 2430:cont 2422:talk 2376:talk 2334:talk 2307:on? 2295:talk 2260:talk 2227:cont 2219:talk 2199:talk 2170:. -- 2124:talk 2079:1701 2011:1701 1931:talk 1911:Hi, 1875:—SW— 1757:talk 1719:talk 1680:talk 1627:talk 1610:talk 1584:talk 1521:talk 1507:talk 1490:talk 1456:talk 1448:this 1382:talk 1348:talk 1283:talk 1224:talk 1143:talk 1088:talk 1046:. -- 1015:talk 964:and 905:talk 887:talk 825:Done 816:talk 784:talk 769:talk 730:talk 714:wp:v 668:talk 652:then 642:... 552:talk 495:talk 431:talk 397:talk 352:talk 332:talk 274:talk 151:and 145:cite 131:talk 113:talk 4285:On 4182:in 4170:in 4016:at 3947:--- 3815:in 3733:ian 3409:in 3121:or 3069:. — 2936:was 2482:ian 2184:ian 2141:in 1954:in 1412:ian 1358:F/U 1187:in 1167:in 1060:ian 686:in 658:. 636:may 616:not 608:not 516:1. 369:at 155:in 125:by 4360:) 4327:, 4289:, 4155:) 4088:) 4066:) 4054:, 3999:) 3995:• 3886:) 3855:) 3800:) 3796:• 3719:-- 3675:is 3600:) 3583:) 3565:) 3499:) 3456:) 3392:) 3388:• 3331:) 3307:) 3289:) 3267:) 3225:) 3205:) 3137:) 3018:) 2952:) 2910:) 2874:) 2710:I 2674:) 2634:) 2601:) 2597:• 2557:}} 2553:{{ 2545:) 2541:• 2410:' 2378:) 2336:) 2297:) 2262:) 2201:) 2126:) 2084:| 2038:” 2031:“ 2016:| 1937:) 1933:• 1809:. 1799:” 1788:“ 1759:) 1721:) 1682:) 1656:? 1629:) 1612:) 1586:) 1523:) 1509:) 1501:. 1492:) 1458:) 1432:- 1384:) 1350:) 1340:. 1285:) 1226:) 1149:) 1145:• 1090:) 1021:) 1017:• 907:) 889:) 818:) 786:) 771:) 732:) 670:) 648:If 575:. 558:) 554:• 530:, 520:, 497:) 424:. 399:) 354:) 334:) 276:) 218:. 137:) 133:• 115:) 64:← 4355:· 4350:( 4341:. 4331:) 4323:( 4315:? 4257:ჷ 4221:ჷ 4151:( 4111:. 4084:( 4062:( 3991:( 3882:( 3851:( 3792:( 3723:B 3699:? 3692:? 3681:? 3670:? 3596:( 3579:( 3561:( 3495:( 3452:( 3444:( 3384:( 3327:( 3301:( 3283:( 3263:( 3221:( 3201:( 3193:( 3185:( 3177:( 3133:( 3014:( 2948:( 2906:( 2870:( 2808:D 2701:) 2697:( 2670:( 2630:( 2593:( 2537:( 2472:B 2426:| 2418:| 2374:( 2332:( 2293:( 2258:( 2223:| 2215:| 2197:( 2174:B 2122:( 1929:( 1769:. 1755:( 1717:( 1678:( 1625:( 1608:( 1582:( 1519:( 1505:( 1488:( 1454:( 1402:B 1396:) 1392:( 1380:( 1346:( 1281:( 1267:. 1222:( 1141:( 1086:( 1050:B 1013:( 947:— 903:( 885:( 814:( 782:( 767:( 728:( 666:( 550:( 493:( 458:. 433:) 429:( 395:( 350:( 330:( 272:( 129:( 111:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index