Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:AlysonDutch

Source 📝

378: 110: 656:
citation". In most cases what you put was simply the name of a topic -- perhaps you intended to link to a related wikipedia article. this is down with double square brackets, not with ref tags. For example, if I wanted to write in an article "A Media Introduction event is a very important tool in public relations." and to link the words "public relations", I would code that as follows:
237:, I noticed there was a habit in your editing of adding information without "reliable sources." Reliable sources are things like media, books and scholarly works that Knowledge (XXG) trusts to be accurate and neutral. The most important part of adding new information is citing where the information came from. You can do this just by adding <ref: --> 329: 792:{{cite journal |last1=Jones |first1=Jane |last2=Smith |first2=Fred |year=2011 |month=June |title=An Anatomy of Media Introductions |journal=Journal of Public Relations Professionals |volume=28 |issue=7 |page=69 |publisher=Megadyne Publishing |url=http://megadyne.com/JPRP/28/7/Anatomy.html |accessdate=29 August 2012}}</ref: --> 711:. If this is a book, the page number is essential, and the author, date and publisher are also needed. At the very least enough information that a motivated reader could find the specific passage you rely on in a library is essential. Suppose, for example, i wanted to cite my example sentence above to an article in the (invented) 722:{{cite journal |last1=Jones |first1=Jane |last2=Smith |first2=Fred |year=2011 |month=June |title=An Anatomy of Media Introductions |journal=Journal of Public Relations Professionals |volume=28 |issue=7 |page=69 |publisher=Megadyne Publishing |url=http://megadyne.com/JPRP/28/7/Anatomy.html |accessdate=29 August 2012}} 698:
and can never serve as a citation. There are several reasons for this. One is the dangers of circular citation, where article A cites articel B an B cites A, and nowhere is there a sound indication of where the information actually came from. There are other good reasons for this rule as well. In any
435:
I did receive your note, as i think you will see if you read my talk page. I do have email, and you can use the "Email this User" feature if you so choose. However I much prefer to conduct any Knowledge (XXG) business on-wiki, and if you email me I will quite likely post the contents here unless they
655:
You placed the slash after rather than before the closing ref tag and in at least one case omitted the opening angle bracket (<). Those are minor formatting issues which could be (and in fact were) rapidly corrected by another more experienced editor. The real problem was with the "details of the
554:
The formatting of cations is a secondary matter -- if the information is there, more experienced editors can and will do the required formatting. What is essential is to provide information on what specific source supports a given statement: what publication, on what date, by what author or entity.
501:
OK, I understand the citations concept. What I don’t understand is now to hyperlink them. My article is filled with links, all "Wiki-approved" kinds of articles from mainstream publications, like Forbes and professional associations like the Public Relations Society of America, etc. I guess that I
518:
The talk page concept is that a page is a record of a conversation (or often of several different conversations), You add a message to the conversation by editing the page to add the message. Then the other person (or people) interested read it and respond by editing in turn to add additional
814:
with the citation below in a notes or references section. But the important thing is not the precise formatting it is supplying the bibliographic information which would alow a reader to find the precise reference you are citing and to verify that it does support the text for which you cite
536:
I will look again at the draft article you wrote and posted. My memory is that it did NOT include any citations to sources at all, but i will confirm this. Note that every version of every article is preserved in the wikipedia history, for anyone to see at any time in the future if they so
432:, posted here to make it more likely that you will see them. Note that you apparently posted your comments without logging in, which means that they aren't actually confirmed as being yours. There are also comments from other users on my talk page on this subject. 356:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you.
453:-- that is, to published sources with reputations for accuracy and fact checking. (Books published by major publishers, mainstream magazines, and reputable newspapers are often reliable sources, blogs and press releases are generally not. See details at 467:
Above all you need to learn how to provide sources. The details of formatting citations can be left to others at this stage, but you need to provide the information on where a source can be found that supports statements made in an article.
591:. Either method is acceptable, but it is useful if a given article is consistent in such formatting. The second issue is how to link a citation to the statement in the articel which it supports. The most common method is with 555:
An internet link is very useful but by no means required -- many wikipedia articles are sourced to books or newspaper articles that are not available online and must be looked up in a library to verify them. Read the page on
487:
THANK YOU for emailing me. I'm not sure how the "talk" feature works, as it seems I'm "adding to a page?" as opposed to having a conversation with a person. It seems, however, that you are miraculously getting my
464:, which is the best way to communicate with me on wikipedia subjects. You do need to learn to sign your posts and preferably to indent them (done with leading colons), but those are comparatively minor matters. 309:
PR sort of thing. I am a PR professional, so I'm familiar with media events, but not the concept Alyson is discussing. However, I am generally in favor of consolidating multiple articles on similar topics.
439:
Please read the links in the "welcome" section above. It is generally considered unwise to post an email address on a wikipedia page, and most editors will remove it as soon as they see it.
587:
I will note further that the formatting of citations has two separate but related parts. The first issue is how to format the citation data itself. This can be done manually or by means of
576:
Do try using the talk page if you can -- many wikipedia editors will not respond by email and will ignore any request to do so and will not provide their own email addresses.
784:(Please note this is an entirely invented example). To make it into a footnote I would place this at the end of the text that it supports, wrapped in a ref tag, like this: 613:). But again, the details can safely be left to others at this stage, provided the basic information is there. I will return to this page and make further comments later. 502:
did not hyperlink or format them correctly. Is it just a matter of putting the right code in front and in back of each citation (like a hyperlink in an email?). -Alyson
442:
Please learn to sign your posts on talk pages such as this one with four tildes (like this: ~~~~). the wiki software will convert this into a signature and timestamp.
200:, a forum on Knowledge (XXG) for new editors to ask questions about editing Knowledge (XXG), and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! 186: 158: 284:
introduction events (speaking with my tech journalist hat on), I didn't see a need for two articles. One really solid article sounds like a great plan!
308:
To be fair Alyson posted elsewhere that a "Media Introduction Event" is something different, something more sponsored/paid for. Paid Marketing : -->
62: 395: 127: 457:) This is essential, and is the major problem in the draft you posted. Can you supply such published sources? They do not need to be online. 519:
messages. The advantage is that the conversation is available for anyone to read, and is preserved indefinitely, whereas email is neither.
262:(an article which desperately needs improvement). If you like, I would be happy to work with you on improving the Media Event article. 226:
Hi Alyson. Thanks for contributing to Knowledge (XXG) and I'm excited to see that you are a new user joining our ranks. I'm a member of
144: 352: 346: 26: 699:
case, Knowledge (XXG) citations must be to independently published reliable sources, and must be specific enough that a reader can
445:
To have the article you drafted on a "media introduction event" remain live in the article space, it will need to be supported by
347: 703:
them, possibly after going to some trouble. Some of the "citations" in your draft were to what might be outside sources, such as
353: 47: 294: 640:
It included many uses of the ref tag, which had a technical error in formatting. the ref tag is supposed to be used like this:
610: 588: 52: 56: 230:, which seeks to make a deliberate effort to (among other things) introduce and help new editors in a friendly way. 33: 22: 629: 273: 609:
template, but there are several other acceptable methods, including parenthetical or "Harvard" citations (see
69: 139: 337: 73: 212: 333: 227: 85: 888: 761: 166: 77: 197: 38: 842:
This sub-section is here to show how the example (fake) citation abovbe would display in an article.
818:
If you have further questions, please don't hesitate to ask them here or on my talk page or at the
290: 116: 109: 846: 826: 617: 472: 461: 429: 416: 406: 384: 377: 134: 96: 29:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: 258:
Hi Alyson. The media event page you created was deleted, because there is already an article on
84:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out 362: 208: 687: 556: 446: 806: 677: 603: 234: 162: 901: 774: 819: 695: 454: 450: 207:
I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have!
592: 286: 700: 843: 823: 614: 469: 460:
I hope this is helpful. You are "doing this right" as far as successfully posting on
413: 403: 311: 263: 245: 93: 358: 43: 436:
are confidential. (In fact I get an email notice for each edit to my talk page.)
344:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 185: 408:
02:06, 28 August 2012 (UTC) You might also want to look at the links in the new
277: 259: 636:
and with a few technicall formatting errors corrected, can be seen more fully
864: 737: 88:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place 848: 828: 619: 474: 418: 391: 366: 314: 299: 266: 248: 216: 170: 151: 123: 98: 157:
The above link is wrong. The messages were never there and are now at
791:
A Media Introduction event is a very important tool in ]<ref: -->
341: 81: 430:
User talk:DESiegel#Media Introduction Event and Public relations
336:
and Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion, you should
428:
This is a modified version of the response to your comments on
242:
Let me know if you need help and there's always the help desk.
398:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
376: 130:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
108: 690:
in the Knowledge (XXG) sense. Another wikipedia article is
663:
A Media Introduction event is a very important tool in ].
332:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
805:
A Media Introduction event is a very important tool in
676:
A Media Introduction event is a very important tool in
637: 633: 480:
I recieved the following note by email on this topic:
159:
Knowledge (XXG):Help desk/Archives/2012 August 9#refs
177:
Welcome to Knowledge (XXG): check out the Teahouse!
383:Hello, AlysonDutch. You have new messages at 115:Hello, AlysonDutch. You have new messages at 559:I linked to in my previous email for details. 402:Extensive response to your comments awaits. 8: 799:this would appear in the article like this: 705:The Fall of Advertising and the Rise of PR 68:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 869:Journal of Public Relations Professionals 742:Journal of Public Relations Professionals 713:Journal of Public Relations Professionals 648:Details of the citation here</ref: --> 628:I have now again reviewed your draft of 855: 897: 886: 770: 759: 707:. But they did not include the needed 92:before the question. Again, welcome! 670:and the text would appear as follows: 7: 729:which would appear in the article as 865:"An Anatomy of Media Introductions" 738:"An Anatomy of Media Introductions" 276:wasn't deleted, just redirected to 34:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 25:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for 14: 863:Jones, Jane; Smith, Fred (2011). 736:Jones, Jane; Smith, Fred (2011). 715:. I might format the citation as: 238:insert your citation</ref: --> 511:I responded to this as follows: 424:More on Media Introduction event 351: 345: 327: 184: 53:How to create your first article 280:. Given that most media events 233:After reverting your edits to 1: 875:(7). Megadyne Publishing: 69 748:(7). Megadyne Publishing: 69 409: 849:18:00, 29 August 2012 (UTC) 829:18:00, 29 August 2012 (UTC) 620:16:43, 29 August 2012 (UTC) 475:14:41, 29 August 2012 (UTC) 419:02:07, 28 August 2012 (UTC) 392:02:06, 28 August 2012 (UTC) 367:00:33, 28 August 2012 (UTC) 315:01:07, 28 August 2012 (UTC) 300:00:52, 28 August 2012 (UTC) 267:23:58, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 249:23:50, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 217:00:53, 10 August 2012 (UTC) 171:00:16, 28 August 2012 (UTC) 99:02:05, 28 August 2012 (UTC) 923: 239:at the end of a sentence. 152:05:29, 9 August 2012 (UTC) 124:05:29, 9 August 2012 (UTC) 63:Simplified Manual of Style 272:Just for clarity's sake: 196:, you are invited to the 86:Knowledge (XXG):Questions 630:Media Introduction Event 274:Media Introduction Event 21:Hello, AlysonDutch, and 48:How to develop articles 580: 563: 541: 523: 506: 492: 381: 141:A boat that can float! 113: 572: 550: 532: 514: 497: 483: 412:section above, also. 380: 117:Help Desk's talk page 112: 632:, which can be seen 385:DESiegel's talk page 896:Unknown parameter 769:Unknown parameter 686:But that is NOT a 589:Citation templates 396:remove this notice 382: 128:remove this notice 114: 44:How to edit a page 27:your contributions 851: 462:my user talk page 323:Your recent edits 205: 204: 148: 147:(watch me float!) 76:your messages on 914: 906: 905: 899: 894: 892: 884: 882: 880: 860: 841: 807:public relations 793: 778: 772: 767: 765: 757: 755: 753: 723: 678:public relations 664: 649: 608: 602: 451:reliable sources 399: 355: 349: 331: 330: 298: 235:public relations 188: 181: 180: 149: 146: 142: 137: 131: 91: 922: 921: 917: 916: 915: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 895: 885: 878: 876: 862: 861: 857: 839: 790: 768: 758: 751: 749: 735: 721: 696:reliable source 662: 646: 606: 600: 449:to independent 426: 400: 389: 374: 340:by typing four 338:sign your posts 328: 325: 285: 256: 224: 219: 201: 179: 145: 140: 135: 132: 121: 106: 89: 19: 12: 11: 5: 920: 918: 908: 907: 854: 853: 838: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 816: 803: 802: 801: 800: 788: 787: 786: 785: 733: 732: 731: 730: 719: 718: 717: 716: 674: 673: 672: 671: 660: 659: 658: 657: 644: 643: 642: 641: 623: 622: 584: 583: 582: 581: 567: 566: 565: 564: 557:citing sources 545: 544: 543: 542: 527: 526: 525: 524: 508: 507: 494: 493: 481: 425: 422: 390:Message added 388: 375: 373: 370: 324: 321: 320: 319: 318: 317: 303: 302: 255: 252: 223: 220: 206: 203: 202: 191: 189: 178: 175: 174: 173: 122:Message added 120: 107: 105: 102: 66: 65: 60: 57:Article Wizard 50: 41: 36: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 919: 903: 890: 874: 870: 866: 859: 856: 852: 850: 847: 845: 836: 830: 827: 825: 821: 817: 813: 812: 811: 810: 809: 808: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 783: 782: 781: 780: 779: 776: 763: 747: 743: 739: 728: 727: 726: 725: 724: 714: 710: 706: 702: 697: 694:considered a 693: 689: 685: 684: 683: 682: 681: 679: 669: 668: 667: 666: 665: 654: 653: 652: 651: 650: 639: 635: 631: 627: 626: 625: 624: 621: 618: 616: 612: 605: 598: 594: 590: 586: 585: 579: 577: 571: 570: 569: 568: 562: 560: 558: 549: 548: 547: 546: 540: 538: 531: 530: 529: 528: 522: 520: 513: 512: 510: 509: 505: 503: 496: 495: 491: 489: 482: 479: 478: 477: 476: 473: 471: 465: 463: 458: 456: 452: 448: 443: 440: 437: 433: 431: 423: 421: 420: 417: 415: 411: 407: 405: 397: 393: 386: 379: 371: 369: 368: 364: 360: 354: 348: 343: 339: 335: 322: 316: 313: 312:User:King4057 307: 306: 305: 304: 301: 296: 292: 288: 283: 279: 275: 271: 270: 269: 268: 265: 264:User:King4057 261: 253: 251: 250: 247: 246:User:King4057 243: 240: 236: 231: 229: 221: 218: 214: 210: 199: 195: 190: 187: 183: 182: 176: 172: 168: 164: 160: 156: 155: 154: 153: 150: 143: 138: 129: 125: 118: 111: 103: 101: 100: 97: 95: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 64: 61: 58: 54: 51: 49: 45: 42: 40: 37: 35: 32: 31: 30: 28: 24: 16: 889:cite journal 877:. Retrieved 872: 868: 858: 840: 804: 789: 762:cite journal 750:. Retrieved 745: 741: 734: 720: 712: 708: 704: 691: 675: 661: 647:<ref: --> 645: 611:this section 599:tag and the 597:<ref: --> 596: 575: 573: 553: 551: 535: 533: 517: 515: 500: 498: 486: 484: 466: 459: 444: 441: 438: 434: 427: 401: 326: 281: 257: 244: 241: 232: 228:WP:RETENTION 225: 209:SarahStierch 193: 133: 67: 59:if you wish) 20: 278:Media event 260:Media Event 254:Media Event 194:AlysonDutch 163:PrimeHunter 90:{{help me}} 80:using four 55:(using the 595:using the 394:. You can 334:talk pages 126:. You can 78:talk pages 70:Wikipedian 900:ignored ( 879:29 August 820:help desk 773:ignored ( 752:29 August 709:specifics 593:Footnotes 447:citations 72:! Please 688:citation 410:#Welcome 372:Talkback 295:Contribs 198:Teahouse 104:Talkback 39:Tutorial 17:Welcome! 898:|month= 771:|month= 604:reflist 537:choose. 359:SineBot 222:Sources 192:Hello! 23:welcome 701:verify 488:notes. 342:tildes 82:tildes 837:Notes 692:never 455:WP:RS 136:FloBo 902:help 881:2012 775:help 754:2012 638:here 634:here 363:talk 291:Talk 287:Dori 213:talk 167:talk 74:sign 46:and 844:DES 824:DES 815:it. 615:DES 470:DES 414:DES 404:DES 350:or 282:are 94:DES 893:: 891:}} 887:{{ 873:28 871:. 867:. 822:. 766:: 764:}} 760:{{ 746:28 744:. 740:. 680:. 607:}} 601:{{ 365:) 357:-- 293:☯ 215:) 169:) 161:. 904:) 883:. 777:) 756:. 578:" 574:" 561:" 552:" 539:" 534:" 521:" 516:" 504:" 499:" 490:" 485:" 387:. 361:( 297:☽ 289:☾ 211:( 165:( 119:.

Index

welcome
your contributions
The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
Tutorial
How to edit a page
How to develop articles
How to create your first article
Article Wizard
Simplified Manual of Style
Wikipedian
sign
talk pages
tildes
Knowledge (XXG):Questions
DES

02:05, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Help Desk's talk page
05:29, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
remove this notice
FloBo
A boat that can float!
(watch me float!)
05:29, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Knowledge (XXG):Help desk/Archives/2012 August 9#refs
PrimeHunter
talk
00:16, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Teahouse logo

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.