62:
I suspect your username of "GrotesqueOldParty" is probably inherently provocative to some; I can only guess at what some might think they can intuit from my own "an unattributed source" ID. I took down a lot of personally identifying information (like an autographed photo of me standing one-on-one with
Senator John Kerry, which is of course still visible to anyone browsing the log of all of my contributions) after I felt I had been at least "menaced" by username "Crockspot" - look at
49:
may try to avoid them showing up in our "work," that's not always possible. The consensus approach to building
Knowledge (XXG) helps avoid this bias "settling in," as it were. Am I wrong about that? It doesn't seem like responding to such comments with bullying and threats is very constructive at all.
78:
I "menaced" you? Bullshit. You happened to be editing quite a few articles that are on my watchlist, and you were slipping in content that is not allowed. I stopped and corrected you. If you think that's "menacing", then I'd love to see what you called it if I was really menacing you. Now stop making
61:
I agree. It is difficult for me to understand the underlying causes of AuburnPilot's expressed belligerence, at least as I read and interpret his comments directed at me personally, as well as those he directed at you. I have looked at his own contrib and talk pages, and have clues, but only clues.
48:
I don't understand this. Suggesting that censorship may be ideologically based is NOT a personal attack, but a comment on what content a user seems to attack and what he or she seems to let go. The point, I think, is that we all have our personal biases - every last single one of us - and while we
21:
I've responding to your comment on Talk:Dick Cheney regarding the external links, but I wanted to be sure you see my response to your accusations of "ideologically based censorship". I find that to be an egregious attack and expect it to never happen again. It is extremely inappropriate and
26:
policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Also, when leaving a comment, please sign using four tildes ~~~~. This will produce your name and date. -
101:
119:
95:
67:
113:
91:
50:
131:
35:
109:
79:
personal attacks on me, or you'll find yourself the subject of a behavioral RfC (to start). -
105:
123:
27:
23:
136:
83:
70:
53:
40:
80:
104:) has been blocked indefinitely as a block evading
66:talk pages if you really want to lose some sleep.
8:
90:Just thought you'd like to know that
7:
122:), who was blocked for trolling. -
14:
1:
22:explicitly forbidden by our
153:
137:16:24, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
84:16:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
71:15:52, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
54:02:55, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
41:20:23, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
68:An unattributed source
24:no personal attack
134:
92:GrotesqueOldParty
51:GrotesqueOldParty
38:
144:
132:
129:
126:
36:
33:
30:
17:Talk:Dick Cheney
152:
151:
147:
146:
145:
143:
142:
141:
127:
124:
31:
28:
19:
12:
11:
5:
150:
148:
140:
139:
110:TortureIsWrong
88:
87:
86:
59:
58:
57:
56:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
149:
138:
135:
130:
121:
118:
115:
111:
107:
103:
100:
97:
93:
89:
85:
82:
77:
76:
75:
74:
73:
72:
69:
65:
55:
52:
47:
46:
45:
44:
43:
42:
39:
34:
25:
16:
116:
98:
63:
60:
20:
106:sockpuppet
81:Crockspot
120:contribs
102:contribs
125:auburn
29:auburn
128:pilot
32:pilot
133:talk
114:talk
96:talk
37:talk
108:of
64:his
117:·
112:(
99:·
94:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.