Knowledge

User talk:AnnaleeNewitz

Source đź“ť

152:. It's too bad that you were caught up in this long term confusion so soon after joining Knowledge. Please don't be discouraged by this. I have written a variety of biography article and gravitate towards writing about obscure people, technologies, ideas, and events. If you have any questions, are in need of assistance, or would like to receive a friendly comment or two, please feel free to post on 170:." Articles of this sort (and the Austin Grossman article you carefully recreated was in a similar condition when it came to asserting the importance of the topic) are routinely deleted/redirected, which is why we need users like you who are willing to take the time to properly create them and make sure topics like these are accurately covered. 180:
I loved your article. You would not believe the things I've gone through here. So many people have been sanctioned for such small things. If you think the way wikipedians treat articles is bad, the way they treat people who fall out of favor with some administrators is much worse. If you want
198:
is conflating "notability" & "verifiability." I'm pretty much sick of both of them & left with the idea of doing original research elsewhere—which research I never really did, unfortunately. I would love this site to spawn some kind of "WikiResearch." Or perhaps I wouldn't.
144:". Confusing? Yes! Many people on Knowledge operate with the idea that "Knowledge notability" means importance. And why shouldn't they. The common use of the term notability means importance. However, many others use it to mean "significant coverage in 136:
article. Unlike just about everywhere else where the term "notability" is used, Knowledge written guidelines do not use notability in the sense of importance.
133: 17: 185:
by an old-timer who has seen some treasured capabilities here disintegrated by "process." You will especially like the section on submitting new articles.
24:, I encourage you to find some published sources about her; this will be the only way to ensure it does not get deleted, as everything in Knowledge must be 51:
to Knowledge! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
182: 101: 166:
As an aside to this, I think it is pertinent to look at the version of Sonia Greene that was actually redirected to Lovecraft: "
94:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
75: 60: 145: 141: 80: 55: 48: 87: 149: 91: 95: 168:
In 1918, Sonia Haft Greene was an energetic and ambitious Jewish émigré with literary ambitions...
204: 153: 119: 70: 115: 200: 195: 157: 65: 33: 171: 29: 21: 137: 25: 186: 208: 189: 174: 160: 122: 36: 181:
some great source material to share with your readers, I strongly suggest
118:. Maybe you can get yourself deleted for lack of notability. -- 98:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place 41:
Here some basic welcome boilerplate you may find useful:
106:
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
167: 140:uses notability to mean "significant coverage in 132:Hi Annalee and welcome to Knowledge. I read your 8: 86:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 150:Knowledge general notability guideline 183:User:Kim Bruning/Lost functionalities 7: 194:I also love your article. I think 14: 128:Your Knowledge activism article 1: 56:The five pillars of Knowledge 76:How to write a great article 224: 47:Hello, AnnaleeNewitz, and 209:22:56, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 190:17:37, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 175:11:03, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 161:23:35, 6 June 2007 (UTC) 123:16:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC) 37:01:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC) 138:Knowledge Notability 18:this piece you wrote 16:Welcome! I noticed 96:Knowledge:Questions 134:Knowledge activism 61:How to edit a page 215: 146:reliable sources 142:reliable sources 105: 30:reliable sources 223: 222: 218: 217: 216: 214: 213: 212: 148:" as stated at 130: 112: 99: 81:Manual of Style 12: 11: 5: 221: 219: 178: 177: 129: 126: 116:Annalee Newitz 111: 108: 92:sign your name 84: 83: 78: 73: 68: 63: 58: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 220: 211: 210: 206: 202: 197: 192: 191: 188: 184: 176: 173: 169: 165: 164: 163: 162: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 127: 125: 124: 121: 120:The Cunctator 117: 109: 107: 103: 97: 93: 89: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 67: 64: 62: 59: 57: 54: 53: 52: 50: 45: 44: 39: 38: 35: 31: 27: 23: 19: 193: 179: 154:my talk page 131: 113: 110:on wikipedia 85: 46: 42: 40: 22:Sonia Greene 15: 88:Wikipedian 66:Help pages 26:verifiable 114:See also 90:! Please 28:based on 201:Ventifax 196:Jreferee 158:Jreferee 71:Tutorial 43:Welcome! 34:ragesoss 172:Circeus 49:welcome 20:. For 102:helpme 187:BenB4 156:. -- 205:talk 32:.-- 207:) 104:}} 100:{{ 203:(

Index

this piece you wrote
Sonia Greene
verifiable
reliable sources
ragesoss
01:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
welcome
The five pillars of Knowledge
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Wikipedian
sign your name
Knowledge:Questions
helpme
Annalee Newitz
The Cunctator
16:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Knowledge activism
Knowledge Notability
reliable sources
reliable sources
Knowledge general notability guideline
my talk page
Jreferee
23:35, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
In 1918, Sonia Haft Greene was an energetic and ambitious Jewish émigré with literary ambitions...
Circeus

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑