User talk:Anesleyp - Knowledge (XXG)

3807:

53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --

3361: 2191:

did not remove any of the dead links and you added back loads of content that does not need to be there. The article does not need two different sections about the co-host Chuy Bravo. The article also does not need a detailed account of what the official website has to offer. Not that it matters but I watch the show regularly which means I know original research when I see it. As I stated previously, I've looked at the history of the article and it's apparent that any time anyone makes any changes, you or the IP revert. Whether you like it or not, other people are allowed to edit and change this article. If you don't like it, I suggest you don't edit Knowledge (XXG).

953:). He hasn't done but maybe one edit on that current history list. If he/she has and it's was so long ago that it's on the next page of the edit history log... well you should have notified them earlier. But if in fact I am wrong, and you have (BUT IT WAS SO FAR BACK THE HISTORY LOG DOES'NT CONTAIN IT ON THE FIRST PAGE); just remember that you're not supposed to revert an article 3 times within 24 hours. If you disagree with the content, you're supposed to place the appropriate tag and then discuss it on the talk page. 3890:. There's a new bonus prize of $ 200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale! 161: 3496: 3452: 3239: 3001: 2803: 2484: 2387: 3832: 2599: 1237: 3903: 2174:

absolutely no reason. If you and that IP user don't start explaining your edits, I will request that the page be locked. A cursory glance at the history of the article shows that you both revert whomever edits the article for no reason no matter what kind of changes are made. That is unacceptable behavior. If you have an issue, take it to the talk page as I suggested in my last edit summary.

1513:

on the sites. so please let me know on how i can send that proof to you because i dont want to be considered as a false claimer. that message scared me in a way i didnt know what to do as a matter of fact im confused on why wikipedia believes the claims are false. like i stated previously i have no problem showing more proof. thank you for your time. -byron mcneish (akon's sound engineer)

2735: 2106: 2038: 1970: 1881: 1425: 2294: 2975: 1588: 486: 3575: 3542: 3711: 3421: 2331: 3187: 3103: 1743: 265: 1676: 1647: 590: 545: 2930:. Just to let you know i have reverted your edit. I did this because the image you changed it to is an image i uploaded, im waiting for wiki to confirm my licensing on the the image, so until its confirmed, its not allowed to be used in an article to comply with copyrighting laws. If you have any questions leave me a message on my 1359:

page. What does that mean...? Hmm let's think.... TO TALK! And just because I provide a useful link to help you check to see if they are an admin doesn't mean I'm calling you stupid. And in the future please refrain from using such language in your messages. We're trying to be polite not rude here on WP.

1512:

i went on wikipedia to do some research and i received a message stating that the posts i posted were false claims .. althougn they are not. although i may not be the actual person who i wrote about or added information upon (which are the rules i followed) i do work in the company. theres also proof

3806:

which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the

1539:

Because Chelsea Lately is a talk show and not a show with a story and plot like Glee or The Office, a list of episodes is not needed and unpractical. Plus, even if you only list the guest for each episode, older episodes didn't always have guests and the information would be borderline impossible to

920:

is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on

801:

It is a standard practice for talk messages to be grouped together. What I mean by this is... If a message was left on your user talk page, reply there. If you left a message on my talk page, I will reply there. It keeps things organized. But I started this message here, so let's keep it here; for I

780:

Avoid using edit summaries to carry on debates or negotiation over the content or to express opinions of the other users involved. This creates an atmosphere where the only way to carry on discussion is to revert other editors! If you notice this happening, start a section on the talk page and place

1897:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if

888:

Two things: First, your reason of "im right" is not enough to go undoing a user's edits. Unfortunately, you do not work for Michael Bay, and because of this you are not privvy to such information such as the existence, or lack of, a fourth movie in the series. Secondly, your warning of a user for

434:

I do consider myself retired, but I am making gnomeish edits and keeping an eye on the articles I have made or updated on my watchlist. I haven't though done any updating since going into retirement. I know that isn't the definition of retirement, but I don't have anyone to take over watching the

2190:

I specifically asked you to take your concerns to the talk page instead of edit warring and instead, you blindly revert. There were other constructive changes made to the article that you did not have to revert. Is there a reason you felt that all the changes I made don't belong? Additionally, you

785:

If you do have an editing conflict, do so on the article's talk page. And, if you so choose, notify the User, whom you are in conflict with, that you are discussing the matter on the article's talk page. But don't use the edit summary box as a way to discuss something between two users. THAT'S WHY

1358:

Nobody cares HOW many edits you have. Quantity doesn't matter, it's quality. And I'm not nagging you per se. I'm trying to help you out. That is anther wiki thing we do here; we help each other out. Whether informally or formally, we do. And it doesn't matter how much space I take up. It's a talk

2685:

article is very close to earning you a block. It would be good if you answer the 3RR complaint (at the above link) and promise to stop warring on this article. If you will agree to abide by consensus, the complaint might be closed without further action. If a block is issued, it might be for two

844:

Also. I was very tired while typing this, so I have made mistakes. Just a little tip for in the future: instead of taking someone's work by copying it without permission or asking them how they did some cool editing thing to add to your page, try using wikipedia's search. It is how you will find

2173:

Is there a particular reason you are mass reverting the changes I made to this article? I explained my changes on the talk page and even provided details as to what I removed and why. You are adding back poorly written, repeated and misspelled content (not to mention a number a dead links) for

707:

for information about properly reusing text created by others, and refrain from copying others' content without proper attribution. As Vossanova said above, you should come up with your own content to describe yourself; it is difficult to interpret this as anything other than deliberate

1200:. What matters most is that you are falsely advertising your number of edits. The one userbox that says +131 (think that's what it says) is correct because obviously 184 is more than 131, but 184 ≠ 7000+. Sorry, but if you think 184 = 7000+ then you need to go back to kindergarten math. 222:

I have condensed and structured the article logically and according to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies. I have included all of the relevant information you have provided. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, the majority of your additions to

1382:. Please engage the other editor on the article's talk page and work out your differences. I have temporarily protected the page until you two can establish a consensus version. Let me know when you've concluded your discussion and I will re-open the article. Thanks. 703:. It appears that you selectively copied barnstars and personal, descriptive text from no less than five distinct users to create your userpage. This is a violation of those users' copyrights. I will be removing the improperly copied portions of your userpage. Please see 2137:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 2069:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 2001:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 1456:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 2262:

Anesley, could I trouble you to join the discussion on the article's talk page before making any other reversions? As much as I appreciate your enthusiasm about filling out the article, valid concerns about the sourcing of the material have been raised. Thanks.

321:

The videos weren't taken off the internet, though. They are still available. Besides, half of the stuff you keep adding back is unsourced, so it must be removed by wikipedia policy. And doing a photo shoot for a new season is pretty irrelevant to the article.

3858:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

2708:

article has been protected from editing for one week due to the edit war. Please use the talk page to persuade other editors to support your changes, instead of taking action unilaterally. If you do not abide by consensus, you may be blocked.

1549:

I don't do canvassing and since it's a daily talk show, we don't need an article listing every episode of the series, so I would not support it (and have asked for deletion on "List of talk show episodes" articles in the past). Sorry.

2616:

prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the

659:

image from your userpage as fairuse images should not be used in userspace. I have been called on the carpet for that one before. Please only use images you have created in userspace. If you have any questions, message me. -

3513:

If you can't come, but still want to find out about events in the greater Topeka region (which may include KC, Manhattan, Lawrence, Salina, or other places where volunteers are interested) sign up for future notifications at

1268:, he/she in fact does know how to sign messages. But I mean come on!!! You're wasting good edits. No need to be nagging on UKER because her didn't sign a message... BIG WHOOP! There is something that looks exactly like this: 889:

reverting your baseless information is also out of line, and abuses rules of Knowledge (XXG), Keeping a Cool Head, and Discussing the issue in the talk page rather than the edit summaries. Please stop reverting the edit.

1196:... I believe it says 184 total. So where are the other 6816 contributions? Hmm... and 75 of those (approx. 41%) are "contributions" to your OWN userpage (excluding the 5 that are still in your namespace). But quantity 809:

I'm glad you actually asked me how to do something from my pages, rather than just take it like you have in the past; something I've asked another admin about. This admin may or may not do anything about it; it's up to

1827: 3862:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

3671:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 3616:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 468:". The "speculation" section is just that - unfounded rumors. Anything with "possibly" in it should not even be considered for the page, otherwise you are just writing in what you think the truth should be. -- 3348:, and Exhibit Specialist, Dee Harris; and time in the research room to work on projects. The focus of the projects will be scanning, writing articles, transcribing, or categorizing images on Commons. 772:. Conflicts between two users, even when pertaining to edit conflicts, should not be discussed in the edit summaries. If you do have an editing conflict, do so on the articles talk page. It even states 2133:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2065:

1997:

1452:

1710:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our

968:

What? I don't know about you, but I see four edits by Anesleyp in the first page dated October 12, 11, 8 and 3. It's nowhere near violating the 3RR either, but it's not like he hasn't been there. --

624:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our

3148:

Please dont add "Boy Like You" to Kesha discography again. Your link is a fansite that does not give writing credit for the song. It only says the song is "Boy Like You". Doesnt mention Kesha -

3750:

for more information, including parking info, food options, and available activities. If you plan on attending, please add your name to the attendees list. We look forward to seeing you!

306:

Please stop readding the information to the article's introduction. It is mostly fluff that doesn't belong in the lead, and some of it is unsourced or doesn't support what is being said.

3277:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 3887: 3880: 3506:(WALRUS) and hosted by the Topeka and Shawnee Public Library. Come chat, hang out and enjoy good company while find out more about Knowledge (XXG) in our regional community! RSVP at 3462:(WALRUS) and hosted by the Topeka and Shawnee Public Library. Come chat, hang out and enjoy good company while find out more about Knowledge (XXG) in our regional community! RSVP at 3802: 2664: 1260:"Do you know how to leave your signature.If not you are not a proper wikipedian.I suggest you should refer to more wikipedia pages other than Transformers revenge of the fallen." 1173:

You have the userbox {{User wikipedia/rollback}} on your page. Well guess what... you haven't been granted roll back rights. If you did (on the list) your name would appear like

832:

3. Create another page. User:Anesleyp/Status. On this page, place: {{User:Tm93/StatusTemplate|out}}. This is where you change your status. You can change it to in, busy, or out.

3273:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1821: 2311: 1248:

from editing. The article cites a source for Transformers being a trilogy, so unless you have a source that says otherwise, the third movie is the final one in the trilogy.

2770:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

3925:

during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

2206:

Any further communication about the article should be made via the article's talk page. I'm opening an RfC because I'm not going to edit war with you over this nonsense.

1901:

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

3914: 3266: