648:
course, after his death, Macedonians practically occupied the entire Greece and diadochi were as such āGreek kingsā also. No secondary biography of
Alexander ever stated something like āthe Macedonians and the OTHER Greeksā. Yes, there are some ambiguous places but it appears that the connotations are to the king (who claimed his Hellenic ancestors). As I specified in the discussion in an answer to one other editor, we can not and should not use sometimes subjective, ethnic or cultural connotation but we have to follow political history. Applied to the Ancient Greece - as it is customary to say when we talk about Southern Balkan in the ancient times, the political situation we are concerned with here had for the main political subjects Macedonian kingdom and the Hellenes, i.e., Hellenic city-states. The term āAncient Greeceā is a technical term meant for the history books only, and does not imply that what is given in a particular book following that heading that this belongs inevitably to Greece as we see it today. I think now that this is the cause of the disputes on these pages.
772:
or 4 similar professionals or patriots. That āgangā is replacing āMacedoniaā with āGreeceā all over the places. I can not grasp why and how these are profiting from this: FYROM may be by reserving for that state the name of āMacedoniaā, or Greece, may be is attracted by a kind of pan-Hellenism? Anyway, in the meantime, history pages on
Knowledge (XXG) suffer enormously from bias. Last year my password was even broken, I complained (see may Talk page), no ADMINISTRATOR intervened and I stopped being interested for editing for more then a year. I suspect then that even the "administrator" is in the gang. I just started again last month, and you and your collaborators (my hypothesis only) are reacting. I find it very patriotic and quite normal. But damaging for Knowledge (XXG). I will have to abandon Knowledge (XXG) for some time again if nobody would stop this gang in their destructive activity.
526:
articles on Alex. I or the Argead dynasty are places where something like the proposed change would be more appropriate; on
Macedon or Macedonians, lengthier expositions are preferred, as per your last point. In any case, I do not intend to contest such edits if there has been a discussion on the talk page (even if I am not sure I have the will to participate again very actively), since I have been convinced now that this is not an extremely important part of the article; that being said, we can't just change it lightly, especially if a few editors don't agree. I hope this clarifies my objection. Cheers
511:
thought
Macedonians were barbarians. My version does not dispute any claim he is Greek, but doesn't fail to mention that Greeks could consider Macedonians not-Greek. And no, this doesn't imply Macedonians weren't Greek or there aren't many scholars supporting Alexander was Greek. It's neutral conserning this, but it neither makes bold statements that conceal the struggle about ethnicity that is reported. If you have I better idea for phrasing this difficult issue I'm all ears.
981:
20:
231:
26:
792:
someone will look at the case independently. Otherwise, however, it is not acceptable to use an undisclosed "sockpuppet" to advance your opinion in edit disputes, and no need to reply with accusations if you think I am mistaken; I just noted the striking conicidences of the two accounts' contributions. Regards.
837:
trolls
Knowledge (XXG) in a crusade against us, stating his usual lies and POVS, although his utterly aggressive style and conspiracy theories have only attracted scorn. I don't really worry about this but I confess I am a bit wary as to how he can disrupt future discussions. See what should be done, thx
407:
if you want, just an essay with general info). Due to my time zone I cannot look into real detail until tomorrow, but I can briefly say that I agree that this part was not exceptional content and was poorly written, but it was sourced; so probably it could be better rephrased so that something about
791:
page. For example, do you deny using the alternative account or do you claim a legitimate reason? The talk-page tags you see are automated and only indicate that there is a suspicion of using a sockpuppet, no proof of anything yet. If I am wrong there is no reason to worry, these will be removed and
771:
YOUR ACCUSATIONS on my Talk page: Why you have such "impression"? I think because you are just fulfilling your patriotic duties. I suspect, please excuse me if I am wrong, that you are either employed by FYROM (what is less likely) or by Greece (what is more likely) and acting in concordance with 3
743:
Fine, this is kind of Royal decision. Interestingly, Alexander would in a similar circumstances give grounds for his decision to his generals... And this sounds also just fine. At least number of GoogWicks will applaud. O.K. Do these changes please. Even "Geek Argead dynasty" would be O.K. (with or
480:
Hi
Wandalstouring, and thanks for the message. I think you indeed improved the grammar, but I have been working on this article for a long time, and I can assure you that the "original" version is the one I restored. No harm in discussing any change on the talk page and getting some other opinions
355:
This source is not just a link to an author and historians' website. It leads to a 1 hour podcast discussion, aired in the UK, with two other boni fide historians. I think it is at least at importance as some of the other links, such as art exhibits, etc., therefore I must respectfully disagree.
647:
3. Stating that he was a āGreek kingā does not make much sense since Fillip II was also a king of
Macedon and he was having a war against Greeks. His son could not all of a sudden be a Greek king. He was never accepted as a Greek king though. He was more a head of the alliance against Persians. Of
510:
Than we disagree on that issue. And it's not my first edit in this field. I put that
Alexander's family claims Greek origin, this is based ultimately about Herodot's history of the Olympic competition where his ancestor Alexander ran. The Greeks according to this story were astonished because they
559:
Dear
Antipastor. Thanks for taking part in the discussion. I think I have to explain also to you some aspects of the changes that I desire. If you followed the discussion it will be easy. Otherwise, you may need more explanation. But let me try, please. I want to say that the right word to use is
836:
for their modus operandi and phraseology used. As I see it, in the first investigation, the sock account was banned, Draganparis was not (his ban was about disruptive editing) and the case now is closed. I sincerely think that it should reopen with new evidence of yet more sock accounts. He also
525:
Ah thanks for replying, I meant the edit and talk histories where this has been debated innumerable times. I don't have a better idea for the wording, but I have no objection with the previous/current one. I think that this is unambiguous about Alex III individually for many reasons; I think the
205:
That's okay, but I fail to see how the page was vandalism while it was in main space. Don't forget not to bite newbies, in this case I think that moving to userspace and explaining the user's error is the correct thing to do, a lot of newbs take a lot of offence at having their good faith edits
669:
However, Alexander wanted very much to bring his
Macedonians into the great nation of the Hellenes. And he, as I think, succeeded in this in the end, but not only through the wars; the process was long and more through the language at first, and then through education, science and culture.
871:
At first, I wanted to add the word "amateur" to describe the author of the article in question, but when I saw this I was in doubt. You are right of course, but I think it is still useful as a reference, since the recent forgery discussions originate from it.
495:
I see you already reverted... please check the history and self-revert if you want when you verify what I am saying... anyway I do not want to engage in a lengthy debate, or a revert-war but I think such a change really needs more discussion.
371:
I learned something about providing links yesterday from you. Thank you for that and mostly the way that you explained it. Your reasons were sound. I do try to read Wiki rules, etc., by there is a vast amount to learn. Thanks for the help.
1031:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
897:
is being reviewed for Good Article listing. It has been put on hold for an initial 14 days to allow for minor issues related to coverage and authorial tone to be addressed. Any assistance would be welcomed.
402:
Hi again Mugginsx, indeed this seems quite a bold edit, so congratulations on that! You won't be verbally hammered, but there could be disagreement, so be ready to discuss the edit in this case (check out
921:
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
440:
That hadn't occurred to me either, a nice coincidence! Regarding the other edit, a rewording is not extremely easy after all, but I might give it a try too some time (if I think of a way to improve it).
55:
at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
32:
39:
and have been editing Knowledge (XXG) for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Knowledge (XXG)! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on
993:
Thank you for your note of encouragement in my early days. (see 11 January 2010 (UTC) I still read it if I get discouraged and remember there are kind editors like you.
942:
937:
in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.
465:
Dear antipastor read the edit history before you start making claims. I restored the ORIGINAL version that was agreed upon and that does not make dubious claims.
705:
I don't support the statements by Draganparis. I will add that he was a member of the Argead dynasty because that's a rather longlived institution for Greece.
207:
210:
which obviously doesn't have a good enough edit conflict catcher. Anyhow, thanks for removing the speedy, and keep up your npp, the more eyes we have at
99:
387:
Well, I was Wiki-Bold and took out one of the segment I thought was irrelevent and conjecture. I hope I don't get verbally hammered! Wish me luck!
102:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out
560:"Hellenes" (į¼Ī»Ī»Ī·Ī½ĪµĻ). The Greeks would be also happy about it, because they are calling themselves today "ellenika" (ĪµĪ»Ī»Ī·Ī½Ī¹ĪŗĪ¬), what is the same.
605:
2. and that his dynasty and he claimed Hellenic origins (which is disputed, as somebody else mentioned and I think we can put it in the text).
426:
I will take your advice. I did not think you were in the same time zone. There cannot be that many insominacs such as myself. Thanks again.
1056:
856:
I'm not sure if you realise that this is a magazine aimed at the upper end of the antiques/arts magazine, and not a scholarly journal.
272:
Hi, I have removed the prod template in favor of the AfD debate. I agree that we should remove this article once and for all. Regards,
946:
involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by
925:
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (
79:
1052:
69:
744:
without stating doubts about this which Hammond and particularly Borza expressed). But to state just "Geek king" is false.
131:
888:
152:
Thanks for all you've done to combat vandalism in your brief stint as Knowledge (XXG) editor. You may want to check out
1043:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
84:
1048:
266:
64:
59:
710:
516:
470:
91:
788:
1044:
103:
95:
777:
749:
696:
206:
labelled as vandalism. Sorry I left you a note which makes it sound like I removed the speedy, I use a
773:
745:
692:
926:
861:
1020:
1011:
962:
894:
706:
512:
466:
311:
239:
219:
195:
183:
172:
1040:
1024:
929:). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was
292:
998:
908:
431:
392:
377:
361:
323:
161:
947:
156:
for more information on vandalism and tools to revert it more quickly and efficiently. Cheers,
296:
256:
138:
107:
40:
1036:
1028:
812:
I think that our dear friend Draganparis has put into play some more sock accounts. See here
153:
842:
211:
1039:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1032:
404:
179:
873:
857:
819:
793:
527:
497:
482:
442:
413:
336:
114:
48:
980:
816:
813:
958:
954:
277:
235:
215:
191:
19:
994:
901:
584:
1. Alexander the Great was a king of Macedon (and not Greek king as it is stated now)
427:
388:
373:
357:
315:
157:
74:
252:
182:. I just wanted to inform you that I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on
123:
36:
838:
409:
933:. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to
273:
230:
953:
Thank you for your understanding and happy editingĀ :) Editing on behalf of
1060:
1002:
966:
911:
881:
865:
846:
801:
781:
753:
714:
700:
535:
520:
505:
490:
474:
450:
435:
421:
412:
is kept, but eliminating the confusion and anything irrelevant. Cheers!
396:
381:
365:
356:
Why do you not at least listen to the podcast before making an opinion?
344:
329:
300:
281:
260:
243:
223:
199:
165:
142:
1027:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
917:
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
190:
If you have any questions or other message, please contact me. Thanks
25:
691:
I think that we may have a concensus now. Thanks very much again.
787:
Hi Draganparis. If you want only, you can state your defense on
291:
Thanks for your so speedy clean-up of my article on Rita Atria.
120:
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
950:). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
310:
Hi Antipastor. Could enable emailing on your account, at
408:
the historians' speculation about his relationship with
834:
831:
828:
825:
822:
581:
And the right formulation of the first sentence is that
481:
and a consensus before making such a change. Regards.
178:Hi Antipastor! Firstly, thanks for helping out in
1019:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
940:For established users such as yourself there is
821:for the history of the accounts as well as here
228:Also, thanks for making amends with the userĀ :)
188:the page is not blatantly vandalism or a hoax.
94:! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on
8:
314:? I wish to contact you via email. Thanks,
251:My mistake on Macedonian language. Sorry!
90:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
18:
148:Thanks for your vandal-fighting efforts
7:
987:The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
335:Hi Jamie, OK, I confirmed my email.
351:Alexander the Great- Source section
65:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
14:
1045:review the candidates' statements
979:
229:
24:
1051:. For the Election committee,
1021:Arbitration Committee election
1012:ArbCom elections are now open!
244:17:14, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
224:16:43, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
200:16:35, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
166:02:28, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
143:15:10, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
1:
1061:14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
912:23:47, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
171:Removed speedy deletion tag:
23:Some cookies to welcome you!
889:Talk:Alexander the Great/GA1
802:15:56, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
782:11:18, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
754:08:45, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
715:20:35, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
701:17:47, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
536:15:40, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
521:15:01, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
506:13:28, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
491:13:24, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
475:13:22, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
451:13:18, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
436:17:16, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
422:16:32, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
397:16:01, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
382:08:53, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
366:11:40, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
345:04:06, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
330:03:56, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
301:07:13, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
282:12:31, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
80:How to write a great article
1047:and submit your choices on
808:New puppets of Draganparis?
267:Khaled El-Khweldi El-Hamedi
261:13:21, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
214:the better IMOĀ :). Best, -
1076:
1053:MediaWiki message delivery
967:19:27, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
847:22:45, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
33:Welcome to Knowledge (XXG)
1003:14:20, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
978:
882:19:04, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
866:18:59, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
104:Knowledge (XXG):Questions
877:
797:
531:
501:
486:
446:
417:
340:
943:a workaround available
29:
1025:Arbitration Committee
22:
927:consensus discussion
1029:arbitration process
972:A barnstar for you!
895:Alexander the Great
461:Alexander the Great
312:Special:Preferences
184:User:Chitresh verma
173:User:Chitresh verma
35:, Antipastor! I am
16:Well== Welcome! ==
1041:arbitration policy
70:How to edit a page
30:
1008:
1007:
140:
136:
130:
1067:
983:
976:
975:
936:
932:
910:
904:
852:Minerva Magazine
326:
320:
233:
212:Special:Newpages
139:
135:
132:
128:
126:
119:
113:
53:
47:
28:
1075:
1074:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1049:the voting page
1015:
974:
934:
930:
919:
902:
899:
892:
854:
810:
463:
353:
324:
316:
308:
289:
270:
176:
150:
133:
124:
117:
111:
85:Manual of Style
51:
45:
12:
11:
5:
1073:
1071:
1018:
1014:
1009:
1006:
1005:
990:
989:
984:
973:
970:
955:User:Jarry1250
918:
915:
891:
886:
885:
884:
853:
850:
809:
806:
805:
804:
769:
768:
767:
766:
765:
764:
763:
762:
761:
760:
759:
758:
757:
756:
728:
727:
726:
725:
724:
723:
722:
721:
720:
719:
718:
717:
707:Wandalstouring
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
675:
674:
673:
672:
671:
658:
657:
656:
655:
654:
653:
652:
651:
650:
649:
636:
635:
634:
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
615:
614:
613:
612:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
582:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
547:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
513:Wandalstouring
467:Wandalstouring
462:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
385:
384:
352:
349:
348:
347:
307:
304:
288:
285:
269:
264:
249:
248:
247:
246:
175:
169:
149:
146:
100:sign your name
88:
87:
82:
77:
72:
67:
62:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1072:
1063:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1013:
1010:
1004:
1000:
996:
992:
991:
988:
985:
982:
977:
971:
969:
968:
964:
960:
956:
951:
949:
945:
944:
938:
928:
923:
916:
914:
913:
909:
906:
905:
896:
890:
887:
883:
879:
875:
870:
869:
868:
867:
863:
859:
851:
849:
848:
844:
840:
835:
832:
829:
826:
823:
820:
817:
814:
807:
803:
799:
795:
790:
786:
785:
784:
783:
779:
775:
755:
751:
747:
742:
741:
740:
739:
738:
737:
736:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
716:
712:
708:
704:
703:
702:
698:
694:
690:
689:
688:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
682:
681:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
646:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
625:
624:
623:
622:
621:
620:
619:
618:
617:
616:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
583:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
537:
533:
529:
524:
523:
522:
518:
514:
509:
508:
507:
503:
499:
494:
493:
492:
488:
484:
479:
478:
477:
476:
472:
468:
460:
452:
448:
444:
439:
438:
437:
433:
429:
425:
424:
423:
419:
415:
411:
406:
401:
400:
399:
398:
394:
390:
383:
379:
375:
370:
369:
368:
367:
363:
359:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
333:
332:
331:
328:
327:
321:
319:
313:
305:
303:
302:
298:
294:
286:
284:
283:
279:
275:
268:
265:
263:
262:
258:
254:
245:
241:
237:
232:
227:
226:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
204:
203:
202:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
181:
174:
170:
168:
167:
163:
159:
155:
147:
145:
144:
141:
137:
127:
121:
116:
109:
105:
101:
97:
93:
86:
83:
81:
78:
76:
73:
71:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
56:
54:
50:
43:or by typing
42:
38:
34:
27:
21:
17:
1016:
986:
952:
941:
939:
924:
920:
900:
893:
855:
811:
770:
546:
464:
386:
354:
322:
317:
309:
290:
271:
250:
187:
177:
151:
122:
108:my talk page
106:, ask me on
89:
60:Introduction
44:
41:my talk page
31:
15:
774:Draganparis
746:Draganparis
693:Draganparis
410:Hephaestion
186:- because:
110:, or place
98:you should
1037:topic bans
874:Antipastor
858:Dougweller
794:Antipastor
528:Antipastor
498:Antipastor
483:Antipastor
443:Antipastor
414:Antipastor
337:Antipastor
96:talk pages
92:Wikipedian
75:Help pages
1033:site bans
959:LivingBot
180:CSD areas
995:Mugginsx
948:WP:MINOR
903:SilkTork
428:Mugginsx
389:Mugginsx
374:Mugginsx
358:Mugginsx
158:Dabomb87
293:Soler97
236:Kingpin
216:Kingpin
192:Kingpin
154:WP:VAND
37:Marek69
1023:. The
839:GK1973
405:WP:BRD
287:Thanks
253:Jingby
208:script
115:helpme
49:helpme
935:false
318:Jamie
306:Email
125:Marek
1057:talk
999:talk
963:talk
931:true
878:talk
862:talk
843:talk
798:talk
789:this
778:talk
750:talk
711:talk
697:talk
532:talk
517:talk
502:talk
487:talk
471:talk
447:talk
432:talk
418:talk
393:talk
378:talk
362:talk
341:talk
297:talk
278:talk
274:WWGB
257:talk
240:talk
220:talk
196:talk
162:talk
1017:Hi,
670:OK?
626:But
325:S93
1059:)
1035:,
1001:)
965:)
957:,
880:)
864:)
845:)
833:,
830:,
827:,
824:,
818:,
815:,
800:)
780:)
752:)
713:)
699:)
534:)
519:)
504:)
489:)
473:)
449:)
434:)
420:)
395:)
380:)
364:)
343:)
299:)
280:)
259:)
242:)
234:-
222:)
198:)
164:)
134:69
118:}}
112:{{
52:}}
46:{{
1055:(
997:(
961:(
907:*
876:(
860:(
841:(
796:(
776:(
748:(
709:(
695:(
530:(
515:(
500:(
485:(
469:(
445:(
430:(
416:(
391:(
376:(
360:(
339:(
295:(
276:(
255:(
238:(
218:(
194:(
160:(
129:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.