User talk:Astuishin/archive2

2123:

top. I further disagree that something that's listed in his Fox News bio is so important that it belongs in the primary facts about him. And as for your citing the Knowledge rule that one should Assume Good Faith -- well, one doesn't have to assume good faith forever. You clearly want the entry to be negative toward Alan Colmes. That's not good faith. One reason I say this is that you attach 3 sources to that sentence. Really, if you need 3 sources then it's obviously pretty contentious. It is a *fact* that Colmes does radio and TV. His relative liberalism is a matter of *opinion*. Therefore it belongs in the following paragraph, and that's where it stays now. You say I am not changing the article to reflect that belief? Excuse me, I haven't erased the Criticisms section. --

2012:

critics. Or maybe, as I think, the first section should include just the basic facts, and as I already pointed out, there is a criticism section to deal with those things you noted. Just because they're well sourced doesn't mean they belong in the first paragraph. Your version even omits his radio show. It's pretty clear you don't like him and want negative opinions in the first paragraph. That is POV. And I will keep correcting the page, too. You're welcome. --

4259: 3493: 3381: 3044: 2717: 1871: 1704: 1037: 31: 813: 963: 906: 638: 195: 119: 1819:

articles, which means you have screwed up everyone of those articles that had an image using the previous text field. Either revert your edits, go through all the articles and update the infoboxes, or re-add the "library logo" field to co-exist with the "image field" you have added. I personally prefer the "image field" over a logo, so that is an improvment, but we can just screw up all the other articles.

3910: 3110: 4032: 3832: 1980:

is wrong. Your version also includes 3 links to establish this and they all go to websites of his critics. Again, this is anything but neutral. I do agree there is a debate about whether Alan Colmes is a true blue liberal, and that's why there is a section for critics. That's fine. Let's please agree that the first section doesn't need to make Alan Colmes look like a liar. --

1094: 2584: 2027:

desire to stick to the basic facts and if questions of ideology are removed I wouldn't mine supplanting the disputed edits to the criticism section. 3) I can tell you're not quite as familiar with wikipedia as you could be, otherwise you probably would have refrained for stating that "I don't like Colmes", prehaps you examine the

2080:

response the he has from his critics commenting on his employment at fox news, there are plenty of radio talk show host. I have a subject view that Colmes ideological Claims are not very accurate, however that does not make any opposing argument objective simply because it is in opposition. You state the intro section should be

2701:. There is a directory form where you can search for members of the academies by name, institution, field, etc. Unfortunately I don't have bios for any of the ones without Knowledge articles. Information on those profs is difficult to find, as many of these professors retired long before Knowledge rise to prominence. 4140:

I've been in touch with the Wash U administration, and we've come to a compromise. As you know, they object to the official seal being used. The administration has agreed to use their "more unofficial" seal on Knowledge. Of course, the compromise means nothing if Knowledge editors want another image.

2500:

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work.

2161:

important fact about Colmes is that many liberal media critics reject his idealogical pronouncements, there are almost no media stories on him that do not include this controversy close to their opening phrases. And really there is no dispute about this. 3) I think you have misunderstood me, I didn't

2122:

The most important thing about Alan Colmes is that many liberals don't believe he is liberal enough? Well, that's a subjective interpretation. I would argue you wouldn't even know who Colmes is if he wasn't a TV and radio personality, so the TV and radio personality aspects of his career should go up

2089:

factual, I present, as a stated above, the fox news version of events and then I present the critics, both are clearly denoted and both are sourced. You state that you feel the articles criticism has a place and should be lumped to together at the end, but you don't seem to be changing the article to

2011:

Within the context of the whole article, yes is important to have those things. However, your version makes it seem as if his critics' opinions of him are just as important as the basic biographical details about him. If it was truly without POV maybe you would include Colmes, his supporters, and his

1292:

The last one, you just recreated with much of the same copied content! Rearranging the order of sentences and changing a word or two is not sufficient. You must contribute your own words, and only your own words to Knowledge. Now, seriously, please assist in finding and removing your past violations.

3440:

Funny how Schafly is the "conservative, anti-feminist activist" Schafly, yet you decided it was prudent to scrub Harry Belafonte's page of the link to a list of American liberals. Aren't we supposed to be proud of our liberalism, comrade? Totally forgot that Belafonte met with Hugo Chavez. Thanks

1979:

Atsuishin, I think you are wrong to keep changing the first paragraph of the Alan Colmes article to reflect the views of his critics. I'm a little newer to Knowledge than you but I am sure that it's unfair to the article's neutrality for the opening paragraph to state that the subject of the article

471:

Google hits don't accurately measure the notability of the 90s athletes as well as the do 21st century athletes. We can go to AFD if you want. I will contest any suggestion of removal and want the tag removed. My guess is that she is considered important enough by her accomplishments to stay. Reply

4078:

deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Knowledge's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that

3880:

425:

I find it hard to believe you are contesting Jennifer Martz' notability. If you are trying to prompt me to rewrite the article, the world is sparse on details about her as she excelled just prior to the real boom in the internet. I would welcome credible help. I will remove your tag without reply

2207:

I apologize for not commenting again, but I have been traveling. Anyway I thought your last version was much more fair, removing even the left vs. right aspect of the show makes sense to me. My grounds are just that including facts about subjective opinions are best left out of the main paragraph.

2050:

Maybe I haven't persuaded you just yet, but you haven't persuaded me either. I think your personal arguments about where Colmes stands are all fine and I don't even completely disagree... but they simply don't belong in the first paragraph. There is a criticism section, and that's where it goes. I

2026:

1) what supporters? I doubt there are many people outside the Fox News PR office that would describe Colmes at best as a moderate democrat (DLC), if you can provide some other prominent critics on the left, however I'd by open to changing my mind. 2) on the basic facts; I very much agree with your

1202:

article that you contributed just two weeks ago, I strongly suggest that you conduct a careful and thorough review of all of the contributions that you have made to Knowledge in order to find and remove any other violations of copyright that you have introduced. This may take a very long time, but

1959:

I changed from Administration to Presidency because it reflects a larger subject matter. The "Administration" only reflect those officials that served under a President during his term of office while "Presidency" includes all officials, events, and other matters relating his tenure as President.

4234:. The edit summary said "fix awkward wording" but it deleted informative and well-sourced information. Also the population density surrounding Wash U's campus reflect an urban density not suburban. Just wanted to let you know cause I know you make many productive edits for Wikipeda. Thanks! 601:

Just so you are aware the construction of the Chicago Spire has not yet officially begun. They have started digging at the site, but Shelbourne and the rest of the community don't consider the building "officially" under construction yet. As soon as they start inserting caissons into the earth

245:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 169:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 2079:

I'm unclear about your argument, introductions are suppose to include the most notable thing about a person or subject, so for instance Jane Fonda is a Oscar winning actor but her article mentions the role she played during the Vietnam war. Colmes would probably not be very notable, save of the

1818:

when editing, that is actually cautioned against with templates. I'm all for improvment, but it needs to be done correctly, and with the library template it was not done correctly. If you click on the "what links here" link for the template you will see that the template is used on more than 50

2051:

refer to my point about how the intro section should be limited to factual information and not be colored by views of his critics. There is a place for that. And again, your version leaves out his radio show, which he has done for longer than Hannity & Colmes. Reverted, you're welcome.--

1348:, which covers all of the text in the project, requires that we keep track of all of the contributors. If you do not indicate the source of the material, it there is no link the the text's earlier history and the earlier contributors do not receive the attribution that the GFDL requires. 3526:. Thank you. If active, put "Active in project since MM/YYYY. Active as of MM/YYYY" where MM and YYYY represent approximate time you joined the project. Make sure anyone you think is active in the project has signed up on the project page and the last time you confirmed your activity.-- 1491:

I felt, and still feel, that the main picture of Brookings Hall is slightly depressing and does not give an accurate scope of the structure. I only want to improve the page though, and if you feel that it is the best picture of Brookings Hall, I am fine to leave it. Thanks

2925:

I'm really new to wikipedia but I work in the communications office of the Brown School of Social Work. I have been given permission to use copyrighted info to create a page on wikipedia. Is this not allowed? Is there some way to verify that I have been given permission?

2212:'s entry does not say "many critics argue he blends fiction with fact in a way that does disservice to popular conceptions of recent history" although this is undoubtedly true. Instead, this is in a "Controversy" section on his page. Anyway, glad we could resolve this. -- 2084:

which of course is obviously why I have been editing the current articles state. It is not a fact, in my view that Colmes is "Liberal". Fortunately its is also the view share by many critics who self identify as liberals. furthermore nothing in the opening section is

2601:. We've recently built the project page and started a drive to improve St. Louis related articles. Please take a look to edit an article or add one of your own. Once an article's status has been agreed upon, feel free to stop by and lend a hand in getting it to 1013:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 937:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 688:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 3301:

of the WikiProject Universities newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you for your continued support of

3018:

2965:

2847:

2548:

1931:

1647:

1534:

2166:

the article to reflect your views on the article(as opposed to keeping the inadequate status quot). 4) i will try to re-word the opening sentence if you like. But i still don't really understand the grounds that you object to my edits of the article. thanks

1683:

because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Knowledge (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its

1115:

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

1112:. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. 1339:

One more thing, also fairly important. When you need to copy content from one Knowledge page to another, such as when you are splitting a large article into two, you must indicate the source of the material where you do the pasting. An

4080: 3882: 3716:

Thanks for signing up to help us put out a newsletter. Do you think we can shoot for a September 1 newsletter? Basically, it should 1) describe the new leadership and organization; 2) mention new articles in August from

1231:

were also completely copied from other websites, and I have deleted them both. Now that the magnitude of the problem is clear, I must insist that you stop all other editing and begin a thorough review of every one the

3670:

if you would be willing to serve as a leader of the project from September 1, 2008 to February 28, 2009. The various leadership responsibilities are listed there. The roles will be somewhat similar to the roles of

1530: 2961: 2544: 1927: 2843: 1643: 4118:. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Knowledge policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted. 834:

in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

356:

873:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on

391:

3297: 3014: 2449: 987:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found 662:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found 219:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found 143:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found 1009:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

933:

684:

241:

165:

780:}}. It was previously flagged for having not having neutral pov and I have made an effort to correct this. I would appreciate any help, pointers, or specific examples to correct any remaining issues. 455:

She is a high ranked former D3 vollyball player, how does that make her relevant? I did a google search and very hits came up. Yes she's on the internet but how does that make her notable?- thank you

3666:

as either an active or semi-active member. The response to the project membership survey was strong enough that we should attempt to organize it in a more fully functional way. Please sign up at

1503:

I would like to inquire as to why you changed the term Team Members, to Employees? I do realize they are the same thing, but we at United Supermarkets refer to each other as team members. Thanks

1006:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

681:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

238:

is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

162:

is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

2892:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

2667:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

1576:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

1139: 3272:

if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at

2990: 1379:

for examples. Notice that the second section of the infobox is displaying "]". Does something need to be altered in the articles, or in the template itself? Thank you for your help,

1293:

You can not expect others to clean up you mess. Writing new content and replacing deleted content is not nearly as important as making sure the project complies with copyright law.

1069:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 267:

Hi, I just wanted to thank you for converting the article into a wikitable, it must have take a while to get through such a huge list. Are you active on other law-related articles?

93:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 4330:. We are hoping to bring the list of category members to a total of 50. Either you have participated in past votes and discussions or you have recently signed up to be a part of 3413:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 3076:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 2749:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1903:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1736:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1236:

that you have made since joining Knowledge. As I said in my last message, which has mysteriously disappeared, the process may take a very long time, but is extremely important.

4160:

The new compromise logo looks fine. I don't object to it. I still would like to see the picture of brookings in the template box, but I don't feel strongly about it either way.

3409: