User talk:Atlantis536 - Knowledge (XXG)

2967:

neither site should be used as sources, and, as many people have explained to you, there is no single, authoritative source for any phylogeny, so it's alright if different people have different ideas on how taxa are related. Finally, your way of correcting mistakes (insisting that certain taxa are only in the positions you believe they are and repeating those claims over and over again) is problematic, which is one reason why you got blocked here in the first place. But I'm glad you grew out of that.

3342:

example, speed-readers might see "United" and automatically think it says "United Kingdom" or "United States", but if they see a mostly red flag with blue in the corner, they will understand it's from the US, and if they see a mostly blue flag with a red and white cross in the middle, it's from the UK. Also, the "xxxx in paleontology" pages have had flags from over a decade and no one objected to them, so it's good to keep them for consistency.

3813: 3231: 1830: 1254: 610: 278: 205: 1647: 3561: 1557: 3522: 526: 1115: 1005: 703: 527:

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-paleontology/article/new-smallbodied-ornithopods-dinosauria-neornithischia-from-the-early-cretaceous-wonthaggi-formation-strzelecki-group-of-the-australianantarctic-rift-system-with-revision-of-qantassaurus-intrepidus-rich-and-vickersrich-1999/D6FEF2CD3EC1CAAD8F41B6ED73EC356C

2893:

OK so, it all started when I discovered DeviantArt on August (the month of my birthday), but it wasn't until October when I started the behaviour. Then, when I stumbled around on your DA page, I found your cladograms. To me they did not look very well written and I did indeed think that they had some

830:

Thanks. The first subsection is always expanded though, and takes a lot of space. I really would argue that we should collapse them per default, though I just see that it is possible to collapse/expand on an per-article basis ("state=collapsed"). But I can ask first at WikiProject Paleontology if you

3341:

I didn't readd the flags simply because they "add color"; what I meant to say is that, no matter the monitor size, the unique color schemes of flags can help people understand that certain dinosaurs lived in the same place, even at a glance. Not everyone will get the idea purely from text alone; for

806:

Honestly, I have no stance. The reason I made the templates expanded is because that's how they were before and that I was unaware of that discussion. Sorry. Besides, the Theropoda and Sauropodomorpha templates, despite their size, would only show their unexpanded subsections when set as "expanded",

2796:

Oh, hey Magnatyrannus. Long time no chat. I wonder what caused your sudden reform. Just six months ago you were childish and wanted to force people to accept your ideas of dinosaur phylogeny. Now you're formal, well-spoken and interested in Cenozoic topics. I wonder what happened (although remember

348:

Hello! I am OviraptorFan, although I had been working here for a couple weeks now, I now have an account! Anyways, there are alot of dinosaur genera that haven't been placed into the scientific groups they belong in. So I have been working on putting them there so they don't remain forgotten, would

2819:

activity (i.e. editing on the pages I, as Magnatyrannus did) and adopted a new interest, such as South American mammals. However, it only took 2 months for me to get CU blocked. After that, I reappealed my block on the 27th of July and my unblock request was partially accepted. Tamzin reblocked me

1714:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

3356:

I do appreciate the work you're doing, even though I think the flags spoil it. Wouldn't you be better off with simply "US" and "UK": very distinguishable, and you have a horizontal space crisis on your hands. I hope we're not catering for readers who don't bother to read to the right of "United",

2935:

was published prior to the molecular based phylogenies, which recovers megalocnids as basal to all other sloths. I still sometimes complain about WP:SYNTH but at least I'm honest about it being WP:SYNTH. I thought that if people treated taxa as synonyms on cladograms, then Knowledge (XXG) should

2137:

If you'd ask me, I'll document the evolution of pterosaurs, maybe lagerpetids in Triassic South America, basal pterosaurs in Triassic Italy, the pterosaurs of Solnhofen, the anurognathids and darwinopterans of Tiaojishan, the pterodactyloids of Early Cretaceous Brazil, the pteranodontians of the

1213:

Thank you for your kind words. As for why/how I'm doing this, it mostly boils down to the fact that I'm interested in paleontology myself, which is why I try to keep up with the literature (mostly by checking journal websites, but sometimes I find out from a reference in a different paper, from

2966:

DeviantArt is not Knowledge (XXG), so it doesn't follow the strict "no original research/synthesis" rule Knowledge (XXG) has. While Knowledge (XXG) can only report on what scientific literature says, DeviantArt users can have their own opinions, as long as they are not too controversial. Also,

3145:

In the first chapter of my WWD reimagining fanfic, a mother Coelophysis will get horribly wounded from a smaller animal defending itself from being eaten, which get infected and she slowly dies as a result, but I do not know exactly what type of animal would be perfect for the role.

379:

Pretty much dinosaurs that simply aren’t shown on the family tree lists. For example, gobiraptor wasn’t on the oviraptorid list until I added it(it was back when I still didn’t have an account and just did it anonymous) so things like that. Did that help you understand what I meant?

290:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

217:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1214:

Dinosaur Mailing List, Twitter, or just by accident), and, taking the sheer volume of the literature into account, why I find it helpful to have a resource where all of this can be written down. But I'm glad to hear that someone besides me finds these articles useful. Regards --

1679:, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the 2726:

Episode 7 would have Tyrannosaurus rex, Edmontosaurus annectens, Triceratops prorsus, Denversaurus schlessmani, Quetzalcoatlus lawsoni, Dakotaraptor steini, Ornithomimus velox, "Styginetta lofgreni", Borealosuchus sternbergii, Axestemys infernalis, Purgatorius ceratops.

2715:

Episode 4 would have Sinornithosaurus millenii, Confuciusornis sanctus, Eopteranodon lii, Caudipteryx zoui, Sinosauropteryx prima, Sinocalliopteryx gigas, Repenomamus giganticus, Psittacosaurus lujiatunensis, Beipiaosaurus inexpectus, Yutyrannus huali, Liaoningotitan

1337:

Hi Atlantis 536. Please help me figure it out ;) What's the difference between "Gorgosaurus" and "Gorgosaur". In some places it has "SAURUS" and in some places it has "SAUR". I saw this pattern for many dinosaurs. which one is correct? and what's the difference?

1778:

Some paleontologists says the formation belongs to Aptian-Albian, some says it's from Turonian to Campanian. The Berthasaura page you created is said to be Late Cretaceous, but the scientific paper says it's from Early Cretaceous. What's the best to choose?

3424:

Sorry if I'm being dumb. The article for 2022 contains a reference titled: "The effects of skull flattening on suchian jaw muscle evolution". But the summary appears to be in the opposite direction: "A study on the musculature of crocodylian and fossil

4064:

A new paper dropped by Fenollosa et al. (2024) described a new specimen of Dacentrurus in Spain, and suggests Miragaia as a synonym. But conversely a 2019 paper describing a more complete specimen from Portugal actually dismiss the synonymy…

2711:

Episode 3 would have Camarasaurus lentus, Supersaurus vivianae, Stegosaurus stenops, Allosaurus fragilis, Ceratosaurus nasicornis, Camptosaurus dispar, Nanosaurus agilis, Hesperornithoides miessleri, Harpactognathus gentryii, Fruitafossor

2828:

over the course of my block. I was set to be released today at 4:36 P.M, and now I am here on Knowledge (XXG). I've changed my attitude because if I wanted to edit again, then I should act more civil to other editors and no POV pushing.

2719:

Episode 5 would have Spinosaurus aegyptiacus, Nicorhynchus fluviferox, Apatorhamphus gyrostega, Leptostomia begaaensis, Rebbachisaurus garasbae, Carcharodontosaurus saharicus, Araripesuchus rattoides, Aegisuchus witmeri, Onchopristis

3039:

And hey, did you know talk pages aren't supposed to be used mainly for miscellaneous communication? That means you should come to talk pages mostly to talk about editing Knowledge (XXG) or explaining facts, not pop culture remakes.

1430:

website. I tend to add examples to the articles about the last few years in paleontology and rarely edit older articles, because listing every discovery from every single year in the history of paleontology would be impossible for

2405:

as it is also a large, bipedal herbivore. The whole episode will be in South America instead of North America as that is where dinosaurs really started, and also to showcase the weird non-dinosaurian wonders of the Triassic.

2034:

Not so sure. Also, I have doubts that those specimens are actually anurognathids, as they look too vague for identification. But until serious scientific papers are released, don't add hoax taxa anywhere on Knowledge (XXG).

3858: 3276: 1873: 1297: 653: 318: 245: 2708:

Episode 2 would have Plesiosaurus dolichodeirus, Ichthyosaurus communis, Temnodontosaurus platyodon, Hybodus reticulatus, Dimorphodon macronyx, Sarcosaurus woodi, Scelidosaurus harrisonii, Coroniceras bucklandi.

853:

I see. It appears the templates were set to "autocollapse", which makes them appear collapsed even if the template is set to open on a particular subsection on a page. I guess I'll revert them to "collapsed".

3614: 3912:

You can start it in a new subpage to your user page (basically just go to your userpage, then in the addressbar put a / after your username and follow that by the name you want the new subpage to have)

2576:

Also, if you’re who I think you are, weren’t you sent to ANI for talking about fan fiction? Respectfully, please stop talking to me, unless it’s to clear up facts or information about Knowledge (XXG).

3842:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3710:

When creating a redirect from a related taxon, please check the target article to ensure that an ordinary reader will understand why they have been redirected to that specific article. Cheers, · · ·

3260:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1857:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1281:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 637:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 302:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 229:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1957: 1916: 1145: 1035: 724: 1403:

until someone else added it. I'm not intentionally ignoring this journal, though, and if memory serves, in the past I added several studies published there to the "year in paleontology" pages.--

788: 1229:

You're welcome. I believe the Dinosaur Mailing List found your work helpful too (If I remember correctly, they especially liked how you update the minor things about the articles themselves!)

3827: 3245: 1843: 1267: 623: 3404:

Re scheduling vs discovery: "scheduling" in this context means that a scientific paper about paleontology is scheduled to be published in a journal in 2023. I'll try to make that clearer.

3449:

sorted it out already. If you ever find problems with these "xxxx in paleontology" pages, you can always count on him. He'll sort things out professionally, no matter what they may be.

3997:

Hello!! It's nice to hear my work inspired some of your reconstructions and I wanted to stop in and say I really like the reconstructions you've posted to the paleontology board!! :)

3751:, rather than the species? It is currently just a redirect to another topic. It wouldn't be too much effort to correct the pages that link to the redirect to go to the proper target ( 1915:

Do you think that we will find ceratopsid genera in South America sooner or later since there have been saurolophine hadrosaurs and nodosaurs discovered in South America already?

3639:

I saw you added Suzana Herculano-Houzel's new theropod/neuron paper to 2022 in archosaur paleontology. Is there a reason you added it to that page instead of the 2023 page? -

1758:

I was in the middle of adding more content when you placed the speedy deletion notice. Now that it has more content, I removed the notice. Apologies if I've made any mistake.

3617:

after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

3501:

Mostly it's the result of my duties elsewhere, which in fact will likely force me to reduce my activity here - at the very least during the upcoming month or so. Regards

3357:

either. Now, can you distinguish the Australian from the New Zealand flag? Go on, try ... Won't the flags also jar with "Images", when you start to fill the final column?

3598: 3535: 1594: 3429:

jaws, and on the implications for the impact of skull flattening on muscle anatomy of suchians." (I streamlined the summary, but didn't change its direction.)

965: 2462:

Sauropodomorphs were not the major herbivores of Late Triassic South America, and I already have an equivalent to every animal in the original New Blood.

3568: 3376:"This article records new taxa of every kind of fossil archosaur described during 2023, as well as other significant discoveries and events related to 807:

and a subsection would only be expanded when specified on an article. For example {{Sauropodomorpha|B.}} would only expand the basal sauropod section.

189: 151: 3068:

That shouldn't be reason enough to use talk pages to talk about fan fiction. Talk pages are for helping others edit Knowledge (XXG) and learn facts.

1636: 38: 1609:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 1564: 787:, do you feel strongly about having this template (and others) expanded by default rather than collapsed? The collapsed state was requested in a 62: 69: 2158:

If you were to remake Walking with Dinosaurs episode, Giant of the Skies, what setting and animals would you use for the world spanning story?

2894:

mistakes. I believed that people should follow what is said in the literature and on Knowledge (XXG) and that people should avoid engaging in

1372:, but it is based on the genus name. When referring to the genus, always use the "-saurus", although you can use "saur" in informal contexts. 1432: 1418:

I noticed that you also brought this subject up in the WikiProject Palaeontology talk page, so I will also add that the horse you mentioned,

1404: 1215: 961: 3881: 3299: 2023: 1896: 1319: 675: 579:

you about this. Please let me know if I can help you in any way at all about the English language Knowledge (XXG). Peter in Australia ak --

332: 259: 3370:, as well as other significant discoveries and events related to paleontology of archosaurs that are scheduled to occur in the year 2023." 1610: 1475:. is it junior synonym or probable junior synonym of "Euskelosaurus"? (cause it has a separate page). And there's one more; in the letter 438:

I actually did alot of the B's, except Bienosaurus. Because of that, I created the Scelidosauridae, think you can help me with that page?

2861:

Also, I am able to give you a good explanation of my childish behaviour and why I pushed my POV onto other people's dinosaur taxonomies.

3473:

Excellent. It's great to see such a narrowly scoped, specialised class of articles. I wish you and your colleagues well in building it.

2957: 2870: 2838: 2787: 2560: 1794: 1128:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge (XXG)! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

1018:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge (XXG)! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

3686:

That's weird. The media reports only link directly to the PDF on wiley.com, which doesn't have the 2023 date. Guess I'll move it then.

1961: 1920: 3401:

Re the flags: I'd rather have both the flags and text together, so that no matter what people look for, they can get the information.

2811:

It's an extremely long story. After I socked for the second time, I tried to sock again after the first attempt was unsuccessful (as

1719:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 1177: 1156: 1102: 1067: 1046: 992: 738: 690: 2056: 467:

Now I'm done with the C's. You're doing a really good job, keep it up. I mostly put sauropodomorphs which were strangely forgotten.

22: 3383:

I'm scratching my head about scheduling vs discovery. How can discoveries be scheduled? Could it be worded better for non-experts?

791:

and met with agreement there. The templates are just too large and overwhelming. We can discuss at the WikiProject if you wish. --

1613:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 1141: 1031: 734: 52: 3877: 3316:

I think you like the flags because they add colour. Who, among readers, will recognise the Texan flag? Is it really so hard to

3295: 1892: 1315: 671: 328: 255: 3851: 3269: 1866: 1656: 1290: 1173: 1152: 1063: 1042: 646: 311: 238: 57: 3747:

Hey, I noticed you just started a page for the new sauropodomorph. Is there any reason that it shouldn't be located at the

185: 147: 3960: 3001:

If you were to remake Walking with Dinosaurs episode, Spirits of the Ice Forest, what setting and animals would you use?

1950:

It is taking so long for such an important fossil genus to be given the respect of a published scientific name already.

1716: 1696: 453:

The page looks good as of now. We'll just see what the other dinosaur experts of Knowledge (XXG) would do with the page.

3668:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think you are referring to the accepted date, not the date it was made available online (

3935: 3863: 3281: 1878: 1302: 658: 323: 250: 1684: 1663: 121:. Could you please point me to a peer-reviewed article which used the term? And what exactly does it mean? Thank you 3782:

I don’t really have an opinion, but I’m pretty sure the Qianlong Emperor is the more notable topic. The only reason

3363:

Could I suggest improvements to the lead, which is hard to parse at the moment (particularly where I've italicised)?

3618: 3604: 2705:

Episode 1 is not yet decided whether to use the Chinle formation, Ischigualasto formation or Santa maria formation.

1614: 1600: 2948:), then people on DA shouldn't treat them as synonyms as well. Will discuss more soon but now I've got to go now. 2600:

If you were to remake Walking with Dinosaurs episode, Death of a Dynasty, what setting and animals would you use?

1700: 885: 836: 796: 501: 43: 29: 3906: 3654:

The date given on the journal website is December 15, 2022, even though the media only reported on it in 2023.

3201: 3188: 3151: 3131: 3087: 3059: 3006: 2754: 2732: 2681: 2605: 2523: 2491: 2453: 2425: 2381: 2336: 2290: 2258: 2203: 2163: 2127: 2089: 2019: 1436: 1408: 1219: 784: 3839: 3257: 2821: 1854: 1278: 951: 634: 409:

Update: I'm done with the A's. I deliberately excluded the dubious dinosaurs. Will do the other letters soon.

299: 226: 181: 143: 3958:

All of those methods will give you some easier breathing room than just an edit summary. Anyway, good job on

2564: 4076: 3601:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 2953: 2866: 2834: 2783: 2184:

And I'll definitely not rewrite Knowledge (XXG) and throw temper tantrums to make the site match my remake.

1790: 1597:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 1476: 1472: 1199: 1172:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

1062:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

497: 118: 2011: 1953: 1782: 1692: 955: 177: 139: 80: 2764:

I'm not that much of an expert on Cenozoic and Paleozoic topics, so please don't ask me about WWB or WWM.

443: 385: 354: 2331:

If you were to remake Walking with Dinosaurs episode, New Blood, what setting and animals would you use?

1972:

I cannot say. But until a paper is out, you shouldn't add it to the 2022 in archosaur paleontology page.

1680: 92: 3714: 3573: 3506: 3320:"US" and "Texas" as text? On my monitor the flags squash the text into a most ungainly appearance: it's 2060: 1569: 1343: 84: 2825: 2749:

If you were to remake Walking with Beasts episode, Sabertooth, what setting and animals would you use?

73: 3585:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 3502: 3446: 1581:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 25:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: 3544: 3533:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at

3124: 2931:

lived in the Caribbean as per the other megalocnids. Also, do keep in mind that the study describing

2122:

If You were to make a documentary styled story about pterosaurs, what kind of setting would you use?

938:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

881: 832: 792: 33: 3821: 3239: 2936:

classify them as synonyms, and that if Knowledge (XXG) doesn't treat certain taxa as synonyms (e.g.

1837: 1691:

for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on

1671:

Hello, and welcome to Knowledge (XXG). This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on

1261: 617: 286: 213: 72:, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Knowledge (XXG). You can visit 4068:

One of the authors in the 2024 paper includes the one who proposes the synonymy of Miragaia first.

3184: 3147: 3127: 3083: 3055: 3002: 2750: 2728: 2677: 2601: 2535:

was a straight carnivore and the top predator of its environment, making it a perfect stand-in for

2519: 2487: 2449: 2421: 2377: 2332: 2286: 2254: 2199: 2159: 2123: 2085: 2015: 1339: 3920: 3835: 3253: 1850: 1274: 630: 295: 222: 4072: 4031: 4002: 3968: 2949: 2862: 2830: 2779: 1992:

Are We ever going to discover any more anurognathid pterosaurs from the Cretaceous period soon?

1786: 1537: 1484: 1195: 1140:. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they 1030:. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they 1027: 2895: 2908: 1514:

because its description was suppressed because of plaigiarism, but is also a junior synonym of

91:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out 3772: 3677: 3644: 3530: 1626: 981: 947: 584: 555: 511: 439: 381: 350: 3847: 3539:

and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

3265: 2903: 2816: 1862: 1726: 1688: 1286: 642: 576: 307: 234: 4041: 4013: 3978: 3870: 3791: 3752: 3724: 3711: 3687: 3669: 3655: 3626: 3450: 3405: 3343: 3288: 3205: 3170: 3097: 3069: 3041: 2968: 2880: 2848: 2812: 2798: 2765: 2692: 2635: 2577: 2540: 2505: 2463: 2435: 2407: 2363: 2300: 2272: 2240: 2185: 2139: 2099: 2071: 2036: 1973: 1931: 1885: 1806: 1759: 1519: 1468: 1446: 1373: 1309: 1230: 911: 855: 813: 720: 665: 575:

Apologies for the Reddit mention. Yes, in some ways I was just joking. I in no way meant to

565: 530: 468: 454: 424: 410: 396: 365: 166: 128: 3916: 3850:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3843: 3268:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3261: 1865:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1858: 1676: 1289:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1282: 645:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 638: 310:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 303: 237:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 230: 3947: 3740: 3540: 3479: 3435: 3391: 3330: 2173:

First of all, I'll set it in the Maastrichtian instead of the Aptian-Albian, and focus on

1730: 1137: 2899: 733:. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can 525:

Rich and Vickers-Rich 1999", though I may be wrong. Here's the link to the paper itself:

2820:

from indef CU block to temporary block that lasted for only a month in order to satisfy

958:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 3595:

was first mentioned in a scientific paper in 1989, but was only formally named in 2004?

1479:, "Euacanthus" is nomen nudum and junior synonym at the same time! is it true? Thanks. 1185: 1075: 757: 484: 159:

Thanks for clarifying. I have added the term in the terminology section of the article

1675:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

4027: 3998: 3965: 3763: 3590: 3580: 3526: 2938: 2723:

Episode 6 is not yet decided, since I do not know what kind of setting to use for it.

1711: 1672: 1640: 1586: 1576: 1533: 1480: 1091: 1011: 996: 972:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

769: 102: 4026:

Nothing specific, they are nice to look at overall and I really like your artstyle!

2138:

Western Interior Seaway, and azhdarchids around the world in the latest Cretaceous.

504:

appears to be unrelated to this particular article. Could you possibly explain this?

3964:! :) I've updated the taxonomy template so that the taxobox has the quote marks. - 3768: 3673: 3640: 3016:

Change the setting from Antarctica to Australia, replace the "polar allosaur" with

2918: 2778:

Perhaps you should ask me about WWB, seeing as I am interested in Cenozoic topics.

1622: 1423: 977: 973: 580: 551: 507: 48: 3812: 3230: 1829: 1253: 730: 609: 277: 204: 1995: 3560: 2944: 2914: 1715:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

1556: 709: 694: 550:

and other online scholarly journal access. I'll fix that up ASAP. Pete AU aka --

364:

Exactly what do you mean by "placed into the scientific groups they belong in"?

161: 123: 500:

reference you started this article with appears to be from 1999, not 2019. Its

3608: 3521: 3474: 3430: 3386: 3325: 2923: 2181:. It would follow the pterosaur's journey from Jordan to Morocco to Tennessee. 2003: 1604: 1121: 1106: 3324:

to make sense of. Perhaps your browser window is very wide. That's abnormal.

2420:

Will there still be a prosauropod? and what other animals would be featured?

1151:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

1041:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

4080: 4049: 4035: 4021: 4006: 3986: 3971: 3885: 3799: 3776: 3732: 3717: 3695: 3681: 3663: 3648: 3629: 3548: 3510: 3484: 3458: 3440: 3413: 3396: 3351: 3335: 3303: 3213: 3192: 3178: 3155: 3135: 3105: 3091: 3077: 3063: 3049: 3010: 2976: 2961: 2888: 2874: 2856: 2842: 2806: 2791: 2773: 2758: 2736: 2700: 2685: 2643: 2609: 2585: 2568: 2548: 2527: 2513: 2495: 2471: 2457: 2443: 2429: 2415: 2385: 2371: 2340: 2308: 2294: 2280: 2262: 2248: 2207: 2193: 2167: 2147: 2131: 2107: 2093: 2079: 2064: 2044: 2027: 1981: 1965: 1939: 1924: 1900: 1814: 1798: 1767: 1752: 1630: 1541: 1527: 1488: 1454: 1440: 1412: 1381: 1347: 1323: 1238: 1223: 1203: 1095: 985: 919: 889: 863: 840: 821: 800: 773: 679: 588: 559: 538: 515: 492:

The doi for this ozzy boi - oops, we're not on Reddit - let's start again.

476: 462: 447: 432: 418: 404: 389: 373: 358: 336: 263: 172: 134: 107: 3748: 1655:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

1086: 939: 3854:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3272:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2661:

Episode 2: Marine reptiles and the dawn of the age of dinosaurs proper.

1869:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1510:

and a junior synonym at the same time. For example, "Ajancingenia" is a

1426:, while 2013 seems to be just the year of the online publication on the 1293:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1155:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

1045:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

737:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

649:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

314:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

241:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3831:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3757: 3249:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2376:

Why is that? and what about the cynodont, dicynodont, and prosauropod?

1847:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1687:

desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see

1271:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

627:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1706:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

729:

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

3426: 1114: 1004: 702: 2676:

Episode 7: Hell creek dinosaurs and K-Pg mass extinction survivors

2664:

Episode 3: Sauropods and other wildlife of the Morrison formation.

1360:

is the genus name, the first part of its scientific name, like the

1184:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

1074:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

756:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

3366:"This article records new taxa of fossil archosaurs of every kind 943: 547: 88: 21:

Hello, Atlantis536, and welcome to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for

1124:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 1014:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 712:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 3867:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3285:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2299:

Unnamed speculative enantiornitheans. 06:57, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

1882:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1306:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 662:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 543:

Thank you for explaining that. TIL... oops, we're not on Reddit.

3857:

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

3825:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All

3275:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

3243:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

2670:

Episode 5: Spinosaurus and the pterosaurs of the Kem Kem group

1872:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

1368:. "Gorgosaur" is a common name, as "dog" is the common name of 1296:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

652:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

564:

Okay, thanks. Also, do you have Reddit or are you just joking?

521:

I think it's because the end of the paper title is the phrase "

317:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

244:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

2055:

I would love to chat with you on discord if that is the case.

1841:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

1265:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

2921:

just because the latter was recovered as the sister taxon to

3183:

Which one would you recommend, Vancleavea or Hesperosuchus?

2559:

Why did you have to go for the most boring option possible?

1721: 1645: 1113: 1003: 701: 3200:

Also, I see an anonymous user has posted something on your

2634:

And can you please stop commenting? It's getting annoying.

1506:, which is why it has its own page. Also, a taxon can be a 101:, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 3790:

character, is simply not notable enough for its own page.

1725:, or if you have already done so, you can place a request 2797:

that I don't want you to go back to your previous ways.)

1162:

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the

1052:

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the

745:

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the

2658:

Episode 1: Triassic oddities and the earliest dinosaurs

621:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

3838: