431:
863:
778:
566:
382:
293:
92:
someone changed it to "emphasize" which not only changed the form, but also messed up the grammar of the sentence. When I reverted it, someone changed it back to "emphasized" so naturally, I reverted it again. This was not done out of malice, but I thought I was following the MoS. Anyway, I've stopped all that now, so I hope I can be unblocked.
247:
I'm sorry for the puppet thing, too, I didn't know the rule. I just wanted you to actually check to see that I was indeed simply reverting the article, not changing it - as you simply put "reverting vandalism" I thought you thought I was vandalising it when I was simply reverting it in good faith, as
243:
Actually, the disruption stopped when you explained that the article shouldn't be a mix of
British and American English. As I said, if you'd explained it sooner, I'd have stopped sooner. I put "MoS" in all my edit summaries, so that should have told you that I thought the MoS was on my side - yet you
179:
Well, I thought I was in the right as regards the Okay article - as I say, I thought the MoS was on my side. It wasn't until it was explained properly to me that I realised. Anyway, that's all in the past now, and I would appreciate another chance. Please? I promise, my disruptive posts have stopped.
187:
Also, I thought I was being accused of changing the word rather than reverting it, and the reasons why it should not have been left as it was were not made clear originally. The fact that I didn't know I was blocked until I tried to fix that quotation problem in a different article surely shows that
91:
My disruptive activities stopped some time ago, and my most recent edits have been constructive. The only possible exception is when I repeatedly put "emphasised" back into the Okay article, because I misinterpreted the MoS. I thought it meant that the original form of the word should be there, and
183:
I also didn't realise that what I was doing counted as sock puppetry - I didn't know the rule. The reason why I put that message there was because I was trying to clarify that I was not actually changing the spelling of "emphasizes" - but reverting it to how it was before, and I thought, quite
648:
deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with
Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines.
244:
didn't explain it to me at first, which is why I carried on reverting it! I hope that makes sense. Anyway, when you DID explain it to me, that's when I stopped reverting it, and I didn't find out I was blocked until I tried to fix the quotes in a completely unrelated article.
403:
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on
400:. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
584:
infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of
191:
Anyway, enough of that. I'm sorry, please unblock me and I'll behave, I promise. I tell you what - please give me another chance, and if I blow it, you can ban me again instantly. Can't say fairer than that, surely?
184:
simply, that I was being ignored. Since I thought the MoS was on my side, it would have been nice to have been told WHY it might not have been, then I would have stopped reverting the article much sooner.
801:
811:
to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only
804:, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.
251:
Anyway, I added to the above section this: I tell you what - please give me another chance, and if I blow it, you can ban me again instantly. Can't say fairer than that, surely?
826:. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found
600:
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow
Knowledge (XXG) to use the text â which means allowing other people to modify it â then you must include
533:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
815:, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at
445:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge (XXG)'s
530:
95:
Also, how can this account be a sock puppet of itself? This is my ONLY account, and I only registered it today. I haven't got any other accounts at all. Honest!
98:
Please unblock me, and I'll make an effort to contribute - in fact, I was attempting to correct quotations' punctuation when I realised I was blocked. Thanks!
476:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
211:âall in the pastâ that in your plea above you deceptively referred to having ceased to be disruptive âsome time agoâ? (The fact that you now offer an
481:
613:
450:
609:
147:
446:
880:
269:
in great detail, and it is clear that I misunderstood the MoS. Having read this person's reply, it all makes perfect sense to me now.
485:
48:
43:
438:
223:
disruption between your last claim of reform and the block, and that the disruption itself continued up until the block.) â
604:
the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the
26:
763:
547:
506:
831:
526:
454:
53:
397:
808:
529:. I do not feel that this article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at
33:
22:
749:
737:
716:. This has been done because the page is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer (see
413:
60:
339:
I appreciate it. No more disruptive posts, I promise! My first constructive post is to fix the quotations in
542:
501:
581:
119:
I found an article that I want to clean up (apply the logical quotes rule), and I can't currently do that.
64:
816:
823:
489:
76:
68:
869:
862:
846:
736:
to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at
188:
I'd finished disrupting "Okay". I also didn't realise I'd reverted the article more than three times.
38:
640:
470:
827:
837:
If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
812:
745:
733:
678:
650:
462:
409:
389:
363:
229:
168:
469:
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
634:
573:
559:
522:
442:
424:
393:
375:
29:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
619:
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding
430:
75:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
674:
320:
477:
838:
757:
741:
789:
717:
709:
701:
577:
725:
624:
405:
797:
793:
705:
694:
358:
224:
163:
576:
requesting that it be speedily deleted from
Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under
565:
638:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
536:
495:
357:
I for one would be glad to see all the d_mn'd quotations in
Knowledge (XXG) fixed. â
343:
340:
315:
270:
252:
193:
120:
106:
777:
398:
http://www.supercheats.com/nintendo64/walkthroughs/banjokazooie-walkthrough02.txt
753:
713:
381:
278:
260:
201:
128:
114:
266:
219:â for the disruption doesn't change the fact that you have nothing to show
79:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place
292:
605:
287:
876:
851:
767:
687:
659:
552:
511:
417:
368:
351:
325:
234:
173:
150:. Further, this abusive use of a sock-puppet itself followed just
740:. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see
72:
217:
the use of the puppet to shift the apparent center of opinion
883:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
861:
776:
644:
explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for
564:
480:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
429:
380:
309:
promise to behave, user requests to be banned if misbehaves
265:
There's more! Someone has explained the situation to me at
800:
which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still
457:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
720:). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "
673:
that you owned the copyright. I would suggest talking to
449:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
240:
While you were typing that, I changed something above.
216:
155:
143:
139:
392:. I have performed a web search with the contents of
807:
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not
830:, and the general policy for the trial can be found
608:, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at
144:
attempted to distort the apparent center of opinion
396:, and it appears to include a substantial copy of
531:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Mumbo Token
796:, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a
578:section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion
580:, because the article appears to be a blatant
148:previous anonymous edits from IP #90.205.80.22
134:Your disruptive behavior continued until mere
635:the page that has been nominated for deletion
8:
868:Hello, Avengah. You have new messages at
784:Hello. Your account has been granted the "
59:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
704:to inform you that the page you created,
700:Hello Avengah, this is a message from an
610:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
215:of ignorance â which simply won't cover
441:template has been added to the article
83:before the question. Again, welcome!
7:
822:For the guideline on reviewing, see
612:for more details, or ask a question
34:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
677:, the admin who deleted the page.
388:This is an automated message from
207:And should it be taken that it is
25:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for
14:
732:" to the page text, and edit the
455:Knowledge (XXG)'s deletion policy
146:by the use of this account after
802:being discussed by the community
291:
101:My other contributions are here:
606:GNU Free Documentation License
525:, an article you created, for
138:before you were blocked, when
1:
788:" userright, allowing you to
517:AfD nomination of Mumbo Token
488:, where it may be deleted if
306:for the following reason(s):
877:00:34, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
335:Thank you for unblocking me!
300:Your request to be unblocked
49:How to write a great article
451:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
898:
852:11:28, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
813:a small number of articles
792:on certain flagged pages.
768:05:20, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
406:the maintainer's talk page
290:
848:Penny for your thoughts?
824:Knowledge (XXG):Reviewing
790:review other users' edits
589:, but not as a source of
572:A tag has been placed on
539:of receiving this notice?
498:of receiving this notice?
478:proposed deletion process
369:04:04, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
352:03:56, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
326:03:51, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
279:03:50, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
261:03:44, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
235:03:39, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
202:03:40, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
174:03:23, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
160:claimed to have reformed.
129:02:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
115:02:39, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
77:Knowledge (XXG):Questions
817:Special:OldReviewedPages
738:User talk:SDPatrolBot II
688:15:40, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
595:say it in your own words
593:. This part is crucial:
482:speedy deletion criteria
347:
274:
256:
197:
124:
110:
870:Davejohnsan's talk page
660:21:56, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
553:21:44, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
512:20:12, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
492:to delete is reached.
418:12:33, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
866:
781:
708:, has been marked for
569:
447:criteria for inclusion
434:
385:
86:
865:
780:
568:
486:Articles for Deletion
484:or it can be sent to
433:
423:Proposed deletion of
384:
602:on the external site
21:Hello, Avengah, and
773:Reviewer permission
693:Speedy deletion of
669:There was still no
558:Speedy deletion of
313:Request handled by:
140:you violated WP:3RR
881:remove this notice
867:
782:
570:
435:
386:
284:Please unblock me!
44:How to edit a page
27:your contributions
685:
675:User:Ohnoitsjamie
657:
544:Insanity Incarnat
540:
521:I have nominated
503:Insanity Incarnat
499:
439:proposed deletion
332:
331:
324:
67:your messages on
889:
884:
849:
843:
787:
742:User talk:GB fan
731:
730:
724:
683:
681:
680:Ten Pound Hammer
655:
653:
652:Ten Pound Hammer
630:
629:
623:
550:
545:
534:
509:
504:
493:
468:
467:
461:
366:
318:
295:
288:
232:
171:
87:Look, I'm sorry!
82:
69:discussion pages
897:
896:
892:
891:
890:
888:
887:
886:
885:
874:
859:
847:
839:
798:two-month trial
794:Pending changes
785:
775:
752:) on behalf of
728:
722:
721:
710:speedy deletion
698:
679:
667:
651:
627:
621:
620:
563:
548:
543:
535:Do you want to
519:
507:
502:
494:Do you want to
465:
459:
458:
428:
379:
367:
362:
337:
286:
233:
228:
172:
167:
89:
80:
54:Manual of Style
12:
11:
5:
895:
893:
875:Message added
873:
860:
858:
855:
774:
771:
746:SDPatrolBot II
706:Normal English
697:
695:Normal English
691:
684:and his otters
666:
663:
656:and his otters
562:
556:
518:
515:
427:
421:
410:CorenSearchBot
390:CorenSearchBot
378:
373:
372:
371:
361:
336:
333:
330:
329:
308:
307:
296:
285:
282:
238:
237:
227:
177:
176:
166:
88:
85:
57:
56:
51:
46:
41:
36:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
894:
882:
878:
871:
864:
856:
854:
853:
850:
844:
842:
835:
833:
829:
825:
820:
818:
814:
810:
809:autoconfirmed
805:
803:
799:
795:
791:
779:
772:
770:
769:
765:
762:
759:
755:
751:
747:
743:
739:
735:
727:
719:
715:
711:
707:
703:
702:automated bot
696:
692:
690:
689:
682:
676:
672:
664:
662:
661:
654:
647:
643:
642:
641:the talk page
637:
636:
626:
617:
615:
611:
607:
603:
598:
596:
592:
588:
583:
579:
575:
567:
561:
557:
555:
554:
551:
546:
538:
532:
528:
524:
516:
514:
513:
510:
505:
497:
491:
487:
483:
479:
474:
472:
471:its talk page
464:
456:
452:
448:
444:
440:
432:
426:
422:
420:
419:
415:
411:
407:
401:
399:
395:
391:
383:
377:
374:
370:
365:
360:
356:
355:
354:
353:
349:
345:
342:
334:
328:
327:
322:
317:
314:
310:
305:
301:
297:
294:
289:
283:
281:
280:
276:
272:
268:
263:
262:
258:
254:
249:
245:
241:
236:
231:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
205:
204:
203:
199:
195:
189:
185:
181:
175:
170:
165:
161:
159:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
132:
131:
130:
126:
122:
117:
116:
112:
108:
104:
102:
99:
96:
93:
84:
78:
74:
70:
66:
62:
55:
52:
50:
47:
45:
42:
40:
37:
35:
32:
31:
30:
28:
24:
19:
18:
840:
836:
821:
806:
783:
760:
744:. Thanks, -
699:
670:
668:
645:
639:
632:
618:
601:
599:
594:
590:
586:
571:
520:
475:
436:
402:
387:
341:Murder, Inc.
338:
312:
311:
303:
299:
298:
264:
250:
246:
242:
239:
220:
212:
208:
190:
186:
182:
178:
157:
151:
135:
118:
105:
100:
97:
94:
90:
58:
20:
16:
15:
841:HJÂ Mitchell
714:User:GB fan
665:Mumbo Token
633:the top of
587:information
574:Mumbo Token
560:Mumbo Token
523:Mumbo Token
443:Mumbo Token
425:Mumbo Token
394:Mumbo Token
376:Mumbo Token
71:using four
879:. You can
463:dated prod
158:previously
81:{{helpme}}
61:Wikipedian
734:talk page
591:sentences
582:copyright
490:consensus
359:SlamDiego
302:has been
267:Talk:Okay
225:SlamDiego
164:SlamDiego
63:! Please
857:Talkback
786:reviewer
764:contribs
527:deletion
248:I said.
39:Tutorial
17:Welcome!
537:opt out
496:opt out
344:Avengah
316:Toddst1
304:granted
271:Avengah
253:Avengah
194:Avengah
152:minutes
136:minutes
121:Avengah
107:Avengah
23:welcome
754:GBÂ fan
726:hangon
646:speedy
625:hangon
453:" and
213:excuse
154:after
73:tildes
671:proof
832:here
828:here
758:talk
750:talk
614:here
414:talk
348:talk
321:talk
275:talk
257:talk
209:also
198:talk
156:you
142:and
125:talk
111:talk
65:sign
718:CSD
712:by
686:â˘
658:â˘
631:to
616:.
221:but
845:|
834:.
819:.
766:)
729:}}
723:{{
628:}}
622:{{
597:.
541:â
500:â
473:.
466:}}
460:{{
437:A
416:)
408:.
364:âT
350:)
277:)
259:)
230:âT
200:)
169:âT
127:)
113:)
103:]
872:.
761:¡
756:(
748:(
549:e
508:e
412:(
346:(
323:)
319:(
273:(
255:(
196:(
162:â
123:(
109:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.