1377:(without page numbering). I could multiply this disattention, or insouciance to quality sources, or lack of awareness of what focused sourcing requires, thousands of times. In so many futile edit conflicts, many simply do not appear to understand that everything that they might wish to represent, on either side, can be got from academic books printed by University presses. If you used, as a sophomore, Hirsch and co, not area specialists, to footnote such a self-evident statement, your supervisor would rap you over the knuckles (in the old days) and give you a three minute lecture on the proper methodology of how to source what. The wiki guidelines are overpowering on etiquette etc., but these elementary principles, though regarded as optimal, do not seem to be understood even by experienced editors, who are too prepossessed with every formal requirement save the requirement to write according to the best formal sources available. Sorry for this longueur. But I really do think a page on simple compositional rules, making a hierarchy for what is a reliable source, would help avoid a huge amount of effort wasted in the politics of squabbling over POVs. Cheers
1524:. Let me preface this by saying that when you write something I am going to pay attention and try and heed any advice you pass along, because as far as I can tell you are one of the few editors on this project that commands the respect of both 'sides' in that area of contentious editing. But, as you said everybody in that thread carries some guilt, I would be interested in knowing what it is that you think I should be correcting in my behavior. It was my feeling that the user which that thread was focused on followed Tiamut just to annoy her in a pretty easily recognizable case of hounding, something for which that user had been warned for in the past. If I did something wrong in bringing this up please let me know, but I felt that was in keeping with
1360:
without setting off a vast and delicately calibrated series of resonances through the commentaries of later ages. These two are so complex that, in the end, one does well to use secondary sources. One cannot strictly speaking use the Talmud or the commentaries to write any article because of the technical reasons I gave above. In the Susya article before example, David Amit's essay makes it quite clear that tensions between distinct halakhic rulings in the Talmud exist between the
Berakot and Bara Batra tractates (as is so often the case, hence the commentaries), and if one uses primary sources, then the dangers of partial synthesis or selective emphasis are huge.
1154:(c)They are too inflected with a unifying, corporative drift, and systematically underplay, when they do not indeed elide, the rich diversity of opinion within rabbinical commentary. This is one of the unfortunate reflexes of the strong drive to make Israel into a uniform, homogeneous state: since Judaism is a feature of that state, its interpretation has tended to accentuate what unites, rather than record the variety of distinct and often conflicting traditions in the communities of historic Judaism.
1641:
31:
1888:
1764:
1151:(though you will never find me raising that issue, and you can be assured I would revert or challenge any editor who tried to challenge these sketches on those grounds. As I often say, I don't think the rules are there for anything other than to assist those who don't know what is required to draft, collegially, encyclopedic articles.)
1140:(a) many of them are stubs begging for elaboration. Compared to the intensity of focus shown on political articles by Israeli and Jewish editors (and of course their 'pro-Palestinian colleagues, but they often know little of Judaism), they evoke little passionate enquiry or dedicated editing. I think this unfortunate.
1969:) was unrelated, and that you had unblocked him. However, he is still blocked for email abuse. I was wondering if Suit was completely innocent of his block reason, and whether he should be unblocked, or whether he should remain blocked for the reason stated in his block log. Just for clarification. Thanks. :)
1135:
Just to reply here, which is more appropriate. I've never thought of articles on
Judaism as part of the I/P area, so my suggestion wouldn't affect them. It is true that we have huge academic sources for the I/P area, whereas, if one compares secondary academic sources on Judaism to the sheer quantity
1359:
You can find quite a substantial academic literature now on the most refined points of distinction and controversy, and it would be good if some systematic work were undertaken to begin to wikify these numerous pages. Talmudic citation is parlous enough, since no section of the Talmud can be touched
713:
I saw Rlevse's log entry promoting you on my watchlist and figured if I was really fast I could get my congratulations in ahead of everyone else. (Rlevse, what I do is open several browser windows so I can promote the person and post a talk page message at almost exactly the same time, so that other
1543:
Not sure if you meant half-baked in the way that I would normally use it, but I'll keep your words in mind. I do agree that there are issues with users on 'both sides'; there are users on 'my side' of things that I think are terrible editors and I honestly wouldn't mind seeing them leave, and there
1287:
1:4). As
Solomon Freehof has pointed out, that rule was intended to apply to contemporary courts, but ‘Orthodoxy in recent centuries preferred, in its nervousness, to take the dictum to mean something that it was never intended to mean, namely, that no court of any generation can ever change the
1079:. Please participate in that discussion if you have any interest, and if you still have interest in achieving the goals of the original project, we'd love to have you join in. If you aren't interested in either the conversation or the project, please pardon the interruption. :) Thanks.
522:
and it said "Expired", so I flipped the crat switch, then I saw the ending time was a few hours away yet. Why there was this discrepancy, I don't know, but I decided to go ahead and finish the job of closing it rather than leave it half done. It's a clear promote at 96% anyway,
901:
First, congratulations and welcome back, hope you had an enjoyable holiday. I have a question that I hope you can answer; is there any way to have in the en.wiki watchlist pages from commons? It is a bit of an annoyance going back and forth just to check on things. Thanks,
1136:
of primary sources, commentaries on the Talmud, the specialist secondary literature might not often cope adequately with the niceties and complexities of Judaic tradition. As a general rule, in the latter, however, I still think the articles on
Judaism poorly done by.
1618:
1208:, scholars in one era within the history of halachic development do not challenge the rulings of previous-era scholars, and hence Acharonim cannot dispute the rulings of rabbis of previous eras unless they find support from other rabbis of previous eras.'
1488:
365:
I'll add good wishes, as well. You might also want to know that, as you're using the word in your nom, you want "community's", not "communities." I'd change it myself, but some people might take it the wrong way or have a problem with that.
1406:
1004:
Thanks for the quick reply. The old name has retired on it, and I assume that no one else could have taken it, although I have been known -- on occasion -- to make wrong assumptions. I will go ahead and make the request. Thanks again.
1349:
I hear a man of
Sephardic background, whose learning was enriched through cross-congregational dialogue, writing with a scientific and quite individually nuanced mind, in this judgement which is brief, yet nicely phrased to allow for
984:
I want find out if I can return to my former user name, or if it will be necessary to create a new user name. It is not clear to me of this is possible to return to the old one; and if it is possible, if that can be done on
1025:
Some edits just scream "revert me now". I never knew I could be bored after two sentences. Seriously, I hesitate when messing with others' talk pages. I didn't think you'd want that displayed, though. See ya 'round.
698:
Dammit!! I always miss these things, am as slow as a wet week on the wiki uptake and my recent bad temper's no excuse either. Whatever it was you got nominated for, you fully deserve it. Full steam ahead, Avi, and best
1060:
1288:
opinion of any other court, in whatever generation it lived, unless this modern court that wants to change the law can claim to be greater in number and wisdom than the predecessor’.’ John D.Tayner,
1180:(c.2) There is a visible bias in those articles on the law, at least to a raw but fascinated outsider like me, towards orthodox, as the central doctrinal body, and other schools, like Reform Judaism.
1952:
1598:
All this aside, please do not punish them for my issues. These types of "mistrials" are only damaging the
Knowledge (XXG) community. If you wish to learn about my story, I'll answer any question.
1263:‘the Halakhah has always been inhibited by its interpreters’ veneration for their predecessors. The Amoraim deferred to the Tannaim, the Geonim (heads of the Babylonian academies= to the
1920:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any
1737:
1548:
for a bit and will not be even thinking about this place while I am there, so maybe that will give me an opportunity to relax and help me work on
WorkingWithEachOther. See you around,
1916:
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
402:
1075:. Since you're on the rosters of membership in at least one of those projects, I thought you might be interested. Conversation about redirecting those projects is located
1596:) are each other's sockpuppets. Take a look at Smedpull's talk page and after that revise the sockpuppet policy. Chingadiculous serves as their new account, which is fine.
1072:
1909:
if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on
Knowledge (XXG) (see
1905:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
1373:, while remarking that the West Bank is partially under Israeli administration, sources this universally documented commonplace to a book like Hirsch's (et al.)
1076:
714:
people can't get in ahead of me like that. :-) That was great, Avi, getting people to switch to support with your Q12. Are you still able to edit abuse filters?
1854:
I know you've dealt with this user in the past, so I'll be straight - I'm a former meatpuppet of his who he recruited a few years back. The user was a bit like
1654:
1279:(later authorities) to the Rishonim. And the Acharonim of recent times have been the most timid of all . .In particular, they have been inclined to invoke the
2054:
Your view on circumcision seems to be rather biased. Please try to stay as neutral as possible in the debate. Why do try to suppress reliable information?
1157:(c.1) The rifts between Ashkenazi and Sephardic cultures, even in things like halakhic rulings (which reflects indeed the ancient differences going back to
647:
Congratulations. I wanted to close it so bad...but Rlevse beat me to the punch. I told you third time's the charm on my RFB, and it looks like I was right.
1410:
964:. I was trying to move it as well, but did the rename first. Apologies for cutting you off. Either way, I'm off now, so they're all yours. ;-) Best, —
1925:
1068:
1917:
1112:
accounts too to avoid possible confusion? I have an account aum-en here on en.wiki as you can see. Can it be connected to AUM somehow? Thanks.
2031:
may believe the BMA is contradicting itself, but you have not adequately demonstrated that, and thus your reversion seems based on (at least)
1064:
1740:
which passed today at 8/0/0 unanimously. I will endeavor to justify the trust the WP community has placed in me....Have a nice day. :-) --
1593:
660:
1052:
1473:
2061:
1448:
1425:
1599:
1902:
1948:
1056:
621:
633:
You very much deserve the strong support you got. Good luck with the new duties, and thanks for volunteering to take them on!
1579:
1469:
446:
1867:
I'm really sorry for this, and for any upset that he caused you, or any
Checkuser/sysop/Wikimedian. But I live and learn. --
986:
1860:]. I'm not sure if this applies to meatpuppets though. Anyway, should point out that not every user suspected of being him
1487:
I am surprised at some of the comments you have been making on the West Bank
Workshop, and have initiated a discussion on
972:
793:
1910:
731:(Although, come to think of it, maybe that technique isn't all that much use on projects with more than one bureaucrat.)
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
77:
63:
127:
123:
119:
115:
111:
107:
103:
99:
95:
1897:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a
1336:
The Aryeh Kaplan Reader: The Gift He Left Behind: Collected Essays on Jewish Themes from the Noted Writer and Thinker
1829:
1966:
1283:
principles . . .that one court may not rescind the decision of another unless it is superior in wisdom and number (
450:
38:
401:
Do you think I should create a separate case for the first account created in the third set of confirmed socks on
1409:. I'm not sure whether you can restore an essay that was in somebody's userspace, but if you can, could you move
1217:
Yes but 'Orthodox' here only begs the question, as does the citation of Menachem Elon on one aspect of the issue.
405:, or are they from one of the above sets (James Tucton or 767-249ER)? Your statement appears it could be either.
1587:
1173:
schools), is substantially ignored. There were substantial differences between the two on issues like monogamy/
1010:
994:
966:
787:
655:
1893:
1369:
In general the I/P articles don't take much interest in quality sources (I noted last night that the lead of
2065:
2035:. Also please explain the reversion of the other changes, which you did not address in your edit summary.
1603:
1442:
1419:
1051:
Hi. This little form letter is just a courtesy notice to let you know that a proposal to merge the projects
860:
454:
2057:
1858:
except he did use talk pages. I'm just being open and honest here. I've decided to make a fresh start, per
1980:
1528:. But please do let me know if you see error in my ways and I will attempt to correct any issues. Thanks,
1006:
990:
499:
1825:
1748:
1669:
1647:
1640:
1437:
1414:
946:
638:
356:
519:
1544:
are certainly users from the 'other side' that I have considerable respect for. Whatever, I am going
1034:
739:
722:
564:
476:
1997:
confirmed and the name only quoted from an email, and from the contributions it's also obvious that
1226:
The academic literature, to give only a very small sampling, would supply things like the following:
1108:. Is it possible to get (usurp) these apparently inactive accounts? What do you think about getting
2040:
1810:
1788:
1583:
1382:
1090:
1080:
820:
704:
650:
619:
550:
387:
431:
I viewed the answer to Q12 as tl;dr at first, but after you asked me, I read it over and moved to
2008:
1573:
1553:
1533:
1370:
922:
907:
848:
510:
442:
1148:
1104:
Hi, I am AUM from cz.wiki. I would like to make unified account as AUM, but I have found this:
1971:
1872:
680:
492:
413:
51:
17:
1906:
579:
1741:
1717:
1700:
1662:
1525:
1465:
1121:
942:
775:
634:
593:
535:
352:
1933:
1622:
1195:
underline the point I wished to make. In the Acharonim article you direct me to, we read:-
1027:
941:
me back to you, so I figured I'd inquire as to how things were progressing. Best regards,
803:
735:
718:
559:
472:
2032:
1898:
1413:
to my userspace? It was a very helpful essay, and I'm sorry to see it deleted. Thanks, —
1144:
2036:
1960:
1855:
1806:
1784:
1378:
1319:
816:
700:
610:
383:
351:
I'm glad to see your RfB. I have registered my support and wish you the best of luck!
1839:
1569:
1549:
1529:
918:
903:
871:
518:
Avi, I didn't mean to close your RFB early, I saw the pink background on your RFB at
507:
437:
367:
2005:. Since the account is somewhat active here I didn't want this to wait for too long.
2069:
2044:
2013:
1987:
1937:
1876:
1868:
1844:
1814:
1792:
1756:
1721:
1707:
1677:
1629:
1607:
1557:
1537:
1509:
1497:
1477:
1453:
1430:
1407:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles
1386:
1331:
1162:
1125:
1093:
1083:
1041:
1014:
998:
974:
950:
926:
911:
888:
874:
865:
838:
834:
824:
810:
795:
779:
765:
743:
726:
708:
684:
676:
667:
642:
626:
600:
569:
553:
542:
513:
501:
480:
458:
418:
407:
391:
372:
360:
334:-
43:
2024:
Please explain how in your view, the BMA's quoted statement "contradicts the BMA."
1887:
1824:
It has been customary for a while (at least I think) to use account names such as
1105:
1713:
1691:
1505:
1493:
1303:
This secondary academic source sounds to my unwashed ears like a Reform reading.
1117:
884:
771:
584:
526:
50:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1322:, and therefore, later authorities could not counter them. While the Acharonim
1929:
917:
Thanks, it does indeed look promising (but soooo slow). Enjoy your time away,
770:
Congratulations! I have no doubt you will wear the bureaucratic mantle well.
762:
1998:
1994:
1956:
1276:
1192:
1170:
832:
You were on RFB? Woah. I should've supported you; if I knew, I would've! :)
2002:
938:
1835:
1268:
1188:
1174:
1326:
between the opinions found among the Rishonim, they do not dispute them
937:
My various attempts at resolving the issue we previously discussed keep
1264:
1763:
1177:, but if you read the latter wiki article, you would never believe it.
785:
I'd like to extend my congratulations too, Avi. Welcome to the team. —
1284:
1280:
1272:
1166:
881:
1061:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Moving free images to Wikimedia Commons
1545:
1953:
Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/JarlaxleArtemis/Archive
1158:
25:
1568:
I find it rather funny that you've positively concluded that
1657:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
1639:
1113:
2025:
1780:
1521:
1252:
That is very Orthodox, conservative and peremptory, but
961:
506:
Congrats, and thanks for volunteering to do more work.
403:
Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/James Tucton
1993:I've unblocked him. The mix-up seems probable with
1241:, tr. Ravi Shachar, Feldheim Publishers, 2002 p.352
1237:'Acharonim don’t contradict rishonim.' Danon Danin,
1073:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Council/Proposals/Files
1924:will be deleted after seven days, as described on
879:Vive la bureaucratie! Félicitations, mon ami! --
1882:Orphaned non-free media (File:Stuart Adamson.jpg)
1732:
1290:Jewish Religious Law: a progressive perspective,
1106:http://toolserver.org/~vvv/sulutil.php?user=AUM
870:Well done; use your new tools carefully. Best,
1949:Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/Sui
435:. Best of luck on the remainder of your RfB,
8:
1069:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Images and Media
804:
382:I needed that. Thanks mate, best as always
1646:Hello, Avraham. You have new messages at
1411:User:Videmus Omnia/Requesting free content
1712:me too, I'm sure you'll do a good job --
1065:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Illustration
1053:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Free images
1832:, it will only confuse people. — Carl
48:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1828:. If you start a new system, such as
1736:I sincerely thank you for closing my
1314:‘The opinions of the Rishonim gained
7:
1864:him, as he did recruit meatpuppets.
1057:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Fair use
675:Well done, use your new tools well!
1805:so much for the great news! Wow! --
1375:New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy
989:. Your advice will be appreciated.
1688:Congrats on your first +sysop Avi!
1617:Hi Avi, I'd welcome your views on
1338:, Mesorah Publications, 1983 p.213
847:I'm glad that you're a 'crat now.
24:
1318:universal acceptance through the
1187:The two examples you provided of
1161:, and to the later rifts between
1886:
1762:
1071:has met with general support at
486:Nicely done, Avraham. Congrats!
29:
854:
850:
1830:User:Inactive user account 001
1405:I saw that you're a member of
1:
1951:(later moved and merged with
1911:our policy for non-free media
1402:I hope all is well with you.
1395:Restoring a deleted "article"
1271:(earlier authorities) to the
428:Hi Avi, pleased to meet you.
1926:criteria for speedy deletion
1169:authorities, the Geonim and
94:
2050:Biased view on Circumcision
1901:. However, it is currently
1798:my RfA closing notification
2086:
1538:22:07, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
1510:09:21, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
1498:07:51, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
1478:18:33, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
1454:01:44, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
1431:19:39, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
1387:13:11, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
1328:without overwhelming proof
1126:11:07, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
1094:16:45, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
1084:16:45, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
1042:04:09, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
1015:19:09, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
999:18:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
975:15:14, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
951:21:27, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
927:18:20, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
912:17:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
889:17:55, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
875:17:05, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
802:Yes Congratulations :-) --
744:21:51, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
1760:
1738:BAG membership nomination
1735:
1292:Berghahn Books, 1998 p.38
1206:Orthodox Jewish tradition
866:11:50, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
839:02:16, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
825:00:37, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
811:23:37, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
796:22:46, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
780:22:23, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
766:22:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
727:21:54, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
709:21:41, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
685:21:39, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
668:21:01, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
643:20:45, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
627:20:32, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
601:20:32, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
570:20:29, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
554:20:27, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
543:20:23, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
514:20:20, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
502:20:16, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
481:20:12, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
459:00:40, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
419:15:19, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
392:22:08, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
373:13:54, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
361:00:48, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
42:of past discussions with
2070:00:00, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
2045:22:11, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
2014:22:40, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
1988:21:41, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
1943:Minor case clarification
1938:05:41, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
1877:21:31, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
1845:03:32, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
1815:21:12, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
1793:18:21, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
1757:09:49, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
1722:12:44, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
1708:00:18, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
1678:00:07, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
558:Yeah, you earned it. --
1894:File:Stuart Adamson.jpg
1648:Tinucherian's talk page
1630:03:26, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
1608:08:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
1558:03:25, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
89:
76:
69:
62:
2020:Inexplicable reversion
1955:), you mentioned that
1644:
1340:
1294:
1243:
1067:into the newly formed
1891:Thanks for uploading
1643:
1312:
1261:
1235:
1143:(b) too many violate
1621:, if you have time.
1503:I've replied there.
1436:Thanks a million. —
987:WP:Changing username
578:Now add yourself to
1907:You may add it back
1826:User:Renamed user 2
1466:m:User talk:Avraham
1371:Israeli Settlements
1089:P.S. Hi, Avi! :D --
968:Anonymous Dissident
789:Anonymous Dissident
468:Congratulations!!!!
464:Congratulations!!!!
1772:
1767:
1655:remove this notice
1645:
1520:Hi Avi, regarding
1131:Rishonim/Acharonim
971:
933:Request for update
895:watchlist question
792:
497:
2060:comment added by
2033:original research
1899:claim of fair use
1843:
1771:
1770:
1761:
1731:
1635:Re:BAG nomination
1628:
1047:New image project
965:
864:
786:
761:Congratulations!
683:
491:
341:
340:
85:
84:
58:
57:
52:current talk page
18:User talk:Avraham
2077:
2072:
2011:
1986:
1983:
1974:
1918:my contributions
1890:
1833:
1766:
1733:
1706:
1703:
1658:
1627:
1625:
1508:
1496:
1452:
1429:
1038:
1031:
980:user name change
969:
858:
856:
852:
808:
790:
734:
717:
679:
663:
658:
653:
617:
599:
596:
567:
562:
541:
538:
495:
489:
471:
416:
410:
370:
337:
87:
86:
80:
79:Archive 41 : -->
74:
66:
60:
59:
33:
32:
26:
2085:
2084:
2080:
2079:
2078:
2076:
2075:
2074:
2055:
2052:
2022:
2009:
1981:
1972:
1970:
1945:
1884:
1852:
1822:
1800:
1777:
1730:
1701:
1689:
1685:
1659:
1652:
1637:
1623:
1619:this suggestion
1615:
1566:
1526:DefendEachOther
1518:
1506:John Vandenberg
1504:
1494:John Vandenberg
1492:
1485:
1462:
1440:
1417:
1397:
1133:
1102:
1049:
1036:
1029:
1023:
1007:Malcolm Schosha
991:Malcolm Schosha
982:
967:
958:
935:
897:
788:
732:
715:
677:Camaron | Chris
661:
656:
651:
624:
611:
594:
582:
565:
560:
536:
524:
493:
487:
469:
466:
426:
414:
408:
399:
380:
368:
349:
336:... (up to 100)
335:
78:
70:
65:< Archive 39
64:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2083:
2081:
2051:
2048:
2021:
2018:
2017:
2016:
2006:
1944:
1941:
1883:
1880:
1856:User:MascotGuy
1851:
1848:
1821:
1820:Renaming users
1818:
1799:
1796:
1776:
1773:
1769:
1768:
1759:
1752:
1745:
1729:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1710:
1684:
1681:
1673:
1666:
1651:
1638:
1636:
1633:
1614:
1611:
1597:
1584:Chingadiculous
1565:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1517:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1484:
1481:
1461:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1396:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1320:Shulkhan Aruch
1307:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1239:Shaʻare emunah
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1204:'According to
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1182:
1181:
1178:
1155:
1152:
1141:
1132:
1129:
1101:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1091:Moonriddengirl
1081:Moonriddengirl
1048:
1045:
1022:
1019:
1018:
1017:
981:
978:
957:
954:
934:
931:
930:
929:
900:
896:
893:
892:
891:
877:
868:
830:
829:
828:
827:
799:
798:
759:
758:
757:
756:
755:
754:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
747:
746:
673:
672:
671:
670:
630:
629:
622:
606:
605:
604:
603:
573:
572:
556:
551:Moonriddengirl
547:
546:
545:
504:
465:
462:
425:
422:
398:
395:
379:
376:
348:
345:
343:
339:
338:
93:
83:
82:
75:
68:
56:
55:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2082:
2073:
2071:
2067:
2063:
2062:85.176.109.57
2059:
2049:
2047:
2046:
2042:
2038:
2034:
2030:
2026:
2019:
2015:
2012:
2004:
2000:
1996:
1992:
1991:
1990:
1989:
1984:
1978:
1977:
1968:
1965:
1962:
1958:
1954:
1950:
1942:
1940:
1939:
1935:
1931:
1928:. Thank you.
1927:
1923:
1919:
1914:
1912:
1908:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1895:
1889:
1881:
1879:
1878:
1874:
1870:
1865:
1863:
1859:
1857:
1849:
1847:
1846:
1841:
1837:
1831:
1827:
1819:
1817:
1816:
1812:
1808:
1804:
1797:
1795:
1794:
1790:
1786:
1782:
1781:watching over
1774:
1765:
1758:
1754:
1753:
1750:
1747:
1746:
1743:
1739:
1734:
1727:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1709:
1704:
1698:
1697:
1695:
1687:
1686:
1683:Broken cherry
1682:
1680:
1679:
1675:
1674:
1671:
1668:
1667:
1664:
1656:
1649:
1642:
1634:
1632:
1631:
1626:
1620:
1612:
1610:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1595:
1592:
1589:
1585:
1581:
1578:
1575:
1571:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1551:
1547:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1515:
1511:
1507:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1495:
1490:
1489:the talk page
1482:
1480:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1459:
1455:
1450:
1447:
1444:
1439:
1438:Malik Shabazz
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1427:
1424:
1421:
1416:
1415:Malik Shabazz
1412:
1408:
1403:
1400:
1394:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1350:complexities.
1348:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1339:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1293:
1291:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1242:
1240:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1207:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1179:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1153:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1130:
1128:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1099:
1095:
1092:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1046:
1044:
1043:
1040:
1039:
1033:
1032:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
996:
992:
988:
979:
977:
976:
973:
970:
963:
955:
953:
952:
948:
944:
940:
932:
928:
924:
920:
916:
915:
914:
913:
909:
905:
894:
890:
887:
886:
883:
878:
876:
873:
869:
867:
862:
857:
853:
846:
845:Snow congrats
843:
842:
841:
840:
837:
836:
826:
822:
818:
814:
813:
812:
809:
807:
801:
800:
797:
794:
791:
784:
783:
782:
781:
777:
773:
768:
767:
764:
745:
741:
737:
730:
729:
728:
724:
720:
712:
711:
710:
706:
702:
697:
696:
695:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
689:
688:
687:
686:
682:
678:
669:
666:
665:
664:
659:
654:
646:
645:
644:
640:
636:
632:
631:
628:
625:
620:
618:
615:
608:
607:
602:
597:
591:
590:
588:
581:
577:
576:
575:
574:
571:
568:
563:
557:
555:
552:
548:
544:
539:
533:
532:
530:
521:
517:
516:
515:
512:
509:
505:
503:
500:
496:
485:
484:
483:
482:
478:
474:
463:
461:
460:
456:
452:
448:
444:
440:
439:
434:
429:
423:
421:
420:
417:
412:
411:
404:
396:
394:
393:
389:
385:
377:
375:
374:
371:
363:
362:
358:
354:
346:
344:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
92:
88:
81:
73:
67:
61:
53:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
2053:
2028:
2023:
2003:de:User:Suit
1999:en:User:Suit
1975:
1963:
1946:
1921:
1915:
1892:
1885:
1866:
1861:
1853:
1823:
1802:
1801:
1778:
1749:
1742:
1693:
1692:
1670:
1663:
1660:
1616:
1613:I/P articles
1600:87.69.57.241
1590:
1576:
1567:
1564:Sockpuppets?
1519:
1516:ani question
1486:
1463:
1445:
1422:
1404:
1401:
1398:
1374:
1335:
1332:Aryeh Kaplan
1327:
1323:
1315:
1313:
1289:
1262:
1238:
1236:
1205:
1163:Eretz Israel
1134:
1109:
1103:
1050:
1035:
1028:
1024:
983:
960:Sorry about
959:
936:
898:
880:
849:
844:
833:
831:
805:
769:
760:
674:
652:bibliomaniac
649:
648:
613:
609:Congrats :D
586:
585:
549:Ditto. :) --
528:
527:
494:Juliancolton
467:
436:
432:
430:
427:
424:Re to e-mail
406:
400:
381:
364:
350:
347:Best wishes!
342:
251:
90:
71:
47:
37:
2056:—Preceding
1947:Hi Avi. On
943:Xenophrenic
899:Hi Avraham,
815:Congrats!!
635:John Carter
353:Majoreditor
36:This is an
1728:Thank you!
1624:SlimVirgin
1468:. thanks,
1324:may decide
1275:, and the
806:Mardetanha
736:Coppertwig
719:Coppertwig
473:Coppertwig
378:Nice touch
91:All Pages:
72:Archive 40
2037:Blackworm
2027:It seems
1995:User:SUIT
1807:Rosiestep
1803:Thank you
1785:Blackworm
1775:Thank you
1483:the email
1379:Nishidani
1277:Acharonim
1193:Acharonim
1171:Ashkenazi
817:America69
701:Nishidani
523:Congrats!
384:Nishidani
2058:unsigned
2010:Amalthea
2007:Cheers,
1967:contribs
1922:articles
1903:orphaned
1751:Cherian
1672:Cherian
1653:You can
1594:contribs
1580:contribs
1570:Smedpull
1550:Nableezy
1530:Nableezy
1470:Daniel B
1449:contribs
1426:contribs
1399:Hi Avi,
1281:Mishnaic
1269:Rishonim
1189:Rishonim
1175:polygamy
1149:WP:SYNTH
939:bouncing
919:Nableezy
904:Nableezy
855:american
508:FloNight
397:Question
369:IronDuke
1976:Symonds
1869:Gulsig4
1850:Sunholm
1265:Amoraim
835:Sceptre
699:wishes.
616:delanoy
580:WP:CRAT
433:support
44:Avraham
39:archive
1714:NSH001
1582:) and
1316:almost
1285:Eduyot
1273:Geonim
1267:, the
1167:Geonim
1118:Aum.en
772:Risker
763:Jayjg
681:(talk)
520:WT:RFA
1973:Peter
1930:BJBot
1783:me.
1696:levse
1145:WP:OR
1037:rolls
851:young
589:levse
566:fisto
561:Menti
531:levse
438:Dylan
16:<
2066:talk
2041:talk
1982:talk
1961:talk
1957:Suit
1934:talk
1873:talk
1840:talk
1811:talk
1789:talk
1779:For
1744:Tinu
1718:talk
1702:Talk
1665:Tinu
1604:talk
1588:talk
1574:talk
1554:talk
1546:home
1534:talk
1522:this
1474:talk
1464:see
1460:שלום
1443:talk
1420:talk
1383:talk
1191:and
1165:and
1159:Ezra
1122:talk
1116:/ --
1077:here
1063:and
1030:Tide
1011:talk
995:talk
962:this
956:/SUL
947:talk
923:talk
908:talk
885:not?
861:wtf?
821:talk
776:talk
740:talk
723:talk
705:talk
639:talk
623:adds
595:Talk
537:Talk
477:talk
455:sign
451:ping
447:work
443:chat
415:ergy
388:talk
357:talk
330:-
326:-
322:-
318:-
314:-
310:-
306:-
302:-
298:-
294:-
290:-
286:-
282:-
278:-
274:-
270:-
266:-
262:-
258:-
254:-
250:-
246:-
242:-
238:-
234:-
230:-
226:-
222:-
218:-
214:-
210:-
206:-
202:-
198:-
194:-
190:-
186:-
182:-
178:-
174:-
170:-
166:-
162:-
158:-
154:-
150:-
146:-
142:-
138:-
134:-
130:-
126:-
122:-
118:-
114:-
110:-
106:-
102:-
98:-
2029:you
2001:==
1913:).
1836:CBM
1661:--
1330:.'
1147:or
1114:AUM
1110:aum
1100:SUL
1021:Yep
872:AGK
511:♥♥♥
409:Syn
2068:)
2043:)
1936:)
1875:)
1862:is
1838:·
1813:)
1791:)
1755:-
1720:)
1705:•
1699:•
1690:—
1676:-
1606:)
1556:)
1536:)
1491:.
1476:)
1385:)
1334:,
1124:)
1059:,
1055:,
1013:)
997:)
949:)
925:)
910:)
823:)
778:)
742:)
725:)
707:)
641:)
598:•
592:•
583:—
540:•
534:•
525:—
498:|
488::)
479:)
457:)
453:,
449:,
445:,
390:)
359:)
332:60
328:59
324:58
320:57
316:56
312:55
308:54
304:53
300:52
296:51
292:50
288:49
284:48
280:47
276:46
272:45
268:44
264:43
260:42
256:41
252:40
248:39
244:38
240:37
236:36
232:35
228:34
224:33
220:32
216:31
212:30
208:29
204:28
200:27
196:26
192:25
188:24
184:23
180:22
176:21
172:20
168:19
164:18
160:17
156:16
152:15
148:14
144:13
140:12
136:11
132:10
46:.
2064:(
2039:(
1985:)
1979:(
1964:·
1959:(
1932:(
1871:(
1842:)
1834:(
1809:(
1787:(
1716:(
1694:R
1650:.
1602:(
1591:·
1586:(
1577:·
1572:(
1552:(
1532:(
1472:(
1451:)
1446:·
1441:(
1428:)
1423:·
1418:(
1381:(
1120:(
1009:(
993:(
945:(
921:(
906:(
882:Y
863:)
859:(
819:(
774:(
738:(
733:☺
721:(
716:☺
703:(
662:5
657:1
637:(
614:.
612:J
587:R
529:R
490:–
475:(
470:☺
441:(
386:(
355:(
128:9
124:8
120:7
116:6
112:5
108:4
104:3
100:2
96:1
54:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.