166:
has long been discarded by scientists as a good indicator of homology. The fact that you still harp on it is very disconcerning. What the post was about was not the 1800s embryology about humans with gills, but rather the 21st century evolutionary developmental biology that investigates the genetic
115:
the point is that cannot be used as evidence casue it is a lie those flaps of skin in the human embroy become the ear canals glands, ur ears and simply are not gills if you want to say that they have gills. If you have other evidence that hasn't been proven wrong for embryology then you can use it
34:
I removed 150 years from Hunza people as there was no literary text for that. Otherwise it was a good attempt. Please keep up the good work. And here is the welcome note for you, since i noticed no one welcomed you here.
240:
when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). For further info, read
156:
Read the part about the "The
Biogenetic Law" saying that human don't have resperoray organs in those pharyngeal pouches that become glands in the neck and the ear canal.
162:
I will have no problem if you rewrite your comment as you have done on my talk page (and yours). It is polite and offers some kind of reasoning. The concept of
145:
What is wrong? All I said is that if you have info that wasn't proven wrong he could use it. I was just explaing that human embroyos don't have gill silts.
190:
I'm not a physicist, so I cannot give you a good answer for your questions. However, here are a couple of good links. Your concern is addressed in the
236:(~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then be automatically added along with a
217:
93:
53:
to
Knowledge! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
120:
I moved your comment to your userpage as it was both offensive and pointless. If you want to contribute do it politly and with reason.--
163:
241:
96:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
77:
256:
62:
50:
82:
276:
suggest that you seem to be treating
Knowledge as a forum. If you have specific questions, could you use the
57:
229:
167:
mechanism for large scale evolution (which is nicely observed in embryos). Keep up with the times ;).--
89:
203:
168:
121:
135:. People will be more likely to listen to you when they can easily understand what you have written
97:
36:
17:
20:, for example, which completely invalidates the point you made on the corresponding Talk page. --
16:
Welcome to
Knowledge. Please read articles before commenting on them. See the second paragraph of
285:
72:
199:
104:
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
246:
21:
225:
221:
151:
281:
67:
277:
273:
136:
116:
but the gill statement that has been use as past evidence has been proven wrong.
251:
237:
195:
191:
180:
132:
109:
290:
262:
206:
171:
139:
124:
39:
24:
184:
233:
216:
As a courtesy to other editors, it is a
Knowledge guideline to
280:
rather than leaving random questions on article talkpages?
198:. More information on self-organization can be found
152:
http://www.ridgecrest.ca.us/~do_while/sage/v2i1e.htm
8:
88:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
7:
100:, ask me on my talk page, or place
14:
232:pages. To do so, simply add four
164:ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny
242:Knowledge:Talk page guidelines
1:
291:16:49, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
58:The five pillars of Knowledge
78:How to write a great article
207:04:31, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
172:02:27, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
140:01:52, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
125:01:41, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
40:18:55, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
25:10:54, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
306:
263:15:26, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
131:Suggestion: use coherent
49:Hello, Barry White, and
30:keep up the good work
98:Knowledge:Questions
18:vestigial structure
272:Your questions on
63:How to edit a page
288:
108:Your comments in
297:
286:
259:
254:
249:
103:
305:
304:
300:
299:
298:
296:
295:
294:
270:
257:
252:
247:
226:user talk pages
214:
204:Roland Deschain
188:
169:Roland Deschain
122:Roland Deschain
113:
101:
83:Manual of Style
32:
12:
11:
5:
303:
301:
278:reference desk
269:
266:
220:your posts on
213:
210:
187:
178:
177:
176:
175:
174:
143:
142:
128:
127:
112:
106:
94:sign your name
86:
85:
80:
75:
70:
65:
60:
31:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
302:
293:
292:
289:
283:
279:
275:
267:
265:
264:
261:
260:
255:
250:
244:. Thank you.
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
211:
209:
208:
205:
201:
197:
193:
186:
182:
179:
173:
170:
165:
161:
160:
159:
158:
157:
154:
153:
149:
146:
141:
138:
134:
130:
129:
126:
123:
119:
118:
117:
111:
107:
105:
99:
95:
91:
84:
81:
79:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
64:
61:
59:
56:
55:
54:
52:
47:
46:
42:
41:
38:
29:
27:
26:
23:
19:
274:Talk:Kashrut
271:
268:Talk:Kashrut
245:
215:
189:
155:
150:
147:
144:
114:
87:
48:
44:
43:
33:
15:
230:WikiProject
222:talk pages
102:{{helpme}}
90:Wikipedian
68:Help pages
238:timestamp
192:Evolution
181:Evolution
148:evidence
133:sentences
110:Evolution
92:! Please
73:Tutorial
45:Welcome!
212:Signing
185:Entropy
137:JoshuaZ
51:welcome
253:Maurog
234:tildes
228:, and
22:Ec5618
194:page
287:T@lk
218:sign
200:here
196:here
183:and
37:nids
282:JFW
202:.--
284:|
224:,
258:•
248:•
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.