User talk:Bbarmadillo/Archive 1

3497:- I figured this was a more appropriate place. I appreciate your apology and kind words, and yes, I wasn't meaning that you had asked for my edits and I have been happy to do some tidying up of your work. However, I do choose to keep an eye on edits that have potential conflicts of interest because I believe in the neutrality of this project, and I would say that it does feel like too many of your paid articles have the same issues with content that is verging on 31: 2888: 616: 2823: 2228: 3841: 776: 1519: 544: 3898: 3746: 835: 3629: 3126: 2381: 2157: 687: 2245:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 365: 189: 2687: 2584: 2544: 1928: 1866: 1719: 1599: 1403: 1128: 1035: 962: 3595:

rules, how to code and so on). I also think that there is no such thing as an un-biased article (possibly, some Ancient Greek history articles and even there one would see multiple sides trying to impose their point of view). Also, over time many things that started as "paid" or "advertising" become history (as an example "

3564:. Any competent management could do it overnight, but Knowledge (XXG) doesn't have a management. The flood could be stopped if the community wanted to, but it doesn't. Even the disclosure requirement was essentially imposed from the top by the foundation. There are people who troll any discussion about paid editing because 3510:, it can feel like you are expecting volunteers to spend a large amount of time justifying their edits to you, when you perhaps should be realising that as a paid editor, the onus is going to continue to be on you to very carefully demonstrate notability and neutrality in the first place. I hope that helps clarify. Cheers, 3001:

Robert, I am doing quite a lot of work fixing categories as part of Uncategorized Task Force. This is not paid job, it's Knowledge (XXG) mainteinance. So if I am prohibited from editing anything US-polotics related, but I see a page with no categoriez or poor categories does it still apply. Or purely

2844:

Stop asking volunteer editors for technical assistance in using Knowledge (XXG) tools that apparently you aren't using effectively. I don't know what the technical problem is, but it isn't up to real volunteer editors to help you change a few words in order to make the article a better advertisement

3594:

that paid edits should be clearly seen (much like media articles have "Advertising" tag). But I think there is a thin line here. I've noticed that many subjects are not on Knowledge (XXG) not because they are not notable, but because it is simply too hard for the people to make it right (knowing the

3378:

I was reviewing the article as a new article (there is a bit of a backlog in reviewing them) and I started to remove all of the content from the "Philanthropy and sponsorship" section onwards as spam, but decided in the end that the whole article was too promotional, its even got 16 citations in the

2067:

But the biggest problem I see is that the "history" section was purely (and is still almost completely) a list of 'most popular' pieces or achievements. This is the kind of list a website or publication would write about themselves. A history should include facts about when and where it started, who

1897:

Thank you for taking a look at the article. I am sorry, but I don't understand your comment. There is a COI tag at the article's talk page that gives all the information about this task that I have. I wrote this article from scratch and published to Knowledge (XXG). I have no information about other

3023:

in that area may result in a topic ban. Second, I do not plan to be the trainer or mentor or assistant for an editor who is sometimes a paid editor. Third, I am not an expert on categories, and I know that they are complex. If you want help with the technical aspects of assigning categories, you

2986:

No. What don't you understand? You don't seem to get it. You ask if I should be your main point of contact if you encounter poor or no categories. You again seem to be asking me to help you, who are being paid, to do your job of editing. No. If you continue to ask volunteer editors to do your

3161:

The article is a thinly disguised advertisement, with the promotional terminology framed as quotes to seem more neutral. Although there is evidence of notability and some of the criticism is included, the tone on the positive portions is glowing, while the negative is careful and considered. The

2193:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

738:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

3095:

Thank you for your message, I just wanted to respond and state that I don't have any COI editing the pages of Harvey and Eddie Newquist. I have edited both pages with their permission but don't personally know either of them. The reason the photographs are cited as belonging to Eddie Newquist but

3571:

The handful of activists who want to protect the neutrality and intellectual independence of the encyclopedia are prevented from doing anything truly effective. So they (or "we") resort to doing what they can do, which sometimes amounts to scrutinizing the handful of disclosed paid editors.

1531:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3451:

There was a lot more that needed improvement, such as the name dropping and the list of dealers. I kept the key item, the work in the museum. I'm not sure about the importance of the awards. If you restore them, do so as concisely as possible, and don't put them in the infobox.

2948:. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. 3528:"more heavily scrutinized" is a nice word for "double standards" :) You are completely right and I am learning some lessons. Note that I don't always disagree with the edits made to my articles. Sorry again for getting personal at the WTR discussion. -- 1898:

editors who worked on the article or the nature of their edits. This article was deleted because the COI has not been stated (my bad). I asked the editor to recover the article to my userspace and reworked it, adding more information. Hope it helps. --

556:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

3867:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

802:

3505:

issues. After the time you have been here, this should be improving and you should know that paid editing it always going to be more heavily scrutinised. In terms of my comment about time, for example, when I follow some of your comments at

3552:

whose useless promotional articles pass the New Page Patrol easily, and whose assumed good faith would be defended to death by a large part of the community. I guess that's the price you pay for the doing the right thing. That's not to say

3379:

lead, so I think I will leave it to an administrator to decide. I can see you have put a lot of work into it. I suggest you keep a copy in your sandbox in case you want to recreate a less promotional article in future if it gets deleted.

3545:

UNLIKE some other American lawyer articles (yes, I am full aware of WP:OSE, no need to remind me about it) that were created from one-time, zero-history accounts and contain "exactly the sort of advertisement masquerading as something

719:, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read 1559: 584: 3871:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

2412:

There is much here which is acceptable but a lot of unsourced content which gives opinions or is original research. Each and every statement of fact requires a source as a paid editor you should be fully aware of

806:

454:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 3599:" article created in 1954 would be a "promotional", "no depth coverage" and "passing mention", now it is history and deserves an article). This is why the community should probably not try to stop the flood. -- 2914:

to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is

1543:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 568:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2772:

I should note, as a warning, that this was scraping the barrel for notability. One solid source discussing him, the rest more than passing mentions but nothing too solid, just about good enough. It

2970:

in this again. Working with improving categories I see quite many articles about the US politics. So should you be my main point of contact if I encounter an article with poor or no categories? --

2708: 1949: 1740: 1620: 1424: 1149: 1056: 2915: 2911: 2279:

Now that the other editor's objections have been assuaged, please feel free to reopen a new edit request containing your proposals for this article, at your earliest convenience. Regards,

2552: 2505: 3757: 3364:

please nominate for the normal deletion or remove the tag and suggest for the improvement. The article has passed AFC process and has been reviewed by an independent moderator. --

2068:

is involved, and perhaps a brief overview of key achievements (as well as any key criticisms or problems), but at this stage, that section is not at all neutral and encyclopedic.

3494: 3660:

of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Knowledge (XXG), please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

3157:

of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Knowledge (XXG), please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

3590:

thanks. As you see, I am not giving up and not going "black hat", making my edits from this account and trying to defend them where I feel it is right. I actually agree with

3768:

during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —

2042:

and it would be helpful if you could have two separate lists of those articles you just have a COI with, and those you have been paid (broadly construed) to edit. Thanks,

2503:! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the 3864: 3666:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

3164:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

2415:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

658:

Thank you for the notification. My paid contributions have been disclosed. One of the articles has been deleted before I was able to dislose my affiliation. --

2493: 620: 3853: 3285: 799: 788: 508: 333: 288: 3959: 3649: 3146: 2401: 2257: 2179: 2146: 896: 716: 676: 106: 3680:

If you now believe the draft cannot meet Knowledge (XXG)'s standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to

3178:

If you now believe the draft cannot meet Knowledge (XXG)'s standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to

2429:

If you now believe the draft cannot meet Knowledge (XXG)'s standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to

3652:, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Knowledge (XXG)'s 3149:, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Knowledge (XXG)'s 130: 389: 2929: 3281: 504: 329: 284: 2839: 1573: 598: 479: 3398:

I am ready to rework the article by removing the content that looks promotional (including the lead section). Please give me some time. -

3963: 3645: 3635: 3616: 3142: 3132: 3113: 2907: 2831: 2722: 2674: 2606: 2571: 2397: 2387: 2368: 2198:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 1963: 1915: 1754: 1706: 1634: 1586: 1438: 1390: 1163: 1115: 1070: 1022: 900: 743:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 90: 2937: 1328:

Sorry for the confusion, what I meant was the page name is now User:Bbarmadillo/Paolo Costagli and should just be Paolo Costagli.--

624: 2430: 2423: 2372: 3717: 3215: 2718: 2602: 2466: 2405: 2237: 2078:

tag which you removed (side note - as a paid and COI editor you should let someone else do this, not you) should be reinstated.

2034:

Thanks for your message on my talk page - I'll have a look at the article shortly. Just one thing, your user page declares your

1959: 1750: 1630: 1434: 1159: 1066: 120: 3557:

should not be deleted, it should, but there are tens of thousands of articles by undeclared SPAs that could be deleted first.

2920:

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means

1569: 594: 475: 224: 76: 71: 66: 2515:, a friendly space on Knowledge (XXG) where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 2393: 1552: 990:

Please stop asking every reviewer to review your draft. If it has been submitted, it will be reviewed in due time. Thank you.

696: 577: 125: 3779: 1479: 501:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 326:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 281:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 213: 3951: 3909: 3887: 2967: 2862: 2241:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 888: 846: 824: 724: 2777: 2752: 1828: 1784: 3955: 3162:

second sentence of the article is an advertising claim, which is notably contested. Much of the article needs a rewrite.

2933: 2246: 2195: 892: 740: 3101: 3857: 2945: 792: 466:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

3271: 1564: 1496:

Thank you very much for approving the article. I plan to work a bit more on this article (wording and shortening). --

589: 471: 2941: 2921: 1736: 703: 3591: 493:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

318:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

273:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

38: 3653: 3150: 3033: 2992: 2956: 2851: 2925: 2074:

say about it (not about one article, but about the site as a whole) - if these can't be found, then perhaps the

111: 97: 2798: 2390:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

1808: 968: 953: 2704: 1540: 565: 3756:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 3135:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TeaDrinker was:

3097: 2520: 2476: 2213: 2190: 2164: 2150: 1668: 1197: 1145: 3657: 3275: 3154: 3019:- First, you have not been prohibited from editing US politics. You have only been cautioned that editing 2894:

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Knowledge (XXG). It does

137: 3507: 2167:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done for the following reason:

1725: 1710: 424: 259: 3967: 3323: 3238:

thank you for reviewing the article. Your feedback is very clear. I will work on the article further. --

2693: 2678: 2080:

Finally, as a paid editor, you are kindly asked to suggest changes on the article's talk page (using the

904: 467: 149: 3975: 3821: 3801: 3604: 3554: 3533: 3476: 3420: 3403: 3369: 3243: 3080: 3007: 2975: 2870: 2806: 2662: 2356: 2308: 2131: 2126:

please check my userpage. I've tried to add two articles to template and it doesn't seem to work. :{ --

2110: 2081: 2019: 1903: 1818: 1694: 1501: 1354: 1319: 1280: 1238: 1010: 936: 663: 141: 47: 17: 3765: 3749: 3738: 3681: 3674: 3664:

Not that well-disguised! It's an ad., for a desert, and it's not suitable. Tagging for Speedy Deletion.

3620: 3179: 3172: 3117: 2511: 2062: 1872: 1857: 3638:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:

3267: 3075:

Thank you. My bad. I gave my comments. And looks like (I was right) the issue has been sorted out. --

1945: 853:

Blatant advertising. COI. Possible paid editing. If anything, belongs as an item under parent company.

93:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: 3938: 3434: 3429:

The page is improved somewhat, and I will just leave it to the reviewing admin to decide what to do.

3384: 3351: 3341: 3258:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

3225: 3029: 2988: 2952: 2847: 2325:

Why should 'the guy who wanted to have this article on Knowledge (XXG)' particularly want to contact

1368: 1333: 1258: 1216: 101: 3641: 3138: 3056:

Please remember to notify editors when you mention them at the noticeboards. See the top of page at

1527: 552: 534: 443: 434: 2987:

work for you on behalf of your client or employer, it may be necessary to take unpleasant action.

2287: 1420: 1104: 976: 2329:? In view of the circumstances of the deletion, please start a new article from scratch. Thanks. 1536: 561: 463: 447: 3773: 2516: 2472: 2319: 2209: 2105:

Thank you for your edits and comments. Will take them into consideration and act accordingly. --

1934: 1919: 1680: 1664: 1475: 1298: 1193: 1134: 1119: 1052: 995: 875: 735: 712: 680: 3498: 2535: 2057:

I have done a quick review of the article, there were plenty of words and phrases that were not

148:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out 3934: 3877: 3577: 3515: 3301: 2924:

administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the

2827: 2640: 2509:. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the 2334: 2172: 2089: 2047: 1997: 1880: 1616: 871: 646: 632: 524: 420: 369: 349: 304: 255: 193: 171: 153: 3415:

please check the article again. I think I've removed most of the promotional content now. --

3057: 2205: 2058: 1548: 720: 573: 459: 451: 3971: 3817: 3797: 3688: 3600: 3529: 3472: 3416: 3399: 3365: 3329:

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can

3239: 3186: 3076: 3016: 3003: 2971: 2866: 2802: 2658: 2590: 2575: 2437: 2352: 2304: 2127: 2106: 2015: 1899: 1814: 1690: 1497: 1350: 1315: 1276: 1234: 1006: 932: 659: 3921: 3761: 3753: 3549: 2038:

but not paid editing, which needs to be done more formally. The simplest way is to use the

2035: 1853: 1551:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1544: 949: 858: 576:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 569: 462:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 455: 376:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

200:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

3905: 3891: 3430: 3412: 3395: 3380: 3361: 3347: 3259: 3235: 3221: 2404:. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid 2265: 1364: 1344: 1329: 1290: 1270: 1254: 1228: 1212: 912: 641:

Please disclose all contributions you made in exchange for a payment as soon as possible.

394: 229: 218: 3793: 3548:

I agree with you here, you are treated much more harshly than most of the obviously paid

3025: 3020: 2717:. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can 2601:. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can 2242: 2071: 3278:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 715:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under 3979: 3881: 3825: 3805: 3783: 3731: 3727: 3608: 3581: 3537: 3519: 3480: 3463: 3438: 3424: 3407: 3388: 3373: 3355: 3319: 3305: 3247: 3229: 3105: 3084: 3069: 3037: 3011: 2996: 2979: 2960: 2874: 2855: 2810: 2791: 2766: 2741: 2666: 2644: 2625: 2564: 2524: 2480: 2360: 2338: 2312: 2300: 2294: 2282: 2269: 2217: 2135: 2114: 2093: 2051: 2023: 2001: 1982: 1907: 1884: 1842: 1822: 1798: 1773: 1698: 1672: 1653: 1577: 1505: 1483: 1457: 1409: 1394: 1372: 1358: 1337: 1323: 1302: 1284: 1262: 1242: 1220: 1201: 1182: 1108: 1100: 1089: 1014: 999: 980: 972: 940: 916: 818: 760: 667: 650: 636: 602: 528: 483: 428: 412: 353: 308: 263: 247: 177: 3920:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be

3502: 2887: 2075: 857:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be

3848: 3832: 3789: 3769: 3459: 3292:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

3065: 2560: 2039: 1871:

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

1491: 1471: 1309: 1294: 1041: 1026: 991: 967:

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

928: 842: 828: 814: 756: 515:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

494: 340:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

295:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

3745: 3873: 3752:, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for 3596: 3587: 3573: 3565: 3525: 3511: 3297: 3293: 2652: 2636: 2346: 2330: 2121: 2100: 2085: 2043: 2009: 1993: 1892: 1876: 1686: 1605: 1590: 642: 628: 520: 516: 345: 341: 300: 296: 163: 116: 3644:

than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a

3141:

than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a

2822: 2714: 2598: 2492: 1955: 1746: 1626: 1518: 1430: 1155: 1062: 543: 1962:, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to 1753:, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to 1633:, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to 1437:, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to 1162:, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to 1069:, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to 3568:

was blocked for promotional editing more than a decade ago. It blows my mind.

2194:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

739:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

205: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3628: 3125: 2380: 3562:

stopping the flood of undeclared edits with current measures is a total utopia

2261: 1211:

It's looking good nothing missing that I can see it formatted as it should be

924: 908: 411:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

278: 246:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

3723: 2070:

Overall, the article needs more third-party sources, that is, what do other

1289:

I'd say it's fine where it is, but when you're ready to submit just place {{

783: 767: 381: 319: 274: 3944:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

881:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

3468: 3454: 3263: 3061: 2826:

Please do not add promotional material to Knowledge (XXG), as you did to

2556: 2548: 809: 751: 695:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

2721:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

2605:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

1555:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

931:

is not a paid entry. It is a legendary American brand with a history. --

580:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

498: 450:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

2713:

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

2597:

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

2185:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

1954:

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

1745:

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

1625:

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

1429:

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

1154:

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

1061:

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

730:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

2686: 2583: 2543: 1927: 1865: 1718: 1598: 1402: 1253:

Hi Peter, looks like you saved this on your user page by mistake. --

1127: 1034: 961: 2740:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

2624:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

1981:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

1772:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

1652:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

1456:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

1181:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

1088:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

2223:

Orphaned non-free image File:The National Memo October 07 2011.png

323: 145: 89:

Hello, Bbarmadillo, and welcome to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for

2696:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 2593:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 1937:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 1728:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 1608:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 1412:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 1137:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 1044:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 3337:, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. 2182:, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time. 3673:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

3171:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

2422:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

1558:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

583:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

3718:

Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors

3501:, as well as not being properly sourced and some questionable 3216:

Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors

2898:

imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

2467:

Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors

162:

and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome!

25: 3764:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

3896: 3627: 3124: 2685: 2582: 2551:. I have replied to your question about a submission at the 2379: 2226: 2200: 2155: 1926: 1864: 1717: 1597: 1401: 1126: 1033: 960: 833: 745: 685: 2845:

for your blog, when Knowledge (XXG) is not for advertising.

2834:

about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services

3852:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

2303:

thank a lot for your edits. You are an awesome editor! --

2204:, or if you have already done so, you can place a request 787:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

3758:

Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Arctic Zero

3684:, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add " 3182:, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add " 2729: