Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Bgrus22

Source 📝

22: 191: 161: 347:
Thank you for taking the time to write this message, it is very much appreciated. I didn't realize there were other G-d fearing folks here editing on the site. I hope you stay well and safe in these trying times! Feel free to send me a message if you ever need a hand with something or to get any
93:, and its contents should not be imported into Knowledge (XXG). It's written by random people, who sometimes make up hoaxes when they're bored, much like Knowledge (XXG). For this reason, we require citations to be to sources that are not 235: 227: 220: 212: 208: 264:
hope youre doing well, long time no see! thanks for letting me know right now I am working on a few pages ranging from a footballer to Italian politicians. Hope thats all fine a' okay.
300:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Knowledge (XXG) by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
207:
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
166:
In recognition of high-quality editing on current events often extremely politically-charged and difficult to manage by all but the greatest editors.
238:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 97:. Usually, this means articles written by professional journalists or academics in a source that has editorial control – for example, 231: 315: 113:, we don't user reviews. They are subject to vote stacking and brigading. Instead, we use professional services, such as 216: 43: 38: 126: 55: 348:
pages started. Oh and your page is amazing, I may be stealing some tags you have that I didn't know about :) .
248: 122: 99: 61: 94: 136:
it says on wiki that user reviews are acceptable as long as they are identified as user reviews
327: 171: 105: 259: 243: 197:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.
57: 21: 293: 90: 190: 349: 342: 322: 289: 265: 167: 160: 137: 114: 82: 285: 118: 110: 59: 357: 334: 273: 251: 175: 145: 130: 203:
imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
86: 62: 15: 77: 309: 305: 304:To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with 109:, which often cover American films. Second, per 298: 280:I have sent you a note about a page you started 292:, while examining this page as a part of our 8: 284:Hello, Bgrus22. Thank you for your work on 226:For additional information, please see the 211:is in effect. Any administrator may impose 308:. Please remember to sign your reply with 223:, when making edits related to the topic. 75:Hi. I wanted to explain why I reverted 71:IMDb, reliable sources, and user reviews 215:on editors who do not strictly follow 7: 228:guidance on discretionary sanctions 152:Brownies for you! Hope you like em 14: 318:tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) 189: 159: 20: 296:, had the following comments: 1: 131:08:27, 15 December 2019 (UTC) 314:(Message delivered via the 374: 221:page-specific restrictions 217:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies 111:MOS:FILM#Audience response 358:17:35, 4 April 2024 (UTC) 335:01:03, 3 April 2024 (UTC) 274:01:19, 24 July 2020 (UTC) 252:12:17, 23 July 2020 (UTC) 176:01:37, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 146:10:20, 3 March 2020 (UTC) 353: 269: 141: 232:Arbitration Committee's 209:discretionary sanctions 302: 294:page curation process 319: 181: 180: 106:Los Angeles Times 68: 67: 49: 48: 365: 346: 332: 331: 325: 313: 311: 307: 263: 246: 193: 184:Important Notice 163: 156: 155: 123:NinjaRobotPirate 80: 78:your recent edit 63: 35: 34: 24: 16: 373: 372: 368: 367: 366: 364: 363: 362: 340: 329: 328: 323: 282: 257: 244: 241: 240: 194: 186: 154: 91:reliable source 76: 73: 64: 58: 29: 12: 11: 5: 371: 369: 361: 360: 306:{{Re|SunDawn}} 281: 278: 277: 276: 195: 188: 187: 185: 182: 179: 178: 164: 153: 150: 149: 148: 95:user-generated 72: 69: 66: 65: 60: 56: 54: 51: 50: 47: 46: 41: 31: 30: 25: 19: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 370: 359: 355: 351: 344: 339: 338: 337: 336: 333: 326: 320: 317: 316:Page Curation 301: 297: 295: 291: 287: 279: 275: 271: 267: 261: 256: 255: 254: 253: 250: 247: 239: 237: 233: 229: 224: 222: 218: 214: 210: 205: 204: 202: 192: 183: 177: 173: 169: 165: 162: 158: 157: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 134: 133: 132: 128: 124: 120: 116: 112: 108: 107: 102: 101: 96: 92: 88: 84: 79: 70: 53: 52: 45: 42: 40: 37: 36: 33: 32: 28: 23: 18: 17: 321: 303: 299: 283: 242: 225: 206: 200: 198: 196: 104: 98: 74: 26: 324:✠ SunDawn ✠ 260:Doug Weller 245:Doug Weller 115:CinemaScore 83:The Dentist 286:Hava Inbar 330:(contact) 234:decision 219:, or the 213:sanctions 89:is a not 44:Archive 2 39:Archive 1 230:and the 199:It does 119:PostTrak 27:Archives 350:Bgrus22 343:SunDawn 290:SunDawn 266:Bgrus22 168:Fvoltes 138:Bgrus22 103:or the 100:Variety 85:. The 354:talk 310:~~~~ 270:talk 249:talk 236:here 172:talk 142:talk 127:talk 87:IMDb 201:not 117:or 81:to 356:) 312:. 288:. 272:) 174:) 144:) 129:) 121:. 352:( 345:: 341:@ 268:( 262:: 258:@ 170:( 140:( 125:(

Index


Archive 1
Archive 2
your recent edit
The Dentist
IMDb
reliable source
user-generated
Variety
Los Angeles Times
MOS:FILM#Audience response
CinemaScore
PostTrak
NinjaRobotPirate
talk
08:27, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Bgrus22
talk
10:20, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Fvoltes
talk
01:37, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

discretionary sanctions
sanctions
Knowledge (XXG)'s policies
page-specific restrictions
guidance on discretionary sanctions
Arbitration Committee's

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.