315:
115:
72:
23:
385:, #11. It does not specify how many times it must be played, but the term national means across the country in multiple major cities. You don't think the article should be on Knowledge (XXG) because you don't consider someone under the age of 18 to be notable in any way. There are multiple signed and unsigned artists who would fit under #11 in
471:... but he is as entitled to advocate deleting the article as you are to argue for not deleting it. However, he did say something true, which is if you continue this behavior, you will be blocked. Also, please read and follow the links in the above welcome message - I think you would find it useful. --
448:
I just don't think it's fair that I can be labeled as such and not be able to fight it, or argue against it. I've been editing other articles also, and I do hope to continue to edit and contribute to
Knowledge (XXG). But I'd like this 'Bgwhite' to instead of fight against, work to expand the article
189:
To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. To start creating a draft article, just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit that
295:
I apologize that you feel you had a rough welcome, but usually the type of editing you have performed is frowned upon by the community - in particular removing warning templates that exist for purpose. If yu feel like you want to contribute to editing wikipedia, please read the above
467:, it explains it all. Not being an SPA requires both time and edits, so even if you are editing other topics, the appellation will remain for sometime. However, calling an editor SPA who is not one, well, that is not OK. I think Bgwhite needs a big, frosty beer and not
389:
who are under 18. Furthermore, you continue to mock me using SPA attachments, though I refuse to be labeled as such. Another possibility could be that you are homophobic. I don't know what your problem is, but the article we are talking about CLEARLY fits under
191:
437:- this is not necessarily a bad thing, but something that we take into account in discussions, in particular deletion discussions. The only way to stop being labeled an SPA is to stop being one, by constructively editing other topics. --
336:
190:
page as you would any other. If the page you created has already been deleted from
Knowledge (XXG), but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask
145:
Excuse me, but that is NOT vandalism. I do not wish to be called a spammer, or a simple purposed user. I JUST started
Knowledge (XXG), and you're already labeling me. Not cool. --
381:
Are you calling me a fool? You don't listen, do you? You're the one who should 'take a moment and read first'. The article we're talking about fits in the criteria of
186:
and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.
433:
doesn't fit the bill as he has over 65870 edits with a very diverse editing history. I know you consider it unfair that you are being labeled an SPA, but please read
76:
463:
I do understand it feels unfair, but it is almost a rite of passage here: if you survive it and become a committed editor the appellation will disappear - just read
272:
214:
256:
276:
197:
The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately
422:
incorrectly, while not exactly vandalism as
Bgwhite claims, is very much a disruptive edit - the equivalent of vandalism. Please read
275:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out
41:
172:
355:
Instead of vandalizing and mud slinging, you should take a moment and read first. There is no "M". SPA - Single
Purpose Account
241:
167:
232:
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
206:
49:
412:
or not is what the discussion is about, just because you believe it so does it make it so. However, using the template
328:
261:
202:
178:
I notice that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a
236:
81:
268:
394:. So before intentionally calling me a fool, why don't you go back and read those articles? Thank you. --
323:
119:
45:
409:
391:
386:
382:
360:
251:
450:
395:
146:
198:
127:
118:
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to
Knowledge (XXG). Your edits appear to constitute
94:
33:
427:
364:
341:
339:
is vandalism. You have been warned twice, a third edit of vandalism may get your account blocked.
280:
368:
345:
86:
58:
468:
183:
464:
434:
423:
356:
179:
224:
135:
218:, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! You can also just type
201:. It is also worth noting that Knowledge (XXG) generally does not allow editors to have
123:
90:
75:
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on
Knowledge (XXG), as you did to
472:
438:
297:
284:
246:
98:
26:
Welcome to
Knowledge (XXG). Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this
416:
55:
37:
131:
205:. If your username does have such a name, it would be advisable for you to
182:. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a
477:
458:
443:
403:
372:
349:
302:
289:
154:
139:
103:
65:
335:
You have already been warned about edits that constitute vandalism.
203:
usernames which specifically link them to one company or corporation
89:. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
28:
126:
or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
212:
If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
97:
if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
85:, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
40:
from articles or removed other people's comments in
77:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Lowell Bekker
48:. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please
52:at the respective page instead. Thank you. —
363:, which defines when a musician is notable.
8:
267:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
194:and they will copy it to your user page.
277:Knowledge (XXG):Where to ask a question
44:. This makes it difficult to establish
7:
331:from editing without further notice
237:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
14:
313:
113:
70:
21:
478:03:18, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
459:00:10, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
444:00:07, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
404:23:55, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
373:23:49, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
350:09:00, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
303:04:48, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
290:04:45, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
155:04:31, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
140:04:30, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
104:04:26, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
66:03:41, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
1:
42:Articles for deletion debates
38:Articles for deletion notices
326:Knowledge (XXG), you may be
257:How to write a great article
207:request a change of username
309:Final Warning for Vandalism
215:New contributors' help page
502:
168:welcome to Knowledge (XXG)
359:. You should also read
337:This latest edit of yours
93:. Please make use of the
454:
449:we are talking about. --
399:
165:Hello, Beastphones, and
150:
199:be blocked from editing
192:anyone from this list
322:. The next time you
283:. Again, welcome!
180:conflict of interest
357:Knowledge (XXG):SPA
242:How to edit a page
173:your contributions
476:
442:
301:
288:
102:
61:
493:
475:
441:
421:
415:
317:
316:
300:
287:
230:
229:
223:
171:! Thank you for
117:
116:
101:
84:
74:
73:
63:
59:
31:
25:
24:
501:
500:
496:
495:
494:
492:
491:
490:
419:
413:
314:
311:
262:Manual of Style
227:
221:
220:
163:
114:
111:
80:
71:
54:
27:
22:
19:
12:
11:
5:
499:
497:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
376:
375:
310:
307:
306:
305:
296:information.--
273:sign your name
265:
264:
259:
254:
249:
244:
239:
162:
159:
158:
157:
122:and have been
110:
107:
36:, you removed
18:
17:September 2011
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
498:
479:
474:
470:
466:
462:
461:
460:
456:
452:
447:
446:
445:
440:
436:
432:
429:
425:
418:
411:
407:
406:
405:
401:
397:
393:
388:
384:
380:
379:
378:
377:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
353:
352:
351:
347:
343:
340:
338:
332:
330:
325:
321:
318:This is your
308:
304:
299:
294:
293:
292:
291:
286:
282:
279:or ask me on
278:
274:
270:
263:
260:
258:
255:
253:
250:
248:
245:
243:
240:
238:
235:
234:
233:
231:
226:
217:
216:
210:
208:
204:
200:
195:
193:
187:
185:
181:
176:
174:
170:
169:
160:
156:
152:
148:
144:
143:
142:
141:
137:
133:
130:. Thank you.
129:
125:
121:
108:
106:
105:
100:
96:
92:
88:
83:
78:
68:
67:
64:
62:
57:
51:
47:
43:
39:
35:
34:Lowell Bekker
30:
16:
430:
428:User:Bgwhite
408:If it meets
334:
327:
320:last warning
319:
312:
281:my talk page
266:
219:
213:
211:
196:
188:
177:
166:
164:
112:
87:edit summary
69:
53:
20:
451:Beastphones
410:WP:MUSICBIO
396:Beastphones
392:WP:MUSICBIO
387:WP:MUSICBIO
383:WP:MUSICBIO
361:WP:MUSICBIO
147:Beastphones
29:recent edit
431:definitely
269:Wikipedian
247:Help pages
324:vandalize
271:! Please
120:vandalism
82:this edit
56:Jeff G. ツ
46:consensus
473:Cerejota
469:bite you
439:Cerejota
298:Cerejota
285:Cerejota
252:Tutorial
124:reverted
99:Cerejota
91:reverted
365:Bgwhite
342:Bgwhite
329:blocked
184:neutral
161:Welcome
128:sandbox
109:Warning
95:sandbox
50:comment
465:WP:SPA
435:WP:SPA
424:WP:SPA
225:helpme
79:with
60:(talk)
132:Keb25
455:talk
400:talk
369:talk
346:talk
151:talk
136:talk
417:SPA
333:.
32:to
457:)
426:-
420:}}
414:{{
402:)
371:)
348:)
228:}}
222:{{
209:.
175:.
153:)
138:)
453:(
398:(
367:(
344:(
149:(
134:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.