User talk:Blake/Archive 5

697:

Hitmonlee is a distinct Pokémon that does not resemble human beings beyond being vaguely human-shaped. Therefore, while a side view may be acceptable for a human, which readers should understand, they may not understand what the whole of its appearance may be in such a pose. The reason we have used the FR/LG images for the most part is because they are of acceptable quality, whereas in the case of this, Hitmonlee is not in an ideal pose, which would suggest to us that a clearer depiction be used in its stead. -

672:(obviously a better image than the one I just provided of course, sans background) His appearance is much more obvious to the reader, as opposed to appearing in a very different way to one who was not aware of the series. On your comment on anime versus games, as long as Sugimori drew it (which he did - the image I provided earlier is from him, and is the official anime artwork), it should be acceptable. Exceptions should be made to provide the best possible depiction of a character. Originally, 1227: 1127: 1475: 31: 816: 804: 787: 1163:

and move your name from the "Inactive participants" list to the bottom of the "Active participants" list. If you are no longer an active member in the task force, you may simply remove your name altogether. On 23 December, all entries under the "Inactive participants" list will be removed. Hopefully

696:

Uniformity is not an acceptable argument - we can't do something for the sole purpose of having consistently similar articles. Articles should be designed in a way that improves them to the absolute maximum that they can be. It's not as trivial as an eye - the eye may be the only thing missing, but

1380:

Okay but either way, it's all set in the Mario Universe making him a Mario character, just that he's more prominent in the Donkey Kong series which is a spin-off to the Mario series. Plus if the article about him means anything, it tells that he is mst likely DK Jr. which would mean he's even more

1359:

Don't mean to be tedious, but it would be desirable to give the reader the clear idea in the intro sentence that we are talking about a game. The fact that "Game Freak" is involved in the franchise doesn't quite do it. By the way the type of game would be relevant as context...video game...board

680:

that depicted her turned away, but her head turned around and facing the reader. You could see several defining features, but it was decided that using this image would be detrimental to the understanding of the character. The image used currently has it to the side, and could very well mislead

456: 235:

Over the course of a month, it has become apparent that both the parties proposing to include or not include those romanizations cannot be convinced by the arguments or guidelines brought up by the other side. Therefore, a compromise is trying to be found that will satisfy both parties.

1184:

I forgot to respond. I'd like to help, but Fuchs seems to be looking for specific reception for various things, such as graphics, sound, etc. As can be seen in my recent edits, I'm not accustomed to that yet; I need to work on Pokémon Pinball: Ruby & Sapphire first as practice. -

363:

The problem right now is, though, that you and the other two are single purpose accounts, that have only edited Knowledge for the purpose of adding this web site. That constitutes link spam, regardless of if you have a conflict of interests. -

1343:

No need to personalise this discussion. It is not about what I understand. It is about the general reader, who needs to know in the very first sentence that this article is about games. Not everyone in the world understands what Pokeman is.

303:

Why do I keep butting heads with Wiki editors over DS being a reliable source or not? They are respected in the industry by publishers, developers, and PR. What can I do to validate this? Any help is greatly appreciated, thanks.

586:

I've only done type categories for Pokémon articles with 10 or more representatives for that type. It's just an experiment, in the event that the section becomes vast enough to warrant separate categories for better navigation. -

906: 1089:

is what you are referring to, this isn't a consensus at all. It talks about what games should get there own articles. Only one person mentioned where they should go in the template. That's not a consensus at all.

1205:

I left a message on Magios talk page and let him know I updated the code so all he has to do is update it. If you want the code for the Pokemon one (or the whole thing) just let me know. Its in regex currently.

925: 920: 636:- This image shows a much clearer depiction. Rather than using the most recent depiction, it is best to use the depiction that more clearly shows the character, as shown in the decision to use 911: 496:

Um, hi. Its Linkbean. Saw your message there and I understand. Didn't know that Bulbapedia wasn't a reliable resource, so I apologize for making you waste your time to delete that. KTHXBAI

1045: 1027: 278: 244: 237: 229: 202: 1381:

apart of the Mario series. But being a notable character and having appeared in multiple Mario spin-off games classifys him as a supporting character more within the Mario series. --

1288:, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Knowledge. 401:, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Knowledge. 811: 807: 177:

That announcement about the no-old-Poke's-on-local-dex thing is grinding my gears. What kind of a game is this? Are you sure that's legit? And do you think Pokemon is about to

1360:

game....other...all of the above... No need to reply further; i shall not pursue this matter, but appreciate your willingness to bring it up at your discussion group. cheers.

724:

I haven't deleted the content; I have it sitting in a Word document. I find it better for me to write such content from scratch, and then add in the previous content later. -

1041: 1023: 1105:

So that's why it was changed in the first place without discussion? A consensus was never reached so there is nothing wrong with putting it back to how it originally was. --

1012: 1036: 994: 1003: 1008: 1057: 1032: 990: 670: 1240: 1192: 1160: 1140: 731: 704: 688: 655: 625: 594: 573: 534: 438: 371: 163: 126: 999: 1159:

All participants have been placed on an "Inactive participants" list. To confirm that you're still a member of the Nintendo task force, simply go to

960: 744:

Thanks for the heads up. I know there's some notable sources out there for refs but I just need time to find it. Also where is the discussion?

969: 240:

on a compromise has been given already, but it has not found unanimous agreement, so additional compromises are encouraged to be suggested.

243:

One universally accepted point was to bring more users from the affected projects in to help achieve consensus, and you were one of those

1292: 405: 1281: 394: 956: 398: 386: 965: 766: 320: 547:

I'm doing some checking on some references, but it looks like they might be able to exist as two separate articles just fine.--

1400:

Would you mind leaving this user another message? He clearly thinks that you are OK with the clearly bad edits he's making to

1277: 512: 390: 348:

Have a criteria for your articles. Every article must be gone over by other editors in order to ensure validity and quality.

143: 867: 1453:

Hi, Bws2cool. I have a question; sorry to bother you. Is the Pokemon WikiProject associated with Bulbapedia in any way?

1401: 153: 110: 1189: 728: 701: 685: 652: 622: 591: 570: 531: 435: 368: 160: 123: 1482: 38: 1541: 1533: 1528: 1516: 1511: 1503: 1300: 857: 413: 97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 1086: 1186: 725: 698: 682: 649: 619: 603: 588: 567: 528: 432: 365: 157: 120: 116: 978: 638: 182: 138: 1365: 1349: 1110: 1095: 286: 228:(for the sake of simplicity, I called this case "words of English origin", more information on semantics 113: 879: 552: 148: 1285: 1273: 1296: 832: 762: 754: 500: 409: 316: 312: 308: 282: 1386: 1250: 478: 1314:

There's some additional comments there brought up by Guy, and I've rephrased some of my concerns.

1461: 1233: 1226: 1165: 1133: 1126: 1066: 974: 634: 508: 429: 427: 455: 527:- Want to split this up, do half 'n half? I'll do Water and Poison after I'm done with work. - 1437: 1411: 1361: 1345: 1276:. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Knowledge uses a set of 1211: 1106: 1091: 644: 389:. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Knowledge uses a set of 178: 1327: 1315: 610:

I was wondering, since Hitmonlee is in an awkward pose, if you could make an image of their

548: 1491: 1423: 873: 851: 845: 758: 745: 47: 17: 1280:

to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from

393:

to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from

144:

http://www.gamesradar.com/f/the-most-disturbing-pokemon-of-all-time/a-2010042210464734011

1427: 1382: 471: 1457: 1291:

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on

1153: 504: 404:

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on

154:

http://www.gamesradar.com/f/pokemon-monday-10-veni-vidi-victini/a-2010072614652996041

1431: 1405: 1207: 1170: 1071: 776: 342: 111:

http://www.gamesradar.com/f/the-most-overused-pokemon-designs/a-2010072310344160054

1164:

you can stay with us and continue to work on Nintendo-related articles. Regards,

525: 1490:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1465: 1443: 1417: 1390: 1369: 1353: 1332: 1320: 1304: 1262: 1215: 1195: 1174: 1114: 1099: 1075: 748: 734: 707: 691: 658: 628: 597: 576: 556: 537: 483: 441: 417: 374: 324: 290: 190: 166: 129: 815: 803: 566:

There appears to be broken history. You should request a history merge. -

117:

http://diehardgamefan.com/2009/03/27/ask-the-kliq-pokemon-week-episode-12/

139:

http://diehardgamefan.com/2009/03/22/pokemon-week-the-evolution-solution/

665:

It's awkward to only see half of the Pokémon. Even if the artwork from

338: 114:

http://diehardgamefan.com/2009/03/26/pokemon-week-my-favorite-pokemon/

642:

images for characters from that game rather than the images made for

149:

http://diehardgamefan.com/2009/03/23/pokemon-week-pokemon-professors/

207:

including or not including romanizations for words of English origin

786: 256:

You should give feedback on the first suggested compromise and are

673: 669:, where it is kicking, were used, it would be a better depiction: 270:

This is not a vote on including or excluding such romanizations.

1469: 1156:, which we periodically do to keep our membership up-to-date. 25: 1243:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1225: 1143:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1125: 900: 838: 1152:

It's that time again to update membership status with the

681:

readers into misinterpreting its physical appearance. -

921:

Feature: New article announcements and article requests

277:

It would be highly appreciated if you came over to the

618:

depictions, which shows a clear image of Hitmonlee. -

381:

License tagging for File:Donkeykongcountryreturns.jpg

337:

Be under an umbrella reliable source - for example,

1193: