User talk:Buidhe/Archive 12

2052:’s observation is of uttermost importance. It reveals that the Kurds were deeply affected by Young Turkish population and extermination policies and subject to social engineering already before the establishment of a Turkish nation state by Mustafa Kemal in 1922.6 The discussion of the question whether the deportation and forced assimilation of Kurds by the Young Turks has to be labelled as genocide or ethnocide is, at least from a historian’s perspective, irrelevant since a clarification of this particularly legal and political issue depends on the definition of genocide one resorts to.7 It is, however, important to acknowledge that the Young Turkish leaders aimed at eliminating Kurdish identity by deporting them from their ancestral land and by dispersing them in small groups. The Young Turks partially implemented these plans during World War I: up to 700,000 Kurds were forcibly removed; half of the displaced perished. This important but often neglected fact has consequences for our understanding of the terrible fate of minorities in the late Ottoman Empire. It suggests that the fate of none of those groups, be they Christian as the Armenians, Assyrians or Greek, or be they Muslim as the Kurds, can be treated in isolation." I don't think it's necessary to mention Kurds in the lead, but reducing it to "Christians" is not supported by the cited sources, so I hoped my wording would be concise and match the source material. ( 2076:

Christian subjects. For example according to the scholar Adam Jones: "A resolution was placed before the IAGS membership to recognize the Greek and Assyrian/Chaldean components of the Ottoman genocide against Christians, alongside the Armenian strand of the genocide (which the IAGS has already formally acknowledged).", some sources such as The Thirty-Year Genocide which argues That the Hamidian massacres, Armenian Genocide, Assyrian genocide] and Greek genocide should be understood as a single event which targeted all the Christian minorities in the Ottoman empire. Also, the Deportations of Kurds as part of Late Ottoman genocides is not included by all historians or scholars, Have a nice day.

4202: 1367:, Mass killings under communist regimes is not only problematic for mixing all the topics I listed, among other NPOV and synthesis violations, but it is actively harmful in promoting those views which are revisionist and fringe in academia and scholarship as mainstream views. Since those views are popular among the news media and the general population, especially in the Anglo-sphere and in Eastern Europe, it is especially important they are not replicated as they reflect 3852: 962: 3808:: Part of the issue is that the scale used in this RfC is not the same as that used in other RfCs on the noticeboard. I'm therefore paying more attention to the substantive comments made than to the bolded options because it's possible some !voters were confused on that score. I've reworded the close so it makes no mention of any particular option. However, overall, I don't see a consensus that the site is generally reliable for all types of information. ( 1466: 31: 1375:, where scholarly analysis is presented as criticism and "alling it criticism is giving equal validity to a organization that promotes fringe views." I was a victim of this because I thought those were mainstream views within academia and scholarship; having those article as they currently are is not only unhelpful but it is actively harmful in implying those are mainstream, rather than fringe, views. I am the proof of this. 3863: 889:

speaking, if the organizer is distributing conference papers in some Open Access form and NUP is publishing an edited collection of the same material (sort of), those may be mostly the same. But as with many published dissertations, they can differ, sometimes quite a lot. To an extent, I'm not sure it's worth the time to contact the editors and have someone adjudicate the question, but I think you've made an assumption.

695: 798: 4209: 3544: 2836: 1061: 1527: 4355: 4267: 3240: 3156: 2730: 2418: 1869: 1739: 608: 272: 186: 1649: 3069: 1396: 489: 3035:. The final step would be to move "Draft:Move/John Fetterman (politician)" to "John Fetterman (politician)" without leaving a redirect behind. That slightly more complicated form of round-robin page swap would ensure that Wikidata pages are tied to the correct enwiki pages when the page moves are done. Thank you for reading and hope this helps you in the future 3493: 747:. Dweller's page didn't work for this very reason. We basically need to know here not what minor issues there are, but whether something has been posted on talk and whether we need to proceed to the next step, be that FAR or moving to the Satisfactory list. Just a diff to the talk page will work out best in the long run. Bst, 2906:

While it's possible to get consensus to move it somewhere other than originally proposed, in this discussion, there is clearly no consensus to move it anywhere. I think, if you have a better idea what to name it, you would be better off waiting a few weeks then opening a new move discussion. Keep in

2075:

Thank you for the answer, I don't see that sentence as inconsistent with sources, the sentence cited two specific groups (Assyrians and Greeks), and their treatment (Armenians and Assyrians and Greeks) is considered by some historians to be part of the same genocidal campaigns and policy against its

1986:

I see that your edit is once again reverted, again by Assyrian nationalists. The user States that Assyrian is the umbrella term for all Syriac-Arameans and Chaldeans which totally is not true. The same user is opposing a page about the modern Aramean people for several months already to fullfill his

936:

You've done the research, and I'll gladly take your word for it. Thank you. But it's quite common for open-access and for-sale editions to exist simultaneously. Enough scholars want a hard copy of something they've used online that, assuming their department is paying for it, you'd be surprised, you

4225:

has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality

3451:

I appreciate that, but we also both know that link-rot and other factors beyond our control doesn't help things. I am going to try and make a dent in this, but as with other Belarus articles that have a similar rating, it was pretty much a one-person job over ten years ago or so when standards were

2216:

I really understood the 2 weeks banning on the page Syriac Orthodox Church. But from what I see on Knowledge (XXG) there is an ongoing Assyrian sect removing names as Syriac and Chaldean and replacing them with ‘Assyrian’ this is a view that is highly pushed by Assyrian nationalists and thus has no

742:

for the following reasons. We have over 4,000 FAs to get through, and I don't want the page to turn into something similar to what happened at Dweller's page. If everyone runs through putting in comments about minor issues, we'll make no progress on the overall picture. It will be more effective

1568:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

3133:

for letting me know about my student's translation of the Josine Müller page. It's actually fine for my course for students to do translations. However, if something in her translation was problematic more generally, I would like to know. My student did struggle with the sources a bit, so that is

2313:

I think in fact Buidhe is very familiar with this area of Knowledge (XXG). The Assyrian term is not an umbrella term for all these Christians neither is it an accepted term for Syriacs or Chaldeans. As far as i know I’m blocked because you kept reverting the article without providing any reliable

1142:

How can I create a page regarding Rawandiz massacre? It is necessary because 1) Rawandiz page is being vandalised 2) extermination of 80% of an area is notable enough to have its own page. I saw you on revision history of wiki pages about massacres and genocides and i need an experienced editor's

435:

There is a distinction between racial theories (theoretical understanding of who was designated an "inferior race") and racial policies (discriminatory policies based on such bogus theories). Policies were affected by pragmatism as well as race theory, for instance the nations that agreed to ally

3339:

hook. I've been working on it all night but this is all the information I could come up with. I think he sounds English, but I don't have any sources for his early life and most of his education. I think all those reviews should be deleted. Are you able to improve this for a double nom with your

2234:

I don't agree that you should be blocked at this point, but please remember to focus on the content, not the contributor: that is a key Knowledge (XXG) rule. If people are systematically changing names to "Assyrian" in a way that's not supported by the sources, that's a behavior issue, and their

2211:

it seems like you are looking for reasons to get me blocked by an administrator, since you were also reporting me for vandalism without any valid reason. It can clearly be seen that Assyrian propaganda is ruling on Knowledge (XXG) thus its nothing wrong to mention. I see both you and user Sargon

888:

Hi there. I do not at all object to your change/reversion of my edit to the L&L page, but I do not know for sure that the "conference papers" that the header mentions are the same thing as the series that NUP publishes. It's entirely possible, probable, that they're related, but, technically

767:

See my additions on your edits. I don't want us to end up again in no-man's-land as most of Dweller's page did ... either "Satisfactory" or "FAR". Most require only a diff that you have notified talk. But if you think an article can avoid FAR and is satisfactory (good enough), then just enter

2680:

somewhere). Documentation would be useful, certainly, but it's whether we decide to document it in its current form or work on a specification for a new tool with improvements (e.g. having a checkbox option to automatically correct the redirects post-swap). I'd certainly be willing to open a

1623:

one since this is a student contribution from a class that is still open, and the article may still be further expanded and improved. (We have a bot that automatically removes closed nominations, both closed as successful—at the time of promotion—and as unsuccessful: it runs every two hours.)

1290:

Can you follow the page? Ashuraya and his ip keep censoring the content with irrelevant excuses ("Russians betrayed Assyrians", etc.) According to the source, there was a massacre and there were perpetrators of this massacre who were named by the source. For some reason, it is being removed

2559:

Let's get to that later. For the moment, I just want to see whether this is an appropriate use of pageswap. If it's not then we need to look at what should have happened. If it is then I think the documentation needs to be provided so everyone can use it appropriately. But first things

1659:

Although there is a notice there that "You must not make more than one revert per 24 hours to this article" you have actually made multiple reverts under the guise of one edit (22:08, 29 November 2020)‎ in which you undid many edits contributed by another Knowledge (XXG) editor.

3020:. That was the only way I could tie the Wikidata dab page to the enwiki dab page, and then I was able to tie the mayor's page on Wikidata to his new base name title on enwiki. All that is supposed to happen automatically when we move pages, so I don't know what was done wrong. 2204:

that’s not how it works. Buidhe did repeat several times that the Assyrians Syriacs and Chaldeans should be listed as different groups. Yet you keep pushing your point of view without adding any sources to that these groups fall under the Assyrian umbrella, which isn’t even

1957:

a more accepted term in the historian world. I'm new to wikipedia and I see already a lot of (probably) Assyrian nationalists making disruptive POV edits on the page. Could you please revert the disruptive edits made by the users on that page! 20:56, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

4240:

has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

2030:

of Armenians, in the same event: persecution of Christians in the Ottoman Empire. It is argued by different historians and other books. Deportations of Kurds (1916–1934) was a population transfer event, not a genocidal event. Is there a reason why the edit been deleted?.

538:

as I stated in the nomination, I believe that fulfilling the directions for what the reviewer considers NPOV would itself create an issue of undue weight to the perspectives he wants to be elaborated on. The article already discusses prominent criticisms of the doctrine.

149:. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users. 2537:

I don't know what you want me to have done? Copy and paste moves are not allowed and there's no way to overwrite a redirect automatically. I could have requested deletion per WP:G6, but that seems like pointless waste of admin time, when there are many admin backlogs.

1009: 3279: 2157:

Hi, it’s unfortunate that you feel that way. If you disagree with me on a topic, then feel free to use my talk page and make an effort to discuss the topic before reporting it. My ethnic roots does not change anything as I can argue for my edits and defend them

1670:

The need to reach consensus does not mean that a user can unreasonably obstruct and/or impose a de facto censorship on contributions by other users unless it is reasonably proven that those contributions are in breach of Knowledge (XXG)'s editorial policies.

743:

if you will either enter comments on the article talk page, or ping still-active nominators, and then just include a diff on the URFA page for future reviewers to know who said what when and where, and be able to check what progress has been made. Follow

2943: 3414:

Thanks again for your note. As I mentioned on my talk page, I am very inactive on Knowledge (XXG) at this time. Yet, it is still good to know that what I done back many years ago is still being treated with a white-glove approach to things.

643: 3101: 2671:

To answer the question of where I learned about how to use PageSwap, through trial and error and probably too much goodwill from onlookers, but I got the hang of it through practice. In fact, there have been instances where I could have

3601:

are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it!

3715:

I'm not banned and in that RfC the consensus seems to be "option 2 or 3" which is "additional consideretions apply and reliable in the absense of generally reliable sources" just like Buidhe's closure notice says. You should let it

2182:

now accuses another user of editing in a certain way because of his ethnicity, and clearly has learnt nothing from his two-week ban. In my previous dealings with admins, that accusation is grounds for a more permanent block (see

3191: 978:. I found this to be a really fascinating topic, I had known intermarriage between Jews and Germans was illegal, but I had never thought about what had happened to those who were married before the Nuremberg Laws took effect. 2692:

redirect history is at the current redirect, so unless I've missed something I don't think there's an issue to rectify in this individual instance (see above for my comments on changes for long-term considerations). Cheers,

3915:

which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the

841: 1904: 3625:

I have a slight issue as I don't think 'additional considerations apply' is a fair summary as that it from option 3, not 2. Option 2 is reliable on a case by case. I think the conclusion needs a bit more

1820:

Just wanted to say kudos for getting this DYK approved. It's unusual to see something that striking make it onto the main page, and it passes the criterion 90% of DYKs fail of being actually interesting.

3010:. I clicked on the Wikidata link in the left sidebar and was taken to the dab page on Wikidata, which was still tied to the "John Fetterman" title. The mayor's page on Wikidata was still tied to the 1606: 1472: 1465: 825:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1339:

Thank you. I will do more research about this topic. Before that, the vandalism on this page should stop. I already reported Ashuraya145 on the page you suggested above (Sockpuppet investigations).

2457: 502: 2681:

community discussion to form a specification and contribute where I can to the development and documentation of such a tool. I do need to brush up on my MediaWiki as it has been a while though.

2328:

Generally you're supposed to AGF that a new user is not a sockpuppet until that has been shown to be the case. If you have evidence, go to SPI, otherwise drop it. My understanding is that the

2143:. It seems like the user is pushing an Assyrian POV since he states on his own userpage that he belongs to the Assyrian nation and thus is not neutral in making any edits regarding the topic. 2676:

and used PageSwap out of habit, but I now check the redirect histories to see if they're single-edit ones which can be overwritten (can't locate the diff, I think it'll be in the archives of

711: 146: 3023:

However, here is how I would have done it, so please compare this with what you did. First, I would have moved "John Fetterman (disambiguation)" to "Draft:Move/John Fetterman (politician)"

811: 1495: 3873:

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by

3272: 3259: 2769: 4249: 4306: 4300: 3082: 2106:

Schaller, Dominik J.; Zimmerer, Jürgen (2008). "Late Ottoman genocides: the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire and Young Turkish population and extermination policies—introduction".

701: 686: 580: 307: 4396: 2256:

True, you have a point there I’m new to Knowledge (XXG) so I’m trying to learn more about the rules etc. But even tho without providing reliable and variant sources your edit on

1612:

This is not how nominations should be closed, because simply deleting the transclusion means that the nomination is still considered open by various areas of the DYK processes.

3548: 2598:

I'm not sure that it was. It had other consequences. The RM did not mention swapping the page histories, and you are unable to clean this up even if you wished to do so.

4415:

if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

4325:

if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

3917: 3298:

if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

3210:

if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

2788:

if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

2476:

if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1550: 1546: 1601: 1597:

Buidhe, I've just been going through a list of untranscluded DYK nominations, and came across two that you simply removed from the Nominations page on November 21:

1113:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

2260:

was reverted back again by Sargon Gallu without providing any reliable arguments. So I conclude that Sargon Gallu his edit (not he as an user) is a pushed POV. :)

1691:

I noticed you recently removed a category describing a living person as a genocide denier. Category:Bosnian Genocide deniers is full of identical BLP violations.

3596: 3590: 1363:, for which I can help in a sandbox or draft to see how it would be like but I would need some outlined-structure and literature first. As I repeatedly wrote at 3534: 3527: 3479: 3472: 636: 627: 2332:/ the group claimed by Assyrian nationalism are both contested, and that should be reflected in our articles based on the preponderance of reliable sources. ( 1479: 1409: 4362: 4274: 3247: 3163: 2737: 2519:, you've said you're inactive but as the creator and as far as I can see the only maintainer of this script, your comments would be very helpful I think. 2425: 1923:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1876: 1796:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1746: 662:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

326:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

242:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

3689:

Please ignore the banned IP. And please read my comment again. Additional considerations apply is from option 3 and the consensus was for option 1 and 2.

1364: 1086:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply 2299:, you claim to understand your block and yet you argue your reporting for vandalism, which led to your block, was achieved 'without any valid reason'. 1565: 1534: 1520: 223: 3559:

within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.

2212:

Gallu removing other ethnic names and replacing them with Assyrian. So yes from both of your edits it seems that there is a political agenda behind.

1516: 220:"depicted LGBT rights activists as a foreign-backed threat to Polish children, religion, values, and the very biological continuation of the nation"? 118:. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. 3184: 3175: 2958: 2277:, I don't question your good intentions, but you seem to be unfamiliar with this area on Knowledge (XXG). It is a frequent target for users such as 1771: 1758: 2314:

sources, not because I vandalized the page since I provided sources and only added the name of the Syriac Orthodox Church in the Syriac language.

1709:, yeah, I would !vote to delete that category at CfD. It is indeed a magnet for BLP issues and is unlikely to be defining for hardly anyone. ( 1554: 1244: 716: 1356: 1191:

Thank you, it is being vandalised at the moment by a certain user and an ip (probably the same person). Where can i report those vandalisms?

436:

with Nazis were treated better. "Nazism and race" is too vague for the article content—which focuses on racial theories—as well as violating

3538: 4393:

argues that many 1920s German nationalists viewed genocide as the "cost of doing political and military business in the twentieth century"?

3717: 3645: 1298: 1276: 1228: 1150: 863: 161: 4412: 4322: 3295: 3207: 2785: 2473: 1920: 1793: 659: 323: 239: 2853: 1082:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge (XXG) is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

3551:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a

1897: 1888: 1676: 1542: 1371:

of favour of the aforementioned popular literature among the public but fringe within scholarship. The same thing is now happening at

975: 521:

Hi, the reviewer responded nearly 2 weeks ago. Are you returning to this nomination or should we mark it for closure as unsuccessful?

2293:

has already been blocked for two weeks for edit warring, and in my experience his accusations are grounds for a more long-term block.

2888:

anymore, having been renamed by Microsoft on November 10. It remaining where it is now would simply be factually incorrect. Cheers,

2563:

Apart from the fact that you didn't have the necessary authority to delete the target, was there any other reason to use pageswap?

3390:

Nice job finding more sources, and thanks for the DYK nomination. I'll see if I can add another sentence from all those reviews.

1667:

Knowledge (XXG) articles are no one's personal property, and such attitudes contradict with Knowledge (XXG)'s editorial policies.

3430:, I suspect that your original article was quite good, but it has not necessarily been updated with the FA criteria in mind... ( 3355:

Thanks for your work on Ihrig's article! No, I think he can get his own hook; I am not really a big fan of double noms at DYK. (

908:

as well. It wouldn't make sense to distribute open-access as that would probably ruin the market for the books of proceedings. (

171: 3640:

Apperantly this user voted for option 1 and still trying to use sherdog as a source instead of espn, fox etc. at pages such as

3496:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

1696: 1039: 859: 157: 3862: 2841:

Hi buidhe, when I first started Knowledge (XXG) you gave me a warm welcome. I'd like to return the favor with these cookies! ―

1372: 834: 4434: 3317: 2451: 3909:

who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by

2627:

for using PageSwap. The target history seems to be rooted in the standalone notability of the game, which was disputed at

4103: 3109: 1973: 1672: 414: 1570: 615: 279: 193: 3813: 3667: 3435: 3360: 2984: 2916: 2582: 2543: 2337: 2240: 2057: 1714: 1322: 1252: 1204: 1174: 913: 544: 445: 1368: 440:("avoid the use of "and" in ways that appear biased. For example, use Islamic terrorism, not "Islam and terrorism""). ( 3947: 2701: 2507: 2329: 1076: 1054: 846: 94: 89: 84: 72: 67: 3017: 2373:"Assyrian sect", "political agenda", bah. Sorry for not having done a full block initially, and thanks for the ping. 1996:

so that a page about the modern Arameans will be created besides the already existing page about the ancient people.

706: 4416: 4402: 4326: 4312: 3556: 3299: 3285: 3211: 3197: 2789: 2775: 2477: 2463: 2446: 2437: 1924: 1910: 1797: 1783: 1706: 1692: 663: 649: 493: 327: 313: 243: 229: 59: 38: 3523: 3468: 3227: 3139: 3053: 1849: 1317:, preferably providing additional sources to corroborate the account of Assyrian participation in the massacre. ( 1125: 3622: 1653: 4099: 3721: 3649: 1302: 1280: 1232: 1154: 705:

has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the

822: 111: 1166: 354:

Good morning. Please see the talk page for in praise of blood. I would be grateful for your view. Regards,

2848: 470: 422: 170:

If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so

127: 3662:

Your assumption is incorrect: Option 3 is "generally unreliable", not "reliable on a case by case basis". (

2908: 1961: 1294: 1272: 1224: 1146: 1114: 4155: 3943: 3607: 2966: 2696: 2643: 2628: 2392:

Hey buidhe, I don't think we agree on everything, but I think we can probably agree on what's going on at

2184: 2163: 1486: 1352: 778: 757: 3780:

Hi. Please can you read my comment again? The issue is that you have summarised by using option 3, not 2.

1992:

I think you do have a lot of knowledge on topics like these. I would ask you to join the RFC on the page

1619:; I have taken the liberty of rejecting the second of these nominations, but retaining and relisting the 1083: 739: 4367: 4279: 3585:

Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open

3252: 3168: 2758: 2749: 2742: 2577:

Yes, it was the quickest and easiest way to accomplish the move. Is there any other reason to use it? (

2430: 1881: 1751: 1629: 1380: 709:

guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at

620: 284: 198: 1165:

Sure, without registering an account you can't start a page in mainspace but you could make a draft at

4379:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 4291:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 4201: 3264:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 3180:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 2754:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 2442:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 1893:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 1763:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 632:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 296:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 210:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 4338: 4295: 4286: 3223: 3135: 3080:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at

3073: 3041: 2816: 2801: 2489: 1936: 1845: 1407:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at

1360: 1221:

Thank you. This user (Ashuraya145) uses ips to vandalise the page. Is there a place to report this?

1121: 985: 942: 894: 724: 500:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at

403: 359: 300: 291: 255: 2454:

ruled that "it is no longer considered to be necessary or appropriate" to criminalize homosexuality?

905: 805: 768:"Satisfactory" followed by your sig. If enough people agree, we'll move them off the list ... Bst, 4384: 4374: 3999: 3575: 3512: 3335: 3119: 2677: 2283:

who challenge the consensus in favour of their POV and are inevitably revealed as sockpuppets (see

1035: 2315: 2296: 2261: 2231: 2218: 2144: 1997: 1965: 1117:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 1072: 818: 4428: 4077: 4025: 3973: 3834: 3785: 3751: 3694: 3631: 3311: 2893: 2842: 2605:: Where is this use of pageswap documented? I'm eager to learn. Where did you find out about it? 2393: 2378: 2304: 2192: 2081: 2036: 2027: 2026:

genocides were a single event rather than separate events, and it sometimes includes the earlier

904:

AFAIK the conference papers are never distributed in any other form. Worldcat says the books are

466: 432: 418: 120: 3487: 961: 2623:

asked for my input on this one. From a look at all the page histories involved, I can't fault

4151: 4129: 4051: 3851: 3603: 3395: 3381: 3345: 3091: 3077: 2962: 2610: 2568: 2524: 2516: 2319: 2265: 2222: 2201: 2159: 2148: 2136: 2023: 2015: 2001: 1969: 1810: 1640: 1506: 1447: 1433: 1418: 1404: 1169:, which would later be moved to the article space. Be careful to cite only reliable sources. ( 1024: 769: 748: 676: 591: 565: 526: 511: 497: 393: 340: 3879:

who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to

2635: 1616: 1591: 1196: 830: 4181: 3809: 3663: 3623:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_318#RfC:_Sherdog.com

3431: 3356: 2980: 2912: 2578: 2539: 2401: 2333: 2236: 2115: 2053: 2049: 1710: 1625: 1376: 1318: 1248: 1200: 1170: 909: 853: 540: 441: 115: 104: 47: 17: 2907:

mind that former names are likely to be kept on Knowledge (XXG) as long as they remain the

2673: 1538: 1068: 833:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 826: 437: 4334: 3219: 2812: 2797: 2485: 1932: 1656:; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be. 980: 938: 890: 720: 410: 355: 251: 3483: 3376:

OK, but it's still a stub, and as I said, I'm unable to find more information about him.

3280:

Template:Did you know nominations/Senate Investigation into Motion Picture War Propaganda

1313:

Yes, I know that. It would be helpful if you continued this discussion on the talk page

3995: 3571: 3566: 3508: 3503: 3453: 3427: 3416: 3114: 3007: 2873: 2019: 2014:

Late Ottoman genocides, is a historiographical theory which claims that the concurrent

1029: 1008: 4399:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 4309:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 3282:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 3194:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 3027:. Then I would have moved "John Fetterman" to "John Fetterman (disambiguation)" again 2772:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 2460:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 1907:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 1537:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

646:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 310:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 226:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 153: 4424: 4073: 4021: 3969: 3830: 3805: 3781: 3747: 3690: 3659: 3627: 3307: 2903: 2889: 2374: 2364: 2300: 2213: 2208: 2188: 2173: 2077: 2045: 2032: 1620: 1314: 374: 3086:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

1780:

You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page

1413:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

506:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

4390: 4208: 4125: 4047: 3562: 3543: 3499: 3391: 3377: 3341: 3327: 3267: 3087: 2639: 2620: 2606: 2564: 2534: 2520: 1806: 1766: 1502: 1443: 1429: 1414: 672: 587: 561: 535: 522: 507: 389: 385: 336: 4438: 4342: 3838: 3824: 3789: 3755: 3725: 3698: 3678: 3653: 3635: 3611: 3579: 3516: 3458: 3446: 3421: 3399: 3385: 3371: 3349: 3321: 3143: 3123: 3102:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/Paper Mario: The Origami King/archive1

3095: 3056: 3031:. I would have then moved "John Fetterman (politician)" to "John Fetterman" again 2995: 2970: 2927: 2897: 2859: 2820: 2805: 2708: 2614: 2593: 2572: 2554: 2528: 2493: 2405: 2382: 2348: 2323: 2308: 2269: 2251: 2226: 2196: 2167: 2152: 2085: 2068: 2040: 2005: 1940: 1853: 1839: 1814: 1725: 1700: 1680: 1633: 1584: 1510: 1489: 1451: 1437: 1422: 1384: 1333: 1306: 1284: 1263: 1236: 1215: 1185: 1158: 1129: 1044: 991: 946: 924: 898: 867: 797: 782: 761: 728: 680: 595: 569: 555: 530: 515: 474: 456: 426: 397: 363: 344: 259: 165: 133: 3006:

Not sure what happened when you performed the series of page moves that involved

1895:... that at least 90 percent of intermarried spouses in Nazi Germany and Austria 937:

can sell a couple hundred copies of something you're simultaneously giving away.

4354: 4266: 4177: 3818: 3672: 3440: 3365: 3239: 3155: 2989: 2942: 2921: 2835: 2729: 2624: 2587: 2548: 2417: 2397: 2368: 2342: 2274: 2245: 2062: 1868: 1738: 1719: 1569:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

1327: 1257: 1209: 1179: 931: 918: 883: 607: 549: 450: 271: 185: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

644:

Template:Did you know nominations/Nazis and Nazi Collaborators (Punishment) Law

4406: 4316: 3289: 3201: 3068: 2779: 2763: 2647: 2632: 2467: 2119: 1914: 1787: 1395: 653: 640:

was intended to punish Holocaust survivors rather than Holocaust perpetrators?

488: 378: 317: 233: 3107:

If you can, could you do an image review for the featured article candidate

2961:

and the way you provided insight information of what happened back in 1915.

2513:

There doesn't seem to me to have been any need to swap the page histories.

2235:

ethnic identity or political opinion (Assyrian nationalism) is irrelevant. (

1827: 1400: 738:

Hey, Buidhe, thanks for all your work ! I removed your last few entries at

3478:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

3340:

current hook, or maybe you're planning an article about his Ataturk book?

1557:, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. 1541:, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a 1428:

Hi again. Can you take care of the inline cite for ALT0 hook fact please?

3192:

Template:Did you know nominations/Germany's role in the Armenian Genocide

2284: 1993: 1575: 586:

Hi again. The nominator has been waiting for your reply on her alt hook.

2876:

was closed prematurely. The question was not only whether to move it to

837:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3891:

who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to

3016:

redirect. The only way I could fix that was to restore the dab page at

815:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

215: 205: 3492: 1560:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

3644:

and edit warring for it. He should just let it go. It's already over.

3048: 1067:

Hello, Buidhe. It has been over six months since you last edited the

3899: 1905:

Template:Did you know nominations/Intermarried Jews in the Holocaust

3746:

Now that we can be sensible, please read my original comment again.

3555:

under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can

2396:, and if you want to escalate that to ANI, please ping me. Thanks, 417:? In what way do Nazi racial theories differ from their policies? 3182:... that the Bundestag apologized in 2016 for Imperial Germany's " 2257: 2140: 1954: 298:... that the British conspiracy-theory and Holocaust-denial group 1615:

The process on how failed nominations should be closed out is at

4236: 4221: 3911: 3893: 2881: 2877: 2642:

to do its thing. However, this was undone three years later at

1844:

This was a brilliant article and a fascinating read. Thank you.

850:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 373:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

139:

New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck

3887: 3875: 3641: 3233:

DYK for Senate Investigation into Motion Picture War Propaganda

840:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

3905: 3881: 2289: 2279: 2178: 1607:

Template:Did you know nominations/Meat and Livestock Australia

1473:

Template:Did you know nominations/Offending religious feelings

809:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

25: 3333:

Hi, I expanded this stub because I saw you linked it in your

1087: 4207: 4200: 3850: 2458:

Template:Did you know nominations/Living instrument doctrine

1525: 1482:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1464: 1059: 4299:

falsely claimed that "no Armenians were harmed" during the

4244:

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

2508:

Talk:Battleground: Ardennes#Requested move 18 November 2020

409:

Regarding your undiscussed move of the article above from

2884:. As I mentioned on the talk page, it is not called .NET 1496:

Template:Did you know nominations/Air pollution in Turkey

4248:

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself

4193: 4190: 4167: 4164: 4141: 4138: 4115: 4112: 4089: 4086: 4063: 4060: 4037: 4034: 4011: 4008: 3985: 3982: 3959: 3956: 3290:

Senate Investigation into Motion Picture War Propaganda

3260:

Senate Investigation into Motion Picture War Propaganda

3012: 2770:

Template:Did you know nominations/National indifference

2688:

article edit history is at the current article and the

2602: 1348: 1088: 821:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

744: 377:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 4307:

Template:Did you know nominations/FactCheckArmenia.com

4301:

deportation of Armenian intellectuals on 24 April 1915

1501:

Hi, I offered a new hook. Could you review it please?

702:

Category:Jewish escapees from Nazi concentration camps

687:

Category:Jewish escapees from Nazi concentration camps

581:

Template:Did you know nominations/Die Schutzbefohlenen

308:

Template:Did you know nominations/Keep Talking (group)

4397:

Template:Did you know nominations/Justifying Genocide

2872:

It seems to me that the requested move discussion on

1478:

Message added 10:54, 27 November 2020 (UTC). You can

601:

DYK for Nazis and Nazi Collaborators (Punishment) Law

147:

RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck

4395: