5384:
should be taken not to give the impression that there is an officially defined unparished area with the name and boundaries of the pre-1974 urban district or borough. As such, it is best not to mention unparished areas in the lead.". Yes stating such a settlement is now in the unparished area of X gives the impression that there is an "official" unparished area but given
Stortford made mention of Sutton in Ashfield district having no successor parish and becoming an unparished area. Yes I understand how Stortford put it gives less of the impression of an "official" unparished area than the way I was putting it but as mentioned it doesn't seem there was a consensus/the intention was to not mention them at all. You appear to be saying that they suddenly shouldn't be mentioned despite the guidance apparently saying they can though as mentioned its not clear if that refers to the likes of
627:
They'd confused the old church with the 1823 replacement, entirely failed to make incoming links which would have led them to a list of Grade II listed buildings that provides a good referenced summary of the building, and in general made very poor use of the sources they did cite. I have the impression they fill out the infobox but then are stumped as to how to write prose. I looked at their other article creations at the time and it's a small group of very poor stubs on listed churches that desperately need extensive work plus again, integration into the encyclopaedia. (Personal aside: I avoid working on church articles. But it looks as if I have a duty to
Knowledge (XXG) to fix these up because they are so poor. This is making me quite miserable. End of aside.) Then I saw what PamD has highlighted above,
631:. After all our attempts to explain how to do what the editor wants to do. I slept on whether to make a boomerang section of the AN/I, also re-raising their personalised responses to criticism. When I got up, I found they've responded to PamD and that made me aware of this talk page section. So, last-ditch ... can you throw any light on the back story here, such as past productive work in collaboration with you as they stated at AN/I, and whether their accusations about Esemgee in the AN/I refer to a previous dust-up? And more importantly, as someone close to them, can you offer them any specific advice that would help them understand what the problems are with their editing and how to avoid them? We've reached the last ditch here, I fear.
723:
copy the URL from your browser address bar. There's a "diff" template, but just copying the URLs woriks just as well. Or (especially if you can't use that method because you are on a mobile interface) go to either the talk page or its archive, as appropriate, then make a
Wikilink adding the section title after "#". Like here, you would link to this section by ]). Unfortunately, that earlier church article proves my point. It remains poorly formatted, with the footnote numbers appearing in the ref section instead of in the text, despite your having created it in December 2020. It's a Grade I listed building (!) - mentioned nowhere in the text.
931:
faith that they're there in
Pevsner, but it's not uncommon for people to misread or misinterpret his heavily abbreviated listings (or for Pevsner to have something wrong; he attributes the east end of St Augustine's Church, Rugeley simply to "Pearson", and only lists one Pearson, who'd died by then; other sources specify his son). I looked for alternative sources but couldn't find any, which for a Grade I building is sad. Anyway, as I say, I really don't like to work on churches, so I mostly hope the collective further fixes these.
1238:
in the City of Milton Keynes UA. And Tring is a town in
Buckinghamshire, in the Buckinghamshire Council UA. The apparent repetition in the last case is an irritation but that's life. Local loyalties are complicated: I doubt that there are many people who say that they are from Middlesex rather than London but I wouldn't be so sure about Surrey and Essex. This is not about putting (arbitrarily defined) historic counties on a pedestal, just the geographic equivalent of
2932:. Can I ask if thereâs guidance/policy on this? Iâve not used them in the Welsh Lists Iâve done, since they drew some criticism at FLC. One editor compared them to having a tag saying âMore textâ! Youâll see it was discussed on the article Talkpage, and the consensus was they were rather âclutteryâ, so Iâve deliberately taken them out. Obviously, if thereâs a wider consensus to have them, or itâs policy to do so, I wouldnât want to go against that. All the best.
4186:. As a reader I find redirects from incorrect capitalizations annoying when they show up in the search suggestions instead of the correct version. From an editor's prospective these redirects are inconvenient. There is no reason to have a small number of redirects that are very unlikely to be useful to our readers due to the incorrect capitalization of Knowledge (XXG) qualifiers that the search corrects anyway so I can't see why we need them.
1619:
1126:) who is dedicated to chasing up and correcting abuse of "comprised", but they wouldn't have spotted this one because of the typo. On the links, as you say, you check after linking. Someone else obviously doesn't: why not? (There's a useful gadget I've got installed which colours links to show their status, so that those two leapt out at me as green shaded which shows a circular link: would be useful for other editors to install this too.)
199:
326:. I appreciate you're efforts in fixing problems with their work but if they're really unhappy with you on their talk page then it is probably a good idea to do this. If there are enough problems someone else will probably end up dealing with it, thanks. So yes the fact I've suggested a topic ban isn't necessarily an indication you're done anything wrong but rather to deal with a dispute that has been going on for a while.
17:
3758:
2319:
2276:
2593:
5474:
5940:
5629:
4357:
2127:
1118:
was at it). Now the census data would be a really constructive project for someone: to go through the dead links to 2011 census and fix by using NOMIS2011. There are thousands. (Do we know whether ONS or NOMIS ever plan to provide the equivalent parish-level data for 2021, so that we can then embark on the project of updating every parish/settlement with some brand new NOMIS2021 template?)
5050:
normally I add the population at the most recent census and when the parish was abolished and where it went to. With areas that ended up in unparished areas I tend to just put the individual unparished area but I agree this may suggest it has an official name/boundary so it may be better to state that the urban district the parish was in was abolished and no successor parish was formed.
650:, if I may chime in on your comment? I have Crouch, Swale talkpage on my watchlist to mostly discuss geography contributions and so. I wanted to chime in on your comment about Esemgee and my previous dust up with them? Well I can share with you a couple of incidences with them I had and so. I have no idea fully how to add links to them but I will do my best to share them. We clashed on
2469:
2187:
2997:
5995:
5858:
5423:
1696:
3596:, so you cannot just copy chunks of one article, or refs, into another article unless you have verified the content and the sources for yourself. "Access-date" means "date I have seen this material online and confirm that it supports the content I am using it to support". You should not be adding content to an article unless you have seen the source for yourself.
4416:
3866:. I am new to Knowledge (XXG) - so still discovering the best way to do things. Could you please explain your message and what I need to do? (I think you are saying that PROD is not appropriate and I ought to trigger abother AFD process. But I am not sure if that is what you are saying. And I am not sure how to do it). Thanks - Newhaven lad
671:" and " I am also persona non grata so I now avoid him as I really can't be bothered anymore." Their tone and approach have caused me to clash with them and I rather spend my time talking with editors who can understand me and help me. Not go on a whim to destroy me at every turn and ignore the positives I have bought to this encyclopedia like the
4657:
very clear that there is and was no such thing as the "unparished area of
Leatherhead" - there is simply nothing to debate here. It really does seem that you do not understand what an unparished area is and (more importantly) what it is not. Please stop including information about named unparished areas in Knowledge (XXG) articles.
4156:"technical" portions. The only other argument I recall seeing is that it makes things harder for some tools, but we should always alter our tools to deal with the encyclopaedia as it is rather than alter then encyclopaedia to make life easier for tool authors/maintainers (unless such changes are truly invisible to readers).
4038:, and I'd be glad to respect the result of a discussion with more experienced admins, but I don't see it fitting under any of our current deletion rationales without an expansion or more details being added to them. Note that this exact redirect (which was created after the discussion took place) was discussed with @
732:
West Yorks. I appreciate your creating missing articles. But didn't you use "preview" to see how they displayed on the page? Why didn't you use the sources to describe the buildings in the body of the article? Why didn't you look for the official listing page, in this case at least? These things I do not understand.
3709:
aren't primary by usage. The other things I commonly use are Google (main) which is also useful for usage but can be biased due to location, Images which tends to be less biased but can overly show PTMs (like
Lincoln mainly shows Abraham Lincoln for example) and Books which can show long-term significance.
5247:
The official unparished area is the one we need to be concerned with. We can't invent our own unparished areas or use unoffical definitions. As the guidance says (and we have discussed above) "Care should be taken not to give the impression that there is an officially defined unparished area with the
5156:
It's good that this article does not explicitly mention the "unparished area of Sutton in
Ashfield". This is the final sentence of the relevant paragraph, which says: "No successor parish was created for the former urban district and so it became an unparished area." The problem comes with the second
4958:
The wording of the Skegby article does arguably conflict with the guidance but I don't think the consensus was not to do this, the consensus was that they don't belong in the lead and that we need to be careful about how we word things. I think rather we may need to reword the guidance, I don't think
4656:
BMD was wrong when it listed "the individual unparished areas" - it has since improved the way that is displays this information (and it no longer supports
Skinsmoke's interpretation that you seem determined to cling to - despite being told serveral times that this is wrong). The quote above makes it
4013:
or any of the other 220,510 DAB pages. I agree G4 doesn't apply because the redirect wasn't nominated though it was discussed when (at that time) it didn't exist but I think R3 applies and the consensus there supports deleting and yes there hasn't been consensus to create a specific criteria for such
2073:
Yes they can be tagged with R with possibilities but when it comes down to district councils I'd generally avoid creating separate articles unless there is a need in terms of article size etc. Generally its best to cover the district an its council in 1 place. There is a major exception to this, when
1811:
is a nice, friendly editor! Links to DABs are a common mistake when one first starts editing. Received a few of the the Talk page DAB messages at first but fairly quickly learnt to check each
Wikilink immediately after publishing and corrected any incorrect links post-haste. Now I normally check each
4718:
This is getting very tedious. You should not write "the unparished area of Leatherhead" and you should not write "the unparished area of Mole Valley". As you have put it, these statements are "meaningless". They are meaningless because unparished areas are not formally defined. They do not exist in
4266:
would be useful but every other wouldn't be or don't need to exist. I know you have said something like you aren't interested in getting them created but if you think we should keep some we should do that for all as all DABs are the same and function in the same way so there is no merits to consider
3708:
Pageviews are the main way of determining if something is primary by usage as it shows how many people read the relevant articles, obviously it doesn't show what terms people use to get there but if you have "Foo (film)" and "Foo (album)" and both get a similar number of views it probably shows they
3218:
There has been debate about notability, see the page history, you merged it with the reason "single-line unreferenced referenced stub, not edited for years" and it was restored with a PROD and then redirected again, I then restored it with a ref meaning you're merge reason no longer applied. I'm not
1499:
Made a change, agree the photos were ugly but this one has more vibrant colours. Think the skyline is the only drawback but the rest is really vibrant and light. Anyway I have done best I can to make them less clunky portrait and landscape but not gonna lie. Might change the cathedral photo as it is
1237:
To illustrate, let's start with an easy one: Ampthill is a town in Bedfordshire, in the Mid-Bedfordshire district/UA. Easy because when Bedfordshire was divided, none of the parts retained the name. Nevertheless, Ampthill is unambiguously in Bedfordshire. Equally, Olney is a town in Buckinghamshire,
1233:
I disagree though on the ceremonial county though. This is because the only Buckinghamshire that has legal existence is the ceremonial county and it is just irritating to readers to add a redundant qualification. The only time qualification is required is when, well, it is required: Slough is a town
1195:
to just omit the unitary district and just say "Tring is a town and civil parish in the county of Buckinghamshire, England". So yes I don't think the word "district" is problematic, legally a unitary authority area is a non-metropolitan county as well as being a non-metropolitan district but I think
1117:
Of course I've fixed that rubbish, having spotted it. The rest of the article was quite a shambles, including longstanding duplicated nonsense by an IP! And it had links to the old census database, so I've fixed that. (And emailed the clerk to the parish council about a typo on their website while I
5262:
The accepted definition for unparished areas does appear to be the pre 1974 UD. I agree we need to be careful about how we word it but stating that a former UD became an unparished area doesn't seem against the guidance. As noted UKBMD did formerly lists such individual unparished areas. I think we
4585:
The consensus was that unparished areas generally shouldn't be mentioned in the lead. Yes there may be no "formal" boundary but I thought the general rule was that such individual unparished areas should normally be mentioned even if they form part of a wider "unparished part" of a modern district.
3442:
Why bother adding a ref if it's already dead? You seem to have blindly copied the 2011 census figure, complete with a 2015 access-date, although we know the "neighbourhood statistics" refs are all dead. Surely if you add a ref you check that it works, and fix it if it doesn't? Or perhaps you don't,
3346:
says "The borough contains three civil parishes within its boundaries." (under "Neighbourhoods") but also "Four parishesâSwindon Village, Up Hatherley, Leckhampton and Prestburyâwere added to the borough of Cheltenham from the borough of Tewkesbury in 1991." (under "Administrative history") and the
2372:
As with most matters there is always a civil middle ground and sure - I have no interest in edit wars and I was crystal clear that I did think my edits - pushed the 'consensus boundaries' - but no one reacted negatively - until this day. There are sections in the articles talk section and there was
1744:
If an editor, who has previously been told about the helpful gadget which highlights links to dab pages in orange, adds a link to a dab page, is alerted by a bot, and ignores that message, does it mean that they can't work out how to fix it, that they just don't care about the encyclopedia, or that
880:
West Riding book split it into North and South right between Morley and Batley, and so while I have the Leeds/Bradford volume sitting beside me on interlibrary loan, I can't get access to the Sheffield volume either on Google Books or in the flesh, and given his repetitive vocabulary I was lucky to
722:
Thanks, DragonofBatley. That saves some searching. (For reference, go to the history page for whatever talk page or article page you want to reference, click on either "prev" for a particular edit or the time-and-date stamp just to the right of it for the state of the page at a particular time, and
5548:
which also suggests it is a plausible target. It seems there is consensus that the song is primary for the upper case version but not for the lower case version. However I'm not sure if "Psychological stress" is really a likely search term even for lower case so it might be worth a RFD which I can
5033:
OK, so we need to go back a step. You have already agreed that the 1972 act "did not create named unparished areas corresponding to the pre-1974 districts". Do you agree that writing "unparished area of " or " unparished area" in an article gives "the impression that there is an officially defined
4903:
I'm not sure on this, indeed it suggests we should treat both Dorking and Leatherhead as a single unparished area. As I've noted I don't think that was the intention as the OP doesn't appear to have used this and instead as with Skegby made reference to the pre 1974 district being abolished and no
4056:
I'm not immediately certain which redirect this discussion relates to, but "(Disambiguation)" is a plausible search term so definitely not speediable. I don't advocate creating them as a matter of routine, but if they are created that indicates someone found it useful and as there is no benefit at
1778:
On second thoughts, I've fixed this "quadruple checked" link, as I care enough about the encyclopedia. But I'm genuinely puzzled here. Editors should check al links they create. Then, the gadget means that if you even skim quickly through the edit you see the link in orange - though perhaps not on
1372:
So what I would suggest is (1) go to the talk pages of Redditch, Gosport and Newcastle upon Tyne and post you're plans to split (or tag the articles with {{split|Article 1|date=July 2023}}) and wait 2 weeks to see if there are any objections or otherwise if there is a consensus and then split. The
2428:
I do think this article could be improved upon - I sensed there was a broader initiative by other 'newer' editors - and perhaps should not have made the strident changes - clearly reversion is a click away - so I hope folks do not think I have any agenda - I was a tad shocked that anyone actually
2404:
I think the thing we need to try to encourage DragonofBatley to think about is partial reverts so I'd perhaps suggest what changes should be retained on the talk page. I think the problem was with removing the ceremonial county but it would be better for DragonofBatley to just restore that rather
1158:
As this seems to your speciality, perhaps you might advise? Bucks used to have five districts: MK, Aylesbury Vale, etc. First MK left and eventually became a UA. In 2020, all the remaining district councils were wound up and a single Buckinghamshire Council UA created. So here's the question: the
731:
as a reference, from which I learn it's 15th-century with 13th-century bits. Other than "Built in 1485", our article doesn't say a single thing about the building in its text, and the infobox describes it simply as Gothic Revival. At least it's linked at the 2 lists of Grade I listed buildings in
5383:
The discussion and guidance does say "It may be appropriate to mention in a governance section on the pages for those settlements that they are now an unparished area, but this information is best presented alongside discussion on the current administrative arrangements for that settlement. Care
930:
Too much risk of perpetuating misunderstandings and other inaccuracies. As it is, I did lean a bit on the summary at All Saints' (including for key words to crack the snippet view), but the 1485 estimate, the 13th-century elements, and the 19th-century renovation are unsourced. I'm assuming good
626:
Crouch, Swale, I don't believe we know each other, but since DragonofBatley said they have worked a lot with you before, and you rose to their defence at AN/I, a bit of a heads up ... I've spent some time fixing up the church article that was highlighted at AN/I by Esemgee, and it was very bad.
401:
City Population seems to use the most recent estimate/census for this meaning that if a BUA had say a population of 512 in the 2020 estimate but only 493 in the 2021 census then when City Population updates to the 2021 census (which happened around November 2022) then it will disappear from City
5049:
Yes I agree, as I said the "Dorking" and "Leatherhead" unparished areas resulted from the districts being abolished and no successor parish. I agree the way I wrote it may well give that impression and the way Skegby was changed to avoids this. When I've added the information on former parishes
1341:
Cheltenham, Gloucester, Oxford and Southend-on-Sea are partly parished, Cheltenham had boundary changes in 1974 but the other 3 didn't though they do now contain parishes, Gloucester because of a later boundary change and Oxford got 3 from boundary chages and 1 from the existing area. Juts like
406:
then some may disappear. All that's normally important is that the URL worked at the time the content was added though I'd go further to say it may be fine if someone remembers the content of a URL which stopped working before being added to Knowledge (XXG) though this should probably be noted.
1096:
It looks like those 2 issues have been fixed by you, the 1st is a small grammatical error which can easily be fixed and just moved on with unless the same grammatical error is happening frequently in which case it can be pointed out what the correct grammar is. The 2nd is a very minor problem,
5360:
writing to you: "there is a limit to how much time can be given to assist one person before good will and patience starts to wear out... the impression that your focus is on yourself rather than the project and those others who volunteer here.... You have over the years taken up a deal of my
3195:
I really don't understand why you have recreated this article. An explanation of what a name means is not an indication of notability. Its just a part of Thornhill, not a separate place or even a civil parish. The reference can be transferred to the Thornhill article which could and should be
4740:
There was a consensus that unparished areas can still be discussed in articles though the guidance isn't clear about if this is only for the settlements that were districts or other settlements that are/were within them but indeed in Skegby the fact Sutton in Ashfield UD became unparished is
4647:
Unparished areas by definition are not administrative areas and do not have official names. Where abolished urban districts or boroughs within the same modern district adjoin, there is no "unparished area boundary" between them - for example whilst Dorking and Leatherhead were separate urban
4546:
Unparished areas by definition are not administrative areas and do not have official names. Where abolished urban districts or boroughs within the same modern district adjoin, there is no "unparished area boundary" between them - for example whilst Dorking and Leatherhead were separate urban
4224:
From a reader perspective I don't care whether I arrive at the page I want directly or via a redirect. I do care that I arrive at a page inviting me to create an article and/or search instead of the page I wanted. Search suggestions are only available for a subset of the ways people look for
1204:
is a village and former civil parish in the Thurrock district, in the ceremonial county of Essex, England" rather than "West Tilbury is a village and former civil parish in the Thurrock district, in the county of Essex, England" which wouldn't make clear its only in the ceremonial county not
1121:
The difference between "compromised" and "comprised" is not a "small grammatical error" but either carelessness or a bad spellchecker, and shows lack of checking (or, if checked and thought OK, then ignorance). The difference between "comprised" and "composed" is ignorance: there's an editor
2955:
5226:
Not an "official" one but one that resulted from the abolition. As noted the person who proposed the changes wrote this so it doesn't appear it was the intention to remove individual unparished areas completely just to be careful about how we word it which the current wording does seem to.
4155:
You can certainly argue that, but as I (and many others) disagree it's very clearly not something suitable for speedy deletion. From a reader's perspective there is no difference between using a different capitalisation to the one we have chosen (sometimes arbitrarily) in the "generic" and
5340:
article has been improved. We now have a good paragraph that describes the abolition of the relevant civil parish, without diving off into original research. I expect you to use this form of words in articles (adapted as appropriate with no mention of unparished areas whatsoever) going
4112:
noted in the RFD there is no particular reason these should be treated any differently to the other DABs and that miscapitalisations may be useful but even that is applicable to the specific part of the title, "Foo (bar)", and not the generic or technical portion, "Foo (bar)".
667:) 09:39, 2 September 2021 (UTC)", "I am assuming nothing, I am stating a fact. It is you who need to take advice from editors like Noswall59 who have experience of writing good articles not me who needs to be "more on the fence". I think I have corrected your edits before now.
1209:
we would say "Maldon is a town and civil parish in the Maldon district, in the county of Essex, England" not "Maldon is a town and civil parish in the Maldon district, in the ceremonial county of Essex, England" since that would suggest Maldon district was a unitary district.
1373:
previous problems is you sometimes don't appear to understand the criteria we use for splitting/merging and you don't discuss on the talk page. If you discuss the 3 I have suggested you should have less problems with them being reverted or otherwise complained about, thanks.
4877:
Great. We both agree that the Leatherhead Urban District is a pre-1974 district that was abolished under the Local Government Act 1972, so I won't ask you to confirm this. You also agree that the same act did not create named unparished areas corresponding to the pre-1974
3620:
This would fall under the 1st option and I attributed the content in my edit summary which seems to be enough given the content was minor though I admit I have moved larger amounts of content before and only used edit summaries when I could also have used the template.
290:. I'd have pointed it out helpfully on their talk page, but had better not right now. But if they don't know how to find archived files, they risk damaging the encyclopedia by removing other editors' work, or making it seem unsourced. Thanks for any help you can give.
3548:
I don't think we should add any reference without checking, ourself, that it supports the content, and updating to the date we have added it. You are responsible for references you add, and it doesn't make sense to add a reference which you already know doesn't work.
3527:
Yes the ref was moved from the other article with a 2015 access date which seems correct, when moving content from another Knowledge (XXG) article I think we would keep the access date for when the content was added to the other article even if the URL is today dead.
1881:
Oh sorry, didn't know this was about me until now. Bit shocked I was being discussed without being tagged in. What orange links? I've gone back and fixed red links where possible or left them unlinked. Sorry Crouch, wasn't aware I was being discussed in all honesty.
2879:
Hi Crouch been a while. How you doing? Just wondering if you think Cheltenham might qualify for a split for both the borough and town because it contain three civil parishes and might qualify for splitting for one borough and the main settlement? What do you think?
4804:
where it does make reference to the individual unparished areas. While I agree that the Local Government Act 1972 didn't explicitly create the unparished area of "Dorking" and the unparished area of "Leatherhead" it did abolish both district and didn't establish
1163:
article, typically to refer to the UAs. Is it really worth the effort to clear them out? Is the word significantly problematic? What would make it painful is that we don't have a word (AFAIK) to use for the area administered by a UA, as opposed to the UA itself.
1403:
strikes me as ugly, with 5 images, one of which occupies half the area. I can't find any guidelines on how to create collages, and this isn't technically covered by the current discussion, which is about infoboxes for ceremonial counties. There is nothing at
273:
Hallo Crouch, you said "I'd also be fine if both users can contact me if they really do need to say something about/to the other.", so perhaps you could explain to DoB how to look for archived pages at the Wayback Machine / Internet Archive. They have today
5349:
I'm sure that you will respond to this message by protesting how you still feel that some of Skinsmoke's ideas are justified. But I am not interested. We have been over this ground several times and I will not be commenting further. I regard this matter as
654:
over my removal of (outdated information which was years old and written in present tense) but I got a range of assumptions made and was told I was wrong. Quotes like "I agree with Noswall, the statistics should be in the article, it might be unhelpful to
767:): so sad because there is a wonderful gadget which makes it easy to stop yourself from doing this, to which I alerted them just recently. They have chosen not to use that useful tool, trusting their own careful editing to avoid making this basic mistake.
4462:
just a simple C&P error or similar? Unless I am going mad, or it is another one with the same name, they're nowhere near each other. I have changed it to Rothley but please tell me if I am barking up the wrong tree here! Hope you are well, Cheers
3419:
5296:
article. I will leave a note on his talk page later today and will invite you to join that discussion. In the meantime, I am grateful to you for agreeing that you will not use the wording "unparished area of " or " unparished area" in articles.
3953:
I've declined your R3 / replaced with a G4 request, as I don't believe the page qualifies for speedy deletion under either rationale. Capitalization changes at the beginning of words, or disambiguators, are not implausible typos. Regarding the
2361:
Greetings - I noted you likely are much more of a stakeholder in the Blackpool article - I did make many bold and strident changes - and I documented them as such in the audit trail of the edits - I do apologize - all edits made in good faith.
4678:
Although the position of unparished areas being part of a wider district's unparished area was part of the proposal/consensus it doesn't seem like stating that they are part of the modern unparished area's district has ever been used by the
3992:
I think it does qualify as a recently created misnomer. As said on the talk page and RFD redirects from other capitalizations can be helpful if they are part of the title without the qualifier. There is no more reason to have a redirect at
699:
among other articles that never existed but they get overlooked for minor faults. All negatives and no positives from any editors but a few. So If I was able to briefly elaborate, hopefully I given you some grounds to see my point of view.
1097:
normally with parishes named "X and Y" we have articles on "X" and "Y" and I've made similar links only to check after linking and discover the title redirects back to the linked page and then removed the link. Is everything else fine?
3082:
Hello, it's me, N1TH Music, I think it's high time I helped you work on the missing parishes project you've got going, but I forgot where to find the page which has the list of all the missing ones, could you please inform me, thanks.
597:
template. This is pure accidental but avoidable damage to the encyclopedia through misunderstanding how the template works and failure to check after an edit that it has produced the intended effect. What can be done? My posting about
4057:
all to deletion, deleting them is a small net negative to the project. Something like "(DIsambiguation)" on the other hand is not a plausible and would be eligible for R3 (assuming the other requirements of that criterion are met).
1190:
is a town and civil parish in the Buckinghamshire district, in the ceremonial county of Buckinghamshire, England" but indeed "unitary authority area" or "unitary district" may be better or perhaps (especially given we don't have
3958:, that's not particularly relevant given that this redirect was not included in that batch. To be clear, that batch of nominations cannot be used as the rationale for pages that were not included in that batch and I agree with @
4133:
Never the less, it doesn't fit the scope of any of our current CSD criterion, so I don't think debating it is particularly relevant here. If you want it included and to be CSD-able, then you need to make a proposal for such.
3641:
I think it does readers, and your editing reputation, a diservice when you introduce material sourced to a dead link, especially when you know how to find a usable source instead. Copying a useless reference is pointless.
857:) I've noted a few others tweaking and fixing after DragonofBatley's edits. And I want to assure you that by posting here, I'm not implying any responsibility on your part at all. I guessed right, you have a life off-wiki
4562:
yesterday, that the "unparished area of Leatherhead" and the "unparished area of Staines" exist or have existed. I very strongly suggest that you do not add any more information on unparished areas to the encyclopedia.
3263:
But another user has already restored it with the reason "A 17 years old stub should not be redirected (removed) without consensus." and I also restored it with a source. That seems to make it controversial enough per
5157:
half, which could be read (as you have already noted) that there is or was such a thing as the "unparished area of Sutton in Ashfield", when in fact it should simply indicate that Skegby is not part of a civil parish.
524:
calls it a village. I hope someone else will have the page on their watchlist and pick this up ... but I'm losing faith in other people's watchlists, so many awful edits go uncorrected. (Not DoB's, but ones like the
2638:
4308:
I don't advocate creating them as a matter of routine, but if they are created that indicates someone found it useful and as there is no benefit at all to deletion, deleting them is a small net negative to the
3168:
as although they are technically different legal entities they cover/covered the same area, have very similar names and have similar functions, the only difference is the newer also has the district functions.
5283:
This is just wrong: "The accepted definition for unparished areas does appear to be the pre 1974 UD." This is also wrong: "stating that a former UD became an unparished area doesn't seem against the guidance."
993:
Thanks, it does have similar boundaries to the settlement but it does contain 2 parishes and it did experience significant boundary changes in 1974 so yes I'd say splitting is marginally a good idea. Probably
4725:
has said "unparished areas - they are not things in their own right, but are rather the absence of other things". By trying to give these areas a name, you are making them sound official, when they are not.
469:
is a village not a town, despite the text in the article which says it is a long-established market town although often referred to as a village. It has a Town Hall. I can see no mention of "village" on the
4881:
Do you agree that the wording "Care should be taken not to give the impression that there is an officially defined unparished area with the name and boundaries of the pre-1974 urban district or borough" in
2929:
4932:
4883:
4641:
4535:
3052:
3900:
2048:. As youâve done some work in the topic area Iâm therefore wondering if youâd mind helping me out with this subject. (Please feel free to disregard the question if you donât feel comfortable answering.)
5961:
In accordance with our policy that Knowledge (XXG) is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can
5650:
In accordance with our policy that Knowledge (XXG) is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can
4378:
In accordance with our policy that Knowledge (XXG) is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can
5345:
I would note that the consensus is further from your own position than the compromise paragraph that I proposed above â there is a lesson in there for you, but I doubt very much that you will learn it.
1450:, if its excessive we could just have 1 image instead of 5 but indeed perhaps further discussion is needed on this for the project in general as it would likely apply to all topics not just UK places.
3422:
in 2018 using the longer name but I'm unable to find any other sources for a rename so we'll probably just have to go with 2019 for the rename since as you say the 2011 census uses the shorter name.
2622:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1330:
Derby, Lincoln, Norwich and Nottingham have similar boundaries, are unparished and didn't have any major changes in 1974 so I'd probably stay away from then at least for now. Ipswich is similar but
1064:
uses "compromised" where "comprised" was probably intended, and "composed" would have been correct. As well as linking two village names which are redirects back to this article. Quadruply checked?
1196:
most people who know/care about the difference between Buckinghamshire, the ceremonial county and Buckinghamshire, the unitary district will call the former a county and the latter a district. Per
968:. Would you be able to check it out and tell me if it meets Wiki standards for seperation as I found two different population figures for both the main city and district as well as the urban area.
2773:
1849:
things don't have to be perfect. That said due to the orange links and the fact its tagged "Disambiguation links added" in the page history it should be easy to avoid adding disambiguation links.
1338:
as the district survived the 1974 changes. Gosport didn't have changes in 1974 and doesn't have parishes but does cover a significantly larger area than the settlement so I'd consider splitting.
4586:
Unfortunately UKBMD has stopped listing the individual unparished areas but it still mentions the towns in the wider unparished areas. I'd note that with Ashtead it appears that it was part of
5163:"In 1951 (or whatever the last census available is), the Civil Parish of X had a population of 9876. Y Urban District was abolished in 1974 to become part of the new district/borough of Z. No
2089:
separate articles should exist. For London borough, metropolitan and unitary district councils I'd generally say they don't need separate articles but most exist. When parish councils if like
1816:
put on another editor's Talk page I now have the "orange" alerts activated as a further safeguard - this also identifies such errors while reading an article, allowing correction to be made.
4796:
I agree it doesn't support this today but it used to namely when I set up the unparished categories. Unfortunately the Wayback Machine doesn't show it for Surrey Mid Eastern but it does for
3443:
and the people who turned down your appeal know it. And although I gave you the source, above, you didn't mention that the area of the parish was increased susbtantially, not just a rename.
4927:
The Skegby article does not explicitly say the "unparished area of Sutton in Ashfield", so it is not directly relevant to the point that I am making here. In my opinion, the wording in the
2607:
3134:
Hi Crouch, Swale hope your doing okay. Was just wondering without seemingly canvassing. Do you think Buckinghamshire has possible grounds for a unitary area article similar to Shropshire?
3907:
probably can't use PROD though it was closed as procedural keep its probably best to start a new AFD especially given schools have been controversial to delete anyway. You need to follow
2425:
One might ask - why my interest? - I recall many decades ago vacations in this town - my parents emigrated and now I am old and looking back to the past - too much time/nostalgia perhaps.
5286:
We are beginning to go round in circles here - you are rowing back on the very clear yes/no answers which you gave earlier in this discussion. I think the thing to do now is to ask for
5263:
need to be careful about how we word things that don't have official definitions but I don't think its prohibited to use such things as long as we be careful about how we word things.
3955:
5606:
31:
21:
4435:
5248:
name and boundaries of the pre-1974 urban district or borough." Do you agree that we need should use official definitions only as defined by UK government legislation - yes or no.
4312:
1907:
for changing you're preferences to show disambiguation links as orange so that when you pres "show preview" you can see if there are disambiguation links before you save changes.
819:
Sorry I've been away for a few days, I've checked the above articles and it looks like the problems listed above have been fixed though I did also make some formatting fixes with
3288:
The other user wanted to restore it to delete it. A name on a map does not make a place notable. I don't know where you got that idea. I don't think you understand notability.
3036:
851:! The AN/I section was closed and has now been archived, but I still have concerns. (And have 2 volumes of Pevsner on the way by interlibrary loan so I can fix the churches.
3380:
1186:
I think the usage of the word "district" if fine though "unitary authority area" or "unitary district" may be better for clarity. Normally in the lead I use something like "
4687:. I don't think it was ever intended for us to simply say that such place is in the unparished area of "Mole Valley". Such a statement is arguably as meaningless as saying
3055:
after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
2902:
I would weakly support splitting but I'd say that you should discuss on the talk page before splitting as similar discussions have failed to reach consensus for splitting.
474:. Most websites call it a town, or market town. I think it's too big a change to make on one editor's opinion: if DoB really thinks he knows better than every editor since
4651:
Care should be taken not to give the impression that there is an officially defined unparished area with the name and boundaries of the pre-1974 urban district or borough.
4550:
Care should be taken not to give the impression that there is an officially defined unparished area with the name and boundaries of the pre-1974 urban district or borough.
3455:
1521:, the image selection for infoboxes can be very sensitive and taste is highly subjective. I strongly advise that you propose changes at the articles' talk pages first. --
5823:(and mention it there). There isn't a Brockhampton in the town of Tewkesbury but there is one in the district of Tewkesbury just like the other is in Cotswold district.
402:
Population but may reappear if it goes over 500 in the 2022 estimate. Also if the definition for defining them changed a few months ago, see the "News" section for the
6007:
5192:
I think the current wording is preferable, it seems like a reasonable compromise to saying its in Sutton in Ashfield unparished area so I'd suggest to leave it as is.
3462:, the one I took to AfD. I'd always thought PetScan was something strange and technical but have now discovered how easy it is to run, to get intersections like that.
2488:
2484:
2206:
2202:
462:, as well as introducing a red link (by adding an unnecessary disambiguation: do they ever check their work?), changes the sense of the statement. What do you think?
602:, which set off the entire ANI thing, was on exactly this topic, and pointing out how to acheieve the desired "miles-first" effect, but was obviously ignored. CIR.
3970:
is an essay and if you want this type of redirect to be eligible for speedy deletion then it needs to be proposed for inclusion under an existing or new criteria.
4225:
Knowledge (XXG) content, and matching of different capitalisations is available for a different subset. Multiple search suggestions are absolutely trivial (but
885:
appear to have full access to Pevsner and likely much else besides, so I probably just have to hope one or more of them work on improving the Batley churches.
4601:
of Leatherhead UD but the parish appears to still have existed until 1974, at the least it appears to have existed in 1951 as there is still census data, see
4254:
If you think readers are likely to benefit from "(Disambiguation)" redirects then why don't you start a request to get a bot to create them all? Otherwise
3268:. In terms of notability (1) it has a reliable source discussing its name history and (2) its an OS settlement which may qualify it as legally recognized.
3004:
287:
2435:
There has to be a middle ground - I did like the read on 'party conventions' - but most of this was not about a seaside town called Blackpool in England.
79:
1268:,.I am intending to take a break in the future but I'm just curious to discuss with you could the following settlements warrant own district articles?
4510:
4468:
1708:
5917:. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review.
5585:, the consensus at RM was to make the song the primary topic; I don't see any consensus (or any discussion at all) concerning a different target for
3833:
2458:
2176:
881:
see a snippet of the description of All Saints', Batley in the 1959 unified volume. And the Historic England page has no information. The editors of
5756:
6018:
5881:
5446:
3781:. Online results mostly concern a vineyard; a cursory search on Google Maps points to a small forest, not a hamlet. Evidence of settlement is just
1719:
5324:
After allowing a little time to pass, I just need to tidy up a loose end or two from our discussions earlier this weekend. With the input of both
906:
You could perhaps move content from the listed buildings article to the articles on the individual churches with attribution like what I did with
5487:
because you may have previously participated in similar discussions and there has been a notable development. Please consider sharing your views.
4836:
So to summarise, you agree that UK BMD does not support the existence of a "Leatherhead unparished area" or the "unparished area of Leatherhead".
4034:
Words utilizing title case as opposed to sentence case do not quality for R3 as they are not implausible. You're welcome to bring this up on at
1649:
Thanks, I've done a lot of work on Commons with pubs in the last few months. That said I don't drink alcohol so an imaginary ale will be fine.
2492:
2432:
The image sizes, the 2021 census data, removal of CLOP, fewer but more robust citations - I cannot think anyone would be against such changes.
2210:
558:. Were previous editors wrong in saying that Great Bridge is in Tipton, or was DoB wrong in their change? There's no edit summary to explain.
5577:
to arrive at different articles. Should an RFD be opened, I would be in favour of making the lowercase a primary redirect to the article at
5435:
3451:
2495:, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under
2213:, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under
283:
164:. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than
4426:
4408:
3789:
either speak of a wood being cleared or a road called Winding Wood. All this is insufficient evidence of human settlement or a notable wood.
4609:. Note that "Ashtead" would not be an individual unparished area even though it appears to have been a parish until 1974 since as noted at
4506:
4480:
4464:
2661:
2094:
1562:
4959:
there was a consensus to remove unparished areas completely from articles just from the leads and to be careful about how we word things.
4605:. We could rephrase it to something like "it became part of the unparished area of Leatherhead in Mole Valley" or use a similar format to
5870:
3105:
2148:
In accordance with our policy that Knowledge (XXG) is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
688:
4979:
I don't want to talk any more about the Skegby article - it's a distraction from the main conversation here. We can return to it later.
2369:
deleted other more conservative edits - the sizing of the images is the most notably visual loss of quality by these wholesale resets.
458:
I'm not sure that DoB understands that "contiguous" means "adjacent to", rather than "part of". There was something else recently, and
5727:
3881:
2480:
2198:
3837:
1354:
1343:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
3589:# You add material yourself, with a reference which you may have found in another article but which you have verified for yourself.
2225:
2194:
2180:
1812:
link before publishing and a second time after publishing just in case an error slips through. Thanks to the very helpful message @
876:
Letting you know that I've been working on fixing up the articles on those poor churches. Unfortunately the revised version of the
144:
4801:
2507:
2476:
2462:
1200:
even if we do use the word district for the unitary district we should include "ceremonial county" not just "county" for example "
5610:
3686:
Can you explain on why you keep basing almost all of your RMs on pageviews almost solely? Searching also matters and Ngrams too!
2683:
728:
3339:, which you might like to elaborate on... in 2011 census it was only called Leckhampton, so I don't know whether it's expanded?
1939:
I hope to make a start on this later today or tomorrow, using my various book sources. Am I OK to move into article space from
56:
5999:
5987:
2962:
2657:
1247:
1169:
150:
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than
2631:
2329:
2286:
51:
4982:
Again, yes or no - do you agree that you must not use the phrases "unparished area of " or " unparished area" in an article?
3161:
2379:
I did actually think the changes others made - size of images - should be reverted - but I am not getting directly involved.
1414:
to suggest that using a collage is a good idea, so no guidance as to how to make one. How can we avoid such clunky collages?
3825:
3769:
3747:
860:
161:
2376:
I usually only focus on medical and science articles and there is less room for bombast and group think in such articles -
2044:, which seems to suggest (if Iâm reading it correctly) that separate articles for the local authorities should actually be
5511:
5212:
Again we go back a step. Do you agree that there is no such thing as the "Sutton in Ashfield unparished area"? Yes or no?
4924:
Great, so you agree with both points - and it is wrong to write "unparished area of " or " unparished area" in an article.
4840:
2712:
2030:
854:
5819:. If you think its a problem with the link being red you could create an article on the Tewkesbury one or redirect it to
5107:
Do you now agree that you must not use the phrases "unparished area of " or " unparished area" in an article? Yes or no?
4944:
Do you now agree that you must not use the phrases "unparished area of " or " unparished area" in an article? Yes or no?
3829:
5070:
Great. So do you now agree that you must not use the phrases "unparished area of " or " unparished area" in an article?
3812:
3336:
2023:
1535:
I'll do so now, made my changes just now before seeing your ping. So I will tag the relevant editors to the discussion.
61:
4843:
does not support the existence of a "Leatherhead unparished area" or the "unparished area of Leatherhead"? Yes or no?
4781:
does not support the existence of a "Leatherhead unparished area" or the "unparished area of Leatherhead"? Yes or no?
4648:
districts prior to 1974, both now form part of the single wider unparished area of the modern district of Mole Valley.
4547:
districts prior to 1974, both now form part of the single wider unparished area of the modern district of Mole Valley.
2730:
Thanks, I can see you've done the motion work and I'll do the other cleanup work with notices etc later this evening.
2643:
692:
279:
115:
2097:
its only the name of a parish similar to district councils generally we don't need separate articles on the council.
1846:
4079:. I also agree with you regarding the examples, it's why I felt it important to mention title case in this context.
2036:, as it would seem to me that such articles could (and possibly should) become separate from the articles about the
4591:
4372:
4350:
3859:
3849:
3056:
3042:
2079:
1974:
You can just do it, you don't need to ask me first, I've done what I can with it so once you're done just move it.
1243:
1192:
1181:
1165:
882:
86:
using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our
2562:
districts are partly unparished but there isn't separate articles so its not really possible to add the category.
4215:
4139:
4084:
4047:
4010:
3975:
3786:
3734:
3691:
1940:
1408:
1331:
779:
How can we help them to improve the encyclopedia rather than leaving a trail of dab links and garbled sentences?
6002:, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
5865:, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
5490:
5430:, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
3782:
3573:
You talk about "when moving content from another Knowledge (XXG) article", but there are two possible scenarios:
2772:, that you have agreed to monitor their future edits to ensure there are no further problems such as those seen
1703:, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
253:
46:
41:
6145:
so it shouldn't link to the more general article yet use more specific title. You could create a redirect from
4183:
3139:
2885:
2857:
2445:
2387:
2142:
2120:
2056:
1887:
1700:
1688:
1624:
Great work improving British pub articles. Apologies for the lager, you will just have to imagine a real ale.
1566:
1540:
1505:
1313:
976:
713:
705:
684:
5910:
5794:
5723:
4294:
is almost never relevant - something else (not) existing is not a reason why a given page should (not) exist.
4179:
4006:
4002:
2619:
2041:
75:
4404:
4263:
4237:
4171:
4076:
3994:
6111:. The article is about the group of buildings. Its first line says, "Tš Mawr in Dingestow, Monmouthshire is
5914:
5903:
5760:
4684:
4268:
4233:
4175:
3998:
3765:
3751:
3165:
3039:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page
2837:
2090:
2005:
1347:
323:
4299:
4291:
4259:
3869:
3778:
3351:
says "Leckhampton with Warden Hill is one of only five parishes within Cheltenham Borough Council's area".
1904:
1858:
1239:
6048:
5922:
5644:
5622:
5427:
5415:
4229:
is a request for a way to manage these) in comparison as both will take you to the page you want to go to.
4182:. Also searching for "Jupiter (Disambiguation)" with the search box returns the correctly titled DAB page
3936:
3877:
2297:
2152:, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can
1950:
764:
110:
4311:
So yes, I agree that we should keep all the others that have been created and am arguing exactly that at
3841:
3265:
2956:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Historic sites/Missing commons category links for listed buildings in England
2149:
2068:
2052:
83:
6044:
5955:
5933:
5862:
5850:
5806:
5755:
Because there is a Brockhampton in the Tewkesbury district as well as one in the Cotswold district, see
5738:
5084:
Saying that Leatherhead district had no successor parish and became unparished seems acceptable though.
3845:
3009:
936:
890:
867:
737:
636:
6150:
6146:
6142:
6108:
4886:
means that you should avoid introducing the concept of an "unparished area of " or " unparished area".
4430:
4207:
4035:
3908:
2000:
And if yamla gets wind of this, he will rest the S.O. clock. I'm trying to be nice, but I have limits.
1485:
for example. That does the collage automagically, allowing control over each component individually. --
1197:
5802:
5750:
5734:
5159:
Thinking more broadly now. I would be happy for you to use the following wording in similar articles:
4042:
at WT:CSD, who also thought that improperly capitalized disambiguators shouldn't be speedily deleted.
3249:
My reason was poor, its not notable, its an uncontroversial merge. If you think it's notable say why.
3021:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was
1845:. While it would be good for editors to avoid creating disambiguation links keep in mind that per the
6029:
5892:
5699:
5684:
5541:
5457:
5392:. I will however not add anymore mentions of unparished areas until we get consensus on this though.
4778:
4587:
4211:
4210:
to include it under an existing or new rationale. Until then, it's not eligible for speedy deletion.
4135:
4101:
4080:
4043:
3987:
3971:
3730:
3703:
3687:
3322:
3157:
3088:
2086:
1730:
877:
773:
Slightly more subjectively: Adds some strange wording - "since" when? How can a "site" be demolished?
680:
676:
4303:
4295:
4255:
3904:
2601:
1447:
969:
67:
4602:
4554:
This issue has been explained several times. Please stop pretending, as you did with your edits at
4539:
4320:
4245:
4161:
4062:
3729:
Oh, sorry for being combative, Someone had told me already that primary topic is defined by usage.
3151:
3135:
2897:
2881:
2441:
2399:
2383:
2366:
1898:
1883:
1852:
1536:
1516:
1501:
1366:
1325:
1309:
1295:
1024:
999:
988:
972:
810:
709:
701:
656:
521:
6187:
6011:
5966:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
5951:
5874:
5655:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
5640:
5439:
4383:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
4368:
3785:
passing reference in a town council meeting to a "residential burglary", while the county council
2615:
2156:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
2138:
1712:
6192:
6155:
6138:
6083:
5825:
5790:
I know you made a change, but it does not seem to have had any effect on the problem as reported.
5785:
5765:
5694:
Scrub that, I got confused between St Blazey and St Blaise, they both sound the same in my head!
5594:
5551:
5519:
5394:
5385:
5366:
5302:
5265:
5253:
5229:
5217:
5194:
5180:
5123:
5112:
5086:
5075:
5052:
5039:
4998:
4987:
4961:
4949:
4941:
made a small edit to this article at the end of last year, he may not have noticed this wording.)
4906:
4891:
4859:
4848:
4815:
4786:
4772:
4743:
4731:
4713:
4693:
4662:
4635:
4615:
4568:
4529:
4487:
4273:
4188:
4150:
4115:
4016:
3913:
3711:
3623:
3530:
3424:
3270:
3231:
3171:
3110:
2970:
2904:
2865:
2833:
2800:
2732:
2564:
2532:
2407:
2247:
2234:
2099:
2001:
1976:
1909:
1863:
1804:
1651:
1452:
1375:
1335:
1265:
1212:
1099:
1035:
1004:
961:
912:
825:
478:, it would be better discussed on the talk page of the article. (And note that they themself had
409:
328:
259:
3447:
5963:
5652:
4833:
A simple "yes" or "no" is all we need. What UK BMD did or didn't say in the past is irrelevant.
4380:
3459:
2856:
Thank you for your note at TfD, but can you please respond to my concerns and my suggestion at
2153:
6063:
5918:
5582:
5537:
3932:
3894:
3873:
3808:
3415:
3293:
3254:
3223:
3219:
sure if it qualifies for a separate article but given the history I'd suggest tagging it with
3201:
3029:
3016:
2708:
2336:
2293:
1969:
1945:
1821:
1674:
1669:
I stopped some years ago. Was in a pub on Sunday for the London wiki meet-up, and had coffee.
1629:
1600:
965:
953:
907:
664:
526:
506:
3967:
3348:
2627:
5820:
5164:
4806:
4444:
2650:
1618:
1274:
1123:
1030:
932:
901:
886:
863:
814:
733:
696:
647:
632:
591:
255:
198:
6003:
5947:
5866:
5636:
5431:
4364:
3795:
2860:. If you add that template to the page without gaining consensus first, I will remove it.
2630:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
2623:
2496:
2214:
2134:
1704:
6025:
5888:
5695:
5680:
5453:
5168:
4610:
4559:
3580:
3319:
3100:
3084:
3068:
2823:
2781:
1726:
1283:
1205:
administrative county and that Thurrock is an administrative county. For the likes of say
1160:
770:
Creates a broken sentence: "The station site has since been demolished and in the 1990's."
97:
37:
I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
5034:
unparished area with the name and boundaries of the pre-1974 urban district or borough"?
3593:
4797:
4691:
is in the parished area of Mole Valley as opposed to saying its in the parish of Capel.
502:
6215:
6178:
6120:
5104:
Before we talk about an alternative wording, I need a yes or no answer to the question.
4680:
4316:
4241:
4157:
4095:
4072:
4058:
4039:
3963:
3931:
Thanks for such a quick reply - very helpful. I will follow your advice. Best wishes
3864:
already at AFD though as a speedy keep but even still should probably go again not PROD
3652:
3606:
3559:
3506:
3472:
3393:
3364:
3156:
It might do but given this seems to have been discussed I'd suggest discussing this at
2937:
1789:
1763:
1424:
1357:
where we can see 3 cases that probably at least should be seriously considered, namely
1136:
1074:
789:
612:
599:
568:
539:
492:
437:
380:
356:
300:
105:
16:
3794:
While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be
587:
continue I'll feel tempted to go to ANI to ask for a topic ban on edits involving the
5590:
5531:
5515:
5378:
5362:
5298:
5249:
5213:
5176:
5108:
5071:
5035:
4983:
4945:
4887:
4844:
4782:
4727:
4673:
4658:
4580:
4564:
2861:
2229:
1526:
1490:
1482:
1201:
651:
88:
4436:
Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 26 § London (Disambiguation)
2928:
Hi Crouch, hope you are keeping well. I see youâre re-adding the Commons cats here,
92:, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "
6059:
6055:
5715:
5586:
5578:
5574:
5570:
5545:
5507:
5500:
5484:
4598:
4240:, which is why I opposed deletion of the former and oppose deletion of the latter.
4109:
3576:# You copy text and refs from another article and acknowledge this with the proper
3490:
3289:
3250:
3213:
3197:
2725:
2701:
2527:
2245:
There are no unparished areas in Northamptonshire anymore so it should be deleted.
1836:
1817:
1670:
1644:
1625:
1596:
1592:
672:
668:
660:
5514:? Every topic on that dabpage is titled "Stressed Out" with both capital letters.
2592:
2318:
2275:
5544:
though its only listed in the "See also" it is linked directly in the hatnote at
4262:
are perfectly valid reasons for deletion. There is no reason that I can see that
6190:, we don't want to link to less specific titles which display as more specific.
4688:
4613:
we don't normally use the urban parishes to define individual unparished areas.
4440:
4226:
2996:
1750:
466:
5175:
Are you happy with this proposed wording? If not, what would you change it to?
4597:. The parish council was indeed abolished because it appears to have become an
4595:
2551:
6078:
6074:
5798:
3343:
3064:
3046:
2819:
2793:
2777:
2559:
2555:
2438:
Many apologies - I certainly will not be directly editing this article again.
2075:
1299:
1277:
257:
5167:
was created for the former urban district and Settlement X became part of an
4313:
Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 6#Superdome (Stadium)
322:
I've done so. This is something I've pointed out before to another user, see
6219:
6211:
6205:
6182:
6174:
6168:
6132:
6124:
6116:
6096:
6067:
6033:
5998:
Hello, Crouch, Swale. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
5980:
5946:
Hello, Crouch, Swale. It has been over six months since you last edited the
5926:
5896:
5861:
Hello, Crouch, Swale. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
5838:
5816:
5810:
5778:
5742:
5703:
5688:
5669:
5635:
Hello, Crouch, Swale. It has been over six months since you last edited the
5614:
5598:
5564:
5523:
5494:
5461:
5426:
Hello, Crouch, Swale. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
5407:
5370:
5306:
5278:
5257:
5242:
5221:
5207:
5184:
5136:
5116:
5099:
5079:
5065:
5043:
5011:
4991:
4974:
4953:
4919:
4904:
successor parish being established and as such becoming an unparished area.
4895:
4872:
4852:
4828:
4790:
4756:
4735:
4706:
4666:
4628:
4572:
4514:
4500:
4472:
4448:
4397:
4363:
Hello, Crouch, Swale. It has been over six months since you last edited the
4324:
4286:
4249:
4219:
4201:
4165:
4143:
4128:
4088:
4066:
4051:
4029:
3979:
3940:
3926:
3885:
3853:
3738:
3724:
3695:
3661:
3643:
3636:
3615:
3597:
3568:
3550:
3543:
3522:
3515:
3497:
3481:
3463:
3437:
3409:
3402:
3384:
3373:
3355:
3325:
3297:
3283:
3258:
3244:
3205:
3184:
3143:
3123:
3092:
3072:
2983:
2949:
2941:
2933:
2917:
2889:
2869:
2841:
2827:
2813:
2785:
2768:
2753:
2745:
2717:
2665:
2577:
2545:
2521:
2449:
2420:
2391:
2343:
2301:
2260:
2239:
2170:
2133:
Hello, Crouch, Swale. It has been over six months since you last edited the
2112:
2093:
the place is large an article on the council may be appropriate but if like
2060:
2009:
1989:
1961:
1922:
1891:
1876:
1832:
1825:
1813:
1798:
1780:
1772:
1754:
1734:
1699:
Hello, Crouch, Swale. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
1678:
1664:
1633:
1604:
1585:
1581:
1570:
1544:
1530:
1509:
1494:
1472:
1465:
1441:
1433:
1415:
1400:
1388:
1317:
1251:
1225:
1173:
1145:
1127:
1112:
1091:
1083:
1065:
1048:
1017:
980:
940:
925:
894:
871:
838:
806:
798:
780:
751:
I will (and I mean will) check and double check and quadruple check my edits
741:
717:
640:
621:
603:
584:
577:
559:
548:
530:
483:
482:
Grassington from village to town a few minutes earlier in another article.)
446:
428:
422:
396:
389:
371:
365:
347:
341:
317:
309:
291:
175:
124:
3314:
Hello Crouch, Swale. I'm informing you that per a rough consensus of Arbs,
1779:
mobile. Thirdly, the talk page alert should have inspired a quick tidy-up.
3818:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing
5971:
5660:
4388:
3959:
3024:
2512:
2161:
1746:
1555:
1522:
1486:
1358:
995:
513:
5994:
5857:
5422:
4415:
2634:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1695:
4555:
3966:
changing the speedy deletion tag from the R3 that you applied to a G4.
2776:. Essentially, you would mentor them if unblocked. Is this accurate? --
2611:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1362:
1289:
1286:
1271:
659:
but extremely helpful to others. Size of the settlement is irrelevant.
501:
19:45, 15 June 2023 (UTC) Note that the National Park is inconsistent (
403:
5969:
Thank you for your submission to Knowledge (XXG), and happy editing.
5658:
Thank you for your submission to Knowledge (XXG), and happy editing.
2078:
a district is covered in a settlement or similar then an article like
5389:
5337:
5293:
5151:
4928:
4606:
2502:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may
2220:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may
1943:
when I've done as much as I can, or shall I ping you first? Cheers,
1292:
1206:
820:
510:
5733:
Can you please do what's necessary to straighten this out? Thanks.
3414:
Thanks for creating it, I have added an infobox etc. It appears per
3033:
and pledged that it would be kept in perpetuity as a public amenity?
4433:. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at
4386:
Thanks for your submission to Knowledge (XXG), and happy editing.
3901:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Government Colony High School
2159:
Thanks for your submission to Knowledge (XXG), and happy editing.
1230:
Tyvm, that's helpful. I can leave it alone with a clear conscience.
5506:
Hi, thank you for your contributions. I note your recent edit to
2762:
1280:
1187:
15:
5510:. Why do you believe that the lowercase term should redirect to
2930:
Grade I listed buildings in England completed in the 20th century
6043:
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
5326:
4937:
4721:
2647:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
1580:
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
859:
5536:
Because there seems to have been concern at the discussions at
5356:
5288:
2637:
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
2605:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All
471:
5332:
2818:
Thanks, I'll update the UTRS ticket with your confirmation. --
853:
517:
260:
192:
128:
4170:
From a reader's prospective there is nothing different about
5938:
5627:
4355:
4267:
that are different about 1 redirect than all the others and
3756:
3496:
template formats a URL better in an infobox. I've fixed it.
3450:. There is now just one article left in the intersection of
2467:
2185:
2125:
4996:
No, I don't think that was intended, just not in the lead.
964:, I recently created a new article for Worcestershire. The
370:
What's "the 500 threshold" which you mentioned to that IP?
4640:
No that is not what the consensus was. Again quoting from
1234:
in Berkshire; before boundary changes in 1899 it was in ]
4777:
Let's take this step by step. Firstly, do you agree that
4485:
Yes it was a simple C&P error, thanks for fixing it.
3592:
Remember that we do not consider Knowledge (XXG) to be a
3023:... that in the early 20th century, the town council of
6047:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
4459:
4421:
4105:
3836:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
3315:
2692:
2691:
The two Ireland page name move discussion restrictions
2618:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1842:
1584:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
1061:
848:
754:
724:
628:
555:
479:
475:
459:
275:
6173:
Where do you get these, rather pointless, ideas from?
5730:. It is not obvious what this link should really be.
3801:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
346:
Thanks. I wonder whether it will make any difference.
2019:
Hi, I hope you donât mind the question on your talk.
1346:
wasn't abolished so should probably be moved back to
4429:
to determine whether its use and function meets the
4306:. I also addressed this point in a previous message
4014:
redirects but the existing R3 can probably be used.
3858:
Hi there - thanks for your message about my PROD of
3035:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
2479:
indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a
2197:
indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a
6115:". Why therefore would you pick the gatehouse out?
6107:I'm finding this latest batch odd/irritating. Take
3037:
Template:Did you know nominations/Cote, West Sussex
2858:
Talk:Republic of Ireland#Ireland naming discussions
2550:Tag restored, actually it is parished its just the
1478:
1002:would be be better candidate for splitting though.
6024:Thank you for your submission to Knowledge (XXG).
5887:Thank you for your submission to Knowledge (XXG).
5452:Thank you for your submission to Knowledge (XXG).
3458:(down from either 52 or 62, I forget), and that's
3456:Category:Mountains and hills of the United Kingdom
2040:itself at some point. However, I then came across
1725:Thank you for your submission to Knowledge (XXG).
5797:? Is that "Tewkesbury" distinct from the one in
5679:Former? It's still on the Cornwall Council map .
3418:to have been renamed in 2019 however there is an
2678:- required location of move discussions rescinded
1159:word "district" still appears quite a lot in the
6039:Disambiguation link notification for September 3
3160:. Personally I think we need to look at merging
3911:and use {{subst:afdx|2nd}} to start a new AFD.
847:Thanks for fixing that; turns out to have been
6017:If the page has already been deleted, you can
5880:If the page has already been deleted, you can
5445:If the page has already been deleted, you can
3316:your 2024 restriction appeal has been declined
2497:section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
2215:section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
1718:If the page has already been deleted, you can
823:to remove common nouns not part of the names.
5793:Is the point that there's just no article on
3383:mention parish expansion. I leave it to you!
2195:Category:Unparished areas in Northamptonshire
2181:Category:Unparished areas in Northamptonshire
2085:exist. When it comes to county councils like
1576:Disambiguation link notification for August 4
8:
6006:, so if you wish to retain the page, please
5869:, so if you wish to retain the page, please
5434:, so if you wish to retain the page, please
4933:How to write about parishes#Unparished areas
4884:How to write about parishes#Unparished areas
4642:How to write about parishes#Unparished areas
4542:. In particular, please remember the words:
4536:How to write about parishes#Unparished areas
2477:Category:Unparished areas in Gloucestershire
2463:Category:Unparished areas in Gloucestershire
1707:, so if you wish to retain the page, please
1369:so let's look at splitting those ones first.
1745:they don't read their talk page? Meanwhile
5292:'s input into the specific wording on the
3867:
2682:The Arbitration Committee has resolved by
1561:Is this place a town or a village? Thanks
74:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
3013:was updated with a fact from the article
1857:Have you installed the orange links? see
1841:Its now possible so see links they added
1334:exists which should probably be moved to
5491:đŁđąđŽ đđđžđŹđŞđ˝đ˛đ¸đˇ đđžđđ˛đ˝đ¸đť
4540:this discussion at User:Stortford's talk
2510:and removing the speedy deletion tag.
2228:and removing the speedy deletion tag.
1033:, I'll have a closer look this evening.
753:", and yet their next mainspace edit is
5478:Your opinion on this issue is requested
3807:notice, but please explain why in your
2832:And your mentee is now unblocked. Best
173:. The original talk page is located at
5388:or other places in the former UD like
5361:time..." I know exactly how he feels.
4307:
3586:template on talk page of both articles
750:
554:Found the other dubious "contiguous":
427:Ah, I didn't see the context. Thanks.
5763:the blue link to the locations list.
3452:Category:All articles lacking sources
3446:Ah well. I'll get back to the fun of
2924:Commons cat on Listed buildings lists
7:
6014:that it be moved to your userspace.
5877:that it be moved to your userspace.
5442:that it be moved to your userspace.
3354:Sounds right up your street! Enjoy.
2602:2023 Arbitration Committee elections
2095:Elstree and Borehamwood Town Council
2015:Question regarding council redirects
1715:that it be moved to your userspace.
282:two files which can be found there:
6081:mentioned as its in both parishes.
6021:so you can continue working on it.
5884:so you can continue working on it.
5449:so you can continue working on it.
4298:is even less relevant as it's just
3106:User:Crouch, Swale/Missing parishes
2620:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
2586:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
2373:arguably some degree of consensus.
2022:I was just tagging redirects (e.g.
1807:doesn't mind me chipping in here -
1722:so you can continue working on it.
689:Accrington/Rossendale Built-up area
47:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
5815:DAB pages can have red links, see
5467:Requested move for Twitter article
3796:deleted for any of several reasons
3772:because of the following concern:
3196:expanded. What is it notable for?
2330:Knowledge (XXG) Birthday Committee
2287:Knowledge (XXG) Birthday Committee
2042:WP:UKDISTRICTS § Local authorities
1903:If you follow the instructions at
1305:Just curious what you make of it
108:and someone will drop by to help.
14:
5607:2600:1003:B13A:6AA9:0:1:3400:CF01
5150:Fantastic! Let's think now about
4935:and should be changed. (Although
4839:Next question. Do you agree that
1355:User:Crouch, Swale/District split
1353:In terms of splits let's look at
1344:County Borough of Southend on Sea
5993:
5856:
5718:disambiguation page, there is a
5472:
5421:
4841:this UK government order of 2009
4414:
3349:L with WH parish council website
2995:
2798:Yes I'm still happy to do that.
2591:
2429:noticed - yup - WP Policy naive.
2405:than reverting the entire edit.
2317:
2274:
1694:
1617:
858:
852:
763:Links to a disambiguation page (
197:
6153:and then use the longer title.
6000:Draft:Old Custom House, Ipswich
5988:Draft:Old Custom House, Ipswich
4481:DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered
4458:Hi! Sorry to bother you ... is
4439:until a consensus is reached.
3051:, and the hook may be added to
2958:so I think it is standard with
2700:For the Arbitration Committee,
2641:and submit your choices on the
1260:Suggestions for further splits?
849:changed by Chris j wood in 2015
6220:22:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
6206:14:17, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
6183:14:14, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
6169:14:05, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
6125:14:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
3162:Buckinghamshire County Council
2171:21:35, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
1847:Knowledge (XXG):Editing policy
1500:quite small and lacks quality
68:make test edits in the sandbox
1:
6097:08:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
6068:07:52, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
6034:20:08, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
5512:Stressed Out (disambiguation)
4351:Draft:Eltham, New South Wales
3941:09:29, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
3927:09:26, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
3886:09:21, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
3860:Government Colony High School
3854:14:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
3739:13:38, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
3725:08:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
3696:23:35, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
3662:18:49, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
3637:18:13, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
3616:12:45, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
3569:12:29, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
3544:11:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
3124:07:18, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
3093:22:41, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
3073:00:03, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
2984:18:14, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
2942:18:08, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
2842:14:37, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
2674:Arbitration motion regarding
2666:00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
2578:17:20, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
2546:21:28, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
2522:21:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
2450:18:41, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
2421:18:28, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
2392:18:12, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
2344:23:09, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
2302:07:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
2261:12:21, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
2240:12:12, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
2113:12:55, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
2061:12:45, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
1154:Districts of Buckinghamshire?
125:13:53, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
5581:as an R from lowercase. At
4931:article is in conflict with
4813:these areas are unparished.
3777:Cannot verify that it meets
3516:21:38, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
3482:21:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
3438:19:56, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
3403:19:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
3374:19:26, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
3342:But here's another anomaly:
3337:Leckhampton with Warden Hill
3326:22:07, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
3298:13:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
3284:13:30, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
3259:13:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
3245:13:14, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
3206:13:03, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
3185:19:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
3144:19:19, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
2918:17:30, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
2890:17:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
2870:19:35, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
2828:18:20, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
2814:18:20, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
2786:18:18, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
2746:18:12, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
2718:18:09, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
2024:Mid Suffolk District Council
708:) 21:32, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
57:How to write a great article
6113:a complex of farm buildings
5981:21:06, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
5569:I don't see any reason for
4590:from 1894 to 1933 and then
4206:Then start a discussion at
4011:Manchester (Disambiguation)
3840:allows discussion to reach
3821:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
3804:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
3335:I've started an article on
2010:20:07, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
1990:10:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
1962:10:12, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
1923:08:28, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
1892:20:40, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
1877:18:11, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
1826:15:51, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
1799:07:14, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
1773:07:07, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
1735:22:01, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
1679:20:17, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
1665:18:51, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
1634:18:43, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
1057:Careless editing continuing
280:Great Bridge, West Midlands
6242:
5927:22:21, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
5909:An editor has asked for a
5728:your edit of 21 April 2022
5408:17:07, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
5371:15:48, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
5307:11:21, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
5279:11:13, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
5258:10:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
5243:10:54, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
5222:10:49, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
5208:10:40, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
5185:10:34, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
5137:10:16, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
5117:10:12, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
5100:09:47, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
5080:00:53, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
5066:21:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
5044:19:16, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
5012:19:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
4992:19:10, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
4975:19:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
4954:18:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
4920:18:41, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
4896:18:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
4873:18:07, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
4853:18:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
4829:17:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
4791:17:36, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
4757:17:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
4736:17:21, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
4707:17:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
4667:16:16, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
4629:12:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
4603:User talk:Stortford#Woking
4592:Leatherhead Urban District
4573:06:20, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
4515:17:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
4501:10:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
4473:22:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
4449:23:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
4398:21:49, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
3832:exist. In particular, the
2954:This article is listed at
2658:MediaWiki message delivery
2323:
2280:
2080:Eastbourne Borough Council
1605:06:04, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
1571:22:52, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
1477:, the other way is to use
1342:Ipswich with Southend the
1193:Buckinghamshire (district)
883:Listed buildings in Batley
693:All Saints' Church, Batley
465:They've also decided that
183:ki/User_talk:Crouch,_Swale
32:welcome to Knowledge (XXG)
28:Hello, Crouch, Swale, and
5897:22:05, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
5839:19:39, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
5811:19:33, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
5779:18:59, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
5743:18:54, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
5670:20:37, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
4900:I agree with both points.
4505:Aha, brilliant, thanks!
4325:21:50, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
4287:21:31, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
4250:21:24, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
4220:20:35, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
4202:20:22, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
4166:20:09, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
4144:20:07, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
4129:20:03, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
4089:19:55, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
4067:19:49, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
4052:19:32, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
4030:19:08, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
3980:12:58, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
3826:proposed deletion process
2990:DYK for Cote, West Sussex
2493:Categories for discussion
2475:A tag has been placed on
2365:Sadly, the reversion by @
2211:Categories for discussion
2193:A tag has been placed on
1941:Draft:Borough of Brighton
1545:15:52, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
1531:15:49, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
1510:15:45, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
1495:11:49, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
1466:11:12, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
1434:06:03, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
1389:22:17, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
1332:County Borough of Ipswich
1318:21:55, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
1252:19:55, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
1226:18:50, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
1174:18:23, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
941:11:40, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
926:10:41, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
895:10:38, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
872:06:35, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
839:02:48, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
799:07:49, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
742:22:06, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
729:National Heritage listing
718:21:32, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
641:20:47, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
622:07:10, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
578:19:53, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
549:20:20, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
447:18:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
423:17:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
390:17:32, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
366:17:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
342:17:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
310:17:12, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
5795:Brockhampton, Tewkesbury
5724:Brockhampton, Tewkesbury
5710:Brockhampton, Tewkesbury
5704:17:07, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
5689:17:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
5615:14:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
5599:19:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
5565:19:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
5524:19:04, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
5495:06:05, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
5483:You have been tagged to
5462:05:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
4857:No, I agree it doesn't.
4427:redirects for discussion
4409:Redirects for discussion
4184:Jupiter (disambiguation)
4180:Jupiter (Disambiguation)
4007:Mercury (Disambiguation)
4003:Jupiter (Disambiguation)
3899:Yes it was discussed at
3229:and start a discussion.
3078:Missing Parishes Project
2655:to your user talk page.
2489:featured topics category
2207:featured topics category
2121:Draft:Isaacs on the Quay
1701:Draft:Isaacs on the Quay
1689:Draft:Isaacs on the Quay
1146:11:40, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
1113:11:17, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
1084:10:57, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
1049:09:33, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
1018:21:15, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
981:19:16, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
727:didn't even include the
685:Borough of Middlesbrough
6019:request it be undeleted
5915:Liverpool 1 (TV series)
5904:Liverpool 1 (TV series)
5882:request it be undeleted
5447:request it be undeleted
4685:Special:Diff/1173644621
4422:London (Disambiguation)
4405:London (Disambiguation)
4302:with a side helping of
4264:London (Disambiguation)
4238:London (Disambiguation)
4236:etc is no different to
4172:London (Disambiguation)
4100:I think the discussion
4077:London (Disambiguation)
3995:London (Disambiguation)
3813:the article's talk page
3766:Winding Wood, Berkshire
3752:Winding Wood, Berkshire
3381:this neighbourhood plan
3166:Buckinghamshire Council
2852:Ireland naming template
2481:disambiguation category
2199:disambiguation category
2091:Shrewsbury Town Council
1720:request it be undeleted
1348:City of Southend-on-Sea
583:If edits like those to
324:User talk:109.144.23.87
6210:Roll on December, eh.
6137:The article target is
6049:Ayton, North Yorkshire
5964:request its undeletion
5943:
5653:request its undeletion
5632:
4611:Talk:Bulkington#Parish
4381:request its undeletion
4360:
4269:Paris (Disambiguation)
4234:Paris (Disambiguation)
4176:Paris (Disambiguation)
3999:Paris (Disambiguation)
3792:
3761:
3486:Don't forget that the
3057:Did you know talk page
2963:EH listed building row
2504:contest the nomination
2491:, under discussion at
2472:
2324:Happy First Edit Day,
2281:Happy First Edit Day,
2222:contest the nomination
2209:, under discussion at
2190:
2154:request its undeletion
2130:
765:Great Northern Railway
472:parish council website
25:
6045:John Carr (architect)
5948:Articles for Creation
5942:
5726:, which was added in
5637:Articles for Creation
5631:
4365:Articles for Creation
4359:
3956:RfD discussion linked
3838:articles for deletion
3774:
3770:proposed for deletion
3760:
2676:Ireland article names
2616:Arbitration Committee
2599:Hello! Voting in the
2554:hasn't been updated.
2471:
2352:The Blackpool article
2310:Happy First Edit Day!
2189:
2135:Articles for Creation
2129:
1182:John Maynard Friedman
278:as "Dead links" from
19:
6056:Opt-out instructions
5932:Your draft article,
5623:Draft:Sharlston Hall
5621:Your draft article,
5542:Psychological stress
5428:Draft:Sharlston Hall
5416:Draft:Sharlston Hall
4809:so essentially as a
4719:their own right. As
4588:Epsom Rural District
4454:Rothley and Chathill
4349:Your draft article,
3310:2024 appeal declined
3158:Talk:Buckinghamshire
2693:enacted in June 2009
2119:Your draft article,
2087:Essex County Council
2031:R with possibilities
1593:Opt-out instructions
1029:Thanks for creating
878:Buildings of England
681:Borough of Blackpool
677:City of Peterborough
520:, though admittedly
5954:page you started, "
5643:page you started, "
5549:start if you want.
4431:redirect guidelines
4425:has been listed at
4371:page you started, "
4104:is referring to is
3053:the statistics page
2357:The Blackpool topic
2141:page you started, "
1935:Borough of Brighton
1399:The new collage at
1367:Newcastle upon Tyne
1000:Borough of Redditch
6151:Tš Mawr, Dingestow
6139:Ty Mawr, Dingestow
6109:Tš Mawr, Dingestow
5986:Concern regarding
5944:
5934:Draft:Eyre, Raasay
5863:Draft:Eyre, Raasay
5851:Draft:Eyre, Raasay
5849:Concern regarding
5633:
5414:Concern regarding
5386:Sutton-in-Ashfield
4807:successor parishes
4361:
3830:deletion processes
3762:
2769:UTRS appeal #81892
2760:The blocked user,
2754:UTRS appeal #81892
2632:arbitration policy
2473:
2382:Kind Regards, Dr.
2191:
2143:Isaacs on the Quay
2131:
1740:Links to dab pages
1687:Concern regarding
1336:Borough of Ipswich
160:you are viewing a
66:Also feel free to
52:How to edit a page
26:
6147:Ty Mawr Gatehouse
6143:Ty Mawr Gatehouse
5583:Talk:Stressed Out
5538:Talk:Stressed Out
5485:this conversation
4594:from 1933 to 1974
4154:
4075:: It's regarding
3888:
3872:comment added by
3748:Proposed deletion
3379:Pages 6 and 7 of
3050:
3047:Cote, West Sussex
3017:Cote, West Sussex
2834:-- Deepfriedokra
2716:
2668:
2508:visiting the page
2485:category redirect
2349:
2348:
2334:Have a great day!
2307:
2306:
2291:Have a great day!
2226:visiting the page
2203:category redirect
2002:-- Deepfriedokra
1957:
1639:
1638:
971:. Thanks Crouch.
966:City of Worcester
954:City of Worcester
908:Draft:Plaish Hall
527:Elizabeth Gaskell
266:
265:
191:
190:
6233:
6202:
6195:
6165:
6158:
6136:
6093:
6086:
5997:
5979:
5941:
5902:Move review for
5860:
5835:
5828:
5789:
5775:
5768:
5754:
5668:
5630:
5561:
5554:
5535:
5493:
5476:
5475:
5425:
5404:
5397:
5382:
5359:
5335:
5329:
5291:
5275:
5268:
5239:
5232:
5204:
5197:
5165:successor parish
5133:
5126:
5096:
5089:
5062:
5055:
5008:
5001:
4971:
4964:
4940:
4916:
4909:
4869:
4862:
4825:
4818:
4776:
4753:
4746:
4724:
4717:
4703:
4696:
4677:
4639:
4625:
4618:
4584:
4534:I remind you of
4533:
4523:Unparished areas
4497:
4490:
4484:
4424:
4418:
4396:
4358:
4283:
4276:
4198:
4191:
4148:
4125:
4118:
4099:
4026:
4019:
3991:
3962:'s reversal of @
3923:
3916:
3898:
3846:IgnatiusofLondon
3823:
3822:
3806:
3805:
3759:
3721:
3714:
3707:
3659:
3650:
3633:
3626:
3613:
3604:
3585:
3579:
3566:
3557:
3540:
3533:
3526:
3513:
3504:
3495:
3489:
3479:
3470:
3434:
3427:
3413:
3400:
3391:
3371:
3362:
3280:
3273:
3241:
3234:
3228:
3222:
3217:
3181:
3174:
3155:
3120:
3113:
3104:
3040:
3005:27 December 2023
2999:
2980:
2973:
2967:
2961:
2953:
2914:
2907:
2901:
2810:
2803:
2797:
2771:
2765:
2756:
2742:
2735:
2729:
2706:
2704:
2656:
2654:
2595:
2574:
2567:
2542:
2535:
2520:
2470:
2417:
2410:
2403:
2341:
2321:
2314:
2313:
2278:
2271:
2270:
2257:
2250:
2237:
2232:
2188:
2169:
2128:
2109:
2102:
2072:
2035:
2029:
1986:
1979:
1973:
1960:
1958:
1955:
1953:
1919:
1912:
1902:
1873:
1866:
1856:
1840:
1796:
1787:
1770:
1761:
1698:
1661:
1654:
1648:
1621:
1614:
1613:
1520:
1480:
1476:
1462:
1455:
1445:
1431:
1422:
1413:
1409:Infobox UK place
1407:
1385:
1378:
1329:
1222:
1215:
1185:
1143:
1134:
1124:User:Giraffedata
1109:
1102:
1095:
1081:
1072:
1045:
1038:
1031:City of Coventry
1028:
1014:
1007:
992:
922:
915:
905:
862:
856:
835:
828:
818:
796:
787:
697:Jonathan Hellyer
619:
610:
596:
590:
575:
566:
546:
537:
499:
490:
444:
435:
419:
412:
400:
387:
378:
363:
354:
338:
331:
321:
307:
298:
261:
201:
193:
187:
184:
181:
178:
172:
171:
168:
159:
157:
154:
143:
142:
139:
129:
122:
118:
113:
103:
102:
96:
6241:
6240:
6236:
6235:
6234:
6232:
6231:
6230:
6200:
6193:
6163:
6156:
6130:
6105:
6091:
6084:
6041:
5991:
5970:
5939:
5937:
5907:
5854:
5833:
5826:
5821:Bishop's Cleeve
5783:
5773:
5766:
5748:
5712:
5677:
5659:
5628:
5626:
5559:
5552:
5529:
5504:
5489:
5473:
5469:
5419:
5402:
5395:
5376:
5355:
5331:
5325:
5287:
5273:
5266:
5237:
5230:
5202:
5195:
5169:unparished area
5131:
5124:
5094:
5087:
5060:
5053:
5006:
4999:
4969:
4962:
4936:
4914:
4907:
4867:
4860:
4823:
4816:
4770:
4751:
4744:
4720:
4711:
4701:
4694:
4671:
4633:
4623:
4616:
4578:
4560:Ashford, Surrey
4527:
4525:
4495:
4488:
4478:
4456:
4420:
4412:
4387:
4356:
4354:
4281:
4274:
4271:doesn't exist.
4212:Hey man im josh
4196:
4189:
4136:Hey man im josh
4123:
4116:
4102:Hey man im josh
4093:
4081:Hey man im josh
4044:Hey man im josh
4024:
4017:
3988:Hey man im josh
3985:
3972:Hey man im josh
3951:
3921:
3914:
3892:
3834:speedy deletion
3820:
3819:
3803:
3802:
3757:
3755:
3731:GabrielPenn4223
3719:
3712:
3704:GabrielPenn4223
3701:
3688:GabrielPenn4223
3684:
3682:Requested moves
3653:
3644:
3631:
3624:
3607:
3598:
3594:reliable source
3583:
3577:
3560:
3551:
3538:
3531:
3520:
3507:
3498:
3493:
3487:
3473:
3464:
3432:
3425:
3407:
3394:
3385:
3365:
3356:
3333:
3312:
3278:
3271:
3239:
3232:
3226:
3220:
3211:
3193:
3179:
3172:
3149:
3132:
3130:Buckinghamshire
3118:
3111:
3098:
3080:
3062:
3061:
3000:
2992:
2978:
2971:
2965:
2959:
2947:
2926:
2912:
2905:
2895:
2877:
2854:
2808:
2801:
2791:
2767:
2761:
2758:
2752:
2740:
2733:
2723:
2702:
2698:
2697:
2695:are rescinded.
2680:
2671:
2670:
2648:
2596:
2588:
2572:
2565:
2552:unparished area
2540:
2533:
2511:
2468:
2466:
2459:Speedy deletion
2415:
2408:
2397:
2359:
2354:
2337:
2312:
2269:
2255:
2248:
2235:
2230:
2186:
2184:
2177:Speedy deletion
2160:
2126:
2124:
2107:
2100:
2066:
2038:geographic area
2033:
2027:
2017:
1998:
1984:
1977:
1967:
1956:(Floreat Hova!)
1954:
1951:
1944:
1937:
1917:
1910:
1896:
1871:
1864:
1850:
1830:
1790:
1781:
1764:
1755:
1749:still links to
1742:
1692:
1659:
1652:
1642:
1612:
1610:A beer for you!
1578:
1559:
1514:
1470:
1460:
1453:
1439:
1425:
1416:
1411:
1405:
1397:
1383:
1376:
1323:
1284:Southend on Sea
1262:
1220:
1213:
1179:
1161:Buckinghamshire
1156:
1137:
1128:
1107:
1100:
1089:
1075:
1066:
1059:
1043:
1036:
1022:
1012:
1005:
986:
958:
920:
913:
899:
833:
826:
804:
790:
781:
613:
604:
594:
588:
569:
560:
540:
531:
493:
484:
438:
429:
417:
410:
394:
381:
372:
357:
348:
336:
329:
315:
301:
292:
271:
262:
256:
206:
182:
179:
177:https://en.wiki
176:
174:
169:
166:
165:
155:
152:
151:
140:
137:
136:
120:
116:
111:
100:
94:
93:
62:Manual of Style
12:
11:
5:
6239:
6237:
6229:
6228:
6227:
6226:
6225:
6224:
6223:
6222:
6104:
6101:
6100:
6099:
6040:
6037:
6004:may be deleted
5990:
5984:
5950:submission or
5936:
5930:
5906:
5900:
5867:may be deleted
5853:
5847:
5846:
5845:
5844:
5843:
5842:
5841:
5791:
5711:
5708:
5707:
5706:
5676:
5673:
5645:Sharlston Hall
5639:submission or
5625:
5619:
5618:
5617:
5603:
5602:
5601:
5503:
5498:
5488:
5481:
5480:
5468:
5465:
5432:may be deleted
5418:
5412:
5411:
5410:
5351:
5346:
5342:
5322:
5321:
5320:
5319:
5318:
5317:
5316:
5315:
5314:
5313:
5312:
5311:
5310:
5309:
5284:
5173:
5172:
5158:
5155:
5148:
5147:
5146:
5145:
5144:
5143:
5142:
5141:
5140:
5139:
5105:
5031:
5030:
5029:
5028:
5027:
5026:
5025:
5024:
5023:
5022:
5021:
5020:
5019:
5018:
5017:
5016:
5015:
5014:
4980:
4942:
4925:
4901:
4879:
4837:
4834:
4768:
4767:
4766:
4765:
4764:
4763:
4762:
4761:
4760:
4759:
4654:
4653:
4652:
4649:
4607:Skegby#History
4552:
4551:
4548:
4524:
4521:
4520:
4519:
4518:
4517:
4455:
4452:
4411:
4401:
4367:submission or
4353:
4347:
4346:
4345:
4344:
4343:
4342:
4341:
4340:
4339:
4338:
4337:
4336:
4335:
4334:
4333:
4332:
4331:
4330:
4329:
4328:
4327:
4230:
4222:
4146:
3950:
3947:
3946:
3945:
3944:
3943:
3844:for deletion.
3824:will stop the
3754:
3745:
3744:
3743:
3742:
3741:
3683:
3680:
3679:
3678:
3677:
3676:
3675:
3674:
3673:
3672:
3671:
3670:
3669:
3668:
3667:
3666:
3665:
3664:
3590:
3587:
3574:
3571:
3444:
3332:
3329:
3311:
3308:
3307:
3306:
3305:
3304:
3303:
3302:
3301:
3300:
3192:
3189:
3188:
3187:
3152:DragonofBatley
3136:DragonofBatley
3131:
3128:
3127:
3126:
3079:
3076:
3001:
2994:
2993:
2991:
2988:
2987:
2986:
2925:
2922:
2921:
2920:
2898:DragonofBatley
2882:DragonofBatley
2876:
2873:
2853:
2850:
2849:
2848:
2847:
2846:
2845:
2844:
2757:
2750:
2749:
2748:
2689:
2688:
2679:
2672:
2639:the candidates
2608:eligible users
2597:
2590:
2589:
2587:
2584:
2583:
2582:
2581:
2580:
2465:
2461:nomination of
2456:
2455:
2454:
2453:
2452:
2442:BeingObjective
2439:
2436:
2433:
2430:
2426:
2400:BeingObjective
2384:BeingObjective
2367:DragonofBatley
2358:
2355:
2353:
2350:
2347:
2346:
2322:
2311:
2308:
2305:
2304:
2279:
2268:
2267:First Edit Day
2265:
2264:
2263:
2183:
2179:nomination of
2174:
2137:submission or
2123:
2117:
2116:
2115:
2069:A smart kitten
2053:A smart kitten
2051:All the best,
2016:
2013:
1997:
1994:
1993:
1992:
1936:
1933:
1932:
1931:
1930:
1929:
1928:
1927:
1926:
1925:
1899:DragonofBatley
1884:DragonofBatley
1853:DragonofBatley
1801:
1741:
1738:
1705:may be deleted
1691:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1637:
1636:
1622:
1611:
1608:
1577:
1574:
1563:92.239.240.153
1558:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1537:DragonofBatley
1517:DragonofBatley
1502:DragonofBatley
1497:
1479:multiple image
1468:
1396:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1370:
1351:
1350:at some point.
1339:
1326:DragonofBatley
1310:DragonofBatley
1308:
1261:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1235:
1231:
1155:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1119:
1058:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1025:DragonofBatley
989:DragonofBatley
973:DragonofBatley
957:
956:article checks
951:
950:
949:
948:
947:
946:
945:
944:
943:
874:
842:
841:
811:DragonofBatley
777:
776:
775:
774:
771:
768:
747:
746:
745:
744:
710:DragonofBatley
702:DragonofBatley
657:DragonofBatley
600:Whitney-on-Wye
581:
580:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
404:United Kingdom
368:
270:
267:
264:
263:
258:
254:
252:
249:
248:
208:
207:
202:
196:
189:
188:
149:
145:user talk page
132:
106:your talk page
80:sign your name
72:
71:
64:
59:
54:
49:
44:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
6238:
6221:
6217:
6213:
6209:
6208:
6207:
6203:
6197:
6196:
6194:Crouch, Swale
6189:
6186:
6185:
6184:
6180:
6176:
6172:
6171:
6170:
6166:
6160:
6159:
6157:Crouch, Swale
6152:
6148:
6144:
6140:
6134:
6129:
6128:
6127:
6126:
6122:
6118:
6114:
6110:
6102:
6098:
6094:
6088:
6087:
6085:Crouch, Swale
6080:
6076:
6072:
6071:
6070:
6069:
6065:
6061:
6057:
6052:
6050:
6046:
6038:
6036:
6035:
6031:
6027:
6022:
6020:
6015:
6013:
6009:
6005:
6001:
5996:
5989:
5985:
5983:
5982:
5978:
5976:
5975:
5967:
5965:
5959:
5957:
5953:
5949:
5935:
5931:
5929:
5928:
5924:
5920:
5916:
5912:
5905:
5901:
5899:
5898:
5894:
5890:
5885:
5883:
5878:
5876:
5872:
5868:
5864:
5859:
5852:
5848:
5840:
5836:
5830:
5829:
5827:Crouch, Swale
5822:
5818:
5814:
5813:
5812:
5808:
5804:
5800:
5796:
5792:
5787:
5786:Crouch, Swale
5782:
5781:
5780:
5776:
5770:
5769:
5767:Crouch, Swale
5762:
5758:
5752:
5747:
5746:
5745:
5744:
5740:
5736:
5731:
5729:
5725:
5721:
5717:
5709:
5705:
5701:
5697:
5693:
5692:
5691:
5690:
5686:
5682:
5674:
5672:
5671:
5667:
5665:
5664:
5656:
5654:
5648:
5646:
5642:
5638:
5624:
5620:
5616:
5612:
5608:
5604:
5600:
5596:
5592:
5588:
5584:
5580:
5576:
5572:
5568:
5567:
5566:
5562:
5556:
5555:
5553:Crouch, Swale
5547:
5543:
5539:
5533:
5528:
5527:
5526:
5525:
5521:
5517:
5513:
5509:
5502:
5499:
5497:
5496:
5492:
5486:
5479:
5471:
5470:
5466:
5464:
5463:
5459:
5455:
5450:
5448:
5443:
5441:
5437:
5433:
5429:
5424:
5417:
5413:
5409:
5405:
5399:
5398:
5396:Crouch, Swale
5391:
5387:
5380:
5375:
5374:
5373:
5372:
5368:
5364:
5358:
5352:
5347:
5343:
5339:
5334:
5328:
5308:
5304:
5300:
5295:
5290:
5285:
5282:
5281:
5280:
5276:
5270:
5269:
5267:Crouch, Swale
5261:
5260:
5259:
5255:
5251:
5246:
5245:
5244:
5240:
5234:
5233:
5231:Crouch, Swale
5225:
5224:
5223:
5219:
5215:
5211:
5210:
5209:
5205:
5199:
5198:
5196:Crouch, Swale
5191:
5190:
5189:
5188:
5187:
5186:
5182:
5178:
5170:
5166:
5162:
5161:
5160:
5153:
5138:
5134:
5128:
5127:
5125:Crouch, Swale
5120:
5119:
5118:
5114:
5110:
5106:
5103:
5102:
5101:
5097:
5091:
5090:
5088:Crouch, Swale
5083:
5082:
5081:
5077:
5073:
5069:
5068:
5067:
5063:
5057:
5056:
5054:Crouch, Swale
5048:
5047:
5046:
5045:
5041:
5037:
5013:
5009:
5003:
5002:
5000:Crouch, Swale
4995:
4994:
4993:
4989:
4985:
4981:
4978:
4977:
4976:
4972:
4966:
4965:
4963:Crouch, Swale
4957:
4956:
4955:
4951:
4947:
4943:
4939:
4934:
4930:
4926:
4923:
4922:
4921:
4917:
4911:
4910:
4908:Crouch, Swale
4902:
4899:
4898:
4897:
4893:
4889:
4885:
4880:
4876:
4875:
4874:
4870:
4864:
4863:
4861:Crouch, Swale
4856:
4855:
4854:
4850:
4846:
4842:
4838:
4835:
4832:
4831:
4830:
4826:
4820:
4819:
4817:Crouch, Swale
4812:
4808:
4803:
4799:
4795:
4794:
4793:
4792:
4788:
4784:
4780:
4774:
4773:Crouch, Swale
4758:
4754:
4748:
4747:
4745:Crouch, Swale
4739:
4738:
4737:
4733:
4729:
4723:
4715:
4714:Crouch, Swale
4710:
4709:
4708:
4704:
4698:
4697:
4695:Crouch, Swale
4690:
4686:
4682:
4675:
4670:
4669:
4668:
4664:
4660:
4655:
4650:
4646:
4645:
4643:
4637:
4636:Crouch, Swale
4632:
4631:
4630:
4626:
4620:
4619:
4617:Crouch, Swale
4612:
4608:
4604:
4600:
4596:
4593:
4589:
4582:
4577:
4576:
4575:
4574:
4570:
4566:
4561:
4557:
4549:
4545:
4544:
4543:
4541:
4537:
4531:
4530:Crouch, Swale
4522:
4516:
4512:
4508:
4504:
4503:
4502:
4498:
4492:
4491:
4489:Crouch, Swale
4482:
4477:
4476:
4475:
4474:
4470:
4466:
4461:
4453:
4451:
4450:
4446:
4442:
4438:
4437:
4432:
4428:
4423:
4419:The redirect
4417:
4410:
4406:
4402:
4400:
4399:
4395:
4393:
4392:
4384:
4382:
4376:
4374:
4370:
4366:
4352:
4348:
4326:
4322:
4318:
4314:
4310:
4305:
4301:
4300:WP:OTHERSTUFF
4297:
4293:
4292:WP:OTHERSTUFF
4290:
4289:
4288:
4284:
4278:
4277:
4275:Crouch, Swale
4270:
4265:
4261:
4260:WP:OTHERSTUFF
4257:
4253:
4252:
4251:
4247:
4243:
4239:
4235:
4232:I agree that
4231:
4228:
4223:
4221:
4217:
4213:
4209:
4205:
4204:
4203:
4199:
4193:
4192:
4190:Crouch, Swale
4185:
4181:
4177:
4173:
4169:
4168:
4167:
4163:
4159:
4152:
4151:edit conflict
4147:
4145:
4141:
4137:
4132:
4131:
4130:
4126:
4120:
4119:
4117:Crouch, Swale
4111:
4107:
4103:
4097:
4092:
4091:
4090:
4086:
4082:
4078:
4074:
4070:
4069:
4068:
4064:
4060:
4055:
4054:
4053:
4049:
4045:
4041:
4037:
4033:
4032:
4031:
4027:
4021:
4020:
4018:Crouch, Swale
4012:
4008:
4004:
4000:
3996:
3989:
3984:
3983:
3982:
3981:
3977:
3973:
3969:
3965:
3961:
3957:
3948:
3942:
3938:
3934:
3930:
3929:
3928:
3924:
3918:
3917:
3915:Crouch, Swale
3910:
3906:
3902:
3896:
3891:
3890:
3889:
3887:
3883:
3879:
3875:
3871:
3865:
3861:
3856:
3855:
3851:
3847:
3843:
3839:
3835:
3831:
3827:
3816:
3814:
3810:
3799:
3797:
3791:
3790:
3788:
3784:
3780:
3779:WP:NGEOGRAPHY
3773:
3771:
3767:
3753:
3749:
3746:
3740:
3736:
3732:
3728:
3727:
3726:
3722:
3716:
3715:
3713:Crouch, Swale
3705:
3700:
3699:
3698:
3697:
3693:
3689:
3681:
3663:
3660:
3658:
3657:
3651:
3649:
3648:
3640:
3639:
3638:
3634:
3628:
3627:
3625:Crouch, Swale
3619:
3618:
3617:
3614:
3612:
3611:
3605:
3603:
3602:
3595:
3591:
3588:
3582:
3575:
3572:
3570:
3567:
3565:
3564:
3558:
3556:
3555:
3547:
3546:
3545:
3541:
3535:
3534:
3532:Crouch, Swale
3524:
3519:
3518:
3517:
3514:
3512:
3511:
3505:
3503:
3502:
3492:
3485:
3484:
3483:
3480:
3478:
3477:
3471:
3469:
3468:
3461:
3457:
3453:
3449:
3445:
3441:
3440:
3439:
3435:
3429:
3428:
3426:Crouch, Swale
3421:
3417:
3411:
3406:
3405:
3404:
3401:
3399:
3398:
3392:
3390:
3389:
3382:
3378:
3377:
3376:
3375:
3372:
3370:
3369:
3363:
3361:
3360:
3352:
3350:
3345:
3340:
3338:
3330:
3328:
3327:
3324:
3321:
3320:Moneytreesđď¸
3317:
3309:
3299:
3295:
3291:
3287:
3286:
3285:
3281:
3275:
3274:
3272:Crouch, Swale
3267:
3262:
3261:
3260:
3256:
3252:
3248:
3247:
3246:
3242:
3236:
3235:
3233:Crouch, Swale
3225:
3215:
3210:
3209:
3208:
3207:
3203:
3199:
3190:
3186:
3182:
3176:
3175:
3173:Crouch, Swale
3167:
3163:
3159:
3153:
3148:
3147:
3146:
3145:
3141:
3137:
3129:
3125:
3121:
3115:
3114:
3112:Crouch, Swale
3107:
3102:
3097:
3096:
3095:
3094:
3090:
3086:
3077:
3075:
3074:
3070:
3066:
3060:
3058:
3054:
3048:
3044:
3038:
3034:
3032:
3031:
3026:
3020:
3019:
3018:
3012:
3011:
3006:
2998:
2989:
2985:
2981:
2975:
2974:
2972:Crouch, Swale
2964:
2957:
2951:
2946:
2945:
2944:
2943:
2939:
2935:
2931:
2923:
2919:
2915:
2909:
2908:
2906:Crouch, Swale
2899:
2894:
2893:
2892:
2891:
2887:
2883:
2874:
2872:
2871:
2867:
2863:
2859:
2851:
2843:
2839:
2835:
2831:
2830:
2829:
2825:
2821:
2817:
2816:
2815:
2811:
2805:
2804:
2802:Crouch, Swale
2795:
2790:
2789:
2788:
2787:
2783:
2779:
2775:
2770:
2764:
2755:
2751:
2747:
2743:
2737:
2736:
2734:Crouch, Swale
2727:
2722:
2721:
2720:
2719:
2714:
2710:
2705:
2696:
2694:
2687:
2685:
2677:
2673:
2669:
2667:
2663:
2659:
2652:
2646:
2645:
2640:
2635:
2633:
2629:
2625:
2621:
2617:
2612:
2610:
2609:
2604:
2603:
2594:
2585:
2579:
2575:
2569:
2568:
2566:Crouch, Swale
2561:
2557:
2553:
2549:
2548:
2547:
2543:
2537:
2536:
2534:Crouch, Swale
2529:
2526:
2525:
2524:
2523:
2519:
2517:
2516:
2509:
2505:
2500:
2498:
2494:
2490:
2486:
2482:
2478:
2464:
2460:
2457:
2451:
2447:
2443:
2440:
2437:
2434:
2431:
2427:
2424:
2423:
2422:
2418:
2412:
2411:
2409:Crouch, Swale
2401:
2396:
2395:
2394:
2393:
2389:
2385:
2380:
2377:
2374:
2370:
2368:
2363:
2356:
2351:
2345:
2342:
2340:
2335:
2331:
2327:
2326:Crouch, Swale
2320:
2316:
2315:
2309:
2303:
2299:
2295:
2292:
2288:
2284:
2283:Crouch, Swale
2277:
2273:
2272:
2266:
2262:
2258:
2252:
2251:
2249:Crouch, Swale
2244:
2243:
2242:
2241:
2238:
2233:
2227:
2223:
2218:
2216:
2212:
2208:
2204:
2200:
2196:
2182:
2178:
2175:
2173:
2172:
2168:
2166:
2165:
2157:
2155:
2151:
2146:
2144:
2140:
2136:
2122:
2118:
2114:
2110:
2104:
2103:
2101:Crouch, Swale
2096:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2081:
2077:
2070:
2065:
2064:
2063:
2062:
2058:
2054:
2049:
2047:
2043:
2039:
2032:
2025:
2020:
2014:
2012:
2011:
2007:
2003:
1995:
1991:
1987:
1981:
1980:
1978:Crouch, Swale
1971:
1966:
1965:
1964:
1963:
1959:
1949:
1948:
1942:
1934:
1924:
1920:
1914:
1913:
1911:Crouch, Swale
1906:
1905:WP:DABDISPLAY
1900:
1895:
1894:
1893:
1889:
1885:
1880:
1879:
1878:
1874:
1868:
1867:
1865:Crouch, Swale
1860:
1859:WP:DABDISPLAY
1854:
1848:
1844:
1838:
1834:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1823:
1819:
1815:
1810:
1806:
1805:Crouch, Swale
1802:
1800:
1797:
1795:
1794:
1788:
1786:
1785:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1771:
1769:
1768:
1762:
1760:
1759:
1752:
1748:
1739:
1737:
1736:
1732:
1728:
1723:
1721:
1716:
1714:
1710:
1706:
1702:
1697:
1690:
1686:
1680:
1676:
1672:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1662:
1656:
1655:
1653:Crouch, Swale
1646:
1641:
1640:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1620:
1616:
1615:
1609:
1607:
1606:
1602:
1598:
1594:
1589:
1587:
1583:
1575:
1573:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1557:
1554:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1518:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1507:
1503:
1498:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1483:Milton Keynes
1474:
1469:
1467:
1463:
1457:
1456:
1454:Crouch, Swale
1449:
1443:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1432:
1430:
1429:
1423:
1421:
1420:
1410:
1402:
1394:
1390:
1386:
1380:
1379:
1377:Crouch, Swale
1371:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1349:
1345:
1340:
1337:
1333:
1327:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1306:
1303:
1301:
1297:
1294:
1291:
1288:
1285:
1282:
1279:
1276:
1273:
1269:
1267:
1266:Crouch, Swale
1259:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1240:WP:COMMONNAME
1236:
1232:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1223:
1217:
1216:
1214:Crouch, Swale
1208:
1203:
1202:West Thurrock
1199:
1194:
1189:
1183:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1162:
1153:
1147:
1144:
1142:
1141:
1135:
1133:
1132:
1125:
1120:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1110:
1104:
1103:
1101:Crouch, Swale
1093:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1082:
1080:
1079:
1073:
1071:
1070:
1063:
1056:
1050:
1046:
1040:
1039:
1037:Crouch, Swale
1032:
1026:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1015:
1009:
1008:
1006:Crouch, Swale
1001:
997:
990:
985:
984:
983:
982:
978:
974:
970:
967:
963:
962:Crouch, Swale
955:
952:
942:
938:
934:
929:
928:
927:
923:
917:
916:
914:Crouch, Swale
909:
903:
898:
897:
896:
892:
888:
884:
879:
875:
873:
869:
865:
861:
855:
850:
846:
845:
844:
843:
840:
836:
830:
829:
827:Crouch, Swale
822:
816:
812:
808:
803:
802:
801:
800:
797:
795:
794:
788:
786:
785:
772:
769:
766:
762:
761:
760:
759:
758:
756:
752:
743:
739:
735:
730:
726:
721:
720:
719:
715:
711:
707:
703:
698:
694:
690:
686:
682:
678:
674:
670:
666:
662:
658:
653:
652:Talk:Skegness
649:
645:
644:
643:
642:
638:
634:
630:
624:
623:
620:
618:
617:
611:
609:
608:
601:
593:
586:
579:
576:
574:
573:
567:
565:
564:
557:
553:
552:
551:
550:
547:
545:
544:
538:
536:
535:
528:
523:
519:
515:
512:
508:
504:
500:
498:
497:
491:
489:
488:
481:
477:
473:
468:
463:
461:
448:
445:
443:
442:
436:
434:
433:
426:
425:
424:
420:
414:
413:
411:Crouch, Swale
405:
398:
393:
392:
391:
388:
386:
385:
379:
377:
376:
369:
367:
364:
362:
361:
355:
353:
352:
345:
344:
343:
339:
333:
332:
330:Crouch, Swale
325:
319:
314:
313:
312:
311:
308:
306:
305:
299:
297:
296:
289:
285:
281:
277:
268:
251:
250:
247:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
209:
205:
200:
195:
194:
185:
163:
148:
146:
133:
131:
130:
127:
126:
123:
119:
114:
107:
99:
91:
90:
85:
81:
77:
69:
65:
63:
60:
58:
55:
53:
50:
48:
45:
43:
40:
39:
38:
36:
35:
33:
24:
23:
18:
6199:
6191:
6162:
6154:
6112:
6106:
6103:List changes
6090:
6082:
6053:
6042:
6023:
6016:
5992:
5973:
5972:
5968:
5960:
5945:
5919:JuniperChill
5908:
5886:
5879:
5855:
5832:
5824:
5772:
5764:
5732:
5719:
5716:Brockhampton
5713:
5678:
5662:
5661:
5657:
5649:
5634:
5587:Stressed out
5579:Stressed Out
5575:Stressed out
5571:Stressed Out
5558:
5550:
5546:Stressed Out
5508:Stressed out
5505:
5501:Stressed out
5482:
5477:
5451:
5444:
5420:
5401:
5393:
5353:
5348:
5344:
5323:
5272:
5264:
5236:
5228:
5201:
5193:
5174:
5149:
5130:
5122:
5093:
5085:
5059:
5051:
5032:
5005:
4997:
4968:
4960:
4913:
4905:
4866:
4858:
4822:
4814:
4810:
4769:
4750:
4742:
4700:
4692:
4622:
4614:
4599:urban parish
4553:
4526:
4494:
4486:
4457:
4434:
4413:
4407:" listed at
4390:
4389:
4385:
4377:
4362:
4280:
4272:
4195:
4187:
4122:
4114:
4023:
4015:
3952:
3933:Newhaven lad
3920:
3912:
3895:Newhaven lad
3874:Newhaven lad
3868:â Preceding
3863:
3857:
3828:, but other
3817:
3809:edit summary
3800:
3793:
3776:
3775:
3764:The article
3763:
3718:
3710:
3685:
3655:
3654:
3646:
3645:
3630:
3622:
3609:
3608:
3600:
3599:
3562:
3561:
3553:
3552:
3537:
3529:
3509:
3508:
3500:
3499:
3475:
3474:
3466:
3465:
3431:
3423:
3396:
3395:
3387:
3386:
3367:
3366:
3358:
3357:
3353:
3341:
3334:
3313:
3277:
3269:
3266:WP:MERGEINIT
3238:
3230:
3194:
3178:
3170:
3133:
3117:
3109:
3081:
3063:
3028:
3022:
3015:
3014:
3010:Did you know
3008:
3002:
2977:
2969:
2927:
2911:
2903:
2878:
2855:
2807:
2799:
2766:, states in
2759:
2739:
2731:
2699:
2690:
2681:
2675:
2642:
2636:
2613:
2606:
2600:
2598:
2571:
2563:
2539:
2531:
2528:Mangotsfield
2514:
2513:
2503:
2501:
2474:
2414:
2406:
2381:
2378:
2375:
2371:
2364:
2360:
2339:CAPTAIN RAJU
2338:
2333:
2325:
2294:Ezra Cricket
2290:
2282:
2254:
2246:
2221:
2219:
2192:
2163:
2162:
2158:
2147:
2132:
2106:
2098:
2082:
2050:
2045:
2037:
2021:
2018:
1999:
1983:
1975:
1970:Hassocks5489
1946:
1938:
1916:
1908:
1870:
1862:
1808:
1792:
1791:
1783:
1782:
1766:
1765:
1757:
1756:
1743:
1724:
1717:
1693:
1658:
1650:
1590:
1579:
1560:
1459:
1451:
1427:
1426:
1418:
1417:
1398:
1382:
1374:
1307:
1304:
1270:
1263:
1219:
1211:
1157:
1139:
1138:
1130:
1129:
1106:
1098:
1077:
1076:
1068:
1067:
1060:
1042:
1034:
1011:
1003:
959:
919:
911:
832:
824:
792:
791:
783:
782:
778:
748:
725:Your version
673:City of York
629:at Bicknacre
625:
615:
614:
606:
605:
582:
571:
570:
562:
561:
542:
541:
533:
532:
495:
494:
486:
485:
464:
457:
440:
439:
431:
430:
416:
408:
383:
382:
374:
373:
359:
358:
350:
349:
335:
327:
303:
302:
294:
293:
272:
211:
203:
180:pedia.org/wi
134:
109:
87:
73:
42:Introduction
30:
29:
27:
20:
5911:Move review
5803:Fabrickator
5751:Fabrickator
5735:Fabrickator
5720:broken link
4741:discussed.
4689:Beare Green
4227:phab:T24251
3949:Declined R3
3909:WP:AFDHOWTO
3030:Cote Bottom
2644:voting page
2328:, from the
2285:, from the
1751:Castle Hill
1198:WP:UKNOWGOV
933:Yngvadottir
902:Yngvadottir
887:Yngvadottir
864:Yngvadottir
815:Yngvadottir
734:Yngvadottir
648:Yngvadottir
633:Yngvadottir
476:August 2010
467:Grassington
162:mirror site
6079:West Ayton
6075:East Ayton
6026:FireflyBot
5889:FireflyBot
5799:Tewkesbury
5696:DuncanHill
5681:DuncanHill
5454:FireflyBot
4878:districts.
4304:WP:CYRSTAL
4296:WP:PANDORA
4256:WP:PANDORA
3905:WP:PRODNOM
3344:Cheltenham
3191:Overthorpe
3101:N1TH Music
3085:N1TH Music
3043:here's how
3027:purchased
2875:Cheltenham
2763:N1TH Music
2628:topic bans
2560:Gloucester
2556:Cheltenham
2076:Eastbourne
1727:FireflyBot
1448:WP:MONTAGE
1300:Cheltenham
1296:Gloucester
1278:Nottingham
135:This is a
89:help pages
84:talk pages
76:Wikipedian
6188:WP:NOPIPE
6010:again or
5873:again or
5817:MOS:DABRL
5761:corrected
5759:. I have
5675:St Blaise
5438:again or
5354:I recall
5341:forwards.
5327:Stortford
4938:Stortford
4798:Gravesend
4722:Stortford
4317:Thryduulf
4242:Thryduulf
4158:Thryduulf
4096:Thryduulf
4073:Thryduulf
4059:Thryduulf
4040:Thryduulf
3964:JalenFolf
3842:consensus
3768:has been
3460:Axborough
2624:site bans
2150:mainspace
1711:again or
1586:Hawkridge
1582:Withypool
1446:There is
1401:Wakefield
1062:This edit
585:Bicknacre
460:this edit
78:! Please
5591:162 etc.
5532:162 etc.
5516:162 etc.
5379:Mertbiol
5363:Mertbiol
5357:SilkTork
5299:Mertbiol
5289:Storford
5250:Mertbiol
5214:Mertbiol
5177:Mertbiol
5109:Mertbiol
5072:Mertbiol
5036:Mertbiol
4984:Mertbiol
4946:Mertbiol
4888:Mertbiol
4845:Mertbiol
4783:Mertbiol
4728:Mertbiol
4681:proposer
4674:Mertbiol
4659:Mertbiol
4581:Mertbiol
4565:Mertbiol
4309:project.
4106:this one
3997:than at
3882:contribs
3870:unsigned
3448:WP:FEB24
3331:Parishes
3224:Merge to
3025:Worthing
2862:Scolaire
1947:Hassocks
1747:Kirklees
1556:Wendover
1395:Collages
1359:Redditch
996:Redditch
204:Archives
121:Chequers
22:Welcome!
6060:DPL bot
6012:request
6008:edit it
5875:request
5871:edit it
5714:On the
5440:request
5436:edit it
5350:closed.
5333:Rupples
4556:Ashtead
4538:and of
4110:Uanfala
3968:WP:RDAB
3903:so per
3787:results
3290:Esemgee
3251:Esemgee
3214:Esemgee
3198:Esemgee
2726:Firefly
2703:firefly
2651:NoACEMM
2530:added.
2046:avoided
2026:) with
1837:Rupples
1818:Rupples
1713:request
1709:edit it
1671:Edwardx
1645:Edwardx
1626:Edwardx
1597:DPL bot
1363:Gosport
1290:Ipswich
1287:Norwich
1275:Lincoln
1272:Gosport
813:, and
669:Esemgee
661:Esemgee
592:convert
529:mess).
509:), and
503:village
480:changed
276:removed
5540:about
5390:Skegby
5338:Skegby
5336:, the
5294:Skegby
5152:Skegby
4929:Skegby
4811:result
4800:, see
4779:UK BMD
4683:, see
4441:Nickps
4373:Eltham
4208:WT:CSD
4036:WT:CSD
3811:or on
3581:copied
3323:(Talk)
2686:that:
2684:motion
2236:plicit
2083:should
1803:Hope @
1523:đđđ˝
1487:đđđ˝
1481:, see
1293:Oxford
1244:đđđ˝
1207:Maldon
1166:đđđ˝
821:Norcot
757:. it:
98:helpme
6073:Both
6058:.) --
5952:draft
5641:draft
5121:Yes.
4369:Draft
4174:than
4108:. As
3420:Order
3416:UKBMD
3065:Z1720
2820:Yamla
2794:Yamla
2778:Yamla
2139:Draft
2074:like
1996:Music
1809:seems
1595:.) --
1281:Derby
1188:Tring
514:sites
511:other
170:pedia
156:pedia
141:pedia
117:Spiel
104:" on
6216:talk
6212:KJP1
6201:talk
6179:talk
6175:KJP1
6164:talk
6141:not
6133:KJP1
6121:talk
6117:KJP1
6092:talk
6077:and
6064:talk
6030:talk
5958:".
5956:Eyre
5923:talk
5893:talk
5834:talk
5807:talk
5774:talk
5757:here
5739:talk
5700:talk
5685:talk
5647:".
5611:talk
5595:talk
5573:and
5560:talk
5520:talk
5458:talk
5403:talk
5367:talk
5330:and
5303:talk
5274:talk
5254:talk
5238:talk
5218:talk
5203:talk
5181:talk
5132:talk
5113:talk
5095:talk
5076:talk
5061:talk
5040:talk
5007:talk
4988:talk
4970:talk
4950:talk
4915:talk
4892:talk
4868:talk
4849:talk
4824:talk
4802:here
4787:talk
4752:talk
4732:talk
4702:talk
4663:talk
4624:talk
4569:talk
4558:and
4511:talk
4507:DBaK
4496:talk
4469:talk
4465:DBaK
4460:this
4445:talk
4375:".
4321:talk
4282:talk
4258:and
4246:talk
4216:talk
4197:talk
4162:talk
4140:talk
4124:talk
4085:talk
4063:talk
4048:talk
4025:talk
3976:talk
3937:talk
3922:talk
3878:talk
3850:talk
3735:talk
3720:talk
3692:talk
3632:talk
3539:talk
3523:PamD
3454:and
3433:talk
3410:PamD
3294:talk
3279:talk
3255:talk
3240:talk
3202:talk
3180:talk
3140:talk
3119:talk
3089:talk
3069:talk
2979:talk
2950:KJP1
2938:talk
2934:KJP1
2913:talk
2886:talk
2866:talk
2838:talk
2824:talk
2809:talk
2782:talk
2774:here
2741:talk
2662:talk
2614:The
2573:talk
2558:and
2541:talk
2487:, a
2483:, a
2446:talk
2416:talk
2388:talk
2298:talk
2256:talk
2205:, a
2201:, a
2145:".
2108:talk
2057:talk
2006:talk
1985:talk
1952:5489
1918:talk
1888:talk
1872:talk
1843:here
1835:and
1833:PamD
1822:talk
1814:PamD
1731:talk
1675:talk
1660:talk
1630:talk
1601:talk
1567:talk
1541:talk
1527:talk
1506:talk
1491:talk
1473:PamD
1461:talk
1442:PamD
1384:talk
1365:and
1314:talk
1298:And
1264:Hi @
1248:talk
1242:. --
1221:talk
1170:talk
1108:talk
1092:PamD
1044:talk
1013:talk
977:talk
960:Hi @
937:talk
921:talk
891:talk
868:talk
834:talk
807:PamD
755:this
738:talk
714:talk
706:talk
695:and
665:talk
646:Hi @
637:talk
556:here
518:town
516:use
507:town
418:talk
397:PamD
337:talk
318:PamD
288:that
286:and
284:this
167:Wiki
153:Wiki
138:Wiki
112:Ϣere
6204:)
6167:)
6149:to
6095:)
6051:.
5913:of
5837:)
5777:)
5722:to
5563:)
5406:)
5277:)
5241:)
5206:)
5135:)
5098:)
5064:)
5010:)
4973:)
4918:)
4871:)
4827:)
4755:)
4705:)
4627:)
4499:)
4285:)
4200:)
4178:or
4127:)
4028:)
4009:or
3960:Jay
3925:)
3862:.
3783:one
3750:of
3723:)
3647:Pam
3635:)
3601:Pam
3554:Pam
3542:)
3501:Pam
3491:URL
3467:Pam
3436:)
3388:Pam
3359:Pam
3282:)
3243:)
3183:)
3164:to
3122:)
3003:On
2982:)
2916:)
2812:)
2744:)
2576:)
2544:)
2506:by
2499:.
2419:)
2259:)
2224:by
2217:.
2111:)
1988:)
1921:)
1875:)
1784:Pam
1758:Pam
1663:)
1588:.
1464:)
1419:Pam
1387:)
1224:)
1131:Pam
1111:)
1069:Pam
1047:)
1016:)
924:)
837:)
784:Pam
607:Pam
563:Pam
534:Pam
487:Pam
432:Pam
421:)
375:Pam
351:Pam
340:)
295:Pam
269:DoB
82:on
6218:)
6181:)
6123:)
6066:)
6032:)
5977:iz
5925:)
5895:)
5809:)
5801:?
5741:)
5702:)
5687:)
5666:iz
5613:)
5605:9
5597:)
5589:.
5522:)
5460:)
5369:)
5305:)
5256:)
5220:)
5183:)
5171:."
5115:)
5078:)
5042:)
4990:)
4952:)
4894:)
4851:)
4789:)
4734:)
4665:)
4644::
4571:)
4513:)
4471:)
4447:)
4394:iz
4323:)
4315:.
4248:)
4218:)
4164:)
4142:)
4087:)
4065:)
4050:)
4005:,
4001:,
3978:)
3939:)
3884:)
3880:â˘
3852:)
3815:.
3798:.
3737:)
3694:)
3584:}}
3578:{{
3494:}}
3488:{{
3318:.
3296:)
3257:)
3227:}}
3221:{{
3204:)
3142:)
3108:.
3091:)
3071:)
3059:.
3045:,
3007:,
2968:.
2966:}}
2960:{{
2940:)
2888:)
2868:)
2840:)
2826:)
2784:)
2711:¡
2707:(
2664:)
2653:}}
2649:{{
2626:,
2518:iz
2448:)
2390:)
2332:!
2300:)
2289:!
2167:iz
2059:)
2034:}}
2028:{{
2008:)
1890:)
1861:.
1824:)
1753:.
1733:)
1677:)
1632:)
1603:)
1569:)
1543:)
1529:)
1508:)
1493:)
1412:}}
1406:{{
1361:,
1316:)
1302:?
1250:)
1172:)
979:)
939:)
910:.
893:)
870:)
809:,
740:)
716:)
691:,
687:,
683:,
679:,
675:,
639:)
595:}}
589:{{
522:OS
505:,
243:,
239:,
235:,
231:,
227:,
223:,
219:,
215:,
101:}}
95:{{
6214:(
6198:(
6177:(
6161:(
6135::
6131:@
6119:(
6089:(
6062:(
6054:(
6028:(
5974:L
5921:(
5891:(
5831:(
5805:(
5788::
5784:@
5771:(
5753::
5749:@
5737:(
5698:(
5683:(
5663:L
5609:(
5593:(
5557:(
5534::
5530:@
5518:(
5456:(
5400:(
5381::
5377:@
5365:(
5301:(
5271:(
5252:(
5235:(
5216:(
5200:(
5179:(
5154:.
5129:(
5111:(
5092:(
5074:(
5058:(
5038:(
5004:(
4986:(
4967:(
4948:(
4912:(
4890:(
4865:(
4847:(
4821:(
4785:(
4775::
4771:@
4749:(
4730:(
4716::
4712:@
4699:(
4676::
4672:@
4661:(
4638::
4634:@
4621:(
4583::
4579:@
4567:(
4532::
4528:@
4509:(
4493:(
4483::
4479:@
4467:(
4443:(
4403:"
4391:L
4319:(
4279:(
4244:(
4214:(
4194:(
4160:(
4153:)
4149:(
4138:(
4121:(
4098::
4094:@
4083:(
4071:@
4061:(
4046:(
4022:(
3990::
3986:@
3974:(
3935:(
3919:(
3897::
3893:@
3876:(
3848:(
3733:(
3717:(
3706::
3702:@
3690:(
3656:D
3629:(
3610:D
3563:D
3536:(
3525::
3521:@
3510:D
3476:D
3430:(
3412::
3408:@
3397:D
3368:D
3292:(
3276:(
3253:(
3237:(
3216::
3212:@
3200:(
3177:(
3154::
3150:@
3138:(
3116:(
3103::
3099:@
3087:(
3067:(
3049:)
3041:(
2976:(
2952::
2948:@
2936:(
2910:(
2900::
2896:@
2884:(
2864:(
2836:(
2822:(
2806:(
2796::
2792:@
2780:(
2738:(
2728::
2724:@
2715:)
2713:c
2709:t
2660:(
2570:(
2538:(
2515:L
2444:(
2413:(
2402::
2398:@
2386:(
2296:(
2253:(
2231:â
2164:L
2105:(
2071::
2067:@
2055:(
2004:(
1982:(
1972::
1968:@
1915:(
1901::
1897:@
1886:(
1869:(
1855::
1851:@
1839::
1831:@
1820:(
1793:D
1767:D
1729:(
1673:(
1657:(
1647::
1643:@
1628:(
1599:(
1591:(
1565:(
1539:(
1525:(
1519::
1515:@
1504:(
1489:(
1475::
1471:@
1458:(
1444::
1440:@
1428:D
1381:(
1328::
1324:@
1312:(
1246:(
1218:(
1184::
1180:@
1168:(
1140:D
1122:(
1105:(
1094::
1090:@
1078:D
1041:(
1027::
1023:@
1010:(
998:/
991::
987:@
975:(
935:(
918:(
904::
900:@
889:(
866:(
831:(
817::
805:@
793:D
749:"
736:(
712:(
704:(
663:(
635:(
616:D
572:D
543:D
496:D
441:D
415:(
399::
395:@
384:D
360:D
334:(
320::
316:@
304:D
245:9
241:8
237:7
233:6
229:5
225:4
221:3
217:2
213:1
186:.
158:,
147:.
70:.
34:!
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
