User talk:ButtonwoodTree - Knowledge (XXG)

302:

industries because of the jews' history. Should this also not be talked about? Well, it should be talked about. And it should also be talked about that jews are not only allowed into banking and insurance today, but they run a lot of the largest institutions (Weill at Citicorp, Jamie Dimon at JP Morgan Chase). What's wrong with tracking this? It was acceptable to track that jews were NOT in banking a hundred years ago, so what's wrong with tracking who's running things now? Same goes for politics - I mean, just look at the jews in the White House - they are running the place - jews are crawling all over the White House - but this never gets mentioned in the press (just as the reasons for 9/11 are never discussed - other than that Mohammed Atta et al did it "because they envy our freedom" (that's what Bush said) and because "they envy the way we live" (that's what Cheney said). No mention is made of Israel or the role of jews in the U.S. promoting American support of Israel. In the White House, the Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten, he's jewish. Dick Chaney's Chief of Staff Lewis "Scooter" Libby (now departed because he got indicted) is jewish. Chaney himself isn't jewish . . . . but his resume states that he was on the Board of Advisors of the "Jewish Institute for National Defense" (gee, I wonder if he might be pro-jewish?). Bush himself became a born-again Christian/Christian zionist in order to control his alcoholism, so he's fervently pro-Israel. Forrmer Undersecretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz - the architect of the invasion of Iraq - he's Jewish (he's now President of the World Bank, where he replaced James Wolfensohn who is jewish). Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bernancke - he's jewish - and of the 6 candidates that Bush considered for the job, 5 were jewish. And before Bernancke, we had Greenspan (who is jewish). And under Nixon we had Arthur Burns - who is jewish (basically, the job of Chairman of the Federal Reserve is now a jewish job). And with Paul Wolfowitz at the DOD, we had Douglas Feith (he's jewish). And Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson, while a Christian Scientist, he made his money with Goldman Sachs, so one would expect him to be pro-jewish. And in the Clinton administration, the Treasury Secretary was Robert Rubin, is jewish (and he's now Vice-Chairman of Citicorp - fellow jew Sandy Weill brought him in). What's wrong with tracking who is jewish? When they were NOT in banking, they complained loudly that they were not in those industries. Are we not allowed to talk about them BEING IN those industries now? And that they are also running the White House, the Federal Reserve, and the World Bank (amongst other institutions). What? Are they embarassed to say that the are jews? Or do they not want it pointed out that they are running key parts of America these days? This is easily talked about and acceptable to point out in Europe, but over in America, it is not politically correct, apparently. That's why you Americans end up doing stupid things like that idiotic peace treaty that got signed under the "Camp David Accords" - you Americans got bamboozled into PAYING Israel $ 2.5 billion a year under that treaty - that's right, Israel wouldn't sign the peace treaty unless they got PAID. And who did the paying? Why, America of course. Why not Europe or, say, Japan? Because if that had ever been proposed, there would have been a huge outcry - we don't pay jews (or anybody else, for that matter) money to sign peace treaties. The Japanese would have laughed at you if you had asked them to pay money to Israel to sign a peace treaty. So you have to pay it. And there is no sunset provision on it - you have to pay them that money forever. WHA-HA-HA-HA!!!!! Suckers. That isn't to say that there isn't a jewish lobby over here in Europe - just look at Spain - the Spanish public overwhelmingly opposed participation in the Iraq invasion - but their gov't (with a jewish lobby pushing it) sent troops anyway against the public's wishes. So, what happens? The muslims blow up the Madrid train system and the Spanish public took to the streets in protest - NOT against the "terrorists", but against their own gov't for taking them into a war that they opposed from the get-go. Berlusconi has also recently cut the number of Italian troops in Iraq because it is causing him political problems due to the overwhelming opposition to it by the Italian public. Then why did Berlusconi do it in the first place if his country didn't want to get involved? Answer - the jewish lobby in Italy. Same thing here in Britain - we had the biggest mass demonstration since WWII against the invasion (82% of the public opposed it), but Blair went and did it anyway? Why? Look at his outside advisors - Lord Levy (jewish), tax lawyer Martin Paisner (jewish), etc. Over here in Europe, we know why they are doing it, because we know who is jewish. You Americans don't know that your country is being run by jews. Why? Because it is politically incorrect to identify people as jewish. Hell, you can't even identify Sandy Weill as being jewish on Knowledge (XXG). But the jews will always remind you that they were excluded a 100 years ago. And they will tell you that there was a limit on the number of jews allowed into Ivy League schools in the 1920's - but they won't tell you that they are about 20% of the Ivy League student population these days, and that they are on the admissions committees and let each other in. Anyway, you Ameicans go right on ahead an spend another trillion dollars on a "war on terror" (in Europe, we consider it a "war on muslims", that there are no such things as "terrorists"). And you go on and do that without knowing why, without being told why you're in that war to begin with. You go ahead and continue to believe that Mohammed Atta did 9/11 because he "envied" you. Idiots, he hated you. Gee, I envy the Swiss and their neutrality - I guess I'm gonna consider flying an airplane into one of their buildings because of my envy. Suckers. You have got to be the biggest idiots to believe what your government has told you. The whole thing - 9/11, the "war on terror", the invasion of Iraq - the whole thing is jewish, and it's been directed by the jews. But you don't know that, because you don't even know who is jewish at the top of your country. You are not allowed to talk about it, or point it out. WHA-HA-HA-HA!!!!! Suckers.

1207:

number of reasons the assertion that 1535 was the sanitarium would seem to be incorrect. Without identifying each, please review the 1976 NY Times article which I cited. This article correctly identifies the facility at 1425 OCR as being the sanitarium. It further indicates that the sanitarium included five "Georgian style buildings", located "well off Old Country Road". A picture of one of these Georgian style buildings is in the article. The building located at 1535 is neither Georgian in style (it was clearly built after the sanitarium), nor is it "well off" OCR, indeed, it is

486:. The idea is that each company has a shared history with American Express, that for instance you can't talk about American Express without talking about Ameriprise, and you can't talk about Ameriprise without talking about American Express. While they are no longer the same company, they're interrelated, and I think it's clear from the way it's stated in the NavBox that they're no longer a part of american express. But if you think there's a way to make it clearer, please let me know. 949: 3376: 3132: 2754: 2702: 2577: 1946: 1212:

when TB was largely under control and not likely to necessitate the development of a new building (which, based on the architecture of 1535, appears to be when it was built). Having said all of this, it is conceivable that when 1535 was built, it was actually used for TB patients (as opposed to general county office space), however, there is no evidence to support this and in any event, when people refer to

898: 830: 770: 3284: 3196: 3048: 2940: 2865: 2631: 2506: 1459: 348:

since the 1970s, Goldman in particular has risen to the pinnacle of investment banking, and Lehman bought the faded Kuhn Loeb. But these late developments do not support the general implication of your statement that all German Jewish investment banks were in league with one another, or had material interrelationships through marriage. This is in distinction to the Warburgs and Kuhn Loeb, who

226: 1520: 1361: 333:. You say in that article "In its early years, intermarriage among the German-Jewish elite was common. Consequently, the partners of Kuhn, Loeb were closely related by blood and marriage to the partners of J & W Seligman, Speyer & Co., Goldman, Sachs & Co., Lehman Brothers and other prominent German-Jewish firms." You cited Stephen Birmingham's "Our Crowd." 340:

banks like Kuhn Loeb, J&W Seligman and the Warburgs clearly occupied one strata - as near equals to Morgan who financed railroads, nation-states and heavy industry - and Lehman and Goldman - as commercial paper dealers, bond dealers and financiers of merchants and retail - occupied another, much lower strata. There are numerous statements to this effect in

3149:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 2771:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 2719:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 2594:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 2246: 2123: 2056: 1005: 1647:

Hello ButtonwoodTree, thanks for contacting me. You can move the article into 20 Exchange Place. Now I know that there is NO STOCK in the buildings name. It was because there was a mistake in the German Wikipedias list of NYs tallest buildings. So I created the article in German (with the STOCK). Now

1624:

Most likely you are right. But often the websites are not true, for example wtc.com says that 1 World Trade Center will open in 2011, although 2013 is correct. But why should they shorten the antenna? I whould increase it to over 1,500ft. Have a look at the John Hancock Center in Chicago, its 1,500ft

1211:

OCR. In addition, you will note that the administrator's home is Georgian in style, lending itself to the argument that it was built at approximately the same time as the rest of the sanitarium, which again, was in the 1930s, when TB was still a major killer that required sanitariums, not the 1960s,

347:

The fact that all these banks were German Jewish houses meant that some marriages must have inevitably occurred between persons somehow affiliated with either side of this divide during this period, and perhaps in the post-War period which the book does not really cover. And it is also the case that

210:

Your accusation of NNPOV regarding the Sanford Weill article is unsubstantiated, and, frankly, rude. If you have evidence to substantiate a claim of nnpov, please provide it. Otherwise, your comments are well outside of the norms of comity and respect due to fellow wikipedians. Additionally, as Weill

178:

into the public domain. Otherwise it is incompatible with Knowledge (XXG)'s copyright policy and may in fact be copyright infringement, which we of course don't want. One way to get around this is for you to read over the other web page, take notes as to the main points, and then re-write the article

1285:

The "Rim of the Woods" purchase is generally poorly documented & may have been included in maps as being part of the Bethpage Purchase. Additionally, some sources seem confused by the deed signing being so much later than the purchase & at least one source has interpreted that as the "Rim of

1270:

At some point we'll have to deal with duplication between articles - but I think this article needs to go up to Old Bethpage getting its own post office (1965) - though not every event until then - but showing the development of the communities. Probably need to include Plainview/Manetto Hill &

1206:

I believe you have made a mistake. The building located at 1535 OCR was a part of the county facility located in that area and was a part of the sale made to Charles Wang, however, the tuberculosis facility, which dates to the 1930s, was located behind both 1535 and the administrator's home. For a

305:

Another reason why the protestant religion of JP Morgan is not a comparable situation - the history of the jews. The jews allegedly got thrown out of the Middle East because they controlled all the capital and lived off interest while everybody else worked. The protestants never had that history.

281:

on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit

169:

Hi! I appreciate your desire to take this tiny article on a very important person and make it into a more complete thing, but you can't just cut and paste material from another website into here unless we have evidence that the author of that material has authorized it for release under the terms of

1782:

I worked on getting a list of the directors of the SIPC from their web site, and the best I could do was the Annual Report for 2009, dated April 30, 2010, with a letter from the chairman and a page with the other six directors shown with photos and with affiliations, but no mention of who appointed

1411:

and a whole host of other guidelines governing the inclusion of lists in articles, this material does not qualify to be included here. Knowledge (XXG) is not an almanac, nor is it a corporate directory. This material is unencyclopedic and does not inform the reader about the subject of the article.

1180:

The site you highlighted is the center for drug and alcohol addiction. The 1535 OCR site was a VA health center, but before that was a TB center. The house behind it was where the administrator lived on site, as the practice of a facility admin living on site was quite common through much of the

339:

However, I continue to think that your statement about the links between Kuhn Loeb on the one hand, and Lehman Brothers and Goldman Sachs is misleading, or at least overstated. The former two banks cooperated closely in their early history, but for nearly all of the period covered by "Our Crowd",

2480:

Sorry about the "Clutch Plague", that's my fault. I have a Google Chrome Extension that changes a phrase to that (as well as others). I usually double check to make sure that my extensions don't screw up my edits, but this one seems to have slipped under the radar. Oops... Thanks for catching it.

1605:

I understood. But why says ctbuh.org and skyscraperpage the other way around? Did the ESB get a completely new antenna in 1984? I belive that only the antennas tip has been increased in 1984. Perhaps the NY-Times mistaked this. However, the building information page at skyscraperpage says: 448.7m

1589:

From where did you learn, that the Empire State Building is 443m (1454ft) tall by pinnacle height. The information on the buildings homepage is not true. Skyscraperpage.com and ctbuh (and many others) say its 1,472ft /448.7m tall. The antenna height has been increases from 443m to 448.7m in 1984.

301:

ButtonwoodTree, you wrote, "I'm not sure what his religion has to do with it. J.P. Morgan isn't identified as a Protestant." ANSWER: Actually, it has a lot to do with it. For example, at the turn of the 19th/20th century, there was an unofficial ban on jews working in banking and the insurance

355:

It is ironic. One of the implications I thought you should avoid (because in this case it is inaccurate) was a suggestion that all Jewish banks were somehow in league with one another. And then I come here to your talk site and, lo-and-behold, I see some nut job with exactly that sentiment. I

1674:

I dont know an administrator here. Perhaps you can contact one (if you know). Re: I wrote an E-Mail to skyscraperpage.com (about the Empire States height). But there is no reaction until now. At this page, several information are false, another example is, that they don´t count the spires on

1755:. I have done as much as I can about Concernedinvestor, including a warning welcome and a comment on the user's talk page. Perhaps this user has some valid points, but right now I do not have time or energy to untangle the edits made. The user should be allowed to make edits which preserve 583:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually

2643:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2877:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

211:

is a living person, the burden is on editors wishing to include information, rather than on editors removing information. You have failed to demonstrate that Weill fufills the definition of a philanthropist and to label him such without substantiation is potentially libelous. --

1842:

He is labeled in multiple photos of that day and the New York Times coverage of the event mentions him and his carriage. A professional rider was used during the race, but I am sure it is Kahn posing for the pictures, you can see the racing driver in the second image. See

923:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 861:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 801:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 1788:), but I am not sure I am up for the challenge of getting enough detail to create articles on the SIPC people. ( This is an important organization. Investors and the public should know more than we have from their annual report or what is currently in the article. -- 489:

With that in mind, would you reconsider your revert? For readers, I see no downside in having the box there, it can only aid them in exploring related topics. It's at the end of the article, after all of the text, so it doesn't get in the way of the article. Thanks!

1783:

them, or what their terms are. The President of the US appoints some of them, and I don't know who appoints the rest. Only one, Michael S. Barr, seems notable enough to have his own article, and the link to him on the US Treasury site doesn't work. <sigh: -->

462:

article. I have a feeling it may be a case of seeing it on your watchlist, clicking on the diff, seeing that an american express template has been added, and reverting it for being out of place, without getting a chance to look at the template itself.

2518:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

1774:

I completely agree with you and am happy to help. Sorry this is such a struggle. This article is very weak and replete with sophomoric editorializations. Some of its statements are so misleading and incomplete, that they border on reckless and

446:

Hi ButtonwoodTree. First, let me thank you for the your wikipedia contributions -- you're one of the few editors who is very active in improving financial services articles, an area that's pretty lacking on wikipedia. And your perseverance on the

179:

yourself from the notes, with a link noting the page which was helpful to you in composing it. In effect, you'd be converting what was previously copyrighted material into material which was free for the world to use, because under U.S. law the

379:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable 29:

they used when adding content. What websites, books, or other places did you learn the information that you added to Lehman Brothers, Kuhn, Loeb Inc.? Would it be possible for you to mention them in the article? Thank you very much. -

1905:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

1663:

Thanks. But I´m not sure to 100% of the Empire States height, so I will start a new section on the discussion page. I will tell you if nessecary. Please move the article 20 Exchange Place into the right name, without the

1625:(457.2m) tall by pinnacle height, although its roof is only 1,127ft (344m) tall, 37m shorter than the ESBs roof. If you´re right, its in fact so, that the ESBs pinnacle has the eqal height as the Willis Towers roof. 3329: 3239: 3091: 2983: 2905: 2671: 2546: 25:, and thanks for the contribution. However, you forgot to add any references to the article. Keeping Knowledge (XXG) accurate and verifiable is very important, and there is currently a push to encourage editors to 2392:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1541:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

3023:

Hi Buttonwood-This edit is 12 years old, however I have a question about it, haha. Do you have proof that the sanatorium, after closing, was "a drug and alcohol rehabilitation center in 1976?" Thanks.

1723:

Appreciate you catching the eternal Mitchell/Mitchel error. And there is no "A" in Olmsted, and Rudolf Anderson is spelt with an "F", not a "PH"! These are chronic misspellings I try to correct... :)

510:

We do not allow "fair use" images of buildings that still exist since it would be posible to create a free alturnative. Aditionaly if you are haveing problems with your upload tags I can help with that.

919:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

857:

797:

1044:

where needed. In the future, you may simply copy and paste these rationales to new image uploads and modify them as necessary. This will insure images comply with policy, saving them from deletion. -

3313:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3223:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3075:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2967:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2889:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2655:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2530:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1150:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

3298: 3209: 3061: 2953: 1300:

It was refreshing to work on an article that was not linked to - I was able to start from scratch on a few topics - but I think it is pretty nearly ready for prime-time & linking now --

1438:

It's difficult to copyright historical facts, so I'll just rewrite the portions of the article (which is mostly origins) which needs rewriting so there isn't any issue along those lines.

1491:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1376: 747: 1687:, inculding the Empire at 1,472ft / 448.7m). I wrote twice to them, but without an answer. Greetings, the U.S. are my favourite country, but unfortunaly I never have been to the U.S. 1487:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

624:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

587:

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

1867: 1973:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

1480:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

912:

but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge (XXG) constitutes fair use. Please go to ] and edit it to include a

1969:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1476:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 359:

In any event, thanks for your numerous valuable contributions in the area of investment banking history. They are useful for a student of the field such as me.

913: 851: 791: 1412:

It will continue to be removed. Any revisions from this point must have a source cited since I suspect you are not editing in this article in accordance with

724: 2832: 2450: 2214: 1087:

It's not hard to find connections between Thomas R. Kuhn and George W. Bush. They're all over the internet. Thomas was a Bush Pioneer. There's your start.

240:. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's 1752: 1683:

as a part of the actual building, so skyscraperpage.com says thy´re only 1,270ft / 387m and 1155ft / 350m tall. But thats false (here the diagramm link:

1142:. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at 1703:

You´re right with the official websites. But a few additional sources are useful, too. But it is important, that those sources are credibly. Greetings,

637: 584:

sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

3442: 3161: 2783: 2731: 2606: 1496: 1154: 1147: 924: 862: 802: 633: 1852: 249: 715: 336:

I have now had a chance to read "Our Crowd" and have to say, it certainly filled in a lot of gaps in my knowledge of investment banking history.

1567:

but within 2 minutes it was threatened with speedy deletion. Kramer is CEO of Griffon Corp. You edited Griffon about 50 times or so. Thanks.

306:

Banking, and being bankers, is an integral part of the jews' history. But you don't want it pointed out that the top bankers are jewish again.

1158: 986: 928: 866: 806: 653: 2828: 2446: 2210: 70: 3352: 3262: 3113: 3005: 2919: 2685: 2560: 2417: 1488: 1230: 1191: 1146:

carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at

920: 858: 798: 1909: 82: 1848: 846:

but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge (XXG) constitutes fair use. Please go to

786:

but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge (XXG) constitutes fair use. Please go to

1084:

Buttonwood, I realize you feel you're an expert, and maybe you are, to a limited extent, but to the family you're still an outsider.

1473: 1109: 591: 39:

Simon, got it. I added a total of three sources, one of which is Knowledge (XXG) itself. How will that be received, do you think?

3446: 1327:

I don't understand the reasons why this article was flagged ? Please advise so that appropriate corrections can be made Thank You

974: 618: 614: 241: 691: 1530: 22: 1784:

Maybe I will get back to this some day. Not before next year. I have done articles on federal government agency appointees (See

1271:

Plainedge a bit more too. I do not think the story can be properly told when it hacked up to fit each separate hamlet article --

1223:

Bravo! Well documented research and convincing evidence. Thanks. I will see if I can find anything more regarding 1535 OCR.

1153:

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

732: 699: 407: 3348: 3258: 3176: 3109: 3001: 2915: 2681: 2556: 2413: 1826: 479: 3322: 3232: 3084: 2976: 2898: 2664: 2539: 1040:. I'll check back in 24-48 hours to see if any expansion has occurred. I've also gone through your image uploads and provided 549: 257: 58: 2443:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2207:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1844: 682: 674: 3434: 3387: 3365: 3145:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2767:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2715:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2590:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1961:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 529:

What is the relivant law or statement from the new york authorities? Many matters of public record are subject to copyright.

261: 2818: 552:

and select the license under which you want to release the photo, and tag the image description page accordingly. Thanks! —

466:

If you take a look at the template, what I've done is add a section for companies that were once part of American Express:

1342: 1122:

I am surprised why you want to omit the fact that the Lehman brothers are of German-Jewish origin. Please explain, thanks

608: 3438: 3150: 2772: 2720: 2595: 1974: 1810:

If you do not believe the Harry M. Rubin page should be a wikipedia page proceed with deletion. Don't continue editing.

1481: 1143: 1009: 383:. If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please write 54:

You can sign your name on talk pages by using " ~~~ " for your username and " ~~~~ " for your username and a timestamp.

2404:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

1372: 269: 76: 47:

Hi there. Welcome to Knowledge (XXG). I hope you like it here and stick around. If you want, you can drop us a note at

3421: 3334: 3244: 3096: 2988: 2910: 2676: 2551: 2409: 1526: 1464: 948: 187:

can be. Anyway, I hope that makes sense to you, let me know if there are any questions that you have. See our page on

1468:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1759:

while questioning SIPC policy, especially if they are backed by inline citations from reliable secondary sources. --

2791: 2431:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2199:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1034: 396: 847: 838: 823: 575: 3383: 3369: 455: 436: 274: 253: 237: 100: 48: 3141: 1564: 1421: 1234: 1195: 1166: 989:. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. 3310: 3220: 3072: 2964: 2886: 2652: 2586: 2527: 376: 1957: 2270:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

2146:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

2079:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

1737: 1729: 1368: 787: 778: 763: 2822: 2814: 2763: 1814: 1330: 1226: 1187: 1097: 961: 957: 746:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 451:

page is impressive, I certainly wouldn't be able to keep it up, and it's helping to keep the article NPOV.

380: 188: 252:

for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant

3450: 2405: 1417: 245: 94: 2806: 2787: 2711: 2092:

pieces of legislation during the 2013 session. None were passed, for a success rate of 0%. <ref: -->

1105: 1053: 494: 1902: 1891: 1538: 1138: 909: 843: 783: 641: 602: 579:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 545: 64: 1550:}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ 1101: 108: 2805:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2362: 2185: 2135: 2107: 1680: 1676: 467: 352:

to some degree in league with one another through intermarriage at the highest levels of the bank.

130: 3292: 3203: 3055: 2947: 2873: 2639: 2514: 2496: 2381: 2372: 3458: 3172: 2486: 2337:

www.oysterbaytown.com/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC={F5EDEC47-D633-40FB-BE56-1D0F60C3B0EC}&DE=

2259: 2200: 1822: 1793: 1764: 1572: 1375:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 1162: 1068: 1013: 154: 143: 3306: 3216: 3068: 2960: 2882: 2648: 2523: 2401: 2385: 2169:

09/nyregion/09tower.html?pagewanted=print NYTimes:To Find 1 Beacon Court, Better Ask for Bloomberg

1966: 1408: 752: 136:

Can you please add sources for this article as well, and any other articles you create? Thanks. —

2266:

by modifying 1 ""s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just

2166:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/nyregion/09tower.html?pagewanted=print NYTimes:To Find 1 Beacon

2159:

portfolio/property/731-lexington-avenue/10/overview vnony.com:731 Lexington Avenue] </ref: -->

1926: 1878: 1733: 1725: 118: 1319:

They are going down right? (you can reply on this page) Lotsofissues 04:01, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

2098:

http://open.nysenate.gov/legislation/sponsor/krueger?filter=year:2013; http://www.nysenate.gov/

3417: 2848: 2466: 2230: 2040: 2027: 1708: 1692: 1653: 1630: 1611: 1595: 1443: 1391: 1338: 1253: 960:. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Knowledge (XXG) takes 3318: 3228: 3080: 2972: 2894: 2660: 2535: 2397: 2389: 1970: 1756: 1477: 1413: 88: 26: 3341: 3251: 3103: 3029: 2995: 2314:

After a period of significant increases in classroom space in the 1950s and '60s<ref: -->

1945: 1305: 1291: 1276: 1261: 1045: 471: 233: 192: 3404: 3321:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3314: 3231:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3224: 3083:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3076: 2975:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2968: 2897:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2890: 2663:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2656: 2538:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2531: 2400:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2393: 1990:, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a 1987: 647: 403: 2739: 2614: 2358: 2354: 2250: 2204: 2181: 2127: 2103: 2060: 2023: 1993: 1915: 1845:

http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9905E2D9163DE633A25755C2A96F9C946296D6CF

1785: 1547: 1504: 1401: 1041: 1017: 979: 475: 459: 440: 388: 362: 291: 216: 85:

tell about the principles we operate on. It's important, but don't try to read it all now.

3396: 3146: 2768: 2716: 2591: 1962: 1469: 317:

I am shocked at what the troll at 80.41.24.77 just wrote. Please spare other users your

2825:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 2311:

Plainview is split between the [[New York's 2nd congressional district|2nd congressional

3454: 3165: 2482: 2432: 1818: 1789: 1760: 1568: 1551: 931:. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. 869:. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. 809:. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. 662: 558: 356:

created a separate user talk page for 80.41.24.77 in case anyone has comments. I did.

278: 138: 3403:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be

897: 829: 769: 2839:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2457:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2343:

2B4A2912-BFDC-4265-BA6B-997B830AE593 Town of Oyster Bay- Parks Division]</ref: -->

2221:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1919: 1871: 1382: 163: 2001:

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.

1870:. Feel free to provide any additional evidence there. Thanks for the heads-up! -- 2844: 2840: 2462: 2458: 2226: 2222: 2036: 1704: 1688: 1649: 1626: 1607: 1591: 1439: 1387: 1334: 1123: 410:. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 3283: 3195: 3047: 2939: 2864: 2630: 2505: 2304:

http://www.police.co.nassau.ny.us/Precincts.aspx?id=10#content_3 NCPD Precinct Map

1458: 1030:

For the time being, I've removed the speedy deletion request and replaced it with

286:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- 630:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

399:

explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

3025: 2440: 2436: 2068: 1519: 1301: 1287: 1272: 1257: 1021: 990: 932: 870: 810: 483: 448: 412: 248:

among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See

204: 31: 2353:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

1684: 1360: 520:

Please provide a source for your claim that the picture is not under copyright.

225: 3462: 3356: 3266: 3181: 3117: 3033: 3009: 2923: 2852: 2795: 2743: 2735: 2689: 2618: 2610: 2564: 2490: 2470: 2421: 2366: 2234: 2189: 2111: 2044: 1933: 1885: 1856: 1830: 1797: 1768: 1741: 1712: 1696: 1657: 1634: 1615: 1599: 1576: 1508: 1500: 1447: 1425: 1395: 1346: 1309: 1295: 1280: 1265: 1238: 1199: 1170: 1071: 1058: 1024: 1020:}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. 993: 935: 873: 813: 756: 667: 563: 533: 524: 514: 497: 430: 365: 330: 295: 287: 220: 212: 195: 157: 121: 34: 1908:

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for

1866:

Based on your comments at my talk page, I filed a new SPI report, located at

2810: 657: 580: 553: 530: 521: 511: 2176:

is a {{convert|1400000|sqft|abbr=on}} glass ] on the East Side of [[Midtown

1184:

Please provide your informational sources regaridng the highlighted site.

153:

Brian, source is Dewey's bio, located at link provided, www.deweydk.com.

1668:

One question: Are you from the U.K or the U.S.? Greetings from Germany.

3325:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3235:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3087:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2979:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2901:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2667:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2542:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1912:, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided. 1004: 3302:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3213:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3065:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2957:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2388:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

908:. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under 842:. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under 782:. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under 2263: 2139: 2072: 1534: 329:

Anyway, I wanted to continue a discussion that indirectly came up in

1216:

sanitarium, they are referring to the 1930 complex identified above.

964:

very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the

1067:

Thank you for your help AuburnPilot. It is very much appreciated.

1256:. I welcome your input on details, insertions, deletions, etc. -- 1012:

notices from articles you have created yourself, as you did with

3338:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3248:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3100:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2992:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2320:{{cite news |url= http://select.nytimes.com/mem/archive/pdf?res= 598: 171: 3328:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

3296:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

3238:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

3090:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

2982:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

2904:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

2670:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

2545:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

2008:

the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click

985:

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the

972:

of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a

277:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three 3207:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

3059:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

2022:

If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off

3374: 3130: 2752: 2700: 2575: 1944: 1518: 1377:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Perecman & Fanning

1359: 947: 896: 828: 768: 224: 1453:

Orphaned non-free media (File:Division Avenue HS Logo.JPG)

1998:

template, along with your question, beneath this message.

2951:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

325:

Kuhn, Loeb links to other German-Jewish investment banks

3445:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

3427:

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing

3309: