User talk:Butseriouslyfolks/Archive 2

768:. There are several criteria discussed in the guideline but the only concrete test is whether the company been the subject of secondary sources which are reliable and independent of the subject. Let's say that a very stubby article on a mid-sized company is put on AfD which cites two independent, reliable sources. Ten editors comment, all of whom are presumably familiar with WP:COMPANY and none of whom are sock puppets or new or IP users. Six of them review the article and say either "Notable company" or "meets WP:COMPANY" but with no further explanation. Two of the four others say "nn company", one says "nn private company, sales levels not known" and the last says "nn, fails WP:COMPANY guidelines". You seem to be saying that the six users who looked at the article, understood the WP:COMPANY guidelines and succinctly expressed their judgment should be disregarded because they have not explained HOW the company met the guideline, while the four who !voted to delete can be excused from any obligation to justify their reasoning. Therefore, an admin could reasonably view the resulting discussion as a consensus to delete. Please tell me you did not mean what you said. -- 3048:

of identifiable individuals, governments, logos, initials, emblems, trademarks, or entities for any commercial purposes or to express or imply any endorsement or association with any product, service, entity, or activity. You may not create obscene or scandalous works, as defined by federal law at the time the work is created, using the Media Elements. You must indemnify, hold harmless, and defend Microsoft from and against any claims or lawsuits, including attorneys’ fees, that arise from or result from the use or distribution of Media Elements as modified by you. You must include a valid copyright notice on your products and services that include copies of the Media Elements. You may not permit third parties to distribute copies of the Media Elements except as part of your product or service.

2892:(which is also somewhat POV), a chonological list and an alphabetical list. I have added a lot of operations to the alphabetical listing and have been updating it faithfully but I haven't updated the counter insurgency or the Chonological listing much. Before I do I recommend that we consider other methods. I figured out how to add a column sort function and added it to the Alphabetical listing. I recommend the other 2 articles be merged into the alphabetical listing and then we can rename the alphabetical listing to something more appropriate like Iraq Military Operations since 2003 perhaps. I added a blurb on the discussion page and recommended the merge for the chronological list and the counter insurgency operations page. You seem to do a lot with the Iraq war articles what do you think? -- 811:

standard (i.e., "white is black") that an administrator can look at and understand better that a mere editor. To put it in personal terms, as someone who has four times the number of mainspace edits that you have and and has been an editor for more than four times as long, it is hard for me to accept that somehow bestowing the magic buttons on you makes you better suited than me or for any other editor to determine whether the subject of an article is notable. I am sorry, but the world is not black and white, it is full of greys. When you look at a grey and see "white" and I look at a grey and see "black", who are you to say that seven of "me" are wrong and six of "you" are right? Certainly not the deletion policy as it is written now.

2525:

letter to Wiki this morning, complaining about this whole little disagreement, I mentioned that the anonymity of the internet is why more academics don't use Wiki or take it seriously. As a young(er) scholar, I'm trying to promote Knowledge to the older generation. But this whole delete my page thing just makes me want to become an anti-wiki advocate. Look, I hate POV articles, especially ones that attack people. This is why I wanted to take my OWN info and put it on my OWN page. That way, with any edit I make, EVERYONE knows who made it. I'm not going to hide my objective scholarship from anyone. Ironically, by deleting my USERPAGE, you get rid of my personal resume, which does away with (some) my credibility when making changes.

577:(sorry for the split up discussion). I didn't think approaching you directly was appropriate (it might seem like coercion, implying that I won't oppose you if you withdraw your endorsement of the deletion). Honestly, I can't get too worked up about the loss of an article on one high school half way around the world but I care very much about consensus. It appears that we simply have a very fundamental difference about the deletion policy, consensus and on what grounds an admin can ignore opinions. I am certainly willing to talk if you think it is appropriate, either before or after your RfA runs its course (but not now because it is 12:40 a.m. in Chicago and I am going to bed). -- 2810:'s disciples like add negative comments to any news story that mentions the SDNHM and to do anonymous wikipedia editing on the SDNHM's page, because they feel that someone at the SDNHM edited Dr. Golb's page, causing it to be locked. So, the DSS page is where the battle is now taking place. So far, no one has messed with the Qumran page, which I believe is fair to all parties. It may only be a matter of time. (I HATE anonymity! It actually makes me dislike whoever is doing it. Anywho...) I haven't touched the DSS page yet, but if this crap keeps up, I'll begin editing there, and I never sleep ;-) 4395:

were someone notable’s secretary, assistant, or gardener, and with no claim independent of their employer for notability. It seems to me though that an agent might be a peculiar case in that an agent is important, and I would think notable, if they represent notable clients. Isn’t that the case as to how one would determine if an agent were an important/notable person in their field? So I suppose that’s one question I’d appreciate your thoughts on. As for the particulars for Hellmer, if indeed an agent’s notability is determined by their clients, as would appear to be the case for the WP entry on

113:"Sehr geehrter Panjasan, ich bedaure, dass ich Ihnen nicht schon früher Nachricht geben konnte, aber die Abklärung hat sich - obwohl eigentlich einfach - hingezogen. Inzwischen habe ich das Okay von ITAG und ich bin ebenfalls einverstanden. ITAG hat Rechte an dieser Publikation, weil sie mir ein Honorar bezahlt haben. Ihre Zustimmung ist an die Bedingung geknüpft, dass die Publikation, in welcher der Artikel erschienen ist, zitiert wird. Ich hoffe, es ist für Sie kein Problem dies sicherzustellen. Mit freundlichen Grüssen G. Buntz" 2115: 31: 705:(5) - The closer didn't even claim that there was a consensus to delete. He merely said that "Without encyclopedic content, this article is a clear violation of the very 1st pillar of Knowledge." By implication, he was deciding what is encyclopedic and what is not, regardless of the consensus. In his explanation on Deletion Review, he did explain that he disregarded the "all schools are inherently notable" argument. 872:

RfA on this subject, simple declarative sentences are not copyright-able, if they convey only facts, with no real creativity. I'm sure the sentence "George W. Bush is the 43rd President of the United States" has occurred in print a million times by now, but it is copyright-able by no one. In any event, the article was a clear CSD A7 -- resorting to a questionable copyvio claim was not the best choice. Best wishes,

1511: 2332:

HOWEVER my job as I understand it is to assist in the protection of wikipedia. For those edits that relate to this matter - in my opinion DreamGuy needed to be blocked so that the process of deletion or otherwise of this image could be dealt with, without having to battle his continuing nose thumbing at the Good Faith decisions being made - especially with regards listing the matter at

3524: 3549: 1755: 1674:

community today interprets the deletion policy in that manner. You may be right and I may be wrong as to the interpretation of the policy, but until it is more clearly resolved, I strongly urge you to check with other more experienced admins before you start applying your policy to delete unsourced articles despite consensus that the article should be kept. --

676:(4) - All of the comments at the AfD in issue essentially addressed the issue of notability. The 7 "keeps" essentially said the school was notable (a few of whom said all schools were notable) and the 6 "deletes" said that it was not. In all honesty, neither side contributed much specific commentary. No one raised issues in the AfD about the 2944:

image. Which, I think should be allowed as a free image or as "author released". I am not trying to make excuses or end run around the rules, I am honestly trying to put a template on the image that works, I am just at a loss as to which one and am at a loss as to how to get permission from an author that could literally be anywhere. -

4385:. Is it a matter of explicitly asserting notability in some fashion? I'd assumed that an agent, given the critical role of agents, was significant if they represented significant authors, and that this was an area usefully addressed and expanded in WP. Certainly Dürrenmatt was a significant author. Any clarification much appreciated. 744:

are a very good editor and likely would make an excellent administrator in most respects. But I will oppose any nominee who believes that an administrator is not bound by consensus {except in those limited situations where some specific policy (copyvio, NPOV, WP:BIO, etc...) gives him or her the right to overrule consensus). --

2100:. Appropriately enough, it's listed on July 14. You might not want to read the essay I turned my comment into, but I think there are some interesting points there about Knowledge policy regarding closing admins. Again, I couldn't blame you or anybody for not wanting to delve into what amounts to an essay. Cheers! 2593:, and thought the IP had created the entry and redirected it, and was just generally being trollish. I should have looked at the history of the article first, but didn't. After you deleted my speedy tag I was in the process of requesting a name change, but luckily I googled first and found that the name was 1130:

monkey dance is why I rarely vote at RfA, though I watch it. On the chances when I vote oppose, it is because, unfortunately, the monkey dance is the way RfA works. If other people have decided to make adminship a big deal that is the way I have to treat candidates until a better RfA system comes out.

375:. My search didn't find that potential copyvio...care to share your secret *grin*! In any case, I have noted on the article talk that the user-submitted entry on the website where the potential copyvio exists has the same signature as was placed on the original AFC submission, which you can see here: 4876:

and read through the links you included. I do not understand a lot of it. There is too much technical legal terms. Is there a more straightforward way for me to understand this? If I was able to contact Imre Solt, what would I need to ask him to make sure that I can use his images and put them on

4693:

Thank you for taking the time to participate at the discussion in my Request for Adminship. Unfortunately the nomination did not succeed, but please rest assured that I am still in full support of the Knowledge project. I listened carefully to all concerns, and will do my best to incorporate all of

4394:

Thanks for your reply on my page. As a more experienced WP person I’d appreciate it if you could give me your thoughts on this, and tell me if you think this rises to the appropriate level of notability to create an entry or not: I understand that notability is not inherited, if, for example, someone

2955:

OK, Creative Commons aside for a moment, since most of these are released on sites like 4chan, among others, could it be possible to say that it is public domain, since it was released on a site like that. Most end up on sites like icanhascheezburger.com, but they start out on the "chan" sites. So,

2241:

This images has been deleted probably some 20 times now under various names.... no fair use, not cover art that was used as cover, needs a speedy delete as recreation of deleted image, and the guy who keeps uploading it needs to get blocked so he knows not to pull this crap.... I mean, seriously, how

1369:

because the sources, while reliable, may not be multiple, independent, could still meet consensus in a deletion debate and therefore survive. I see no justification anywhere for overturning consensus simply based on notability concerns. Have I missed some rule or common practice? Please tell me, what

1246:

Your conduct is inappropriate and in breach of Knowledge guidelines. It could also be regarded as being mean. If you want to conduct yourself in that way, peple are going to describe you in the manner that you act. Look in the mirror, and your conduct is clearly meanm, and you are unrepentant in your

824:

I am sorry that we disagree on such a fundamental issue but I am happy that we have at least clarified that there is a gaping chasm between us and it is not merely semantics. I do wish you the best of luck with your RfA and hope that as an admin you will at least remember our discussion when you are

543:

since I completely rewrote it? I added an info box, additional sourcing, and I am curious to what you think of it now, since you saw it when it was first up, warts and all! I would appreciate feedback on the work I have done since then. I am trying to tie the 5 articles I wrote in that series into

538:

I was recently nominated for adminship, and when I went to the page, I saw you were also nominated. I supported your nomination strongly - your work with me is proof you are dilegent, willing to listen to all viewpoints, and a good editor. Good luck on the admin nomination - you have my support, as

4174:

had been tagged with a warning that it lacked source information for longer than seven days before I added the speedy deletion tag. You seem to have replaced the license with the {{pd-art}} tag but, correct me if I'm wrong, the PD-Art does not apply to three-dimensional works of art, as they usually

3746:

to locate more images from the site. Unless Mattythewhite can provide some kind of evidence that he's taking photos for the *.rivals.net websites, we need to consider the possibility that he has not taken any of these images. I thought it best to check in with you first, because chasing down sources

3047:

You may not sell, license or distribute copies of the Media Elements on a stand-alone basis or as part of any collection, product or service where the primary value of the product or service are the Media Elements. You may not use or distribute any of the Media Elements that include representations

3025:

The image contains minor things such as ship, symbol, or human icons, arrows. etc. Every graphics program includes things like these, from Photoshop, to low-end freeware art programs. Even word processing software has symbol fonts. It does not sell, license etc any product or service or have primary

1482:

I took another look at your note "just to clarify" at the bottom of my last comment at the deletion review. I see what you mean. I removed anything that I couldn't footnote because, in this case, I thought it would make my case stronger. If someone added some of that information back, I'd just add a

1171:

Kindly note that I have read your response. You acted capriciously in deleting sectionsd of the article. Your conduct was not and continues not to be "civil". I find it incredible that you now complain that my conduct was not "civil" in responding to your own hostile conduct! I suggest you look in a

1129:

You'll do fine as an editor I'm sure, and if you get the admin over objections, I'm sure you'll do just fine with that as well. I'm one of those that still believe that being an admin should be no big deal, just a few tools, and lots of editors should be admins without the monkey dance at RfA. The

743:

I am not judging your future actions by this one DR. I am basing my opinion based on the fact that you have now stated three times (on DR, on your RfA and on my Talk page) that your view of the power of an administrator is fundamentally different on AfD than what I believe is proper. I believe you

737:

article based on his or her decision about the encyclopedic nature of the article, then lets get rid of the pretense that consensus matters, let's turn deletion review into a content review (since process doesn't matter) and let's stop pretending that adminship is "no big deal" and admit that admins

4667:

Hi, these images can't stay. I reviewed the links you listed at Image talk:Villa on the Palm Jumeirah on 28 January 2007 Pict 3.jpg. When Public Domain was described to Imre Solt, it was specified as noncommercial. Noncommercial licenses are not sufficient for Knowledge. Also, Imre's response ("You

3911:

Hey, don't worry about all the tags in my talk page. Like you said, at the time I uploaded them, I didn't thought that such a strict copyright policy was required, and it's hard to keep track of how many images I've uploaded. Thanks anyway, and I'll be sure to check if I can get permission for some

2943:

I guess what I am having trouble with is that CC 2.5 is allowed, but CC 3.0 isn't and that confuses me. When I first uploaded the picture, I put it as "not sure" on the tag, but with the lolcat pictures as common as they are on the internet, it is really is impossible to tell who made which lolcat

2481:

you didn't touch my page last night. Did you just miss it? Or are you just being an ars? seriously, i don't want to get into a confrontation, but good grief! first you delete my page. you can obviiously see that i'm the same dude as on my own website. but that's not good enough. you then have

1105:

Hi. Thanks, I saw that, but don't think it's worth hashing out on the RFA page, since this only will attract more attention to something that is probably minor. My problem is that you've done so little work on articles, and the one where you've done the most is a bit problematic. Now, the subject

4474:

You might also want to read my comments on TechnoFaye's talk page over the balacnce between policing WP policy and the right to free speech... and my concerns that cautions and blocks might being used in some instances to effectively shut people up. This next bit is not directed at you but at the

3508:

Yes, don't give me a chance to edit the article to make it right (like verifying the claims with another source, and altering the content to make it more original) just delete it completely so I have to do two times as much work. There's a difference between following the letter of the law and the

2014:

Well, I thought about it and thought about it and thought about it and then, just now, finally went over to the page to actually vote for you because, while we disagree most of the time we interact with each other, I've always found you pretty open-minded and your disagreements have been courteous

1141:. That shows you think. That's an important thing - I'm sure you'll do whichever way RfA goes. If it fails - write some more articles, research a few "citation neededs" in old articles and participate on talk pages so people can see you think. That'll get people to the next RfA like a magnet. 871:

The article contained two sentences, as well as the membership roster of the organization (in a different format than the original text.) What little creative element that was present might have fixed by re-writing, although I maintain that no legally-cognizable element existed. As I say in your

2524:

In the mean time, I'M going to write something to put back on MY USERPAGE. (Fear not, not the Robert R. Cargill page.) I do want to write something that I PERSONALLY wrote, - in the first person - to let others know who is actually making edits on Wiki. (I despise the anonymity of wiki. In my

2384:

Again, read the pages. How can I plagerize myself. I followed the dispute guidelines, and you blanked me anyways. I mean, some little wiki patrol dude suggested I was a candidate for copyright infringement, I put the dispute tag, sent the email, and instead of waiting for the procedeure to run

2331:

and I agree totally. Whilst DreamGuy may not be able to accept that my message to him as detailed above was positive - I reiterate here again for all and sundry that I believe he is an otherwise good editor that was confronted by enormous frustration over the image he has been trying to delete.

2319:

and noting that DreamGuy has been warned before and blocked before, and most importantly that whatever any admin did DreamGuy would revert, I blocked him for a period which I considered at the time to be commensurate with his previous block and the continued reversions. To the extent that others

894:

appropriate CSD reason in your deletion log entry ("A1/A7/G11" is something a type fairly often every day, for nearly-incoherent company spam!) This way, the editor involved knows all of the problems he'll need to address if he recreates the article. Also, it makes it much easier to sustain the

4049:

I have explained how this category is unappropriate. It is nonsenical category with one goal and that is spreading nationalist propaganda of a certain member. This member also has several sockuppets and is involved in heavy diruptions all over Knowledge. You can see several account this user has

2298:

Please assume good faith in relation to tagging an image for Speedy Delete. The reason that two (and now 3 admins) did not agree with your tag was made more and more obvious to you. Quite simply your request was polluted with a non-neutral POV and did not nothing to assist us in attending to the

624:

administrators can disregard opinions and comments if they feel that there is strong evidence that they were not made in good faith. Such "bad faith" opinions include those being made by sock puppets, being made anonymously, or being made using a new userid whose only edits are to the article in

4408:

which lists Hellmer as his agent. If these are sufficient as to cites, at least to create an initial short entry, I suppose the core question is whether in the case of an agent notability is established by having been a sufficiently noteworthy agent that they represented noteworthy, significant

1673:

I agree that we collectively need to do a much better job citing sources in articles and I might even support a policy (to be implemented gradually) that would make lack of reliable sources (or at least external links to reliable sources) a deletion criteria. However, I do not believe that the

1665:

I have spent more than an hour reading past discussions on the topic of deleting articles solely because they lack sources. While there are clearly some strong proponents of your position, I cannot find anywhere your position has obtained consensus of the community. For example, there is much

810:

I had honestly hoped that our discussion would lead me to the conclusion that you do understand and value consensus and that the perceived differences were due to how our views were communicated. However, the more we chat the more I understand that you clearly believe notability is an objective

655:

remember that a reason which arguably could be classified as an "argument to avoid", can still have some valid points in it. For example, if a person argues for why an article is WP:INTERESTING, and the arguments for "interesting" are also reasonable arguments for "encyclopedic", it is wrong to

2629:

Hi again. Thanks for your quick feeback. I'd be very happy if you could put all of them in subpages of my user page. I'm the only one who's working on all Top 14 contestants so it's all very hard to manage all of them at once, but I'll be sure to continue working on them to hopefully prove the

796:

say "If appropriate sources cannot be found delete the article despite the consensus of the community to the contrary because they obviously do not understand the concept of notability." Nor does it say that if sources don't appear during the process, then delete. It says "the merits will be

4403:

described as "the best of us," was most concerned with the problems of the working class and the spread of fascism and anti-Semitism in Europe and the United States from the 1920s through the 1940s.’ so I could use that as a cite for an author Hellmer represented, and which author is deemed

1394:

I agree that WP:N does not trump consensus. I agree that if an article is sourced, "article shows subject is notable" !votes are perfectly valid and, if they constitute consensus, they prevail. This is so regardless of the quality or nature of the sources. If, however, there are no sources

763:

be thrown out. What I am saying is that the community should determine notability, not the admin. In some cases there are guidelines and in some cases (schools being a notable one) there has not even been enough consensus to form guidelines. Let's take one where some guidelines exists,

3029:

Others will not be able to extract the elements per se because it is a screenshot of a powerpoint slide not the slide itself. The only thing is this blurb from Mircosoft: "You must include a valid copyright notice on your products and services that include copies of the Media Elements."

2778:

Hello. I'm confused as to why this page was deleted. I created the page and no ((prod)) tag was ever added to the article - it was deleted without any edit forewarning such deletion. I would like this page to be reinstated as it contains a lot of information, none of which is found in

1395:

whatsoever, WP:N cannot be satisfied, no matter how many editors believe it is, because of the requirements of WP:V. Therefore, such a consensus could be overridden by WP:V. Do you understand my reasoning? If so, does it make any sense? -- But|seriously|folks 19:10, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

3181:

Thank you for clarifying such policies on images such as kelly bundy's and all,but didn't you for example tag the image: Al bundy couch pose2.jpg with the same tag even though info on that image are MUCH less than the ones i provided??or do u just have a habit of tagging my images

4399:, I’ve managed to locate references on the web to Hellmer having represented John L Spivak, whose papers are collected at Syracuse University. The entry at Syracuse University’s library identifies Spivak himself as ‘an investigative reporter and author whom fellow muckraker 4826:

Your reply noted - Unhelpful. Your speed of action - Unhelpful. What risk is there of the University of Exeter taking a copyright action against WP within 24 hours of the alleged violation? I think the Institute of Cornish Studies has better things to do with their time.

2505:

It's meant to be funny, not vandalism. It's a badge of honor. I know you're just trying to do your job. I know that I am frustrated. I thought I'd use some humor to make the situation a little lighter. Delete it if you want, but i thought it was cool for both of us.

908:

As for the copyvio issue, all I can ask is that you remain aware that G12 deletions in cases where only one or two sentences might infringe are likely to be controversial. Think hard before you pull the trigger on them, and don't be afraid to consult others. Best wishes,

109:

Agreement to publish the translation as previously referenced in my contribution obtained from author and his employer on 2007-06-26, but I have decided not to publish this under the GFDL, since no modification of this publication would be reasonable or could be accepted.

2270:

A further four days later, again just as a part of my admin role (see history of my admin work for that day) I came across the renewed speedy request, again with the above rationale. Confronted by no more information, I removed the speedy noting in the edit summary:

1155:

It appears you misunderstand the meaning of copyright! There is no copyright in facts! Also, you have alleged that I copied material from another copyright article. Some of the information you deleted did not appear in that article, and hence I refute the allegation.

4668:

can use free") is too ambiguous to constitute proper license here. I suggest you review WP:COPYREQ for the most efficient way to obtain and confirm permission. Also, per WP:IUP, watermarked images are not permitted. -- But|seriously|folks 00:27, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

889:

No real worries. :) The copyright issue on which we continue to disagree is a narrow one (it would apply only to very short articles, often deletable under other criteria anyway.) Whenever you do become an admin, whether sooner or later, it's a good idea to put

4730:

Since you have been so kind to help me with the copyrights of photos, I hope you will be able to help me with something else. There are photos on a Malayalam site and I tried to put them on the English site. But, it did not work. The pictures can be found at

4619:

I concur. Thanks so much for your time. It wasn't an issue of "ganging up" on the editor, but proving that as a community we will take time to consider, and will not make unilateral decisions - something that we have clearly done in this case. Thanks again !

1176:

Your proposed solution is not acceptable, in that you continue to allege infringement of copyright. I require that allegation to be retracted, and that you apologise for making an unfounded and improper allegation which could be regarded as being defamatory.

2388:

I'm following all of the procedeures that wiki has in place, and you deleted me (or wtf you call it - blanked?) anyways. Please put it back and let the administrator that got my email do his/her job instead of taking this into your own hands? Please?

4676:

and look at Posts 350 and 352. Does this give anyone permission to put his pictures onto Knowledge? And if it is allowed, would we be required to crop the watermark out of the photos? Thank you for taking time to help me solve this little dilemna.

2227:

For the record I do not get upset by comments made towards me on wikipedia. If you feel that I have, those feelings are incorrect, and I wish to go on the record as saying that I do not have any personal issue with or feelings against DreamGuy in any

2359:

How can I plagarize myself? If I am Robert R. Cargill (email me at bob@bobcargill.com and I'll prove it), how can I be in violation of infringing on something I wrote? And why are you deleting and not waiting for the 'dispute' to register?

4753:

I apologize. I thought the copyright deletion explanation was for the picture. I've been fighting fanatic deleters and vandals recently and I jumped the gun. Please understand that it was the desire to improve Knowledge with which I acted.

4035:

Why are you refusing speedy deletion of "Former Towns of RSK 1991-95" category? This category is against Knowledge rules as it has no value and above all is offensive. Also the same category was created two times before that and both times

3599:, but abandoned the name because of a user. Moved to this one, but the editor I abandoned my original username because of tracked me down. So, it was all for not. My question is, can I get the edit history and other information from the 3258:

I scanned the image. The image was taken by my mother on an old camera. I have her consent for its usage, or is it more comfplicated than that? Sorry, the St James Park image was taken by my brother who gave me the usage of the image too..

210:. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so. 2488:

why can't YOU wait until it's resolved. why didn't YOU put the warning on my user page instead of just deleting it? huh? you blanked my page, but then DELETED my user page. did you miss it last night, or are you just being difficult?

3995:

Hi can you help me out on the instruction? I really don't know what they mean by contacting "permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org"? Do I use my real actual email and someone forward the approved permission to <email address removed:

789:

If appropriate sources cannot be found: ... For cases where you are unsure about deletion or believe others might object, nominate the article for the articles for deletion process, where the merits will be debated and deliberated for 5

1829:

Congratulations! You will make an outstanding admin! Did you see that Stillstudying voted for you? I was proud of him, he is developing into a good editor, more civil, and he has always been willing to work. ANYWAY, congratulations

1347:. Please take a look and reconsider, but I think this deletion review will close today or early tomorrow, so please don't delay, act now and take advantage of this limited-time offer! I've appreciated your being open-minded in the past. 2674:

yes, i uploaded them as mine, he took them but i figured he wouldnt object if i uploaded as if i took them. he is threatening all sorts of outlandish legal action against everyone, i removed tthe corresponding images off commons too.

2615:

Hi. I see you have deleted the majority of the articles of the contestants. I was wondering why you deleted them since there was clearly no conclusion reached to whether the articles should be deleted or not on one of the talk pages:

946:

You made a personal attack on me- you don't seem to understand that when you attack people and act in an uncivil manner, they are going to complain. It appears to me that I am notyour first victim. I suggest you look at your conduct.

2262:

It was only a few days later that I, also as a part of my admin role came across the speedy delete request and confronted with the above rationale, agreed with Evilclown93 views and removed the request stating in my edit notice:

2520:

Glad you saw the humor in it. After a while, you'll want to repost it, (even if only for the Talladega Nights quote in it.) In fact, if you leave it, you can refer to it whenever someone else gets into a disagreement with you.

4846:

I'm aware that that page isn't suitable for asking questions, but I felt it was an effort by PalestineRemembered to do precisely that and only posted there to clarify what he was trying to do. Did you intend to respond to him?

4594:

comes into it as well). Basically, with your new shiny mop do you think this meets criteria or should we advise the editor to drop it? (probably) If you levave a comment in their sandbox it would be handy. Thanks for any help.

4070:. It is possible that he or she has seeral more sockpuppets. As you can see his only goal is disruption. Despite this category being deleted two times he creates it again. It is time this user and his sockpuppets be stopped. -- 2380:

I believe your intentions are good, but I am now spending my time talking to you and not doing other things. (Granted, I'm sure you're a pleasure to speak with, but my page is gone and I'm talking to you instead of sleeping.

232:

YEah... I looked through his new articles in his last 500 edits and most are clean at a glance. But some started out as copyvios, and were mostly rewritten... others he seems to start with a source and change some words, e.g.

2967:

Bugger....I can try and find a blank copy of the picture, but then I would have to find the author of the picture. I am out of ideas. I was honestly trying to get that picture in "legally" (by Wiki standards). Oh well. -

2092:

hell. "Connecticut" was what came to mind. Carpetbombing the entire Northeastern U.S. would be another option. I find people can get my goat too easily (something to work on) but at least I calm down within about 12 hours.

4250:

I was confused at first about your speedy request on this one, but I understand it now. I'd take care of it but it's a bit complex and I don't want to butcher it. I've left it for somebody with more experience. Cheers!

1670:(including the related talk page and talk page archive) and other places. If you have a particular source that supports your interpretation of policy, I would appreciate it if you would specifically point it out to me. 2619:. You didn't even provide a final argument/reason for deleting the article on the discussion page or in the summary box. I just want to request to please restore the articles until a final verdict is reached. Thank You - 378:. I was really waffly on that article--kind of a collection of trivia, but as a member of the Ohio State Legislature and a publisher he meets notability criteria, so I opted to create. Thanks for contacting me about it! 4808:

You have deleted my work. The source for this work is reliable but I have cut 'n pasted without, as I intended, editing down the article, as I was interrupted. I believe that I have failed to add the references/ tag.

3885:

was marked as spam; it did not appear to be spam so I removed and placed with a notability tag. Then looking at the history page I got concerned on what the appropriate thing to do is . . . can you take a look at it?

1218:

How ignorant are you? I have withdrawn the article you complained about, made inquiries with the person whose copyright you have alleged I have infringed and confirmed that they do not consider there is any breach of

3105:. I asked for a second opinion about this from someone, but got no response. My sentiment would actually be to delete (almost) all the images he uploaded. Except the ones where he really stated he made them himself. 562: 1464:

another interesting case where a majority was overturned. I voted neither for nor against, and I'm not interested in commenting on it (and I've always got some sympathy in these cases) but just passing on the news.

3166:

Thankyou very much for the forum link. Even though I honestly do check the copyright status of all images I post on this website I simply don’t know which tag to use. Once again thanks for the link - it will help.

3664:

Hello again. I've just noticed that a large number of images that Mattythewhite uploaded, including ones that he claims he took himself, were in fact taken from the *.rivals.net network of websites. For example,

148:

Hey. I was a bit reluctant to ask this at first since you're still a little new in a way, but after seeing your edits around I think you would be great admin material. If you wish, I'd gladly nominate you over at

2639:

Allright. Thanks for all the help. It's really a relief to at least be able to continue working on the articles while they are in my subpages. Thanks again for your efforts and I wish you a merry week ahead. -

4179:). I've tried to find where this statue (or the photo, as it's copyright might have expired anyway) came from but no luck so far. In the mean time however, I think it's probably better to delete it. Cheers. -- 589:

Thank you for taking time to explain your position. From your answer, however, I believe that my own explanation was not clear, so I will try to do better, one step at a time. I apologize in advance for the

2019:

supported you. Now that that's over with, would you please block all users from Connecticut except me? No need to rush: If you could do it by 6 p.m. Eastern time that would be more than sufficient. Thanks!

4812:

Please could you restore the article, so that I may edit the text and add more (non-copyright) material. The message that the bot sent did not imply deletion, just a placement of a tag on the article.===

846:

You sure have an itchy triger finger, I know the rules. Sometimes when I create an article I save it a couple times instead of hitting preview. IF you don't remove the speedy deletion I won't change it.

2172:

I echo my comrades, and congratulations on your promotion, which was well deserved! I followed you this morning, and would be honored to work with you - hollar if you need a second voice on something!

2597:

after all. Then I really looked at the history and saw the article had been up for deletion, etc., etc. Too bad no one has added a word to the Hikari Hayashibara since. Anyway, thanks for the save. -

2339:

I should end by also indicating that my becoming unavailable at the time I did had everything to do with it being 2.00am in the morning at my location (bed and pillow beckoned) and no other reasoning.

667:

Therefore, even the essay does not say that the arguments should be disregarded. The goal of the essay is to steer people in the direction of making more useful comments in discussions about articles.

2979:

I know, fair-use and I have always "butted heads", but I think I can find a picture of my cat with the same look and can use that. Thanks for your help though, I greatly appericate it. Take care...

2528:

So unless this gets resolved soon, I'm going to repost MY resume on MY page. Please don't mess with my USERPAGE (unless, of course, you're going to give me a cool award). 17:51, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

3985:. All of which have been granted rights to upload by the author exclusively as mentioned in the description, including the authors name. I am wondering if your bot is not recognizing the syntax? 3775:. Do you think that is necessary? No other articles (with the exception of a few talk pages...your's now included) link to it. Isn't it better to get rid of it all together? It serves no purpose. 1425:. Consensus in a deletion debate could keep such an article. (I think it might be possible to argue against this by quoting other Knowledge guidelines, policies, etc., but the one I'm relying on, 2585:

today and linked to some of her drawings. I misread the caption as Kiki and thought the IP was right (it was momo, curved line instead of straight--I've been away too long). Then I followed the

726:

notable, he is entitled, in his infinite wisdom, to decide that the community is wrong and that he has a better understanding of what is "encyclopedic" than those of us who labor without the mop.

2299:

request. Please do not continue to suggest speedy deletion in this method - no matter what editor is frustrating you with their additions as it belittles your otherwise good work. Keep editing!

2295:

I came across it a day later and after I had left an adjusted canned message (which as most of you know includes a welcome to wikipedia line) on DreamGuy's talk page that also said, politely,

1667: 1383:

No, I'm confused. Perhaps we're just stating the same thing differently, but I think my way of stating it is clearer. I think it helps to simply consider WP:N and WP:V separately. You said:

4429:

this is getty editorial image #73491119, taken by Jeff Vinnick. I thought providing that information would get it deleted as fast as possible. Do I have to db tag it to get it deleted? --

2827:

That was good. I thought you said you only knew a little about archaeology. That was a serious name drop. He's in EVERY archaeological bit about Egypt. Methinks it's in his contract.

2097: 981:; it really doesn't help anything and in this case led to the deletion of the article. Now I'm having to track down the text before it was deleted so I can re-create it as it used to be. 2803:

I'm also going to write to Critical Thinker and Thesultan and tell them that enough is enough. They both know who I am, and I am putting my identity right yout there, so I'm a target.

1442:

If by "notability" we're only referring to the Knowledge guideline, then the question isn't so much what people think about the sourcing as what the guideline thinks about the sourcing.

2223:

for taking an interest in this matter. I appreciate the views you have provided and understand them all to be in good faith. I detail the following comments for historical purposes:

3146:

Just read your message. Hope it helps. I also guess I was a little bit too harsh in my original post to him, I must have been dealing with a lot of copyright violations that day. :(

3636:

Hi. I really like your signature, however it is at the limit for signature length. Currently it is 'legal' however please do not make it any longer. For futher reading please read:

1106:

is weird enough that it's probably not possible to write a decent article about him. In any case, I wish you well and it looks to me like you'll be given the mop in a few days.

2932:

is on, it states the same thing. I have contacted the website, but until then, I do believe the picture should be brought back, on good faith, under the "not sure" template. -

4778:

Sorry to break you fun, but the trial run is over. :-) I take it you agreed with the tagging CSB did? (Except that unfortunate but unavoidable PD source copy, of course) —

4221: 4694:

the constructive advice that I received, into my future actions on Knowledge. If you can think of any other ways that I can further improve, please let me know. Best wishes,

733:

I have no doubt that some, perhaps even many, people agree with you. That doesn't make it right. But if the community believes that an administrator should be free to delete

4007:

I just looked at all the pics I uploaded by the same author/donator. It might be faster if I just replaced it with similar pics from flickr or wikimedia commons tomorrow.

2689:

Hi. I see you undid one of my speedies and "userfied" the page. I'd just like to point out that you've not actually userfied the page, because it's still in mainspace, at

206: 3073:

then? An apparent PR writer made it, protested it, and after making some uncivil comments wants it deleted along with his account saying his reputation is on the line. -

3026:

use of the media elements. It has no recognizable tie-in with any product or service or trademarks. It does not create obscene or scandalous works. None of these apply.

169:

Alright then, I'll start it up and ask wmarsh if he still wishes to be a co-nom. If so he'll send you the link to continue, if not I will. We should be done by tomorrow.

3004:

I've sent an email to the OTRS address you provided. It is entitled "Fw: Todd Marshall dinosaur images" and a list of images it applies to is at the bottom. Thank you!

1710:

Wow, you're an aspie? I had no clue! (I just saw your userbox.) Thanks for all your recent work with images, and congrats on your shiny new admin-flag. All the best, –

1358: 929: 615: 544:

a body of work on the military history of the Republic of Texas. Again, since you saw the one article at the onset, I would appreciate your review of it now. Thanks!

855:

protect only creative work, not the simple recitation of facts. The fact that a single declarative sentence is repeated does not violate copyright. Best wishes,

421:

Hi! The author has replied to my email and commented as an IP on the article talk page. Do you think this is sufficient to deal with the potential copyright issue?

2311:- at which I note Dream Guy has commented, he still reverted Butseriouslyfolks' removal of the speedy tag, even after Butseriouslyfolks wrote in his edit summary, 3206:

Can you actually give evidence they were taken by other people? The York City related ones were mine. From what I can see, there was no proof for their deletion.

3033:

To satisy them, I will include a blurb with the image: "Contains clipart from Microsoft Powerpoint- not for commercial use or resale, per Microsoft guidelines at

2889: 1080: 1551: 1520: 1461: 722:." In other words, you believe that an administrator can look at an article and decide that even though the consensus of the community is that the subject 2089: 490:

I noticed you updated your signature recently, to something very bold. In case you hadn't seen them already, I just wanted to point out these discussions:

318:

Probably. Quickimgdelete.js was changed today and yesterday to account for the change in PUI. Please force reload to bypass your browser's cache. Thanks.

4857:

Ok, I misread that as you were responding to me. :P I'm a bit shellshocked right now. (I should know better than to go to such hotbeds of... politics!)

4768:

Hm. Not yet— until it has approved bot status, I don't want to mess with another bot's output in case it breaks and goes berzerk or something. :-) —

1451:

I agree with you that consensus can't save no-source articles (and this is something of an evolution of my thinking, bringing it a bit closer to yours).

2757:

Seems like you thought of all the right things. I'm not sure that I'd recognize Oobi walking down the street. Now, Big Bird, on the other hand.... :-)

4687: 1339:

I appreciated your response to my questions at the nomination page and it's helped me to think about the issue. As a direct result, I've posted a new

1330: 566: 514:

resemblance... But I do find it most distracting when trying to scan down a page. Anyway, just thought I'd mention, whilst it was still new and fresh.

4451:

needs to be followed (even if I've crossed the line myself), but there is a fine line between policing that and censoring valid opinions from users.

2231:

People will have different views on edit-warring. That was absolutely neither my intention nor, in my view a reflection of my actions in regards to

2265:

reverted edits by DreamGuy to that of Evilclown93 - who is not a "sock" but an admin. Pls use only correct speedy tags before replacing (if at all)

4324: 4297: 4266: 4152: 3832: 2697:. As such I could technically delete it as a recreation of deleted content, but I think I can give you some time to sort this out, if you like. -- 1626: 1293: 1010: 2422:

seriously, when should i expect a response from an admin. and then, what's to keep another one of you wikicops from doing this all over again?

2415:- I am Bob Cargill. I authored both pages. I give permission to myself (and to you) to display the www.bobcargill.com material on Knowledge. - 400:

Support your idea wholeheartedly, so I will email and if there is no reply in, say, 72 hours, I would have no problem supporting speedy deletion.

2485:

look, email me - bob@bobcargill.com or bobcargill@mac.com. please do. because you're making a hell of a lot of work for me, and it's not fun.

2072:

Oh god, I can't believe I missed your application. You'd have my vote, obviously. Anyway, welcome aboard and go delete copyvios, slacker! ;) --

222:? You don't have to help and I hate drive-by work requests on my talk page as much as anybody, but this is your area of expertise and all :-) -- 2928:, it says "This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License" and on the bottom of the page the 2088:

Actually, I'm pretty sure I wrote that note before I went through the Fairfield County article hell. I believe at the time I was going through

1159:

Kindly refrain from this type of ativity in the future- it is apparent that this is not the first time you have engaged in this type of thing.

4114: 3444: 3437: 2392:

As for notability, 'strongly discourage' does not equal copyright violation. You listed that as another reason, which is totally off topic.

2039:. I've added more complete fair use rationale to the image page. And congratulations on becoming an admin, I think you'll do a great job. -- 569:

has mildly chastised me for opposing your RfA without first discussing my concerns on your talk page. You can see my discussion with him on

81: 76: 71: 59: 4516: 4486: 4462: 1686:

To quote a soon-to-be-admin, "my brain hurts". Now I have to do all the real work I should have been doing. Good luck with the tools. --

1077: 1067: 1057: 499: 495: 491: 2540:

I can now confirm that the user is in a position to use the content of the website in question. Thanks for helping resolve this issue.

2096:

Right now I'm causing trouble with one of my overlong (but not, I think, overheated) crusades, this one on overturning the deletion of

130:

Fair enough. I found it with a speedy deletion tag which it didn't merit, so I tried to improve it rather than just deleting it. The

4571: 4021:

You are so disrespectful to Noelle. Wait until you want to buy her brand of ice cream. She won't let you. It's only for the chosen. -

1905: 2712:

It's okay, don't worry about it. The subpage feature is turned off in mainspace, so those were just articles with weird names. :-) --

1343:

at the bottom of the deletion-review discussion. I think the article as I've redone it meets your objections, and it certainly meets

97:

Yeah it appears to be a direct translation of your PDF, I deleted it as such. Thanks for spotting it! (my German is soooo old...) --

2874:

If you don't mind, please kill it. If they're gonna kill it anyways, all the more so to do it now, before I get attacked. Thnax.

1936: 1704: 1060: 3940:

Oh right, I presumed it must have been some sort of a block.. But I've set up an account at Wikimedia and I've uploaded the image

442:

Forwarding is complete. Thank-you for all your attention and for educating me on the process for dealing with this sort of issue!

4426: 2056: 1777:

Congratulations, your nomation was successful and you are now a sysop! (I can't believe someone beat me to congratulating you) --

277: 257:

You had posted an inquiry on the main PUI page, note that PUI has reorganize to use per day pages. I'll move the one you posted.

197: 1050:

You familiar with pipe organs? And where do you think you'd stick a Tuba Magna? Actually, on second thoughts, better not! ;-) --

714:(6) - You adhere to your position that the closer acted appropriately. You said in your response to me that "any assertion that 4244: 3059:

If an article is put up for AfD and later the creator wants the article deleted, can it be blanked and tagged {{db-blanked}}? -

2780: 2015:(even better than civil) and you've helped me to refine my thinking more than once. And then I noticed I was too late. Well, I 372: 336: 4201:

Why did you deny that speedy? It's not the actual Cover art it's a fan creation from the Web and isn't allowed on Knowledge.--

3650: 2657:

Thanks for cleaning up the missing-source tag on that image. I made a complete mess of that (I misunderstood the CSD text).

950:

You were the protaganist. If you want to act aggressively and rudely, thnen you should expect to make other people unhasppy.

453: 432: 411: 389: 3930:. I've made a cropped version of the image and don't worry, it seems to be a totally legitimate image for upload. Thanks, 3454:

2. The largest group of it's type in America (so they claim), created from the merger of two older eating disorder groups.

2608: 2343:

Again thank you all for your comments. Please let me know if anything at all needs further explaining. With best wishes --

2275:

You will note that I was talking about the content of the speedy deletion tag request of which I considered words such as

2154: 1650: 1603: 4710: 4175:

require creative input to photograph. And a three-dimensional work of art is what this is (different angle, same statue

3134:

Link gone by now. I deleted most of his images except the ones tagged as fair use or images stated (s)he made them self.

4701: 1997: 1916: 1595:

I have struck your second/double support !vote at R's RFA. You are not permitted to !vote more than once. Apologies. --

2852:

And why is this poo happening? How does someone fight this? And why is wiki such a hassle? 03:06, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

47: 17: 3789:

I am recreating the article that you just deleted. However, I am not copying from the website word for word. Cheers.

2694: 3689: 3325: 38: 4535:

new smaller version was uploaded. I have direct authority for adding the image, and it now belongs to Knowledge.

4716:

For some reason I thought it would be humorous to actually make the page. The title probably needs work though. -

3365: 2912:

I found the "author" of the image, but before I could add it, it was deleted. So, now what template do I add? -

2743:

I considered untagging it, there's a kids show with hands with those eyeballs as its characters, and it's called

2562:

Good ness. Just promise me you won't hassle me as I try to sing the praises of Knowledge to the academic world.

1724:

That's wonderful news, friend. I will hopefully begin seeing your wonderful work around wikipedia :-) Take care.

503: 4881: 3317: 1483:

fact tag to it. My referring to your arguments only meant you had prompted me to clarify my own by referring to

4512: 4482: 4458: 4171: 4110: 3717: 3457:

3. It was wikified (lots of links) and clearly had a stub tag so that people would know it was a little sparse.

3022:

does not violate any Microsoft rules regarding use of Powerpoint clipart. The Microsoft rules are shown below.

2690: 2148: 1644: 1597: 1071: 1051: 219: 3733: 3697: 3424: 1800:

Yay, congrats. You not only passed RfA, you broke the record for most support votes by one of my nominations.

620:

Administrators necessarily must use their best judgment ... to determine when rough consensus has been reached

91: 3725: 3670: 3666: 3216: 2439:

Now what happens? Do you unblank the page or does an admin post something telling you not to blank anymore?

2302:

My warning therefore was in relation to his edit-warring with three admins who did not agree with his method.

3709: 3701: 3685: 3313: 2772: 4377:

Don't quite follow on the Kurt Hellmer delete. I looked up a few of the WP entries for people cited in the

3693: 1227:

All of these facts are lost on you. Why? Theonly logical explanatin is utter ignorance and pigheadedness.

4106: 3530: 2349: 2285: 2212: 2122:

Congratulations on your successful RfA. Here's your mop and bucket. Use them wisely. :-) Festive regards,

1901: 1826: 1525:

I shall continue to work on behalf of the community's interests and improve according to your suggestions.

1204: 535: 3329: 3301: 2471: 2259:

Dream Guy's reply (unknown to me at the time) was to suggest that Evilclown93 was a sock of the uploader.

1152:

I object to your unreasonable and unfounded deletion of material fromn the article which I have created.

4858: 4848: 4650: 4590:. The image I have discussed on the users talk page, (uploaded pd-self which is not the case - possible 4345: 3882: 3875: 3600: 3596: 3443:

I've been using Knowledge for over two years and I feel from my experience that your speedy deletion of

3341: 3333: 3309: 3297: 2676: 2204: 2129: 2076: 1565: 1534: 101: 4419: 3982: 3978: 3768: 3761: 3369: 3337: 3305: 3289: 3285: 2533: 2174: 2036: 1831: 1266:

For the record, the article was reinstated after the allegation of infringement of copyright was made.

545: 243: 223: 4364: 4225: 4202: 3927: 3737: 3729: 3721: 3713: 3705: 3678: 3674: 3423:

You're welcome. There may still be some outstanding problems; a number of images have been taken from

3349: 3321: 3293: 3277: 2875: 2861: 2831: 2814: 2507: 2492: 2468: 2443: 2423: 2399: 2367: 2249: 2220: 928:

There's also a TfD for the tag we were using, and I was wondering if you could comment there as well:

738:

are better than all the other users. But don't just ignore the policy or use an essay to trump policy.

511: 4447:(the bit you removed), you are deluded. This amounts to nothing less than censorship. I agree that 4102: 3974: 3646: 3281: 2641: 2631: 2620: 2232: 2052: 1792: 1605: 481: 4673: 3070: 131: 4508: 4478: 4454: 4318: 4291: 4260: 4146: 3926:

I see I've been blocked from uploading images, but there is one image I would like to upload. From

3826: 3353: 3042: 3034: 2758: 2748: 2208: 2200: 1620: 1556:

Continuarei a trabalhar em prol dos interesses da comunidade e a melhorar segundo vossas sugestões.

1287: 1142: 1092: 1074: 1054: 1004: 787:

But if you read the very next section following the section you linked to, it says the following:

540: 201: 4578:

and all that, to see if there is a case for the article within the 'pedia. I personally feel it's

3447:

was totally unjustified. I realize that most of the article content came from the site but it is:

3345: 2541: 4873: 4832: 4817: 4717: 3945: 3931: 3391: 3382: 3373: 3357: 3269: 3260: 3250: 3241: 3228: 3207: 3197: 3150: 3138: 3126: 3109: 2575: 2321: 2216: 1940: 1923: 1840: 1269: 1258: 1233: 1191: 1180: 1162: 964: 956: 574: 350: 329: 1642:

Hey - no worries. Memory must have momentarily stalled there. Happens to the best of people. --

1311:

Thanks for creating those stubs and adding the material into various articles. This is a worthy

4861: 4851: 4835: 4820: 4795: 4782: 4772: 4758: 4743: 4720: 4704: 4681: 4653: 4636: 4611: 4565: 4539: 4522: 4492: 4468: 4433: 4413: 4389: 4367: 4348: 4331: 4304: 4273: 4238: 4215: 4183: 4159: 4126: 4087: 4074: 4067: 4044: 4025: 4011: 4001: 3989: 3963: 3948: 3934: 3916: 3900: 3890: 3866: 3839: 3811: 3779: 3755: 3654: 3625: 3613: 3578: 3490: 3431: 3394: 3385: 3376: 3360: 3272: 3263: 3253: 3244: 3231: 3210: 3200: 3186: 3171: 3153: 3141: 3129: 3112: 3086: 3077: 3063: 3008: 2985: 2974: 2962: 2950: 2938: 2918: 2896: 2878: 2864: 2834: 2817: 2787: 2761: 2751: 2721: 2706: 2679: 2664: 2644: 2634: 2623: 2601: 2581:

Thanks for your help with my mistaken template. An IP making a first edit changed her name to

2544: 2510: 2495: 2446: 2436:

Thanx for your help. I posted the copyright. I even put an email if there are any questions.

2426: 2402: 2370: 2177: 2167: 2156: 2140: 2104: 2078: 2062: 2024: 2007: 1984: 1971: 1952: 1943: 1926: 1910: 1889: 1866: 1843: 1834: 1819: 1810: 1795: 1786: 1769: 1749: 1735: 1714: 1692: 1680: 1652: 1633: 1576: 1545: 1491: 1469: 1374: 1351: 1323: 1300: 1272: 1261: 1236: 1207: 1194: 1183: 1165: 1124: 1095: 1035: 1026: 1017: 985: 967: 959: 936: 913: 876: 859: 831: 774: 750: 583: 548: 522: 458: 437: 416: 394: 356: 313: 294: 271: 246: 226: 179: 163: 138: 119: 103: 4736: 4410: 4386: 4312: 4285: 4254: 4140: 3959:

Yes, it looks like Wherebot is not working properly; lots of false positives with no link. --

3897: 3887: 3820: 3620: 3608: 3604: 3083: 3074: 3060: 2980: 2969: 2957: 2945: 2933: 2913: 2717: 2702: 2661: 2344: 2329:

is not the most polite individual on wikipedia, but he damned sure isn't the most acrid either

2162: 2114: 1958: 1897: 1782: 1733: 1614: 1281: 1032: 998: 982: 765: 641: 307: 288: 265: 3221: 4698: 4672:

I have found another post that might allow me to put his photos on Knowledge. Please go to

4400: 4063: 3019: 2134: 2002: 1690: 1678: 1570: 1539: 978: 829: 772: 748: 581: 570: 449: 428: 407: 385: 234: 4051: 2903: 4629: 4604: 4558: 4502: 4448: 3642: 3557: 3101:

Yes, that's a problem case. Since I tagged those images myself I didn't processed them on

2893: 2784: 2040: 1882: 1862:

Heh; you're welcome for the support! You're welcome for the {{administrator}} tag too! :)

1320: 1107: 644:

discusses arguments which "should generally be avoided." However, that essay also states:

365: 3249:

Correct, EOS D30 is used for some. Is it possible for deleted images to be re-generated?

2630:

significane for most, if not all of them. Thanks for your support Butseriouslyfolks =D -

2278:

the guy who keeps uploading it needs to get blocked so he knows not to pull this crap....

2571:

by the way, I left the COI tag there, as a badge of honor ;-) 18:43, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

240: 4378: 4180: 3183: 1981: 1863: 1816: 1801: 1746: 1426: 933: 681: 656:

summarily dismiss that argument just because WP:INTERESTING is a section in this essay.

191: 170: 154: 4574:. Brief history. Article has been speedied six times. I have worked with this editor, 4059: 4055: 3082:

Thanks, I too was thinking the whole thing was starting to get just plain pointless. -

2281:

to be misplaced, no matter the frustration felt by Dream Guy. I then left the matter.

4878: 4828: 4813: 4740: 4678: 4591: 4575: 4134: 4122:

I am not a sockpuppet or a sockpuppet holder. No.13 is committing slander about me. (

4080: 4022: 4008: 3998: 3986: 3776: 3752: 3748: 3575: 3487: 3428: 3236:

First of all, I think only the ones you have suspicions about should be deleted. And

3147: 3135: 3123: 3119: 3106: 3102: 2316: 2308: 2289: 2196: 2188: 2073: 1920: 1762: 602: 519: 342: 321: 150: 116: 98: 2284:

DreamGuy it appears renewed his request again and without alteration at which point

1510: 1188:

I note for the record that you have not given any response to my previous message.

204:

to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at

3913: 3847: 3792: 3005: 2713: 2698: 2658: 2482:

to kill my user page. and why? because you are a wiki-cop and you have awards?

2242:

many times do we have to delete this thing, he's just stubbornly refusing to listen

2101: 2021: 1778: 1725: 1711: 1488: 1466: 1371: 1348: 1031:

Sorry for the confusion; I must have been in a hurry and I mis-read SGGH's posting.

851:

It is very difficult to suggest that this page constitutes a copyright violation.

685: 302: 283: 260: 4404:

significant. As for Dürrenmatt, I could provide a link to a play of Dürrenmatt’s,

2459:

I jumped through your flippin hoops on my page, but don't mess with my USER PAGE!

797:

debated and deliberated". To me, that clearly reinforces that consensus controls.

4549:

Hello BSF - are you online to give me a quick thirdy party opinion on something?

2929: 2800:

Thanx for the help. That actually makes much more sense. That's a good edit.

1429:, seems to be the best, most direct source. You might say it's only implied that 977:

Please stop copying text from websites and adding it to articles as you did with

4755: 4695: 4587: 4583: 4430: 4396: 4382: 2807: 2598: 2124: 1992: 1687: 1675: 1560: 1529: 1484: 1430: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1366: 1362: 1344: 1316: 1066:

Who built it? How many speaking stops does it have? You may be interested to se

895:

deletion at DRV if the applicability of one of the criteria comes under dispute.

826: 769: 760: 745: 715: 693: 689: 677: 578: 445: 424: 403: 381: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4792: 4779: 4769: 4623: 4598: 4552: 4536: 4123: 4092: 4084: 4071: 4041: 3960: 3523: 3168: 3095: 2412:

wonderful. thanx. i sent the following email to: permissions-en@wikimedia.org

1949: 1876: 930:

Knowledge:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 July 7#Template:Unreferenced episode

910: 873: 856: 852: 184:

He declined to co-nom, but you have his vote at least. Here's the link for it.

4475:

project in general - I'm increasingly feeling like I'm stuck in North Korea.

4176: 1091:

Wow, I'm so happy. Now what do I do with it? I've never had one before. :)

1022:

Yeah I noticed that, I assume weatherman simply wants to recreate the thing.

627:

No one has claimed that any of the comments by either side were in bad faith.

4739:. Is there a way to put photos that are used in one language into another? 4409:

figures. I'll accede to your more experienced judgement here. Any thoughts?

4405: 4095:

is Deleting pictures and links on wikipedia which is against the rules. eg:

2273:

Speedy deletion tag removed - awaiting a NPOV request that retains civility!

1023: 2327:

I note the comments above that in the opinion of an other editor Dream Guy

3941: 3548: 2554:

May I please put it back? Or will you do that? 18:43, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

4096: 3772: 510:. (Obviously, I'm not a fan of them ;) Though I must admit I do like the 135: 3477:

can have a chance to agree/disagree with your totally arbitrary action.

2320:

consider that amount of time excessive I thank you, and particularly to

1754: 640:, neither a policy nor a guideline, which includes among many sections, 601:

requires that an article be kept unless there is a consensus to delete (

4279: 3237: 2735:(i STILL think you should leave my award...) 09:18, 16 July 2007 (UTC) 2590: 1703: 759:

I read your reply and I want to be clear that I am not suggesting that

3673:, which Mattythewhite claims he took upthread, are in fact taken from 3268:

Aahh.. so complicated! Shall leave for another time with those ones..

825:

faced with consensus that runs contrary to your personal opinion. --

3973:

I think you are tagging a number of images I have uploaded. Such as

1581:

Thanks • Obrigado • Gracias • Merci • Danke • Спасибо • Tack • Kiitos

1433:

doesn't trump consensus, but I think the implication is very strong.)

563:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Father Michael Goetz Secondary School

4381:

entry, and the entry for Hellmer seems comparable to something like

2925: 1399: 618:

instructs admins on how to implement the policy. It says, in part:

4501:. Your message showed just how ignorant you are of my issues with 3503:"Feel free to recreate the article from scratch" -Butseriouslyfolks 2288:

removed it, it was renewed and then Butseriouslyfolks put it up at

3681:. Some more randomly selected examples to illustrate the problem: 2465:

GET A LIFE. Go study for your wikipediaholic exam or something!!

2113: 1753: 242:. Very difficult cleanup job here. I'll copy this over to AN/I. -- 4674:

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=474942&page=18

3640:. Thanks for your help in this matter. And well done on your RfA 1745:

Congratulations on becoming an admin, Butseriouslyfolks! Cheers!

3043:

http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/powerpoint/HP030900871033.aspx

3035:

http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/powerpoint/HP030900871033.aspx

2744: 2617: 1365:? My position is that well-sourced articles, which may not meet 1359:

Knowledge:Deletion guidelines for administrators#Rough Consensus

4363:

would you send me your email address? mine is on my user page.

2191:

my response to those who have commented on this user's blocking

1554:, que terminou sem sucesso com um resultado final de (80/22/3). 692:

in your response to me, but that argument is, in my opinion, a

4344:

Thanks. I think I've got the double redirects fixed as well. —

4193:

Do you like follow me? The Rypcord. 02:31, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

3637: 1068:

Church of St. Mary the Virgin, Ewell#The "Father Willis" organ

25: 3390:

Mustn'e have been mine then. Wasn't too sure about that one.

1523:, which ended unsuccessfully with a final tally of (80/22/3). 1230:

Kindly withdraw the allegation of infringement of copyright.

1172:

mirror before you make such accusations against other people.

4732: 3469:

in America is notable in and of itself, and that you should

3427:. Unfortunately the site doesn't credit the photographer. -- 2385:

it's course, you got delete happy and nuked me. Seriously.

2315:. Finding another reversion, despite an ongoing request at 1702: 1509: 3356:. Can't really remember by only looking at the file name.. 3020:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Image_talk:Vvcnvalogistics3full.jpg

1583:

Esker • Köszönöm • Takk • Grazie • Hvala • ありがとう • 謝謝 • 谢谢

371:

Hey there! This article actually came from the backlog of

3619:

Okie Dokie, Thanks:) Take Care and Have a Good Weekend...

3607:? I would appericate any help you can give. Take Care... 3196:

Could you explain why you have deleted my images? Thanks.

2888:

There are currently 3 Different lists of Iraq Operations;

2462:

You didn't delete it last night, you did so this morning.

4663:

Butseriouslyfolks, You put this message on my talk page:

4659:

Pictures by Imre Solt regarding copyrights and Knowledge

3514:

You may want to consider adding these to your user page.

953:

As I have said, don't dish it out if you can't take it.

4498: 4444: 2253: 2236: 1340: 1312: 1201: 992: 842:

North Dakota Association of Rural Electric Cooperatives

507: 376: 237: 2098:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Plot of Les Misérables

1148:

Beale Piano- unreasonable deletion of factual material

720:

could not have been accurate, however well-intentioned

335:

22:58, 5 July 2007 (UTC) P.S., you would probably add

194:

would like to nominate you to become an administrator.

2307:

In relation to blocking ... Following the posting at

3215:

Yes that one, I admit. But not all of them. Such as

2195:(Posted also on individual talk pages) Thank you to 539:

I noted on that page. Also, have you looked at the

339:

to your watchlist so you can see when I do updates.

4280:

This is why I wanted to leave it for somebody else.

2732:Methinks I'll leave it just like that. thanx. -bc 2161:Congratulations on your recent promotion. Regards, 1980:Congratulations, be thoughtful and you'll be fine! 1519:Thank you, Butseriouslyfolks, for participating in 4735:. I am trying to put them onto the English site: 2558:Thanx for the COI tag btw. That was sweet of you. 1413:Notability requires multiple independent sources. 207:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Butseriouslyfolks 1550:Obrigado, Butseriouslyfolks, por participares no 4133:OK, please take this dispute elsewhere, such as 1315:. Do you think you could add the information at 616:Knowledge:Deletion_guidelines_for_administrators 280:is updated, and should be followed if possible. 2890:Iraqi coalition counter-insurgency operations 2565:(I still think you should post the award...) 1839:Yea, congrats. You will do well as an admin! 1357:Well, now I'm confused. Do you disagree that 1255:If you can't take it then don't dish it out! 1070:. My mother is Director of Music there atm.-- 278:Knowledge:Possibly unfree images#Instructions 8: 4079:Ok, I followed your advice and posted it on 3817:Thanks for the warning and happy editing! -- 4791:It's baa-ack! (For a 2-day trial) :-) — 3603:account transfered to my current username, 2090:List of people from Ridgefield, Connecticut 200:to see what this process entails, and then 2653:Tags on Image:April two and a half men.jpg 1759:Congradulations on becoming an admin! -- 4688:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Elonka 2 3747:for all these images and listing them at 3742:... and so on. You can google search for 3220: 2902: 1400:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Noroton 1331:Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2007 July 5 2747:. Don't know if that changes your mind. 2432:I posted the copyright on Robert Cargill 625:question and the voting on that article. 4733:http://ml.wikipedia.org/സാലിക്_(ചുങ്കം) 2848:Well THAT didn't last long. Now what? 134:main article needs to go as well then. 4877:Knowledge without them being deleted? 3944:. Is everything okay with it? Cheers, 2844:much thanx! 03:06, 18 July 2007 (UTC) 2783:. Please let me know asap, thanks! -- 2693:. If it was userfied, it should be at 2456:you deleted my USER PAGE??? STOP IT! 1948:Congratulations. Now take a break! -- 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4282:Maybe the move's not complete yet? -- 3767:Hi. I noticed that after the prod on 3445:National Eating Disorders Association 3438:National Eating Disorders Association 3069:Hmm, would it be okay in the case of 2516:Fair enough. But in the mean time... 2248:I assume as a part of his admin role 1200:Yes I did, about a half hour later. 473:Hi. Just wanted to mention 2 things. 7: 3638:http://en.wikipedia.org/WP:SIGNATURE 3473:put it back and put a VFD tag on so 3037:, Copyright, Microsoft Corporation" 2847: 2589:Wikilink and found it redirected to 1915:Congratulations. Now get to work on 1661:Deleting articles which lack sources 4872:I read through your response about 4711:Knowledge:Copyrights/MikeGodwinSays 4443:I believe that if you believe that 2924:If you scroll to the bottom of the 2235:. DreamGuy placed a tag initially 4726:Photos in Different Language Sites 4572:User talk:Charineeimagebkk/Sandbox 2956:could public domain be claimed? - 2324:for his revision of the time line. 24: 1894:And from me - congratulations :) 4427:Knowledge:Possibly unfree images 4309:Never mind, it's fixed. :-) -- 3547: 3542: 3522: 3518: 3381:Believe so, taken with EOS D30. 2823:And how do you know Zahi Hawass? 1417:doesn't, so an article can meet 1361:indicates that consensus trumps 1307:Thanks for creating those stubs! 993:tagged this article as a copyvio 198:Knowledge:Requests for adminship 153:. Let me know of your decision. 29: 4245:Template:Non-free use rationale 4062:, and couple of anon accounts 3771:expired, you put a redirect to 3558:does not understand mean people 2781:Knowledge:What Knowledge is not 2313:Let's discuss it first, please? 1505: 1133:To my oppose, you hashed out a 373:Knowledge:Articles for creation 337:User:Howcheng/quickimgdelete.js 4867: 3595:I used to edit under the name 2695:User:Bhavesh.Chauhan/Rimi Dhar 1611:Ugh. Sorry, unintentional. -- 1370:do you disagree with in that? 1278:And after it was rewritten. -- 1: 3326:Donaldson penalty tolfrey.jpg 3000:Todd Marshall dinosaur images 2609:Sa Re Ga Ma Pa Challenge 2007 2363:And who are you? Seriously. 2252:removed that tag as detailed 2813:Thanx again for the help. 2376:Understood, but seriously... 1917:Knowledge:Copyright problems 1137:in response and not just an 995:. I didn't add any text. -- 942:Stop making personal attacks 4882:01:35, 11 August 2007 (UTC) 4649:Thanks for helping me out. 3997:. Is that what they mean? 3366:Donaldson stuart bishop.jpg 3227:. Nothing wrong with them. 2035:Thanks for the heads up on 18:User talk:Butseriouslyfolks 4897: 4862:16:36, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 4852:16:19, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 4836:08:42, 7 August 2007 (UTC) 4821:22:11, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 4796:01:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC) 4783:19:18, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 4773:18:42, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 4759:15:25, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 4744:02:44, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 4721:18:38, 5 August 2007 (UTC) 4705:04:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC) 4682:02:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC) 4654:08:45, 3 August 2007 (UTC) 4637:08:43, 3 August 2007 (UTC) 4612:08:27, 3 August 2007 (UTC) 4566:08:22, 3 August 2007 (UTC) 4540:04:59, 3 August 2007 (UTC) 4523:01:48, 1 August 2007 (UTC) 4493:01:33, 1 August 2007 (UTC) 4469:01:27, 1 August 2007 (UTC) 4445:this was a personal attack 4414:03:09, 1 August 2007 (UTC) 4172:Image:Berenice cilicia.JPG 3744:site:rivals.net "keywords" 3718:Image:Darren craddock4.jpg 3318:Clayton donaldson york.jpg 3051:03:57, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 299:Problem with your script? 4434:15:15, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 4390:00:21, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 4368:01:14, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 4349:21:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4332:21:03, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4305:21:02, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4274:20:43, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4239:20:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4216:20:38, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4184:01:10, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4166:Berenice of Cilicia image 4160:05:20, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4135:WP:ANI#Massive_disruption 4127:05:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4088:19:13, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 4075:18:39, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 4045:09:28, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 4026:08:43, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 4012:06:45, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 4002:06:25, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 3990:05:57, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 3964:05:23, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 3949:17:09, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 3935:15:28, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 3917:15:28, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 3901:20:46, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 3896:Gotcha, and no prob. :) - 3891:17:09, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 3867:08:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 3840:08:22, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 3812:08:20, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 3780:05:17, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 3756:15:59, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 3734:Image:Darren_dunning2.jpg 3655:08:18, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 3626:02:40, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 3614:02:09, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 3579:02:32, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 3491:01:46, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 3432:00:03, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 3395:10:17, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 3386:23:33, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 3377:23:30, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 3361:23:13, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 3273:23:05, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 3264:22:59, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 3254:22:16, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 3245:22:04, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 3232:21:51, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 3211:21:46, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 3201:21:43, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 3187:16:13, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 3172:16:07, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 3154:16:07, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 3142:18:57, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 3130:09:35, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 3113:09:08, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 3087:04:59, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 3078:04:42, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 3064:04:26, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 3009:03:57, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 2986:03:26, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 2975:03:09, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 2963:02:50, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 2951:02:40, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 2939:02:22, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 2919:01:21, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 2897:15:36, 18 July 2007 (UTC) 2879:13:34, 18 July 2007 (UTC) 2865:06:21, 18 July 2007 (UTC) 2835:03:06, 18 July 2007 (UTC) 2818:03:01, 18 July 2007 (UTC) 2788:21:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 2762:15:54, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 2752:07:37, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 2722:09:18, 16 July 2007 (UTC) 2707:09:00, 16 July 2007 (UTC) 2691:Bhavesh.Chauhan/Rimi Dhar 2680:08:36, 16 July 2007 (UTC) 2665:07:07, 16 July 2007 (UTC) 2645:05:39, 16 July 2007 (UTC) 2635:05:12, 16 July 2007 (UTC) 2624:04:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC) 2602:02:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC) 2545:18:43, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 2511:17:51, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 2501:You should leave my award 2496:17:38, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 2472:17:25, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 2447:08:33, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 2427:07:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 2403:07:33, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 2371:07:00, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 2350:02:04, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 2178:14:13, 14 July 2007 (UTC) 2168:03:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC) 2157:08:14, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 2141:00:39, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 2105:03:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC) 2079:14:15, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 2063:13:17, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 2025:20:08, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 2008:18:32, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 1985:14:17, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 1972:11:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 1953:10:19, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 1944:09:33, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 1927:09:32, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 1911:08:54, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 1890:08:26, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 1867:01:43, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 1844:01:07, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 1835:00:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 1820:23:43, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 1811:23:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 1796:23:36, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 1787:23:28, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 1770:14:42, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 1750:23:27, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 1736:12:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 1715:02:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 1693:05:31, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 1681:05:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 1653:03:33, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 1634:03:32, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 1606:03:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 1577:23:44, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 1546:23:44, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 1492:19:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 1470:19:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 1375:19:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 1352:16:52, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 1324:14:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 1301:15:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 1273:12:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 1208:15:20, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1195:14:26, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1184:07:35, 24 June 2007 (UTC) 1166:06:31, 24 June 2007 (UTC) 1125:04:37, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 3726:Image:Darren barnard.jpg 3671:Image:Anthony_lloyd3.jpg 3667:Image:Anthony lloyd2.jpg 3217:Image:Anthony lloyd2.jpg 2187: 1957:Congratulations, dude. — 1919:, we have a backlog. :) 1668:rejected policy proposal 1558:Calorosos cumprimentos, 1262:09:13, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1237:08:25, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 1096:06:52, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 1087:Thanks for the barnstar! 1081:03:26, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 1061:03:20, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 1036:23:38, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1027:23:23, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1018:23:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 986:21:47, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 968:09:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 960:09:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 937:05:55, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 914:02:17, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 877:19:27, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 860:19:01, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 832:04:45, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 775:02:41, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 751:01:19, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 584:05:40, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 561:An editor involved with 557:Your RFA and my "oppose" 549:12:03, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 523:02:45, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 459:22:48, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 438:09:11, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 417:00:47, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 395:00:42, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 357:22:59, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 314:21:28, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 295:21:20, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 272:21:14, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 247:18:20, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 227:17:33, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 180:22:24, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 164:17:42, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 139:17:25, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 120:22:46, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 104:11:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC) 92:Swiss patent No. 532 261 4497:Please see my comments 3710:Image:Janos_kovacs3.jpg 3702:Image:Andy mcmillan.jpg 3686:Image:Stefan bailey.jpg 2451: 2238:on July 5th that said, 2146:Yep. Good job. :) ---- 1591:Double !vote at R's RFA 1329:Please take another at 4189:Do you like follow me? 3694:Image:Paul wanless.jpg 3425:this copyright website 3372:might have been mine. 3314:Kassam oxford york.jpg 2860:I appreciate it. -bc 2856:Thanx for the support. 2796:That was FAST! Thanx. 2773:NYU in popular culture 2119: 1815:Yes, congratulations! 1773: 1707: 1527:Most sincere regards, 1514: 1336:Hi Butseriouslyfolks, 4868:Imre's Images (again) 4586:although probably is 3601:User:Orangemonster2k1 3597:User:Orangemonster2k1 3451:1. A nonprofit group. 3340:and I think possibly 2233:Image:Daredevil46.jpg 2117: 1935:Congratulations. Now 1757: 1706: 1513: 682:neutral point of view 42:of past discussions. 4833:T A L K . . . to me. 4818:T A L K . . . to me. 4197:Why did you do that? 3223:File:James lloyd.jpg 3018:The image tagged at 3751:will take hours. -- 3660:More image problems 3330:York post match.jpg 3302:Martyn woolford.jpg 2452:OK, now I'm pissed! 2150:Anonymous Dissident 2118:Wield me! Wield me! 1666:discussion in this 1646:Anonymous Dissident 1599:Anonymous Dissident 1590: 565:and the subsequent 541:Council House Fight 518:Thanks again. :) -- 218:Can you please see 4425:As you can see on 4420:Image:MNasland.jpg 3983:Image:HK2000_2.jpg 3979:Image:HK2000_2.jpg 3883:Double the Trouble 3876:Double the Trouble 3561:. Please be nice. 3532:copyright paranoia 3509:spirit of the law. 3342:Kassam stadium.jpg 3334:Anthony lloyd3.jpg 3310:Thornley lloyd.jpg 3298:Craig farrell2.jpg 3014:Powerpoint clipart 2905:File:Cat dude.jpeg 2576:Hikari Hayashibara 2347: 2153: 2139: 2120: 2037:Image:Guy Goma.jpg 1774: 1708: 1649: 1602: 1575: 1544: 1515: 924:Episode review MFD 498:(particularly the 4737:Salik (Road Toll) 4635: 4610: 4570:Could you peruse 4564: 4531:IMC logo orphaned 4519: 4489: 4465: 4222:It's listed here. 4119: 4105:comment added by 3912:of those. Peace. 3769:List of Tag Teams 3762:List of Tag Teams 3605:User:Neutralhomer 3565: 3564: 3539: 3538: 3370:Chris hackett.jpg 3338:Darryn stamp2.jpg 3306:Anthony lloyd.jpg 3290:David mcgurk2.jpg 3286:Craig farrell.jpg 2830:Kisses from Nic. 2720: 2705: 2534:Robert R. Cargill 2355:Robert R. Cargill 2345: 2286:Butseriouslyfolks 2213:Butseriouslyfolks 2147: 2123: 2061: 2060: 2047: 1909: 1888: 1827:Butseriouslyfolks 1785: 1643: 1596: 1588: 1587: 1559: 1528: 1205:Butseriouslyfolks 686:original research 622:. It continues, 536:Butseriouslyfolks 354: 333: 202:contact Wizardman 87: 86: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 4888: 4859:Kyaa the Catlord 4849:Kyaa the Catlord 4651:Charineeimagebkk 4634: 4632: 4621: 4609: 4607: 4596: 4563: 4561: 4550: 4511: 4481: 4457: 4401:Lincoln Steffens 4346:Remember the dot 4329: 4327: 4321: 4315: 4302: 4300: 4294: 4288: 4271: 4269: 4263: 4257: 4236: 4234: 4232: 4213: 4211: 4209: 4157: 4155: 4149: 4143: 4118: 4099: 3975:Image:HK2000.jpg 3864: 3862: 3859: 3856: 3853: 3850: 3837: 3835: 3829: 3823: 3809: 3807: 3804: 3801: 3798: 3795: 3745: 3623: 3611: 3551: 3543: 3529:This user finds 3526: 3519: 3350:Yemi odubade.jpg 3322:Darryn stamp.jpg 3294:Neal bishop2.jpg 3278:David mcgurk.jpg 3240:mostly I think. 3226: 3224: 2983: 2972: 2960: 2948: 2936: 2916: 2908: 2906: 2716: 2701: 2205:Hamster Sandwich 2151: 2137: 2132: 2127: 2053:Talk to the Hand 2050: 2049: 2046: 2041: 2005: 2000: 1995: 1968: 1965: 1908: 1895: 1887: 1885: 1874: 1808: 1781: 1768: 1765: 1731: 1728: 1647: 1631: 1629: 1623: 1617: 1600: 1573: 1568: 1563: 1542: 1537: 1532: 1506: 1398:Retrieved from " 1298: 1296: 1290: 1284: 1122: 1116: 1112: 1015: 1013: 1007: 1001: 991:Note: I simply 979:Orville W. Hagen 973:Orville W. Hagen 486: 480: 457: 436: 415: 393: 355: 348: 345: 334: 327: 324: 310: 305: 291: 286: 268: 263: 235:Icadyptes salasi 177: 161: 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4896: 4895: 4891: 4890: 4889: 4887: 4886: 4885: 4870: 4844: 4806: 4766: 4751: 4728: 4714: 4691: 4661: 4647: 4630: 4622: 4605: 4597: 4559: 4551: 4547: 4533: 4503:User:Abu badali 4441: 4423: 4375: 4361: 4325: 4319: 4313: 4311: 4298: 4292: 4286: 4284: 4267: 4261: 4255: 4253: 4248: 4230: 4228: 4226: 4207: 4205: 4203: 4199: 4191: 4168: 4153: 4147: 4141: 4139: 4107:124.180.215.114 4100: 4033: 4019: 3971: 3957: 3924: 3909: 3879: 3860: 3857: 3854: 3851: 3848: 3846: 3833: 3827: 3821: 3819: 3805: 3802: 3799: 3796: 3793: 3791: 3787: 3765: 3743: 3662: 3634: 3621: 3609: 3593: 3566: 3540: 3441: 3421: 3282:Neal bishop.jpg 3222: 3194: 3179: 3164: 3099: 3057: 3016: 3002: 2981: 2970: 2958: 2946: 2934: 2914: 2910: 2904: 2886: 2884:Iraq Operations 2872: 2858: 2850: 2842: 2825: 2798: 2776: 2741: 2730: 2687: 2672: 2655: 2642:Bhavesh.Chauhan 2632:Bhavesh.Chauhan 2621:Bhavesh.Chauhan 2613: 2579: 2560: 2552: 2538: 2518: 2503: 2479: 2454: 2434: 2410: 2378: 2357: 2193: 2149: 2135: 2130: 2125: 2112: 2086: 2070: 2042: 2033: 2003: 1998: 1993: 1966: 1960: 1896: 1883: 1875: 1802: 1772: 1763: 1760: 1743: 1741:Congratulations 1729: 1726: 1722: 1701: 1663: 1645: 1627: 1621: 1615: 1613: 1598: 1593: 1571: 1566: 1561: 1540: 1535: 1530: 1504: 1334: 1313:series of edits 1309: 1294: 1288: 1282: 1280: 1150: 1118: 1114: 1108: 1103: 1089: 1048: 1011: 1005: 999: 997: 975: 944: 926: 844: 597:(1) - Deletion 567:deletion review 559: 530: 496:wp:sig archive3 492:wp:sig archive1 484: 478: 471: 443: 422: 401: 379: 369: 366:James B. Hughes 343: 340: 322: 319: 312: 308: 303: 293: 289: 284: 270: 266: 261: 255: 216: 211: 171: 155: 146: 128: 95: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4894: 4892: 4869: 4866: 4865: 4864: 4843: 4840: 4839: 4838: 4805: 4804:Bernard Deacon 4802: 4801: 4800: 4799: 4798: 4786: 4785: 4765: 4762: 4750: 4749:Kerry Shook... 4747: 4727: 4724: 4713: 4708: 4690: 4685: 4670: 4669: 4660: 4657: 4646: 4643: 4642: 4641: 4640: 4639: 4582:borderline on 4546: 4543: 4532: 4529: 4528: 4527: 4526: 4525: 4509:PageantUpdater 4479:PageantUpdater 4455:PageantUpdater 4440: 4437: 4422: 4417: 4379:literary agent 4374: 4371: 4360: 4357: 4356: 4355: 4354: 4353: 4352: 4351: 4337: 4336: 4335: 4334: 4247: 4242: 4220: 4198: 4195: 4190: 4187: 4167: 4164: 4163: 4162: 4032: 4029: 4018: 4015: 4005: 4004: 3970: 3967: 3956: 3953: 3952: 3951: 3923: 3920: 3908: 3905: 3904: 3903: 3878: 3873: 3872: 3871: 3870: 3869: 3786: 3783: 3764: 3759: 3740: 3739: 3731: 3723: 3715: 3707: 3699: 3691: 3661: 3658: 3633: 3630: 3629: 3628: 3592: 3589: 3588: 3587: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3563: 3562: 3553: 3541: 3537: 3536: 3527: 3517: 3516: 3515: 3511: 3510: 3505: 3504: 3500: 3499: 3498: 3497: 3496: 3495: 3494: 3493: 3459: 3458: 3455: 3452: 3440: 3435: 3420: 3417: 3416: 3415: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3411: 3410: 3409: 3408: 3407: 3406: 3405: 3404: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3397: 3193: 3190: 3178: 3175: 3163: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3144: 3120:WP:PUI#June_30 3098: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3089: 3071:Rodney burrell 3056: 3053: 3041: 3039: 3015: 3012: 3001: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2989: 2988: 2909: 2900: 2885: 2882: 2871: 2868: 2857: 2854: 2849: 2846: 2841: 2838: 2824: 2821: 2797: 2794: 2792: 2775: 2769: 2767: 2765: 2764: 2759:Carlossuarez46 2749:Carlossuarez46 2740: 2737: 2729: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2686: 2685:"Userfication" 2683: 2671: 2668: 2654: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2612: 2605: 2578: 2573: 2559: 2556: 2551: 2548: 2537: 2530: 2517: 2514: 2502: 2499: 2478: 2477:My point is... 2475: 2453: 2450: 2433: 2430: 2421: 2409: 2406: 2377: 2374: 2356: 2353: 2341: 2340: 2337: 2325: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2293: 2282: 2268: 2260: 2257: 2229: 2201:LessHeard vanU 2192: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2175:old windy bear 2111: 2108: 2085: 2082: 2069: 2066: 2032: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2011: 2010: 1988: 1987: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1946: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1870: 1869: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1832:old windy bear 1758: 1742: 1739: 1721: 1718: 1700: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1662: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1637: 1636: 1592: 1589: 1586: 1585: 1582: 1580: 1579: 1557: 1555: 1549: 1548: 1526: 1524: 1516: 1503: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1460:Incidentally, 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1396: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1378: 1377: 1333: 1327: 1308: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1211: 1210: 1174: 1173: 1149: 1146: 1143:SchmuckyTheCat 1102: 1099: 1088: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1047: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1038: 974: 971: 943: 940: 925: 922: 921: 920: 919: 918: 917: 916: 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 896: 882: 881: 880: 879: 865: 863: 862: 843: 840: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 817: 816: 815: 814: 813: 812: 803: 802: 801: 800: 799: 798: 780: 779: 778: 777: 754: 753: 740: 739: 730: 729: 728: 727: 709: 708: 707: 706: 700: 699: 698: 697: 688:. You cited 671: 670: 669: 668: 662: 661: 660: 659: 658: 657: 648: 647: 646: 645: 631: 630: 629: 628: 609: 608: 607: 606: 592: 591: 558: 555: 554: 553: 552: 551: 546:old windy bear 529: 526: 516: 515: 508:wp:vpr current 504:wp:sig current 488: 470: 467: 466: 465: 464: 463: 462: 461: 368: 363: 362: 361: 360: 359: 300: 297: 281: 258: 254: 251: 250: 249: 215: 214:help requested 212: 189: 188: 187: 186: 185: 145: 142: 132:Pagan Alliance 127: 126:Pagan Alliance 124: 108: 94: 88: 85: 84: 79: 74: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4893: 4884: 4883: 4880: 4875: 4874:Imre's Images 4863: 4860: 4856: 4855: 4854: 4853: 4850: 4841: 4837: 4834: 4830: 4825: 4824: 4823: 4822: 4819: 4815: 4810: 4803: 4797: 4794: 4790: 4789: 4788: 4787: 4784: 4781: 4777: 4776: 4775: 4774: 4771: 4763: 4761: 4760: 4757: 4748: 4746: 4745: 4742: 4738: 4734: 4725: 4723: 4722: 4719: 4712: 4709: 4707: 4706: 4703: 4700: 4697: 4689: 4686: 4684: 4683: 4680: 4675: 4666: 4665: 4664: 4658: 4656: 4655: 4652: 4644: 4638: 4633: 4627: 4626: 4618: 4617: 4616: 4615: 4614: 4613: 4608: 4602: 4601: 4593: 4589: 4585: 4581: 4577: 4573: 4568: 4567: 4562: 4556: 4555: 4544: 4542: 4541: 4538: 4530: 4524: 4521: 4520: 4518: 4514: 4510: 4504: 4500: 4496: 4495: 4494: 4491: 4490: 4488: 4484: 4480: 4473: 4472: 4471: 4470: 4467: 4466: 4464: 4460: 4456: 4450: 4446: 4438: 4436: 4435: 4432: 4428: 4421: 4418: 4416: 4415: 4412: 4407: 4402: 4398: 4392: 4391: 4388: 4384: 4380: 4372: 4370: 4369: 4366: 4358: 4350: 4347: 4343: 4342: 4341: 4340: 4339: 4338: 4333: 4330: 4328: 4322: 4316: 4308: 4307: 4306: 4303: 4301: 4295: 4289: 4281: 4278: 4277: 4276: 4275: 4272: 4270: 4264: 4258: 4246: 4243: 4241: 4240: 4237: 4223: 4218: 4217: 4214: 4196: 4194: 4188: 4186: 4185: 4182: 4178: 4173: 4165: 4161: 4158: 4156: 4150: 4144: 4137:. Thanks. -- 4136: 4132: 4131: 4130: 4128: 4125: 4120: 4116: 4112: 4108: 4104: 4098: 4094: 4090: 4089: 4086: 4082: 4077: 4076: 4073: 4069: 4065: 4061: 4057: 4053: 4047: 4046: 4043: 4039: 4030: 4028: 4027: 4024: 4016: 4014: 4013: 4010: 4003: 4000: 3994: 3993: 3992: 3991: 3988: 3984: 3980: 3976: 3968: 3966: 3965: 3962: 3954: 3950: 3947: 3946:Mattythewhite 3943: 3939: 3938: 3937: 3936: 3933: 3932:Mattythewhite 3929: 3921: 3919: 3918: 3915: 3906: 3902: 3899: 3895: 3894: 3893: 3892: 3889: 3884: 3881:This article 3877: 3874: 3868: 3865: 3863: 3843: 3842: 3841: 3838: 3836: 3830: 3824: 3816: 3815: 3814: 3813: 3810: 3808: 3784: 3782: 3781: 3778: 3774: 3770: 3763: 3760: 3758: 3757: 3754: 3750: 3738: 3735: 3732: 3730: 3727: 3724: 3722: 3719: 3716: 3714: 3711: 3708: 3706: 3703: 3700: 3698: 3695: 3692: 3690: 3687: 3684: 3683: 3682: 3680: 3676: 3672: 3668: 3659: 3657: 3656: 3653: 3652: 3648: 3644: 3639: 3631: 3627: 3624: 3618: 3617: 3616: 3615: 3612: 3606: 3602: 3598: 3590: 3580: 3577: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3560: 3559: 3554: 3552: 3550: 3545: 3544: 3534: 3533: 3528: 3525: 3521: 3520: 3513: 3512: 3507: 3506: 3502: 3501: 3492: 3489: 3486: 3485: 3484: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3476: 3472: 3468: 3464: 3456: 3453: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3446: 3439: 3436: 3434: 3433: 3430: 3426: 3419:Re: Thank you 3418: 3396: 3393: 3392:Mattythewhite 3389: 3388: 3387: 3384: 3383:Mattythewhite 3380: 3379: 3378: 3375: 3374:Mattythewhite 3371: 3367: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3359: 3358:Mattythewhite 3355: 3354:Jim smith.jpg 3351: 3347: 3343: 3339: 3335: 3331: 3327: 3323: 3319: 3315: 3311: 3307: 3303: 3299: 3295: 3291: 3287: 3283: 3279: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3271: 3270:Mattythewhite 3267: 3266: 3265: 3262: 3261:Mattythewhite 3257: 3256: 3255: 3252: 3251:Mattythewhite 3248: 3247: 3246: 3243: 3242:Mattythewhite 3239: 3235: 3234: 3233: 3230: 3229:Mattythewhite 3225: 3218: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3209: 3208:Mattythewhite 3205: 3204: 3203: 3202: 3199: 3198:Mattythewhite 3191: 3189: 3188: 3185: 3176: 3174: 3173: 3170: 3161: 3155: 3152: 3149: 3145: 3143: 3140: 3137: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3128: 3125: 3121: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3111: 3108: 3104: 3097: 3094: 3088: 3085: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3076: 3072: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3065: 3062: 3054: 3052: 3049: 3045: 3044: 3038: 3036: 3031: 3027: 3023: 3021: 3013: 3011: 3010: 3007: 2999: 2987: 2984: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2973: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2961: 2954: 2953: 2952: 2949: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2937: 2931: 2927: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2917: 2907: 2901: 2899: 2898: 2895: 2891: 2883: 2881: 2880: 2877: 2869: 2867: 2866: 2863: 2855: 2853: 2845: 2839: 2837: 2836: 2833: 2828: 2822: 2820: 2819: 2816: 2811: 2809: 2804: 2801: 2795: 2793: 2790: 2789: 2786: 2782: 2774: 2770: 2768: 2763: 2760: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2750: 2746: 2738: 2736: 2733: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2715: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2696: 2692: 2684: 2682: 2681: 2678: 2677:Fethroesforia 2670:copied images 2669: 2667: 2666: 2663: 2660: 2652: 2646: 2643: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2633: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2622: 2618: 2610: 2606: 2604: 2603: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2584: 2577: 2574: 2572: 2569: 2566: 2563: 2557: 2555: 2549: 2547: 2546: 2543: 2535: 2531: 2529: 2526: 2522: 2515: 2513: 2512: 2509: 2500: 2498: 2497: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2483: 2476: 2474: 2473: 2470: 2466: 2463: 2460: 2457: 2449: 2448: 2445: 2440: 2437: 2431: 2429: 2428: 2425: 2419: 2416: 2413: 2407: 2405: 2404: 2401: 2396: 2393: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2375: 2373: 2372: 2369: 2366:-bob cargill 2364: 2361: 2354: 2352: 2351: 2348: 2338: 2335: 2330: 2326: 2323: 2322:Pascal.Tesson 2318: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2301: 2300: 2294: 2291: 2287: 2283: 2280: 2279: 2274: 2269: 2266: 2261: 2258: 2255: 2251: 2247: 2246: 2244: 2243: 2237: 2234: 2230: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2222: 2218: 2217:Pascal.Tesson 2214: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2198: 2190: 2179: 2176: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2166: 2165: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2155: 2152: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2138: 2133: 2128: 2116: 2109: 2107: 2106: 2103: 2099: 2094: 2091: 2083: 2081: 2080: 2077: 2075: 2067: 2065: 2064: 2058: 2054: 2048: 2045: 2038: 2030: 2026: 2023: 2018: 2013: 2012: 2009: 2006: 2001: 1996: 1990: 1989: 1986: 1983: 1979: 1978: 1973: 1970: 1969: 1963: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1951: 1947: 1945: 1942: 1941:Pascal.Tesson 1938: 1934: 1928: 1925: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1886: 1880: 1879: 1872: 1871: 1868: 1865: 1861: 1860: 1845: 1842: 1841:Politics rule 1838: 1837: 1836: 1833: 1828: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1818: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1809: 1807: 1806: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1794: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1766: 1756: 1752: 1751: 1748: 1740: 1738: 1737: 1734: 1732: 1719: 1717: 1716: 1713: 1705: 1698: 1694: 1691: 1689: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1679: 1677: 1671: 1669: 1660: 1654: 1651: 1648: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1635: 1632: 1630: 1624: 1618: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1604: 1601: 1584: 1578: 1574: 1569: 1564: 1553: 1547: 1543: 1538: 1533: 1522: 1517: 1512: 1508: 1507: 1501: 1493: 1490: 1486: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1471: 1468: 1463: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1421:and not meet 1420: 1416: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1376: 1373: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1337: 1332: 1328: 1326: 1325: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1306: 1302: 1299: 1297: 1291: 1285: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1271: 1270:Fitzpatrickjm 1267: 1264: 1263: 1260: 1259:Fitzpatrickjm 1256: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1235: 1234:Fitzpatrickjm 1231: 1228: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1209: 1206: 1202: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1193: 1192:Fitzpatrickjm 1189: 1186: 1185: 1182: 1181:Fitzpatrickjm 1178: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1164: 1163:Fitzpatrickjm 1160: 1157: 1153: 1147: 1145: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1131: 1127: 1126: 1123: 1121: 1117: 1111: 1100: 1098: 1097: 1094: 1086: 1082: 1079: 1076: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1059: 1056: 1053: 1045: 1037: 1034: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1025: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1016: 1014: 1008: 1002: 994: 990: 989: 988: 987: 984: 980: 972: 970: 969: 966: 965:Fitzpatrickjm 962: 961: 958: 957:Fitzpatrickjm 954: 951: 948: 941: 939: 938: 935: 931: 923: 915: 912: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 893: 888: 887: 886: 885: 884: 883: 878: 875: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 861: 858: 854: 850: 849: 848: 841: 833: 830: 828: 823: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 809: 808: 807: 806: 805: 804: 795: 791: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 781: 776: 773: 771: 767: 762: 758: 757: 756: 755: 752: 749: 747: 742: 741: 736: 732: 731: 725: 721: 717: 713: 712: 711: 710: 704: 703: 702: 701: 695: 691: 687: 683: 679: 678:verifiability 675: 674: 673: 672: 666: 665: 664: 663: 654: 653: 652: 651: 650: 649: 643: 639: 635: 634: 633: 632: 626: 621: 617: 613: 612: 611: 610: 604: 600: 596: 595: 594: 593: 588: 587: 586: 585: 582: 580: 576: 572: 568: 564: 556: 550: 547: 542: 537: 534: 533: 532: 531: 527: 525: 524: 521: 513: 509: 505: 501: 500:argumentation 497: 493: 489: 483: 476: 475: 474: 468: 460: 455: 451: 447: 441: 440: 439: 434: 430: 426: 420: 419: 418: 413: 409: 405: 399: 398: 397: 396: 391: 387: 383: 377: 374: 367: 364: 358: 352: 347: 346: 338: 331: 326: 325: 317: 316: 315: 311: 306: 298: 296: 292: 287: 279: 276: 275: 274: 273: 269: 264: 252: 248: 245: 241: 238: 236: 231: 230: 229: 228: 225: 221: 213: 209: 208: 203: 199: 196:Please visit 195: 193: 183: 182: 181: 178: 176: 175: 168: 167: 166: 165: 162: 160: 159: 152: 143: 141: 140: 137: 133: 125: 123: 121: 118: 114: 111: 106: 105: 102: 100: 93: 89: 83: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4871: 4845: 4829:Vernon White 4814:Vernon White 4811: 4807: 4767: 4752: 4729: 4715: 4692: 4671: 4662: 4648: 4624: 4599: 4579: 4569: 4553: 4548: 4545:Helping Hand 4534: 4507: 4506: 4477: 4476: 4453: 4452: 4442: 4424: 4411:AtomikWeasel 4393: 4387:AtomikWeasel 4376: 4373:Kurt Hellmer 4362: 4310: 4283: 4252: 4249: 4219: 4200: 4192: 4169: 4138: 4121: 4091: 4078: 4052:Inter-milano 4048: 4037: 4034: 4020: 4006: 3972: 3958: 3925: 3910: 3898:WarthogDemon 3888:WarthogDemon 3880: 3845: 3844:No problem! 3818: 3790: 3788: 3766: 3741: 3663: 3641: 3635: 3622:NeutralHomer 3610:NeutralHomer 3594: 3556: 3546: 3535:disruptive. 3531: 3474: 3470: 3466: 3462: 3461:I think the 3460: 3442: 3422: 3346:Adam griffin 3195: 3180: 3165: 3100: 3084:WarthogDemon 3075:WarthogDemon 3061:WarthogDemon 3058: 3055:AfD Question 3050: 3046: 3040: 3032: 3028: 3024: 3017: 3003: 2982:NeutralHomer 2971:NeutralHomer 2959:NeutralHomer 2947:NeutralHomer 2935:NeutralHomer 2915:NeutralHomer 2911: 2887: 2873: 2870:Turn it off. 2859: 2851: 2843: 2829: 2826: 2812: 2806:Ya, some of 2805: 2802: 2799: 2791: 2777: 2771:Deletion of 2766: 2742: 2734: 2731: 2688: 2673: 2656: 2614: 2607:Deletion of 2594: 2586: 2582: 2580: 2570: 2567: 2564: 2561: 2553: 2539: 2527: 2523: 2519: 2504: 2491: 2487: 2484: 2480: 2467: 2464: 2461: 2458: 2455: 2442:-bobcargill 2441: 2438: 2435: 2420: 2418:Thanx. -bc 2417: 2414: 2411: 2398:-bobcargill 2397: 2394: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2365: 2362: 2358: 2342: 2333: 2328: 2312: 2297: 2296: 2277: 2276: 2272: 2264: 2240: 2239: 2194: 2163: 2121: 2095: 2087: 2071: 2043: 2034: 2016: 1961: 1959: 1937:get to work! 1898:ck lostsword 1877: 1804: 1803: 1761: 1744: 1723: 1720:Well done... 1709: 1672: 1664: 1612: 1594: 1518: 1338: 1335: 1310: 1279: 1268: 1265: 1257: 1254: 1232: 1229: 1226: 1190: 1187: 1179: 1175: 1161: 1158: 1154: 1151: 1138: 1134: 1132: 1128: 1119: 1113: 1109: 1104: 1090: 1049: 1033:Weatherman90 996: 983:Weatherman90 976: 963: 955: 952: 949: 945: 927: 891: 864: 845: 793: 788: 734: 723: 719: 637: 623: 619: 598: 571:my talk page 560: 517: 472: 370: 341: 320: 256: 217: 205: 190: 173: 172: 157: 156: 147: 129: 115: 112: 107: 96: 65: 43: 37: 4397:Harold Ober 4383:Harold Ober 4365:IsraelXKV8R 4101:—Preceding 4038:was deleted 2876:IsraelXKV8R 2862:IsraelXKV8R 2832:IsraelXKV8R 2815:IsraelXKV8R 2808:Norman Golb 2785:Noetic Sage 2508:IsraelXKV8R 2493:IsraelXKV8R 2469:IsraelXKV8R 2444:IsraelXKV8R 2424:IsraelXKV8R 2400:IsraelXKV8R 2368:IsraelXKV8R 2250:Evilclown93 2221:Evilclown93 1873:Well done! 1791:Hurray! -- 1317:Great Lakes 694:red herring 482:archive box 469:Tiny things 36:This is an 4588:verifiable 4439:Censorship 4170:The image 3907:Lotta Tags 3643:Djminisite 3555:This user 3096:User:LukaP 2894:Langloisrg 2840:Toda Raba! 2611:Contestant 2532:Regarding 2044:MisterHand 1991:Congrats! 1793:Iamunknown 1321:Carcharoth 1247:ignorance. 1219:copyright. 853:Copyrights 766:WP:COMPANY 642:WP:ILIKEIT 512:labelmaker 502:section), 477:Check out 122:paanjasan 4406:The Visit 4320:seriously 4293:seriously 4262:seriously 4181:Steerpike 4148:seriously 3828:seriously 3632:Signature 3184:Grandia01 3118:See also 2728:Nice one. 2550:Now what? 2110:Congrats! 1982:Modernist 1864:Acalamari 1817:Acalamari 1805:Wizardman 1747:Dekkappai 1622:seriously 1319:as well? 1289:seriously 1135:rationale 1046:Easy now? 1006:seriously 934:Ned Scott 636:(3) - An 192:Wizardman 174:Wizardman 158:Wizardman 82:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 72:Archive 3 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 4879:Leitmanp 4842:Ask Mike 4741:Leitmanp 4679:Leitmanp 4517:contribs 4487:contribs 4463:contribs 4449:WP:CIVIL 4115:contribs 4103:unsigned 4097:Benkovac 4060:Benkovac 4056:Wermania 4023:Paulus89 4009:Benjwong 3999:Benjwong 3987:Benjwong 3955:Wherebot 3777:Nikki311 3773:Tag team 3753:Muchness 3591:Question 3576:Tiki God 3488:Tiki God 3471:at least 3467:anything 3429:Muchness 3148:Garion96 3136:Garion96 3124:Garion96 3107:Garion96 2739:Oobi.jpg 2536:and OTRS 2395:Please? 2209:Lsi john 2197:Bishonen 2189:DreamGuy 2074:lucasbfr 2057:Contribs 1921:Garion96 1764:Jreferee 1101:RFA note 1093:Wikidemo 792:It does 718:was met 528:Your RFA 520:Quiddity 344:howcheng 323:howcheng 117:panjasan 99:lucasbfr 3914:Thief12 3463:largest 3238:DSC-P72 3006:Sheep81 2714:Deskana 2699:Deskana 2662:Chovain 2591:lolicon 2542:Adambro 2164:Peacent 2102:Noroton 2022:Noroton 1779:Deskana 1712:Quadell 1552:meu RfB 1489:Noroton 1467:Noroton 1427:WP:DGFA 1372:Noroton 1349:Noroton 1341:comment 590:length. 573:and on 244:W.marsh 224:W.marsh 39:archive 4756:BURNyA 4645:Thanks 4592:WP:COI 4576:WP:AGF 4431:Krm500 4081:WP:ANI 4050:used: 3969:A bot? 3922:Images 3749:WP:PUI 3475:others 3192:Images 3182:only?? 3177:Photos 3162:Imgaes 3151:(talk) 3139:(talk) 3127:(talk) 3110:(talk) 3103:WP:PUI 2718:(talk) 2703:(talk) 2599:Jmh123 2595:Hikari 2587:Hikari 2583:Kikari 2334:WP:FUR 2317:WP:FUR 2309:WP:FUR 2290:WP:FUR 2219:& 2031:Thanks 2017:woulda 1924:(talk) 1830:again! 1783:(talk) 1699:Thanks 1688:DS1953 1676:DS1953 1521:my RfB 1502:My RfB 1462:here's 1139:excuse 1075:Humana 1055:Humana 827:DS1953 770:DS1953 746:DS1953 614:(2) - 603:WP:DEL 599:policy 579:DS1953 506:, and 454:Review 446:Xnuala 433:Review 425:Xnuala 412:Review 404:Xnuala 390:Review 382:Xnuala 151:WP:RFA 4793:Coren 4780:Coren 4770:Coren 4631:Chat 4625:Pedro 4606:Chat 4600:Pedro 4560:Chat 4554:Pedro 4537:JP419 4359:email 4326:folks 4299:folks 4268:folks 4154:folks 4124:LAz17 4093:No.13 4085:No.13 4072:No.13 4042:No.13 4017:What? 3961:Haemo 3834:folks 3736:from 3728:from 3720:from 3712:from 3704:from 3696:from 3688:from 3169:LukaP 2930:image 2408:thanx 2068:RfA?? 1950:Hoary 1884:Chat 1878:Pedro 1628:folks 1295:folks 1012:folks 932:. -- 911:Xoloz 892:every 874:Xoloz 857:Xoloz 790:days. 638:essay 239:from 144:admin 16:< 4718:Nard 4584:WP:N 4580:very 4513:talk 4499:here 4483:talk 4459:talk 4177:here 4111:talk 4083:. -- 4068:here 4066:and 4064:here 4040:. -- 4031:Why? 3942:here 3928:here 3679:here 3677:and 3675:here 3669:and 3651:Sign 3647:Talk 3352:and 3219:and 2926:site 2745:Oobi 2659:Mark 2568:-bc 2254:here 2228:way. 2084:Heh! 1994:Jmlk 1727:Scar 1485:WP:V 1431:WP:N 1423:WP:N 1419:WP:V 1415:WP:V 1367:WP:N 1363:WP:N 1345:WP:V 1110:Buck 1024:SGGH 761:WP:N 716:WP:N 690:WP:V 450:talk 429:talk 408:talk 386:talk 351:chat 330:chat 309:Toth 290:Toth 267:Toth 220:here 90:Re: 4827:=== 4764:CSB 4314:But 4287:But 4256:But 4235:n16 4212:n16 4142:But 4129:). 3996:--> 3822:But 3785:FYI 3465:of 2126:Hús 1730:ian 1616:But 1562:Hús 1531:Hús 1283:But 1120:ofg 1115:ets 1072:Vox 1052:Vox 1000:But 794:not 735:any 684:or 575:his 304:Aza 285:Aza 262:Aza 253:PUI 136:Deb 4831:- 4816:- 4702:ka 4699:on 4696:El 4628:| 4603:| 4557:| 4515:• 4505:. 4485:• 4461:• 4251:-- 4233:ma 4231:et 4229:rn 4227:Ho 4224:-- 4210:ma 4208:et 4206:rn 4204:Ho 4117:) 4113:• 4058:, 4054:, 3981:, 3977:, 3861:da 3849:Mi 3806:da 3794:Mi 3649:| 3645:- 3368:, 3348:, 3344:, 3336:, 3332:, 3328:, 3324:, 3320:, 3316:, 3312:, 3308:, 3304:, 3300:, 3296:, 3292:, 3288:, 3284:, 3280:, 3122:. 2346:VS 2245:. 2215:, 2211:, 2207:, 2203:, 2199:, 2136:nd 1967:as 1939:. 1881:| 1572:nd 1541:nd 1487:. 1203:-- 1078:8' 1058:8' 724:is 680:, 605:). 494:, 487:;) 485:}} 479:{{ 452:)( 444:-- 431:)( 423:-- 410:)( 402:-- 388:)( 380:-- 4323:| 4317:| 4296:| 4290:| 4265:| 4259:| 4151:| 4145:| 4109:( 3886:- 3858:n 3855:a 3852:r 3831:| 3825:| 3803:n 3800:a 3797:r 2336:. 2292:. 2267:. 2256:. 2131:ö 2059:) 2055:| 2051:( 2004:7 1999:1 1964:n 1962:A 1906:C 1904:• 1902:T 1900:• 1625:| 1619:| 1567:ö 1536:ö 1402:" 1292:| 1286:| 1009:| 1003:| 696:. 456:) 448:( 435:) 427:( 414:) 406:( 392:) 384:( 353:} 349:{ 332:} 328:{ 301:→ 282:→ 259:→ 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index