User talk:Butseriouslyfolks/Archive 3

4421:

that's useful to them and enjoyed by them. Me hosting an in-store so I could get images I could post sounds almost as efficient as lying in wait to pick off new images instead of maybe using some of your influence as an admin to make it easier for people to understand what pictures are allowed. I learned more useful information about what I can't upload from you than I did from reading what came up on the screen while I was uploading, or trying to wade through 1000 different pages of information linked to each other in the labyrinth of pages on uploading, creative commons, fair use, non-free images, and kitchen sink (no, wait) articles and guides that I tried to wade through. If a person could just be told what the hell a "non-free image" is, and that "a non-free image of an existing band" is not allowed, a whole lot of goddamn wasted time and frustration would be avoided. Why isn't there any "in a nutshell" type of summaries on uploading pictures, and why aren't you forcibly directed there when you try to upload? --

2414:. Did you check for the references to it in the scientific and popular press over a span of a hundred years, like New York Times articles over the decades on how it was a prestigious award given to noted scientists like Tesla for a lifetime of achievement? In the end an article like this should have gone to AFD where it probably would have gotten a snowball keep. It would also have brought in other editors who can assist in checking to see if some award or journal is a notable one. Please take time to distinguish which articles are and which are not deserving of speedy deletion. When someone finds a series of articles in an area they are not particularly conversant with and which look like candidates for deletion, a good strategy might be to nominate on for deletion via AFD so there will be other editors chiming in with refs to show they are notable. Thanks. 4153:

am largely responsible for their website and wrote much of their website content. I am a past president of the Irish support group. I am still a committee member. I can't understand why this short article was recently deleted while a similar article on the equivalent UK group (Cleft Lip and Palate Association) is left in situ, as is an article on a cleft charity "Operation Smile". I was most careful not to reproduce material verbatim from the Association's website (even though I wrote the original material), I did not copy and paste, I rewrote material espacially for the wikipedia article . Maybe you can enlighten me, and if something was amiss (though I can't imagine what) advise me on how to correct it. I look forward to hearing from you, Eddie Byrne

2504:

there mission statement. That would be incorrect and misleading if someone in turn visited the website and saw that the statement is different than what I listed. I had reference to the page, I cited, what else needs to be done to list such a thing? Other articles have mission statements listed, and they do not have a reference. So how would i put it on their if the way I am currently doing it is "wrong" in your opinion. You seem to be the only one so far that thinks it is done incorrectly. I just dont see why other articles list almost the exact same thing, but they aren't getting in copyright troubles. Please Explain.

2458:

to too many mistakes. Do you remember things like the "cookie-gate" which followed the last expansion of the CSD criteria? An admin started speedy deleting articles about cookies because he felt they now fell under the scope of G11 and chaos ensued. We can sit here and argue for a few hours on whether or not these were in fact deletable by the new letter of the policy but that's entirely beyond the point. These articles had been there for ages, had been edited by multiple people, none of which had ever thought of sending them to AfD and they had numerous incoming links. No, that doesn't mean that the articles

527:

it not. The last version of my article however, which you did not see of course, because you deleted it in the process of being written and rewritten, consists of five paragraphs. I'm afraid you're trying to defend your position without engaging in a constructive dialog with me. I don't know your approach to writing and am unable to guess it, but I find your attitude to be unbecoming of an administrator. You give me no credit for all the work I do here, and you allow me no time for the gradual building of an article, not even an hour or two. How does assuming good faith sound to you, I ask? --

920:...that's just creepy. I believe he already knew he was unblocked well before your decline was sent through, so I can only wonder if he was expecting to get an answer for that, as well as if he was waiting to archive his whole page after he got a request from that. I imagine that he planned on archiving his whole page earlier, as he had blanked part of it a day earlier, preparing to archive it, so it's interesting. I can only imagine if he was waiting more for the response before his block expired or 4233: 2521:, I am working on and tell me if you see any copyright problems. I am not sure, but on the things like Adobe and Autodesk, do I need to put the federal registration symbol after certain products. I know Autdesk and Maya both have the federal registration symbol following after them on the Autodesk website. I am also sure that Adobe has one following the words After Effects. How would I go about listing these to keep the article in good standing. 31: 1384:"Nonfree image only used in gallery in violation of WP:NFC" is not a valid criteria for speedy deletion, and the images were not in violation because they meet the significance criterion, in that people are able to identify the groups from their logos, which they are unable to do without the images, and they can't from text. Please restore the images, and list them on IFD if you believe the significance criterion is not met. 1267:

In my opinion, you have it out for me. You also went after my JAMRS article (...maybe because of your political leanings?) You cannot block me for trying to improve Knowledge by writing factual articles (definitely not vandalism) and citing sources. Look at my contributions. I have made MANY good contributions and I am even a member of a few Wikiprojects. I am dedicated to helping the community for everyone.

2748:) There was a great deal of concern that what has happened would happen. That is, many users and admins try to stretch the meaning much farther than it was ever meant to stretch. I have tended to be fairly reactionary on A7 because I think it is widely abused. This is at the edges. But I am very much of the "when in doubt, don't delete camp". I too am very interested to see where the consensus will fall. 2027:. Like the William Poole article, the articles for most U.S. Congressmen were copied directly from a U.S. Government web site. I think all congressmen articles were done as part of a project, so I assume they probably had a standard regarding how to reference the original source. It seems to me to be appropriate to adopt the same standard for U.S. Federal Reserve Bank presidents. -- 1216: 1296:. This is clearly an abuse of Administrative priviledges, and should not be allowed. Knowledge is based around a cautious and fragile balance between users and administrators, and allowing this kind of behaviour, which goes against everything Knowledge stands for, should not be tolerated. Sadly it happens all to often. I would even be more comfortable if another admin besides 2403:

to put a hoky sounding "This X is very notable because---" statement near the beginning of each article just to head off admins from speedily deleting it for lack of a claim of notability. The claim can be implicit in the article, and references can overcome the lack of such a formulaic claim being put in each and every article to head off someone on a deleting spree. For

448:

nowhere else would I find equally reliable information about the history of the mound. However, the fact, that the paragraphs I wrote conform to our encyclopedic format makes a whole lot of difference, and it does not warrant your action. And also, please don't lecture me about the perils of summaries around Knowledge, because that's what encyclopedias do. --

4052:. My upload log probably doesnt list them because i uploaded them a long time ago. They are probably not speedy deletion because they are I guess useful. My problem is that they are full of tiny mistakes, things I didnt cross-check. I would like to have them deleted. That is why I asked you if I can remove the permission I gave earlier. What do you think? 1876: 2473:

importance but it comes down to the good ol' principle of "when in doubt, don't delete" and the unwritten but fairly widely accepted corollary "when in doubt, send to AfD". Despite routine claims to the contrary, AfD actually works pretty well and if you're using twinkle, submitting something to AfD is not much more effort than speedy-deleting. Cheers,

557:. I had no idea whether you would be coming back or not. Also, it is beyond me how, after all the time I have spent considering your points and explaining my position, you could get the sense that I am not engaging in a constructive dialog with you, unless you are drawing that conclusion from the simple fact that I do not agree with your position. -- 1228: 2443:

that anyone would be willing to rescue these articles from deletion, speedy was not the way to go. That rule of thumb is a safe way to avoid potential mistakes and, just as importantly, unnecessary drama. This is sort of like conflict of interest situations: perception of admin abuse is almost as damaging as abuse itself. Cheers,

3838:. In addition to the similarities in editing choices, one seems completely silent (via edit history) while the other ID is editing, and vice versa. I not sure that this is worth an IP check, but if they are issuing from the same IP, it would be somewhat odd that they would be arguing in concert in the same article. - 4431:

Creative Commons liscences are allowed. Why, god, WHY isn't it easy to get these questions answered? (Not to mention the question of why you spend your time striking down images, which you've pointedly ignored responding to five times. Maybe it's none of my business, but you haven't even said that.) --

163:

years in the Linux domain. There are plenty of references to it, and it is a well known productivity tool for users of GNOME based GUIs. It is available as a package for many of the popular linux distributions. To put it simply, just because *you* don't know about it, does not mean that is "not of note".

624:. You don't need my permission to do so. I assumed you understood this, because you are an experienced editor and because I said as much above. If you did not understand it, I can see why you would think I was being unreasonable when I actually wasn't. In any event, I hope you weren't referring to 4310:

On September 18, you directed me to send an email to the address you specified. I did so immediately after you gave your instructions. That was two days ago. I have received no response, nor has any template been placed on the page. At what date should I assume something has gone awry and no response

4152:

You have deleted the article on the "Cleft Lip and Palate Association of Ireland", and I don't understand why you have done this? The article is short and summarises the Association and what they do. It does not violate any copyright information and is not a cut and paste job either. I should know, I

3806:

This article was hardly promotional, our users primarily find ultrastar deluxe by word of mouth and online magazines and forums. basically i just illustrates what the features of ultrastar deluxe were and why we branched off from the original ultrastar. could you please let me put the stuff back into

3565:

and parts of it also appear on Sealed Knot sites. This is because the original writer, Alan Wicks has given permissions for his work to be used there as well as in my article. Alan is a personal friend, an ex C.O. of Slannings Regiment and a long standing member of the Sealed Knot, hence the material

3560:

Hi there, My contribution on Sir Nicholas Slanning has fallen foul of a copyright problem. This article is almost entirely derived from material supplied by Alan Wicks, taken from 'The Crucible and the Gun', a work in progress. Alan has given full permission for the material to be used in Knowledge.

1478:

The fact that a nonfree image is relegated to a gallery means it is not significant. If it were significant, it would stand on its own in the section of the article that discusses it in enough detail to make it significant. These were being used disruptively because at least two editors had removed

982:

You are to stop disturbing the work which tries to introduce truth. You are too revengeful (vindictive). It is too frequent to claims of the deletion about my articles. How many times did you require of deletion claims for my articles until now? You have misunderstanding about the derivative work. In

783:

for sd as not english. It does have a stub article on russian wikipedia so my understanding is that therefore it should be speedied rather than tagged {{notenglish}} - but the article here is larger than on RU wikipedia. Am I Right or Wrong? Thanks, and sorry to bug you - that's the joy of adminship!

526:

I'm not sure if I understand this. You said that all I did was to change "a few words here and there". I just copied the official webpage off my screen and pasted it into Microsoft Word for a page count. The webpage consists of 14 pages of text in letter size format, some of it relevant, but most of

290:

Thanks for the feedback, we do have a problem with adding references for these proteins, since there are hundreds of papers on the ones we chose for the first run of the bot. Far too many to add all of them to the articles! If we can filter these so that only the review articles are added, this might

4343:

But, seriously folks...k, bad pun. Anyway, I just wanted to say that it does seem to qualify under G6 housekeeping at least; in cases where I've had to request {{|tl|db-move}}s to move xxxx (disambiguation) to xxxx, they've always deleted the talk page of the new xxxx page since there was never any

3830:

Since one of the points of contention was one of semantics, I have offered discussion addressing the two points of contention, essentially a problem of peacocking semantics. The editor essentially refuses to consider any of the arguments, and inserts his edits as the consensus from Discussion. While

2457:

is limited to "Unremarkable people, groups, companies and web content" and in particular does not apply to awards or journals. This is not an accident: many, including myself, argued for a slightly wider scope but there was not sufficient consensus for it because many were worried that this may lead

2402:

article has a similar puffery-sounding statement that it is a distinguished award ( I will not tag that with {{fact}} because common sense and a familiarity with the area of knowledge the article represents tells me it is true, but refs exist to substantiate it). I think it demeans Knowledge to have

2397:

Please re-read carefully the criteria and the process for speedy deletion. Whatever prompted you to delete this article? Was it ever even tagged for possible deletion? Did you note the references in the form of external links? The explicit statement that it was the oldest article in its field? I see

2371:

notable. Well, almost all of them. Unfortunately, there are a lot of articles like that in Knowledge, which need someone who knows the subject to properly evaluate. The best solution would be to improve the article -- but I have no good idea of how to do that. (It would help if I knew how to write a

2356:

at the wrong time, & Mikka being grumpy didn't help matters. Sometimes a kind word can help bridge things over & sometimes thay can't -- but you don't know until you try. That's all I was trying to say. You meant well, so don't let one mistake get you down; learn from it & move on. Best,

1993:

to justify wholesale deletion of images from Knowledge which is resulting in destructive edits to many pages, and a flawed editing process where editorial discussions and decisions that should be made on article talk page are instead being made on IfD. While your edit may be sound from a consistency

1266:

The dispute over the Jon Greenspon article was in the process of being resolved. There was an active discussion on the talk page and I had friendily agreed to reword the copyvio contents. You did not have to delete the entire article. You were not in on the discussion concerning it at the beginning.

877:

blocked at 02:00 UTC, more than four hours before you declined his request. I know that you were right in responding to the request, but I think it's interesting in noting that it wasn't necessary, as he was already blocked. I'm sorry; I just wanted to point this out to you :D Personally, I think

4382:

other images I've uploaded, just because I caught your attention by back-talking you. Including one no one else has had a problem with for a week, which prompted me to finally proceed with more today. How could a copyright holder ever possibly object to a promo image being used to identify? What

4368:

I can see why so few articles have images, figuring this crap out is maddening. And then there are apparently people who get their jollies lying in wait to pick off images while the uploader is in the process of learning and thinks he just might have figured something out, after hours and multiple

3986:

Very simply: I have a few figures of mine around here, namely some family trees. And it happens that I'm not so happy with the idea of having this figures around here anymore. I would like to remove them. If I was still a sysop here, I would delete them myself (and suffer the consequences, I know).

2503:

Would you please explain to me why you keep removing the Mission Statement, Vision Statement, so on. It does have a copyright, but I cannot change what they consider thier mission statement. If I were to change it, it would not be there mission statement anymore. It would be something that I say is

2282:. These were could hardly be considered a copyright infringement as they were just an extremely straightforwardly-worded explaination of what the Union is, and the rest of the page was not copied at all. I think notability was also explained in the article, which noted that the Union had hosted the 2146:

And for some reason, I actually like editing Knowledge, despite trying to find excuses for myself to get out of any form of work in school. And I actually enjoy working here. Cool. I think I want to become an admin someday. I'm not expecting it to be very much more than a few extra priveledges, but

1147:

who is a big film actor over there and is known internationally . But other than this I can't really find anything else on it. Also the imdb says 1997 not 2007!! Maybe I should just let this one go - but please please if you ever have an issue with a new film again please contact me and I'll try to

1024:

This screen capture is the one scene of my video. I found the scene resembls the one scene of "the Battle of China" when I watched "the Shangahi Document" in the early of this year. So, I drew the comparison between these two scenes, as a result, these two scenes tuned to be the same one. I have

897:

Hehe technically, he was blocked at 02:00 UTC... just two days earlier :) My lesson: make sure all the words in my statement make sense with all the other words. Anyway, if Jmfangio noticed that, I'm sure that he would be glad that you didn't unblock him. If you did decide to accept his request,

661:

I would appreciate if you answered on your own Talk page, but the choice is yours of course. I do prefer to see all the threads, instead of just the replies. Anyhow, I subscribe to 1RR policy especially with people I don't know that's why I did not want to go over your decision to delete. I assumed

447:

Sorry, but I have to disagree. Paraphrasing of the source is not a copyright violation. Besides, I compacted over a dozen pages from the official website into five solid paragraphs... before I was hit with your decision in the middle of my last edit. The importance of my source is undeniable, since

235:

was deleted, and I believe incorrectly. It was initially flagged as a possible copyright violation by a bot (can't see which one anymore). Soon after that, I put the indicated "hangon" template there and added a note to the talk page, as instructed. As far as notability, this page was created in

174:

Your deletion has had a cascading effect, because now, since you've deleted this article, it left a broken link in another article. That article has since been edited to remove that broken link, and the content that went with it. Meaning that, yet again, there is an ambiguity problem on the Wiki in

4420:

I'm saying that I don't understand why someone enjoys spending their time following the rules and undoing what others are trying to do to improve articles, rather than doing something creative yourself. Doing work that dissapoints and frustrates Knowledge users and editors, instead of doing stuff

4406:

You don't make the rules, you just masturbate to them. I'm very curious why you do what you do, spending so much time doing something aggressive, and hurtful to other editors, and harmful to the quality of articles. I understand why the Wikimedia Foundation cares, whether I agree or not... but I

2593:

Hi there, I work for Omnicell, and just found out that our page was deleted by you due to blatant advertising. I've been assigned the task of restarting this page - purely fact this time around. Is this possible, or is there a permanent block on the name? (I'm brand new to Wiki editing.) Please

2041:

Please see the note attached to my user-page with regards to copyright violation. History of Blacks and the HOlocaust does not violate copyright as it is a USHMM article whose use on the public domain has been cleared with both Knowledge and the Holocaust Museum. Please get back to me as soon as

416:

This is a common problem when an article is written from a single source. I recommend that you study multiple sources that discuss the subject, then put them aside and write from scratch, adding details later in your own words after re-consulting your sources. That way, you'll have a much better

265:

You cannot slap a copyright on information that is already public domain (The Stanford website has also clearly linked to this information, click the "LocusLink" and follow the info to its source). Therefore I ask that you either un-delete the page, or allow us to recreate it (which won't take us

199:

That said, I realize the article was short, and didn't contain a lot of information. I entered it as a "stub" so that I could come back to it and flesh it out more fully when time permitted. Perhaps if you had followed the correct process (outlined on the page that you directed me to re-read), you

4396:

I meant I was out of trying to upload any new pictures for the time being. You took in my frustration and what you figured was that I'd be okay with you striking down the one image I thought I'd done right? A picture which no editor in a week thought had anything wrong with it, until one that I

3530:

What this comment signals to me is that you are not recognizing that you too have a POV -- just like the rest of us. If you aren't capable of recognizing that you too have a POV, you aren't going to be able to recognize when your edits are introduing your POV. And you won't be able to recognize

2472:

Hey, we all make mistakes and Mikka certainly did not handle this with the necessary tact but ultimately he's correct in pointing out that these were mistakes. Again, I'm not saying all things related to the IEEE should be kept or that these articles should not do a better job of signifying their

2442:

Look, I've been often criticized of overusing speedy deletion so this is not coming from an inclusionist quack. But I do think you need to realize you made a mistake. It's fine to hold the belief that this or that article needs to be deleted but unless you can honestly say that you never imagined

1629:

I'm sorry you are unable to imagine it, but I was looking at footage on ogrish.com last week which had an insurgency group logo and Arabic text which I can't read. With your deletions, how am I supposed to figure out which of the dozen or so groups created the video? It seems to me that you are

1245:

In this case it was just too obvious. Also, the username policy does permit blocks of those whose usernames resemble vandals. Its just funny how I saw the name when I was just logging on the night before to briefly check my new messages, the incident boards, the block logs, and the new username

595:

I started the article earlier and saved it in its raw form, so I could have a dinner. But what boggles my mind most is that you and I are talking about it for more than an hour now and you're not at all interested in what I did to it. Why don't you reinstate the article and let me save it, so you

4213:

Yeah, you're right of course, civility (or better: plain old courtesy) seems to be going down the drain, but perhaps mikkalai has the TRUTH (TM) on his side. Obviously the subject of the article is notable after all, so I don't mind one way or the other; it's a wiki after. Anyway, thanks for the

4002:

You deleted the biographical entry for Barbara McMartin erroneously believing there was a copyright violation because similar text was previously published in ADKSportFitness. That periodical recieved the text that was used in this biography from me. They did not write it. Goodness gracious, I'm

1896:

evading my questioning whether he's tamagawaboat or not. Tamagawaboat is pretty famous for his original fake of nanking video and he seems to have visited many websites and blogs posting his rhetoric, especially in response to Ted Leonis's new Nanking documentary that's airing at the end of this

1581:

I can't imagine anybody saying, "I didn't fully understand this article until they added the group logos, but now it makes more sense to me." Therefore, as far as I'm concerned, the images do not increase understanding of the article on the insurgency in any way. The Foundation's image licensing

162:

Did you bother to research the topic before decided it was "not of note"? Did you go to www.google.com and enter the phrase "Powershell X11" and see the large amount of hit results that came back? How about reading those results? This is a piece of software that has been widely in use for over 7

3749:

Okay, I understand the problem with the watermark. I won't be doing that again. But how does the image not contribute to the understanding of the article? If it doesn't, then there is no reason for the King James or American Standard versions to have their title pages posted on their respective

1530:

doesn't say anything like that. It says: "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. Non-free media files are not used if they can be replaced by text that serves a

1073:

And I rewrote it into my own words after I recieved a copy note. Please show some respect. Did you not even check the film out? I believe that notability was asserted. I have put a great deal of work into wikipedia and I do not appreciate you doing that. Please restore it and I'l' have a go add

742:

professional writer and have had hundreds of articles published over a period of 40 years, and I have never encountered such mindless editing. I'm sorry that you have a serious mental disorder (Asperger's syndrome)but that does not give you license to ignore common rules of writing and editing.

1930:

No really. I kid you not. Hmm........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................I

741:

You deleted material that was not in violation of any copyright. The original source was clearly identified and referenced and an external link was provided as well. Your action is totally indefensible and unwarranted, and I intend to take this to mediation and arbitration, if necessary. I'm a

4430:

I don't see how "in a nutshell" could possibly make people upload more images that aren't allowed than hoping they'll read vast rules that no one can understand does... Basic, basic stuff like what the definition of a "non-free" and "unreplaceable" are remains a mystery to me. As does which

2410:

a book on electrical engineering, "Electric Energy: An Introduction" By Dr Mohamed A El-Sharkawi, 2005, which states explicitly that the Edison medal is "the most coveted prize in electrical engineering in the United States." In Google Scholar for the Edison Medal you will find 345 citations

380:

Please reconsider your deletion. I already put tons of work into this article and I'm in the process of editing it at this moment. The Kościuszko Mound Homepage was a best place to start. Nowhere else would I find such thorough description of the subject. I intend to add more data and supply

342:

Re alleged copyright infringement in "Critical Test Result Management" -- if this is copyright infringement then so is the source cited by the editor because they took the information from the same place we did. It's not copyright infringement when the original source is clearly credited and

168:

The above copyright flag was due to the fact that I initially just copied and pasted some information from the main webpage for the program, because I didn't have a lot of time to write an article. I saw that message, and I immediately wrote up a different article that stated the same basic

628:

as a formality (although I can't think of anything else you would think I was hiding behind). One more thing: I see you prefer to move all discussions to other people's talk pages, but could you leave this one here until we're done with it? It would be a little easier for me. Thanks.

3906:

Hello, would you please undo your action to delete the pages I put in - yes, I wrote some stuff and copied a bit more from some website - then a notice was put up and I deleted the rest. There was no copyright violation by then, and it should not have been deleted. Please put it back.

4383:

the hell does "unreplaceable" mean? Why would a person enjoy striking down images instead of helping the images' appropriateness be known? If you understand this barrage of jargon, can you figure out a fair use rationale, or whatever? Wouldn't that improve Knowledge more? --

3360:

thanks for restoring the page. As i understand the page now being displayed when i try to access the page, it would be enough to "send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication". Would it be enough if the main author, David Wirmer, mentioned on this page

2022:

article. I wanted to let you know why I made the change. You had changed the References section to an Attribution section and spelled out the entire URL with an accompanying explanation. For both aesthetic and consistency purposes, I have changed the section title and syntax to

200:

could have requested that the original author add more detail, references, add content to assert the notability, etc.. Which I would have gladly done. Now, I have to redo a lot of typing, which will consume my time, before I can even start at writing a more detailed article.

552:

does not require me to give people more time to eliminate a copyvio. When I deleted the article, it was about 9 hours old and had not been edited in almost 3 hours, much more than the "hour or two" you complain I didn't give you. It was the oldest outstanding item at

685:

There was nothing for us to agree about on talk, since you were advocating a version of the article I hadn't seen. And I did invite you to recreate it up front. But I guess we can chalk this up to a misunderstanding. Good luck with the article! Interesting topic.

3538:

Because I recognize that, like everyone, I have a bias, and that I might lapse in my efforts to keep it out of article space, I take expressions of concern over a perceived POV seriously. So, I ask those who express that concern to explain their concern to me.

2835:

Hello I want to tell you that the article was about a notable personality and I don't think it should have been deleted.You may not be knowing the person but that doesn't mean you should delete some one's article.I kindly request you not to do it again in future.

4445:

Why would fanart with GFDL count as unfree? It's not been copyrighted, I've given credit to the person responsible for the original character design and I made it. It's my work. Please don't delete it. I worked seriously hard on it and those pictures are needed.

3379:

i now followed the advice on the copyright page and have put the copyleft icon and the letters "GFDL" on the bottom of the orignial page. GFDL is linked to the wikipedia license page. I hope this to be enough. I will restore the page by tomorrow. —Preceding

144:

Please explain why you had a problem with this, and felt the need to delete the article. Please also explain why you did this without contacting the author (me), discussing it on the talk page, or leaving any commentary about why this was done. Thanks, Troy

2462:

exist but it does indicate a passive consensus that they belong and strongly suggests that the community would appreciate being consulted before deletion. Just be a bit more conservative about speedy deletion: this is what the community entrusted you to do.

2195:

Hi I see the image was captioned "Courtesy of South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria", which I believe is a botanical research institute. Was there reason to believe that the image was being used without that Institute's permission? Cheers

1429:

This images you have listed were only being used for an improper purpose, and disruptively too I might add. Nonfree images cannot be used in a gallery. Period. I will not be restoring these images. You may take it to deletion review if you disagree.

381:

additional sources later. I hope you don't expect me to replace every single word with a different word to make it sound original. The subject is of great national importance for the Cracovians and it deserves meticulous approach. Thanks in advance. --

471:

Changing a few words here and there and rearranging the sequence of sentences does not eliminate the underlying copyright violation. Copyright covers more than just the verbiage used. This article was identified as a possible copyright violation by

4033:

So how long is this the biography going to stay in limbo? I have submitted a statement releasing this to Knowledge. Ten minutes of work will show you that the same text that appeared in ADKSportFitness also appeared in the other newspapers I listed.

2243:

Hi there, I'm uploaded a new image of a short tailed albatross yesterday and you removed it(according to the logs) why? This was my image(i.e. I ownwed it). I uploaded my image as my image was of better quality when compared to the older one. James

4369:

attempts, stamping down his interest in trying anymore... when if he'd just been able to leave the computer thinking he'd done something but returned the next day to find out he'd made a mistake, he might not have been so demoralized. I'm out. --

185:

Regarding the Wiki notability policy that you directed me to, I did read it prior to posting, and I'm well aware of the policies that direct the content editing of Knowledge. Ironically, you seem to have missed the section in that article entitled,

3345:

Hi. You seem to have deleted the page i created yesterday. Certainly there are no copyright violations, as i am the co-author of this text. I hope my page is not gone for good, would you please restore it for me or tell me how i can restore it?

1461:"Period?" Do you believe that galleries of nonfree images which meet the significance criterion may be included? If not, why not? It seems to me that the policy is clear about that. And, why do you say that they were being used disruptively? ← 3519:

We all have biases. We all have POVs. That shouldn't keep us from contributing to the wikipedia. When we contribute to the wikipedia we have to try to be aware of our POV and make a conscious effort to keep it out of our contributions.

2924:

There are other articles that I will be submitting to wikipedia in english as well as french and vietnamese. I also hold copyrights on these articles - what would be the proper procedure to prevent further copyrights-related deletions?

402:

The article that was posted was just a paraphrase of sections of the subject's official website and therefore a copyright violation. Its speedy deletion is without prejudice to recreation of the article in a way that does not violate

596:

could have a fresh look? The unsaved article is sitting on my screen in a separate window. But instead, you keep on disagreeing with me on the talk pages, while hiding behind formalities. This is what I mean by an attitude problem. --

3642:

located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!

327:

Working on the above article, I notice that you removed a Commons image from the article as "rm fair use images of photos taken by subject of article used to illustrate article on photographer contrary to WP:FU)". Could you explain

983:

this case, the derivative work was carried out by US government. The credit of this work is being assured by the US government. All of the copyright problems may have been settled by US government. Don't you trust US government? --

2920:

After taking time to release said article to the GFDL liscence by writing to 'info-en-c@wikipedia.org' and 'permissions@wikimedia.org' under Ticket #2007072910017779, I submitted it again, but it seems to have been deleted again.

3511:

I replied that while your perception of a biased POV could mean there actually is a biased POV in the material that raises your concern, it is equally worth considering that the material that triggered your concern complied with

2757:

Please reread WP:CSD--I understand it very clearly to say that any claim of importance is sufficient to escape speedy, whether or not it is sufficient to pass afD. There have been repeated suggestions to eliminate A7 altogether.

3807:

the original ultrastar article at least in the ultrastar deluxe paragraph like how there is a ultraNG paragraph. i do not havve a backup of what i wrote i would be very pleased if you could give me a copy. b4 you deleted it

3926:

Please save me the trouble of rewriting what was there anywhere. If you'd checked the history before you'd deleted you'd see I had put it in my own words. Please don't be stubborn. You were wrong to delete it. Put it back.

3152:

Previously accused of using copyright material I rewrote the article, now you have decided to delete it. I was unaware that a list of jobs was in any way copyrightable! I'd be grateful if you could put the article back up.

205:

How has this helped anyone? It has just cost me time and effort, recreating the work I have already done, as well as forcing me to spend my time discussing it here. Administration should help the community, not impede it's

1726:

I'm not trying to understand the article, I'm trying to understand the Iraqi insurgency, its subject, and being able to figure out which one of them published a video is certainly an increase in my understanding of them.

2398:

that some of the other IEEE articles now have puffery-sounding statements that they are "respected" or "notable" which should head off similar speedy deletions. But some of those have been tagged as needing sources. The

3542:

If you look back at all our exchanges you will see me repeatedly politely asking you to be specific. And, you will see that you blow off my requests for explanation, both of your concerns, and of your editing choices.

3779:

the image used is entirely my own work as it is a screenshot of a program that was written by my team. we also posted this up on sourceforge as screenshots for the program. may you explain why the article was deleted

129:

It was completely accurate and documents a somewhat well known software tool for the GNOME environment. Specifically, this page was created today to provide disambiguation between this software and the newly released

262: 1142:

Yes I figured thanks. You actually seem to be right about this one -I can't find to many sources covering the film and I can see what you mean about the plot. The only claim to notability really is that it stars

3876:

Well, it has been recreated, and it does not appear to have been significantly changed. Additionally, notability would be in question. I did a quick search prior to deletion of the original page, and found zero

4096:

I have emailed as you specified. Will I receive notification that I may restore the submission or, if not, may I simply restore the entry now, or if not, what is the next communication I should expect receive?

106:

and look at Posts 167 and 168. Does Mr. Solt need to specifically say "my images are under the GDFL copyright license and they can be modified, redistributed, and used for any purpose," or is everything okay?

4066:

I will gladly follow Knowledge's procedures to get this biography back up, but, frankly, I'm not sure what is the next step. After following various links I am no more enlightened than before. Please clarify.

1825:

My only problem is that I have to be away for four hours. I will create stubs and set up an RFC as soon as I get back. If you don't trust me you can leave them undeleted and I'll just put them in as redlinks.

992:

The point is, somebody could have created that picture just last month and hold the copyright to it. We have no information on whether or not that picture is actually free. We know that screen captures from

2452:

I hate to play wise old man but I really think you're missing the point. Blindly applying the letter of CSD is a bad idea. CSD was born out of a compromise and it is purposely narrow in scope. For one thing,

4397:

just happen to have smarted off "has a problem" with it. What prompts a person to lie in wait and strike down new uploads, and then go after previous contributions by someone who's talked back to them? --

3975:

Hello! I saw you a lot in image copyright pages, so I'm guessing you may answer my question: can I remove a copyright tag that I myself included in an image created by me? And if yes, what happens? Thanks,

2619:

I have another question for you. Is it possible to find out who wrote the original two articles? If its another employee, I want to make sure that he/she doesn't edit my entry. Thank you for your help.

4514:. There are still a bunch of tagged images on there. Are you going to finish it (since I saw you already working on 25 July). Otherwise I will work on it, I just hate edit conflicts when working on PUI. 619:

To answer your question, because I don't have to reinstate it in order for you to repost it. As I said in my very first paragraph above, you are free to recreate the article as long as it complies with

873:. Now, this doesn't mean anything now, but I think it's kinda interesting in pointing out that you declined Jmfangio's block request at 06:21 UTC. This is interesting because Jmfangio was actually 241: 3508:

You assert that you can recognize POV when you see it. You assert that when you think you perceive a POV in someone else's contribution, that proves that contribution is written from a biased POV.

2964:

I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be attributed to me

1863:. We should bring this to light, as the pictures the socks have uploaded not only violates copyright, but also smell strongly of original research as evidenced from these shitty websites. Also, the 3199:

Okay, now I get it, and thanks. I am tired - really tired, and thus very slow when it comes to humor these days, especially at Knowledge. I thnk you for your efforts and am sorry I was so thick.

3027:

I know! What you said is the same stuff other people are telling me. But, i usually dismiss it as nonsence. Please don't correct me anymore and leave me alone, unless it is really important. --

3435:

But, now that I have brought it to your attention I hope you will either agree that your concerns have been answered, and the tag can be removed -- or you will return there and offer a reply.

3220:

Are you sure that was a blatant coypvio? I was just looking at the history, and it looks like it went at least a partial rewrite, but I didn't get through all the diffs before you deleted it.

2562:

for deletion were thet being used in any articles? If so, which ones? Right now they are only on talk pages and I would like to see how the images were used in an encyclopedic context. Thanks

3293:

Hey please don't delete this page. I have started "eMarket Trading Platform" in sourceforge.net in 2004. And I have listed the project in ohloh.net. If you have any questions please visit,

194:. You also did not follow that process. In fact, you simply, deleted a page without any process at all, and without having sufficient knowledge of the topic to make a responsible decision. 180:

Please do not delete other people's work without a) dicussing it first b) doing some basic research or c) having a significant knowledge of the domain that you are making decisions about.

175:

relation to the term "Powershell". That was the purpose of my edits - to remove that ambiguity, and now that work has been completely undone, and the information here is less accurate.

1545:

As you can see, the actual text of the significance crierion is met. I am sorry that you were under the impression that it had to do with being in a gallery, but as you can see from

343:

referenced. Sorry you think there's spam in this article, but that's your lame opinion. If someone disagrees with any of the information in the article, they should say so and why.

4125:

Reminds me of this one guy once employed in my group at work, who used to include details about his spiritual life, including any recent exorcisms, in his Weekly Activity Reports.

276:

I've recreated the page and added references to establish notability. You might be interested in the Village pump discussion we had before we embarked on this project, the link is

4296:

Wow, that was a pretty quick deletion. Overall, I have to question when I see professional-looking images (especially drawings and things that aren't pictures) here on Knowledge.

263:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=gene&Cmd=ShowDetailView&TermToSearch=5468&ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Gene.Gene_ResultsPanel.Gene_RVDocSum

3724:

That doesn't tell me anything. What is "watermarked"? And how does it violate copyright any more than an image of Darth Vader, for example, violates the copyright to Star Wars?

1853:

Hello, Rabota (or his socks) says he made the video, also he probably made the "fake (sic) of nanking" video too. The same conclusion can also be drawn from his first user page

2205:

That's right, you were ignorant enough to delete a topic you know nothing about. You know nothing about the topic because it's not in the encyclopedia you very smart person.

1123:

Since when does a book have to be written about a film huh??? Have you not seen the thousands of similar (or worse even) film articles on wikipedia? At least restore it in my

3827:, I would like to ask for your assistance. The same editor tha tI was accused of edit-warring with (Paul h.) has begin edit-warring in the article since the blocj was lifted. 3240:. As part of the Opera Wikiproject, I am translating this from the German Knowledge. It should all be in English in about 20 minutes. Thanks for your concern! In good faith, 662:

that if I'm unable to convince you on Talk, there would be no point in saving the article again in Main space. I will do it now though. And will work on it again tomorrow. --

3712:

What exactly is wrong with the image of the RSV Title Page, that it has been deleted twice now? Isn't my fair use rationale good enough? Why can't the page have that image?

2744:

I've been around long enough that I remember the quite contentious debate over making A7 part of the speedy criteria. (It was new enough that it generated a question on my

237: 3185:

and essential to making it clear that the protection was not done in a partisan way. PS I do not question your intentions but I acted in a considered and deliberate way.

2325: 2810:

Hey, thanks for the compliment. Yeah, I seem to be heading head-first into Knowledge. I never thought I would be participating in those kinds of discussions that fast.

2793:

Just read your comments re the re-created entry, and wanted to say thanks both for your compliments on the improvement and for all your efforts, which are appreciated.

190:, and the detailed processes for how to handle such situations. There is only one option for deletion in that list, and it requires following the processed outlined in 3461: 1816:

How about if we put the question of whether the gallery satisfies the significance criterion up on an RFC, and agree to abide by the consensus of uninvolved parties? ←

4545:

Thanks for your assistance on resolving the Barbara McMartin copyright issue. I am grateful the article is in place in time for the second anniversary of her demise.

1314:

No, in reply to your question, I don't have any COI in this matter, as I mentionned above I even suggested that another Admin block him/her, just so long as it isn't

898:

then he might be frustrated that you did it after his block expired. Ugh... but that's all in the past now. I'm sorry, but I really had to mention this to you :)

2648:

I'm soon gonna start participating in collaborations with other editors in order to make certain articles FA-class! I've already decided to work on the following:

2019: 2012: 855:) talk page. Are you an admin? Perhaps we can get someone to step in and quiet things, hopefully by warning or blocking the user, not edit protecting the page 2286:

and the German national championship, not to mention being a combined society of Berlin's major uniserities. I'm very surprised that the page has been deleted.

2133:

You'd be surprised how... introverted I am. I just don't have a lot of interest in socializing with people, or playing sports, etc. But here, it's different.

2917:

Since 23:51, 10 January 2006, 2 attempts have been made to create the 'Grand Master Nam Anh' article, all of which were removed due to copyright violations.

2781:

As I understood you and others, that's acceptable per WP processes as the article was speedied, not debated in AfD, so I'd appreciate your giving it a look.

258: 3393: 2408: 2179:? Howcheng has been less active recently (vacation?), and I tried to answer the editor's question, but I don't have access to the deleted revision. -- 3488:

You placed this tag, without explaining what aspect of the file you think does not comply with policy. IMO this is (1) not responsible; (2) not civil.

2745: 417:

article that isn't simply a summary of an already readily available website, and it most likely will not infringe anybody's copyright. Good luck! --

138:

redirects to Windows powershell, the new commercial product, and there is no article describing the much older open-source project with the same name

2024: 3679: 3365:) as responsible person, would send this email? Or do i have to ask the local network administrators to install an account @egsamp.uni-koeln.de ? 2865: 2057: 1686: 1597: 1502: 1445: 1055: 761: 701: 644: 572: 513: 432: 362: 310: 2891:"? BLP stands for Biographies of Living Persons, and I fail to see how a request for adminship is a biography. What does it have to do with BLP? 3018:

Do I see articles like that one? NO! because like I said,people think they stink and delete them. Simple. Sorry if that sounded dumb or evil. --

1942:

Oh, by the way, how do you get a signature to sign your edits with? I mean, those stylish signatures with colours and multiple links and stuff.

3138:

Thank you for giving me the idea to help save trivia. My page has been deleted, and my Knowledge career is in the can. Cheers and good luck. --

347:

Interestingly, this user, a PR rep, was subsequently indefinitely blocked for posting this promotional article on behalf of a paying client. --

191: 89: 1998:

and argued as such and used as a basis for further editing on this policy. I do so as long these issues remain unresolved. Please discuss on

81: 76: 64: 59: 2952:" I hereby assert that I am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the Text (not the image(s)) contained in WORK 4241: 3604:

SineBot doesn't seem to like your sig for some reason - it's signing posts that you've already signed. I left a note on the bot talk page.

3181:

I did follow your link (apology accepted!) and it took me to an essay that does not have the force of policy. What I did was in line with

2220: 1300:

would carry out the block, this would insure that proper procedures are carried out, and insure that there is no COI in blocking the user.

1025:

already disclaimed this copyright in order to contribute to historical science. So, this screen capture is possible for anyone to use. --

1994:

standpoint and at any other time might be entirely appropriate, I must oppose it now as long as it may be construed as an enhancement of

2721:. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 2388: 1288:

and declined the request for unblocking the user. If you look at this user's edits in you will notice that he/she has had dealings with

746:

Interestingly, this user, a PR rep, was later indefinitely blocked for posting this promotional article on behalf of a paying client. --

1634:, and I strongly disagree with your suggestion that the images don't increase understanding. I have asked for review of the images on 4018: 3302: 3097: 1549:, the policy states that, "The use of non-free media in lists, galleries, discographies, and navigational and user-interface elements 2731:

I see that we disagree on the interpretation of A7. I'm glad that it seems we agree that VP is not the best place for deciding this.

2953: 2612: 1364: 4504: 2967:

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the image may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

2275:

seems to have been speedily deleted by you after automated messages from CorenSearchBot appeared on the page and on my talk page.

244:. Please advise on the next step (i.e., re-creating the page and hopefully preventing it from getting flagged and deleted again.) 4218: 3639: 3546:

The efforts I make to take your concerns seriously should be proportional to the efforts you make to offer serious explanations.

4495: 4462: 2537: 2283: 2278:

The article contained two very generic opening sentences that were largely (but not word-for-word) similar to two sentences from

1011: 971: 852: 2961:

I acknowledge that I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product, and to modify it according to their needs.

1582:

resolution requires us to keep nonfree images to a minimum, and this use of these images does not adhere to that requirement. --

3334: 1999: 4282:

I posted on the talk page of The Like Young image re: copyright issues. Let me know what you think. Thanks for your message. -

1413: 491:. And I did check each one, because I would have merely removed the copyvio sections if the entire article was not a problem. 4135: 3389: 2847: 2682: 2352:

Hi Bsf -- It was clear from a glance at your logs what you were doing -- clearing out the CSD queue. Unfortunately, you were

2259: 1671:

That doesn't relate to your understanding of the article. That relates to your understanding of a video on liveleak.com. --

3250:

Sorry, got the wrong person, someone else put notenglish on it, but I am just reassuring you that it will be English soon.

4198: 4168: 3004: 1763: 1752: 1388: 494:

Finally, I take no issue with the importance or notability of the subject. My only concern with this article relates to

3739: 259:

http://smd-www.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/source/sourceResult?criteria=PPARG&choice=Gene&option=Symbol&organism=Hs

2559: 2555: 1124: 1108:

I spent time filling in the info box also and finding an image. I wish people wouldn't keep removing articles like this

947: 593:

an administrator deleted this page since you started editing it. You might want to check the deletion log to see why."

3795: 2315: 2053: 870: 587:

When you deleted the article, I was on it already for an hour. Suddenly, the message popped out in my preview screen:

47: 17: 4311:

will be forthcoming? Can you intervene in any way to ensure this process is actually moving forward? Can you contact

3167:

Hi Butseriouslyfolks. Is there a succinct explanation of how to license flcikr images where you have a permission?

1986: 1864: 1766:. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in 1408: 1254: 38: 2372:

decent article on a professional groups -- it's not a question if it could be done, but of my own limitation.) --

1556:

and is thus unacceptable." (emphasis added.) Won't you please reconsider your decision in light of these facts? ←

1403: 1074:"asserting notability" and sorting out any copy issues you might not approve of. You didn't even give me a chance 2714: 2525: 2506: 2407:

or something similar, before a speedy deletion or even an AFD you might check Google Books, where you could find

2189: 1861: 1767: 1759: 1194: 3831:

I am not planning on revisting the edit-warring, I am afraid that the other editor is not of the same intention.

1398: 3385: 3347: 2216: 1163: 1149: 1128: 1109: 1094: 1075: 4183:

And thanks for reinstating article. I will of course heed your advice and address as soon as possible. Eddie

1090: 306: 3523:

You wrote, that you thought you didn't have to explain yourself because the reason(s) for your concerns were

2518: 2137:

says pretty clearly that it's not a social networking site. And yet, I fit in better here than anywhere else.

1348:

Thanks for your note and support, Butseriouslyfolks. However you may be barking up the wrong tree. Consider:

1293: 1285: 3695: 3657: 3608: 3306: 3266: 2665: 1989:. I did so because the NFCC is seriously flawed, and some editors have taken an extremist interpretation of 1393: 3835: 2412: 2272: 1537:

Would they be able to without the gallery, or if the logos were interspersed or in their own articles? No.

141:. My goal by making the disambiguation link and page was to avoid confusion between the two applications. 4014: 3204: 3190: 3093: 2287: 2049: 846: 548:

You are correct of course that I have no idea what future edits might have done to the article. However,

487:

Also, I don't know why you had to use a dozen pages from the website; I found every fact you repeated on

4053: 3988: 3977: 3366: 2212: 1884: 1868: 4257: 4098: 3834:

I am also struck by the similarities between the edits and editing behavior of this editor and another,

3692: 3654: 3605: 3221: 2608: 1370: 1247: 4546: 4316: 4083: 4076: 4068: 4035: 4010: 3762:

All right, thanks for your help and explanations. I don't agree with it, but I'll play by the rules. --

2837: 261:) pulled their information from a public database. You can see the source of their information here: 4268: 3871: 2621: 2604: 4491: 4483: 4458: 4450: 4186: 4156: 4006: 3783: 3727: 3625: 3381: 3322: 3298: 3085: 2670: 2600: 2541: 2247: 2208: 2180: 2045: 2042:

possible, and place the article back on the public domain as soon as you can. 15:02 , 2 August 2007

1093:

and gave me a chance to make it acceptable. I'm really trying hard to fill in gaps in knowledge here

1007: 967: 842: 724: 668: 602: 533: 454: 387: 187: 3115:

Is there really an orange banner that says, "I've got mail? I love mail!" I saw it on a talk page --

218: 146: 4315:

as I previously requested of you (the Publisher/Manager is expecting such a query from Knowledge)?

3673: 3621: 3330: 2983: 2970: 2859: 2251: 1680: 1630:

rejecting this obvious example of fair use and damaging the quality of the encyclopedia because of

1591: 1496: 1439: 1268: 1049: 856: 755: 695: 638: 566: 507: 426: 356: 156: 103: 4190: 4160: 3074: 1239: 4531: 4518: 4132: 2954:

http://www.shaolinwingchun.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=32&Itemid=46

2900: 2818: 2678: 2654: 2483: 2474: 2464: 2444: 2433: 2255: 2176: 2155: 2121: 2100: 2080: 1960: 1875:

page, you'd see that he is "tamagawaboat", as his original tamagawaboat youtube account has been

1148:

address the problem. All the best (i'm glad you like my signature - things need livening up huh?

931: 905: 885: 131: 4283: 3808: 3787: 4549: 4534: 4521: 4435: 4425: 4415: 4401: 4387: 4373: 4363: 4348: 4333: 4319: 4300: 4286: 4202: 4172: 4139: 4115: 4101: 4086: 4056: 4038: 4022: 3991: 3980: 3962: 3940: 3920: 3893: 3882: 3853: 3811: 3799: 3766: 3757: 3743: 3719: 3697: 3686: 3659: 3647: 3610: 3592: 3578: 3574:

I'm not sure if Jun Matsubara (the author of the pictures) is eligible to keep that copyright.

3550: 3497: 3445: 3397: 3369: 3350: 3317:

Ok, ty for the advice. Please sign the petition to save trivia once i create it. Yay Trivia! --

3283: 3269: 3254: 3244: 3224: 3207: 3193: 3171: 3157: 3142: 3128: 3119: 3105: 3049: 3040: 3031: 3022: 3008: 2986: 2973: 2904: 2872: 2840: 2825: 2797: 2785: 2769: 2752: 2735: 2725: 2708: 2686: 2638: 2624: 2582: 2569: 2544: 2486: 2477: 2467: 2447: 2436: 2418: 2391: 2376: 2361: 2346: 2332: 2304: 2290: 2232: 2200: 2183: 2162: 2128: 2107: 2087: 2061: 2031: 2006: 1967: 1946: 1925: 1901: 1843: 1830: 1820: 1811: 1796: 1780: 1731: 1693: 1642: 1604: 1560: 1509: 1465: 1452: 1423: 1373: 1342: 1327: 1309: 1271: 1256: 1231: 1219: 1201: 1172: 1158: 1137: 1118: 1103: 1084: 1062: 1029: 1016: 987: 976: 937: 911: 891: 859: 824: 800: 768: 731: 708: 675: 651: 609: 579: 540: 520: 488: 461: 439: 394: 369: 332: 317: 295: 284: 270: 248: 221: 149: 116: 4232: 4194: 4164: 3846: 3667: 3214: 3200: 3186: 3102: 3089: 3001: 2853: 2794: 2782: 2777:

Wanted to let you know that I've re-created a more substantial, though still short, entry for

2705: 2579: 2566: 1674: 1631: 1585: 1546: 1490: 1433: 1353: 1043: 749: 689: 632: 560: 501: 420: 350: 4527:Ï thought so indeed after reading your most recent edit summary there. :) I will finish it. 4378:

You're "sorry" I'm having a bad experience, but you'll take my heartfelt frustration and go

4262: 3735: 3636:, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button 3632:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the 3575: 3251: 3241: 2704:

at the Village Pump as I thought you might want to have a say with respect to the question.

2701: 1367: 1315: 1297: 1289: 1278: 869:

First of all, I'm the editor who was reverted four times, resulting in Jmfangio's block for

267: 3493:

I strongly encourage you to make more of an effort to be collegial, and explain yourself.

2092:

Hey, thanks, man! I just welcomed somebody for the first time ever, and I really liked it!

1860:

is a jap right wing apologist site, with ludicrous claims like japan fought nazis in china

957:

is in the public domain, but that picture is not a capture of that film. The picture is a

242:

Knowledge:WikiProject_Molecular_and_Cellular_Biology/Proposals#Proposal_from_Novartis.2FGNF

4487: 4454: 4407:

don't know how this work, a massive undertaking, satisfies you. Because YouTube is doing

4345: 3791: 3168: 2976:

Shaolin Wing Chun Federation Administrator & COPYRIGHT HOLDER www.shaolinwingchun.com

2003: 1898: 1827: 1817: 1808: 1728: 1639: 1557: 1462: 1420: 1002: 984: 962: 958: 817: 793: 719: 663: 597: 528: 449: 382: 292: 281: 4080: 4330: 4112: 3900: 3889: 3823:

As you were the admin who denied my request for an unblock arising from an edit war in

3532: 3513: 3326: 3318: 3280: 3139: 3125: 3116: 3046: 3037: 3028: 3019: 2635: 2353: 2318: 1995: 1990: 1840: 1527: 1360: 473: 314: 245: 2945:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Grand_Master_Nam_Anh

2887:

removal of inappropriate comments, I have to wonder: how can you call it a "delet per

2147:

if I'm working on anti-vandalism, deletion, or other stuff, I might well consider it.

4528: 4515: 4511: 4432: 4422: 4412: 4398: 4384: 4370: 4360: 4215: 4127: 3824: 3589: 3547: 3494: 3472: 3442: 3429: 3237: 3230: 2893: 2888: 2811: 2765: 2749: 2732: 2722: 2674: 2454: 2430: 2367:

You're right, the article sucks -- but the problem is that the subgroups of the IEEE

2301: 2229: 2197: 2148: 2134: 2114: 2093: 2073: 1953: 1943: 1922: 1789: 1773: 1635: 1484: 1480: 1198: 1190: 926: 900: 880: 554: 549: 477: 113: 3588:

Thanks for your work fixing the URLs. It's always great to meet such kind people. --

3063: 2429:

I felt that way, too, which is why I barged in. ^^; Good luck with the wackiness. --

2338:

Woops, this has been fix while my internet connection was playing up. the redirect

4297: 4003:

surprised that you deleted without checking with ADKSportFitness or with myself.

3956: 3951: 3934: 3929: 3914: 3909: 3878: 3839: 3644: 3598: 3411: 2997: 2778: 2718: 2576: 2563: 2404: 2373: 2358: 1334: 1319: 1301: 1246:

logs. The name was immediately familiar and I blocked it without a second thought.

1144: 838: 780: 329: 3182: 102:

I contacted Imre Solt, but I am not sure that his response will be decent. Go to

4079:

14:24, 18 September 2007 (UTC) The Publisher/Manager exact contact info is here:

3124:

It would be funny if there was one that said, "Mail, not another one!" Cheers. --

4476: 4252: 3763: 3754: 3731: 3716: 3438:

I know we have interacted before. Forgive me. I can't remember where or when.

2660: 2415: 2399: 2343: 2329: 1880: 1807:

If I agree to make stubs for each of the groups, will you undelete the images? ←

1026: 625: 621: 495: 480:

determined that some phrases were copied while others were "slightly rewritten".

404: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3070: 3056: 1872: 1534:

Would users be able to identify groups from their logos with the gallery? Yes.

3867: 3562: 3154: 2342:

is still deleted and I would appreciate it if someone would fix that as well.

1856:

edit, as tamagawaboat is the guy who made the nanking video from youtube. His

811: 787: 135: 2928:

May I resubmit the Grand Master Nam Anh article or will it be again deleted?

1182: 4049: 3691:

I don't know why I find this so amusing, but I've been laughing my ass off.

3633: 3516:, and your perception that it didn't was due to a bias in your perceptions. 3362: 1215: 3561:

Similar material exists on the web site of Sir Nicholas Slannings regiment

3265:

I have replied to your query on my talk page. Look forward to your reply.--

2387:

Whats the rationale for deleting an article with over 50 incoming links? --

961:, and only the lower right hand corner of that image comes from the film. 3566:

being duplicated / triplicated.Pan narrans 17:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

3294: 3987:

So, if I, as creator and uploader, remove the tag, will they be deleted?

3418: 2760: 2028: 4075:

as the Publisher/Manager of that enterprise is anticipating your query.

3638: 2938: 2634:

Thank you for wishing me good luck. It's ok if you dont want to sign --

3866:

14:39, September 16, 2007 Butseriouslyfolks (Talk | contribs) deleted "

1972:

Do I still need a signature here if there's one already in the message?

1887:

and Tamagawaboat, based on his user page edit and a serious of reverts

3236:

Hi there, I noticed you put a {{NotEnglish}} tag on the newly-created

1227: 2339: 2321: 1857: 2575:

Thanks. That helped with my decision to delete the images. -Regards

291:

bring down the size of the reference list to a more practical size.

139: 3872:

http://passionforcinema.com/unlocking-the-mystery-called-gajraj-rao

3483:

Note: I tried to be tactful, and not make you sound like a villain.

4312: 4072: 3629: 254: 232: 4214:

head-up (at least I saw it this way). Cheers and happy editing.

2279: 169:

information in my own words, which made the copyright bot happy.

104:

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=503681&page=9

4071:

12:35, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Please also consider contacting

3075:

http://leusd.info/bes/Copyright/GNUFreeDocumentationLicense.htm

2328:

and this article can be merged if there are notability issues.

1225:

Hee hee, just thought I'd let you know that you made me smile

997:

are free. But that picture is not just a screen capture from

309:

that doesnt point to an article. Based opn your response I'll

126:

Could you explain why you deleted the article on PowerShell?

25: 4250:

Ahoy, me hearty! How 'bout a good ol' jug o' grog? RegARRds,

3451:

My memory of our previous interactions are coming back to me.

2700:

Just wanted to let you know that I've raised the question of

2657:(it's already FA-status but it's struggling to stay that way) 1483:

and there were being persistently reinserted in violation of

3620:

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to

2324:. There is no CSD for "notability not asserted"; there was 1189:

OK- I get it now. Sorry. No copy and paste this time. --

3624:

and Knowledge pages that have open discussion, you should

2958:

I agree to publish that work under the free GFDL license.

257:. The copyrighted page that the bot flag was based upon ( 2228:

Hi, what form should such permission have taken? Cheers,

953:

About your declining to speedy delete the picture - yes,

110:

I really appreciate all your help. Thank you very much.

4475:

Please use the discussion tab to discuss any reason why

4209:

Concerning the Where's an egg article...re your message

3465: 3457: 3432:

means I convinced you, and that I can remove that tag.

3422: 2944: 2884: 1894: 1891: 1888: 1854: 1357: 1355: 1351: 1349: 277: 3531:

when someone else bring instances of your lapses from

3428:

I am not going to assume that your lack of a reply on

3036:

I removed a warning? Or are you just bugging me? :0 --

2937:

Following your advice, in regards to deleted article:

4081:

http://www.adksportsfitness.com/contact_us/index.html

3064:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Butterfield_Elementary_School

4048:

Hello again. This is an example of my family trees:

2517:

Could I have you take a look at this other article,

3341:

Thomas-Institut Page, deleted copyright "violation"

3279:

I will watch the 3rr. Did I break it by the way? --

1333:Be my guest - just keep my IP address to yourself. 188:"Articles not satisfying the notability guidelines" 155:In regards to your reply to the above comment (see 2594:let me know via my talk page, I guess. Thanks! 238:Knowledge:Bots/Requests for approval/ProteinBoxBot 2482:An even better solution is to switch to Firefox! 718:Thanks, an sorry if I offended you in any way. -- 4208: 3297:or email me snambi at gmail dot com —Preceding 253:I'm also involved in the project for this page, 3462:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 2177:User talk:Howcheng#Image:Dr RA Dyer image02.jpg 1867:came back as "possible". However, if you go to 1554:fails the test for significance (criterion #8), 305:Can I ask what is the point of having an image 4329:Im retireing, now. Goodbye and best wishes. -- 2013:William Poole (Federal Reserve Bank president) 4505:Knowledge:Possibly unfree images/2007 July 24 2300:Please stop deleting pages out of process. `' 1978:Reversion of your edit to WP:Non-Free content 1363:was engaging in mischief and self-promotion. 837:Hi. There's a discussion of some of this at 8: 4359:I was still working on that, quickdraw. -- 3071:http://leusd.info/bes/BESHistory/History.htm 3057:http://leusd.info/bes/BESHistory/History.htm 2939:http://en.wikipedia.org/Grand_Master_Nam_Anh 2284:European Universities Debating Championship‎ 4242:Happy International Talk Like a Pirate Day! 3563:http://www.slannings.org/CrucibleGun01.html 2996:Thanks for dropping the cow on that one. / 1786:I gotta fix that dang DRVNote template. -- 1540:Would they be able to with text alone? No. 1185:-- 20:46, 18 August 2007 Butseriouslyfolks 2538:Knowledge:Possibly unfree images#Log pages 1183:http://wiki.debian.org/DebianWikiIsNotGFDL 808:Worry not - article was userfied! Cheers. 313:it but I thought I'd run it by you first, 3363:http://www.egsamp.uni-koeln.de/theegsamp/ 2597:Thanks for the update - I'll pass it on! 2025:that being used for most U.S. Congressmen 1414:Image:Salah al-Din al-Ayoubi Brigades.jpg 240:and with the support of the WP:MCB group 4148:cleft association article deleted - why? 2910:deletion of Grand Master Nam Anh article 3295:http://sourceforge.net/projects/emarket 1547:WP:NONFREE#Examples of unacceptable use 1380:Deletion of Iraqi insurgent group logos 4230: 1193:03:43, 20 August 2007 (UTC) (context: 924:it expired. Oh, the perils of life. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4510:Hi, I saw you removed this page from 2949:I would like to state the following: 1764:Image:Asayab al-Iraq al-Jihadiyah.jpg 1753:Image:Asayab al-Iraq al-Jihadiyah.jpg 1389:Image:Asayab al-Iraq al-Jihadiyah.jpg 7: 3079:also was emailed on/around Aug. 31 2540:? There is a huge backlog. :-( -- 2072:Where d'you find welcome templates? 4394:thought I wouldn't have a problem?! 3082:Anything else I ned to do? Thanks 2310:IEEE Communications Society speedie 1985:I reverted your recent edit to the 2560:Image:The_Buttle_of_the_China2.jpg 2556:Image:Trimedfilm_battleofchina.jpg 1883:is very likely the same person as 1787: 1771: 1040:Funniest thing I've read today! -- 948:Image:The Buttle of the China2.jpg 24: 3818:Pop goes the weasel words...again 1284:I notice that you has a look at 1125:User:Ernst Stavro Blofeld/Sandbox 4344:actual discussion on that page. 4231: 3637: 3069:Release has been added to: to 2271:A stub article I created on the 1226: 1214: 1164: 1150: 1129: 1110: 1095: 1089:I would be cool if you restored 1076: 29: 4313:http://www.ADKSportsFitness.com 4073:http://www.adksportsfitness.com 3464:about a technical problem with 3337:) 20:59, August 30, 2007 (UTC) 3309:) 01:20, August 27, 2007 (UTC) 3100:) 21:35, 5 September 2007 (UTC) 2819: 2156: 2122: 2101: 2081: 2018:Hi, I changed your edit to the 2000:Wikipedia_talk:Non-free_content 1961: 1921:folks. I mean, really, people. 1336: 1321: 1303: 1213:Schnitzengruben... ~*Snicker*~ 737:Critical Test Result Management 338:Critical Test Result Management 236:the context of a bot trial run 4550:19:01, 24 September 2007 (UTC) 4535:18:02, 23 September 2007 (UTC) 4522:17:57, 23 September 2007 (UTC) 4436:01:53, 23 September 2007 (UTC) 4426:01:20, 23 September 2007 (UTC) 4416:00:55, 23 September 2007 (UTC) 4402:00:30, 23 September 2007 (UTC) 4388:00:06, 23 September 2007 (UTC) 4374:23:02, 22 September 2007 (UTC) 4364:22:51, 22 September 2007 (UTC) 4349:08:07, 22 September 2007 (UTC) 4334:22:47, 20 September 2007 (UTC) 4320:18:08, 20 September 2007 (UTC) 4301:17:39, 20 September 2007 (UTC) 4287:17:09, 19 September 2007 (UTC) 4269:16:01, 19 September 2007 (UTC) 4219:15:07, 19 September 2007 (UTC) 4203:00:10, 19 September 2007 (UTC) 4173:22:40, 18 September 2007 (UTC) 4140:22:38, 18 September 2007 (UTC) 4116:20:39, 18 September 2007 (UTC) 4102:17:16, 18 September 2007 (UTC) 4087:14:38, 18 September 2007 (UTC) 4057:01:20, 18 September 2007 (UTC) 4039:22:45, 17 September 2007 (UTC) 4023:22:11, 17 September 2007 (UTC) 3992:07:24, 17 September 2007 (UTC) 3981:23:54, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 3963:22:30, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 3941:22:24, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 3921:22:19, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 3894:19:21, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 3883:19:00, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 3864:Than they re-create! Hee hee, 3854:15:40, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 3812:02:39, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 3800:02:28, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 3767:16:56, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 3758:16:27, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 3744:16:07, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 3720:16:02, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 3698:02:23, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 3687:02:15, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 3660:02:12, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 3653:Yeah, sign your posts, loser! 3648:02:09, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 3611:02:01, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 3593:01:31, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 3579:04:37, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3551:00:43, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 3498:14:39, 11 September 2007 (UTC) 3425:. Were you aware of my reply? 3398:13:21, 11 September 2007 (UTC) 3284:20:12, 10 September 2007 (UTC) 3270:15:55, 10 September 2007 (UTC) 2931:Here is my release statement: 2812: 2615:) 23:56, August 27, 2007 (UTC) 2389:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 2262:) 23:58, August 25, 2007 (UTC) 2223:) 22:47, August 25, 2007 (UTC) 2149: 2115: 2113:Wat about warnning templates? 2094: 2074: 1954: 1409:Image:Jaish Al Naqshbandia.jpg 1069:But seriously you need a punch 1035:But seriously you need a punch 841:, also some discussion on the 1: 4111:Hey thanks for doing that. -- 3680: 3674: 3668: 3446:14:47, 9 September 2007 (UTC) 3375:Placed GFDL notice on webpage 3370:20:05, 6 September 2007 (UTC) 3351:13:50, 6 September 2007 (UTC) 3255:23:15, 8 September 2007 (UTC) 3245:23:10, 8 September 2007 (UTC) 3225:18:03, 8 September 2007 (UTC) 3208:17:26, 8 September 2007 (UTC) 3194:17:07, 8 September 2007 (UTC) 3172:15:59, 7 September 2007 (UTC) 3158:15:43, 7 September 2007 (UTC) 3143:19:44, 6 September 2007 (UTC) 3129:21:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC) 3120:21:41, 5 September 2007 (UTC) 3106:21:39, 5 September 2007 (UTC) 3055:Copyright release added to 3050:21:31, 4 September 2007 (UTC) 3041:21:31, 4 September 2007 (UTC) 3032:21:29, 4 September 2007 (UTC) 3023:21:24, 4 September 2007 (UTC) 3009:05:33, 4 September 2007 (UTC) 2987:19:29, 2 September 2007 (UTC) 2974:19:29, 2 September 2007 (UTC) 2905:18:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC) 2873:14:21, 1 September 2007 (UTC) 2866: 2860: 2854: 2841:05:31, 1 September 2007 (UTC) 2798:04:29, 2 September 2007 (UTC) 2786:23:29, 1 September 2007 (UTC) 2280:http://www.debating.de/node/9 1952:Thanks, man! Check this out-- 1687: 1681: 1675: 1598: 1592: 1586: 1503: 1497: 1491: 1446: 1440: 1434: 1404:Image:Jaish al-Mujahideen.jpg 1056: 1050: 1044: 932: 906: 886: 762: 756: 750: 702: 696: 690: 645: 639: 633: 573: 567: 561: 514: 508: 502: 476:. Another admin who patrols 433: 427: 421: 363: 357: 351: 266:much time at all). Thanks. 3289:Re: eMarket Trading Platform 2190:Image:Dr RA Dyer image02.jpg 1790: 1774: 1292:, the very user who blocked 192:criteria for speedy deletion 2826:20:56, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 2770:15:17, 30 August 2007 (UTC) 2753:03:30, 30 August 2007 (UTC) 2736:02:51, 30 August 2007 (UTC) 2726:02:22, 30 August 2007 (UTC) 2709:21:50, 29 August 2007 (UTC) 2687:07:10, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 2639:21:18, 30 August 2007 (UTC) 2625:20:34, 30 August 2007 (UTC) 2583:17:35, 28 August 2007 (UTC) 2570:15:12, 28 August 2007 (UTC) 2545:15:37, 27 August 2007 (UTC) 2487:16:21, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 2478:16:18, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 2468:15:32, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 2448:06:28, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 2437:06:11, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 2419:12:33, 27 August 2007 (UTC) 2392:02:48, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 2377:06:35, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 2362:06:00, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 2347:04:44, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 2333:04:42, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 2316:IEEE Communications Society 2305:04:35, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 2291:01:43, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 2233:08:38, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 2201:22:44, 25 August 2007 (UTC) 2184:18:07, 25 August 2007 (UTC) 2163:11:08, 25 August 2007 (UTC) 2129:03:06, 25 August 2007 (UTC) 2108:02:59, 25 August 2007 (UTC) 2088:02:50, 25 August 2007 (UTC) 2062:17:00, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 2032:03:38, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 2007:19:19, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 1968:05:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 1947:05:15, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 1926:05:09, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 1902:04:20, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 1844:16:37, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 1831:16:38, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 1821:16:33, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 1812:16:17, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 1797:15:31, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 1781:15:27, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 1732:15:49, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 1694:15:46, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 1643:15:25, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 1605:15:16, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 1561:15:05, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 1510:15:00, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 1466:14:55, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 1453:14:49, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 1424:14:32, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 1399:Image:Jaish al-Fatiheen.JPG 1374:16:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 1343:13:23, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 1328:11:06, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 1310:02:49, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 1272:22:33, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 1257:17:59, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 1232:05:49, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 1220:05:46, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 1202:19:24, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 1173:21:22, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 1159:21:17, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 1138:21:09, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 1119:21:07, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 1104:21:05, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 1085:21:02, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 1063:21:01, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 1030:20:37, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 1017:15:23, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 988:10:37, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 977:08:19, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 938:06:52, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 912:06:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 892:06:36, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 860:02:01, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 825:10:56, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 801:08:18, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 769:07:39, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 732:07:46, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 709:07:29, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 676:07:23, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 652:07:08, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 610:06:56, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 580:06:18, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 541:05:38, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 521:04:48, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 462:04:18, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 440:03:48, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 395:03:41, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 370:07:38, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 333:07:36, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 318:01:50, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 296:22:59, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 285:20:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 271:19:18, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 249:16:00, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 222:04:44, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 150:06:32, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 117:21:07, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 18:User talk:Butseriouslyfolks 4565: 4092:Email re: Barbara McMartin 3860:No sooner do you delete... 3073:and connecting page: to 2846:Wow, I never even touched 2713:An editor has asked for a 2239:Shortailed albatross image 1987:Knowledge:Non-free content 1758:An editor has asked for a 1127:so I can write it and try 122:PowerShell Article Deleted 98:Is this a decent approval? 4237: 3664:That bot is goin down! -- 1915:, folks. No, no. I mean, 1195:Debian Multimedia Project 307:Image:Climate Camp 03.jpg 3708:Revised Standard Version 3570:"Image:1188676595852.jpg 2934:To whom it may concern, 2914:To whom it may concern, 1091:Nasaan Ng Kailangan Kita 4179:thanks for prompt reply 3356:Restored, further steps 2666:Super Smash Bros. Melee 2519:Digital Media Institute 1394:Image:Hamas of iraq.jpg 1294:User talk:WillNotBeBack 1286:User talk:WillNotBeBack 4441:Possibly unfree images 2883:While I fully endorse 1528:significance criterion 833:User:Fildelfair issues 779:Hiya BSF. I've tagged 775:Once again bugging you 4479:needs to be deleted. 3836:User:OperationSpooner 3527:. That is nonsense. 3466:your recent placement 2528:1:54, 17 August 2007 2499:Mission Statement NOC 2273:Berlin Debating Union 2267:Berlin Debating Union 2037:USHMM Article Deleted 1865:request for checkuser 1526:On the contrary, the 42:of past discussions. 4358:<grits teeth: --> 4223: 4121:my war aginst demons 3775:Re: Ultrastar Deluxe 3386:Philipp Steinkrueger 3348:Philipp Steinkrueger 3163:Vermont Senate image 2702:Notability re Agents 2696:Notability re Agents 2513:Tell me if I am Okay 2509:3:43 16 August 2007 2175:Could you check out 1632:m:Copyright paranoia 1167:♦ Hairless Blofeld ♦ 4292:Medford airport pic 3535:to your attention. 2992:User talk:Alien joe 2554:When you nominated 2550:Images for deletion 2532:If you have time... 1885:User:MUSASHIKOGANEI 1869:User:MUSASHIKOGANEI 1803:Compromise proposal 1768:the deletion review 1531:similar function." 999:The Battle of China 995:The Battle of China 955:The Battle of China 227:Deletetion of PPARG 4267: 2879:Deleted per WP:BLP 2655:Aspergers Syndrome 2326:20+ incoming links 1250:¤~Persian Poet Gal 132:Windows PowerShell 4500: 4486:comment added by 4467: 4453:comment added by 4275: 4274: 4251: 4205: 4189:comment added by 4175: 4159:comment added by 4138: 4044:Question (part 2) 4025: 4009:comment added by 3851: 3802: 3786:comment added by 3746: 3730:comment added by 3616:Your recent edits 3556:Nicholas Slanning 3384:comment added by 3325:comment added by 3301:comment added by 3267:PersonalityPhotos 3261:User Name Concern 3215:9 Parts of Desire 3101: 3088:comment added by 3007: 2689: 2673:comment added by 2616: 2603:comment added by 2589:Omnicell deletion 2288:Purple Watermelon 2263: 2250:comment added by 2224: 2211:comment added by 2064: 2050:Butseriouslyfolks 2048:comment added by 1973: 1359:My guess is that 1178:Debian wiki paste 1015: 975: 936: 910: 890: 823: 799: 729: 673: 607: 538: 459: 392: 95: 94: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 4556: 4541:Barbara McMartin 4499: 4480: 4466: 4447: 4306:Barbara McMartin 4265: 4260: 4255: 4235: 4228: 4227: 4184: 4154: 4131: 4062:Barbara McMartin 4029:Barbara McMartin 4004: 3998:Barbara McMartin 3959: 3954: 3937: 3932: 3917: 3912: 3870:" ‎ (copyvio of 3850: 3847: 3844: 3781: 3725: 3684: 3682: 3676: 3670: 3641: 3477: 3471: 3416: 3410: 3222:The Evil Spartan 3083: 3000: 2896: 2870: 2868: 2862: 2856: 2823: 2816: 2668: 2598: 2245: 2206: 2160: 2153: 2126: 2119: 2105: 2098: 2085: 2078: 2068:Welcome tempates 2043: 1971: 1965: 1958: 1935:love my cheese. 1795: 1792: 1779: 1776: 1691: 1689: 1683: 1677: 1602: 1600: 1594: 1588: 1507: 1505: 1499: 1493: 1450: 1448: 1442: 1436: 1340: 1338: 1325: 1323: 1307: 1305: 1290:User:Will Beback 1279:User:Will Beback 1262:Stop Interfering 1230: 1218: 1170: 1156: 1135: 1116: 1101: 1082: 1060: 1058: 1052: 1046: 1005: 965: 934: 930: 908: 904: 888: 884: 822: 820: 809: 798: 796: 785: 766: 764: 758: 752: 728: 725: 706: 704: 698: 692: 672: 669: 649: 647: 641: 635: 606: 603: 577: 575: 569: 563: 537: 534: 518: 516: 510: 504: 458: 455: 437: 435: 429: 423: 391: 388: 376:Kościuszko Mound 367: 365: 359: 353: 280:. All the best, 73: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4564: 4563: 4559: 4558: 4557: 4555: 4554: 4553: 4543: 4508: 4481: 4473: 4448: 4443: 4356: 4354:Tomo Yasuda.jpg 4341: 4327: 4308: 4294: 4280: 4263: 4258: 4253: 4226: 4211: 4181: 4150: 4123: 4109: 4094: 4064: 4046: 4031: 4000: 3973: 3957: 3952: 3935: 3930: 3915: 3910: 3904: 3862: 3848: 3840: 3820: 3777: 3710: 3666: 3628:by typing four 3626:sign your posts 3618: 3602: 3586: 3572: 3558: 3506: 3475: 3469: 3414: 3408: 3405: 3377: 3358: 3343: 3315: 3291: 3277: 3263: 3234: 3218: 3183:official policy 3179: 3165: 3150: 3136: 3113: 3060: 3016: 2994: 2912: 2894: 2881: 2852: 2833: 2808: 2715:deletion review 2698: 2646: 2632: 2591: 2552: 2534: 2526:DarknessFalls13 2515: 2507:DarknessFalls13 2501: 2427: 2385: 2344:John Vandenberg 2330:John Vandenberg 2314:Please restore 2312: 2298: 2269: 2241: 2193: 2173: 2070: 2039: 2016: 1980: 1909: 1851: 1849:battle of china 1838: 1805: 1760:deletion review 1756: 1673: 1584: 1489: 1432: 1382: 1335: 1320: 1302: 1282: 1264: 1243: 1211: 1180: 1153:♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ 1132:♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ 1113:♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ 1098:♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ 1079:♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ 1071: 1042: 1037: 959:derivative work 951: 867: 835: 818: 810: 794: 786: 777: 748: 739: 726: 688: 670: 631: 604: 559: 535: 500: 456: 419: 389: 378: 349: 340: 325: 303: 301:Policeman image 229: 124: 100: 69: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4562: 4560: 4542: 4539: 4538: 4537: 4507: 4502: 4472: 4469: 4442: 4439: 4355: 4352: 4340: 4337: 4326: 4323: 4307: 4304: 4293: 4290: 4279: 4278:The Like Young 4276: 4273: 4272: 4246: 4245: 4238: 4236: 4225: 4222: 4210: 4207: 4180: 4177: 4149: 4146: 4144: 4122: 4119: 4108: 4105: 4093: 4090: 4063: 4060: 4045: 4042: 4030: 4027: 3999: 3996: 3995: 3994: 3972: 3969: 3968: 3967: 3966: 3965: 3944: 3943: 3903: 3901:Gardiner Means 3898: 3897: 3896: 3892:adds flavor! 3861: 3858: 3857: 3856: 3832: 3828: 3819: 3816: 3805: 3776: 3773: 3771: 3709: 3706: 3705: 3704: 3703: 3702: 3701: 3700: 3617: 3614: 3601: 3596: 3585: 3582: 3571: 3568: 3557: 3554: 3505: 3502: 3501: 3500: 3490: 3489: 3485: 3484: 3480: 3479: 3453: 3452: 3404: 3401: 3376: 3373: 3367:81.173.234.114 3357: 3354: 3342: 3339: 3314: 3311: 3290: 3287: 3276: 3273: 3262: 3259: 3258: 3257: 3233: 3228: 3217: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3178: 3177:NOR protection 3175: 3164: 3161: 3149: 3146: 3135: 3132: 3112: 3109: 3068: 3059: 3053: 3045:OK, thanks. -- 3015: 3012: 2993: 2990: 2979: 2943:deletion log: 2911: 2908: 2880: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2832: 2829: 2807: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2755: 2739: 2738: 2697: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2663: 2658: 2645: 2642: 2631: 2628: 2590: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2551: 2548: 2536:could look at 2533: 2530: 2524: 2522: 2514: 2511: 2505: 2500: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2426: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2384: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2350: 2349: 2311: 2308: 2297: 2294: 2268: 2265: 2240: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2213:Abracadabra420 2192: 2187: 2172: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2069: 2066: 2038: 2035: 2015: 2010: 1979: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1908: 1905: 1850: 1847: 1837: 1834: 1804: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1755: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1538: 1535: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1456: 1455: 1417: 1416: 1411: 1406: 1401: 1396: 1391: 1381: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1361:user:Sahajhist 1332: 1281: 1275: 1269:Randomfrenchie 1263: 1260: 1242: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1210: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1179: 1176: 1070: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1036: 1033: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1019: 950: 944: 943: 942: 941: 940: 915: 914: 866: 865:Jmfangio block 863: 834: 831: 830: 829: 828: 827: 776: 773: 772: 771: 738: 735: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 659: 658: 657: 656: 655: 654: 594: 588: 585: 584: 583: 582: 524: 523: 492: 485: 484: 483: 482: 481: 474:User:HermesBot 445: 444: 443: 442: 411: 410: 409: 408: 377: 374: 373: 372: 339: 336: 324: 321: 302: 299: 288: 287: 228: 225: 216: 215: 212: 208: 207: 202: 201: 196: 195: 182: 181: 177: 176: 171: 170: 165: 164: 160: 123: 120: 99: 96: 93: 92: 87: 84: 79: 74: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4561: 4552: 4551: 4548: 4540: 4536: 4533: 4530: 4526: 4525: 4524: 4523: 4520: 4517: 4513: 4506: 4503: 4501: 4497: 4493: 4489: 4485: 4478: 4470: 4468: 4464: 4460: 4456: 4452: 4440: 4438: 4437: 4434: 4428: 4427: 4424: 4418: 4417: 4414: 4410: 4404: 4403: 4400: 4395: 4390: 4389: 4386: 4381: 4376: 4375: 4372: 4366: 4365: 4362: 4353: 4351: 4350: 4347: 4338: 4336: 4335: 4332: 4324: 4322: 4321: 4318: 4314: 4305: 4303: 4302: 4299: 4291: 4289: 4288: 4285: 4277: 4271: 4270: 4266: 4261: 4256: 4248: 4247: 4244: 4243: 4239: 4234: 4229: 4224:Walk t'plank! 4221: 4220: 4217: 4206: 4204: 4200: 4196: 4192: 4188: 4178: 4176: 4174: 4170: 4166: 4162: 4158: 4147: 4145: 4142: 4141: 4137: 4134: 4130: 4129: 4120: 4118: 4117: 4114: 4106: 4104: 4103: 4100: 4099:74.33.195.245 4091: 4089: 4088: 4085: 4082: 4078: 4074: 4070: 4061: 4059: 4058: 4055: 4051: 4043: 4041: 4040: 4037: 4028: 4026: 4024: 4020: 4016: 4012: 4008: 3997: 3993: 3990: 3985: 3984: 3983: 3982: 3979: 3970: 3964: 3961: 3960: 3955: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3945: 3942: 3939: 3938: 3933: 3925: 3924: 3923: 3922: 3919: 3918: 3913: 3902: 3899: 3895: 3891: 3887: 3886: 3885: 3884: 3880: 3875: 3873: 3869: 3859: 3855: 3852: 3845: 3843: 3837: 3833: 3829: 3826: 3825:Ronald Reagan 3822: 3821: 3817: 3815: 3813: 3810: 3803: 3801: 3797: 3793: 3789: 3785: 3774: 3772: 3769: 3768: 3765: 3760: 3759: 3756: 3751: 3747: 3745: 3741: 3737: 3733: 3729: 3722: 3721: 3718: 3713: 3707: 3699: 3696: 3694: 3693:Videmus Omnia 3690: 3689: 3688: 3685: 3683: 3677: 3671: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3658: 3656: 3655:Videmus Omnia 3652: 3651: 3650: 3649: 3646: 3640: 3635: 3631: 3627: 3623: 3615: 3613: 3612: 3609: 3607: 3606:Videmus Omnia 3600: 3597: 3595: 3594: 3591: 3583: 3581: 3580: 3577: 3569: 3567: 3564: 3555: 3553: 3552: 3549: 3544: 3540: 3536: 3534: 3528: 3526: 3521: 3517: 3515: 3509: 3503: 3499: 3496: 3492: 3491: 3487: 3486: 3482: 3481: 3474: 3467: 3463: 3459: 3455: 3454: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3447: 3444: 3439: 3436: 3433: 3431: 3430:Talk:Sada Jan 3426: 3424: 3420: 3413: 3407:You placed a 3402: 3400: 3399: 3395: 3391: 3387: 3383: 3374: 3372: 3371: 3368: 3364: 3355: 3353: 3352: 3349: 3340: 3338: 3336: 3332: 3328: 3324: 3320: 3312: 3310: 3308: 3304: 3300: 3296: 3288: 3286: 3285: 3282: 3274: 3272: 3271: 3268: 3260: 3256: 3253: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3246: 3243: 3239: 3238:Edmund Eysler 3232: 3231:Edmund Eysler 3229: 3227: 3226: 3223: 3216: 3213: 3209: 3206: 3202: 3198: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3192: 3188: 3184: 3176: 3174: 3173: 3170: 3162: 3160: 3159: 3156: 3148:Vernon Sankey 3147: 3145: 3144: 3141: 3133: 3131: 3130: 3127: 3122: 3121: 3118: 3110: 3108: 3107: 3104: 3099: 3095: 3091: 3087: 3080: 3077: 3076: 3072: 3066: 3065: 3058: 3054: 3052: 3051: 3048: 3043: 3042: 3039: 3034: 3033: 3030: 3025: 3024: 3021: 3013: 3011: 3010: 3006: 3003: 2999: 2991: 2989: 2988: 2985: 2980: 2977: 2975: 2972: 2968: 2965: 2962: 2959: 2956: 2955: 2950: 2947: 2946: 2941: 2940: 2935: 2932: 2929: 2926: 2922: 2918: 2915: 2909: 2907: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2897: 2890: 2886: 2878: 2874: 2871: 2869: 2863: 2857: 2849: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2839: 2831:Junaid Sheikh 2830: 2828: 2827: 2824: 2822: 2817: 2815: 2805: 2799: 2796: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2784: 2780: 2779:Kurt Hellmer. 2771: 2767: 2763: 2762: 2756: 2754: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2737: 2734: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2724: 2720: 2716: 2711: 2710: 2707: 2703: 2695: 2688: 2684: 2680: 2676: 2672: 2667: 2664: 2662: 2659: 2656: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2643: 2641: 2640: 2637: 2629: 2627: 2626: 2623: 2617: 2614: 2610: 2606: 2602: 2595: 2588: 2584: 2581: 2578: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2568: 2565: 2561: 2557: 2549: 2547: 2546: 2543: 2539: 2531: 2529: 2527: 2520: 2512: 2510: 2508: 2498: 2488: 2485: 2484:Pascal.Tesson 2481: 2480: 2479: 2476: 2475:Pascal.Tesson 2471: 2470: 2469: 2466: 2465:Pascal.Tesson 2461: 2456: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2446: 2445:Pascal.Tesson 2441: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2435: 2432: 2424: 2420: 2417: 2413: 2409: 2406: 2401: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2390: 2382: 2378: 2375: 2370: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2360: 2355: 2348: 2345: 2341: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2319: 2317: 2309: 2307: 2306: 2303: 2295: 2293: 2292: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2276: 2274: 2266: 2264: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2249: 2238: 2234: 2231: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2210: 2203: 2202: 2199: 2191: 2188: 2186: 2185: 2182: 2178: 2170: 2164: 2161: 2159: 2154: 2152: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2136: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2127: 2125: 2120: 2118: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2106: 2104: 2099: 2097: 2090: 2089: 2086: 2084: 2079: 2077: 2067: 2065: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2036: 2034: 2033: 2030: 2026: 2021: 2020:William Poole 2014: 2011: 2009: 2008: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1992: 1988: 1983: 1977: 1970:. Cool, huh? 1969: 1966: 1964: 1959: 1957: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1945: 1940: 1938: 1934: 1928: 1927: 1924: 1920: 1919: 1914: 1906: 1904: 1903: 1900: 1895: 1892: 1889: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1859: 1855: 1848: 1846: 1845: 1842: 1836:Your welcome. 1835: 1833: 1832: 1829: 1823: 1822: 1819: 1814: 1813: 1810: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1793: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1778: 1777: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1754: 1751: 1733: 1730: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1695: 1692: 1690: 1684: 1678: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1644: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1606: 1603: 1601: 1595: 1589: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1562: 1559: 1555: 1553: 1548: 1544: 1539: 1536: 1533: 1532: 1529: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1511: 1508: 1506: 1500: 1494: 1486: 1482: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1467: 1464: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1454: 1451: 1449: 1443: 1437: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1422: 1415: 1412: 1410: 1407: 1405: 1402: 1400: 1397: 1395: 1392: 1390: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1379: 1375: 1372: 1369: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1356: 1354: 1352: 1350: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1341: 1330: 1329: 1326: 1317: 1312: 1311: 1308: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1280: 1276: 1274: 1273: 1270: 1261: 1259: 1258: 1255: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1217: 1208: 1203: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1184: 1177: 1175: 1174: 1171: 1169: 1168: 1161: 1160: 1157: 1155: 1154: 1146: 1140: 1139: 1136: 1134: 1133: 1126: 1121: 1120: 1117: 1115: 1114: 1106: 1105: 1102: 1100: 1099: 1092: 1087: 1086: 1083: 1081: 1080: 1068: 1064: 1061: 1059: 1053: 1047: 1039: 1038: 1034: 1032: 1031: 1028: 1018: 1013: 1009: 1004: 1000: 996: 991: 990: 989: 986: 981: 980: 979: 978: 973: 969: 964: 960: 956: 949: 945: 939: 935: 929: 928: 923: 919: 918: 917: 916: 913: 909: 903: 902: 896: 895: 894: 893: 889: 883: 882: 878:it's funny. 876: 872: 864: 862: 861: 858: 854: 851: 848: 844: 840: 832: 826: 821: 815: 814: 807: 806: 805: 804: 803: 802: 797: 791: 790: 782: 774: 770: 767: 765: 759: 753: 745: 744: 743: 736: 734: 733: 730: 723: 722: 710: 707: 705: 699: 693: 684: 683: 682: 681: 680: 679: 678: 677: 674: 667: 666: 653: 650: 648: 642: 636: 627: 623: 618: 617: 616: 615: 614: 613: 612: 611: 608: 601: 600: 592: 581: 578: 576: 570: 564: 556: 551: 547: 546: 545: 544: 543: 542: 539: 532: 531: 522: 519: 517: 511: 505: 497: 493: 490: 489:a single page 486: 479: 475: 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 465: 464: 463: 460: 453: 452: 441: 438: 436: 430: 424: 415: 414: 413: 412: 406: 401: 400: 399: 398: 397: 396: 393: 386: 385: 375: 371: 368: 366: 360: 354: 346: 345: 344: 337: 335: 334: 331: 323:G.W. Reynolds 322: 320: 319: 316: 312: 308: 300: 298: 297: 294: 286: 283: 279: 275: 274: 273: 272: 269: 264: 260: 256: 251: 250: 247: 243: 239: 234: 226: 224: 223: 220: 213: 210: 209: 204: 203: 198: 197: 193: 189: 184: 183: 179: 178: 173: 172: 167: 166: 161: 158: 154: 153: 152: 151: 148: 142: 140: 137: 134:. Currently, 133: 127: 121: 119: 118: 115: 111: 108: 105: 97: 91: 88: 85: 83: 80: 78: 75: 72: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4547:Adirondacker 4544: 4509: 4474: 4444: 4429: 4419: 4411:poorly. -- 4408: 4405: 4393: 4391: 4379: 4377: 4367: 4357: 4342: 4328: 4317:Adirondacker 4309: 4298:Jason McHuff 4295: 4281: 4249: 4240: 4212: 4182: 4151: 4143: 4126: 4124: 4110: 4095: 4084:Adirondacker 4077:Adirondacker 4069:Adirondacker 4065: 4047: 4036:Adirondacker 4032: 4011:Adirondacker 4001: 3974: 3950: 3928: 3908: 3905: 3865: 3863: 3841: 3804: 3778: 3770: 3761: 3752: 3748: 3723: 3714: 3711: 3665: 3619: 3603: 3599:User:SineBot 3587: 3573: 3559: 3545: 3541: 3537: 3529: 3524: 3522: 3518: 3510: 3507: 3440: 3437: 3434: 3427: 3406: 3378: 3359: 3344: 3316: 3303:64.60.124.51 3292: 3278: 3264: 3235: 3219: 3201:Slrubenstein 3187:Slrubenstein 3180: 3166: 3151: 3137: 3123: 3114: 3103:DavidPickett 3090:DavidPickett 3081: 3078: 3067: 3061: 3044: 3035: 3026: 3017: 3014:My talk page 2995: 2981: 2978: 2969: 2966: 2963: 2960: 2957: 2951: 2948: 2942: 2936: 2933: 2930: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2916: 2913: 2892: 2882: 2851: 2848:this article 2838:PrettyIndGal 2834: 2820: 2813: 2809: 2795:AtomikWeasel 2783:AtomikWeasel 2776: 2759: 2719:Kurt Hellmer 2712: 2706:AtomikWeasel 2699: 2647: 2633: 2618: 2596: 2592: 2553: 2535: 2516: 2502: 2459: 2428: 2405:Edison Medal 2386: 2383:Edison Medal 2368: 2351: 2313: 2299: 2277: 2270: 2242: 2204: 2194: 2174: 2157: 2150: 2123: 2116: 2102: 2095: 2091: 2082: 2075: 2071: 2040: 2017: 1984: 1981: 1962: 1955: 1941: 1936: 1932: 1929: 1917: 1916: 1912: 1910: 1852: 1839: 1824: 1815: 1806: 1788: 1772: 1757: 1672: 1583: 1551: 1550: 1488: 1431: 1419:Thank you. ← 1418: 1383: 1331: 1313: 1283: 1265: 1249: 1248: 1244: 1240:User:TheFox4 1212: 1181: 1166: 1165: 1162: 1152: 1151: 1145:Eddie Garcia 1141: 1131: 1130: 1122: 1112: 1111: 1107: 1097: 1096: 1088: 1078: 1077: 1072: 1041: 1023: 1003:Hong Qi Gong 998: 994: 963:Hong Qi Gong 954: 952: 925: 921: 899: 879: 874: 868: 849: 836: 812: 788: 781:Almaty Metro 778: 747: 740: 720: 717: 687: 664: 660: 630: 598: 590: 586: 558: 529: 525: 499: 450: 446: 418: 383: 379: 348: 341: 326: 304: 289: 252: 230: 217: 157:my talk page 143: 128: 125: 112: 109: 101: 70: 43: 37: 4482:—Preceding 4477:Phoo Action 4471:Phoo Action 4449:—Preceding 4185:—Preceding 4155:—Preceding 4005:—Preceding 3782:—Preceding 3726:—Preceding 3576:WhisperToMe 3458:left a note 3321:—Preceding 3252:Cricketgirl 3242:Cricketgirl 3084:—Preceding 2982:Thank you, 2669:—Preceding 2661:Mario Party 2644:Guess what? 2622:Kathryns614 2605:Kathryns614 2599:—Preceding 2400:Nobel Prize 2296:please stop 2246:—Preceding 2207:—Preceding 2044:—Preceding 1881:User:Rabota 1368:Will Beback 1316:Will Beback 1298:Will Beback 1209:~*Chuckle*~ 293:Tim Vickers 282:Tim Vickers 268:JonSDSUGrad 36:This is an 4488:Scott.lyon 4455:Arsenal666 4346:hbdragon88 4136:(contribs) 3868:Gajraj Rao 3750:articles. 3622:talk pages 2542:Iamunknown 2181:Iamunknown 2171:Hey there! 2004:Nodekeeper 1899:Blueshirts 985:Hare-Yukai 843:Fildelfair 721:Poeticbent 665:Poeticbent 599:Poeticbent 530:Poeticbent 451:Poeticbent 384:Poeticbent 136:Powershell 90:Archive 10 4380:hunt down 4331:Alien joe 4113:Alien joe 4054:muriel@pt 3989:muriel@pt 3978:muriel@pt 3888:Hee hee, 3675:seriously 3634:Shift key 3584:Thanks!!! 3525:"obvious" 3441:Cheers! 3327:Alien joe 3319:Alien joe 3281:Alien joe 3140:Alien joe 3134:Thank you 3126:Alien joe 3117:Alien joe 3047:Alien joe 3038:Alien joe 3029:Alien joe 3020:Alien joe 2861:seriously 2636:Alien joe 2455:WP:CSD#A7 1918:seriously 1913:seriously 1877:suspended 1841:Backtable 1682:seriously 1593:seriously 1498:seriously 1479:them per 1441:seriously 1051:seriously 757:seriously 697:seriously 640:seriously 568:seriously 509:seriously 428:seriously 358:seriously 315:SqueakBox 246:AndrewGNF 219:Thoward37 206:progress. 147:Thoward37 82:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 71:Archive 3 65:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 4529:Garion96 4516:Garion96 4496:contribs 4484:unsigned 4463:contribs 4451:unsigned 4433:AvatarMN 4423:AvatarMN 4413:AvatarMN 4399:AvatarMN 4385:AvatarMN 4371:AvatarMN 4361:AvatarMN 4216:Lectonar 4199:contribs 4187:unsigned 4169:contribs 4157:unsigned 4019:contribs 4007:unsigned 3971:Question 3796:contribs 3784:unsigned 3740:contribs 3728:unsigned 3590:Victor12 3548:Geo Swan 3504:Your POV 3495:Geo Swan 3443:Geo Swan 3419:Sada Jan 3394:contribs 3382:unsigned 3335:contribs 3323:unsigned 3299:unsigned 3169:CApitol3 3098:contribs 3086:unsigned 2984:Swc info 2971:Swc info 2895:Melsaran 2806:Response 2750:Dsmdgold 2733:Dsmdgold 2723:Dsmdgold 2683:contribs 2675:AR Argon 2671:unsigned 2613:contribs 2601:unsigned 2431:Masamage 2425:Re: Glad 2260:contribs 2252:Jlfutari 2248:unsigned 2230:Roxithro 2221:contribs 2209:unsigned 2198:Roxithro 2058:contribs 2046:unsigned 1944:AR Argon 1923:AR Argon 1873:youtube 1791:Jreferee 1775:Jreferee 1552:normally 1318:. Hmmm. 1199:Treekids 1191:Treekids 1012:Contribs 972:Contribs 927:Ksy92003 901:Ksy92003 881:Ksy92003 857:Wikidemo 853:contribs 591:Warning: 114:Leitmanp 4339:Jaranda 4191:Edbyrne 4161:Edbyrne 4107:My page 3949:GROAN. 3842:Arcayne 3645:SineBot 3533:WP:NPOV 3514:WP:NPOV 3468:of the 3423:replied 3417:tag on 2836:Regards 2577:Nv8200p 2564:Nv8200p 2523:Thanks, 2374:llywrch 2359:llywrch 1996:WP:NFCC 1991:WP:NFCC 1982:Hello; 330:Raasgat 231:Hello, 211:Thanks, 39:archive 4532:(talk) 4519:(talk) 4512:WP:PUI 4133:(talk) 3814:ggKfc 3764:JoBrLa 3755:JoBrLa 3732:JoBrLa 3717:JoBrLa 3630:tildes 3313:Trivia 3111:Banner 2889:WP:BLP 2460:should 2416:Edison 2340:ComSoc 2322:ComSoc 2135:WP:NOT 1937:Cheezy 1897:year. 1636:WP:DRV 1485:WP:NFC 1481:WP:NFC 1339:facets 1324:facets 1306:facets 1027:rabota 946:About 933:(talk) 907:(talk) 887:(talk) 555:WP:SCV 550:WP:AGF 478:WP:SCV 4284:Mswer 3879:WP:RS 3809:GgKfc 3788:GgKfc 3681:folks 3421:. I 3155:Paste 2867:folks 2821:Argon 2302:Míkka 2158:Argon 2124:Argon 2103:Argon 2083:Argon 1963:Argon 1770:. -- 1688:folks 1599:folks 1504:folks 1447:folks 1057:folks 922:after 839:WP:AN 819:Chat 813:Pedro 795:Chat 789:Pedro 763:folks 703:folks 646:folks 574:folks 515:folks 434:folks 364:folks 255:PPARG 233:PPARG 16:< 4492:talk 4459:talk 4392:You 4195:talk 4165:talk 4050:here 4015:talk 3958:idea 3936:idea 3916:idea 3890:salt 3792:talk 3736:talk 3478:tag. 3473:npov 3403:POV? 3390:talk 3331:talk 3307:talk 3205:Talk 3191:Talk 3094:talk 3062:RE: 2901:talk 2885:this 2850:! -- 2766:talk 2679:talk 2609:talk 2580:talk 2567:talk 2558:and 2354:bold 2320:and 2256:talk 2217:talk 2054:talk 1911:But 1858:blog 1638:. ← 1487:. -- 1365:·:· 1277:COI 1238:RE: 1008:Talk 968:Talk 847:talk 727:talk 671:talk 626:WP:C 622:WP:C 605:talk 536:talk 498:. -- 496:WP:C 457:talk 405:WP:C 390:talk 328:why? 278:here 214:Troy 4325:Bye 4254:Hús 4128:TCC 3953:Wik 3931:Wik 3911:Wik 3881:. 3669:But 3460:on 3412:pov 3203:| 3189:| 2998:edg 2855:But 2761:DGG 2746:RfA 2717:of 2369:are 2029:JHP 2002:. - 1907:No. 1871:'s 1828:Ben 1818:Ben 1809:Ben 1762:of 1729:Ben 1676:But 1640:Ben 1587:But 1558:Ben 1492:But 1463:Ben 1435:But 1421:Ben 1371:·:· 1045:But 1001:. 871:3RR 751:But 691:But 634:But 562:But 503:But 422:But 352:But 311:ifd 4498:) 4494:• 4465:) 4461:• 4409:so 4264:nd 4201:) 4197:• 4171:) 4167:• 4021:) 4017:• 3849:() 3798:) 3794:• 3753:-- 3742:) 3738:• 3715:-- 3643:-- 3476:}} 3470:{{ 3456:I 3415:}} 3409:{{ 3396:) 3392:• 3333:• 3275:Ok 3096:• 2903:) 2814:AR 2768:) 2685:) 2681:• 2630:Ty 2611:• 2258:• 2219:• 2151:AR 2117:AR 2096:AR 2076:AR 2060:) 2056:• 1956:AR 1939:. 1933:do 1893:, 1890:, 1879:. 1430:-- 1197:-- 1010:- 970:- 875:un 816:| 792:| 686:-- 629:-- 159:): 86:→ 4490:( 4457:( 4259:ö 4193:( 4163:( 4013:( 3874:) 3790:( 3734:( 3678:| 3672:| 3388:( 3361:( 3329:( 3305:( 3092:( 3005:★ 3002:☺ 2899:( 2864:| 2858:| 2764:( 2677:( 2607:( 2434:♫ 2254:( 2215:( 2052:( 1826:← 1727:← 1685:| 1679:| 1596:| 1590:| 1501:| 1495:| 1444:| 1438:| 1337:S 1322:S 1304:S 1204:) 1054:| 1048:| 1014:) 1006:( 974:) 966:( 850:· 845:( 760:| 754:| 700:| 694:| 643:| 637:| 589:" 571:| 565:| 512:| 506:| 431:| 425:| 407:. 361:| 355:| 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index