861:{{unblock|reason=Hello, I just like to say that I'm sorry for what I said to that user in the edit summary on Jesse Helms. I should not have said it, and it was in a moment of frustration. However, I'm here to note that I did not edit war on Soon and Baliunas or Helms. In fact, in both cases, after I added my text in and it was reverted, I tried to reach a consensus on the talk page. Once it was clear that the consensus was against me I stopped editing the page and accepted the editors' preferred version of the second sentence of that page which I disputed. In the Helms case, I added info about how Thomas voted for Clarence Thomas – a black american – to rebut the charge that he was racist. After a user reverted my changes out of a complaint that it was unsourced, I reinserted the info about the Thomas vote, along with a source, per his request. Subsequently, he reverted it again, this time saying I violated both of Knowledge's rules on original research and synthesis. After that, I went to the talk page and created a new section to make my case. Again, the editors were against me, so I asked a compromise: I would add helms's voting record on Supreme Court nominees, but not include it as a rebuttal. Another editor said I was on solid ground if the votes had significance. Then I added them in. However, another user has reverted my changes, noting that the sources I provided didn't have any significance to helms's votes. Because of this, I am not going to try to add my contribs into Helms anymore, since the consensus is again against me – which is what I did in the other case. And yes, I will not curse at other editors anymore, and I'll always assume good faith. It is for this reason, I believe I should be unblocked. ] (]) 15:47, 5 April 2015 (UTC)}}
1338:, let me give it you straight. You and I are not so different. There are 24,000,000 Wikipedians on this site. And those teeming masses exist for the sole purpose of lifing the few exceptional people onto their shoulders. You and me, we're exceptional. However, these Wikipedians, the majority of them, are liberal. And they love to advance liberal/progressive causes, but also find some Republicans/conservatives amusing. But the one thing they love more than a conservative politican, is to see that conservative fail, fall, die trying. In spite of everything this conservative has done for them (such as Jesse Helms), eventually they will hate you. That is why I came to Knowledge. I came not only to fix some factual errors prevalent in some Knowledge articles; I also came to give a much more NPOV to articles involving conservatives, where oftentimes bias, and even some out-and-out factual distortions, are prevalent. Knowledge's time has come for fixing. Like Constantinople or Rome before it, this place has become a breeding ground for suffering, bias, and injustice. It is for this reason, Bbb23, I'm asking you to unblock me. Yes, I will follow Knowledge's rules to the letter if you do. As far as I'm aware, there's nothing in Knowledge's rules against removing bias from articles. In fact, WP:NPOV encourages it. Think about it, Bbb23. I could accomplish a lot of good. Adios,
1451:, no replies? Nada? Guys, I sincerely think you've been drinking way too much Kool-Aid. I trusted you guys – I trusted that you would give me due process, which is what administrators are supposed to do when reviewing requests. Instead, you obviously haven't – which leads me to believe you haven't given it to the thousands of other users you've blocked over the years. Do you guys have any conscience? Or are you instead vultures, who take pride in preying on the little guy, the weak and downtrodden who are supposed to trust you? Now, I want you both to consider this seriously, if you've ever seeking redemption: What can you offer to make up for the misery you have wreaked, and are still wreaking, on thousands of people who trusted you? What fanatics do to us with guns and bombs you've consistently done to other editors by unjustly blocking and not unblocking them. Don't you think for a minute that you deserve anything better than they do (the fanatics). Shame on the both of you.
1381:. I might be a bit dramatic, but there are some things that just need to be said about Knowledge. You see, I consider myself a public servant, a knight in shining armor, if you will. Some people might call me greedy for doing these edits, and at times thumbing my nose at other editors (most of the time I don't do that). But guess what? Greed, for lack of a better word, is good. Greed is right. Greed works. Greed clarifies, cuts through, and captures, the essence of the evolutionary spirit. Greed, in all of its forms; greed for life, for money, for love, knowledge, has marked the upward surge of mankind and greed. And you know what I'm greedy for, Floquenbeam. I'm greedy for unbiased, neutral Knowledge articles. I'm the hero Knowledge deserves, its knight in shining armor. However, don't consider me your hero. I'm a silent guardian. A watchful protector. A Dark Knight. Adios, and best, wishes,
1302:, I'm not trying to get into conflict, I'm just trying to yes, set the record straight – while following Knowledge guidelines to cleanse articles of bias and at times inaccurate information. Listen, There's a point, far out there when the structures fail you, and the rules aren't weapons anymore, they're shackles, letting the bias prevalent in some Knowledge articles get ahead. One day, Liz, you may face such a moment of crisis, and in that moment I hope you have the courage to do what's right, to plunge your hands into the filth, so that others can keep theirs clean. And if you do that and get blocked, I hope that you appeal that block request with all your might. Thanks, and see you later,
614:
you must achieve consensus first. I'd like to note that I did try to achiveve consensus on the talk page and at least one user agreed with me, I didn't just revert other editors with no explanation. Nevertheless, it is wrong, and I won't do it again. Whenever I get into an edit dispute with someone, I'll make my case on that article's talk page, and not try to re-edit something in. I'm more educated about
Knowledge's policies, and am aware I exercised poor judgement. However, I will not behave like this again. For this reason, I'm asking to be unblocked.
979:, you've completely missed the forest for the trees. When you declined my unblock, you never mentioned the fact that I've been blocked for doing something I didn't do – edit warring. Nor did you explain why I'm guilty of supposed edit warring. If my block shouldn't be dropped entirely, it should at least be shortened. *sigh*. Listen. There's a point, far out there when the structures fail you, and the rules aren't weapons anymore, they're shackles, letting the bias prevalent in some Knowledge articles get ahead. One day,
1144:
talk page. I did not do that. I clearly discussed the matters on the talk pages of both articles, and when the consensus was against me, Guess what? I accepted defeat. I didn't revert anymore. I let the other editors who had the consensus have the last word. The world is cruel, and the only morality in a cruel world is chance. Unbiased. Unprejudiced. Fair. That's why I'm asking to be unblocked, I'm not blaming everyone else, I'm just saying that I did not edit war, I chatted significantly on the talk pages.
1492:
788:
448:
414:
533:
1058:
891:
702:
225:
1599:
312:
1216:. Even though I think if VQuakr had approached you more diplomatically you may have responded better, you are nonetheless responsible for your own behavior. You need some time off to cool your jets--as I mentioned to you twice before--and read all the pillars and major policies. I hope you assimilate them and become a productive editor.
1420:
on
Knowledge. Click older 100, and If you look at it, you'll see I've devoted my energy to useful things, such as updating outdated articles, adding info about a senator's indictment, and fixing punctual or grammatical errors, removing dead links and replacing them with live ones – things that a good
656:
new here. There's a lot to learn. Please read all that stuff they posted above in your welcome packet. I hope you learn the local culture quickly and as painlessly as possible. You've already gotten a block, so you might want to slow down and observe awhile before jumping into the fray. Some editors
613:
Hello, I'd just like to say that I'm sorry for edit warring. Make no mistake - this was my bad, I'm not blaming anyone else, and I shouldn't have done it. It did what I did because I felt my edits were right; however, I now know that you can't edit war even if you feel your changes are correct, that
276:
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit
1623:
been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to
Knowledge policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Knowledge
1395:
Well, now, you're just trolling. I guess you were before but you were given the benefit of a doubt that you were actually sincere. You've ignored all of the advice that has been given to you and while you may think "there are some things that just need to be said", you have to face the consequences
1359:
I suppose you might try a less dramatic, more practical unblock request for your last chance before removal of talk page privileges (repeated unsuccessful unblock requests are a timesink). I very much doubt it will succeed - "fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me" - but it is more
1143:
I'm perfectly familiar with WP:NOT THEM, and in my unblock request, I never blamed anyone else for what's happened, in fact, I didn't mention any other editors on the Helms and
Baliunas articles by name. I merely mentioned the fact that edit warring is when you keep reverting without discussing on
867:
As nicely as your unblock request reads, given that it comes a day after you were unblocked because you made similar statements of contrition, I cannot accept your request. For a relatively new editor, you've gotten yourself into a heap of trouble very quickly. You're going to have to learn how to
983:, you may face such a moment of crisis, and in that moment I hope you have the courage to do what's right, to plunge your hands into the filth, so that others can keep theirs clean. And if you do that and get blocked, I hope that you appeal that block request with all your might. Regards,reply
1243:, and you had said you wouldn't do it again. Yet here you are again, less than three days later, saving an edit summary so nasty that an admin had to revision delete it. Also, you've been edit warring again, another thing you said even more recently you wouldn't repeat, in the unblock request
1421:
Wikipedian, not a troll, does. I'm not a lost cause, which is what some are implying here. Man looks in the abyss, there's nothing staring back at him. At that moment, man finds his character. And that is what keeps him out of the abyss. I'm not in the abyss right now.
768:
Cali, I'm coming back to add that you can't expect a kind, helping hand when you lash out like that. You've said several times you're "a reasonable guy," and that's been my experience with you so far. But I don't think swearing at people is very reasonable.
1320:, you and I are going to face the same crisis (see further above). Maybe we can form a support group. Really, @Cali11298, don't you think you're being a mite overdramatic? BTW, that's more a rhetorical question; it doesn't require a response.--
1247:
praised. Please don't make the mistake of thinking your first unblock (which was proper IMO, considering your good unblock request) means you can continue to violate our policies as long as you express contrition in nice unblock requests.
1270:
for guidance. Coming to
Knowledge to right great wrongs or set the record straight will lead to future blocks of longer durations. It would help if you edited on articles that you didn't have any attachment to, where a
366:, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Knowledge is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block,
1166:
It is, indeed, a cruel world, filled with despair and gnashing of teeth, hurt and pain and sadness and loss. I weep, knowing what I must do, but it would not be moral to do otherwise.
1619:, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Knowledge administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you
120:. Don't attack living people anywhere on Knowledge, most especially not in edit summaries, which remain in page histories unless they're deleted using admin tools. Thank you.
426:
418:
1616:
1612:
1508:
1200:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
1049:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
235:. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's
658:
1611:
by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one
Knowledge account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at
1515:. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the
1235:
I will leave the unblock review to a completely uninvolved admin. But I want to note here that I don't think a week is too long, and I agree with
1098:
931:
568:
244:
62:
1516:
1185:
1034:
832:
476:
38:
69:
1615:, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with
1093:
926:
563:
298:
206:
22:
494:
374:
236:
661:, which hurts. Knowledge is different from a discussion forum or an academic conference. Best wishes as you learn your way!
816:
710:
323:
52:
502:
386:
331:
252:
57:
1360:
likely to succeed that melodramatic complaints about the cruelness of the world and how much good you could do in it.--
1213:
828:
472:
390:
302:
256:
210:
730:
if you want to edit here. Incidentally, you are expected to provide the support for material you add or restore per
1267:
1209:
1070:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
903:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
1499:
1071:
904:
795:
719:
506:
455:
369:
264:
134:
Fine, I won't do it again. Still, that doesn't change the fact
Menendez is exactly what I said he was. Regards,
1554:
1065:
898:
540:
1637:
1608:
1266:, you talk about editing almost as a moral activity. This approach will lead you into conflict. Please read
1112:
945:
582:
1512:
1021:
824:
468:
464:
460:
422:
382:
363:
343:
319:
269:
248:
247:
for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant
232:
43:
29:
1365:
1171:
398:
80:
417:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
25:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
76:
33:
427:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Cali11298 reported by User:VQuakr (Result: )
1567:
1550:
498:
378:
335:
327:
294:
240:
202:
159:
88:
1009:. Secondly, edit-warring is not limited to breaking 3RR. During your break, please carefully read
1632:
1253:
1221:
774:
759:
751:
666:
125:
1013:; your attempts to add a bit about Clarence Thomas to the Helms article clearly violates that.
338:
rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
87:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
1579:
1015:
1006:
1533:
1448:
1378:
1361:
1194:
1167:
1043:
838:
740:
731:
482:
434:
394:
97:
to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!
1491:
1475:
1325:
1010:
877:
852:
787:
447:
1546:
1521:
1467:
1452:
1422:
1382:
1339:
1303:
1272:
1263:
1145:
1076:
984:
909:
679:
615:
546:
518:
286:
273:
194:
174:
154:
153:
a soapbox for you to advocate your political views. Abandon that behavior now, please.
135:
1413:
1249:
1244:
1217:
820:
770:
755:
662:
637:
121:
102:
1575:
1239:'s comment above. I had warned you explicitly and specifically against lashing out
808:
804:
117:
48:
1466:
I've revoked your Talk page access because of these posts. You may appeal through
1527:
812:
736:
714:
430:
281:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
243:
among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See
72:, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Knowledge.
701:
224:
1471:
1444:
1335:
1321:
1236:
980:
976:
873:
848:
513:
827:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may
471:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may
1570:, regarding the indefinite block, why did you indefinitely block without
1397:
1317:
1294:
1276:
377:
to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents
98:
231:
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an
1646:
1583:
1558:
1539:
1479:
1460:
1430:
1407:
1390:
1369:
1347:
1329:
1311:
1286:
1256:
1225:
1175:
1153:
1024:
992:
881:
856:
778:
763:
744:
687:
670:
640:
623:
525:
438:
402:
351:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made
306:
214:
182:
166:
143:
128:
106:
84:
373:. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
116:
Hi, Caili. I've deleted the edit summary of your recent edit to
272:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
1519:, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the
754:. Please try reasoning with Cali before threatening. Thanks.
1597:
1490:
1056:
889:
786:
531:
446:
310:
223:
724:. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
389:. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
368:
breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a
501:. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
21:
Hello, Cali11298, and welcome to
Knowledge! Thank you for
1182:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
1031:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
1202:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
1051:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
421:
regarding a possible violation of
Knowledge's policy on
1571:
1417:
1233:
1126:
1122:
1116:
1107:
1103:
1089:
1085:
1081:
959:
955:
949:
940:
936:
922:
918:
914:
727:
596:
592:
586:
577:
573:
559:
555:
551:
263:
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being
93:
505:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
381:
among editors. You can post a request for help at an
1064:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
897:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
835:, then adding the following text below this notice:
539:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
479:, then adding the following text below this notice:
255:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
1511:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
823:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
636:About as perfect an unblock request as I've seen.
467:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
419:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
357:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
726:You are going to need to refrain from stuff like
239:to work toward making a version that represents
1607:Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into
279:even if you don't violate the three-revert rule
362:In particular, editors should be aware of the
1613:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Cali11298
408:Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
8:
1396:of your words, attitude and conduct. Sigh.
493:During a dispute, you should first try to
322:according to the reverts you have made on
284:So there is no surprises if you continue.
1617:the guide to responding to investigations
318:You currently appear to be engaged in an
193:Would recommend you get consensus first.
1572:the current WP:Sockpuppet investigation
173:I already said I wouldn't do it again.
1232:Caili11298, since I warned you above,
713:on other people again, as you did at
7:
1275:is easier to maintain. Good luck!
344:Knowledge's policy on edit warring
342:Please be particularly aware that
14:
1574:closing as a sock of Cali11298?
1545:Upped to indefinite for another
700:
412:
58:How to create your first article
1334:Eh, I'll respond anyway. Look,
268:—especially if you violate the
330:with others, to avoid editing
68:You may also want to take the
1:
1522:Unblock Ticket Request System
1503:from editing for a period of
817:Soon and Baliunas controversy
799:from editing for a period of
495:discuss controversial changes
459:temporarily from editing for
324:Abstinence-only sex education
91:, ask me on my talk page, or
44:The five pillars of Knowledge
1068:, who declined the request.
901:, who declined the request.
543:, who accepted the request.
528:
1662:
1584:00:04, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
1559:23:50, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
107:21:56, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
63:Simplified Manual of Style
1540:02:26, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
1517:guide to appealing blocks
1513:make useful contributions
1480:00:00, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
1461:23:53, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
1431:17:40, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
1408:16:48, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
1391:16:28, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
1370:11:33, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
1348:01:59, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
1330:01:13, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
1312:00:59, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
1287:00:18, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
1257:16:54, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
1226:16:17, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
1186:guide to appealing blocks
1176:11:26, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
1154:18:28, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
1035:guide to appealing blocks
1025:18:14, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
993:18:03, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
882:16:25, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
857:15:25, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
833:guide to appealing blocks
825:make useful contributions
779:05:45, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
764:05:40, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
745:03:29, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
688:22:54, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
671:22:52, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
641:03:53, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
624:03:06, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
526:02:31, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
477:guide to appealing blocks
469:make useful contributions
439:02:19, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
403:01:17, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
307:13:15, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
215:13:14, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
183:12:32, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
167:06:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
144:19:54, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
129:19:42, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
39:Contributing to Knowledge
1647:01:57, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
1592:Sockpuppet investigation
1456:
1426:
1386:
1343:
1307:
1214:assumption of good faith
1149:
988:
683:
619:
336:try to reach a consensus
326:. Users are expected to
178:
139:
383:appropriate noticeboard
53:How to develop articles
1602:
1495:
1061:
894:
791:
722:without further notice
536:
451:
315:
228:
1601:
1494:
1208:Cali, I think you've
1113:change block settings
1060:
946:change block settings
893:
872:violating policies.--
843:Your reason here ~~~~
831:by first reading the
790:
583:change block settings
535:
487:Your reason here ~~~~
475:by first reading the
450:
314:
227:
1418:contribution history
720:blocked from editing
265:blocked from editing
1268:WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS
89:Knowledge:Questions
75:Please remember to
70:Knowledge Adventure
1603:
1496:
1416:. Just look at my
1412:I am NOT a troll,
1062:
1005:First of all, see
895:
805:disruptive editing
792:
537:
503:dispute resolution
463:and violating the
452:
387:dispute resolution
316:
253:dispute resolution
229:
49:How to edit a page
23:your contributions
1241:in edit summaries
868:control yourself
829:appeal this block
473:appeal this block
465:three-revert rule
364:three-revert rule
270:three-revert rule
79:your messages on
1653:
1644:
1635:
1631:
1600:
1538:
1405:
1284:
1199:
1193:
1132:
1130:
1119:
1101:
1099:deleted contribs
1059:
1048:
1042:
1019:
965:
963:
952:
934:
932:deleted contribs
892:
846:
821:personal attacks
815:and mini war at
711:personal attacks
704:
602:
600:
589:
571:
569:deleted contribs
534:
523:
516:
490:
425:. The thread is
416:
415:
313:
291:
199:
164:
162:Let's discuss it
96:
1661:
1660:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1642:
1638:
1633:
1629:
1627:
1626:
1604:
1598:
1594:
1542:
1526:
1488:
1398:
1277:
1205:
1197:
1191:
1190:, then use the
1179:
1157:
1120:
1110:
1096:
1079:
1072:blocking policy
1057:
1054:
1046:
1040:
1039:, then use the
1028:
1017:
996:
953:
943:
929:
912:
905:blocking policy
890:
859:
836:
698:
650:
645:
644:
627:
590:
580:
566:
549:
532:
519:
514:
511:
507:page protection
480:
429:. Thank you.
413:
410:
391:page protection
311:
287:
257:page protection
222:
195:
191:
160:
114:
92:
83:by typing four
34:Getting started
19:
12:
11:
5:
1659:
1657:
1640:
1605:
1596:
1595:
1593:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1586:
1568:Reaper Eternal
1562:
1561:
1551:Reaper Eternal
1497:You have been
1489:
1487:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1442:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1261:
1260:
1229:
1228:
1180:
1164:
1160:Decline reason
1141:
1137:Request reason
1134:
1055:
1029:
1003:
999:Decline reason
974:
970:Request reason
967:
888:
887:
886:
885:
884:
793:You have been
785:
784:
783:
782:
781:
709:; if you make
697:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
652:Hi, I see you
649:
646:
634:
611:
607:Request reason
604:
530:
453:You have been
445:
443:
409:
406:
360:
359:
354:
339:
282:
221:
218:
190:
187:
186:
185:
170:
169:
113:
110:
66:
65:
60:
55:
46:
41:
36:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1658:
1649:
1648:
1645:
1643:
1636:
1634:Non-Dropframe
1625:
1622:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1591:
1585:
1581:
1577:
1573:
1569:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1548:
1544:
1543:
1541:
1537:
1536:
1531:
1530:
1524:
1523:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1501:
1493:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1458:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1419:
1415:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1406:
1403:
1402:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1367:
1363:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1299:
1298:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1285:
1282:
1281:
1274:
1269:
1265:
1258:
1255:
1251:
1246:
1245:User:Jpgordon
1242:
1238:
1234:
1231:
1230:
1227:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1207:
1206:
1204:
1203:
1196:
1189:
1187:
1178:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1163:
1161:
1156:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1140:
1138:
1133:
1128:
1124:
1118:
1114:
1109:
1105:
1100:
1095:
1091:
1090:global blocks
1087:
1086:active blocks
1083:
1078:
1073:
1069:
1067:
1066:administrator
1053:
1052:
1045:
1038:
1036:
1027:
1026:
1023:
1022:
1020:
1012:
1008:
1002:
1000:
995:
994:
990:
986:
982:
978:
973:
971:
966:
961:
957:
951:
947:
942:
938:
933:
928:
924:
923:global blocks
920:
919:active blocks
916:
911:
906:
902:
900:
899:administrator
883:
879:
875:
871:
866:
865:
864:
863:
862:
858:
854:
850:
844:
840:
834:
830:
826:
822:
818:
814:
810:
806:
802:
798:
797:
789:
780:
776:
772:
767:
766:
765:
761:
757:
753:
749:
748:
747:
746:
742:
738:
735:
733:
729:
723:
721:
717:, you may be
716:
712:
708:
705:This is your
703:
695:
689:
685:
681:
677:
676:
675:
674:
673:
672:
668:
664:
660:
655:
647:
643:
642:
639:
633:
631:
630:Accept reason
626:
625:
621:
617:
610:
608:
603:
598:
594:
588:
584:
579:
575:
570:
565:
561:
560:global blocks
557:
556:active blocks
553:
548:
544:
542:
541:administrator
529:
527:
524:
522:
517:
510:
508:
504:
500:
496:
488:
484:
478:
474:
470:
466:
462:
458:
457:
449:
444:
441:
440:
436:
432:
428:
424:
420:
407:
405:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
371:
365:
358:
355:
352:
349:
348:
347:
345:
340:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
309:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
290:
285:
280:
275:
271:
267:
266:
260:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
226:
219:
217:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
198:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
171:
168:
165:
163:
158:
157:
152:
149:Knowledge is
148:
147:
146:
145:
141:
137:
132:
130:
127:
123:
119:
111:
109:
108:
104:
100:
95:
90:
86:
82:
78:
73:
71:
64:
61:
59:
56:
54:
50:
47:
45:
42:
40:
37:
35:
31:
28:
27:
26:
24:
16:
1639:
1628:
1620:
1609:sockpuppetry
1606:
1534:
1528:
1520:
1509:sockpuppetry
1504:
1498:
1486:Block notice
1441:
1400:
1399:
1358:
1316:Apparently,
1296:
1295:
1279:
1278:
1262:
1240:
1201:
1183:
1181:
1165:
1159:
1158:
1142:
1136:
1135:
1108:creation log
1075:
1063:
1050:
1032:
1030:
1014:
1004:
998:
997:
975:
969:
968:
941:creation log
908:
896:
869:
860:
842:
809:edit warring
807:, including
800:
794:
725:
718:
707:only warning
706:
699:
659:bite newbies
653:
651:
635:
629:
628:
612:
606:
605:
578:creation log
545:
538:
520:
512:
492:
486:
461:edit warring
454:
442:
423:edit warring
411:
367:
361:
356:
350:
341:
332:disruptively
317:
288:
283:
278:
262:
261:
230:
196:
192:
161:
155:
150:
133:
118:Bob Menendez
115:
74:
67:
30:Introduction
20:
1624:community.
1449:Floquenbeam
1379:Floquenbeam
1362:Floquenbeam
1168:Floquenbeam
813:Jesse Helms
752:WP:DONTBITE
715:Jesse Helms
678:Thank you,
395:Binksternet
328:collaborate
249:noticeboard
1547:sockpuppet
1445:User:Bbb23
1377:Good day,
1104:filter log
1007:WP:NOTTHEM
937:filter log
696:April 2015
638:--jpgordon
574:filter log
220:April 2015
112:April 2015
94:click here
81:talk pages
1453:Cali11298
1423:Cali11298
1383:Cali11298
1340:Cali11298
1304:Cali11298
1264:Cali11298
1210:exhausted
1184:read the
1146:Cali11298
1123:checkuser
1082:block log
1077:Cali11298
1033:read the
985:Cali11298
956:checkuser
915:block log
910:Cali11298
732:WP:BURDEN
680:Cali11298
616:Cali11298
593:checkuser
552:block log
547:Cali11298
499:consensus
497:and seek
379:consensus
375:talk page
334:, and to
289:Doc James
241:consensus
237:talk page
197:Doc James
189:Consensus
175:Cali11298
136:Cali11298
1250:Bishonen
1218:YoPienso
1094:contribs
1018:itsJamie
1011:WP:SYNTH
927:contribs
841:|reason=
801:one week
771:YoPienso
756:YoPienso
750:VQuakr,
663:YoPienso
648:Welcome!
564:contribs
485:|reason=
385:or seek
346:states:
320:edit war
299:contribs
277:warring—
251:or seek
233:edit war
207:contribs
122:Bishonen
17:Welcome!
1576:Flyer22
1505:1 month
1500:blocked
1468:WP:UTRS
1273:WP:NPOV
1195:unblock
1117:unblock
1044:unblock
950:unblock
839:unblock
796:blocked
587:unblock
483:unblock
456:blocked
274:reverts
1529:Mike V
1447:, and
1443:Damn,
870:before
819:; and
737:VQuakr
521:(talk)
431:VQuakr
156:Cullen
85:tildes
1472:Bbb23
1336:Bbb23
1322:Bbb23
1237:Bbb23
1188:first
1037:first
981:Bbb23
977:Bbb23
874:Bbb23
849:Bbb23
370:block
303:email
211:email
1641:talk
1621:have
1580:talk
1555:talk
1535:Talk
1507:for
1476:talk
1457:talk
1427:talk
1387:talk
1366:talk
1344:talk
1326:talk
1308:talk
1254:talk
1222:talk
1212:our
1172:talk
1150:talk
1016:OhNo
989:talk
878:talk
853:talk
803:for
775:talk
760:talk
741:talk
728:this
684:talk
667:talk
620:talk
515:Kuru
435:talk
399:talk
295:talk
203:talk
179:talk
140:talk
126:talk
103:talk
77:sign
51:and
32:and
1525:.
1470:.--
1414:Liz
1318:Liz
1127:log
1074:).
960:log
907:).
847:.
811:at
654:are
597:log
393:.
259:.
245:BRD
151:not
99:RFD
1630:--
1582:)
1557:)
1549:.
1532:•
1478:)
1459:)
1429:)
1404:iz
1389:)
1368:)
1346:)
1328:)
1310:)
1300:iz
1283:iz
1252:|
1224:)
1198:}}
1192:{{
1174:)
1162::
1152:)
1139::
1121:•
1115:•
1111:•
1106:•
1102:•
1097:•
1092:•
1088:•
1084:•
1047:}}
1041:{{
1001::
991:)
972::
954:•
948:•
944:•
939:•
935:•
930:•
925:•
921:•
917:•
880:)
855:)
845:}}
837:{{
777:)
762:)
743:)
686:)
669:)
632::
622:)
609::
591:•
585:•
581:•
576:•
572:•
567:•
562:•
558:•
554:•
509:.
489:}}
481:{{
437:)
401:)
305:)
301:·
297:·
213:)
209:·
205:·
181:)
142:)
131:.
124:|
105:)
1578:(
1553:(
1474:(
1455:(
1425:(
1401:L
1385:(
1364:(
1342:(
1324:(
1306:(
1297:L
1280:L
1259:.
1220:(
1170:(
1148:(
1131:)
1129:)
1125:(
1080:(
987:(
964:)
962:)
958:(
913:(
876:(
851:(
773:(
758:(
739:(
734:.
682:(
665:(
618:(
601:)
599:)
595:(
550:(
491:.
433:(
397:(
353:.
293:(
201:(
177:(
138:(
101:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.